HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That list would not include you in any material
> way. That’s what’s quite obvious to one with
> decades of high level interagency experience at
> the federal level.


You're full of shit.

And we all know it.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Millions of people are employed by the federal
> government. They will have a job series, but most
> — like you — have never had an actual title at
> all. That’s why I’m not hearing anything
> about the highest rank anyone ever actually
> attained.


You're not 'hearing' anything about the highest "rank" because, in the federal government, it's called "grades", not rank you imbecilic douchebag. Only the military has rank. No one who was/is in federal service, including veterans, calls it "rank". What a fucktard you have here.

What an insightful reply. Typical of assholes more than fed executives though. You might want to realize that people like me can spot people like you a mile away.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What an insightful reply. Typical of assholes
> more than fed executives though. You might want
> to realize that people like me can spot people
> like you a mile away.


lol sure old man. What a retirement you're living. Posting on here all weekend long, morning till evening. Acting like you're in the club seats while you're really in some shitass apartment in Falls Church, trying to stretch your measly FERS check so they don't cut off your Internet. Why don't you go spend 8 hours reconning another parking garage you old fuckstick.

gerrys gay protector has no life Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HR department Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What an insightful reply. Typical of assholes
> > more than fed executives though. You might
> want
> > to realize that people like me can spot people
> > like you a mile away.
>
>
> lol sure old man. What a retirement you're
> living. Posting on here all weekend long, morning
> till evening. Acting like you're in the club
> seats while you're really in some shitass
> apartment in Falls Church, trying to stretch your
> measly FERS check so they don't cut off your
> Internet. Why don't you go spend 8 hours
> reconning another parking garage you old
> fuckstick.


But he's got UberBlack!

lol

Poor baby! The envy is strong today, isn’t it. Meanwhile a retired life of ease is certainly good here in the sweet spot.

In other news, decades of experience with high ranking officials at quite a number of departments and agencies made me one who was in high demand across the board. It was a fun career, but even the best can’t do it forever.

gerrys gay protector has no life Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HR department Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What an insightful reply. Typical of assholes
> > more than fed executives though. You might
> want
> > to realize that people like me can spot people
> > like you a mile away.
>
>
> lol sure old man. What a retirement you're
> living. Posting on here all weekend long, morning
> till evening. Acting like you're in the club
> seats while you're really in some shitass
> apartment in Falls Church, trying to stretch your
> measly FERS check so they don't cut off your
> Internet. Why don't you go spend 8 hours
> reconning another parking garage you old
> fuckstick.

In addition to my FERS check I also receive dividends from my stock portfolio and rental income from properties I bought along the way. Also made a lot of money flipping houses too so please don't pretend retired Feds are only limited to a FERS check.

Pretty much all those who had the choice at the time chose to stay with CSRS, as these impoverished pansy-asses simply do not know.r

Bruce Klien III here to offer MHO. Anyone posting on this dismal drivel website has not advanced beyond grade 11 or best grade 12. So those of you above trying to impress the trolls that gather here expose their collective stupidity.

This is a fact. The federal government is full of low performing dimwits at anything below grade 15. Even many of the SES'ers of late - especially those hired on during the previous administration are mostly candidates in a fair and open hiring cycle that might score a grade 7.

Hell, the last request for a departmental budget increase that I read written by an SESIII was incomprehensible. We could not determine what the author was attempting to use as justification for a roughly eighty percent IT increase. Just horrendous damage has been done here where the American Taxpayer is stuck paying these exorbitant salaries to people that clearly are inadequate in their roles. PC is ruining this nation.

Just MHO. No need to insult me now because I do not march down that socialist PC Path.

It's still a shame that you're so poorly informed. Have a nice day, but maybe think twice going forward about chiming in where you really have nothing worthwhile to say.

Re: Federal Employees are Grossly Overpaid
Posted by: doubtful ()
Date: August 05, 2018 06:03PM

Bruce Klien III here to offer MHO. Anyone posting on this dismal drivel website has not advanced beyond grade 11 or best grade 12. So those of you above trying to impress the trolls that gather here expose their collective stupidity.

This is a fact. The federal government is full of low performing dimwits at anything below grade 15. Even many of the SES'ers of late - especially those hired on during the previous administration are mostly candidates in a fair and open hiring cycle that might score a grade 7.

Hell, the last request for a departmental budget increase that I read written by an SESIII was incomprehensible. We could not determine what the author was attempting to use as justification for a roughly eighty percent IT increase. Just horrendous damage has been done here where the American Taxpayer is stuck paying these exorbitant salaries to people that clearly are inadequate in their roles. PC is ruining this nation.

Just MHO. No need to insult me now because I do not march down that socialist PC Path.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's still a shame that you're so poorly informed.
> Have a nice day, but maybe think twice going
> forward about chiming in where you really have
> nothing worthwhile to say.


That would be every thread that you post in.

Mission statements are important documents. That’s why everybody has one. They provide a challenge to produce a brief statement that everyone in a given organization can look to for a high order view and guidance to objectives and purposes. Those who have never been at a high level may not be able to appreciate the importance of the task.

^^^When you post your position, title, and name we'll appoint you as arbiter, legitimate, and somewhat qualified to serve in this capacity. Until such action occurs we'll just continue to figure you as a mid-grade 7 wanna be 12. Anyone of real import would not be reading/posting on this mostly childish and uninformed forum. Go suck an egg " HR Department ".



By the way, if you come back with something akin to " I am at a senior level in HR " then please just give it a break. Federal HR Departments are the Epitome of Fraud Waste and Abuse.

I’m retired. All that knowledge and experience that you wish you had. Worthless rookie.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mission statements are important documents.
> That’s why everybody has one. They provide a
> challenge to produce a brief statement that
> everyone in a given organization can look to for a
> high order view and guidance to objectives and
> purposes. Those who have never been at a high
> level may not be able to appreciate the importance
> of the task.


Proves you're a mid-grade 7 wannabe 12.

LOL. I’m still retired. Just like in the post ten minutes ago.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL. I’m still retired. Just like in the post
> ten minutes ago.

Like I said, we're not talking about when you were there in the Kennedy admin Grandpa.

Re: Federal Employees are Grossly Overpaid
Posted by: HR department ()
Date: August 05, 2018 08:33PM

LOL. I’m still retired. Just like in the post ten minutes ago.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Ok, good for you, but I still believe you are or where a 7 wanna be 12. I call B.S. on your status and if you were retired you can state your grade/level, position, and name upon retirement so that we can verify you are qualified to be the sage as you certainly seem t have inserted yourself.

>Mission statements are important documents. T

Come on talk about high performance organizations will you, The feds spend millions on gobblygook to make it look like there doing something useful and PC

"challenge" "high order view" more high horse lol! They used to call them "policy wonks"

phildowneyjr Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Ok, good for you...

Yes, very good. I still do some charity work, but basically, tons of money, no job, and no commuting. Unless you count fifty or so trips per year to the Club Level seats at the ballpark and back.

> ...but I still believe you are or where a 7 wanna be 12.

And I still believe you’re some babbling no account moron. It’s not like I’ve never run into any of those types before.

> ...the sage as you certainly seem to have inserted yourself.

INSERTED? Seriously?

All you were, all you'll ever be Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Like I said, we're not talking about when you were
> there in the Kennedy admin Grandpa.

Actually, not a Grandpa yet, but you ever know. And although I would certainly have qualified as being among ‘the best and the brightest’, I still had a couple more degrees to pick up back in the days of JFK. Nothing wrong with a little overkill on the old resume.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All you were, all you'll ever be Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Like I said, we're not talking about when you
> were
> > there in the Kennedy admin Grandpa.
>
> Actually, not a Grandpa yet, but you ever know.
> And although I would certainly have qualified as
> being among ‘the best and the brightest’, I
> still had a couple more degrees to pick up back in
> the days of JFK. Nothing wrong with a little
> overkill on the old resume.


Should have picked up some more marketable skills so you weren't stuck working as a fed all of your pitiful life. lol

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pretty much all those who had the choice at the
> time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> impoverished pansy-asses simply do not know.r


Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent retirement system. Almost as good as the Federal Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some good retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the high 3 times number of years worked. But you had to pay in 7% over your career. And, while you could contribute to TSP, there was no government match.

FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire after age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from .8% to 4.something% (if you were hired after 2014). Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into social security and get that on the flip side. Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement stool.

The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000 - $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay anything into their plan, it's all covered by the banks. And they get 8% matching on their TSP, which is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars at retirement if you have a long career there and max out your contributions. These employees have the same social security gig as the FERS peeps. These are the true golden plans in the government. Good luck getting in though.

Gender Studies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Should have picked up some more marketable skills
> so you weren't stuck working as a fed all of your
> pitiful life. lol

Oh, I have skills up the wazoo thanks, one of which is toying with the likes of worthless down-scale assholes such as yourself. It's almost cruel to taunt you with the facts the way I do, but to review, I was already an Assistant VP at a major public utility company when a call came with an offer that I could not refuse -- a chance to come to Washington and work on real problems in the world with the leading people in the field. Obviously, I jumped at such an opportunity and went on to do decades worth of high-level work at the top of pops. It was challenging, fulfilling, rewarding, satisfying -- all those neat things that people want in a career that dime-a-dozen, cog-in-a-machine type slug-people will never come to enjoy. Oh, and the money turned out great as well. That's why I live today in an easy comfort that allows me to do what I want, go where I want, and eat what I want without a tinge of financial concern. So eat your heart out, urchin. You never had a chance to board the boat I sailed away on, and that has made all the difference.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't have a choice.

Relevance? By the way, while the Fed is a US government agency, the World Bank is not. You were mixing apples and oranges there.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HR department Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Pretty much all those who had the choice at the
> > time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> > impoverished pansy-asses simply do not know.r
>
>
> Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't
> have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent
> retirement system. Almost as good as the Federal
> Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some good
> retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the high 3
> times number of years worked. But you had to pay
> in 7% over your career. And, while you could
> contribute to TSP, there was no government match.
>
>
> FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire after
> age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from .8%
> to 4.something% (if you were hired after 2014).
> Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP
> contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into
> social security and get that on the flip side.
> Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement
> stool.
>
> The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which
> includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000 -
> $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay
> anything into their plan, it's all covered by the
> banks. And they get 8% matching on their TSP,
> which is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars at
> retirement if you have a long career there and max
> out your contributions. These employees have the
> same social security gig as the FERS peeps. These
> are the true golden plans in the government. Good
> luck getting in though.

FRB employees contribute 7% of their salary towards the retirement plan
and I have no idea where you came up with the numbers on the bonuses
but they are not automatic and only the top performers receive them.
The FRB is on a Pay for Performance salary plan and it shows. Sit on
your duff in this outfit and they will have you looking for another job
in nothing flat. Too bad the Executive Branch doesn't try the same approach
but the FRB doesn't have any employee unions to deal with.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers/new4hire/pdfs/benefit_hndbk/retirement.pdf

The Board of Governors is generally referred to as the Fed or FED. The FRB acronym is generally reserved for uses that refer to one or more of the twelve regional banks that the FED oversees and that act as agents for the FED.

Technically... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Board of Governors is generally referred to as
> the Fed or FED. The FRB acronym is generally
> reserved for uses that refer to one or more of the
> twelve regional banks that the FED oversees and
> that act as agents for the FED.

Employees use FRB as in Federal Reserve Board and sometimes just "the Board". I only worked there for 30 years so maybe I missed something.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't
> have a choice.
>
> Relevance? By the way, while the Fed is a US
> government agency, the World Bank is not. You
> were mixing apples and oranges there.


Ummm, I didn't bring up CSRS, you did. I was simply pointing out that there are better retirement gigs out there than either CSRS or FERS. What was the relevance of bringing up a dead retirement system that hasn't been available to anyone hired in the past 35 years and has about 75000 current feds still working it?

The WB is quasi-governmental, with the US government having veto power over major decisions (the only government with such power) and partners with the US Treasury (as the largest shareholder of the WB). They offer a retirement plan inline with the more generous federal retirement plans (as well as their overall benefit package).

20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HR department Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Pretty much all those who had the choice at
> the
> > > time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> > > impoverished pansy-asses simply do not know.r
> >
> >
> > Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't
> > have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent
> > retirement system. Almost as good as the
> Federal
> > Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some
> good
> > retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the high
> 3
> > times number of years worked. But you had to
> pay
> > in 7% over your career. And, while you could
> > contribute to TSP, there was no government
> match.
> >
> >
> > FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire
> after
> > age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from
> .8%
> > to 4.something% (if you were hired after 2014).
>
> > Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP
> > contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into
> > social security and get that on the flip side.
> > Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement
> > stool.
> >
> > The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which
> > includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000 -
> > $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay
> > anything into their plan, it's all covered by
> the
> > banks. And they get 8% matching on their TSP,
> > which is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars
> at
> > retirement if you have a long career there and
> max
> > out your contributions. These employees have
> the
> > same social security gig as the FERS peeps.
> These
> > are the true golden plans in the government.
> Good
> > luck getting in though.
>
> FRB employees contribute 7% of their salary
> towards the retirement plan
> and I have no idea where you came up with the
> numbers on the bonuses
> but they are not automatic and only the top
> performers receive them.
> The FRB is on a Pay for Performance salary plan
> and it shows. Sit on
> your duff in this outfit and they will have you
> looking for another job
> in nothing flat. Too bad the Executive Branch
> doesn't try the same approach
> but the FRB doesn't have any employee unions to
> deal with.
>
> https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers/new4hire/pd
> fs/benefit_hndbk/retirement.pdf


The Fed has an automatic 1% contribution, regardless of whether an employee contributes or not. They then match up to an additional 7%, bringing the ceiling up to 8%.

The Fed is no different than any other federal institution. It most certainly has dead wood. It's laughable that you think differently.

I'm not positive about the union or not, but I'm pretty sure they have one (nteu), which is the union that most of the federal financial institutions have.

It's a fact that their retirement is better than either CSRS or FERS. If you retired from there after 30 years, you'd know that. And perhaps the average bonuses of the higher graded (25 and higher) weren't that great when you were there, but now days, they are $5000 or larger for anyone who isn't a complete loser.

These are simply facts. Why you try and argue them is puzzling. Perhaps you just one of those type of people who argue about everything. Good luck with that.

20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Employees use FRB as in Federal Reserve Board and
> sometimes just "the Board". I only worked there
> for 30 years so maybe I missed something.

Apparently, you did. The Board of Governors (with the FOMC) is the FED. It's the 12 member banks that are FRB's -- as in FRBNY.

What about the Inter American Development Bank?
Since inception the USA has contributed over one
trillion in tax payer funded projects in latin
countries. Great retirement packages at 2.7%
per year. Managers earn 250k and beyond.
American born generally do not get hired.
I heard it is a better gig than the World Bank.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ummm, I didn't bring up CSRS, you did.

It was actually brought up by "gerrys gay protector has no life" -- a sorry-ass handle of the usual Falls Church asshole -- who suggested that I receive FERS checks. I don't.

> The WB is quasi-governmental, with the US
> government having veto power over major decisions
> (the only government with such power) and partners
> with the US Treasury (as the largest shareholder
> of the WB).

The World Bank is a multilateral IFI, you dope. It is not at all a USG entity while the Fed -- a creation of the US Congress -- most definitely is.

The know all poster with username H R Department
was a warehouse worker at the gs5 step 10 level
over a thirty-two year career of chicken wing
lunch eating days.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > HR department Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Pretty much all those who had the choice at
> > the
> > > > time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> > > > impoverished pansy-asses simply do not
> know.r
> > >
> > >
> > > Of course. But anyone hired after 1984
> didn't
> > > have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent
> > > retirement system. Almost as good as the
> > Federal
> > > Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some
> > good
> > > retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the
> high
> > 3
> > > times number of years worked. But you had to
> > pay
> > > in 7% over your career. And, while you could
> > > contribute to TSP, there was no government
> > match.
> > >
> > >
> > > FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire
> > after
> > > age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from
> > .8%
> > > to 4.something% (if you were hired after
> 2014).
> >
> > > Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP
> > > contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into
> > > social security and get that on the flip side.
>
> > > Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement
> > > stool.
> > >
> > > The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which
> > > includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000
> -
> > > $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay
> > > anything into their plan, it's all covered by
> > the
> > > banks. And they get 8% matching on their
> TSP,
> > > which is worth hundreds of thousands of
> dollars
> > at
> > > retirement if you have a long career there
> and
> > max
> > > out your contributions. These employees have
> > the
> > > same social security gig as the FERS peeps.
> > These
> > > are the true golden plans in the government.
> > Good
> > > luck getting in though.
> >
> > FRB employees contribute 7% of their salary
> > towards the retirement plan
> > and I have no idea where you came up with the
> > numbers on the bonuses
> > but they are not automatic and only the top
> > performers receive them.
> > The FRB is on a Pay for Performance salary plan
> > and it shows. Sit on
> > your duff in this outfit and they will have you
> > looking for another job
> > in nothing flat. Too bad the Executive Branch
> > doesn't try the same approach
> > but the FRB doesn't have any employee unions to
> > deal with.
> >
> >
> https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers/new4hire/pd
>
> > fs/benefit_hndbk/retirement.pdf
>
>
> The Fed has an automatic 1% contribution,
> regardless of whether an employee contributes or
> not. They then match up to an additional 7%,
> bringing the ceiling up to 8%.

Coverage Cost

As a participant, you are required to contribute 7 percent of your basic salary to the Board Plan. For purposes of this Plan, basic salary means your regular annual pay plus differential for certain categories of participants, excluding any bonuses, overtime pay, and other extra compensation. These contributions are deducted from your biweekly paychecks on an aftertax basis and sent to the Retirement Trust to be credited to your contribution account. The Board pays any balance of the Plan cost. Your contributions may be refunded if you leave the Board. However, if you withdraw your mandatory contributions, you give up any rights to a retirement benefit. If you do not have contributions in the Plan for any period of service — either because you did not make contributions or because you withdrew contributions — you can make a deposit or redeposit (plus interest) anytime before your retirement date. While you are required to make a 7 percent contribution to the Plan, you are not covered under Social Security. Therefore, your wages are not subject to Social Security tax withholding requirements.



> The Fed is no different than any other federal
> institution. It most certainly has dead wood.
> It's laughable that you think differently.

Lets say they take Pay for Performance very seriously. I was there when we made
the transition from rubber stamping GS and OPM guidelines and it was like the difference between day and night for the better. Some jobs were eliminated and some were consolidated with others. Some were just plain downgraded as a result of years of "grade creep". (No more GS/FR Grade 12 secretaries)

> I'm not positive about the union or not, but I'm
> pretty sure they have one (nteu), which is the
> union that most of the federal financial
> institutions have.



> It's a fact that their retirement is better than
> either CSRS or FERS. If you retired from there
> after 30 years, you'd know that. And perhaps the
> average bonuses of the higher graded (25 and
> higher) weren't that great when you were there,
> but now days, they are $5000 or larger for anyone
> who isn't a complete loser.

I know it's a better plan and never said it wasn't. Guess what? Not everybody
is a 25 or higher.



> These are simply facts. Why you try and argue
> them is puzzling. Perhaps you just one of those
> type of people who argue about everything. Good
> luck with that.

IRMC

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ummm, I didn't bring up CSRS, you did.
>
> It was actually brought up by "gerrys gay
> protector has no life" -- a sorry-ass handle of
> the usual Falls Church asshole -- who suggested
> that I receive FERS checks. I don't.
>
> > The WB is quasi-governmental, with the US
> > government having veto power over major
> decisions
> > (the only government with such power) and
> partners
> > with the US Treasury (as the largest
> shareholder
> > of the WB).
>
> The World Bank is a multilateral IFI, you dope.
> It is not at all a USG entity while the Fed -- a
> creation of the US Congress -- most definitely is.


Just went back and checked. No, it was definitely you who brought up CSRS.

The WB has a really nice retirement plan. Whether it is a part of the federal government or not. As I said, it's quasi-governmental and US employees also get social security as well and get good all around benefits modeled after the best of the FIRREA benefits. Nice gig if you can get in.

Also heard that Fairfax County has/had a good retirement system. And federal LE is also a good plan (I think they still get 2%, and that's based on a 25% premium pay increase). SES retirees are making $150K, plus TSP, plus social security. Course, you have to be a LE, which would suck for most people.

20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:

> Coverage Cost
>
> As a participant, you are required to contribute 7
> percent of your basic salary to the Board Plan.
> For purposes of this Plan, basic salary means your
> regular annual pay plus differential for certain
> categories of participants, excluding any bonuses,
> overtime pay, and other extra compensation. These
> contributions are deducted from your biweekly
> paychecks on an aftertax basis and sent to the
> Retirement Trust to be credited to your
> contribution account. The Board pays any balance
> of the Plan cost. Your contributions may be
> refunded if you leave the Board. However, if you
> withdraw your mandatory contributions, you give up
> any rights to a retirement benefit. If you do not
> have contributions in the Plan for any period of
> service — either because you did not make
> contributions or because you withdrew
> contributions — you can make a deposit or
> redeposit (plus interest) anytime before your
> retirement date. While you are required to make a
> 7 percent contribution to the Plan, you are not
> covered under Social Security. Therefore, your
> wages are not subject to Social Security tax
> withholding requirements.



Dude, my wife is covered under the board's plan. She pays NOTHING. She gets 8% MATCH on her TSP contributions. She also pays social security. Maybe you're confused about the board vs. the banks (I know nothing about what the banks retirement is). The board used to have an old CSRS-style plan way back in the day, but they converted over after the federal government did. The boards plan is 1.3% of high 3 (including bonuses, overtime, and other awards) times year of service up to the current social security integration rate and 1.8% on anything over that. If you're a 25 or higher, that averages out to about 1.6%.

HR department Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It was actually brought up by "gerrys gay
> protector has no life" -- a sorry-ass handle of
> the usual Falls Church asshole -- who suggested
> that I receive FERS checks. I don't.

Wrong again. I don't care what kind of paltry retirement check you get. Nor, do I give a shit about Gerry and his protector.

Seriously, you need some help. Just because I regularly own your ass doesn't mean I am behind every post directed at you or every post about you.

Are you ever correct about anything? Why do you presume me to be behind every post about you? Have I scarred you that badly?

Starting tomorrow, I'm out of the country for a couple of weeks. Unlike you, when I am engaged in leisure activities, I am not posting on this website. If you think I am posting over the next two weeks, it is proof positive I live in your addled brain for free.

Again, get some help.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
>
> > Coverage Cost
> >
> > As a participant, you are required to contribute
> 7
> > percent of your basic salary to the Board Plan.
> > For purposes of this Plan, basic salary means
> your
> > regular annual pay plus differential for
> certain
> > categories of participants, excluding any
> bonuses,
> > overtime pay, and other extra compensation.
> These
> > contributions are deducted from your biweekly
> > paychecks on an aftertax basis and sent to the
> > Retirement Trust to be credited to your
> > contribution account. The Board pays any
> balance
> > of the Plan cost. Your contributions may be
> > refunded if you leave the Board. However, if
> you
> > withdraw your mandatory contributions, you give
> up
> > any rights to a retirement benefit. If you do
> not
> > have contributions in the Plan for any period
> of
> > service — either because you did not make
> > contributions or because you withdrew
> > contributions — you can make a deposit or
> > redeposit (plus interest) anytime before your
> > retirement date. While you are required to make
> a
> > 7 percent contribution to the Plan, you are not
> > covered under Social Security. Therefore, your
> > wages are not subject to Social Security tax
> > withholding requirements.
>
>
>
> Dude, my wife is covered under the board's plan.
> She pays NOTHING. She gets 8% MATCH on her TSP
> contributions. She also pays social security.
> Maybe you're confused about the board vs. the
> banks (I know nothing about what the banks
> retirement is). The board used to have an old
> CSRS-style plan way back in the day, but they
> converted over after the federal government did.
> The boards plan is 1.3% of high 3 (including
> bonuses, overtime, and other awards) times year of
> service up to the current social security
> integration rate and 1.8% on anything over that.
> If you're a 25 or higher, that averages out to
> about 1.6%.

So you're saying the info posted on the Board's website is erroneous?
BTW, do they still serve pecan pie in the cafeteria?

I'm saying that I know what the fed's retirement plan is because my wife is in it.

I don't know about what they serve in the cafeteria. I don't work there.

2011 Towncar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But he's got UberBlack! lol

The Falls Church Asshole is bent out of shape again. What a miserable life that douchebag lives!

He got you to post by simply bringing up an embarrassing fuck up from your past. Looks to me like he pwns your ass.

serious pwnage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He got you to post by simply bringing up an
> embarrassing fuck up from your past. Looks to me
> like he pwns your ass.

What you own is a well-deserved reputation as a pathetic asshole -- one with no actual knowledge of "fine wines" at all.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> serious pwnage Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He got you to post by simply bringing up an
> > embarrassing fuck up from your past. Looks to
> me
> > like he pwns your ass.
>
> What you own is a well-deserved reputation as a
> pathetic asshole -- one with no actual knowledge
> of "fine wines" at all.


Watching you cry when you get bitch slapped is funny.

Your continual need to try to impress people on a half-assed local forum who don't know you and don't give a fuck is telling and kind of pitiful.

I own you Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrong again. I don't care what kind of paltry
> retirement check you get.

The checks are hardly paltry, and that fact actually does trouble you a great deal. After all, they serve to underscore the financial gulf that separates you holed up over there in the dusty dumps of Falls Church City from me out here enjoying life in the heart of the Sweet Spot. We call that feeling you're having right now "burning envy."

> Are you ever correct about anything?

Virtually always.

> Why do you presume me to be behind every post about you?

Because you are in plain fact such a pathetic little groupie.

> Starting tomorrow, I'm out of the country for a
> couple of weeks.

No, you aren't. You'll be right here, just as always. You're hoping to set up and hide behind a phony "different poster" scam. It's a joke how utterly transparent you are.

> If you think I am posting over the next two weeks, it is
> proof positive I live in your addled brain for free.

No, it will be proof posituive that you are a feckless liar who was in fact posting here while claiming not to be. What a rank and stupid jerk you are.

^^^^^ Sure thing, shit for brains. The fact that you can’t differentiate between multiple posters only adds humor to the fact that you are the butt of many people’s jokes. I get it though, your fragile ego won’t let you accept the reputation you’ve so richly earned.

Just as predicted. But shouldn’t you be off packing for the “big trip”? LOL!

Lol... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just as predicted. But shouldn’t you be off
> packing for the “big trip”? LOL!

What was predicted? Your continued inability to see you're the laughing stock of many on this forum?

All packed and ready to go for the trip. UberBlack will be here tomorrow afternoon for the trip to the airport. Seems I "have" it too. I hope its not some late model piece of shit hooptie like a Town Car. Oh wait, it can't be as a Town Car doesn't qualify for UberBlack and nor has it for quite a few years. Discerning customers wouldn't tolerate such squalor. LOL!

you were cheap to buy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What was predicted?

Your assfuck claim of all these other posters, each of whom turns out to be exactly as dumb as you are. That’s quite an uncommon level of dumbness, meaning that they are all actually you. Like anyone would ever have thought any differently.

> All packed and ready to go for the trip.

Great! Looking forward to two weeks of trashing your posts without having to endure the hapless assfuckery of your ignorant attempts at reply. You can sit and stew for a fortnight over what will be waiting for you when you “get back.”

> UberBlack will be here tomorrow afternoon for the
> trip to the airport. Seems I "have" it too. I
> hope its not some late model piece of shit hooptie
> like a Town Car. Oh wait, it can't be as a Town
> Car doesn't qualify for UberBlack and nor has it
> for quite a few years. Discerning customers
> wouldn't tolerate such squalor. LOL!

You’re not discerning in the least. You just make a mess all over the room.

Again, the fact that your fragile ego doesn't allow you to recognize the fact that you are the butt of numerous jokes only adds to the humor.

Dude, you’re barely the equivalent of a tenth grader. You and all the Fail Army sock puppets you can muster are not going to make an actual impression here.

DOI

it's in the Declaration of Independence

europe / england was abusing the poor by keeping "barriers to entry" to jobs to keep supply of workers low and pay high. pretty much using government and wealth to keep the poor from working or earning

it was called "unionism" (different meaning than today)

it's one of many reasons people had when they left europe for America, and George Washington was certainly aware of it

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

Lol... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dude, you’re barely the equivalent of a tenth
> grader. You and all the Fail Army sock puppets
> you can muster are not going to make an actual
> impression here.


You lost, again. Deal with it. If you think making an impression here matters one scintilla of evidence, you are forgetting the fact that you are a laughing stock of this forum.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm saying that I know what the fed's retirement
> plan is because my wife is in it.

I don't believe a word you're saying.

> I don't know about what they serve in the
> cafeteria. I don't work there.

Ask your imaginary wife about the meaning of pecan pie at the Board.

time to accept facts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lost, again. Deal with it. If you think making
> an impression here matters one scintilla of
> evidence, you are forgetting the fact that you are
> a laughing stock of this forum.

Reminder: Your staggering array of past misadventures here has proven that you don't in fact know anything about food, or wine, or coffee, or Viera, or baseball, or scallops, or water taxis, or retirement communities, or water on Mars, or executive car services, or a place called Esca (to imply restaurants in general), or the Water Wars, or even where freaking "downtown" is. You are a god of crude misinformation, a consistently wrong and simplistic douchebag constrained to life in the dumps of long ago outclassed Falls Church City while continuously needing to lie about such a limited existence in order to feel more up to the standards of what far more talented others have rather easily managed to accomplish in front of you. The bottom line for you here has really been pretty depressing. Oh well.

Let's not leave out the streets of Vienna that Water Taxi Boy has repeatedly made a fool of himself over. It's Electric Avenue (not Park Street) that typically supports travel from the Dunn Loring area over to Anita's and the delightful Fresh Market. And speaking of Park Street, the Northwest Passage was easier to find than the supposed Vienna side-street cut-through from southbound Gallows Road over to Park Street. What a blithering idiot this guy is.

And as for his precious Falls Church City, we in the Dunn Loring area have easy access to it via Idylwood Road, but with Tysons, Vienna, and the Mosaic District all as nearby alternatives, who would ever actually go there? The place has no shopping, dining, or other amenities at all. It's a proverbial wasteland.

Thanks for the tip Barb, and of course you're quite right. Those of us in the vicinity of Gallows and Cedar Lane have no real use for Falls Church at all. It's out of step and out of the way. Do these people seriously think that their Target is going to draw people away from the one at the Mosaic District? Seriously? That's not even a thought. Mosaic is a whole community of great places. The Target in Falls Church is in the middle of a drive-by dead zone. I'd have to live right next door even to consider going there, but living right next door would be a really really bad thing to have to do! I'll be staying right here for sure and loving every minute of it. Maybe we should grab the boys and go downtown to Acqua al 2 again sometime soon. That was fun.

The side streets of Vienna can be pretty confusing. Especially to people who have never been here and only have google maps to go by.

^ Crazy old dude's talking to himself again. lol

Just a walk down memory lane. Of course, they are all sad memories for you.

^ And still can't figure out who's posting. lol

Amateur Local Historian — bwahahahahahaha!!!

^ Just makes it more funny.

Yours is a long and continuous history of one stupid-ass failure after another. There just isn’t anything that you do well.

Nice brah.

Living large.

lol

Things in the Sweet Spot would seem to be well beyond your limited FCC-dump comprehension.

I like how you made the mulch complement the free-form driveway.


lol

You live in a dump. Because you are too poor to afford life in the Sweet Spot. Sucks to be you. Would you like a bag of pretzels?

Nothing sweet about 1950s construction with carport. lol

Do me a favor fly-boy and talk to the County assessment people. They seem stuck on deep seven figures.

Lol... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do me a favor fly-boy and talk to the County
> assessment people. They seem stuck on deep seven
> figures.


Die already old man so we can bulldoze that eyesore and put up some $2 mil luxury 'townehomes.' It's a drag on valuations.

Lol... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do me a favor fly-boy and talk to the County
> assessment people. They seem stuck on deep seven
> figures.


6.5 of which are land value.

-$10K offset for the carport. lol

You couldn’t afford my shed. It’s gorgeous, of course (top-grade cypress), but it’s still a shed.

Lavatory Occupied Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You couldn’t afford my shed. It’s gorgeous,
> of course (top-grade cypress), but it’s still a
> shed.


And your 1950s carport is still a carport.

Thinks that he's impressing anyone with a shed...

Proud of that are ya? lmao!

Carport is from 2006. Shed is from 2007. Each is much larger than your living room and insured for more than the value of your #1 car. Quality cypress easily goes for $30 per sqft after all.

20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm saying that I know what the fed's
> retirement
> > plan is because my wife is in it.
>
> I don't believe a word you're saying.
>
> > I don't know about what they serve in the
> > cafeteria. I don't work there.
>
> Ask your imaginary wife about the meaning of pecan
> pie at the Board.


Nah. You're apparently just some angry old dude who is acting like you used to work at the Fed but don't even know what the retirement system is. Instead you google it. You're not worth the effort to prove you wrong.

For the rest of you, the Fed and WB have the best retirements around. Much better than FERS and better than CSRS if you make over $150K a year there (not that hard to do). All the FIRREA agencies have great benefit packages, but the Fed is the best because of the retirement. Don't listen to the angry old dude. Unless he retired from there 25 years ago, he doesn't know anything about the retirement system there because it changed over to a combined defined benefit/defined contribution plan decades ago right after FERS came around.

^^^ I’m not convinced.

Left engine shut down Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Carport is from 2006. Shed is from 2007. Each is
> much larger than your living room and insured for
> more than the value of your #1 car. Quality
> cypress easily goes for $30 per sqft after all.


Wait... so you actually had to add a carport to that shit shack? LOL!

Hahahahahahahaha

What will you try to impress us with next, the decking for the above-ground pool?

LMAO!

You’re really not very bright, are you. Like many great homes, ours is the product of a series of architectural renovations. By the time of Reno #4, the original carport needed to make way for a second patio level and a new water feature. It looks great. The more recent $3500 addition of new gravel in front of the new carport looks great too. All landscaped to the nines of course. There is really nothing like it anywhere in Falls Church.

Gravel?

I didn't really think that you could top above-ground pool decking, but you did. lmao

Anytime that your benchmark is Falls Church, you're aiming way too low.

