Just remember...



The MSM, The Hollywood elites, The DC insiders don't hate Trump; They hate YOU

They told you who to vote for, and You didn't.

They told you how to think. and you ignored them.

They told you to hate Trump, and you defied them.

They hate YOU because you broke the conditioning.

They hate YOU because you don't vote how they tell you.

They hate YOU because you publicly disagree with them.

When dingbats like Stephen Colbert are bashing Trump, his contempt is actually for YOU, the people who voted for him.

Remember now and always. The MSM, Hollywood, and the DC elites since the 60's have been calling YOU racists, sexist, theocrats, hatemongers, etc.

They encouraged the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots and cheered as people were attacked and neighborhoods burned.

They encouraged and PAID thugs to attack Trump supporters at rallies.

They celebrated shutting the Chicago Trump rally down with violence.

They celebrated paid goons and Antifa shutting down free speech.

THEY ENCOURAGE VIOLENCE AGAINST YOU!

It isn't Trump they hate and fear, it is YOU because you do not follow their instructions


THEY
HATE
YOU

But.. but... Venezuela is utopia!

Socialism is no longer the dirty word it was during the Cold War. Every industrialized nation in the world could be characterized as Socialist and most are doing fine. Why do people on the right insist we continue to live in a state beholden to corporate shills who care nothing for the common citizen and only for the bottom line?

Need to call the Republicans that since they are going to hand out those welfare checks to farmers!

Hoover Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Socialism is no longer the dirty word it was
> during the Cold War. Every industrialized nation
> in the world could be characterized as Socialist
> and most are doing fine. Why do people on the
> right insist we continue to live in a state
> beholden to corporate shills who care nothing for
> the common citizen and only for the bottom line?


You mean like the Obamas.

Really! What happened to the Invsible Hand?

socialist is just newspeak for totalitarian communism.

democrats are not actually communists.

democrats are the useful idiots who are used to usher in communism...
the useful idiots who think they will rule in utopia...
the useful idiots are very surprised when they are the first ones lined up against the wall

the communist dictators are NOT stupid and they realize that the idiots will only be a pain when they wake up that they were lied to and so they are shot and dissappeared...happens in every marxist takeover

People have been saying this stupid shit for 20 plus years. Pure Bullshit lol!

People on the right are just generally stupid. Every successful modern economy is importantly based on socialism. Might better be called managed capitalism, but the Eek! A mouse! effect makes using socialism worthwhile.

Of course they use violence. Negroes and spics nothing new.

Jesus, it must suck to be one of these bedwetting conservative jerkoffs who still think the Red Army is gonna march through their little town and send them to the gulag if they don't fall in line. "Socialism" as you call it, at least facets of it work normally in virtually every corner of the developed world with minimal issues. Why are they so scared of it? If this is such an issue for you all, just stay under the covers in your double-wide and don't come out. The world will function fine without you.

.
Attachments:

Germany was run by the national socialist workers party from 1933 to 1945 and that socialist experiment didn’t work out to well, did it?

If you were less stupid, you might’ve kept yourself from posting that.

Closet dwellers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> People on the right are just generally stupid.
> Every successful modern economy is importantly
> based on socialism. Might better be called managed
> capitalism, but the Eek! A mouse! effect makes
> using socialism worthwhile.


As are idiots who believe that actual socialism would ever work in the US.

Let me explain how the real world works for a fantasy land dreamer like you. The only cases where any form of "Democratic socialism" works (outside of communistic dictatorship labeled as such where most end up) are where there are relatively small populations of mostly all productive people. Generally a fairly homogeneous population in some substantial way that causes unity toward a common good and goals. Many examples like that on a small scale. And/or where there is some large outside source of revenue to support the population at a level meeting or exceeding internal needs (e.g.,North Sea oil to Norway, oil for Venezuela until it broke down).

That's not the US. We have way too large and diverse of a population, too many varied goals/common interests as a result, and far too many unproductive people more who would become unproductive other than by force to ever make it work. And there's no magic outside deep pocket to fund it. The closest that we have is our business base which is what generates the money to pay for the social programs that we have.

History Professor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Germany was run by the national socialist workers
> party from 1933 to 1945 and that socialist
> experiment didn’t work out to well, did it?


The NSDAP was socialist in name only, especially after the leftist faction of the party led by Gregor Strasser was liquidated during the night of the long knives in 1934. If you are going to reference history, at least get your facts straight.

Ffxu historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> History Professor Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Germany was run by the national socialist
> workers
> > party from 1933 to 1945 and that socialist
> > experiment didn’t work out to well, did it?
>
>
> The NSDAP was socialist in name only, especially
> after the leftist faction of the party led by
> Gregor Strasser was liquidated during the night of
> the long knives in 1934. If you are going to
> reference history, at least get your facts
> straight.

You might want to check your history Doc. The nazis regulated industries, nationalized education and health services, instituted strick gun control . Sounds like socialism to me.

Say no to Socialism Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just remember...
>
>
>
> The MSM, The Hollywood elites, The DC insiders
> don't hate Trump; They hate YOU
>
> They told you who to vote for, and You didn't.
>
> They told you how to think. and you ignored them.
>
> They told you to hate Trump, and you defied them.
>
> They hate YOU because you broke the conditioning.
>
> They hate YOU because you don't vote how they tell
> you.
>
> They hate YOU because you publicly disagree with
> them.
>
> When dingbats like Stephen Colbert are bashing
> Trump, his contempt is actually for YOU, the
> people who voted for him.
>
> Remember now and always. The MSM, Hollywood, and
> the DC elites since the 60's have been calling YOU
> racists, sexist, theocrats, hatemongers, etc.
>
> They encouraged the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots
> and cheered as people were attacked and
> neighborhoods burned.
>
> They encouraged and PAID thugs to attack Trump
> supporters at rallies.
>
> They celebrated shutting the Chicago Trump rally
> down with violence.
>
> They celebrated paid goons and Antifa shutting
> down free speech.
>
> THEY ENCOURAGE VIOLENCE AGAINST YOU!
>
> It isn't Trump they hate and fear, it is YOU
> because you do not follow their instructions
>
>
> THEY
> HATE
> YOU
Attachments:

History Professor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ffxu historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > History Professor Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Germany was run by the national socialist
> > workers
> > > party from 1933 to 1945 and that socialist
> > > experiment didn’t work out to well, did it?
> >
> >
> > The NSDAP was socialist in name only,
> especially
> > after the leftist faction of the party led by
> > Gregor Strasser was liquidated during the night
> of
> > the long knives in 1934. If you are going to
> > reference history, at least get your facts
> > straight.
>
> You might want to check your history Doc. The
> nazis regulated industries, nationalized education
> and health services, instituted strick gun control
> . Sounds like socialism to me.

The US has put regulations on industry and institutes gun control as well. Does that make us socialist too?

Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As are idiots who believe that actual socialism
> would ever work in the US.

LOL! Goober can't even DEFINE socialism in the modern world. You'll just crash and burn right off the bat by talking about 'ownership of the means of production.' That's an immediate sign of a disqualifying level of ignorance. Try explaining the socio-economic principles behind traffic lights instead.

> Let me explain how the real world works for a
> fantasy land dreamer like you.

LOL! You are an impotent dweeb who is not even minimally qualified to the task. You have no knowledge or experience in this field whatsoever.

> The only cases where any form of "Democratic socialism"
> works (outside of communistic dictatorship labeled as
> such where most end up) are where there are relatively small
> populations of mostly all productive people.

Come on, goober! That's the biggest, most worn out cop out of all time. The problem here is not one of scale, but rather of the fact that your side has no clue at all as to how an economy needs to be run. This is the truth that lies behind the fact that there has not been an economically successful Republican administration in more than 100 years. Assuming that it can persist at all, the current one is not likely to break the spell.

Now go back to watching Paw Patrol.

Socialism is organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.

