If you thought Al Franken’s behavior was bad, this is much worse.

There is no statute of likitstions for sex crimes in Maryland.

This is bad, really bad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you thought Al Franken’s behavior was bad,
> this is much worse.

Fake news. There is no way anyone would want to molest that ugly hag.

Kavanaugh already has a lifetime appointment , no police reports , a liberal last minute BS show by a California wacko some 35 years later.

Feinstein should have raised this at the appropriate time before the hearings with the FBI, Its nothing but a leftist Democrat clown show attempt to hold off Kavanaugh's floor vote and try to get a senate majority in Nov.

America sees though this Democrat resistance today. They cant pull off what they were able to years ago. The media, Facebook, social networks work both ways to obstruct for Democrats and to bring the truth forward with the lies of the left

I wonder how much she's getting from the DNC to make up a good lie? What's the going rate these days?

That’s a lot of panic, considering that the GOP has no standards at all and will vote to confirm Kavanaugh no matter how many he raped or killed.

GOP's way of thinking,
Hurry up and confirm him, we'll worry about the victims later.

Shocker that she "just happened" to have helped organize anti-Trump marches...


Bay Area March for Science: Revenge of the Nerds

By LISA M. KRIEGER | lkrieger@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: April 21, 2017 at 7:00 am | UPDATED: April 22, 2017 at 9:15 am


Angered by the Trump administration’s proposed cuts to research, this is what the former surfer, sailor and tech specialist will say: “Science is the only thing that is going to cure ALS.”

Joining him will be science advocates — from Nobel laureates to Lego-loving toddlers — in Washington, D.C., and more than 600 cities across the world, including San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Cruz, Pacifica, Walnut Creek, Hayward, Livermore and Berkeley. In Los Angeles, the march will be led by an electric Hummer, driven by former NASA astronaut and SpaceX’s Garrett Reisman.

Call it the revenge of the nerds.

While the concept seems simple — who doesn’t love a springtime march? — the actual execution has been tougher.

The scientific community is a congregation of many different allegiances, with disagreements about how to solve the complex and intractable problems that face people and the planet. Some wonder whether activism belongs in science.

And protests in America have historically been driven by outraged radicals, people who reject standard norms. Scientists, in contrast, tend to prefer the quiet discipline of a lab, not the streets.

But faced with a threat, the sprawling community is pulling together as tightly as an ionic bond.

Over time, it’s grown into more than just a march — there are also “Teach-Ins,” science fairs and Earth Day festivals in places ranging from NASCAR-loving Martinsville, Virginia, to an expedition ship in frozen Antarctica.

“It’s a science party!” said biostatistician Christine Blasey, of Palo Alto, who will wear an elaborately knitted cap of the human brain — yarn turned into a supersized cerebral cortex — inspired by the “pussy hats” donned during the Women’s Marches.



Pleasanton knitter Eilene Cross made ‘brain caps’ for the upcoming March for Science, to be worn by friend Christine Blasey of Palo Alto

“Getting introverted people to the march — that’s huge,” she laughed.

And was one of those who signed a letter complaining about separations of illegals.


https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_other/Separation_Letter_FINAL.pdf


Page 5 - Christine Blasey Ph.D. Psychologist

Most voters were opposed to Trump in 2016 and their numbers have only grown since.

+4 million popular votes in CA don't count for anything and she lost about a million of those elsewhere.

Plain facts are that most most voters were opposed to Trump in 2016. It’s indisputable, no matter how stupid you are willing to make yourself look over it.

Trump will get another SCOTUS pick before the 2020 election.

3 picks in 4 years!

Fail fail fail Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Plain facts are that most most voters were opposed
> to Trump in 2016. It’s indisputable, no matter
> how stupid you are willing to make yourself look
> over it.


Plain fact is that Trump won the 2016 election. It’s indisputable, no matter how stupid you are willing to make yourself look over it.

I know Kavanaugh. He's a horny, gambling-addicted, douche bag of the highest order. His carefully cultivated boy scout/choir boy profile has been practiced for the past 18 years to elevate him to the highest court in the land.

