Jim Moran In Ethics Probe
Posted by:
Santa Claus
()
Date: October 30, 2009 12:01PM
Ethics list heavy on defense spenders
By: Jonathan Allen
October 30, 2009 11:00 AM EST
Seven members of the powerful House panel that handles the Pentagon's purse — and the lucrative earmarks inside — have been under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, according to an internal ethics committee document obtained by The Washington Post.
The list includes the names of the five most senior defense appropriators from the majority Democratic side — Reps. John Murtha, Norm Dicks, Peter Visclosky, Jim Moran and Marcy Kaptur — as well as the ranking Republican on the committee, Bill Young of Florida, and Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), who is in the midst of a tough primary battle for the Senate seat being left open by retiring Sen. Sam Brownback.
Murtha, Dicks, Visclosky and Moran all have strong ties to a defunct lobbying firm, the PMA Group, whose founder, former appropriations aide Paul Magliocchetti, is being investigated by the FBI over questions of whether he used "straw donors" to exceed campaign-giving limits. He and nine members of his family, including a minor-league baseball ticket-seller, a Fairfax County cop and a Fairfax County schoolteacher, poured $1.5 million into congressional campaigns between 2000 and 2008, according to a CQ study of campaign finance, property and marriage records that was published in March.
Because the Pentagon's budget is so big and the financial stakes are so high — for the companies, universities and nonprofit organizations that seek earmarks; the lobbyist-fundraisers who act as liaisons to Congress for a small slice of the action; and the lawmakers who need contributions from both sources to fund their own campaigns and help colleagues — defense appropriators make an attractive target for investigators.
So far, Visclosky is the only member of the subcommittee to receive a federal subpoena, but the names of Murtha, Moran and Dicks have surfaced in news reports about the PMA investigation. The lobbying firm specialized in using its relationships with defense appropriators — several of its employees had worked for members of the subcommittee — to secure earmarks for its clients.
The scope of the lobbying firm's success in earmarking money for clients was breathtaking. In the fiscal 2008 defense appropriations bill alone, PMA clients received $300 million in earmarks, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Visclosky got $219,000 in PMA contributions between 2001 and 2008, and he was credited with securing $23.8 million for the company's clients in the 2008 bill. Murtha got $143,600 in campaign money and earmarked $34.1 million for PMA clients. Moran got $125,250 and earmarked $10.8 million. Dicks took in $91,600 and earmarked $12.1 million.
Many of the other top earmarkers for PMA clients — and recipients of its campaign cash — sit in a cluster around Murtha in the southeast corner of the House chamber.
Kaptur, Young and Tiahrt do not have obvious connections to PMA that Murtha, Moran, Visclosky and Dicks do, suggesting that the ethics committee may have seen red flags in activity beyond the lobbying group at the center of the federal investigation — although the committee’s chairs have also cautioned against reading too much into the leaked document.
Efforts by Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) to force an ethics investigation of the relationship between earmarks and campaign contributions were thwarted by House Democrats several times this year.
But Democrats said a nonbinding referral of a Democratic-written resolution to the ethics committee on the matter would serve as a signal from the House to the panel that it should look into the PMA matter. The referral of the resolution, sponsored by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, gave nervous Democrats the ability to say they had voted to refer the matter to the ethics committee — even though the panel was under no obligation to act.
Now, it appears, at least an embryonic-level inquiry was undertaken.