nwkxg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RegionWatcher Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > uk73y Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > RegionWatcher Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sir - I applaud his approach to arguing that
> > > incredibly botched series of calls. First
> they
> > > pick-up the obvious and flagrant intentional
> > > grounding on Scounty. They threw the flag!
> > Then
> > > the very next series they call intentional
> > > grounding on LB. The ball was clearly thrown
> > > right into a group of players. It is highly
> > > irregular for a ref to make the judgement
> call
> > > that it was intentional grounding in such a
> > > situation. Very irregular. Sure it was a
> > rushed
> > > pass but one never sees that called grounding.
>
> > > And then the pass interference on #27.
> > Absototal
> > > bullshit. That was a great defensive play -
> > there
> > > was no grab no push - a great move to get
> > inside
> > > position and a great turn and deflection. It
> > > couldn't have been done better. And no, I am
> > not
> > > a LB fan.
> >
> > It is obvious you really do not understand the
> > rules of football. In HS, when the qb is under
> > pressure, he has to throw the ball “in the
> > vicinity” of an “eligible” receiver. The
> LB
> > QB drilled the ball into the ground at the feet
> of
> > his linemen. None of them were eligible
> > receivers, and he was clearly attempting to
> avoid
> > a sack. So its grounding. The SoCo QB was
> moving
> > and threw a pass toward an eligible receiver.
> The
> > referees mechanics on that play is to throw the
> > flag, then converse with the wing officials to
> > determine if there was an eligible receiver in
> the
> > area. That is why the flag was picked up. If
> you
> > ever watch football, you’ll see that from
> time
> > to time.
> >
> > As for the PI, the move to “get inside”
> > involved grabbing the receiver and interfering
> > with his movement to the ball. By definition,
> > pass interference.
> >
> > While I agree there are times coaches owe it to
> > their players to take up for them, and there
> are
> > times to get an USL, I stand by what I say
> about
> > him going onto the field. If that wasn’t a
> > Regional Final game, he would have been flagged
> > immediately. If he were coaching at most other
> > schools in the county, he would have been
> ejected.
> > A coach can’t run onto the field like that.
> > Never. Ever.
>
> That's correct. I've never watched a game before
> and I don't know the rules at all. I just made
> all that up because I'm stupid.
>
> Man, what a pompous ass you are. I know the
> rules. I just happen not to agree with your
> interpretation of what happened. Especially with
> the PI. I was about 10 yards from the ref. There
> was absolutely NO GRABBING or interference with
> his movement to the ball other than he got inside
> and was in better position to make a play on the
> ball. I know why the ref called PI. The only
> reason was because at the trailing end of the play
> he had his hand on the WR back. Totally
> incidental but the ref looked at the hand and
> threw the flag. It was a colossal injustice.
if anyone wants to see the play, I believe this is the one. (Don't know if it will pull up on here or just link it).
https://twitter.com/NoahFrankWTOP/status/1200510780438974464
To me, this is clear as day DPI and possibly a TD saving penalty. Clearly pulled him back and impeded his route.
I haven't seen a clear shot of the other possible DPI (on SC) so I cannot comment on that one.