HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: Justice Involved ()
Date: May 16, 2016 01:15PM

“Criminals” is an inherently disparaging term that leads to stigmatization and decreased access to Eugene O’Neill seminars. But don’t we need to retroactively reconfigure how we think of those unfortunate souls who found themselves pursued by harsh enforcers of restrictive behavioral norms?

When you think about it, Jack the Ripper was merely a “cutlery-involved individual” while Jeffrey Dahmer was simply a “unconventional dietary-options-involved individual.”

http://nypost.com/2016/05/14/owellian-administration-brands-criminals-justice-involved-individuals/

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: UtNJC ()
Date: May 16, 2016 02:11PM

Kind of like beyond stupid people today are just called "Republicans"...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: Felons Should Vote Republican ()
Date: May 16, 2016 06:45PM

McAuliffe does a reach-around to give felons the right to vote Democrat.

However, if you look at his "order", you'll see that he does not give them the right to own firearms.

Read it. The last line literally is, "Nothing in this Order restores the right to ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms."

So these felons are just tools of the Democrats. These tools can't own firearms. They are still branded, and are not restored. Except to vote Democrat.

Now, and therefore, any of you felons, who are off probation. Wake up, grow up, vote Republican, and get these Democrat assholes out of our state, and back to New York where McAuliffe came from.

Vote Republican, and get a governor like Bob McDonnell, who routinely allowed felons the right to firearms after their term expired.

Felons, ex-felons, whatever you call yourself: Scrape the Democrat scum off your body and join a real movement of forward-looking Americans. Tell Obama, Sanders, and Clinton to go to Hell.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: Libtardz!!! LoLz!! ()
Date: May 16, 2016 06:51PM

Justice Involved Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “Criminals” is an inherently disparaging term
> that leads to stigmatization and decreased access
> to Eugene O’Neill seminars. But don’t we need
> to retroactively reconfigure how we think of those
> unfortunate souls who found themselves pursued by
> harsh enforcers of restrictive behavioral norms?
>
> When you think about it, Jack the Ripper was
> merely a “cutlery-involved individual” while
> Jeffrey Dahmer was simply a “unconventional
> dietary-options-involved individual.”
>
> http://nypost.com/2016/05/14/owellian-administrati
> on-brands-criminals-justice-involved-individuals/
Attachments:
Loony-left.jpeg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: John Miller ()
Date: May 16, 2016 08:55PM

UtNJC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kind of like beyond stupid people today are just
> called "Republicans"...


It's funny because it's true!
Attachments:
derp_4598030150837191612_n.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: Libtard lunacy ()
Date: May 16, 2016 10:30PM

,
Attachments:
CiNikTQXEAAl4cB.jpeg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: Dog Walker1 ()
Date: May 16, 2016 11:47PM

Justice Involved Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> “Criminals” is an inherently disparaging term
> that leads to stigmatization and decreased access
> to Eugene O’Neill seminars. But don’t we need
> to retroactively reconfigure how we think of those
> unfortunate souls who found themselves pursued by
> harsh enforcers of restrictive behavioral norms?
>
> When you think about it, Jack the Ripper was
> merely a “cutlery-involved individual” while
> Jeffrey Dahmer was simply a “unconventional
> dietary-options-involved individual.”
>
> http://nypost.com/2016/05/14/owellian-administrati
> on-brands-criminals-justice-involved-individuals/

This is continuing the Obama administration effort to redefine the meaning of words so as to confuse people. It's George Orwell's Newspeak from the book 1984 coming to pass for real.

Here are some other examples from Obama's greatest hits on the language:

old terms: illegals, illegal aliens, illegal immigrants

new Obamaspeak expression: undocumented migrants


old term: terrorism

new Obamaspeak expression: man-caused disasters


old term: war

new Obamaspeak expression: overseas contingency operations


Other terms as follows were recently introduced to redefine how people think about crime per Obama administration official here https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2016/05/04/guest-post-justice-dept-to-alter-its-terminology-for-released-convicts-to-ease-reentry/:


old terms: felon, convict, offender

new Obamaspeak epression: person who committed a crime or individual who was incarcerated


HELP COME UP SUGGESTIONS FOR NEW TERMS OR EXPRESSIONS FOR OBAMASPEAK.

Here are my suggestions to replace terms that may stigmatize the perpetrator and, if you're Obama or his minions, you don't want to stigmatize a wrong-doer.


old term: drunk driver

proposed new Obamaspeak expression: motor vehicle operator who had imbibed too much adult beverage


old term: rapist

proposed new Obamaspeak expression: carnal knowledge acquirer lacking consent


I'm sure you can do better than my suggestions. If the term is related to criminal justice, make sure your proposed new expression obscures what actually occurred or a person's culpability.

newspeak2.jpg

==========
==========

It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. - John Cassis on manners

Ignoring juvenile attacks and remarks on the internet for over two decades.

Arguing by deflection or name-calling is an admission that you don't have a rational argument.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Democrats: No more CRIMINALS, they are now “justice-involved individuals.”
Posted by: djuXE ()
Date: May 18, 2016 08:44AM

djuXE

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **   ******   **    **  **     **  ******** 
  **  **   **    **  **   **   **     **  **       
   ****    **        **  **    **     **  **       
    **     **        *****     *********  ******   
    **     **        **  **    **     **  **       
    **     **    **  **   **   **     **  **       
    **      ******   **    **  **     **  ******** 
This forum powered by Phorum.