HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Pages: PreviousFirst...1112131415161718192021...LastNext
Current Page: 16 of 28
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Steve not k nor 2 ()
Date: September 18, 2016 10:40AM

I kind of did that in the rush so my mistake. I suppose they could always make a come back, I'll place them in the 4-7 mix and have Annandale at 8.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: State champs ()
Date: September 18, 2016 12:58PM

Bruins will run the table. What happened to Mike Clarke is he still working at Braddock?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bruin NATION! ()
Date: September 18, 2016 02:53PM

Agreed it is a given Lake Braddock wins state this year

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bruins ()
Date: September 18, 2016 08:49PM

There are no givens. If P finds out a kid is posting you are done. P don't like talkers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bruins baby ()
Date: September 18, 2016 10:53PM

Poythress knows this is the year - it is a sure thing. Lake Braddock wins the states...............!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Poythress here ()
Date: September 18, 2016 11:01PM

I authorize all posts saying that Bruins will win the title this year as I am so sure this time.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Westfield Dad ()
Date: September 18, 2016 11:09PM

Don't be so sure Braddock boys, Westfield will have their say.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: tired of dis shit man ()
Date: September 19, 2016 12:23AM

Being an infrequent but interested reader of this site, time to shut up the Westfield and Lake Braddock fans - both getting out of control.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: HS Football Fan ()
Date: September 19, 2016 07:02AM

The only real way to stop the LB And WHS talk is to beat them. Those programs are contenders, not pretenders.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: GMGFU ()
Date: September 19, 2016 10:05AM

The discerning football fans realize these posts are from trolls (most likely the same person actually) and simply skip over and move along. Judging by the syntax and styled repetition it would appear to be the same person that was trolling the 2015 thread last October.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Playoff Question ()
Date: September 19, 2016 10:56AM

Is Mount Vernon really a contender? Has anyone seen them? Can they beat TC, Annandale, Woodson?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bulldog Fan ()
Date: September 19, 2016 11:31AM

Is Mount Vernon really a contender? Has anyone seen them? Can they beat TC, Annandale, Woodson?

---------------------------------------------------------------

Think pretender, they should beat Annandale, don't know about Woodson, very much doubt they have a chance against TC. I was impressed with TC this past Friday, they do have some athletes. It seems that Mount Vernon has benefited from a very weak schedule thus far. I also think West Springfield is overrated, just wanted to put that out there for those Major's fans that want to point that victory out.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Jugding Oakton (and crazy dad) ()
Date: September 19, 2016 02:43PM

Oakton Fan 1996-2016 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lots of people calling for Rowley's head. Not
> sure where this comes from. Have you seen the
> team or are you just going on history. The QB
> broke his collar bone on the first play against
> TC. They have two starting lineman out (1 being 1
> of the D1 kids everyone is talking about.) They
> have no running backs - but a freshman. They have
> no speed in the secondary and they are all 5'7.
> Just because they lost to Madison doesn't mean
> they are terrible. I would bet that Madison goes
> 10-0 or 9-1 this season. They are already 17-2 in
> their last 19 games - pretty impressive for that
> little school in Vienna. They should be getting
> way more respect than they are given.
>
> Another argument being thrown around is the school
> demo. Have you walked the school? It is
> basically turned into East Africa and Asia. The
> strong middle class student has been eliminated
> from the school. Look at the sports the Oakton
> dominates - girls sports, swimming, tennis, and
> distance running. Not basketball or football or
> lacrosse. Notice the teams that win in football -
> they dominate in football, basketball and
> lacrosse.
>
> Rowley is a good coach who is respected by peers.
> He is not dominate or loaded with talent. If I
> were him I would leave Oakton too. Oakton is not
> a job that anyone with brains would take. Coach
> Thompson and Coach Bendorf both had seasons like
> this while I have watched Oakton. People called
> for their heads too. Both coaches had state
> titles, coach of the year awards, and regional
> titles. Those just don't go away - people don't
> change that much. Rowley won coach of the year in
> 2012. The people on here calling for him to
> resign are all one parent who shall remain
> nameless - but if you sit in the stands like I do
> each Friday - you know who he is.


Spot on my good man. Nice kids...try hard, but just not enough there. Then add injury. At least you only have to sit in the stands with that guy. Could you imagine how awful it would be to be his son. "Back in the day, I was......", "You could be in the NFL if coach R knew what he was doing"...."You should be on the field every second"....he is the worst fan/parent I have seen in years. Not even close

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bulldog Fan ()
Date: September 19, 2016 03:59PM

Spot on my good man. Nice kids...try hard, but just not enough there. Then add injury. At least you only have to sit in the stands with that guy. Could you imagine how awful it would be to be his son. "Back in the day, I was......", "You could be in the NFL if coach R knew what he was doing"...."You should be on the field every second"....he is the worst fan/parent I have seen in years. Not even close

___________________________________________________________________

Does his kid play a skill position, possibly WR/TE?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Jagga ()
Date: September 19, 2016 04:38PM

Bulldog Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spot on my good man. Nice kids...try hard, but
> just not enough there. Then add injury. At least
> you only have to sit in the stands with that guy.
> Could you imagine how awful it would be to be his
> son. "Back in the day, I was......", "You could be
> in the NFL if coach R knew what he was
> doing"...."You should be on the field every
> second"....he is the worst fan/parent I have seen
> in years. Not even close
>
> __________________________________________________
> _________________
>
> Does his kid play a skill position, possibly
> WR/TE?


Rowley doesn't have a son

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bulldog Fan ()
Date: September 19, 2016 05:37PM

Jagga Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bulldog Fan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Spot on my good man. Nice kids...try hard, but
> > just not enough there. Then add injury. At
> least
> > you only have to sit in the stands with that
> guy.
> > Could you imagine how awful it would be to be
> his
> > son. "Back in the day, I was......", "You could
> be
> > in the NFL if coach R knew what he was
> > doing"...."You should be on the field every
> > second"....he is the worst fan/parent I have
> seen
> > in years. Not even close
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________
>
> > _________________
> >
> > Does his kid play a skill position, possibly
> > WR/TE?
>
>
> Rowley doesn't have a son



Yes I know, they're talking about one of the player's overbearing father.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: a coach ()
Date: September 20, 2016 05:27AM

Bulldog Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Spot on my good man. Nice kids...try hard, but
> just not enough there. Then add injury. At least
> you only have to sit in the stands with that guy.
> Could you imagine how awful it would be to be his
> son. "Back in the day, I was......", "You could be
> in the NFL if coach R knew what he was
> doing"...."You should be on the field every
> second"....he is the worst fan/parent I have seen
> in years. Not even close
>
> __________________________________________________
> _________________
>
> Does his kid play a skill position, possibly
> WR/TE?

on my team, we call them ball-touchers. It takes more skill to play the offensive line.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Steve K ()
Date: September 20, 2016 07:54AM

Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)

Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run

Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson

Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)

Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield

Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee

Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)

Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)

Madison (-14.0) @ Langley

Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)

Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton

South County (-20.0) @ West Springfield

South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean

Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)

West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
*Upset pick

Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge

Mount Vernon @ TC Williams (-6.0)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Conf 7 Guy ()
Date: September 20, 2016 09:38AM

Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)
I'll Take Woodson here


Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run
Think I'm going with Broad Run. BW has to feel gutted after last week.

Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson
Taking the Smart Kids. Edison is a bad, bad football team.

Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)
Yorktown wins but doesn't cover that spread.

Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield
Falls Church wins but does not cover

Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee
Might not be enough on that spread.

Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)
Chantilly covers.

Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)
Wow. When was the last time Stuart was favored? Probably the last time they played Lee. Stuart wins and covers.

Madison (-14.0) @ Langley
Madison wins and covers.

Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)
Potomac Falls wins and covers

Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton
Robinson wins and covers

South County (-20.0) @ West Springfield
South County wins and covers

South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean
South Lakes wins but does not cover that spread.

Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)
Centreville wins but does not cover.

West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
*Upset pick
Oooooh, intriguing. I'll take West Po too.

Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge
Westfield Wins and covers.

Mount Vernon @ TC Williams (-6.0)
TC wins and covers. Welcome back to reality, Majors.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Schedule maker ()
Date: September 20, 2016 10:38AM

Despite the Washington Post error, I just saw that the West Springfield South county game is actually at SoCo. Game was at West Springfield last year.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: NR fan ()
Date: September 20, 2016 02:44PM

I'll try my hand at this as well:


Conf 7 Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)
> I'll Take Woodson here

I'll go with Woodson as well. I was tempted to take Annandale and the points (Woodson winning but not covering), based on Annandale's win last week, but I decided not to. Woodson is having too good of a year.

>
> Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run
> Think I'm going with Broad Run. BW has to feel
> gutted after last week.

Don't know much about Loudon football, so I'll go along with this.
>
> Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson
> Taking the Smart Kids. Edison is a bad, bad
> football team.

Going with Edison here, and giving the points.

>
> Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)
> Yorktown wins but doesn't cover that spread.

Agree that Yorktown wins. Fairfax seems really down this year, so I think Yorktown will also cover that spread.

>
> Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield
> Falls Church wins but does not cover

I agree with this, Falls Church wins, but doesn't cover.
>
> Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee
> Might not be enough on that spread.

Hayfield wins, and I agree that the spread isn't enough. I think Hayfield wins this one by 35. Liberty is looking like a big three (Hayfield, Madison, South Lakes) and little five (Fairfax, Langley, Mclean, W-L, Yorktown) conference. If Hayfield can hang with South County, they'll demolish W-L.
>
> Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)
> Chantilly covers.

Agree, Chantilly wins and covers. They probably win by 14. Chantilly's season will be in jeopardy if they don't win this, and they know it. Knowing that will be enough for them to pull off the win.
>
> Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)
> Wow. When was the last time Stuart was favored?
> Probably the last time they played Lee. Stuart
> wins and covers.

Agree
>
> Madison (-14.0) @ Langley
> Madison wins and covers.

Agree that Madison will win and that they will cover that spread.
>
> Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)
> Potomac Falls wins and covers

Agree that Potomac Falls will win and cover that spread.
>
> Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton
> Robinson wins and covers

Agree that Robo will win and cover that spread.
>
> South County (-20.0) @ West Springfield
> South County wins and covers

This is a tough one, because Hayfield gave South County all they could handle. I'll go with South County winning, and covering, but just barely.
>
> South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean
> South Lakes wins but does not cover that spread.

Agree that South Lakes will win, but I think they will also cover. Last week, Madison was a 35 point favorite against McLean. If you install South Lakes as only a 28 point favorite, that means you think Madison is the better of the two. While that may happen, I don't think that's at all clear yet. I watched a bit of the South Lakes Yorktown game, and it wasn't really as close as the final score would have indicated. South Lakes is for real.
>
> Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)
> Centreville wins but does not cover.

I think Centreville wins and covers.
>
> West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
> *Upset pick
> Oooooh, intriguing. I'll take West Po too.

Nope, I'm going with Lake Braddock to win (I especially like getting 3 points).
>
> Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge
> Westfield Wins and covers.

On a hunch, I'll go with Stone Bridge.
>
> Mount Vernon @ TC Williams (-6.0)
> TC wins and covers. Welcome back to reality,
> Majors.

Agree. I think TCW wins by a TD, so that means they cover.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: dummy the greek ()
Date: September 20, 2016 09:52PM

Steve K Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)

Woodson wins and covers

> Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run

Briar Woods had a ton of disastrous penalties last week and still managed to be in it until the final play. They get a double digit W.

> Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson

What the heck happened to Edison? That said, Jefferson lost a scrimmage to George Mason, so take the Eagles by two TDs

> Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)

Yorktown wins by three scores


> Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield


Falls Church wins, but only by 7


> Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee


W-L had a brutal schedule to start the season, but they're still not good enough to cover.

> Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)


Chantilly routs 'em


> Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)


Stuart is legit, wins by double digits


> Madison (-14.0) @ Langley


Two touchdowns seems low. Take Madison


> Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)


Don't know squat about PF, but sure


> Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton


Robinson wins and covers


> South County (-20.0) @ West Springfield


South County rolls by at least 30

>
> South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean


South Lakes by clubbing. Take the points.


> Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)


C'ville by two TDs


> West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock

> *Upset pick

Agreed. West Potomac didn't play a great game last week and still won against a much bigger Briar Woods team. Haven't seen LB yet, but if West Po can get their passing game on track they seem pretty dangerous.


> Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge

Stone Bridge with the upset


> Mount Vernon @ TC Williams (-6.0)

Majors win by 14. Mount Vernon has hurt people with big plays. T.C. hasn't scored more than 20 points in a game yet.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Conf. 5 ()
Date: September 21, 2016 09:50PM

I got Herndon on the upset this week. @ Chantilly for their homecoming. Herndon upset last time they picked them as their homecoming. Watch for the upset.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: football observer ()
Date: September 22, 2016 12:07AM

Steve K Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)

Annandale covers. They're not that bad, Woodson's not that good.

> Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run

Briar Woods finally wins a close one.

> Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson

The biggest game of the year in the area. TJ dropped their regular non-district opponents to schedule three games they thought would be winnable, and got destroyed in all three. Edison has at least gotten slaughtered by real teams, so I'll go with the Eagles to cover.

> Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)

Worst Yorktown team in a long time but still good enough to cover here.

> Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield

Falls Church showed signs of life last week, Wakefield didn't. Jags cover.

> Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee

Hayfield wins easy covers.

> Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)

Chantilly covers.

> Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)

Lee will do okay in district play and gets the win here.

> Madison (-14.0) @ Langley

Possible letdown for Madison here by they should cover.

> Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)

Potomac Falls had more trouble than expected with Langley last week but gets a close cover here.

> Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton

Robinson easy.

> South County (-20.0) @ West Springfield

Big spread. Spartans lose but cover.

> South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean

South Lakes unless they decide to give up late scores like last week.

> Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)

Not the same Tuscarora team as the last couple years, Centreville covers.

> West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
> *Upset pick

If LB puts the ball in their RBs hands I don't think West Po can stop them.

> Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge

Westfield.

> Mount Vernon @ TC Williams (-6.0)

No idea what to make of either team. Could be 35-7 either way and I wouldn't be surprised.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: PubLe ()
Date: September 22, 2016 07:36PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: hahahaha ()
Date: September 23, 2016 09:38PM

Westfield lost. Centreville lost. Robinson Lost.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Shocked man ()
Date: September 23, 2016 09:40PM

Well damn 6A North is really up for grabs.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Hec ()
Date: September 23, 2016 09:41PM

So I guess the only state champ contenders left are Madison, Lake Braddock
Westfield sucks
Centervillles gonna have another 4-6 season
Robinson just lost to Oakton who looked very dominating considering there missing multiple starters
West Potomic looks pretty good

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Seahawk ()
Date: September 23, 2016 09:45PM

Hec Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So I guess the only state champ contenders left
> are Madison, Lake Braddock
> Westfield sucks
> Centervillles gonna have another 4-6 season
> Robinson just lost to Oakton who looked very
> dominating considering there missing multiple
> starters
> West Potomic looks pretty good


Let's not forget South Lakes

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: losers ()
Date: September 23, 2016 09:55PM

Madison and South Lakes...ha ha ha ha...play some big boy football before you step up and run your mouth....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Naww son you a loser ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:06PM

losers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Madison and South Lakes...ha ha ha ha...play some
> big boy football before you step up and run your
> mouth....


Madison beat Stone Bridge who just destroyed Westfield, they also beat Oakton who beat Robinson so how are they not playing good teams. South Lakes almost beat Westfield last year they look alot better this year

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: SB vs Westfield ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:28PM

Not too surprised that SB beat WF but the beat down, emasculating, run it down your throat manner in which they did so is surprising. As bad as it looked for Madison to have to move to the concord next year its starting to look like the concord won't be the same old concord it used to be.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: WF Fan ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:39PM

Westfield lost and they deserved to lose no doubt about it. I am in no way saying that Westfield is the team to beat but when have they ever been truly dominant in the regular season? They'll get better as the season progresses and when they get fully healthy. They won't be the dominant team that we thought they'd be but they have loads of talent and probably the best Coaching Staff in the area. They will be fine.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: dummy the greek ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:42PM

Great game between West Po and LB. Bruin defense stepped up big time in OT.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Darthblazer67 ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:45PM

Madison beat Langley 33-14 or something like that.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: WF Fan ()
Date: September 23, 2016 10:45PM

I know though that I am delusional and am thinking of days gone by and wish Scanlon was still here to make sure everything ok and Westfield is still the bestest and does this still mean we can have the dixie cup parade tomorrow night and....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Some Ideas ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:06PM

...and South Lakes really ran up the score at hapless McLean 75-8...that is just not sporting on your opponents grounds.

Madison score confirmed as 33-14 against Langley

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: darthblazer67 ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:08PM

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/29/2017 11:37PM by darthblazer67.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Some Ideas ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:12PM

and...

...Madison's challenge is they play South Lakes away on 10/14 and Hayfield away to close the season. Any team that puts up 46 points on South County needs to be respected.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Coga ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:13PM

Oaktons back bitches

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Bulldog Fan ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:20PM

We are good and people do still love us, we are good and people do still love us, we are good and hopefully people still do love us....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: pLcVv ()
Date: September 23, 2016 11:43PM

WF Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Westfield lost and they deserved to lose no doubt
> about it. I am in no way saying that Westfield is
> the team to beat but when have they ever been
> truly dominant in the regular season? They'll get
> better as the season progresses and when they get
> fully healthy. They won't be the dominant team
> that we thought they'd be but they have loads of
> talent and probably the best Coaching Staff in the
> area. They will be fine.

I don't know about that. You can't fix size and toughness. There was nothing wrong with the way their defense played other than that they got physically overpowered. TC Williams showed everyone the way. Other than #93 their defensive line is is very soft. And without #23 and #32 their linebacking corps is way undersized - maybe 1 LB over 170 lbs? And without #6 their entire backfield is like 5-8 and maybe 160 lbs. Make no mistake, this was a beatdown and Westfield was thrashed on both lines of scrimmage.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: McLean ()
Date: September 24, 2016 12:36AM

I was at the south lakes game. They are definitely very good.. But McLean wow. Looking at the roster south lakes was playing mostly Jv kids and even freshmen starting in the 2nd quarter.. It's like south lakes wasn't even trying to score but couldn't help it. It is beyond bad at McLean what happened?!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Watcher of WF football ()
Date: September 24, 2016 07:59AM

WF Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Westfield lost and they deserved to lose no doubt
> about it. I am in no way saying that Westfield is
> the team to beat but when have they ever been
> truly dominant in the regular season? They'll get
> better as the season progresses and when they get
> fully healthy. They won't be the dominant team
> that we thought they'd be but they have loads of
> talent and probably the best Coaching Staff in the
> area. They will be fine.

I don't know about that. You can't fix size and toughness. There was nothing wrong with the way their defense played other than that they got physically overpowered. TC Williams showed everyone the way. Other than #93 their defensive line is is very soft. And without #23 and #32 their linebacking corps is way undersized - maybe 1 LB over 170 lbs? And without #6 their entire backfield is like 5-8 and maybe 160 lbs. Make no mistake, this was a beatdown and Westfield was thrashed on both lines of scrimmage.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree completely, it's been that way all season, what masked it was that WF hadn't played a physical opponent till last night. SOCO is not a physical team, nor is W&L, TC Williams somewhat, but none are in the category of Stone Bridge. What was amazing is SB just kept running the same plays and WF couldn't stop them. SB's ball carriers ran over and through the WF defense. Even with #23 & #32 the outcome most probably would've been the same, maybe not so lopsided. Anyone who watched this team in preseason, and took a realistic view, could see this happening. This is one of the smallest WF teams I've seen in a longtime, to make matters worse not very deep either. The play calling on offense was also very questionable. But that's nothing new for anyone who's watched this team for the past few years. Bottom line is this is an above average team, good thing for WF that it appears the rest of 6A North is pretty much as well. I'm still not sold on LB, they've got a couple really good players, just like most of the top teams, but that's it. I would say more so than anytime in recent memory the region is up for grabs. Just my opinion, I'm sure many will disagree....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Watcher of WF football ()
Date: September 24, 2016 08:07AM

Watcher of WF football Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WF Fan Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------
> ------
> > Westfield lost and they deserved to lose no
> doubt
> > about it. I am in no way saying that Westfield
> is
> > the team to beat but when have they ever been
> > truly dominant in the regular season? They'll
> get
> > better as the season progresses and when they
> get
> > fully healthy. They won't be the dominant team
> > that we thought they'd be but they have loads
> of
> > talent and probably the best Coaching Staff in
> the
> > area. They will be fine.
>
> I don't know about that. You can't fix size and
> toughness. There was nothing wrong with the way
> their defense played other than that they got
> physically overpowered. TC Williams showed
> everyone the way. Other than #93 their defensive
> line is is very soft. And without #23 and #32
> their linebacking corps is way undersized - maybe
> 1 LB over 170 lbs? And without #6 their entire
> backfield is like 5-8 and maybe 160 lbs. Make no
> mistake, this was a beatdown and Westfield was
> thrashed on both lines of scrimmage.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
>
> I agree completely, it's been that way all season,
> what masked it was that WF hadn't played a
> physical opponent till last night. SOCO is not a
> physical team, nor is W&L, TC Williams somewhat,
> but none are in the category of Stone Bridge. What
> was amazing is SB just kept running the same plays
> and WF couldn't stop them. SB's ball carriers ran
> over and through the WF defense. Even with #23 &
> #32 the outcome most probably would've been the
> same, maybe not so lopsided. Anyone who watched
> this team in preseason, and took a realistic view,
> could see this happening. This is one of the
> smallest WF teams I've seen in a longtime, to make
> matters worse not very deep either. The play
> calling on offense was also very questionable. But
> that's nothing new for anyone who's watched this
> team for the past few years. Bottom line is this
> is an above average team, good thing for WF that
> it appears the rest of 6A North is pretty much as
> well. I'm still not sold on LB, they've got a
> couple really good players, just like most of the
> top teams, but that's it. I would say more so than
> anytime in recent memory the region is up for
> grabs. Just my opinion, I'm sure many will
> disagree....


BTW, SB had 461 rushing yards on 54 attempts against WF's defense, 8.5 yards per carry. That speaks volumes of how small and weak WF's defense is!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Steve K ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:04AM

Here are the results from this week, there were a number of surprises. As one of you alluded to, I am shocked Centreville, Westfield, and Robinson went down on the same night. This is the most up for grabs I have seen the region in at least the last 10 years. There is no team that is really that good this year. After seeing Braddock and Robinson in person, I was ready to write both off and pick Westfield as usual, but then last night happened and I am unsure of myself. This might be the year for the Liberty, and all of a sudden Hayfield, South Lakes, and Madison become legitimate region contenders to go along with South County, Lake Braddock, West Potomac and the Concorde schools as they sort themselves out.

Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)
*Woodson won 32-8

Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run
*Broad Run won 36-21, Loudoun score so don’t hold it against me!

Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson
*Edison won 48-0; the same Edison that had been outscored by 150+ their first 3 games, TJ is in trouble this year as that was the easiest team remaining on their schedule.

Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)
*Yorktown won 41-0. The bottom is pretty bad as strong as the top of the conference is.

Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield
*Falls Church won 49-21. Falls Church looks like the favorite to win their conference.

Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee
*Hayfield won 54-29.

Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)
*Chantilly won 26-7

Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)
*Lee beat Stuart 28-12.

Madison (-14.0) @ Langley
*Madison beat Langley 33-14.

Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)
*Potomac Falls beat Marshall 54-20.

Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton
*Oakton beat Robinson 21-7. The problem is if a team refuses to pass and only has one elite back he can be stopped. Robinson is going to have to do something different offensively.

West Springfield @ South County (-20.0)
*South County won 51-25.

South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean
*South Lakes won 75-8

Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)
*Tuscarora won 21-14. I haven’t seen Centreville play yet, but this one surprised me.
West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
*Upset pick came close, Lake Braddock won 24-21 in overtime.

Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge
*Stone Bridge won 34-16.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Hdhb ()
Date: September 24, 2016 10:51AM

Westfield can't even beat a fucking 5A team. Might as well cancel the rest of the season and starting basketball practice.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Idiot ()
Date: September 24, 2016 11:03AM

Westfield was emasculated - top to bottom. However, don't disparage 5A teams. ^A teams should rout 5A, but typically don't.

They often beat the local 6A teams. Better coaching in Loudoun than Fairfax. Top coaches in Loudoun tool on Fairfax's best.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Tidbits ()
Date: September 24, 2016 11:30AM

Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)
*Woodson won 32-8

Woodson is now strong enough of a program to roll over the dregs, but still get beat up on by the best 6 or 7 teams in the region. And beat badly.
_______________________________________________________________________________


Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run
*Broad Run won 36-21, Loudoun score so don’t hold it against me!

Broad Run still has Oakton, Robinson, and Stone Bridge to play. Tough schedule, but very good team. Once again this year, Briar is now the best 1-4 team in the state!

_______________________________________________________________________________


Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson
*Edison won 48-0; the same Edison that had been outscored by 150+ their first 3 games, TJ is in trouble this year as that was the easiest team remaining on their schedule.

Jefferson should fold their football program - hell, all programs except for tennis and ping pong. Edison? Still horrific, just not as horrific as TJ.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)
*Yorktown won 41-0. The bottom is pretty bad as strong as the top of the
conference is.

Never had a year where bottom tier teams are so putrid. Fairfax is one of those. Hell, so is Yorktown. Shows how far Rebels has fallen.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield
*Falls Church won 49-21. Falls Church looks like the favorite to win their conference.

You are probably correct. Falls Church got beat by Potomac Falls by 32, yet the only game left they will lose is against Oakton. Maybe the worst 7-3 team in the state this year. Will get manhandled again in the playoffs.
_______________________________________________________________________________


Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee
*Hayfield won 54-29.

Hayfield is better this year. Not great, but better. Arlington schools are absolutely atrocious. All of them.
_______________________________________________________________________________


Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)
*Chantilly won 26-7


Chantilly stinks, yet won by almost 20. Herndon demographics mean that this school will never be good at football again. Soccer? Yes.

Swimming? Across the river? Yes. They should audible in Spanish.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)
*Lee beat Stuart 28-12.

It is that demographics thing again. That, and pussified white parents no longer allowing their little princes to play football for fear of drain bamage. Both teams are embarrassing.

Both schools named after racist white guys.

_______________________________________________________________________________


Madison (-14.0) @ Langley
*Madison beat Langley 33-14.


That Madison win over Stone Bridge looks a little more impressive now, doesn't it? Langley should join TJ and give up football.

_______________________________________________________________________________


Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)
*Potomac Falls beat Marshall 54-20.

Ugh - Marshall has reverted back to primordial ooze status. Woeful. PF is solid.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton
*Oakton beat Robinson 21-7. The problem is if a team refuses to pass and only has one elite back he can be stopped. Robinson is going to have to do something different offensively.

Let's pump the brakes a little on this one, shall we? Oakton is not going to get hot and make a run to the states this time, Cougar fans. Robinson? Might be missing a little in the ol' heart department. Forward pass? Ever heard of it?

_______________________________________________________________________________

West Springfield @ South County (-20.0)
*South County won 51-25.

God, SC loves to roll it up on the Little Sisters of the Poor, don't they? Still wide, wide open Region this year. Who the hell knows?
_______________________________________________________________________________

South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean
*South Lakes won 75-8

I can't believe Madison only scored 42 against the Highlanders. Must have brought full compliment of freshman to play 2nd half.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)
*Tuscarora won 21-14. I haven’t seen Centreville play yet, but this one surprised me.

Case in point. Tuscarora coach sees that Wildcats can't run, takes away the pass, and wins despite having weakest team he has had since 1st year of program. Centreville should be ashamed of themselves for this one. Tsk, tsk,
Haddock.

_______________________________________________________________________________


West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
*Upset pick came close, Lake Braddock won 24-21 in overtime.

Just shows that we have no juggernauts this year. Quite a game.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge
*Stone Bridge won 34-16.


Look on the bright side. At least now those idiots from Westfield that always post here will feel stupid and silly when they post more drivel. I mean, wow, what an ass kicking. And it is not like they haven't seen Stone Bridge before.

______________________________________________________________________________


Look later this week for our Bottom Ten Poll to come out. Lots of competition!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: dbfromnva ()
Date: September 24, 2016 11:41AM

"Tuscarora didn't take away the pass. Cville QB missed numerous wide open receivers at least 2 should have been easy TD's. Thought I was watching Kirk Cousins against the Cowboys. Also back judge(#6) ignored at least 2 blatant PI's. But Tuscarora deserved to win they outplayed and out coached Cville.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Westfield say What? ()
Date: September 24, 2016 12:40PM

Red Cups for tears...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: McLean Alum ()
Date: September 24, 2016 01:24PM

I have never seen a worse McLean football team. I'm embarrassed that this is what the program has come to. Horrendous. This coach may have ruined the entire program forever.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: footballveteran ()
Date: September 24, 2016 02:42PM

Idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> However, don't disparage 5A teams. ^A teams should
> rout 5A, but typically don't.

A true sign of a newbie that doesn't know or understand anything about football or sports in general at the high school level: thinks student enrollment is the primary indicator of on field performance. No. A 6A school should NOT necessarily "rout" a 5A team.

>
> They often beat the local 6A teams. Better
> coaching in Loudoun than Fairfax. Top coaches in
> Loudoun tool on Fairfax's best.

Again. No. Fairfax has excellent coaches - many better some not - than Loudoun. Loudoun football is seriously overrated by the preening football clinger-on's. It's not better than Fairfax football.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: footballveteran ()
Date: September 24, 2016 02:48PM

footballveteran Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Idiot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > However, don't disparage 5A teams. ^A teams
> should
> > rout 5A, but typically don't.
>
> A true sign of a newbie that doesn't know or
> understand anything about football or sports in
> general at the high school level: thinks student
> enrollment is the primary indicator of on field
> performance. No. A 6A school should NOT
> necessarily "rout" a 5A team.
>
> >
> > They often beat the local 6A teams. Better
> > coaching in Loudoun than Fairfax. Top coaches
> in
> > Loudoun tool on Fairfax's best.
>
> Again. No. Fairfax has excellent coaches - many
> better some not - than Loudoun. Loudoun football
> is seriously overrated by the preening football
> clinger-on's. It's not better than Fairfax
> football.

Again, see how this works? Heads I Win, Tails You Lose. 6A wins vs 5A: gets no credit because they "should" win. 5A wins vs 6A: see how much better our program is than theirs? SMH

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: NR fan ()
Date: September 24, 2016 03:01PM

A review of how I did

Steve K Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here are the results from this week, there were a
> number of surprises. As one of you alluded to, I
> am shocked Centreville, Westfield, and Robinson
> went down on the same night. This is the most up
> for grabs I have seen the region in at least the
> last 10 years. There is no team that is really
> that good this year. After seeing Braddock and
> Robinson in person, I was ready to write both off
> and pick Westfield as usual, but then last night
> happened and I am unsure of myself. This might be
> the year for the Liberty, and all of a sudden
> Hayfield, South Lakes, and Madison become
> legitimate region contenders to go along with
> South County, Lake Braddock, West Potomac and the
> Concorde schools as they sort themselves out.
>
> Annandale @ Woodson (-21.0)
> *Woodson won 32-8

Predicted Woodson to win and cover (but was nervous about it). Got this one right.
>
> Briar Woods (-1.0) @ Broad Run
> *Broad Run won 36-21, Loudoun score so don’t
> hold it against me!

I got this one wrong as well, but I don't know much about Loudon football either.
>
> Edison (-6.0) @ Jefferson
> *Edison won 48-0; the same Edison that had been
> outscored by 150+ their first 3 games, TJ is in
> trouble this year as that was the easiest team
> remaining on their schedule.

I took Edison and gave the points. I got this one right.

>
> Fairfax @ Yorktown (-14.0)
> *Yorktown won 41-0. The bottom is pretty bad as
> strong as the top of the conference is.

I got this one right. To be honest, I was waivering a bit on this, but glad I went with my gut. It seems like the new coach took over a program in worse shape than might have been expected, and it might take more than a year to repair that damage.
>
> Falls Church (-10.0) @ Wakefield
> *Falls Church won 49-21. Falls Church looks like
> the favorite to win their conference.

I took Falls Church to win, but not cover. I guess I underestimated Falls Church. I'm not sure they'll win their conference; I would expect it to be between them and Marshall.
>
> Hayfield (-20.0) @ Washington-Lee
> *Hayfield won 54-29.

I took Hayfield to win and cover and got this right. However, I expected a bigger blowout for Hayfield. Is this a letdown for Hayfield after their tough loss last week, or is W-L starting to get better? FWIW, W-L did improve over the course of last season, so it could happen again.
>
> Herndon @ Chantilly (-8.5)
> *Chantilly won 26-7

I took Chantilly to win and cover, and they did. Got this one right.
>
> Lee @ Stuart (-3.0)
> *Lee beat Stuart 28-12.

I took Stuart to win and cover. Got this one really wrong.
>
> Madison (-14.0) @ Langley
> *Madison beat Langley 33-14.

I took Madison to win and cover. Got this one right.


>
> Marshall @ Potomac Falls (-17.0)
> *Potomac Falls beat Marshall 54-20.

I took Potomac Falls to win and cover. Got this one right.
>
> Robinson (-7.0) @ Oakton
> *Oakton beat Robinson 21-7. The problem is if a
> team refuses to pass and only has one elite back
> he can be stopped. Robinson is going to have to
> do something different offensively.

I took Robo to win and cover. I really blew it on this one. I guess whatever was bothering Oakton, they have managed to solve it.

>
> West Springfield @ South County (-20.0)
> *South County won 51-25.

My prediction was, very nervously, for South County to win and cover, but barely. South County won. They covered. But barely. Got all of that right.
>
> South Lakes (-28.0) @ Mclean
> *South Lakes won 75-8

I said that the line on this game wasn't big enough. Little did I expect that South Lakes would cover that line in the first quarter. Hard to see how Mclean wins anything this year, even against some of the worst teams in Liberty.
>
> Tuscarora @ Centreville (-10.0)
> *Tuscarora won 21-14. I haven’t seen
> Centreville play yet, but this one surprised me.

I said Centreville would win and cover. Really blew it here.
>
> West Potomac (-3.0) @ Lake Braddock
> *Upset pick came close, Lake Braddock won 24-21 in
> overtime.

Thanks for making this an upset pick. I took lake Braddock and the points.
>
> Westfield (-6.0) @ Stone Bridge
> *Stone Bridge won 34-16.

On a hunch, I took Stone Bridge. Got that right.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: fightin titans ()
Date: September 24, 2016 03:35PM

TC 35 MV 34

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: vhslvhsl ()
Date: September 24, 2016 04:00PM

i thought block was playing for briar wood last year. how is it he is playing for stone brigde this season? how does stone brigde keep getting these atheletes?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Football Veteran Is a Fuck Stick ()
Date: September 24, 2016 04:03PM

Ok, tool time, explain how you have come to be a "football veteran" and know more than the rest of us? Try and follow, even as you breathe through your mouth: Schools with larger enrollments should be better than schools with smaller enrollments. This is not college, where there are nothing but recruits and the size of the student body has no bearing on how a team does. This is high school. Why do you think they even have divisions then? Try and refute this: Ok, so Centreville, Robinson and Westfield have had solid programs for years. So have Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone Bridge. So, Robinson and Westfield have 5600 students between them. Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone Bridge have 5450 Make up top two teams from each group and Loudoun wins each game by three touchdowns or more. Since you are simple, I will put it another way. Westfield has 2850 students. Stone Bridge has 1910. If you don't think that the extra 960 students gives them an advantage, you are simply a moron. I imagine if the schools were the same size, Stone Bridge would beat Westfield by 20 or more. Oh, wait, never mind. They don't need the extra kids to beat Westfield by 20! And if you don't think that Burnett from Tuscarora outcoached Haddock from Centreville to beat him last night, well, then there is no sense even trying to argue with an idiot such as yourself.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Football Fan ()
Date: September 24, 2016 06:30PM

Football Veteran Is a Fuck Stick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok, tool time, explain how you have come to be a
> "football veteran" and know more than the rest of
> us? Try and follow, even as you breathe through
> your mouth: Schools with larger enrollments should
> be better than schools with smaller enrollments.
> This is not college, where there are nothing but
> recruits and the size of the student body has no
> bearing on how a team does. This is high school.
> Why do you think they even have divisions then?
> Try and refute this: Ok, so Centreville, Robinson
> and Westfield have had solid programs for years.
> So have Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone Bridge.
> So, Robinson and Westfield have 5600 students
> between them. Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone
> Bridge have 5450 Make up top two teams from each
> group and Loudoun wins each game by three
> touchdowns or more. Since you are simple, I will
> put it another way. Westfield has 2850 students.
> Stone Bridge has 1910. If you don't think that the
> extra 960 students gives them an advantage, you
> are simply a moron. I imagine if the schools were
> the same size, Stone Bridge would beat Westfield
> by 20 or more. Oh, wait, never mind. They don't
> need the extra kids to beat Westfield by 20! And
> if you don't think that Burnett from Tuscarora
> outcoached Haddock from Centreville to beat him
> last night, well, then there is no sense even
> trying to argue with an idiot such as yourself.


Stone Bridge was definetly the better team last night but where did Westfield get 2850 kids from lol? They are nowhere near that. And let's not act like Loudoun County Schools don't have better demographics.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: West Po alum ()
Date: September 24, 2016 06:40PM

Let's go West Po! Gonna have to go check out one of their games. I see we're off to a good start.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: footballveteran ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:14PM

Football Veteran Is a Fuck Stick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok, tool time, explain how you have come to be a
> "football veteran" and know more than the rest of
> us? Try and follow, even as you breathe through
> your mouth: Schools with larger enrollments should
> be better than schools with smaller enrollments.
> This is not college, where there are nothing but
> recruits and the size of the student body has no
> bearing on how a team does. This is high school.
> Why do you think they even have divisions then?
> Try and refute this: Ok, so Centreville, Robinson
> and Westfield have had solid programs for years.
> So have Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone Bridge.
> So, Robinson and Westfield have 5600 students
> between them. Broad Run, Tuscarora, and Stone
> Bridge have 5450 Make up top two teams from each
> group and Loudoun wins each game by three
> touchdowns or more. Since you are simple, I will
> put it another way. Westfield has 2850 students.
> Stone Bridge has 1910. If you don't think that the
> extra 960 students gives them an advantage, you
> are simply a moron. I imagine if the schools were
> the same size, Stone Bridge would beat Westfield
> by 20 or more. Oh, wait, never mind. They don't
> need the extra kids to beat Westfield by 20! And
> if you don't think that Burnett from Tuscarora
> outcoached Haddock from Centreville to beat him
> last night, well, then there is no sense even
> trying to argue with an idiot such as yourself.

Sir - I refute your naive assertions. There are SO many other factors than student enrollment that are far more important in the performance of a football team. You are looking at a very artificial and unimportant factor.

So if a 6A school has 700 more students than a 5A school you say it is clear cut that they have an advantage. I say not necessarily. There are many 5A schools that have vastly larger numbers of kids going out for football than 6A schools. If a 5A school has a 100 kids going out for football and a 6A school has 45 - which one do you think has a better chance of fielding a better football team?

Geez... and that's only ONE factor and it is MORE important than total student enrollment.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Refute This... ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:32PM

Do you have ANYTHING to back up what you say? If you think the Loudoun schools I mentioned have more kids coming out for football than the three Fairfax schools, then you are sadly mistaken. What 5A schools have more kids coming out than 6A? Maybe Jefferson and Fairfax, etc, but I am not even considering those, since Loudoun beats those schools black and blue. The successful Fairfax schools have much larger enrollments, more kids trying out. Share some of your other factors...

Westfield numbers come from VHSL numbers.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: footballveteran ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:33PM

Football Veteran Is a Fuck Stick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And if you don't think that Burnett from Tuscarora
> outcoached Haddock from Centreville to beat him
> last night, well, then there is no sense even
> trying to argue with an idiot such as yourself.

Typical misdirection argument. Show me where I said Burnett didn't outcoach Haddock last night. Did I say that? No. You made this up in your own head. Now if you are saying Haddock is not a good coach than you are the idiot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Cheer ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:46PM

How about those Bulldog Cheerleaders. A little tipsy at the game?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: footballveteran ()
Date: September 24, 2016 09:50PM

Refute This... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you have ANYTHING to back up what you say?

No sir. Only what coaches and parents tell me. And I can see varsity rosters with my own eyes. I mean Stone Bridge does have more kids listed on their varsity football roster than Westfield, Chantilly and Madison. Now I don't know what that means but it could be that even though Westfield, Chantilly and Madison are larger schools they might be having fewer kids playing football than Stone Bridge. I could be wrong...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: No more trolls? ()
Date: September 25, 2016 06:38AM

Well, at least those damn WF trolls will stop spamming the board.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: So, Mr. Football Veteran ()
Date: September 25, 2016 07:46AM

... you admit that you have nothing to back up what you say? You, Sir, are not a football veteran....

You are a Democrat!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Daniel Carver ()
Date: September 25, 2016 08:26AM

Centreville is a pop Warner team at best, players are lazy and font listen to the coaches,,the team sucks and will never amount to shit...bottom feeders

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Laying some truth on you all ()
Date: September 25, 2016 09:09AM

Congrats to Westfield for throwing the game against Stone Bridge. Coach had the kids lay down on this one to keep the rest of the teams from quitting. Westfield: doing the right thing again.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Steroids ()
Date: September 25, 2016 08:28PM

What area teams juice to get bigger & faster. It doesn't look like 2016 version of Westfield is? Their just too small & slow compared to last year's teams.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Some Ideas ()
Date: September 25, 2016 09:09PM

Hmmm...let's see Stone Bridge's former quarterback Ryan Burns is starting QB at Stanford. You know...that really shabby school on the west coast.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Stone Bridge ()
Date: September 25, 2016 10:06PM

Stone Bridge is clearly the best team to ever play in Virginia or in the US for that matter.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: EHSFTBLL ()
Date: September 26, 2016 03:30PM

Edison with a dominant 48-0 victory over Jefferson is the team to beat!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: 6A Ranker of Football ()
Date: September 26, 2016 04:00PM

6A North Top 10?

1.Lake Braddock
2.Madison
3.South Lakes
4.West Potomac
5.Westfield
6.South County
7.Robinson
8.Centreville
9.Battlefield
10.TC Williams

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Waterboy ()
Date: September 26, 2016 04:40PM

6A North Top 10

1.Lake Braddock - Stud RB & very hungry
2.Madison - underrated beat a good SB team
3.South Lakes - Maybe this is the year
4.West Potomac - have not heard much.
5.Westfield - O-line & D-line are small. Secondary is even smaller. Overrated with limited running game.
6.South County - Have the athletes, need focus.
7.TC Williams - underrated have some studs
8.Robinson - need to pass pass pass
9.Centreville - overrated coach and team.
10.Battlefield - always good

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: CKmc9 ()
Date: September 26, 2016 05:08PM

Waterboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 6A North Top 10
>
> 1.Lake Braddock - Stud RB & very hungry
> 2.Madison - underrated beat a good SB team
> 3.South Lakes - Maybe this is the year
> 4.West Potomac - have not heard much.
> 5.Westfield - O-line & D-line are small. Secondary
> is even smaller. Overrated with limited running
> game.
> 6.South County - Have the athletes, need focus.
> 7.TC Williams - underrated have some studs
> 8.Robinson - need to pass pass pass
> 9.Centreville - overrated coach and team.
> 10.Battlefield - always good

What about Oakton?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: WF Fan ()
Date: September 26, 2016 07:33PM

Stop hating on Westfield's secondary they've actually been very good.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: CKmc9 ()
Date: September 26, 2016 07:34PM

I will hate all I want because I uniquely know and understand football in the Northern Region so what I say is the truth.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: zcb ()
Date: September 26, 2016 08:01PM

Waterboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 6A North Top 10
>
> 1.Lake Braddock - Stud RB & very hungry
> 2.Madison - underrated beat a good SB team
> 3.South Lakes - Maybe this is the year
> 4.West Potomac - have not heard much.
> 5.Westfield - O-line & D-line are small. Secondary
> is even smaller. Overrated with limited running
> game.
> 6.South County - Have the athletes, need focus.
> 7.TC Williams - underrated have some studs
> 8.Robinson - need to pass pass pass
> 9.Centreville - overrated coach and team.
> 10.Battlefield - always good

Awful rankings, please explain why Robinson or C'Ville are in these rankings.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Watcher of WF football ()
Date: September 26, 2016 08:04PM

Re: High School Football 2016

Posted by: WF Fan ()

Date: September 26, 2016 07:33PM


Stop hating on Westfield's secondary they've actually been very good.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

You're kidding right? Yeah, the one small Westfield DB picked off a few passes the other night, one was tipped and one was a horrible throw. Both right to him, would've been pretty tough to miss. But both he and one other DB repeatedly whiffed on tackles or were just plain run over and threw by the Stone Bridge athletes all night. For that matter there were a number of defenders that looked awful for WF but the two mentioned above were the most pathetic. On the last long TD run the one DB actually attempts to shoulder the SB player to the ground. You're kidding right, kid for SB weighs about 215 pounds, the undersized DB for WF maybe 145. Westfield's secondary is abysmal now that their best DB is out for the season. What most surprises me is how SB just gutted WF up the middle all night, averaging about 8.5 yards per carry. WF appears to have some heavyweights on the interior of the D-line but they are not stout at all. Defense wins championships so WF should be concerned cause this by far is the weakest D they've had in awhile.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: zcb ()
Date: September 26, 2016 08:17PM

I ask again why are they in the ratings - I am all knowing I know exactly how these teams will end up - listen to me, listen to me!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Watcher of WF football ()
Date: September 26, 2016 09:32PM

Re: High School Football 2016

Posted by: zcb ()

Date: September 26, 2016 08:17PM


I ask again why are they in the ratings - I am all knowing I know exactly how these teams will end up - listen to me, listen to me!

-------------------------------------------------------------

Why is Battlefield on the list, they lost to Riverbend who's 2-3 and North Stafford.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Nahnahnahnah ()
Date: September 27, 2016 07:10AM

Bottom 4 need to be adjusted. Hayfield is in that mix.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: westfielddadx2 ()
Date: September 27, 2016 09:00AM

Watcher of WF football Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> You're kidding right? Yeah, the one small
> Westfield DB picked off a few passes the other
> night, one was tipped and one was a horrible
> throw. Both right to him, would've been pretty
> tough to miss. But both he and one other DB
> repeatedly whiffed on tackles or were just plain
> run over and threw by the Stone Bridge athletes
> all night. For that matter there were a number of
> defenders that looked awful for WF but the two
> mentioned above were the most pathetic. On the
> last long TD run the one DB actually attempts to
> shoulder the SB player to the ground. You're
> kidding right, kid for SB weighs about 215 pounds,
> the undersized DB for WF maybe 145. Westfield's
> secondary is abysmal now that their best DB is out
> for the season. What most surprises me is how SB
> just gutted WF up the middle all night, averaging
> about 8.5 yards per carry. WF appears to have some
> heavyweights on the interior of the D-line but
> they are not stout at all. Defense wins
> championships so WF should be concerned cause this
> by far is the weakest D they've had in awhile.

Getting a little harsh here. I think should back off a tad. Kids can’t help if they are the best players available. You play with what you got. Secondary play has been adequate. Complaining about a DB not making an open field tackle downfield. How did RB get there. And the kid made the catches on those picks. Give him some credit.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Planks ()
Date: September 27, 2016 10:22AM

Waterboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 6A North Top 10
>
> 1.Lake Braddock - Stud RB & very hungry
> 2.Madison - underrated beat a good SB team
> 3.South Lakes - Maybe this is the year
> 4.West Potomac - have not heard much.
> 5.Westfield - O-line & D-line are small. Secondary
> is even smaller. Overrated with limited running
> game.
> 6.South County - Have the athletes, need focus.
> 7.TC Williams - underrated have some studs
> 8.Robinson - need to pass pass pass
> 9.Centreville - overrated coach and team.
> 10.Battlefield - always good
Horrible list Centreville and Robinson don't belong in this list, Hayfeild and Oakton have to be on this list, Hell Oakton might make top 5 if they manage to beat Westfield it's not impossible

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: 6A Ranker of Football ()
Date: September 27, 2016 11:23AM

In my hurry I forgot about a few teams yes. I think the 16 playoff teams would come from the below?

1. Lake Braddock (4-0)
2. Madison (4-0)
3. South Lakes (4-0)
4. West Potomac (3-1)
5. Westfield (3-1)
6. South County (3-1)
7. Hayfield (3-1)
9. Oakton (2-2)
10. TC Williams (2-2)
11. Centreville (3-1)
12. Robinson (2-2)
13. Battlefield (3-2)
14. Woodson (3-1)
15. Annandale (2-3)
16. Chantilly (2-2)
17. Patriot (3-2)
18. Mount Vernon (3-1)
19. West Springfield (1-3)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: pulier ()
Date: September 27, 2016 06:03PM

Mt. Vernon should at least be ranked ahead of Annandale.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: SidelineDad ()
Date: September 27, 2016 06:16PM

Did anybody witness the embarassing confrontation between a foul-mouthed West Po Dad and the West Po coaching staff at the WestPo-Lake Braddock game last Friday night? I was standing nearby with my teenage daughter when the blowhard came charging out of the stands toward the Wolverine bench. It looked like a police officer was about to put the cuffs on him before he finally shut up.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: NR fan ()
Date: September 27, 2016 06:37PM

6A Ranker of Football Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In my hurry I forgot about a few teams yes. I
> think the 16 playoff teams would come from the
> below?
>
> 1. Lake Braddock (4-0)
> 2. Madison (4-0)
> 3. South Lakes (4-0)
> 4. West Potomac (3-1)
> 5. Westfield (3-1)
> 6. South County (3-1)
> 7. Hayfield (3-1)
> 9. Oakton (2-2)
> 10. TC Williams (2-2)
> 11. Centreville (3-1)
> 12. Robinson (2-2)
> 13. Battlefield (3-2)
> 14. Woodson (3-1)
> 15. Annandale (2-3)
> 16. Chantilly (2-2)
> 17. Patriot (3-2)
> 18. Mount Vernon (3-1)
> 19. West Springfield (1-3)


You skipped a number. You have only 18 teams on this list.

