Now i’m not a racist asshole who hates all niggers. If you act somewhat civilized, then I won’t think badly of you. However, we know most niggers fail to meet this very low bar. I’m torn on whether I should raise my son this way.

"Rich Republican"?

Need attention today?

Stop wasting everyone's time with this trolling.

They think this makes them look smart.

Keep it simple, start at the beginning.
Attachments:

,
Attachments:

There are thousands and thousands of dead white kids who would otherwise be alive if only their parents hand't allowed the Jewish media to cow them into silence about the true, empirical, demonstrable threat niggers and spics pose. Which would you rather have? Your kid think you're a racist (which is actually an opportunity to have a conversation with them about what that means and why it actually is a virtue rooted in rational thought), or get a knock on the door in the middle of the night from the cops telling you your daughter has been raped and murdered or your son shot in the head by a nigger?

If you love your children, you'll tell them the truth about niggers. Make sure you use the stats so they can't argue emotion; when they see just how much crime niggers commit - how niggers are 13% of the population but commit 50+% of all murders and similarly disproportional amounts of assaults, rapes, and property crime, how whites are nine times more likely to be assaulted by a nigger than a nigger by a white, how a cop is eight times more likely to be murdered by a nigger than a nigger shot by a cop, etc. - it will hopefully undo all the brainwashing they've suffered from the Jewish media.

You should similarly warn your children about jews, but at least jews won't directly murder them, only devise and enact policies designed to murder them.

There was a family from Africa in my neighborhood several years ago. The father was very well educated and worked in DC at one of the African embassies. Anyway to make a long story short, his teenage son started to behave and act in a manner that was too American so the father immediately sent the son on the next plane back to Africa.

Literally here one day and gone the next.

The father did not care for American blacks.

d9yem Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

There was a family from Africa in my
> neighborhood several years ago. The father was
> very well educated and worked in DC at one of the
> African embassies. Anyway to make a long story
> short, his teenage son started to behave and act
> in a manner that was too American so the father
> immediately sent the son on the next plane back to
> Africa.
>
> Literally here one day and gone the next.
>
> The father did not care for American blacks.

There is literally no African country that has a lower murder rate than the US. Not a single one. He may not have liked the way American niggers act, but as murderous as ours are, they are amateurs compared to African niggers. As an example, there are 20k murders in South Africa every year, while there are less than 18k in the US. The US has about 330 million people, while South Africa has only 55 million.

The white man is the single most dangerous murderer this world has ever known and coward.
Attachments:

African niggers are 10x worse Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> d9yem Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >

There was a family from Africa in my
> > neighborhood several years ago. The father was
> > very well educated and worked in DC at one of
> the
> > African embassies. Anyway to make a long story
> > short, his teenage son started to behave and
> act
> > in a manner that was too American so the father
> > immediately sent the son on the next plane back
> to
> > Africa.
> >
> > Literally here one day and gone the next.
> >
> > The father did not care for American
> blacks.

>
> There is literally no African country that has a
> lower murder rate than the US. Not a single one.
> He may not have liked the way American niggers
> act, but as murderous as ours are, they are
> amateurs compared to African niggers. As an
> example, there are 20k murders in South Africa
> every year, while there are less than 18k in the
> US. The US has about 330 million people, while
> South Africa has only 55 million.

There different social classes in Africa.

Not every African is out there committing murders.

People that are exposed to niggers learn about them and understand how they really are.

Libtard snowflakes that spend their days working as SJWs from their suburban gated communities have no clue.

Everyone learns soon enough. Have him watch the news and see the looting in Wilmington. Watch tennis and see how the monkey getting a 2M check behaves. 12% of our people represent 90% of our problems.

Sorry, you are a racist asshole. But by all means, teach your son well. Being a racist asshole will serve him as well as it has served you.

