846358 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dear Dog Walker1-
>
> Your dog is adorable.
>
> I was also charged from the rear by a strange dog
> while walking in the neighborhood. Scared the crap
> out of me. I thought I was going to have to grab a
> branch or throw rocks at the beast.
>
> Blaming others for personal irresponsibility is
> the way of the world any more.
>
> It is all your fault.
>
> Who do these people think they are?
Thanks. Below are a couple more photos of my dog. When she was young she loved to get on the rail of the deck (like a cat) and walk along the top of the rail looking down for squirrels, chipmunks, or similar critters that would dare invade her back yard. Other photo shows her being chased by a buddy at a dog park, again one of her favorite activities as a young dog.
The strange dog that charged you from behind probably caused you to have a primal fear response.
My first run-in with one of the neighbors’ dogs was likewise terrifying.
Walking my dog on a leash as always, I was using a headlamp to see through the dark as it was about 8 at night. I heard the sound of a large animal running at a high rate of speed. Turning my head to the source of the sound, I initially saw a large black animal with large teeth. For a second or two, I thought it was a wild animal, maybe a bear. As I got my light on the animal, I saw that it was a black dog running at me from the neighbors’ yard.
As the dog ran into the street, I was yelling, “no, no, no!” I could hear a woman calling the dog back and the voice seemed to be coming from the neighbors’ yard. The dog turned back towards the neighbors’ yard when he had reached about 20 feet from me.
[It was reminiscent of an event when I was a kid in rural coastal California. Friend and I were hiking in a field when a wild boar started chasing us. We ducked through a barbed wire fence, and also climbed a small tree in case the boar, at least 200 lbs of mean, crashed through the fence. That type of event creates a primal fear response.]
Would you believe that the woman is a federal administrative official? I don’t want to specify which dept/agency and I can’t really determine how high up she is, probably moderately high up. I will say that the dept/agency is sufficiently important that you would wonder how someone like her could pass vetting and work there. I’m pretty sure that she worked for TSA at the time of the various incidents that I described, but she has apparently moved up into a new bureaucracy since then.
Husband apparently was a big man on campus, 30 years ago. In what is likely (IMHO) a textbook case of overcompensation, he now has “BIG” along with some initials on his license plate.
Conversations with the couple were hilarious (in retrospect, after danger from husband and dogs had passed) and often surreal. The woman evades responsibility like a 13 year old teenager.
As my wife, dog, and I hurried home after the pepper gel incident, the wife sobbed like a teenager "you sprayed our family pets, you're a bully." [I wanted to say "your dogs menaced my family pet," but it's hard to argue with a delusional person. I just keep saying "keep your dogs on leashes when off your property" and "I have a right to defend my wife, myself, and my dog."]
She also said, "just you wait, [my first & last names] 'til your dog gets loose."
(This was absurd b/c her dogs did not get loose. She set them loose.)
Husband chimed in, his voice dripping with hate, "I can't wait! I can't wait 'til your dog gets loose." (So, what? They would torture my dog if she had gotten loose, even though she would have posed no threat to them or their big dogs? That seemed to be the implication.)
Woman, federal official, shouts at me "You better watch yourself [my first & last names] when you're around our property!"
Since my house is on a cul-de-sac and the dog owners' house is where my street joins the only exit street, I have to drive or walk past the dog owners' house whenever I leave my home.
A few days after the dog charged me in that very first incident with no pepper used, and after she and her husband had ignored polite emails asking about the dog, I first asked her in person if it was her dog that charged me, she said that she didn’t know, while displaying various obvious mannerisms of deception.
“Well, do your dogs spend a lot of time out and about in the neighborhood?” I asked.
“Yes.” She said. “Well, why is that? I mean what do they do, open the doors?” I asked.
“Yes, they can open the doors,” she said, laughing. She might as well have said, “I can’t be responsible to control my dogs b/c they can open doors.” After that conversation, I retrieved the pepper spray that my wife refused to carry after I bought it for her years earlier.
I get it, I really do. In the minds of this couple, they and their dogs can do no wrong.
There was an incident a few years where a woman was angrily denouncing the guy who shot her brother to death. It seemed that her brother was with 2 other armed men who went into a bar at night. The 3 armed robbers pointed guns at the patrons and employees and demanded that the people get on the ground. One patron, who had a concealed carry permit and a hidden gun, did not get on the ground. Instead, he waited for the robbers to walk past him, whereupon that patron pulled out his gun and shot the woman’s brother to death. The other two robbers fled in fear.
She said, “He was a good brother and a good person. He just wanted money. He wouldn’t have shot anybody. He never hurt anybody in his life. That man should have warned my brother first. He had no right to shoot him.” [I’m paraphrasing all that. Police investigation cleared the shooter as justifiably shooting in defense of self and others.]
In the mind of that woman, her brother could do no wrong. The justifiably- killed armed robber and his family are the victims, to this woman.
I am not making that up.
Whether it’s on the news, Cops TV show with real criminals, or crime TV shows or movies, criminals or their relatives will often find a way to justify illegal actions. “I had to kill him b/c he humiliated me about my bad picks in the NCAA brackets” or similar nonsense, says the criminal. "I had no choice, don't you see?"
Now, I’m not saying that setting big, poorly-socialized, menacing dogs loose is on a par with armed robbery. I’m just saying that the dog owner couple love their dogs like the woman loved her brother. They can’t imagine a scenario where they or their dogs are responsible for unfortunate results of their actions. And the woman can’t accept that her armed robber-brother threw his life away and caused his own death by pointing guns to rob people.
Clearly the dog owners were the authors of their own misfortune. Yet, in their minds, they and their dogs are the victims of a mean neighbor, that would be me.
==========
==========
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. - John Cassis on manners
Ignoring juvenile attacks and remarks on the internet for over two decades.
Arguing by deflection or name-calling is an admission that you don't have a rational argument.
Attachments: