Those graves need to be dug up, the bodies removed and the headstones destroyed.

They already confiscated the Lee house and built a us cemetary on it. That's enough

I disagree...we don't need to honor those who were summarily defeated. I say...dig 'em up, burn the remains and destroy the headstones.

This is not about honoring slavers or erasing history. This is about discontinuing the practice of honoring those who took up arms against the United States government...and lost.

What those people did was dishonorable and they need not be remembered. Next time? Don't lose the fucking war and you can do what you want.

If the US govt thought that was appropriate, they would have done it in 1866. Why now 150 yrs later. What has changed?

The US Govt had a sense of nobility and a respect for their vanquished foe.

SJW's of today lack any such nobility and honor.

The SJW's are similar to the Radical Republicans who wanted to destroy the South after the war. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed after the war.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/17/2017 03:56PM by phelpsmarc.

Billy.T.Sherman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those graves need to be dug up, the bodies removed
> and the headstones destroyed.
Attachments:

The OP

This just in:
The south lost the war and hundreds of thousands of lives along with it. Their soldiers are just as worthy of an honorable burial as the winners.

Go find yourself a life and something important to do to contribute to society and quit wasting your life with such drivel.

Billy.T.Sherman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those graves need to be dug up, the bodies removed
> and the headstones destroyed.
Attachments:

Hillary Lost..

In Case Assholes don't know..13 people were Killed by terrorists in Spain today..The USA is moving on..

Now be cool like this NY Guy.... Be Happy its Summer...Enjoy and Chill..Damm It!! LOL..Libs..all hepped up scared to death of statues now...BOO!!

DAJAX.."Cool Daddy O" Young guy with his Family..Chilling...summer vacation..
Attachments:

A troll drops content to elicit a response, regardless of their personal feelings.

I genuinely want to see all memory of the Confederacy erased.

And that's all there is to it with what you've said about exhuming the dead

GO..Just GO ..You Wicked Senseless Bastard To Hell.. You Will When You Die.. so We Can Erase any Memory Of YOUR WORDS

DAJAX

You lost, sir. A group of people from the south rose up and took up arms against their own country...the United States of America. Federal troops met you on the battlefield and won the war. The United States won and the Confederacy lost. Allegedly, the United States was then restored to a single country again.

When you lose a war, you don't get to dictate terms to those who bested you. And along with that is the idea that you don't get to honor those who served your cause. Consider had the south won...would you really allow memorials, statues and monuments to Lincoln, Grant, Sherman, and other Federal heroes? No. No, sir you would not.

Now then as a compromise, I would propose the following...It is indeed documented history that General Lee made SIGNIFICANT battlefield achievements while wearing the uniform of the United States Army PRIOR to the Civil War. It is also indeed documented history that he was instrumental in helping restore the United States following the end to hostilities. He traveled far north of Virginia into the Mid-Atlantic and New England states and spoke about the need to rejoin the country.

Therefore, I would fully support an item by item review of all Confederate memorials, monuments and statues. Now...you want a Bobby Lee statue? That's fine...but it ain't gonna be on horseback, sword drawn with strapped pistoles. The statue should be non-militaristic and any verbage should emphasize his role as a statesman. And there are others worth reviewing...

But, you want a Nathan Bedford Forrest statue? No...he was as militant as they come, started the Klan and made no significant non-military contributions.

Finally, no new CSA monuments, memorials, statues, schools, roads or other designations. Only modifications to those in existence.

It does not matter what you want and No One here or alive won or lost..and my ancestors wore Union Blue..

Keep your head..No More of that talk about exhuming and destroying remains and head stones of anyone..If your one and the same.. Terry !! ..LOL..!

DAJAX

When the war started, nearly all Confederate officers were previously officers in the US Army. served honorably (especially in the Mexican Wars in the 1840s), and legally resigned their commissions. They are still due honors for their prior service.

Billy.T.Sherman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You lost, sir. A group of people from the south
> rose up and took up arms against their own
> country...the United States of America. Federal
> troops met you on the battlefield and won the war.
> The United States won and the Confederacy lost.
> Allegedly, the United States was then restored to
> a single country again.
>
> When you lose a war, you don't get to dictate
> terms to those who bested you. And along with that
> is the idea that you don't get to honor those who
> served your cause. Consider had the south
> won...would you really allow memorials, statues
> and monuments to Lincoln, Grant, Sherman, and
> other Federal heroes? No. No, sir you would not.
>
> Now then as a compromise, I would propose the
> following...It is indeed documented history that
> General Lee made SIGNIFICANT battlefield
> achievements while wearing the uniform of the
> United States Army PRIOR to the Civil War. It is
> also indeed documented history that he was
> instrumental in helping restore the United States
> following the end to hostilities. He traveled far
> north of Virginia into the Mid-Atlantic and New
> England states and spoke about the need to rejoin
> the country.
>
> Therefore, I would fully support an item by item
> review of all Confederate memorials, monuments and
> statues. Now...you want a Bobby Lee statue? That's
> fine...but it ain't gonna be on horseback, sword
> drawn with strapped pistoles. The statue should be
> non-militaristic and any verbage should emphasize
> his role as a statesman. And there are others
> worth reviewing...
>
> But, you want a Nathan Bedford Forrest statue?
> No...he was as militant as they come, started the
> Klan and made no significant non-military
> contributions.
>
> Finally, no new CSA monuments, memorials, statues,
> schools, roads or other designations. Only
> modifications to those in existence.


With all due respect Terry, please.


We all know that the North Started the war be invading the South and went burning and pillaging as they went.

The South DID secede and the North's reaction was to invade. Stop peddling mule manure long enough to think it through.

It was a WAR OF NORTHERN AGRESSION, despite the issues which led to it.

The North was the aggressor.

How many times does a child misbehave before they get spanked?

Lincoln told you to let those slaves go or it would go hard for you. He was your President. You not only kept your slaves in defiance of the President, you seceded and then turned on the garrison at Sumter. This is not about who fired the first shot. This is about getting citizens in line with policy.

The southern states were clearly the aggressors by defying policy. You left Lincoln no choice. To paraphrase...

What we had there was failure to communicate. Some men...you just can't reach. So, you get what we had there 150 years ago. Which was the way he wanted it so...he gots it. I don't like it anymore than you men.

CSA.Killah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many times does a child misbehave before they
> get spanked?
>
> Lincoln told you to let those slaves go or it
> would go hard for you. He was your President. You
> not only kept your slaves in defiance of the
> President, you seceded and then turned on the
> garrison at Sumter. This is not about who fired
> the first shot. This is about getting citizens in
> line with policy.
>
> The southern states were clearly the aggressors by
> defying policy. You left Lincoln no choice. To
> paraphrase...
>
> What we had there was failure to communicate. Some
> men...you just can't reach. So, you get what we
> had there 150 years ago. Which was the way he
> wanted it so...he gots it. I don't like it anymore
> than you men.

Have you ever read a history book? I don't think you have.

CSA.Killah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How many times does a child misbehave before they
> get spanked?
>
> Lincoln told you to let those slaves go or it
> would go hard for you. He was your President. You
> not only kept your slaves in defiance of the
> President, you seceded and then turned on the
> garrison at Sumter. This is not about who fired
> the first shot. This is about getting citizens in
> line with policy.
>
> The southern states were clearly the aggressors by
> defying policy. You left Lincoln no choice. To
> paraphrase...
>
> What we had there was failure to communicate. Some
> men...you just can't reach. So, you get what we
> had there 150 years ago. Which was the way he
> wanted it so...he gots it. I don't like it anymore
> than you men.


False.

Secession by seven southern states - February 1861

Battle of Fort Sumter - Apr 12, 1861

Emancipation Proclamation - announced September 22, 1862, effective January 1, 1863.

By law Confederate graves have the same status as Union graves.

Many on both sides were draftees. They didn't chose to take up arms against anyone, they were forced to be there.

Many of the Union victories were won with the great loss of blood by immigrant draftees just off the boat from Ireland and Germany.

Bedford Forrest started the Klan and then quit, telling those who stayed in to give up violence.

Historian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> By law Confederate graves have the same status as
> Union graves.
>
> Many on both sides were draftees. They didn't
> chose to take up arms against anyone, they were
> forced to be there.
>
> Many of the Union victories were won with the
> great loss of blood by immigrant draftees just off
> the boat from Ireland and Germany.
>
> Bedford Forrest started the Klan and then quit,
> telling those who stayed in to give up violence.


Very true. Just like all lower-ranking soldiers, they were there because they were conscripted. Wars are all the same. Rich guys give clothes, food and guns to a bunch of poor schmucks so they can go out and kill the other poor schmucks who were given clothes, food and guns by some other rich guys. They aren't so much fighting for a cause as they are fighting just to stay alive.
Also, the very first soldiers buried at what is today Arlington were rebel soldiers. The federal forces had taken over the Custis-Lee mansion, where Mrs. Lee still resided. The rebel soldiers were buried there right up close to the house by the federals just to piss her off and make her think about what might happen to her husband.