7yjpy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> African niggers are 10x worse Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > d9yem Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >

There was a family from Africa in my
> > > neighborhood several years ago. The father
> was
> > > very well educated and worked in DC at one of
> > the
> > > African embassies. Anyway to make a long
> story
> > > short, his teenage son started to behave and
> > act
> > > in a manner that was too American so the
> father
> > > immediately sent the son on the next plane
> back
> > to
> > > Africa.
> > >
> > > Literally here one day and gone the next.
> > >
> > > The father did not care for American
> > blacks.

> >
> > There is literally no African country that has
> a
> > lower murder rate than the US. Not a single
> one.
> > He may not have liked the way American niggers
> > act, but as murderous as ours are, they are
> > amateurs compared to African niggers. As an
> > example, there are 20k murders in South Africa
> > every year, while there are less than 18k in
> the
> > US. The US has about 330 million people, while
> > South Africa has only 55 million.
>
> There different social classes in Africa.
>
> Not every African is out there committing murders.


Learn what "regression to the mean" is (hint: it's a biological, psychometric phenomena that says outliers don't produce more outliers). There are no "good ones" - they all eventually regress to their mean, which is 85IQ (American nigger) or 70IQ (African) sociopaths.

Let him join the Army or work another job alongside blacks. Your poppycock and nonsense will soon enough be wrung out of him.

Blacks have their faults no doubt, but they're not bad people like spics and muslims.

Im sure the OP's mother, daughter and wife know the BBC truth

,
Attachments:

STFU Gerry

asdfasdasdfd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blacks have their faults no doubt, but they're not
> bad people like spics and muslims.


More people have been murdered by niggers than all the spics and muslims in the entire Western Hemisphere COMBINED. The only contemporary (post WWII) wide-spread genocides have occurred in Africa. There is no race more sociopathic and violent than the nigger race.

Whether you tell him or he learns on his own, everyone eventually learns about the niggers.

Wake up call Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let him join the Army or work another job
> alongside blacks. Your poppycock and nonsense will
> soon enough be wrung out of him.

Reality has a way of delivering a cold slap in the face to fanciful notions such as the foolish racist slop proffered by the OP.

In the real world... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wake up call Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Let him join the Army or work another job
> > alongside blacks. Your poppycock and nonsense
> will
> > soon enough be wrung out of him.
>
> Reality has a way of delivering a cold slap in the
> face to fanciful notions such as the foolish
> racist slop proffered by the OP.


Or in the case of the libtard restaurant owner from DC visiting Atlanta getting carjacked by one of those niggers you love - a warm fatal stab to the gut.

He learned.

Assuming that you know the difference, would you say that such a thing is typical or that is in an extreme outlier?

People who live in the real world quickly learn that all this hate speech about minorities is the weakest sort of paranoid nonsense. People are people. That's the lesson that sentient beings quickly learn when confronted by reality.

So what do you care if someone else doesn't like niggers?

If you want to hang out with them...hang out with them.

The unwavering commitment you express to ensuring everyone loves niggers is highly suspect, as if it isn't genuine or is some form of virtue signaling to compensate for some internally perceived slight to some nigger somewhere that you've never quite moved on from.

You can hate all the people your relatives hate. You just can't act in a prejudicial manner based on that hatred nor expect to receive any sort of hospitality at all in a public forum. So go fuck your sorry self, you disgusting racist pig.

If it's wearing normal clothes, is not covered with tattoos, and speaks actual English, it's a Black Person.

If you can see it's underwear or it's head is covered by an insane fake hair hat bought from an Asian woman, and it's speech is constant fucks and bitches, it's a Nigger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4

Yo ize krackas wants to learns about us niggas, cum on down to da hood tonight, weeze b showin ya all how’s to have fun n shit.

Its better you teach him about white Republicans who are anti gay because they will be the one fucking him in his ass.

I kept it real simple to my kids..stay away from them and dont bring any home.period.
Worked so far...

If they work, they’ll be needing a lot of sensitivity training.