With 18 teams listed, two on this list won't make it.

As far as the list goes, you list every team that is in Conference 7. They will all be playing each other over the next six weeks, so there will be a lot of losses racked up. I don't think that it's mathematically possible for all 8 Conference 7 teams will make it. The Conference 7 team I'd drop would be Annandale.

I would also add Yorktown, from Conference 6. It's not because they are particularly good, but if they emerge from the bottom of Conference 6, beating all four of the bottom 5 teams (I don't see them or anyone else in Liberty beating Madison, SL, or Hayfield), that gets them 5 wins, and that record might be good enough to get in. Again, it's not because they are particularly good, it's the way the math will work.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: figure this out ()
Date: September 27, 2016 07:08PM

Lake Braddock Madison, James South Lakes Westfield
South County Centreville Hayfield Woodson, W. T. Battlefield
Mount Vernon West Potomac Williams, T.C. Oakton Robinson, James Chantilly Yorktown
Patriot Annandale Osbourn Washington-Lee West Springfield Herndon Langley Osbourn Park McLean
Virginia High School League Page 2 of 12 2016 - 2017 Top Twenty Ranking Teams per Region
Group Region
6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North 6A 6A North
District
District 7 District 6 District 6 District 5 District 7 District 5 District 6 District 7 Cardinal District 7 District 7 District 7 District 5 District 5 District 5 District 6 Cardinal District 7 Cardinal District 6 District 7 District 5 District 6 Cardinal District 6
Won Lost Tied
4 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 2 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 4 0
Won Lost Tied
2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 0
Rating
30.00000 28.50000 28.50000 26.75000 26.25000 26.00000 25.75000 25.50000 25.00000 25.00000 25.00000 24.00000 23.50000 23.50000 22.50000 22.00000 21.60000 21.20000 19.80000 19.75000 19.50000 18.00000 17.75000 17.00000 17.00000
---------VHSL-------- -------District-------
Updatedon: 9/27/20169:24:12AM

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: too easy ()
Date: September 27, 2016 08:36PM

Current 6A playoff rankings

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: dummy the greek ()
Date: September 27, 2016 11:44PM

SidelineDad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did anybody witness the embarassing confrontation
> between a foul-mouthed West Po Dad and the West Po
> coaching staff at the WestPo-Lake Braddock game
> last Friday night? I was standing nearby with my
> teenage daughter when the blowhard came charging
> out of the stands toward the Wolverine bench. It
> looked like a police officer was about to put the
> cuffs on him before he finally shut up.


Was at the game and totally missed this. When did it happen? And who would want to fight West Po's coach, lol.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: lmaooo ()
Date: September 28, 2016 12:32AM

why does TJ cancel their football program? Have not won a game since October 2013.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: SidelineDad ()
Date: September 28, 2016 01:03PM

Re WestPo Dad: It was in the final minute of regulation. The dad came down from the stands screaming about the playcalling. F'n this. F'n that. Coach came over and told him he didn't understand the play. The dad said "F... You. That's my son out there." That's when the cop came over. A tip of the hat to the cop. It was an ugly situation. Sorry my daughter had to witness it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Fat Bastard ()
Date: September 28, 2016 01:58PM

Sure it wasn't Henderson...? he might have been hungry...get in my belly...your lucky you and your daughter escaped...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Lil' late ()
Date: September 28, 2016 04:33PM

Henderson lost a crap ton of weight though. Can't post any pictures, but he is pretty damn slim now.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Taco charlton ()
Date: September 28, 2016 04:47PM

PORT ST. LUCIE, Fla. -- Just count it as another page in the storybook career of Tim Tebow.

Tebow, on the first pitch of his first organized game since his junior year of high school, hit a 91 mph fastball over the left-center wall for a home run. After circling the bases, Tebow was greeted at the plate by his New York Mets instructional league teammates, who had poured out of the dugout.


Tim Tebow celebrates as he rounds the bases after hitting a home run on his very first pitch of an instructional league game Wednesday. AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez
Tebow, a former Heisman Trophy winner and NFL quarterback, had quietly taken those teenagers out to dinner Monday and to a movie Tuesday after intrasquad games.

The crowd, announced by the Mets at 269, also erupted as Tebow connected and circled the bases.

The long ball came off 6-foot-5 left-hander John Kilichowski, who was drafted by the St. Louis Cardinals in the 11th round out of Vanderbilt University in June.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: Hot Stuff Coming Through ()
Date: September 28, 2016 04:50PM

Right wing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What the fuck is wrong with you right wing nuts.
> First trump and now all this homosexuality on this
> board. Why can't we enjoy the topic of this forum.
> This is why websites like ESPN and etc switched
> to signing up through your Facebook account so you
> dumb ass trolls would piped down. This is an
> embarrassment to our county, state snd country.
> We're better than this

these boys are hot!
Attachments:
william moreno sterling virginia washington post lawsuit moreno family.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: edhEN ()
Date: September 28, 2016 04:51PM

6A Ranker of Football Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In my hurry I forgot about a few teams yes. I
> think the 16 playoff teams would come from the
> below?
>
> 1. Lake Braddock (4-0)
> 2. Madison (4-0)
> 3. South Lakes (4-0)
> 4. West Potomac (3-1)
> 5. Westfield (3-1)
> 6. South County (3-1)
> 7. Hayfield (3-1)
> 9. Oakton (2-2)
> 10. TC Williams (2-2)
> 11. Centreville (3-1)
> 12. Robinson (2-2)
> 13. Battlefield (3-2)
> 14. Woodson (3-1)
> 15. Annandale (2-3)
> 16. Chantilly (2-2)
> 17. Patriot (3-2)
> 18. Mount Vernon (3-1)
> 19. West Springfield (1-3)

Wow this is the best VA and NOVA has to offer? This state sucks at football.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: High School Football 2016
Posted by: jFKNe ()
Date: September 28, 2016 05:06PM

Looking at VA top recruits. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The state doesn't seem to have the talent it once
> did.


yeah not good at all.

Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: PreviousFirst...1112131415161718192021...LastNext
Current Page: 16 of 28


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  ********   **    **  **     **  **    ** 
 **  **  **  **     **  ***   **  **     **  ***   ** 
 **  **  **  **     **  ****  **  **     **  ****  ** 
 **  **  **  ********   ** ** **  **     **  ** ** ** 
 **  **  **  **         **  ****  **     **  **  **** 
 **  **  **  **         **   ***  **     **  **   *** 
  ***  ***   **         **    **   *******   **    ** 
This forum powered by Phorum.