Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Corruption everywhere
()
Date: August 17, 2018 02:27PM
Wonder who could be behind such threats?
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: August 17, 2018 02:33PM
Obama told us that he was going to fundamentally change this country and he did not say it would be for the better. He has changed the US into a third world country along with all of the corruption and lawlessness that could be expected of such a shithole. Venezuela here we come!
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Lol...
()
Date: August 17, 2018 02:42PM
^^^ Stupidest shit on FFXU!
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Cellar Dwellers on Drugs
()
Date: August 17, 2018 02:51PM
Lol... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ Stupidest shit on FFXU!
Oh, it can and will get worse.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ Stupidest shit on FFXU!
Oh, it can and will get worse.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Hmmm...
()
Date: August 17, 2018 02:58PM
Not unless True_the_Vote comes back.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
jfjdhsgdbdiwk
()
Date: August 17, 2018 03:55PM
lettuce
tomato
milk
bread
mayo
filet
tuna
taters
rice
tomato
milk
bread
mayo
filet
tuna
taters
rice
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
TDSS
()
Date: August 17, 2018 06:13PM
Liberals are very nice folks. As long as they get their way. If not, they become angry, bitter, violent, and deranged.
Witness the last two years.
Witness the last two years.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Take out the trash
()
Date: August 17, 2018 07:13PM
He lost by almost 3 million votes. He’s done nothing but trash the place since. Easily the worst Prez ever.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Mandafort isn't president
()
Date: August 17, 2018 07:24PM
Just checking.
The last guy was confused on this.
The last guy was confused on this.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Seeya Monday...
()
Date: August 17, 2018 07:27PM
Reading is fundamental.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Mature adult
()
Date: August 17, 2018 08:55PM
Take out the trash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He lost by almost 3 million votes. He’s done
> nothing but trash the place since. Easily the
> worst Prez ever.
No he didn't. The electoral college only has 538 votes. This isn't a new system, why can't you liberals understand how it works?
-------------------------------------------------------
> He lost by almost 3 million votes. He’s done
> nothing but trash the place since. Easily the
> worst Prez ever.
No he didn't. The electoral college only has 538 votes. This isn't a new system, why can't you liberals understand how it works?
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
$100 he acquitted
()
Date: August 17, 2018 09:36PM
$100 Days he’s acquitted.
This mofo spent millions on clothing!
Manafort himself is an attorney.
Imagine HIS attorney...
This probe is a total distraction and bullshit.
This mofo spent millions on clothing!
Manafort himself is an attorney.
Imagine HIS attorney...
This probe is a total distraction and bullshit.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Your manafort wager
()
Date: August 17, 2018 09:38PM
I will take that bet!
He’s going to get fucked up the azz in Prizon!
He’s going to get fucked up the azz in Prizon!
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Take out the trash
()
Date: August 19, 2018 10:28AM
Mature adult Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No he didn't.
Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
Which number is larger?
> The electoral college only has 538 votes. This isn't a new system,
> why can't you liberals understand how it works?
The point is over how BADLY it works. Twice in sixteen years now, we have had a "failed election", one where the popular vote winner was declared the loser. Where else do we see this happen?
Maybe it's time to realize that the Electoral College was a product of a time that is long gone. Here's how to fix it...
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
> No he didn't.
Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
Which number is larger?
> The electoral college only has 538 votes. This isn't a new system,
> why can't you liberals understand how it works?
The point is over how BADLY it works. Twice in sixteen years now, we have had a "failed election", one where the popular vote winner was declared the loser. Where else do we see this happen?
Maybe it's time to realize that the Electoral College was a product of a time that is long gone. Here's how to fix it...
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Tyranny of the Majority
()
Date: August 19, 2018 12:25PM
Take out the trash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mature adult Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No he didn't.
>
> Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
> Which number is larger?
>
> > The electoral college only has 538 votes. This
> isn't a new system,
> > why can't you liberals understand how it works?
>
> The point is over how BADLY it works. Twice in
> sixteen years now, we have had a "failed
> election", one where the popular vote winner was
> declared the loser. Where else do we see this
> happen?
>
> Maybe it's time to realize that the Electoral
> College was a product of a time that is long gone.
> Here's how to fix it...
>
> https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
That’s not failed.
That’s exactly how it’s intended to work.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mature adult Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No he didn't.
>
> Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
> Which number is larger?
>
> > The electoral college only has 538 votes. This
> isn't a new system,
> > why can't you liberals understand how it works?
>
> The point is over how BADLY it works. Twice in
> sixteen years now, we have had a "failed
> election", one where the popular vote winner was
> declared the loser. Where else do we see this
> happen?
>
> Maybe it's time to realize that the Electoral
> College was a product of a time that is long gone.
> Here's how to fix it...
>
> https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
That’s not failed.
That’s exactly how it’s intended to work.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Sore damn losers
()
Date: August 19, 2018 01:11PM
The 2003 World Series was won by the Marlins, even though they were outscored 21-17 by the Yankees.