In the real world... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Assuming that you know the difference, would you
> say that such a thing is typical or that is in an
> extreme outlier?
>
> People who live in the real world quickly learn
> that all this hate speech about minorities is the
> weakest sort of paranoid nonsense. People are
> people. That's the lesson that sentient beings
> quickly learn when confronted by reality.

100 years of psychometric and genetic data disagrees with you. There is an incredible amount of variation between the races, so people are most certainly not "people." Then there is the many millennia of anecdotal evidence, whereby subsaharan Africans failed to develop advanced mathematics, seafaring technology, complex written language, an advanced civilization, or even the wheel, while their white counterparts were building the Sistine Chapel and working out the laws of thermodynamics.

So what lesson are you going to learn from this confrontation with "reality?" Probably absolutely nothing, as your cognitive dissonance simply won't allow you to consider the possibility that your world view is totally incorrect.

Don't forget the part about dragging a people halfway round the world and enslaving them. That'll make a people uppity. Next time, y'allz better Xyclon-B the people's asses if you don't want no fucking uprising.

Thug.Niggah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget the part about dragging a people
> halfway round the world and enslaving them.
> That'll make a people uppity. Next time, y'allz
> better Xyclon-B the people's asses if you don't
> want no fucking uprising.

You and the kikes sold your own people to the white man, nigger. But you'll get no argument from me about Zyklon-B.

But that's neither here nor there - you were enslaved because you're biologically cognitively inferior. You were a stone-age culture with no ability to defend yourself from an technologically superior society. If this wasn't the case, you would have never been slaves - you would have repelled the slavers with ease, then returned to your highly-evolved society where you would have all been kangz. But instead, you were enslaved, and easily so. We made you slaves because we were basically extra-terrestrials compared to you shit-and-mud-hut-building, spear-chucking apes.

You were slaves because ur dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thug.Niggah Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Don't forget the part about dragging a people
> > halfway round the world and enslaving them.
> > That'll make a people uppity. Next time, y'allz
> > better Xyclon-B the people's asses if you don't
> > want no fucking uprising.
>
> You and the kikes sold your own people to the
> white man, nigger. But you'll get no argument
> from me about Zyklon-B.
>
> But that's neither here nor there - you were
> enslaved because you're biologically cognitively
> inferior. You were a stone-age culture with no
> ability to defend yourself from an technologically
> superior society. If this wasn't the case, you
> would have never been slaves - you would have
> repelled the slavers with ease, then returned to
> your highly-evolved society where you would have
> all been kangz. But instead, you were enslaved,
> and easily so. We made you slaves because we were
> basically extra-terrestrials compared to you
> shit-and-mud-hut-building, spear-chucking apes.

John Riggins was the last white running back elected to the Hall of Fame. Who do you want carrying the rock? A niggity, noggin', nappy headed niggah...biologically/cognitively inferior? Naw...naw, dawg naw...hellz to the naw.

Come try and enslave me! I'll cut off your head and bolt it to the hood of my Fleetwood...

No, people are not people Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 100 years of psychometric and genetic data disagrees with you.

No, they don't disagree at all. You need to pay a lot more attention to reality while canceling your subscriptions to white supremacist publications. The argument you try to make here was born from the ignorance of early colonial times. It makes no sense at all today.

> There is an incredible amount of variation between the races,
> so people are most certainly not "people."

There is no such evidence at all. Zero. What actual science actually tells us is that while there are modern-day races among chimpanzees and once were along other hominid lines, there are no races at all among human beings today. None. We all exist -- every single one of us -- along the same uninterrupted genetic continuum.

What I don't understand is why Africa is the most backward retarded place in the world.
One would expect it to be somewhat equivalent to white and Asian areas of the world.
But only if one believes the ridiculous theory represented above.
Obama was a success precisely because his mother kept him away from black "culture" , communities,schools etc.
Other than the 15 minutes that his father was around,he was intentionally departed from black people.
Sure ,he decided to be black temporarily to exploit the gullible tools in Chicago but he was soon done with them when they served no more use to him.
He hangs out with rich white people now and goes nowhere near Chicago.
Some might call this racist ,but all of the above is a statement of facts.