There's yer problem right there Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CSA.Killah Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How many times does a child misbehave before
> they
> > get spanked?
> >
> > Lincoln told you to let those slaves go or it
> > would go hard for you. He was your President.
> You
> > not only kept your slaves in defiance of the
> > President, you seceded and then turned on the
> > garrison at Sumter. This is not about who fired
> > the first shot. This is about getting citizens
> in
> > line with policy.
> >
> > The southern states were clearly the aggressors
> by
> > defying policy. You left Lincoln no choice. To
> > paraphrase...
> >
> > What we had there was failure to communicate.
> Some
> > men...you just can't reach. So, you get what we
> > had there 150 years ago. Which was the way he
> > wanted it so...he gots it. I don't like it
> anymore
> > than you men.
>
>
> False.
>
> Secession by seven southern states - February
> 1861
>
> Battle of Fort Sumter - Apr 12, 1861
>
> Emancipation Proclamation - announced September
> 22, 1862, effective January 1, 1863.

I am aware of the official timeline...

Do you really think the first time Lincoln spoke of freeing slaves was the Emancipation Proclamation? No...he tried to let Davis and his government save face over the matter and appealed to their common sense. There were NUMEROUS communications both front channel and back channel between The White House and both First Capitol in Montgomery, AL and Second Capitol in Richmond, VA. Davis insisted he wouldn't free the slaves and Lincoln then issued the Emancipation Proclamation. You gotta' know there were abolitionist jihadists who wanted to burn every square inch of the south and free the slaves decades before so, Lincoln had his own people calling him soft on slavery and southeners feeling oppressed over his same leadership.

CSA.Killah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's yer problem right there Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > CSA.Killah Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > How many times does a child misbehave before
> > they
> > > get spanked?
> > >
> > > Lincoln told you to let those slaves go or it
> > > would go hard for you. He was your President.
> > You
> > > not only kept your slaves in defiance of the
> > > President, you seceded and then turned on the
> > > garrison at Sumter. This is not about who
> fired
> > > the first shot. This is about getting
> citizens
> > in
> > > line with policy.
> > >
> > > The southern states were clearly the
> aggressors
> > by
> > > defying policy. You left Lincoln no choice.
> To
> > > paraphrase...
> > >
> > > What we had there was failure to communicate.
> > Some
> > > men...you just can't reach. So, you get what
> we
> > > had there 150 years ago. Which was the way he
> > > wanted it so...he gots it. I don't like it
> > anymore
> > > than you men.
> >
> >
> > False.
> >
> > Secession by seven southern states - February
> > 1861
> >
> > Battle of Fort Sumter - Apr 12, 1861
> >
> > Emancipation Proclamation - announced September
> > 22, 1862, effective January 1,
> 1863.
>
> I am aware of the official timeline...
>
> Do you really think the first time Lincoln spoke
> of freeing slaves was the Emancipation
> Proclamation? No...he tried to let Davis and his
> government save face over the matter and appealed
> to their common sense. There were NUMEROUS
> communications both front channel and back channel
> between The White House and both First Capitol in
> Montgomery, AL and Second Capitol in Richmond, VA.
> Davis insisted he wouldn't free the slaves and
> Lincoln then issued the Emancipation Proclamation.
> You gotta' know there were abolitionist jihadists
> who wanted to burn every square inch of the south
> and free the slaves decades before so, Lincoln had
> his own people calling him soft on slavery and
> southeners feeling oppressed over his same
> leadership.


Dude, you're just pulling more shit out of your ass. As you've done here lately over and over.

Despite the now popular version, Lincoln was not an abolitionist. In fact, he was a white supremacist and segregationist who believed that the only real solution to slavery was to recolonize by sending them all back to Africa.

The Emancipation Proclamation was not primarily some noble deed or any declaration to the South as you suggest. It was a practical solution to deal with what today we'd call a refugee crisis resulting from large numbers of blacks fleeing north as the war progressed and not knowing what the fuck else to do with all of them. There was no need for it until the already proceeding war required it. So, not only did you get the timing and ordering wrong, your ordering of events makes no sense in light of actual events.

Although slavery was a significant element, the Civil War did not start as a result of anything having to do with Lincoln warning the south. That's fucking ridiculous.

Nope, it all went down as he said.

"More problematic were Lincoln’s views on race. He held opinions not very different from those of the majority of his racist countrymen. Even if slavery was wrong, “there is a physical difference between the white and black races that will for ever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality.” His solution was a form of ethnic cleansing: shipping blacks off to Liberia, or Haiti, or Central America — anywhere as long as it wasn’t the United States.

Lincoln’s views may have started to change once he saw how bravely black troops fought for the Union cause, but even at the time of his death, he was willing to leave the fate of emancipated slaves in the hands of bigoted state legislators. “Whether Lincoln ever went beyond being an anti-slavery white supremacist,” Fredrickson writes, “is a question that is difficult to resolve.”

https://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/abraham-lincoln-racist/

of course we now know this is rubbish, that there is any significant 'physical difference' between the races. I have no nostalgia for the 1800's ignorance. Some of my relatives were confederates Im sure but they were wrong about their cause.

"The 1890s, when the UDC(Daughters of the Confederation) was founded and monument building began in earnest, was a decade of virulent racism across the South. Not content to disenfranchise black men, Southern whites went on a lynching spree. Ida B. Wells, the African American journalist and anti-lynching crusader, documented 186 lynchings of black people in 1893 alone — mostly men, but women and children, too. As she wrote in her account “The Red Record,” these “scenes of unusual brutality failed to have any visible effect upon the humane sentiments of the people of our land.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/08/16/the-whole-point-of-confederate-monuments-is-to-celebrate-white-supremacy/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.71e753984209

Doctorate.US.History Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nope, it all went down as he said.


No, you're just full of shit.

lol

Sherman, Grant, Sheridan, Custer. All respectable men. We enjoyed being starved. raped and murdered and confined to reservations.

For the most part the (very) few former Confederate soldiers interred at Arlington Cemetery were also U.S. veterans of the Spanish American war so they qualify anyway. OP is, obviously, a troll.

We need to send "you know who" back to the slums.

Signed,
General Curtis LeMay

Dig em up and toss their bones in the trash.

Libtards, do you also feel the same way about Kleagle Robert Byrd, a star of the Democratic Party who was involved in Klan activities most of his life? Where do you suggest Governor Coonman be buried?

You confederate haters are a bunch of ignorant bastards. After the Civil War there was a real chance for guerrilla warfare that could have lasted for decades. Like in many countries that have been through a Civil War. However in the spirit of unity and of coming together as a country (what a concept). The South was accepted by the North as fellow country men. R. E. Lee went a long way to make that happen and the North allowed their Southern countrymen to honor their leaders as a matter of reconciliation so there is a reason behind all of it. Maybe read some history for a change instead of a knee jerk left reaction to everything

What would we then do with all the now empty holes? I have some good ideas. OP sounds like some New York transplant asshole who should really STFU about things he knows little or nothing about.

Of honor or valor in the bodies of the liberals today. They would have been horsewhipped in the days of the Civil War as cowards

Not One Ounce Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of honor or valor in the bodies of the liberals
> today. They would have been horsewhipped in the
> days of the Civil War as cowards


Says the proven coward.

.
Attachments:

I love all these righteous lefties.. dig up the confederates.. traiters..Ug. OP.. you do know they are ALL democrats..all those for slavery .. fought for slavery.. started to Ku Klux Klan voted to not count them as humans.. to not let them be citizens.. to not let them vote.. to stand in schoolhouse doors.. to beat them up on bridges to hose them down the street (including women and children) like parade trash left over.. ALL DEMOCRATS that is why you are making this fuss.. trying to hide your sins.... and just like Lyndon Johnson said.. they will vote Dem for the next 200 years...

https://youtu.be/-mBilft7RiE






Ahead Arbery, sad. If the nigger got shotguned in Gunston he would've been crab food. Got caught stealing.


https://youtu.be/BzUnqr1t7yI
Attachments:

Billy.T.Sherman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I disagree...we don't need to honor those who were
> summarily defeated. I say...dig 'em up, burn the
> remains and destroy the headstones.
>
> This is not about honoring slavers or erasing
> history. This is about discontinuing the practice
> of honoring those who took up arms against the
> United States government...and lost.
>
> What those people did was dishonorable and they
> need not be remembered. Next time? Don't lose the
> fucking war and you can do what you want.





Everyone hates Pakistani males. Just read this link. It proves through Google that Pakistan has the largest amount of google search phrases such as... "sexy child", "sexy children", "sexy boy", child sex, etc.

http://shoebat.org/2016/01/09/google-proves-widespread-muslim-pedophilia-a-shoebat-com-exclusive/

God damn Gerry, you Muslims are some sick mother fuckers.

>Of honor or valor in the bodies of the liberals today. They would have been horsewhipped in the days of the Civil War as cowards

The blue and the grey

https://youtu.be/CFDUwcU4S9k

https://youtu.be/1eNA0RBueoY


https://youtu.be/x4Ze0hn2P90
Attachments:

Those who would be exhumin' are, themselves, ex human.

The north won and forgave the south. It's only today's libtards, desperate for something to be angry about, who can't forgive.

The primary reason we have racial tension today is the 100 year legacy of bigotry and hatred fomented by the democrat party after the civil war. Had it not been for the kkk and jim crow, both inventions of the democrat party, we could have, and would have, healed. But, just as today, the dems needed an issue to use to gain power. Now we live with the legacy of 100 years of hatred and oppression by the dems.

Trump 2020

Make Black America Free

Pretty sure there aren’t shrines and cemeteries all over Iraq and Syria celebrating ISIS...

They're poor, broke, and addicted to meth and opiods, and now you want to take away all historic rememberance of their heros?

That's cruel.

Fuck of Billy Sherman. Fuck off straight back to shit hole New York.piece of fuckin yankee inbred shit.
Attachments:

You probably enjoyed the video of the white veteran getting beaten by the Nig in Michigan. Die Rotten Scum.
Attachments:

Go suck Don Lemons cock. Faggot.
Attachments:

Go take your kids to the drag queen storybook hour. I guess this is the great US government that allows this degenerate shit. Punk.
Attachments:

You probably believe the mainstream media story about the “Jogger” aka fleeing felon in Georgia. Retard.
Attachments:

Rome is burning because of scum like yo.
Attachments:

Your precious US Government did Waco, Ruby Ridge. Trail of tears. Go back North vile cunts
Attachments:

You have no honor sir. Now fuck off back to fucked up Pennsylvania where your state health director is a filthy tranny
Attachments:

Go read your fucking Jew York Times Faggot. Disparaging veterans and military every chance they get.
Attachments:

The wrong side won . Now we reap the consequences with rainbow diversity and unicorns
Attachments:

By your retarded logic, all of the founding fathers were traitors because they rose up against Great Britain. I guess they should be dug up as well.

I know you’re a troll, but... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> By your retarded logic, all of the founding
> fathers were traitors because they rose up against
> Great Britain. I guess they should be dug up as
> well.


They won their war. Confedtards didn’t.

A.P. Hill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You have no honor sir. Now fuck off back to fucked
> up Pennsylvania where your state health director
> is a filthy tranny


Not what Hill would have said. You should have chosen Jackson. Neither were militant secessionists but Jackson's religious zealotry makes him the more likely gay basher.

Braxton Bragg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go read your fucking Jew York Times Faggot.
> Disparaging veterans and military every chance
> they get.

Decent drillmaster but damned poor army commander. He could not get along with anyone and his fights with his subordinates undermined the performance of his army.

Get those loser confederate bodies out of hero's ground!

Dorsey Pender Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The wrong side won . Now we reap the consequences
> with rainbow diversity and unicorns


Died at 29. Not only a loss to the Confederacy but also to his wife and children. To understand why the Civil War remained so strong a memory in the south just think of all the Dorsey Penders who did not come back. Never again would such a large portion of the young male population of this country be so devastated. That is on top of the loss of slavery, the destruction of southern industry and transportation and the evaporation of southern capital. In 1860 the south was wealthy enough to be considered a viable independent nation. In 1870 it had been reduced to an economic colony of the north.

I know you’re a troll, but... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> By your retarded logic, all of the founding
> fathers were traitors because they rose up against
> Great Britain. I guess they should be dug up as
> well.


They were traitors at the time the revolt started. If America had lost the war a number of them would have ended up on the gallows. Could have been worse though. After the 1745 revolt in Scotland a few rebels ended up hung, drawn and quartered. However success absolves treason. Washington, Adams, Franklin, Jefferson, Greene were not traitors because they won. If the Confederates had won then Jefferson Davis, Lee and the rest would not have been traitors either.

Do you want more Wrote:

> the destruction of southern
> industry

What a joke. "Southern industry"....yea, obsolete farm equipment picking cotton.

Anyone buried there more than 100 years ago should be dug up and put into a massive pit. They've run out of room and no one is going to visit people from the civil war, regardless of which side they fought on. Exceptions should be made of famous or notable interred.

