In democrat areas, HUD is "out of housing", and they are running "housing lotteries" instead of helping the needy. They are getting paid tons of money but there is no housing: the local "PHA's" run RAD HCV which are both closed - only a "lottery" is open a few days (see link below for images and about who is running this "lottery"!)
The lotteries are illegal run with NEVER INSPECTED GAMBLING MACHINES (regular computers with absolutely no security)
Picked winners. and moreso - federal money never disbursed for the reason it was allocated. Who would trust dems to pick republicans?
Furthermore, using HUD as a "cheap and democrat controlled Long & Foster". They aren't doing HUD work they are trying to make a government run real estate company that buy property with federal money and rents to people who do not need aide (ie, friendly gov co-workers).
Legitimate other articles? Yes here's a glimpse ...
An official with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) said she was replaced in her role after she refused to fund a redecoration of Secretary Ben Carson's office.
HUD secretary proposes raising rent for low-income Americans
House Oversight Panel Asks HUD For Documents Amid ... - KERA News
Howard Husock, vice president for policy research at the conservative Manhattan Institute, heavily criticized Section 8 in a 2003 book on housing policy
as a vehicle for exporting inner city social problems to the suburbs
Democrats use up to 100,000 PICKED WINNERS (democrats) to run HUD in VA (certainly a thousands, and estimation how many gov workers are benefitting via job ties instead of who is supposed to benefit: tricky, because they are tricky). By 2030 you would guess closer to 100k than 10k. "getting in the housing committee" is a trophy position of housing for nothing: everyone will want "in".
They are doing it in a manner to support the wealthy in TWO MAJOR WAYS:
(1) to use HUD money to rent to those who don't need housing aide (well paid government workers and HUD family). To use federal money and LAND SEIZURE to add to the land base those employees use (ie for their own family / extended family). To prevent legal defense of those getting land seized.
(2) TO RENT LAND ON BEHALF OF WEALTHY GOVERNMENT OWNERS: replacing Long & Foster and RE/MAX in exactly the same manner Obama replaced "the healthcare industry" (which Kamala Harris plans to eliminate by law: white private medicine - isn't it strange a Virginian doctor would sign up for that plan?)
(Kamala has nearly seized this too)
They also now doing the same thing with Power (the power company bills), meaning it's quite sure gov workers who got HUD help also get power bills paid but have income SOME TIMES HIGHER THAN POVERTY LEVEL of people needing shelter.
There are a growing number of legitiate articles claiming that's exactly what Pelosi democrats are doing and have already done.
(the lottery is new - but so was vegas at one time)
There's no "we" here, there's "democrats win, anyone else maybe dies"
I would like to hear WTOP (tokyo rose) and Pelosi (who is getting $$$$ contracts to run such lotteries inside VA - which is interstate fraud) wiggle their way out of this one.
Why WMAL has never hounded new democrat HUD and "guaranteed government wages (ie, fcps teacher pay, PE teachers making ~ $100k/yr), well, I wonder. Perhaps fear.
The "core problem" is rich gov workers running all these scams. since Bill Clinton they are no longer "government servants" by law.
With that problem added, what comes in the door is privately RICH democrats who turn the "system" into serving the rich - and the "well paid" gov workers (fear to object, put too nicely).
To a fairfax citizen a perspective is (although i hate analogies): they take the ball off the field and accuse you of not attempting to make progress with the ball down the field while they claim whether they did is "protected information".
ANOTHER BENEFIT TO THE RICH IS NOT PAYING WAGES TO THOSE IN REALLY BAD (NON-HUD) HOUSING ON FOOD STAMPS. THAT ALSO IS WHAT NORTHAM DEMOCRATS ARE AFTER.
But republicans have put that (directly above) in the News - so let's not say they haven't.
There is no chance - there is just picked winners and seizure.
Death? Yes, if democrats evict you, you loose all your stuff and can die
It is a death lottery there is no doubt - and the "lottery" is not inspected for cheating and run from another state (and - legally, canada too)
you can die by being cut off from food stamps (being homeless you have zero chance of fighting it in court, and no time to live - 7 days if your healthy as a horse, but a few if your not)
you can die from FREEZING WEATHER
you can die from GETTING MUGGED BY DEMOCRATS
you can die from prison - during obama 1/2 of all white prisoners "there for a stay" committed suicide in va prison due to heinous conditions - some think perhaps forced medical drug induced
you can not only die - anyone with a motive of having seized your property is going to help insure it happens
National News: donator donates housing to 70 homeless (ps. no doubt fed funds and would be jailed if he didn't, is my guess)
Deep freeze death toll climbs to 13 - ABC7 Chicago
(it's 15 dead now, in the chicago lottery, VA admits to over 3 in fairfax alone)
If you did save for the future in life and need to defend against seizure
Fx courts insure you, by law, loose anything you possibly save by objecting to seizure (due to insanely high court fees).
IT'S ALL RACKETEERING (a law against it, but you need a judge that isn't tied into gov worker favoritism)
They (hoteliers in usa, perhaps including trump) stand a firm chance of government seizure by people like Kamal Harris to (cause their hud finding deficit to balance).
Say goodbye to hotels too (not just to private healthcare option).
Can abortion be a death lottery? Yes that too.
Some babies get born, others are used for body parts - that's a death lottery too.
One controlled by careful social pressure in HS and money
A more historic death lottery: the old West in california - gamblers were dying from losses but also opium (there are photos of the sheriff taking a sledge hammer to gamblign devices). Can America have too many casinos? Yes - it's happened before. Can it kill? Many enough for intervention.