Only until his quid pro quo with DJT (no, I will not vote to subpoena or prosecute POTUS) did he appear on the The Federalist Society short list.

This bozo is a fraud. There are many more victims from his days at GPrep and Yale.

A 35 yr old accusation at the last minute??

what a co-inky-dink!!!!!

Straight out of the libshit's playbook.

Fear of facts — a chronic condition of the degenerate right-wing.

Why was Kavanaugh in a room with a guy? Sounds more like she found them humping.

Leftist Psych professor at Palo Alto, That tells the whole story behind this obstruction

A true Nazi propaganda tactic, a last minute Hail Mary from the left that will backfire in the Democrats faces in November

Justice Thomas went thur the same BS and he became a total conservative, so will Kavanaugh, the left cant pull this crap and not expect payback

Leftists have cut their faces off to spite their nose

He will be forced to set aside so that the court is fair and balanced. Trump doesn't get everything just because he rigged the election.

"Over the summer of 2018, as it became apparent that Kavanaugh was going to be nominated for the Supreme Court, Ford debated whether she should come forward publicly with this information. According to the Post, Ford "engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases."

Since 2004, Katz has donated at least $26,000 to Democratic politicians including Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Kerry. She also donated to groups such as MoveOn.org, the DNC Services Corp, and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Debra Katz on Paula Jones....
....
"Jones claims she initially kept the incident to herself for fear of workplace retribution since Clinton knew her boss. Katz dismissed Jones' assertions on March 30th,1998 on CNN's "Talkback Live" saying that, "Paula Jones' suit is very, very, very weak. She's alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace."
....
"Likewise, Katz again said on CBS' Evening News on April 2nd, 1998 that Jones' allegation could not hold up in court because, "Clearly a one-time incident that took place in 10 to 12 minutes, she was not forced to have sex, she left on her own volition, the courts increasingly are finding that that is not enough to create a sexually hostile work environment claim."

Debra Katz on Al Franken.....

Fast forward to 2017 and Katz defended then Sen. Al Franken after a photo appeared of him mock groping a female colleague while working as a comedian. At the time Katz said, "Context is relevant. He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer," and dismissed concern it was sexual harassment."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2018/09/16/kavanaugh-accusers-lawyer-part-of-resistance-big-democrat-donor-and-has-trashed-paula-jones-n2519525

He may get in the court, but we will go after him and a few others justices with a impeach

Paula Jones had her case thrown out of court after the judge ruled that even if everything she claimed were true, she would not have a valid complaint.

http://twitter.com/alexhamilton74/status/1041417856896905217/photo/1



Did you know #ChristineBlaseyFord attended the Anti-Trump March For Science wearing a special Science Pussy Hat? And that she donates to ActBlue, the PAC that "enables Democrats, progressive groups, & nonprofits to raise money on the Internet"?



https://twitter.com/alexhamilton74/status/1041406720633958400/photo/1



Hey look. Another #ChristineBlaseyFord web page scrubbed from the internet. Kinda weird to erase yourself from the internet before making a huge public claim. Almost seems like she doesn't want people to know her past? @Cernovich

What a laugh

Newsflash for Assholes: You’re not allowed to sexually assault teenagers at any time for any reason. Lying about it later is just s further disgrace. There is no way this clown should be on any court at all.

BKB9P Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder how much she's getting from the DNC to
> make up a good lie? What's the going rate these
> days?

Christine Ford got:

Free UBER rides

Lifetime supply of Rijunite

Free Kevlar dalkon shield

She’s got the “fergie” look...not the sexy ex meth addict singer, the duchess of York!

No lips to wrap around your dick.

Got “well teeth” all gums and yellowed from no fluoride in their water.

Receding hairline like a tax attorney from E&Y.

This stories a lie!
Kavanaugh woulda used a brown bag rather than his hand!

Morality..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Newsflash for Assholes: You’re not allowed to
> sexually assault teenagers at any time for any
> reason. Lying about it later is just s further
> disgrace. There is no way this clown should be on
> any court at all.