Above someone mentioned how the Blacks are basically being played by the Jews. In history, the Jews sold both white and black slaves and reason the Jews act like the black mans friend. The Jews are afraid the Blacks will one day seek revenge. Wherever the liberal Jew is you will find social chaos, it is intentional and profitable for them.

That's odd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What I don't understand is why Africa is the most
> backward retarded place in the world.
> One would expect it to be somewhat equivalent to
> white and Asian areas of the world.
> But only if one believes the ridiculous theory
> represented above.
> Obama was a success precisely because his mother
> kept him away from black "culture" ,
> communities,schools etc.
> Other than the 15 minutes that his father was
> around,he was intentionally departed from black
> people.
> Sure ,he decided to be black temporarily to
> exploit the gullible tools in Chicago but he was
> soon done with them when they served no more use
> to him.
> He hangs out with rich white people now and goes
> nowhere near Chicago.
> Some might call this racist ,but all of the above
> is a statement of facts.

Well let's see ...
No written language
No system of arithmetic
No architecture
No technology of any kind
So called music confined to bongo drums and nose flutes
The list goes on and on.
Is this the intellectual equivalence that liberals speak of?

Silly liberals Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well let's see ...
> No written language

The earliest known inscriptions of Semitic languages in Eritrea and Ethiopia date to the 9th century BC. Funny how all you pathetic assholes somehow managed to miss that.






> No system of arithmetic
> No architecture
> No technology of any kind
> So called music confined to bongo drums and nose
> flutes
> The list goes on and on.
> Is this the intellectual equivalence that liberals
> speak of?

anti-Semitism is not a bias against black people.
Semites are not black.
Semitic languages are not the languages of black people.
So very very stupid.

The people of Ethiopia and Eritrea are black. Just as all of your distant ancestors were. Deal with it.

Misguided fool... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, people are not people Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 100 years of psychometric and genetic data
> disagrees with you.
>
> No, they don't disagree at all. You need to pay a
> lot more attention to reality while canceling your
> subscriptions to white supremacist publications.
> The argument you try to make here was born from
> the ignorance of early colonial times. It makes
> no sense at all today.
>
> > There is an incredible amount of variation
> between the races,
> > so people are most certainly not "people."
>
> There is no such evidence at all. Zero. What
> actual science actually tells us is that while
> there are modern-day races among chimpanzees and
> once were along other hominid lines, there are no
> races at all among human beings today. None. We
> all exist -- every single one of us -- along the
> same uninterrupted genetic continuum.

I mean, literally everything you wrote was subjective opinion that stands in stark opposition to legitimate empirical data produced by some of the finest universities in the world. "Race" is not synonymous with "species," stupid. Again, a century's worth of psychometric and genetic data have proven conclusively that there are significant variations in cognitive ability between the races, just as there are significant variations in cognitive ability between breeds of dogs. You know nothing about science, just pseudo "social" science your community college marxist professor fed you.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Silly liberals Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Well let's see ...
> > No written language
>
> The earliest known inscriptions of Semitic
> languages in Eritrea and Ethiopia date to the 9th
> century BC. Funny how all you pathetic assholes
> somehow managed to miss that.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > No system of arithmetic
> > No architecture
> > No technology of any kind
> > So called music confined to bongo drums and
> nose
> > flutes
> > The list goes on and on.
> > Is this the intellectual equivalence that
> liberals
> > speak of?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Utter bullshit - link to something other than a Nation of Islam/We Wuz Kangz source.

The oldest known Semitic languages were spoken in the Middle East and NORTH Africa, not subsaharan Africa where all the niggers live: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Semitic-languages

You’re a pathetic ass. Google ‘race is a social construct’ for a list of pre-eminent sources who will make you look like the simpering sorry-ass stooge that you are.

