Executive Summary --
We find strong evidence that a DNA sample of primarily European descent also
contains Native American ancestry from an ancestor in the sample’s pedigree 6
-10 generations ago. We find little or no evidence of African ancestry in this sample.

Will the disgusting slimeball Trump now pay off on his million-dollar boast? Or will he cower and run away?

The actual numbers could be anywhere from 1/64 to 1/1024. Regardless, all this DNA test proved is that Warren has no more claim to Indian heritage than the average white American.

https://www.infowars.com/elizabeth-warren-melts-down-in-wake-of-dna-disaster/

Warren tested 99.5% European (Indian tribes typically require 25% ancestry, NOT less than .5%)

OP, pretty much every whitey has at least the same amount.

Is a member of their tribe, the US gave them rights to do that under treaties sending them to Indian reservations

Not The Democrat Party Liz The Fake or YOU OP Or any other Democrat

The Cherokee Nation Has stated Liz is not a member of our tribe

Let's see what the real indians have to say...
Attachments:

‘Tribes’ are not based on genetics. Warren is definitively descended from Native American entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usual.

Imagine that... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ‘Tribes’ are not based on genetics. Warren is
> definitively descended from Native American
> entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usual.


By that logic we've all got a lil nigger in us, so where are the reparations?

No Native American tribes would call her Native American ,nor would she be granted privileges of tribal membership.
Amongst American Indians she is white.
Amongst white Democrats/ delusionists ,she is Indian.
Fractionally black activists have been playing this game for decades.
Sad and funny at the same time.

Malcolm Xtra Black Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> By that logic we've all got a lil nigger in us, so
> where are the reparations?

Every person currently alive in the world is a descendant of a single East African black woman who lived some 200,000 years ago.

Imagine that... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warren is definitively descended from Native American
> entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usual.

This would seem to be a yes-or-no question, and the clear answer in this case is yes.

You got it... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Malcolm Xtra Black Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > By that logic we've all got a lil nigger in us,
> so
> > where are the reparations?
>
> Every person currently alive in the world is a
> descendant of a single East African black woman
> who lived some 200,000 years ago.

Her name Leshaniqua Biggs.

.
Attachments:

Survey says... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Imagine that... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Warren is definitively descended from Native
> American
> > entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usual.
>
> This would seem to be a yes-or-no question, and
> the clear answer in this case is yes.

You’re a fucking retard.

Survey Says Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Survey says... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Imagine that... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Warren is definitively descended from Native
> > American
> > > entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usual.
> >
> > This would seem to be a yes-or-no question, and
> > the clear answer in this case is yes.
>
> You’re a fucking retard.


Looks like you are to stupid to know what a retard is

I would say about 85 percent of American whites and 95 percent of American blacks have MORE Indian ancestry than Warren. I am shocked at the low percentage.

Kek
Attachments:

Lots of bad math and bad reporting on this story. In fact the DNA test shows that Warren’s family was correct.

DNA tests show that OP is 100% bullshit.

Cranky Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DNA tests show that OP is 100% bullshit.


But MeeMaw and PawPaw said it was true?

They were right.

OP has 1/1024th of a brain. Average for a libtard.

Gerrymanderer2 DNC Democrat posts several lies on FFU daily.

Warrens' test, reported by news agency Breitbart PROVED SHE IS NOT INDIAN even remotely.

Fact is... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They were right.


So you're saying that race is genetic.

Good to know.

What Difference Does It Make ??

The Cherokee Nation says she not a member of their tribe, she's a LIAR and a Fake!

I guess the Democrats are going to start playing Democrats against the Indians

Why do liberals hate people who are right like the Cherokee Nation of native Americans?? As in Right not Wrong

Give a leftist enough time and they will destroy themselves with their lies
As Liz has done.

Presidential hell no a fake! who used her "Indian Heritage" to bypass others to get into a college to steal a seat away from another deserving student ! That's worse then a FAKE That's a THIEF!

From Wiki "In April 2012, The Boston Globe sparked a campaign controversy by reporting that from 1986 to 1995 Warren had listed herself as a racial minority in the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Directory of Law Teachers.[33]"

So she has high cheek bones, WTF So Do I and millions of others !

