causeican Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Fairfax City didn’t give away their reservoir
> to Loudoun for a few pennies to purchase meth for
> the mayor, they would have been a good position to
> make some money off the county's increasing water
> needs. It’s discouraging to live amongst people
> who enable such misconduct.
And if you weren't a dickhead that gets off on bullshit, you'd tell the truth.
I won't 'enable such misconduct'
Fact:
A mayor can't just make such a decision. It also takes the Fairfax City Council.
Actual truth from a credible source:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-state-of-nova/post/fairfax-city-ready-to-join-fairfax-countys-water-utility-county-water-wars-may-be-near-an-end/2013/02/25/c5cda150-7fa3-11e2-8074-b26a871b165a_blog.html?utm_term=.01fbb5fda725
Fairfax City was in a tough spot. Its 50-year-old treatment plant in Ashburn and 23-mile transmission pipe to Fairfax City need a $45 million upgrade, which would require a bond referendum, at additional cost to its customers. In 20 years, the plant would need to be replaced, at a further cost of an estimated $84 million.
At present, Fairfax City is charging its residential customers $4.61 per 1,000 gallons, compared to Fairfax Water’s rate of $2.51. At an estimated use of 100,000 gallons per year, that’s $461 for city residents and $251 for county residents. With annual cost increases of seven percent plus the bond issue, the city’s annual cost was estimated to rise to $894 per residential customer, versus about $340 for Fairfax Water.
In addition, Fairfax Water has already upgraded its treatment facilities, and any further costs would be spread over a much larger customer base than Fairfax City’s 11,500, of which about 1,300 are commercial users. "This is putting money back in people’s pockets," city Councilman Dan Drummond said, "with cheaper, higher quality water and with more certainty in the future." He said it was equivalent to a 10-cent reduction in the real estate tax.