Hillary is no friend of children. She defended child molester.


https://www.google.com/search?q=Hillary+Clinton+defended+child+molester&oq=hi&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59j69i61l3.3859j0j4&client=ms-android-verizon&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Doesn't 'Law and Order' include legal representation in a court of law?

Conserva-tards!

LoLz!

L6eFN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hillary Clinton No Friend Of Childten

What/who is "childten"?

She was requested to take this case in 1975 and reluctantly did so. The prosecution had mismanaged evidence (that's a big no-no), and to Clinton's astonishment, the defendant had passed a polygraph. The case ended in a plea agreement for one year in jail and four years of probation. The prosecution and judge of course signed off on that agreement.

Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doesn't 'Law and Order' include legal
> representation in a court of law?

Sure does. However, I don't want a President who bragged about getting a child rapist a reduced sentence due to a legal technicality. She may have done well by her client, but it is not an event to be bragging about. It shows very little empathy for the child who was raped.

she's a scumbag Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It shows very little empathy for the
> child who was raped.

The law doesn't take empathy into account.

Hillary proved herself to be a highly skilled, capable attorney at trial.

I am proud that a woman of such stellar talent will be our 45th POTUS.

Law & Order Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> she's a scumbag Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It shows very little empathy for the
> > child who was raped.
>
> The law doesn't take empathy into account.

Who said it did?

> Hillary proved herself to be a highly skilled,
> capable attorney at trial.

Yes, one who bragged about her ability to successfully defend a child rapist.

She's running for President, not Public Defender.

> I am proud that a woman of such stellar talent
> will be our 45th POTUS.

You aren't proud of shit. You're simply a trained seal arfing at the sardines being shoved down your throat.

you missed the boat Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Law & Order Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > she's a scumbag Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It shows very little empathy for the
> > > child who was raped.
> >
> > The law doesn't take empathy into account.
>
> Who said it did?
>
> > Hillary proved herself to be a highly skilled,
> > capable attorney at trial.
>
> Yes, one who bragged about her ability to
> successfully defend a child rapist.
>
> She's running for President, not Public Defender.
>
> > I am proud that a woman of such stellar talent
> > will be our 45th POTUS.
>
> You aren't proud of shit. You're simply a trained
> seal arfing at the sardines being shoved down your
> throat.

Attachments:

she's a scumbag Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conserva-tards! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Doesn't 'Law and Order' include legal
> > representation in a court of law?
>
> Sure does. However, I don't want a President who
> bragged about getting a child rapist a reduced
> sentence due to a legal technicality. She may
> have done well by her client, but it is not an
> event to be bragging about. It shows very little
> empathy for the child who was raped.


Would you like her better if she was a bankruptcy attorney?
Trump loves them.
And were are those tax returns?

Small hands Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> she's a scumbag Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Conserva-tards! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Doesn't 'Law and Order' include legal
> > > representation in a court of law?
> >
> > Sure does. However, I don't want a President
> who
> > bragged about getting a child rapist a reduced
> > sentence due to a legal technicality. She may
> > have done well by her client, but it is not an
> > event to be bragging about. It shows very
> little
> > empathy for the child who was raped.
>
>
> Would you like her better if she was a bankruptcy
> attorney?

You've missed the point again. It isn't the fact that she was a criminal defense attorney that defended child rapists. It is the fact that she bragged and laughed about defending a child rapist on a technicality.

> Trump loves them.

Really?

> And were are those tax returns?

Who cares? Or, should I ask, what difference does it make?

Law & Order Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>


Why would I be angry? Your stupidity is actually funny!

If only we had an evenhanded upstanding lawyer like Ted Cruz running.

Quote

In 1997, Michael Wayne Haley was arrested after stealing a calculator from Walmart. This was a crime that merited a maximum two-year prison term. But prosecutors incorrectly applied a habitual offender law. Neither the judge nor the defense lawyer caught the error and Haley was sentenced to 16 years.

