If they are going to lie to me in this way, I am telling Karen Garza that I am NEVER ever buying my child ONE MORE FCPS SCHOOL LUNCH!

Apparently, they are openly lying to parents about cost of school lunch versus lunch from home and the "health benefits" of school lunch.

http://www.resistancemedia.org/2016/07/fcps-deceiving-parents-about-school.html

We also sprinkle in hormones to turn your kid into a tranny fag.

Lunch lady Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We also sprinkle in hormones to turn your kid into
> a tranny fag.

Really? Who gives a shit. Pack your kid lunch - it's really not that hard. And did you honestly believe the lunches were that healthy???

Oakton Mom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If they are going to lie to me in this way, I am
> telling Karen Garza that I am NEVER ever buying my
> child ONE MORE FCPS SCHOOL LUNCH!
>
> Apparently, they are openly lying to parents about
> cost of school lunch versus lunch from home and
> the "health benefits" of school lunch.
>
> http://www.resistancemedia.org/2016/07/fcps-deceiv
> ing-parents-about-school.html


How dare you believe that you know what is best for your child! Michelle Obama and her devoted disciples on the School Board know what is best and for your child and they will be making the decisions for you in the future.

Wow...you're just figuring this out now, OP? Hell, I went to kindergarten in FCPS in 1977. After hearing about my lunch after the 1st day of school, Mom Bruin insisted I brown bag for the next 12 years.

If you think that's the only lie you're being told by FCPS, have a seat and take a sedative.

The aggravating thing to me is that they are poking their noses into kids' homemade lunches in order to make these comparisons.

It is fine to tout the nutritious wonders of the school lunches. But I don't want to hear how much better the cafeteria food is than the lunches we pack at home.

In other words, buy your kid's lunch to help us subsidize all the free ones.

"First of all, the elitists at FCPS apparently believe that a nutritionist degree is necessary to plan a child's school lunch. That claim is absolutely ridiculous."

jeez, hire a professional trained in nutrition to plan meals - what a crime. Maybe we should have hired Aunt Bee to chief up some bologna and mayo on white bread for the kids.

The anti-intellectuals sure love a conspiracy theory about how smart people are out to get them...

On November 22, 1989, Frances Elizabeth Bavier (Aunt Bee) was admitted to Chatham Hospital. She suffered from both heart disease and cancer and was kept in the coronary care unit for two weeks. She was discharged on December 4, 1989, and died at her home two days later on December 6 of a heart attack, at age 86, 8 days before her 87th birthday. Upon her death, whoever went in the non-curtained house found it reeking of cats. The plaster was peeling, the carpets frayed, and the upholstery worn. She had 14 cats, and their litter box was the basement shower.

My kids pick out their own oscar meyer lunchables at Giant every weekend. They get lunchable and a can of RC cola for lunch every single day. That is good enough for any kid.

"Compared to children with a school lunch, children with a lunch brought from home were significantly less likely to have fruits (75.9% vs. 45.3%), vegetables (29.1% vs. 13.2%), and dairy (70.0% vs. 41.8%) (p < 0.001). Children with a lunch from home were more likely to have snacks high in sugar and/or fat (17.5% vs. 60.0%) and non 100% fruit juice/fruit drink (0.3% vs. 47.2%) (p < 0.001) than children with a school lunch."

-- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867076

Mom does NOT know best. And ResistanceMedia.org is a group of useless right-wing hacks and airheads.

PDM4j Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Compared to children with a school lunch,
> children with a lunch brought from home were
> significantly less likely to have fruits (75.9%
> vs. 45.3%), vegetables (29.1% vs. 13.2%), and
> dairy (70.0% vs. 41.8%) (p < 0.001). Children with
> a lunch from home were more likely to have snacks
> high in sugar and/or fat (17.5% vs. 60.0%) and non
> 100% fruit juice/fruit drink (0.3% vs. 47.2%) (p <
> 0.001) than children with a school lunch."
>
> -- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867076
>
> Mom does NOT know best. And ResistanceMedia.org
> is a group of useless right-wing hacks and
> airheads.

Elitist troll, as I explained...


"FCPS misrepresents reality by claiming that the statistics gathered in a study (which may not even exist -- FCPS did not provide a citation) allow them to give individual parents advice to buy a school lunch. Statistics refer to a general population, not to specific individuals. Even if the claim that lunches from home are, ON AVERAGE, less nutritious, is true, it does not follow that the solution is to buy a school lunch. There could be other solutions that parents could implement."