Who in the hell wants a leftist Liar Fake and Thief as The US President ? Or as a person serving in any political position ? Open the asylum doors to get some hands up

> > ‘Tribes’ are not based on genetics. Warren
> is
> > definitively descended from Native American
> > entities. She wins. Trump loses, as usu
>
> By that logic we've all got a lil nigger in us, so
> where are the reparations?

Reparations for niggers:

1. Affirmative action

2. Food stamps (SNAP)
Attachments:

Dixie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who in the hell wants a leftist Liar Fake and
> Thief as The US President ?

I hate to break it to you, but the answer is:
other leftist liars and fakes and thieves

...which is about 1/2 the country.

They're called "Democrats"; that's the polite term.
You insensitive racist.

Who gives a fuck about this stupid shit?

— Calling BS

No one gives a shit about what you said

Why Did You Bother To Post Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No one gives a shit about what you said

Did I hurt your feelings? Another fucking cuck on here.

— Calling BS

Whaddyaknow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So you're saying that race is genetic. Good to know.

It would be good if you knew one single thing about all this. But of course, you don't, as has previously been shown in rather devastating fashion. What this current Warren Report says meanwhile is that in a predominantly European DNA profile, there is strong evidence that the subject has at least one ancestor with DNA classifiable as Native American. She is thus descended from such. It is similarly true that the actress Eva Longoria -- whose family has lived on the banks of the Rio Grande for centuries -- has an ancestor with DNA classifiable as Chinese. She is in fact related to Yo Yo Ma. Go figure. Well, that's actually too tall an order for you, so just never mind.

Dixie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Cherokee Nation says she not a member of their
> tribe, she's a LIAR and a Fake!

You're almost as stupid as the other guy. Tribal membership for the Cherokee and most other North American tribes is a socio-cultural state based on habit and tribal lore.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Whaddyaknow Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So you're saying that race is genetic. Good to
> know.
>
> It would be good if you knew one single thing
> about all this. But of course, you don't, as has
> previously been shown in rather devastating
> fashion. What this current Warren Report says
> meanwhile is that in a predominantly European DNA
> profile, there is strong evidence that the subject
> has at least one ancestor with DNA classifiable as
> Native American. She is thus descended from such.
> It is similarly true that the actress Eva Longoria
> -- whose family has lived on the banks of the Rio
> Grande for centuries -- has an ancestor with DNA
> classifiable as Chinese. She is in fact related
> to Yo Yo Ma. Go figure. Well, that's actually
> too tall an order for you, so just never mind.


So if race is just a 'social construct' how could DNA tell you anything?

Genetically speaking, race eimply does not exist in human beings. Many people are able to grasp the rather elementary science behind the fact. Some of course are not able to grasp that much. They fall instead into a trap built of variations in adaptive traits because it suits their ingrained personal biases. Not very clever, but it’s the most that some can manage.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Genetically speaking, race eimply does not exist
> in human beings. Many people are able to grasp the
> rather elementary science behind the fact. Some of
> course are not able to grasp that much. They fall
> instead into a trap built of variations in
> adaptive traits because it suits their ingrained
> personal biases. Not very clever, but it’s the
> most that some can manage.


Then how does looking at her DNA indicate anything about Warren's European and Native American ancestry?

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Genetically speaking, race eimply does not exist

That is semantics.

There are definitely sets of genetic traits that can be grouped together
to define something most people would call "race". For example, having
black skin is genetic, and those people are the "black race". There are
genetic variations that are only found in descendants of one particular
Jewish priest who lived thousands of years ago: "Jew", for sure.
Obviously your genetics determine what "race" you are.

But what constitutes someone being of a particular "race" is subjective.

Warren has genetics that say that somewhere, very long ago, she had some
ancestor who was probably an indian. The question is, does that make her
claim to "be" a Cherokee indian true? The answer is "No", according to
the people of the Cherokee indian tribe. There's no evidence that it was
Cherokee, anyway, but even if it was, that's not what the tribes consider
to be enough for membership.

More to the point, does Warren's genetic profile support any of her
claims to be a disadvantaged minority -- or even that anyone in her
family for the last 180 years was such a person?
The answer is: "No. That is DISPROVEN by her DNA analysis."
She might possibly have had one ancestor who lived about 300 years ago.
Maybe.

LIEAWATHA

racistgenes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is semantics.

It’s science.

> There are definitely sets of genetic traits that
> can be grouped together to define something most
> people would call "race".

Most people have no clue.