That’s just as awful a definition as mIght have been expected from a worthless dilettante. Go read a book or take a class.

Report card.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As are idiots who believe that actual socialism
> > would ever work in the US.
>
> LOL! Goober can't even DEFINE socialism in the
> modern world. You'll just crash and burn right
> off the bat by talking about 'ownership of the
> means of production.' That's an immediate sign of
> a disqualifying level of ignorance. Try
> explaining the socio-economic principles behind
> traffic lights instead.


Socialism is easy to define. The problem is that you idiots only want to define a completely unrealistic vision of it which conveniently excludes any negative aspects and reality that happen along the way. lol


> > Let me explain how the real world works for a
> > fantasy land dreamer like you.
>
> LOL! You are an impotent dweeb who is not even
> minimally qualified to the task. You have no
> knowledge or experience in this field whatsoever.
>
> > The only cases where any form of "Democratic
> socialism"
> > works (outside of communistic dictatorship
> labeled as
> > such where most end up) are where there are
> relatively small
> > populations of mostly all productive people.
>
> Come on, goober! That's the biggest, most worn
> out cop out of all time. The problem here is not
> one of scale, but rather of the fact that your
> side has no clue at all as to how an economy needs
> to be run. This is the truth that lies behind the
> fact that there has not been an economically
> successful Republican administration in more than
> 100 years. Assuming that it can persist at all,
> the current one is not likely to break the spell.
>
>
> Now go back to watching Paw Patrol.

Blah blah blah political bullshit blah blah blah. This isn't a partisan political matter. No side has any realistic clue how to run such a government or economy that would apply in the case of the US. Even at a state level. Even for only a smaller single area of the government/economy. As an example, you can look to CA's proposed single-payer healthcare system. Why was that, in a Democratic state with a Democratic legislature and by a Democratic governor, completely abandoned again?

Why is Johnny Depp in that photo montage?

Trump redistributing Tax Dollars to Farmers and Factory owners as Tariff Tax Compensation - paying them billions. Socialism defined. Only thing better for Republicans is Train-Raping 15 year olds.

I've always said I was a commie, pinko, socialist. Barry was far too conservative for me.

History Professor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> You might want to check your history Doc. The
> nazis regulated industries, nationalized education
> and health services, instituted strick gun control
> . Sounds like socialism to me.

That's the kind of argument I expect from someone who looks at the world through post-Reagan American glasses. If gun control was a sign of socialism then most towns in the old west were socialist. If industrial and commercial regulation are socialist the founding fathers were socialist.

Germany had a history of gun control. Nazi gun restrictions for the average German were less restrictive than the restrictions under Weimar or Imperial Germany. Public health care in Germany happened during the era of that raging socialist Otto Von Bismarck. The 19th century had seen nations across Europe trying to wrest control of education from the church.

Pinkos

Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Socialism is easy to define. The problem is that
> you idiots only want to define a completely
> unrealistic vision of it which conveniently
> excludes any negative aspects and reality that
> happen along the way. lol

That's simply stupid. You don't actually know a damned thing about socio-economics and can only babble puerile nonsense such as the above. Systems that you mindless reactionaries would call Socialism are all that has ever worked over any significant period of time, and are all that is ever likely to work. And of all the possible worse alternatives, none may be worse than the dingbat idea of laissez-faire, free-market capitalism. That just fills the space defined by the phrase "Worst Possible Choice"

> Blah blah blah political bullshit blah blah blah.
> This isn't a partisan political matter. No side
> has any realistic clue how to run such a government
> or economy that would apply in the case of the US.

Open your eyes, little boy. This and every other successful modern economy is importantly based on socialism. You are so many cards short of a full deck that you aren't able even to understand what it is that we have already. Paw Patrol awaits you.

All you socialists are just Gerry sock puppets.

Read this before watching any flavor of FOX News (OAN, The Blaze, Newsmax, etc.)...

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/ivytech-engl112/chapter/formal-and-informal-fallacies/

Capitalism Cal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All you socialists are just Gerry sock puppets.