ResistanceMedia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PDM4j Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "Compared to children with a school lunch,
> > children with a lunch brought from home were
> > significantly less likely to have fruits (75.9%
> > vs. 45.3%), vegetables (29.1% vs. 13.2%), and
> > dairy (70.0% vs. 41.8%) (p < 0.001). Children
> with
> > a lunch from home were more likely to have
> snacks
> > high in sugar and/or fat (17.5% vs. 60.0%) and
> non
> > 100% fruit juice/fruit drink (0.3% vs. 47.2%) (p
> <
> > 0.001) than children with a school lunch."
> >
> > -- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867076
> >
> > Mom does NOT know best. And
> ResistanceMedia.org
> > is a group of useless right-wing hacks and
> > airheads.
>
> Elitist troll, as I explained...
>
>
> "FCPS misrepresents reality by claiming that the
> statistics gathered in a study (which may not even
> exist -- FCPS did not provide a citation) allow
> them to give individual parents advice to buy a
> school lunch. Statistics refer to a general
> population, not to specific individuals. Even if
> the claim that lunches from home are, ON AVERAGE,
> less nutritious, is true, it does not follow that
> the solution is to buy a school lunch. There could
> be other solutions that parents could implement."


Thanks Oakton Mom for the publicity!

ResistanceMedia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Elitist troll, as I explained...

LOL! Go fuck yourself, you worthless dumbshit. The plain and simple facts are that school lunches are apt to be markedly healthier than what brown-bag students end up eating. The study that -- like some worthless asshat fucktard -- you suggested might not even exist, was linked to above. It not only exists and is from a highly reputable source, but its results offer clear confirmation of the fact that you and your stooge-fuck group of collected uneducated pinheads are nothing but worthless pieces of shit. Get lost, numb-nuts.

PDM4j Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ResistanceMedia Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Elitist troll, as I explained...
>
> LOL! Go fuck yourself, you worthless dumbshit.
> The plain and simple facts are that school lunches
> are apt to be markedly healthier than what
> brown-bag students end up eating. The study that
> -- like some worthless asshat fucktard -- you
> suggested might not even exist, was linked to
> above. It not only exists and is from a highly
> reputable source, but its results offer clear
> confirmation of the fact that you and your
> stooge-fuck group of collected uneducated pinheads
> are nothing but worthless pieces of shit. Get
> lost, numb-nuts.

AS THE OP SAID -- STUDIES PROVIDE GENERAL, NOT SPECIFIC, INFORMATION.

XxtWL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PDM4j Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ResistanceMedia Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Elitist troll, as I explained...
> >
> > LOL! Go fuck yourself, you worthless dumbshit.
>
> > The plain and simple facts are that school
> lunches
> > are apt to be markedly healthier than what
> > brown-bag students end up eating. The study
> that
> > -- like some worthless asshat fucktard -- you
> > suggested might not even exist, was linked to
> > above. It not only exists and is from a highly
> > reputable source, but its results offer clear
> > confirmation of the fact that you and your
> > stooge-fuck group of collected uneducated
> pinheads
> > are nothing but worthless pieces of shit. Get
> > lost, numb-nuts.
>
> AS THE OP SAID -- STUDIES PROVIDE GENERAL, NOT
> SPECIFIC, INFORMATION.

You're banned.

Some 15 years ago I was a lunch volunteer at an FCPS elementary school. Four things I took away from that experience.

Some children eat lunch at 10 am for scheduling reasons.

The parents of kids who receive free lunches drive nicer cars than me.

The children are required to purchase an entire meal, whether they want it or not. Half of that goes in the trash.

The parent volunteers started a trading table where the children who did not want parts of their lunch could leave items and others could take them. Milk and fruit were popular leftovers, but also occasional desserts. After the last lunch lunch we would take some of the leftovers down to the teacher's lounge and put them in the refrigerator for them. One day, someone from the main office came to us and said what we were doing was against Federal Law. That was the end of the trading table.

True story from the past Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Some 15 years ago I was a lunch volunteer at an
> FCPS elementary school. Four things I took away
> from that experience.
>
> Some children eat lunch at 10 am for scheduling
> reasons.
>
> The parents of kids who receive free lunches drive
> nicer cars than me.
>
> The children are required to purchase an entire
> meal, whether they want it or not. Half of that
> goes in the trash.
>
> The parent volunteers started a trading table
> where the children who did not want parts of their
> lunch could leave items and others could take
> them. Milk and fruit were popular leftovers, but
> also occasional desserts. After the last lunch
> lunch we would take some of the leftovers down to
> the teacher's lounge and put them in the
> refrigerator for them. One day, someone from the
> main office came to us and said what we were doing
> was against Federal Law. That was the end of the
> trading table.

I love these stories. I believe every single one. I liked the trading table. And I can see why it is a violation of Federal Law. You can't take government subsidized lunches and give them to the teachers, for sure. It is a shame to throw it all out. What they were doing makes a lot of sense. But, no can do.

I hate to throw stuff out.....

Cary1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're banned.

And you're a pathetic asshole who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about. Resistance Media. Hahahaha! What a crock-of-shit fucking toadie!

I need government daycare for my kids. I'm too lazy to make them lunch, unfit to teach them about life, and don't care enough to indoctrinate them with my own views.

I'll let FCPS profit from my lazyness, so that they can spend my money on more administrative position while kids languish in old trailers.

Kids in the "old trailers" will learn to spell "laziness" properly. Thank you, FCPS.

What does this have to do with bathrooms?

jEdb4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kids in the "old trailers" will learn to spell
> "laziness" properly. Thank you, FCPS.


I c you thought my post was unintellgble. What midwit a

Unintelligible, unintelligent...it's all par for the course among nitwits. Actual studies by reputable and reliable investigators have shown that school lunches tend to be be more healthful (by rather a lot) than brown-bag lunches brought from home. Stupid-ass claims that FCPS is lying to parents by citing such studies are examples of just how pathetically ignorant right-wing dummies really can be.

The money will be used for more breakfast, lunch and dinner meetings by FCPS administrators and the school board.

Just forget about anything being done for the kids. For that, they will pressure the Board of Supervisors.

http://www.foodandnutrition.org/FNCE-2015/Penny-McConnell/

In all this figuring, was it figured in whether the kids buying are actually eating? I understand the lunches suck.

You don't understand shit, you pathetic dumbass. The menus are tested by students before they are rolled out. If a proposed meal doesn't rate highly enough, it never makes it onto the line. Now, why not just go fuck yourself.

Ancient.Bruin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow...you're just figuring this out now, OP? Hell,
> I went to kindergarten in FCPS in 1977. After
> hearing about my lunch after the 1st day of
> school, Mom Bruin insisted I brown bag for the
> next 12 years.


Can we then all assume you dropped out after 11th grade?

DVEEN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You don't understand shit, you pathetic dumbass.
> The menus are tested by students before they are
> rolled out. If a proposed meal doesn't rate
> highly enough, it never makes it onto the line.
> Now, why not just go fuck yourself.


FCPS does not test food on students. Can you imagine the uproar if something went wrong?

We really need to take these kids away from their parents so we can raise them properly for the benefit of the state. Especially the black ones. We can cull any who don't make the cut.

Why would you have done so in the first place? School lunches everywhere, especially in Fairfax, are so loaded down with simple sugars and cheap carbs that are meant to keep kids so docile and submissive, that they'll accept every part of the gay and globalist agendas being forced down their throats every single day of their lives.

Wrong Again Idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FCPS does not test food on students. Can you
> imagine the uproar if something went wrong?

It's a difficult thing realizing that people as assfuck stupid as you are allowed to walk around loose. FCPS Food and Nutrition Services employs more tha 1,300 people. Meals are planned by registered dietitians to reflect the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Student preferences are determined at student tasting parties. Menus that don't pass muster are rejected, FCPS serves affordable, tasy, nutritious meals to more than 140,000 customers every day. You can go eat shit now, asshole.

Now, yaw'l just simmer down yaw'l now ya hear.

I personally taste test each food item. I admit the lunch room ladies are creepy, but come on now honey, suga.

I do need to slow down a bit on those cod nuggets. I'm starting to lose my school girl figure.

Best, Karen

Hmmmmm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ancient.Bruin Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wow...you're just figuring this out now, OP?
> Hell,
> > I went to kindergarten in FCPS in 1977. After
> > hearing about my lunch after the 1st day of
> > school, Mom Bruin insisted I brown bag for the
> > next 12 years.
>
>
> Can we then all assume you dropped out after 11th
> grade?

No. No you may not assume that. I earned my amnesty a year early the old-fashioned way...

I took summer school, AP classes and classes at GMU. After finishing 11th grade, I was informed I had acquired the necessary credits for graduation and I was and I quote..."free to go".

Nice try, though...

unfit parent Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I need government daycare for my kids. I'm too
> lazy to make them lunch, unfit to teach them about
> life, and don't care enough to indoctrinate them
> with my own views.
>
> I'll let FCPS profit from my lazyness, so that
> they can spend my money on more administrative
> position while kids languish in old trailers.

Nail on the head right here. And to the people that believe that school lunches are better for the kids then what they can pack in look at it like this. If the food the schools are serving is not palatable then the nutritional value doesn't mean squat. IF the kids don't / won't eat it why waste the money. Besides mom and dad just give them bologna and cheese sandwiches as 90% of the little thugs will end up in jail anyway you will just be preparing them for their futures.

I can tell you, the school lunches are not healthy what-so-ever. Most kids order in the pizza line (Yes, we have lunch lines that just serve pizza) and the ones that don't order in the pizza line order a bunch of fried and LDL ridden food in the regular lines... everything is so over-salted,a lot of processed foods. Also, almost everyone that buys a lunch is forced to buy a side vegetables but never really eats them and they go right into the trash. I would always pick a pack lunch over the fcps garbage --- also, I've noticed that a lot of the food that is served is expired..

>The anti-intellectuals sure love a conspiracy theory about how smart people are out to get them...

Out to get us yes, but no one claimed they are smart

Boo Hoo. I went from K-12 here in FFX from '89-93 and the food always sucked. "100% beef burgers" we would pull soy beans from. Gross. Previous poster was right, pack 'em a lunch.