Eventually, the mistake came to light and Haley tried to fix it. Ted Cruz was solicitor general of Texas at the time. Instead of just letting Haley go for time served, Cruz took the case to the Supreme Court to keep Haley in prison for the full 16 years.

Some justices were skeptical. “Is there some rule that you can’t confess error in your state?” Justice Anthony Kennedy asked. The court system did finally let Haley out of prison, after six years.

The case reveals something interesting about Cruz’s character.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brutalism-of-ted-cruz.html?_r=0

This was written by a republican.

blackstone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If only we had an evenhanded upstanding lawyer
> like Ted Cruz running.
>
>

Quote

In 1997, Michael Wayne Haley was arrested
> after stealing a calculator from Walmart. This was
> a crime that merited a maximum two-year prison
> term. But prosecutors incorrectly applied a
> habitual offender law. Neither the judge nor the
> defense lawyer caught the error and Haley was
> sentenced to 16 years.
>
> Eventually, the mistake came to light and Haley
> tried to fix it. Ted Cruz was solicitor general of
> Texas at the time. Instead of just letting Haley
> go for time served, Cruz took the case to the
> Supreme Court to keep Haley in prison for the full
> 16 years.
>
> Some justices were skeptical. “Is there some
> rule that you can’t confess error in your
> state?” Justice Anthony Kennedy asked. The court
> system did finally let Haley out of prison, after
> six years.
>
> The case reveals something interesting about
> Cruz’s character.

> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brut
> alism-of-ted-cruz.html?_r=0
>
> This was written by a republican.

Satan id my middle name.

she's a scumbag Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You've missed the point again. It isn't the fact
> that she was a criminal defense attorney that
> defended child rapists. It is the fact that she
> bragged and laughed about defending a child rapist
> on a technicality.

Quote

WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer Hillary Rodham was appointed to represent a defendant charged with raping a 12-year-old girl. Clinton reluctantly took on the case, which ended with a plea bargain for the defendant.

WHAT'S FALSE: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about the the case's outcome, she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and she did not "free" the defendant.

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/

roger ailes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> she's a scumbag Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You've missed the point again. It isn't the
> fact
> > that she was a criminal defense attorney that
> > defended child rapists. It is the fact that
> she
> > bragged and laughed about defending a child
> rapist
> > on a technicality.
>
>

Quote

WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer
> Hillary Rodham was appointed to represent a
> defendant charged with raping a 12-year-old girl.
> Clinton reluctantly took on the case, which ended
> with a plea bargain for the defendant.
>
> WHAT'S FALSE: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to
> be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh about
> the the case's outcome, she did not assert that
> the complainant "made up the rape story," she did
> not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty, and
> she did not "free" the defendant.

> http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-
> rapist-laughed-about-it/


Judge for yourself.

Listen around 1:50 and 2:50 and 4:55 for the laughter. Listen to the rest to hear her brag. She even knows he was guilty. She admits it.

let's go to the tape Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> roger ailes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > she's a scumbag Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You've missed the point again. It isn't the
> > fact
> > > that she was a criminal defense attorney that
> > > defended child rapists. It is the fact that
> > she
> > > bragged and laughed about defending a child
> > rapist
> > > on a technicality.
> >
> >

Quote

WHAT'S TRUE: In 1975, young lawyer
> > Hillary Rodham was appointed to represent a
> > defendant charged with raping a 12-year-old
> girl.
> > Clinton reluctantly took on the case, which
> ended
> > with a plea bargain for the defendant.
> >
> > WHAT'S FALSE: Hillary Clinton did not volunteer
> to
> > be the defendant's lawyer, she did not laugh
> about
> > the the case's outcome, she did not assert that
> > the complainant "made up the rape story," she
> did
> > not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty,
> and
> > she did not "free" the defendant.

> >
> http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-
>
> > rapist-laughed-about-it/
>
>
> Judge for yourself.
>
> Listen around 1:50 and 2:50 and 4:55 for the
> laughter. Listen to the rest to hear her brag.
> She even knows he was guilty. She admits it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ

listen to the tapes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Judge for yourself.
> >
> > Listen around 1:50 and 2:50 and 4:55 for the
> > laughter. Listen to the rest to hear her brag.
>
> > She even knows he was guilty. She admits it.