There could be much that you don’t realize, but stately gravel driveways are a fairly common feature of upscale homes in this area.

Love the new 'patio level.'





lol

Not sure where that house is, but there's nothing like that anywhere in my neighborhood, and of course, there wouldn't be space enough for it anywhere in yours.

It's obvious you're not sure about almost anything. You're just a sad little man living on a government pension who lies on the underground to try and impress strangers because your own family won't talk to you anymore.

Sad, lying. ex-government loser. Way to go gramps! Now go gum your mush before your angry black caregiver beats your sorry ass again.

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I'm saying that I know what the fed's
> > retirement
> > > plan is because my wife is in it.
> >
> > I don't believe a word you're saying.
> >
> > > I don't know about what they serve in the
> > > cafeteria. I don't work there.
> >
> > Ask your imaginary wife about the meaning of
> pecan
> > pie at the Board.
>
>
> Nah. You're apparently just some angry old dude
> who is acting like you used to work at the Fed but
> don't even know what the retirement system is.
> Instead you google it. You're not worth the
> effort to prove you wrong.

Angry? No way. I know where my retirement pay stubs come from.
If you had a wife who works there she could get the recipe for the
world class pecan pie.


> For the rest of you, the Fed and WB have the best
> retirements around. Much better than FERS and
> better than CSRS if you make over $150K a year
> there (not that hard to do). All the FIRREA
> agencies have great benefit packages, but the Fed
> is the best because of the retirement. Don't
> listen to the angry old dude. Unless he retired
> from there 25 years ago, he doesn't know anything
> about the retirement system there because it
> changed over to a combined defined benefit/defined
> contribution plan decades ago right after FERS
> came around.

I hear they even have a swimming pool on the roof of the
Eccles Building now but don't tell anybody because if word gets
out everybody else will want one too.

Keep in mind that the Fed funds itself. It does not receive any regular appropriations of taxpayer dollars. It does however regularly send its excess profits off to the Treasury. Since 2010, those payments have run in the range of $80 to $90 billion per year.

Sounds like a bargain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Keep in mind that the Fed funds itself. It does
> not receive any regular appropriations of taxpayer
> dollars. It does however regularly send its
> excess profits off to the Treasury. Since 2010,
> those payments have run in the range of $80 to $90
> billion per year.

Precisely. Plus not having to put up with the fiscal budgeting process makes
life much more pleasant. Just kidding about the pool though. :)

There was indeed a pool at one time (though not on the roof) and of course the tennis courts out back. Not sure if either of them is there anymore.

20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HR department Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Pretty much all those who had the choice at
> the
> > > time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> > > impoverished pansy-asses simply do not know.r
> >
> >
> > Of course. But anyone hired after 1984 didn't
> > have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent
> > retirement system. Almost as good as the
> Federal
> > Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some
> good
> > retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the high
> 3
> > times number of years worked. But you had to
> pay
> > in 7% over your career. And, while you could
> > contribute to TSP, there was no government
> match.
> >
> >
> > FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire
> after
> > age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from
> .8%
> > to 4.something% (if you were hired after 2014).
>
> > Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP
> > contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into
> > social security and get that on the flip side.
> > Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement
> > stool.
> >
> > The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which
> > includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000 -
> > $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay
> > anything into their plan, it's all covered by
> the
> > banks. And they get 8% matching on their TSP,
> > which is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars
> at
> > retirement if you have a long career there and
> max
> > out your contributions. These employees have
> the
> > same social security gig as the FERS peeps.
> These
> > are the true golden plans in the government.
> Good
> > luck getting in though.
>
> FRB employees contribute 7% of their salary
> towards the retirement plan
> and I have no idea where you came up with the
> numbers on the bonuses
> but they are not automatic and only the top
> performers receive them.
> The FRB is on a Pay for Performance salary plan
> and it shows. Sit on
> your duff in this outfit and they will have you
> looking for another job
> in nothing flat. Too bad the Executive Branch
> doesn't try the same approach
> but the FRB doesn't have any employee unions to
> deal with.
>
> https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers/new4hire/pd
> fs/benefit_hndbk/retirement.pdf


That's a bogus page. You can't get to it from the website. The general benefits can be found here...

https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers-benefits.htm (note the mention of the TSP).

To view the real handbook requires an valid user ID and password on the plan's adminstrators (Anon Hewitt) website. That can be found at www.federalreservebenefits.org. Below is the title page of last year's handbook.

The real question is why you want to lie about all this. Quite bizarre.


.
Attachments:

FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 20th & Constitution (retired) Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FIRREA is the way to go Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > HR department Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Pretty much all those who had the choice at
> > the
> > > > time chose to stay with CSRS, as these
> > > > impoverished pansy-asses simply do not
> know.r
> > >
> > >
> > > Of course. But anyone hired after 1984
> didn't
> > > have a choice. CSRS was a most excellent
> > > retirement system. Almost as good as the
> > Federal
> > > Reserve and World Bank. Now those are some
> > good
> > > retirement systems. CSRS has a 2% of the
> high
> > 3
> > > times number of years worked. But you had to
> > pay
> > > in 7% over your career. And, while you could
> > > contribute to TSP, there was no government
> > match.
> > >
> > >
> > > FERS has a 1% match (or 1.1% if you retire
> > after
> > > age 62) and you have to pay in anywhere from
> > .8%
> > > to 4.something% (if you were hired after
> 2014).
> >
> > > Plus, you get up to a 5% match on TSP
> > > contributions. FERS employees pay 6.2% into
> > > social security and get that on the flip side.
>
> > > Thus, the three legs of the FERS retirement
> > > stool.
> > >
> > > The WB and FR have 1.6% of your high 3 (which
> > > includes any bonuses you get - usually $5000
> -
> > > $7000 a year), plus the employees don't pay
> > > anything into their plan, it's all covered by
> > the
> > > banks. And they get 8% matching on their
> TSP,
> > > which is worth hundreds of thousands of
> dollars
> > at
> > > retirement if you have a long career there
> and
> > max
> > > out your contributions. These employees have
> > the
> > > same social security gig as the FERS peeps.
> > These
> > > are the true golden plans in the government.
> > Good
> > > luck getting in though.
> >
> > FRB employees contribute 7% of their salary
> > towards the retirement plan
> > and I have no idea where you came up with the
> > numbers on the bonuses
> > but they are not automatic and only the top
> > performers receive them.
> > The FRB is on a Pay for Performance salary plan
> > and it shows. Sit on
> > your duff in this outfit and they will have you
> > looking for another job
> > in nothing flat. Too bad the Executive Branch
> > doesn't try the same approach
> > but the FRB doesn't have any employee unions to
> > deal with.
> >
> >
> https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers/new4hire/pd
>
> > fs/benefit_hndbk/retirement.pdf
>
>
> That's a bogus page. You can't get to it from the
> website. The general benefits can be found
> here...
>
> https://www.federalreserve.gov/careers-benefits.ht
> m (note the mention of the TSP).
>
> To view the real handbook requires an valid user
> ID and password on the plan's adminstrators (Anon
> Hewitt) website. That can be found at
> www.federalreservebenefits.org. Below is the
> title page of last year's handbook.
>
> The real question is why you want to lie about all
> this. Quite bizarre.
>
>
> .

If you think I'm lying that's fine with me because I could care less.
What I find bizarre is your claim that your wife works there and contributes
nothing towards her pension plan. I know I did and new hires are no
exception. "Bogus page"? LOL! Now about that pecan pie....

Work on the backhand at lunch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There was indeed a pool at one time (though not on
> the roof) and of course the tennis courts out
> back. Not sure if either of them is there
> anymore.

I can assure you there was never a pool. That was something we used
to joke about when folks in the Executive Branch accused of being the
"Club Fed". The tennis courts used to be open to the public with a
reservation but not sure about now because so much changed after 9/11.

The only reason to have a 'stately' gravel drive is that you can't afford to have it paved. Or one might go with stone or nicely done stamped concrete, etc. for a nicer home. But we all know both that and the nicer home are way over your pay grade as a retired fed living in a 50s-construction rambler in Dunn Loring. lol

Leonard Metal Carports Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only reason to have a 'stately' gravel drive
> is that you can't afford to have it paved. Or one
> might go with stone or nicely done stamped
> concrete, etc. for a nicer home. But we all know
> both that and the nicer home are way over your pay
> grade as a retired fed living in a
> 50s-construction rambler in Dunn Loring. lol


There can't be two fucking old retired douchebags on this thread that can be as stupid as the asshole trying to tell us Falls Church is the same as Great Falls or the pecan pie faggot. Thus, we have to assume it is just one old retired douchbag who has nothing better to do than post on here constantly (when he's not reconning parking garages for 15 hours). It's obvious Alzheimer's has set in badly. He'll start arguing with himself here shortly.

Leftist.Gorilla's ashamed kid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leonard Metal Carports Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The only reason to have a 'stately' gravel
> drive
> > is that you can't afford to have it paved. Or
> one
> > might go with stone or nicely done stamped
> > concrete, etc. for a nicer home. But we all
> know
> > both that and the nicer home are way over your
> pay
> > grade as a retired fed living in a
> > 50s-construction rambler in Dunn Loring. lol
>
>
> There can't be two fucking old retired douchebags
> on this thread that can be as stupid as the
> asshole trying to tell us Falls Church is the same
> as Great Falls or the pecan pie faggot. Thus, we
> have to assume it is just one old retired douchbag
> who has nothing better to do than post on here
> constantly (when he's not reconning parking
> garages for 15 hours). It's obvious Alzheimer's
> has set in badly. He'll start arguing with
> himself here shortly.


Agreed for the most part. However, I doubt this poster is really old or retired. More like a 13 year old waiting for school to start up again. I don't know any old people who troll forums. If true, that would be truly sad.

God, you’re stupid. Gravel creates a permeable surface. That’s important in helping to curb erosion and pollution and preserve the ecological beauty and balance that help define life in the Sweet Spot. Dumbasses living in places that have been allowed to deteriorate into dusty dumps might not have any reason for such concerns of course. They can go ahead snd crap the place up without making any real difference. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

I espy an abundance of envy and butthurt oozing out from some of those not presently posting while enjoying a soothing biweekly pedicure that will be followed by lunch at an upscale area restaurant that many cannot afford to dine at either. Such a pity for the huddled masses...

Yeah, your little 30' strip will make all the difference when we've paved 80% of NoVA. Right down the road from the massive new 50-Gallows intersection and Mosaic development that you love so much which creates 100-year runoff events all on its own. lol

The only reason that you can get away with the cheap fix is that you live in a crappy 50s construction rambler. The 'stately' Frednecksburg gravel drive would never be approved in any better neighborhoods. That's the kind of shit that you see in West Springfield so the illegals can park 6 cars and a landscape truck in the yard.

I own you Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Starting tomorrow, I'm out of the country for a
> couple of weeks. Unlike you, when I am engaged in
> leisure activities, I am not posting on this
> website. If you think I am posting over the next
> two weeks, it is proof positive I live in your
> addled brain for free.

LOL! Dumbshit has been posting continuously despite the above. What s ridiculous horse’s ass.

Flight grounded Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I own you Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Starting tomorrow, I'm out of the country for a
> > couple of weeks. Unlike you, when I am engaged
> in
> > leisure activities, I am not posting on this
> > website. If you think I am posting over the
> next
> > two weeks, it is proof positive I live in your
> > addled brain for free.
>
> LOL! Dumbshit has been posting continuously
> despite the above. What s ridiculous horse’s
> ass.


Yeah... Except I'm not him stupid. lmao

Awwww
Attachments: