Re: Geno D'Amico
Date: June 16, 2016 04:20PM
Yawn, ho hum. Same lies different day. I find it truly disgusting that you find maligning someone's chararacter to be "fun" let alone "facts." How totally stupid are you? And how immature of you. Hasn't someone told your mommy and daddy to take away your computer yet??? And to resort to foul language again just shows YOUR temper out of control. Here you are, the poor "victim" accusing him of anger issues, among other things. But the only one losing their temper here is you. Such language. Temper, temper, temper. He's the victim here, not you. You're the one with "issues" dear. Also, I do so hate the way one person, the same author of all the mudslinging here (you are so transparent), keeps mentioning how she "just" went on the licensing website and read all the details. "Just." Over and over and over. And she comes up with more inaccuracies and falsehoods each time as if it's some big "aha" moment or the proverbial smoking gun. You pathetic trollop, you can't read. Yes, you've made a bunch of accusations. Accused does not equate to guilt. Women like you that get dumped make up stuff all the time. Cops don't believe it, juries don't believe it and judges most certainly don't believe it. The final Order suspended the license solely for dating a patient AFTER she was no longer a patient. That's the only finding made. The people that serve on the Board and that conduct hearings of this nature are no dummies. They know unsubstantiated lies when they hear it. They know a liar when they see one. Look in the mirror dear, look past the resting bitch face and see yourself for the liar and loser you are. So, the best "aha" moment you have is that he dated a FORMER patient. No sexual misconduct. No inappropriate sexual relations of any kind. And the finding was one patient, ONE, not three. Honestly can't you read?? And if he dated a geriatric patient, YOU GO GIRL!!! If it was a mental patient, I would look to the author of this trash. Can we say "straight jacket?" The rest of the lunacy in your "fun facts" is unfounded and lacking in any evidence. Just because you say it, it doesn't make it true. And if you truly had even a scintilla of concern for his children, you wouldn't be putting this boatload of lies on a public site for all to read. Children read this. They share it. Your false concern for children just shows you up for the poser and liar you are. And, to call that load of idiocy you labeled "fun facts" and deductive reasoning just makes it patently obvious that you've never taken a class in logic. You probably never went to high school let alone college. Give it up, get laid and move on. Really, is he that great a lay that you have to lower yourself to this?