You're missing the boat.

Under the laws, even the guilty entitled to representation.

Attachments:

Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> listen to the tapes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Judge for yourself.
> > >
> > > Listen around 1:50 and 2:50 and 4:55 for the
> > > laughter. Listen to the rest to hear her
> brag.
> >
> > > She even knows he was guilty. She admits it.
>
> You're missing the boat.
>
> Under the laws, even the guilty entitled to
> representation.

Who said they weren't? There is a difference between defending a guilty man and laughing about getting him off.

listen to the tapes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is a difference between defending a guilty
> man and laughing about getting him off.

Nervous laughter, perfectly normal human trait.

Truth B Told Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> listen to the tapes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There is a difference between defending a
> guilty
> > man and laughing about getting him off.
>
> Nervous laughter, perfectly normal human trait.

So she can't remain composed when talking about her career? Yeah, that's the person I want with the nuclear codes.

The Clintons' ties to Saudi Arabia are inexcusable. Concerned about the proliferation of Islamic schools, mosques and students from Arab countries? Thank Bill and Hillary.

listen to the tapes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > listen to the tapes Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > > Judge for yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Listen around 1:50 and 2:50 and 4:55 for
> the
> > > > laughter. Listen to the rest to hear her
> > brag.
> > >
> > > > She even knows he was guilty. She admits
> it.
> >
> > You're missing the boat.
> >
> > Under the laws, even the guilty entitled to
> > representation.
>
> Who said they weren't? There is a difference
> between defending a guilty man and laughing about
> getting him off.

Very poor judgment is the point. She did a great job for her client but she should have kept her mouth shut.

Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doesn't 'Law and Order' include legal
> representation in a court of law?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!


Not when you rape kids.

blackstone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If only we had an evenhanded upstanding lawyer
> like Ted Cruz running.
>
>

Quote

In 1997, Michael Wayne Haley was arrested
> after stealing a calculator from Walmart. This was
> a crime that merited a maximum two-year prison
> term. But prosecutors incorrectly applied a
> habitual offender law. Neither the judge nor the
> defense lawyer caught the error and Haley was
> sentenced to 16 years.
>
> Eventually, the mistake came to light and Haley
> tried to fix it. Ted Cruz was solicitor general of
> Texas at the time. Instead of just letting Haley
> go for time served, Cruz took the case to the
> Supreme Court to keep Haley in prison for the full
> 16 years.
>
> Some justices were skeptical. “Is there some
> rule that you can’t confess error in your
> state?” Justice Anthony Kennedy asked. The court
> system did finally let Haley out of prison, after
> six years.
>
> The case reveals something interesting about
> Cruz’s character.

> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/opinion/the-brut
> alism-of-ted-cruz.html?_r=0
>
> This was written by a republican.


I know this is hard for most (all) of you leftists to believe, but maybe he shouldn't have fucking stolen a calculator?

I heard on C-SPAN this morning a bunch of morons (because it was all-Democrat morning).

Anyway, one of these idiots gets on and says that Hillary is so smart, but sacrificed her career to help children.

Let me get this straight;

She works for Watergate scandal, and gets fired.

Then she marries and screws a Goober from Hot Springs, Arkansas.

She joins a law firm called Rose Law Firm for 10 years, while her hick husband was governor. She did no work, but was paid millions.

Then, she becomes First Lady. She does nothing in that regard with respect to children. She just launches into full Global Socialism mode.

This including holding secret meetings on how to put doctors in jail if they worked out of her network in her big socialist medicine scheme. Fortunately, the Republicans shot that plan to Hell.

Then, she enables her husband to screw more woman, including one young impressionable girl of 19. He fucked her left and right, up and down. He stuck a cigar up her vagina, and then smoked it.

Anyway, this is what you get with the Clintons.

I'm voting for Trump. Hopefully, he'll shoot Obama's shitty plan straight to Hell, too.