Lying about being assaulted is just as reprehensible as assaulting someone. It makes it harder for victims to come forward and be believed.

Are voters of Democrat politicians, 50 % of them are liberals the other 50% are leftists

Don't even try to ride the high house of morality, that's a battle you'll be laughed out of your three ring clown show on

Liberals and leftist abortionists talking about morality, as they let criminals go free, support illegals sneaking into the USA as well as welfare fraud, medical fraud, voter fraud the fraud goes on and this Leftist Democrat Anti Trump female activist is a fraud as well

Morality..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Newsflash for Assholes: You’re not allowed to
> sexually assault teenagers at any time for any
> reason. Lying about it later is just s further
> disgrace. There is no way this clown should be on
> any court at all.


Guess I'm not getting on the court as well because of what we did 35 years ago at Tech and Radford parties.

God those drunk chicks could suck some dick!

This shows how low the democratic party will go. What a bunch of nonsense. I feel even sorry for the third world scum who call themselves democrats as they must be embarrassed.

She's a liar who waited forty years to make up a lie that she could have told at any point in his career, never mind at the time of the imaginary incident. He has undergone three separate, exhaustive FBI reviews throughout his career as he climbed the judicial ladder, and this issue was never, ever brought to light. She can't remember who drove her to the house this supposedly happened in, what exactly happened, who took her home, and the other man she said was present has said she is a liar.

And yes, there are statute of limitations on sexual assault, not that it matters because she's a liar and a sufferer of Trump Derangement Syndrome who is making this up because she's an unbalanced cat lady.

96% Of Sex Perverts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are voters of Democrat politicians, 50 % of them
> are liberals the other 50% are leftists
>
> Don't even try to ride the high house of morality,
> that's a battle you'll be laughed out of your
> three ring clown show on
>
> Liberals and leftist abortionists talking about
> morality, as they let criminals go free, support
> illegals sneaking into the USA as well as welfare
> fraud, medical fraud, voter fraud the fraud goes
> on and this Leftist Democrat Anti Trump female
> activist is a fraud as well

This - the party of sex predator Bill Clinton, sex predator enabler Hillary Clinton (not just her husband, but her successful defense as a trial lawyer of a child rapist), sex predator Weinstein and countless other Hollywood progressive deviants, murderers of unborn children (half of which are little girls), etc., etc., etc.

The Democrat Party is the party of degeneracy, nihilism, and victimization.

Don't forget about me - Al Franken
Attachments:

while the Dems scream about Kavanaugh using a 35 year old uncorroborated tale with a sketchy back story, they remain totally silent their deputy DNC chair and high ranking congressman Keith Ellison who was accused of domestic assault with 911 calls to validate the story.

It's just another Dem double standard. Throw out an uncorroborated accusation to smear someone they don't like, while ignoring the pungent smell of domenstic assault in their leadership.

Good luck with all that.
Attachments:

Morality..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Newsflash for Assholes: You’re not allowed to
> sexually assault teenagers at any time for any
> reason. Lying about it later is just s further
> disgrace. There is no way this clown should be on
> any court at all.

Now back to your regularly scheduled partisan banalities...

Woman does not know who she was with, who took her there

She sure knows how to set up a anti Trump march


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Im The Dixie Wigger one half white man the other half N !

Coming attractions? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is no statute of likitstions for sex crimes
> in Maryland.


What's a "likitstion"?

BKB9P Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder how much she's getting from the DNC to
> make up a good lie? What's the going rate these
> days?


Whatever Soros is willing to pay.

Asker of Questions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Coming attractions? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There is no statute of likitstions for sex
> crimes
> > in Maryland.
>
>
> What's a "likitstion"?

What sex crime? He was a minor if the act actually happened.

We all knew girls like her back in high school.

Asker of Questions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Coming attractions? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There is no statute of likitstions for sex
> crimes
> > in Maryland.
>
>
> What's a "likitstion"?

Likely what a cell phone did to ‘limitations’. Pretty easy to figure that one out.

Morality..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Newsflash for Assholes: You’re not allowed to
> sexually assault teenagers at any time for any
> reason. Lying about it later is just s further
> disgrace. There is no way this clown should be on
> any court at all.


Hay baby, you can sexually assault and disgrace me anytime you want.

I'll bet you're tight.

Based on him being heterosexual and liking white women he's got my vote.

^^^ The IQ of the two posters above combined is less than 100.

This woman, and the Democrats by extension, will be hoist with their own petard after the facts come to light.

Sooo…… this woman is turning out to be very interesting. Here are some tidbits about her that are floating around on the internet. I think a lot of people would be anxiously awaiting the opportunity to question her in an open hearing.

- She admitted to a friend that she was an alcoholic in college.

- She apparently believed that she was a joint because of how much she was passed around in high school and college...Said that she had 64 sexual partners between 11th grade and graduation from college. Apparently took pride in the fact because of the precise number she used and kept count like an old gun slinger would put notches on the handle of his pistol.

- How did she get into a bedroom with Brett Kavanaugh IF it indeed did happen. Was she looking for another "trophy"?

-Brett Kavanaugh's mother was a district judge in a 1996 foreclosure case in which Blasey-Ford's parents were defendents.

- Recently said that "Scalia" types should be banned from law.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2018 01:34PM by Inquisitive One.

^^^ You way fucked up the petard thing.

Stating the obvious... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ The IQ of the two posters above combined is
> less than 100.


Mine is in the 120 plus range nimrod. How are your bowels?

There are no excuses for the sexual assault of a teenager. Then lying about the matter is hardly excusable behavior either.

Dope... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ You way fucked up the petard thing.


Spoken like a true dummy.

Note to asholes..: Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There are no excuses for the sexual assault of a
> teenager. Then lying about the matter is hardly
> excusable behavior either.


True. Professor Ford should withdraw here libelous statements and apologize.

This is all pretty obvious.

1) Repubs know that Judge K probably did assault this woman, and correctly assume that the more time passes, the more obvious it will become.

2) Repubs also know that after the mid terms they will have a hard time getting a janitor confirmed, much less a SCOTUS justice.

Time is of the essence

Does she get to write a book about it now?
35 years and wanting more retirement money.

jkdxh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is all pretty obvious.
>
> 1) Repubs know that Judge K probably did assault
> this woman, and correctly assume that the more
> time passes, the more obvious it will become.
>
> 2) Repubs also know that after the mid terms they
> will have a hard time getting a janitor confirmed,
> much less a SCOTUS justice.
>
> Time is of the essence

Probably did assault her?

LOL!

This alleged assault took place in the early 80s. This ardent liberal waited over three decades to make this salacious accusation?

She didn't think it was pertinent when Brett Kavanaugh was a top lieutenant to the liberal's biggest boogey man on the 1990s, Ken Star? After all, Kavanaugh was he primary author of the Starr report to Congress outlining the Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal? You don't think an allegation that the top author of that report was himself guilty of sexual assault would have been damaging to Starr?

Then, in the 2000s, Brett Kavanaugh served as a top aid to the liberal's biggest boogey man of the decade, George W. Bush. She didn't think it might be relevant or damaging to the GOP to make her baseless accusations then?

After his stint as a top aid to President Bush, he was nominated and confirmed to the DC Court of Appeals, the most important appeals court in the nation. Again, she didn't think it important enough to make those allegations then?

You do realize that the above positions all require an extensive FBI background check, don't you? Are you saying that the FBI dropped the ball on multiple occasions?

Did this woman have some sort of time machine or ability to see the future that she waited three decades to make this claim? Why did she wait all that time to make an allegation against a nominee of a President who she has stridently opposed on numerous occasions?

What's obvious is you're an idiot.

Well, since the Judge's innocence is plain as the nose on your face, a few extra weeks investigating isn't going to hurt. Then you can throw being right in us libtards face. Mark Judge's testimony, under oath, would be helpful, as would the accuser's and the nominee's.

