Re: The expansion of the Chantilly expo center is complete! 1,300 tables for the nations gun show next weekend!
Posted by:
Wu6NN
()
Date: November 17, 2015 12:32PM
Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vxcyc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Uh, no. It's like how they have little to
> nothing
> > to do with the risk of having a gun in the home
> > for the vast majority of people as you tried to
> > inappropriately use the numbers.
>
> Uh YES, you worthless and degraded guntard
> asshole. Gun-related deaths are gun-related
> deaths. It's THAT simple. But you spend your
> cretin-time trying to explain them away. As if
> they didn't happen or didn't happen to people who
> matter to you. Such insanity is just another
> habit of poorly-balanced guntard assholes.
> Another aspect of being terminally skewed and
> stupid.
Once again with the bullshit obfuscation. No dummy, it's not that simple and gun deaths are not all equal to be lumped together in terms of risk of having a gun in the home. Which was the matter at hand.
The 20,000 suicide deaths generally do not apply to the larger population in Neither do the 6,000 - 8,000 homicides by young urban black men beyond that group. So even if you want to try to count risk in that bullshit way, then the more appropriate number to use would be in the range of 3,000 - 5,000 including intentional and unintentional deaths. Which works out to a trivial risk rate.
>
> > No, they aren't actually. First of all, your 4X
> number
> > is bullshit based on a study that was long ago
> debunked...
>
> LOL! There are many studies, you massive El Dopo,
> and they all show the very same thing. Sure, you
> can toss out the rat-crap nonsense that the NRA
> puts out, but one independent study after another
> has shown the same effect and in nearly the same
> degree. The simple facts of the matter -- facts
> that the comic-book brains of low-brow guntards
> are too poorly wired to grasp and face up to --
> are that having a gun in the home puts you at
> GREATER risk, NOT LESS. There is no serious
> debate of the matter. Just the babbling ignorance
> of guntard assholes.
>
No, in fact, that's exactly what you are doing. And even you know that your 4X bullshit with no basis is bullshit.
Yeah, post the source of your "4X" number. Any of them. All will show that the absolute risk is relatively tiny. 4X squat still is squat. And that's why you have to try to slip the stupid "4X"-type bullshit by to begin with. lol
> > If someone drove to the home and shot somebody,
> it
> > was counted.
>
> So if someone drives to your home and fatally
> shoots you, it is not a gun-related death? Your
> efforts to exclude the painfully obvious evidence
> against your silly claims grow ever more absurdly
> strained and ridiculous. A normal person would be
> ashamed of posts like yours.
It has nothing to do with the risk of a gun in the home. Which again was the matter in question per your "4X" bullshit number.
>
> > All of which were cited as greater risks than a
>
> > gun. In fact, guns ranked well down the list.
> lol
>
> For the Nth time, you witless stooge, IT DOES NOT
> MATTER if there are greater risks in the world.
> The focus is on THIS risk (quite a needless one,
> by the way), and the FACTS are that a person who
> keeps a gun in the home is nearly four times as
> likely to end up dead as the result of a gunshot
> wound. End of story. Even if your "source" were
> correct in its rankings, it would not be relevant.
> You might as well start claiming that the risks
> of heart disease are a reason to ignore all the
> death, injury, and human suffering that your
> pathetic little phony tough-guy toys result in.
>
> > Last, as before, you dumb "4X" number is
> > meaningless with no basis for the multiplier
> > provided. Even in the source study, the actual
> > risk at 4X the base it still was small.
>
> 30,000 annual deaths and 200,000 annual injuries
> serious enough to require treatment in an ER are
> NOT SMALL, except of course in the tiny minds of
> denier guntard assholes. Meanwhile, the
> multiplier that you math-whizzes have such trouble
> with is merely an expression of the difference in
> rates of death from gunshot wounds among those who
> keep a gun in the home versus those who are smart
> enough not to. Read 'em and weep, guntard.
Actually it's directly and very relevant to the mater of what risk exists as you claimed. "4X" tells you nothing with respect to the actual level of risk without a basis for what is being multiplied. 4X 0.0000001 = .0000004. i.e., Effectively none. Your bullshit otherwise doesn't change that fact. Mostly it says that you can't effectively argue the point so you have to post a bunch of bullshit. lol
>
> > Normal people do not attempt or commit suicide
> > simply because they have a gun.
>
> Such an utter dope! Suicide is a problem across
> society in general. People don't ATTEMPT suicide
> because they have a gun. They SUCCEED at it
> because they have a gun, as anyone but some
> maladroit mindless guntard asshole would have
> immediately recognized as the point of the matter.
> Guns greatly reduce the amount of time and effort
> involved in suicide while greatly increasing the
> chances of its success. Both of those are BAD
> THINGS, as I will certainly need to point out to
> just another garden-variety warped-brain guntard
> asshole.
>
Again you're confused dummy. If one doesn't attempt suicide, then there can be no success. Normal people (i.e., the vast majority) do not attempt suicide so they do not commit suicide by any method.
Furthermore, the various levels of success for suicide methods do not reflect absolute efficacy. The variance in the numbers primarily reflects very high numbers of para-suicides and pseudo-suicides by the less committed. Which is why by cutting and by drugs are so low, not that they are not effective when done right. Any given individual can kill themselves perfectly well by hanging, jumping, or with opiod pain killers. Just as they do in the case of the latter about 20,000 times/year. Because most are counted as accidents doesn't change the efficacy of the method. The rates of suicide by poisoning are low only because is because we have 100,000s of teenage girls who try to "commit suicide" because their boyfriend broke up with them by eating 10 tylenol.
> > Don't be mad cause I called you on your
> bullshit.
>
> Dream on, you ignorant NRA stooge! Facts are
> facts, and you don't have any of them. Meanwhile,
> it is an undeniable fact that your wonderful guns
> will end up killing perhaps another 85-90 people
> today, while severely wounding a further 550-600.
> The ER community will once again be busy, occupied
> in throwing expensive talent and resources at yet
> another wave of pointless death and trauma. Nice
> fucking work, you miserable little asshole.
>
^ That's why I'm presenting facts and you're left to try to bullshit your way though with crap like this. lmao
> > What I said is exactly right. If there were in
> > fact some large risk as you claim simply due to
> > the presence of a gun, then the numbers
> necessarily
> > would be many times greater just by math.
>
> You don't understand math either. Know your
> limits, dumbfuck! Keeping a gun in the home
> increases your chances of dying from a gunshot
> wound by a factor of nearly four. It's what
> happens. You can't wish it away.
>
Give me an actual rate and we can do the math. Is that so hard? Is there something that you're trying to hide by continuing to cite the number only on a relative basis?
> > Again, sorry for your loss.
>
> I can't hear you through all the smothering of
> your stupid-ass claims that's been done here. You
> have no answer or explanation at all for ANY of
> the needless death and agony that guns directly
> cause in our society every single day. You
> desperately want to pretend that it's not there,
> but all you have to work with is your store of
> asswipe-ignorant claims and fables. You're just a
> pathetic guntard dopester asshole, cowering in the
> corner in hopes of avoiding a confrontation with
> the plain and simple truth of your personal
> culpability for all this gun-related damage. You
> won't be winning any prizes here or anywhere else
> with a rap sheet as tainted and disgraceful as
> that.
So much effort and so many words to get nowhere and say nothing. It's like watching a fat kid dog paddling. lmao!
Again, sorry for your loss.