Why didn’t the Yankees complain about how unfair that is?
Because they knew that the championship was decided on games won, not runs.
Hillary and the Democrats knew how the electoral system worked before the election, and were quite fine with it until they lost.
Why didn’t the Yankees complain about how unfair that is?
Because they knew that the championship was decided on games won, not runs.
Hillary and the Democrats knew how the electoral system worked before the election, and were quite fine with it until they lost.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Take out the trash
()
Date: August 19, 2018 01:39PM
The electoral college was part of compromises necessary 230 years ago to preserve the union by getting amendments to the failed Articles of Confederation ratified so as to produce what we now call the US Constitution.
If this were such a satisfactory way of conducting elections, it would be used in elections at all levels everywhere. It is not actually used anywhere else, and every election where the popular winner was denied victory has been called a “failed election.”
If this were such a satisfactory way of conducting elections, it would be used in elections at all levels everywhere. It is not actually used anywhere else, and every election where the popular winner was denied victory has been called a “failed election.”
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Low IQ libs again
()
Date: August 19, 2018 02:37PM
Take out the trash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mature adult Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No he didn't.
>
> Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
> Which number is larger?
Wow, you're retarded. Those numbers don't determine the outcome of the election. As someone else already pointed out, the system worked as intended.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mature adult Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No he didn't.
>
> Trump: 62,984,828 -- Clinton: 65,853,514
> Which number is larger?
Wow, you're retarded. Those numbers don't determine the outcome of the election. As someone else already pointed out, the system worked as intended.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Wrong againnn
()
Date: August 19, 2018 03:12PM
Whiny, hand-wringing liberals have no problem with the electoral system unless it doesn’t go their way.
To the dumbass who says it’s outdated, it’s not. It ensures that states with smaller populations have a strong voice. Places that were ignored by Hillary and would be ignored by future candidates if the system were abolished.
To the dumbass who says it’s outdated, it’s not. It ensures that states with smaller populations have a strong voice. Places that were ignored by Hillary and would be ignored by future candidates if the system were abolished.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Duke
()
Date: August 19, 2018 04:20PM
Face it liberals
You lost
Attachments:
You lost
Attachments:
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
Take out the trash
()
Date: August 19, 2018 04:34PM
One man, one vote. Except a vote for President in Wyoming counts much more than a vote in California. It’s just like in a banana republic.
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
XLY6B
()
Date: August 19, 2018 05:40PM
Take out the trash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The electoral college was part of compromises
> necessary 230 years ago to preserve the union by
> getting amendments to the failed Articles of
> Confederation ratified so as to produce what we
> now call the US Constitution.
>
> If this were such a satisfactory way of conducting
> elections, it would be used in elections at all
> levels everywhere. It is not actually used
> anywhere else, and every election where the
> popular winner was denied victory has been called
> a “failed election.”
You must be a liberal since you made this up. The electoral college was established for two reasons:
1) To keep a tyrant from compromising a direct vote (kinda what hilldabeast did) and
2) To give the smaller states a say in the Presidential election equal to their representation in congress
It had NOTHING to do with the failed articles of confederation amendments - what are you talking about. #2 was one of many compromises made to get the constitution approved by the states. Read federalist 68 for more detail.
A better change would be to get rid of the winner take all approach used by the states - that way my vote would not be wasted in VA.
Regardless, if you don't like it get off your ass, initiate a constitutional convention and get an amendment for a direct vote - good luck!
-------------------------------------------------------
> The electoral college was part of compromises
> necessary 230 years ago to preserve the union by
> getting amendments to the failed Articles of
> Confederation ratified so as to produce what we
> now call the US Constitution.
>
> If this were such a satisfactory way of conducting
> elections, it would be used in elections at all
> levels everywhere. It is not actually used
> anywhere else, and every election where the
> popular winner was denied victory has been called
> a “failed election.”
You must be a liberal since you made this up. The electoral college was established for two reasons:
1) To keep a tyrant from compromising a direct vote (kinda what hilldabeast did) and
2) To give the smaller states a say in the Presidential election equal to their representation in congress
It had NOTHING to do with the failed articles of confederation amendments - what are you talking about. #2 was one of many compromises made to get the constitution approved by the states. Read federalist 68 for more detail.
A better change would be to get rid of the winner take all approach used by the states - that way my vote would not be wasted in VA.
Regardless, if you don't like it get off your ass, initiate a constitutional convention and get an amendment for a direct vote - good luck!
Re: Manafort judge reveals threats against himself and jury
Posted by:
wally
()
Date: August 19, 2018 11:40PM
Your manafort wager Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will take that bet!
>
> He’s going to get fucked up the azz in Prizon!
If he's convicted Trump will just pardon him.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will take that bet!
>
> He’s going to get fucked up the azz in Prizon!
If he's convicted Trump will just pardon him.