> For example, having black skin is genetic, and
> those people are the "black race".

Sort of like the blue-eyed race or the curly-haired race or the left-handed race? This is all one big example of confirmation bias. You see that which you want to see, never caring what it is that actually appears before you.

> Warren has genetics that say that somewhere, very long ago, she had some
> ancestor who was probably an indian.

No, not an Indian. An American as opposed to a European.

> The question is, does that make her
> claim to "be" a Cherokee indian true?

Her claim is that she was told of having such heritage. All the test confirms is that whether known or not, there was sound basis for that family lore.

> More to the point, does Warren's genetic profile
> support any of her go aims to be a disadvantaged
> minority...

She has not made such claims. She has only noted what she was told. There is no instance of her expecting or claiming anything special to come from that.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> > For example, having black skin is genetic, and
> > those people are the "black race".
>
> Sort of like the blue-eyed race or the
> curly-haired race or the left-handed race? This
> is all one big example of confirmation bias. You
> see that which you want to see, never caring what
> it is that actually appears before you.

No, more like European, African, Asian, Native American, and Pacific Islander. Which are used both by governments and for other social purposes as well as by researchers. For obvious reasons that your own confirmation bias prevents you from seeing.


> > The question is, does that make her
> > claim to "be" a Cherokee indian true?
>
> Her claim is that she was told of having such
> heritage. All the test confirms is that whether
> known or not, there was sound basis for that
> family lore.

No, there is not actually. No more so than for the vast majority of the US population of European ancestry.

What it does say that there is a genetic basis for 'race;' otherwise, there could be no such determination based on her DNA.

Why do libtarded libtards deny science?

Yaknownothing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What it does say that there is a genetic basis for 'race;'
> otherwise, there could be no such determination based on her DNA.

If you understood the English language, you would long ago have realized that race is a social construct based in the minds of mental weaklings on centuries worth of really bad guessing. What a DNA test can meanwhile reveal is ancestry. See if you can get a leaf in that.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > More to the point, does Warren's genetic
> profile support any of her go aims to be a disadvantaged minority...
>
> She has not made such claims. She has only noted
> what she was told. There is no instance of her
> expecting or claiming anything special to come from that.

It does not matter where she got the idea from,
the fact is that SHE TOLD several institutions and employers
that - for the purpose of minority advantage treatment quotas --
that she was a Cherokee indian. She also told stories (which seem
to be all lies) about recent family members being discriminated
against because of the indian blood. She further made political
statements qualifying herself as "a person of color" and "indian"
and being a personal example of a discriminated minority.

Of course, all of it was untrue; she's a liar.

Now you're claiming that she shouldn't be blamed because
(a) those facts never happened -- you deny reality, and
(b) she is a vitim of some sort: because she didn't know better.

Do you think she's that much of an idiot?
Or is she just a manipulating politician?
They are fully aware of their lies, they just figure that they won't
get caught, and if they do, people like you will overlook it all.

Pathetic.


Let us not forget the cookbooks she authored. purporting to her
own indian family recipes. They were lifted, word for word,
from other cookbooks. And they were not indian. They were French.
Why she didn't think she would get caught doing this...
well, maybe she is really that stupid.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yaknownothing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What it does say that there is a genetic basis
> for 'race;'
> > otherwise, there could be no such determination
> based on her DNA.
>
> If you understood the English language, you would
> long ago have realized that race is a social
> construct based in the minds of mental weaklings
> on centuries worth of really bad guessing. What a
> DNA test can meanwhile reveal is ancestry. See if
> you can get a leaf in that.


"Race" is the general expression that we use to characterize phenotypes within the human population reflecting differences in geographic ancestry. Genetics uses the same basis in classifications at a top level (with more fine distinctions below if one wants). Can you guess why? I'll save you the fumbling for more nonsense to post. It's because those phenotypes are the expression of differences in genotypes which can be resolved at a genetic level which are inherited along the same lines of geographic ancestry. There is no operative difference.

Saying that something is a "social construct" is babble that says nothing. The scientific method itself is a "social construct." Taxonomy is a "social construct." Because something is a "social construct" doesn't mean that it's invalid or that it doesn't exist otherwise.

Yaknownothing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Way too stupid... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yaknownothing Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > What it does say that there is a genetic
> basis
> > for 'race;'
> > > otherwise, there could be no such
> determination
> > based on her DNA.
> >
> > If you understood the English language, you
> would
> > long ago have realized that race is a social
> > construct based in the minds of mental
> weaklings
> > on centuries worth of really bad guessing. What
> a
> > DNA test can meanwhile reveal is ancestry. See
> if
> > you can get a leaf in that.
>
>
> "Race" is the general expression that we use to
> characterize phenotypes within the human
> population reflecting differences in geographic
> ancestry. Genetics uses the same basis in
> classifications at a top level (with more fine
> distinctions below if one wants). Can you guess
> why? I'll save you the fumbling for more nonsense
> to post. It's because those phenotypes are the
> expression of differences in genotypes which can
> be resolved at a genetic level which are inherited
> along the same lines of geographic ancestry.
> There is no operative difference.
>
> Saying that something is a "social construct" is
> babble that says nothing. The scientific method
> itself is a "social construct." Taxonomy is a
> "social construct." Because something is a
> "social construct" doesn't mean that it's invalid
> or that it doesn't exist otherwise.


Do you have a point?

Blah blah blah, she is a liar and a thief, not Cherokee. End of story, now fuck off libtards.

Jeep Cherokees have more Native American DNA than she does.

President Coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Executive Summary --
> We find strong evidence that a DNA sample of
> primarily European descent also
> contains Native American ancestry from an ancestor
> in the sample’s pedigree 6
> -10 generations ago. We find little or no
> evidence of African ancestry in this sample.
>
> Will the disgusting slimeball Trump now pay off on
> his million-dollar boast? Or will he cower and
> run away?

^ Prime example of the term “Libtarded”

Now the Democrats/Progressives/Communists are calling the Cherokee Nation a bunch of racists.

Wow!

It's either the democrat/progressive/Communist way or you're a racist.

Fuck that bullshit!

I couldn’t vote for Trump last time because I thought he was disgusting.

I will vote for him next time because I at least know where he stands and what I’m getting.

I’ll keep my mouth shut about it though, as liberals have become increasingly violent and deranged.

What a bizarre woman Warren is. Total fake. Definitely not presidential material. Go back to your teepee bitch.

Yaknownothing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Race" is the general expression that we use to characterize
> phenotypes within the human population reflecting differences
> in geographic ancestry.

'Bullshit' is the general expression that we use to characterize the errant tripe and babbling of uneducated worthless dumbshits -- particularly the types who hang their shit on slop from fringe hate-groups like the American College of Pediatricians.

> Genetics uses the same basis in classifications at a top level
> (with more fine distinctions below if one wants). Can you
> guess why? I'll save you the fumbling for more nonsense to post.
> It's because those phenotypes are the expression of differences
> in genotypes which can be resolved at a genetic level which are
> inherited along the same lines of geographic ancestry. There is
> no operative difference.

You have presented here exactly no basis at all for the existence of 'race' in human beings, and there will never come a time when you will be able to accomplish that. All you do is type away furiously about variations in adaptive traits. You seem blind to the complete failure and utter inefficacy in scientific terms of your entire approach.

> Saying that something is a "social construct" is
> babble that says nothing. The scientific method
> itself is a "social construct." Taxonomy is a
> "social construct." Because something is a
> "social construct" doesn't mean that it's invalid
> or that it doesn't exist otherwise.

In genetic terms, there is no such thing as race in human beings. That you can't accept this simple scientific fact says all that anyone would actually need to know about you.

Executive Summary --
We find strong evidence that a DNA sample of primarily European descent also
contains Native American ancestry from an ancestor in the sample’s pedigree 6
-10 generations ago. We find little or no evidence of African ancestry in this sample.

The last word... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Executive Summary --
> We find strong evidence that a DNA sample of
> primarily European descent also
> contains Native American ancestry from an ancestor
> in the sample’s pedigree 6
> -10 generations ago. We find little or no evidence
> of African ancestry in this sample.

Not enough to classify her as Native American.

Yo, asshole. "Native American" (according to Native Americans) is not actually defined by genetics. You've heard that of course but are just too fucking dumb to understand what it means. For her part, Warren had only claimed family lore of having Native American ancestors. She has probably reported her astrological sign somewhere as well. But in neither case has she claimed or received any special status or concession as the result.

LIEAWATHA

^^^ TRAINED SEAL hoping for some dead fish. It's amazing that people-pretenders go about making such public displays of themselves.