That's odd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What I don't understand is why Africa is the most
> backward retarded place in the world.
> One would expect it to be somewhat equivalent to
> white and Asian areas of the world.
> But only if one believes the ridiculous theory
> represented above.
> Obama was a success precisely because his mother
> kept him away from black "culture" ,
> communities,schools etc.
> Other than the 15 minutes that his father was
> around,he was intentionally departed from black
> people.
> Sure ,he decided to be black temporarily to
> exploit the gullible tools in Chicago but he was
> soon done with them when they served no more use
> to him.
> He hangs out with rich white people now and goes
> nowhere near Chicago.
> Some might call this racist ,but all of the above
> is a statement of facts.

Obama's success had absolutely nothing to do with where or with whom he was raised, and everything to do with his BIOLOGY. He benefitted from having a white mother and her white genes. If he had been pure nog, he would have never achieved what he did, no matter how much affirmative action he benefitted from; he would have been just like his nigger father and nigger siblings, which is to say, indolent apes living in mud huts.

Way too stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You’re a pathetic ass. Google ‘race is a
> social construct’ for a list of pre-eminent
> sources who will make you look like the simpering
> sorry-ass stooge that you are.

Why would I do that? So I can read a bunch of subjective, social pseudoscience bullshit that is totally refuted by objective scientific data? You're a triggered nigger because you know, deep down, that what I say - and more importantly, what empirical science says - is true.

"Breed is a social construct! There's no difference between a German Shepherd and a Chihuahua!" LOL

Scientifically speaking, you are an example of "assholius ignorantis." Genetically speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings. Never has been. It's an example of long outdated myth and superstition. There is FAR more genetic differentiation in dogs that there is in humans. If people were dogs, we'd all be terriers.

Biology is destiny Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Obama's success had absolutely nothing to do with
> where or with whom he was raised, and everything
> to do with his BIOLOGY. He benefitted from having
> a white mother and her white genes. If he had
> been pure nog, he would have never achieved what
> he did, no matter how much affirmative action he
> benefitted from; he would have been just like his
> nigger father and nigger siblings, which is to
> say, indolent apes living in mud huts.

You're as dumb as a stick, and mud huts are an extremely effective and efficient form of construction.

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scientifically speaking, you are an example of
> "assholius ignorantis." Genetically speaking,
> there is no such thing as race in human beings.
> Never has been. It's an example of long outdated
> myth and superstition. There is FAR more genetic
> differentiation in dogs that there is in humans.
> If people were dogs, we'd all be terriers.

And yet there is an entire billion dollar industry devoted to identifying one's exact genetic ethnicity. How many world-class sprints are white? How many world class mathematicians are black? Why is the average African IQ 70 - a full two standard deviations below the norm and the clinical definition of retardation? Why didn't Africans independently develop the wheel? Why didn't they develop transoceanic seafaring technology? Why didn't they develop a complex written language, or a empire? Why were they living in shit huts and chucking spears centuries after Michelangelo painted the Sistine Chapel or Newton codified the laws of thermodynamics?

Sorry, but your bullshit pseudo social science simply cannot rationally refute empirical scientific data.

PS. Did you know that Africans are the only race to lack any Neanderthal DNA admixture?

PPS: https://www.livescience.com/8472-genetic-variations-separate-great-danes-dachshunds.html

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scientifically speaking, you are an example of
> "assholius ignorantis." Genetically speaking,
> there is no such thing as race in human beings.
> Never has been. It's an example of long outdated
> myth and superstition. There is FAR more genetic
> differentiation in dogs that there is in humans.
> If people were dogs, we'd all be terriers.


Bullshit.

You slow-poke goobers have sopped up the worst sorts of anti-science. Go read some actual science and stop being such flaming outright dolts.

That's odd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What I don't understand is why Africa is the most
> backward retarded place in the world.
> One would expect it to be somewhat equivalent to
> white and Asian areas of the world.
> But only if one believes the ridiculous theory
> represented above.
> Obama was a success precisely because his mother
> kept him away from black "culture" ,
> communities,schools etc.
> Other than the 15 minutes that his father was
> around,he was intentionally departed from black
> people.
> Sure ,he decided to be black temporarily to
> exploit the gullible tools in Chicago but he was
> soon done with them when they served no more use
> to him.
> He hangs out with rich white people now and goes
> nowhere near Chicago.
> Some might call this racist ,but all of the above
> is a statement of facts.

Lots of mumbo jumbo but no one can explain why the predominantly black continent of Africa is such a primitive shithole .
It's true that the human species emerged in Africa and it's obvious that a part of it evolved from the primitive ape-man and left Africa.
What remains are the non -evolved leftovers which haven't done much with the place.
Sorry,it must be disappointing to some but that's the reality.

No advancement Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's odd Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What I don't understand is why Africa is the
> most
> > backward retarded place in the world.
> > One would expect it to be somewhat equivalent
> to
> > white and Asian areas of the world.
> > But only if one believes the ridiculous theory
> > represented above.
> > Obama was a success precisely because his
> mother
> > kept him away from black "culture" ,
> > communities,schools etc.
> > Other than the 15 minutes that his father was
> > around,he was intentionally departed from black
> > people.
> > Sure ,he decided to be black temporarily to
> > exploit the gullible tools in Chicago but he
> was
> > soon done with them when they served no more
> use
> > to him.
> > He hangs out with rich white people now and
> goes
> > nowhere near Chicago.
> > Some might call this racist ,but all of the
> above
> > is a statement of facts.
>
> Lots of mumbo jumbo but no one can explain why the
> predominantly black continent of Africa is such a
> primitive shithole .
> It's true that the human species emerged in Africa
> and it's obvious that a part of it evolved from
> the primitive ape-man and left Africa.
> What remains are the non -evolved leftovers which
> haven't done much with the place.
> Sorry,it must be disappointing to some but that's
> the reality.

There's a sign in Obama's father's home village in Kenya.
It celebrates the home of ten generations of Obamas living there.
You should see what they've made of the place in all that time.
Any guesses?

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You slow-poke goobers have sopped up the worst
> sorts of anti-science. Go read some actual science
> and stop being such flaming outright dolts.

Name calling from a nigger who can't rebut a rational argument, much less define, "rebut."

Way too stupid... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You slow-poke goobers have sopped up the worst
> sorts of anti-science. Go read some actual science
> and stop being such flaming outright dolts.


Says the dumbfuck trying to pass off some feel-good pop science shit that immediately does the standard bullshit move of reframing the question to be one of species equating to race. lol Which wasn't the question to begin with. There obviously are races and the bases for race very clearly are genetic. In fact, race can be identified with about 99% certainty from genetic samples alone knowing nothing about the origin of those samples and the results from those unknown samples will aggregate in virtually the same way that we define race (with in fact further distinctions possible).

And your dog example fails too btw.

Quote

Stanford professor of genetics Carlos Bustamante and his colleagues analyzed more than 60,000 single genetic changes known as single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs for short, in 915 dogs. The dogs included representatives of 80 domestic breeds, 83 wild canids such as wolves, foxes and coyotes, and 10 Egyptian village dogs — domesticated but of no particular breed.

They found that — in contrast to humans — many physical traits in dogs are determined by very few genetic regions. For example, a dog with version A of the "snout length" region of a gene may have a long, slender muzzle, while version B confers a more standard nose and C an abnormally short schnoz. If X, Y and Z in the "leg length" region bestow a range of heights from short to tall, an A/X dog would have a slender muzzle and short legs like a dachshund. C/Y might be a bulldog, while B/Z would be more like a Labrador.

"We've found that only six or seven locations in the dog genome are necessary to explain about 80 percent of the differences in height and weight among dog breeds," said Bustamante, PhD. "In humans these are controlled by hundreds if not thousands of variants."

That's what happens when you don't know wtf you're talking about.

I'm sure that the doggie dna analysis has some meaning to you.
Niggers should be analyzed and perhaps we can breed the stupidity out of them like with Obama.

Mr. Green Genes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Way too stupid... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You slow-poke goobers have sopped up the worst
> > sorts of anti-science. Go read some actual
> science
> > and stop being such flaming outright dolts.
>
>
> Says the dumbfuck trying to pass off some
> feel-good pop science shit that immediately does
> the standard bullshit move of reframing the
> question to be one of species equating to race.
> lol Which wasn't the question to begin with.
> There obviously are races and the bases for race
> very clearly are genetic. In fact, race can be
> identified with about 99% certainty from genetic
> samples alone knowing nothing about the origin of
> those samples and the results from those unknown
> samples will aggregate in virtually the same way
> that we define race (with in fact further
> distinctions possible).
>
> And your dog example fails too btw.
>
>

Quote

Stanford professor of genetics Carlos
> Bustamante and his colleagues analyzed more than
> 60,000 single genetic changes known as single
> nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs for short, in
> 915 dogs. The dogs included representatives of 80
> domestic breeds, 83 wild canids such as wolves,
> foxes and coyotes, and 10 Egyptian village dogs
> — domesticated but of no particular breed.
>
> They found that — in contrast to humans — many
> physical traits in dogs are determined by very few
> genetic regions. For example, a dog with version A
> of the "snout length" region of a gene may have a
> long, slender muzzle, while version B confers a
> more standard nose and C an abnormally short
> schnoz. If X, Y and Z in the "leg length" region
> bestow a range of heights from short to tall, an
> A/X dog would have a slender muzzle and short legs
> like a dachshund. C/Y might be a bulldog, while
> B/Z would be more like a Labrador.
>
> "We've found that only six or seven locations in
> the dog genome are necessary to explain about 80
> percent of the differences in height and weight
> among dog breeds," said Bustamante, PhD. "In
> humans these are controlled by hundreds if not
> thousands of variants."
>

>
> That's what happens when you don't know wtf you're
> talking about.

Niggers are so hopelessly, biologically stupid that they are simply incapable of understanding genetics and psychometrics. So they substitute mythology for empirical reality, claiming race “is a social construct,” that “they wuz kangz,” that they built the pyramids, and Cleopatra was black (she was a Greek from Macedonia). Trying to have an informed, rational conversation with a nigger is like trying to converse with a dim child.

,
Attachments:

I dI'd this with my kids.

Every time I saw a nigger I rolled the windows up in the car and locked the doors. Every time I saw them on TV I'd say "gross" and change the channel. Interacal stuff I'd quickly change the channel and make a disgusted sound.

Teach them not to touch wild animals and niggers and to wash their hands often.

Mr. Green Genes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's what happens when you don't know wtf you're talking about.

As you should have recalled from the last time you foolishly tried to peddle this antiquated line of copy-and-paste crapola back in May, what happens when you don't know what you are talking about is that someone who does know comes along and shoves a load of settled science up your flea-bitten ass. Stuff like this...

Race Is a Social Construct, Scientists Argue - Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/

Race as a Social Construction | Psychology Today
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/without-prejudice/201612/race-social-construction

Race and Racial Identity Are Social Constructs - NYTimes.com
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/06/16/how-fluid-is-racial-identity/race-and-racial-identity-are-social-constructs

What We Mean When We Say 'Race Is a Social Construct' - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/what-we-mean-when-we-say-race-is-a-social-construct/275872/

The facts are that there is a general and broadly accepted scientific consensus that genetically speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings. Also that foolish thinking based on observations of adaptive traits and adherence to pre-scientific perceptions of the social construct of race form what continues to be a significant societal problem today. Basically, what we have here is a group of dimwitted late-adapters who still cling to long-outdated notions of race for no good reason at all. You would seem to be among those.

Oh, and by the way, rookie...

Why Am I Neanderthal? - National Geographic Genographic Project
https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/