SIuj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Historian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bakhtaran Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > nigga what? Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > So they support kids protesting shit they
> > don't
> > > > like, but what if the kids walked out to
> > > protest
> > > > BLM or one of the terrorist nigger
> > > organizations?
> > > >
> > > > College has lost it's value on so many
> > > fronts...GW
> > > > stopped using test scores to evaluate
> > students
> > > so
> > > > I guess this is just the next thing. Maybe
> > > just
> > > > let in the illegals and mud people and say
> > fuck
> > > > it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Studies show time and again standardized
> tests
> > are
> > > an imperfect metric for determining
> > intelligence/
> > > academic abilities in a collegiate
> environment.
> > > There are even graduate programs within Ivy
> > League
> > > schools that aren’t requiring applicants to
> > > provide GRE scores.
> >
> > That simply isn't true. SAT and GRE continue
> to
> > be the best prediction tools for success in
> > college and grad school.
>
>
> No they aren’t. Standardized tests at judging
> one thing only, how well you take said tests. They
> are not accurate predictors of a students
> potential for academic excellence. Numerous
> studies have been done on this.
Agreed. Here's links to evidence they aren't the best.
http://news.psu.edu/story/165456/2010/08/23/standardized-tests-not-always-best-indicator-success
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/nail-biting-standardized-testing-may-miss-mark-college-students
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/02/19/study-finds-little-difference-academic-success-students-who-do-and-dont-submit-sat