Should clear it all up. Not nervous, are you?

Not nervous at all, but also not naïve enough to let a legitimate process be hijacked by a bunch of obvious liars and obstructionists. Just wait, this woman and this ploy will backfire by week's end.

OK, my friend, you seem a bit more intelligent than the normal mouth breathers that inhabit this cesspool. So I will ask reasonable questions

Assuming, hypothetically, that it did happen, and the Judge has lied about it, does it have any effect on his qualifications for SCOTUS?

And if it does have an effect, are you 100% certain the woman is lying? If so, how?

Like nominees before the Committee, I don't deal with hypotheticals.

I guess I gave you too much credit.

Perhaps. Not to worry though, I never gave you any.

here's what's obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like nominees before the Committee, I don't deal
> with hypotheticals.


They had ample opportunity to raise this long ago. They purposefully held it back until the last minute as a last ditch effort because they know that they have no way to stop it. Sorry, disqualified on that basis alone.

I had hoped to have my very reasonable questions answered. I should have known better. Trumpers either have a lack of mental capacity, or no balls, or both

LOL! You don't get anything answered until you answer the questions posed to you. Such a small minded self entitled child. You want answers? Answer the questions posed to you.

Looking back, you did pose questions that I did not answer. I apologize. Generally speaking, the questions you ask do raise legitimate issues regarding the woman's credibility and the competence of the FBI. They should be considered with all other relevant information, particularly questions answered under oath by those in a position to "witness" the alleged assault. I believe that a "decision" can, and should, be reached only after a careful and sober review of all information, pro or con.

Now, I would appreciate your answering my questions, unless you 1) dont have the mental capacity, or 2) don't have the balls. In which case I will certainly understand

Claiming I raised legitimate issues by asking those questions is not the same as actually answering the questions.

So, here's the answer you get. Hypothetically speaking, your questions raise legitimate issues. But, because they are hypotheticals, they carry very little weight.

Dude, the answer is that the credibility of the accuser and the FBI are impacted by the issues you raised, and should be considered in light of all obtainable information, including the testimony of those allegedly present during the assault. At least to an extent, I am agreeing with you.

However, you are still ducking my questions. I am wondering whether I overrated your intellectual capacity, but, the more I think about it, your balls (or lack thereof) may be the real issue.

You, of course, have the God-given right to decline to answer. Got balls?

Balls? You may want to check your tighty whities, champ.

You still didn’t answer the questions. Indicating credibility was impacted doesn’t answer the questions. It’s just another way to obfuscate.

Are you saying the FBI missed this alleged crime multiple times? It’s really just a yes or no answer.

Still challenged by reading comprehension, eh? I will try this again.

The FBI may well have missed this as part of their previous background check. Really depends on whether Ford is telling the truth or not. Which seems to me to be important. If she is, and Kavanaugh goes on SCOTUS anyway, lying about one's involvement in a crime (admittedly a 40 year old crime) will not disqualify one from serving on our nations highest court.

Which brings me back to my original question. Does it matter? The issue with Clarence Thomas was whether he did it. Everyone, on both sides, assumed it mattered. This one, at least to my friends on the right, seems to be different.

So, with all due respect, does it fucking matter?

She's a lying whore. Fuck her.

May well is not a yes or no.

Got it. No balls.

Anybody else in here got the stones? Does it matter?

Big balls. Big motherfuckin' boulders. Too bad you can't say the same.

Why not give a yes or no? Is your boyfriend borrowing your nutsack for the day?

Here it is again: Did the FBI drop the ball and miss this alleged crime multiple times? How about you stop equivocating and answer the question.

Don't know. But I hope Senate Repubs care enough about our country to allow us to find out sufficiently in time, so we can fire the incompetent FBI people, not to mention avoiding having to say "You know, that guy really should not have been put on the Court."

Best answer I can give you, my friend. I would truly like to find out, for reasons I doubt you would agree with. Lying to the American people, in my humble opinion, should disqualify you from being on SCOTUS. (And I am no fan of Obama or the Clintons, so don't give me that shit). But before we go to the expense and trouble of finding out, we need to decide whether it matters if he lied or not.

So, once more, does it fucking matter?

Don't know?

You started off this entire discussion with the premise that it was "obvious" that Kavanaugh "probably" committed the assault.

Now, you don't know?

Doesn't sound very obvious or probable to me if you don't know, because if your contention is correct, the FBI dropped the ball.

In the old days there was a code - now politicaljackasses are ruining it for all men. Grab some pussy once in your life or take a joke pic like Frankin and you are fucked. Might as well join the priesthood - oh wait that wont work anymore either.

Well, I am entitled to my opinions. And I can be an asshole at times, its' part of my charm. I will also bait people occasionally to keep them interested.

But you seemed a little more intelligent that some of the posters here (just look at the thread titles on the index page. So I (apparently unsucessfully) tried to change the "conversation". Trumpers, for whatever reason, seem to get very defensive when I ask questions that are intended to enlighten me about how Trumpers think. And that is too bad, because I try to be open minded, and if a Trumper (or anyone else) presents a valid argument, I am capable of being convinced I am wrong. But what I usually get is "but, but...Vince Foster". And that is also enlightening, in a way, but not in a real positive sense.

So, for the record, what I believe (that the story is consistent, although the story tellers credibility is damaged) is ultimately irrelevant if the whole thing does not matter in the first place. I admit it, I was doing a bit of trolling when we first met, and, again, I am an admitted asshole, but I (apparently mistakenly) thought there might be hope for an exchange of ideas.

So flame away, my friend. I'll be around.

Americans: Innocent until proven guilty.
Democrats/commies: Guilty until proven innocent.

This is all they could come up with???? I smell desperation

>But I hope Senate Repubs care enough

Cut the bullshit ,the only thing you care about is obstructing and holding the American people back with a 4-4 high court or anything else your Democrats can get away with.

Everyone knew the Democrats would pull some kind of dirty shit with any Trump SCOTUS pics.

First we will see if this woman will be sworn in and commit possible perjury to the senate judiciary committees questions, If she's a no show that's the end of it right there. Kavanaugh will be sworn and answer questions soon before the committee.

The GOP will let this woman's voice be heard despite all that's known about her and her possible motives for this 11th hour accusation without facts, but its not going to be your open ended Democrat clown show resistance circus for as long as you want Sen Schumer.

jkdxh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, I am entitled to my opinions. And I can be
> an asshole at times, its' part of my charm. I will
> also bait people occasionally to keep them
> interested.
>
> But you seemed a little more intelligent that some
> of the posters here (just look at the thread
> titles on the index page. So I (apparently
> unsucessfully) tried to change the "conversation".
> Trumpers, for whatever reason, seem to get very
> defensive when I ask questions that are intended
> to enlighten me about how Trumpers think. And
> that is too bad, because I try to be open minded,
> and if a Trumper (or anyone else) presents a valid
> argument, I am capable of being convinced I am
> wrong. But what I usually get is "but,
> but...Vince Foster". And that is also
> enlightening, in a way, but not in a real positive
> sense.
>
> So, for the record, what I believe (that the story
> is consistent, although the story tellers
> credibility is damaged) is ultimately irrelevant
> if the whole thing does not matter in the first
> place. I admit it, I was doing a bit of trolling
> when we first met, and, again, I am an admitted
> asshole, but I (apparently mistakenly) thought
> there might be hope for an exchange of ideas.
>
> So flame away, my friend. I'll be around.


I'm not a Trumper, so if your objective was to see how one thinks, you set along the wrong path.

As for the story's consistency, there is no consistency about it whatsoever. Professor Ford concedes she told no one about it—not even a high school girl friend or family member—until 2012 when she told the story as part of couples therapy with her husband. WAPO reports that the therapist’s notes from 2012 say there were four male assailants. Now, she claims there were only two. That's just one inconsistency.

Further, consistent stories don't have massive holes you could drive a fleet of tanks through. First, she can't recall when the alleged assault took place. For such a traumatic experience, that simple detail would be indelible on a victim's mind. She can't even recall what month the alleged assault took place. Why is that important? Because if she could iron down a date or even a month, Judge Kavanaugh might be able to come up with an alibi that he was out of the state or even country at the time of the alleged assault. And, with that, the whole story would fall apart, and that just can't happen during a political broadside.

Professor Ford also can’t recall in whose home the alleged assault took place, how she got there, or how she got home that evening. All pertinent facts that would make the story more consistent and more believable. It would also make it easier to corroborate. Again, that corroboration may favor Judge Kavanaugh's recollection of events and that simply won't work for a political hit job.

This is not he said-she said. This is a case of an alleged teenage encounter, partially recalled 30 years later without corroboration, and brought forward to ruin Judge Kavanaugh’s reputation for partisan purposes.

Finally, you are entitled to your opinion, but either the FBI did their job in thoroughly investigating the background of Judge Kavanaugh (on numerous occasions) or they didn't. For some reason, you can't say. Hmmmm. That rings of cowardice my ball-less friend.

Thnaks to support from knee-jerk hard-right ideologues, Kavanaugh is getting much more consideration than he actually deserves. Merrick Garland got much less.

Waaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh, Merrick Garland.

If Repooplicans can just sit on Merrick Garland, what's all the rush with your sexual predator guy?

Repooplicans! What a knee slapper. I bet you thought that was funny. Did your 4th grade pals laugh along with you?

What's with the last minute accusations by a Trump hating California professor ?

Kept hidden for months by another Trump hating California Democrat who had every opportunity to ask Judge Kavanaugh any questions she wanted

The commies and Nazis never had a problem finding compulsive liars to spread propaganda , so how about the leftist Democrats ?? Do they ??

Its all about collusion between the left to throw the election in November their way with the same predictable dirty trick accusations that have been their trademark tactic before, America show them the back door out of Congress in November

Democrats have harmed American women who have been victims of sexual assaults and now will hide it because they don't want to be pilloried and called a liar as this woman will called by millions upon millions because of this last minute dirty tricks attack against the American people put up by Democrats

Maybe I should have spelled it Re-POOP-licans just to make it clear how full of shit you mindless kissers of dotard ass really are.

>what's all the rush

This woman could make her accusations at any time, and even if Kavanaugh was a Justice if her claims are credible the case would be fully investigated with plenty of time to do it. If facts were found true , then the matter would be placed by the American people by Democrats and the media and he could be removed from the high bench by the impeachment process

SO What libtards problem, other then times running out on your obstruction and resistance lying time before November

Notice how far these immoral dipshits are willing to go in order to avoid confrontation with the facts or any of their obvious consequences.

The Dixie Wigger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > what's all the rush

> This woman could make her accusations at any time,
> and even if Kavanaugh was a Justice if her claims
> are credible the case would be fully investigated
> with plenty of time to do it.

What's wrong with now? Why are you trying to hide behind so many different bushes?

GOP has no principles at all Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Notice how far these immoral dipshits are willing
> to go in order to avoid confrontation with the
> facts or any of their obvious consequences.


What facts?

You should really be ashamed in the way Sen. Feinstein an others handled this manufactured controversy.

Your feigned outrage is admirable though.

Don't even think about getting on that High Horse, liberals don't own one , even if they got on one it would throw them off . Horses know full well what a horses ass is

They also don't like dirty tricksters

Typical liberals...

Getting political donations from the actual men who are taping women.

Last minute they find some cunt to make shit up.

Because of this, President Trump will get to make another pick when Ginsburg meets mr mayhem!
Trump and his 3 SCOTUS confirmations!

Libs...pulling at strings

If this really matters then why did Feinstein hold on to it until this late date? This clearly a politically motivated ploy.

This accusation is crap, the American people know it, and the Dems are going to be crushed in the Mid-Terms.

Obviously. Red Wave. Count on it.