No, you're just too rote fucking dumb to come up with anything better than that. Ask your equally uninformed pal to explain to you what's been going on on Paw Patrol. With help, you can pick it up.

“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”

-- Adam Smith

Report card.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Socialism is easy to define. The problem is
> that
> > you idiots only want to define a completely
> > unrealistic vision of it which conveniently
> > excludes any negative aspects and reality that
> > happen along the way. lol
>
> That's simply stupid. You don't actually know a
> damned thing about socio-economics and can only
> babble puerile nonsense such as the above.
> Systems that you mindless reactionaries would call
> Socialism are all that has ever worked over any
> significant period of time, and are all that is
> ever likely to work. And of all the possible
> worse alternatives, none may be worse than the
> dingbat idea of laissez-faire, free-market
> capitalism. That just fills the space defined by
> the phrase "Worst Possible Choice"

More blah blah blah. There are socialistic and capitalistic aspects to virtually all countries and forms of government. The Chinese are the best capitalists on the planet at the moment. Modern "socialist" Scandinavian countries that you always like to point to do not exist without various "capitalist" structures. If you're going to try to use longevity as your metric, then monarchies and other totalitarian forms "worked" for far longer than any other system. And, as always as I said, you're doing the typical dumb bullshit of selectively picking only what you like and holding that up as your definition of "socialism" while contrasting that with some completely unrealistic all-in free-market capitalism. Same shit that ideologues like you always do.

>
> > Blah blah blah political bullshit blah blah
> blah.
> > This isn't a partisan political matter. No
> side
> > has any realistic clue how to run such a
> government
> > or economy that would apply in the case of the
> US.
>
> Open your eyes, little boy. This and every other
> successful modern economy is importantly based on
> socialism. You are so many cards short of a full
> deck that you aren't able even to understand what
> it is that we have already. Paw Patrol awaits you.


Open your own head. With a hammer. This and every other successful modern economy is equally based on capitalism as well. Your fantasy world doesn't exist. Never will. Where it's been attempted more in the directions that you dream of, it's generally turned into a nightmare.

Trump Cuts Revenues and then gives away our tax dollars to farmers and industry hurt by his Tariffs. Socialism

Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Open your own head. With a hammer. This and
> every other successful modern economy is equally
> based on capitalism as well. Your fantasy world
> doesn't exist. Never will. Where it's been
> attempted more in the directions that you dream
> of, it's generally turned into a nightmare.

It in the long run, it doesn’t pay to be a dumbshit. Global capitalism failed 125 years ago. Get with the program.

Yo, nitwit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lolipop Land Dwellers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Open your own head. With a hammer. This and
> > every other successful modern economy is
> equally
> > based on capitalism as well. Your fantasy
> world
> > doesn't exist. Never will. Where it's been
> > attempted more in the directions that you dream
> > of, it's generally turned into a nightmare.
>
> It in the long run, it doesn’t pay to be a
> dumbshit. Global capitalism failed 125 years ago.
> Get with the program.



As realistic as your worldview...

It’s just amazing how dumb some people are.

Yo, nitwit... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It’s just amazing how dumb some people are.


^^^

.
Attachments:

The U.S. has had a socialist government since 1913 with the inauguration of Wilson.

LOL cock gobbling liberal loser keep LOSING right and left! LOLOLOL! Foggots!!!

Yo, nitwit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It in the long run, it doesn’t pay to be a dumbshit.
> Global capitalism failed 125 years ago. Get with
> the program.

I was surprised to be googled into this at a place so apparently vapid as this one. The point made is of course entirely correct. The rapid succession of serious panics, recessions, and depressions that began (for the sake of convenience) in 1873 and carried all the way through to the early days if the Great Depression led to a global collapse of faith in capitalism as an economic system. Some countries moved to the left in this period, and some moved to the right. All but nobody remained where they had been. Today, it is only fringe groups that cling to the nonsense of unfettered capitalism. Otherwise, it is the case that we are all Keynesians now, all socialists, and all globalists.