The south will rise again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you want more Wrote:
>
> > the destruction of southern
> > industry
>
> What a joke. "Southern industry"....yea, obsolete
> farm equipment picking cotton.


How cute. When you think of Northern Industry during the Civil War you probably envision the steel mills of Pittsburgh at 1900. You probably assume the only thing slaves were doing in the south was picking cotton.

cyc5g Wrote:
> You probably
> assume the only thing slaves were doing in the
> south was picking cotton.

They were doing more than that, that is the only explanation for why one of them is in your family tree.

Gerrymanderer2 (G2, the OP original poster or spammer just above, perhaps both) posts several lies on ffu daily - many think he's a fx co gov worker who is getting paid to do it for false DNC democrat "advertising". He floods ffu with useless posts to bump down major news, demoralize americans. G2 posts fecal matter, mutilated bodies, child porn, foreign drug ads and sneaker ads, tells people to kill themselves and government should seize them and put them on psych pills in prison without a trial - decided by DNC democrats gov workers, promotes kangaroo courthouse trials, gives anti-religious rants, gives satanic ritual rants, posts black males with large dicks on white young females, portends white low birth rate and fall of USA whites, suggestive of food tampering/poisoning to solve the white problem, and anything possible to demoralize any americans on ffu - all of which are fake news he never responds to proofs it is fake. (perhaps g2 is a chinese prisoner or isis member - but definitely knowledgeable of fx co gov from the inside at times). The website operator has told him "not to post or return" (in an existing post by the sysop): not because of a political leaning but for continual illegal and gross spam along with messages that are only to demoralize if not kill others. G2 plays at financial terrorism as well; continually reporting fake and false financial data. G2 fakes emergency pleas to deaden the real response to any real one - like a devil. G2 continually spams FFU - which all users complain of: it is a real DoS attack - the attacks are not just topic bumps but designed to inject key words to kill ffu and google search results. G2 continually promotes drug use, alcoholic experimentation, and tries to convince members to meet hookers using photos from the 1990's (i doubt any that did are not arrested or dead). G2 continually posts racist posts and gay posts egging others to comment - then attacks who does - AND RECORDS IT (likely for political extortion). G2 and dems MONITOR AND RECORD* "conservatives who blast out these democrat lies and illegal abuse of telephone privilege (sometimes in a raw manner, being so jaded by the job)" (users who object to G2's actions listed so far). One ffu member discovered a south american country recording FFU databasing all posts in a non-chat database format - and when questioned - another member quickly said it was all coincidence and that this was done everywhere in the world on all sites: WHICH IS A LIE. Not all countries record the every word of what fairfaxians say on blogs. Extortion is also mentioned by G2. And the idea he's fishing for comments he can use against anyone who'd run for office is "just assume he's in that business" - and i've warned others that is what he fishes for - excuses to attack conservatives and or to extort them.

SOME POSTERS ON FFU FEEL G2 IS A JOKER: I ASSURE YOU THE ABOVE COMPLAINTS ARE GENUINELY A THREAT TO ONLOOKERS (THE UN-INTIATED), NON-DEMOCRATS, AND TO ANYONE STATING THAT LAWS SHOULD BE IMPOSED ON DEMOCRATS EQUALLY AS DEMOCRATS IMPOSE THEM ON OTHERS: MONEY

LEGAL NOTICE: DEMOCRATS HAVE `SWATTED' THE HOMES OF SOME FFU POSTS WHO REFUTE G2 AND CALL DEMS OUT ON THEFT AND LIES - AND EXPOSE THE LAWS THEY COULD BE PROSECUTED FOR BREACH OF TRUST. THAT'S A CONFIRMED WITNESSED FACT. IT IS NO JOKE WHAT G2 IS DOING. HIS CONTINUAL FISHING IS NOT IDLE - THEY ARE TRIGGERED AND ARMED. which i've warned others about since, about 2010 - that G2 is fishing for men to "erase" politically, by any means available to him


G2 has now been wimpering that anti-G2 posts are "unfair" and that users who protest G2 should be blocked, SWATTED (see above), and forced on medications (see above), and that "someone else is G2". However - do not let the vicious foreign attacker fool you into your death our out of your community: G2 has been active since exactly the beginning of 2017 "hillary has already won the election" set of lies and has only DOUBLED spam recently - yes the suicide taunting of others, false information, and all else listed above. He is not wimpering for help he has doubled the spam and vicious attacks (or they, communist/facist using federal money. I pinned him correctly when I began this warning post.

GO BACK TO HELL G2. YOU ARE EXPOSED.