I sure hope to see lots of folks there.

http://www.thenationsgunshow.com/


If you are a bitch or a faggot or maybe a fat ass ignorant coward I'm sure you will be there.

Typical Guniggers.
Attachments:

I am sick an tire of all yall makin fun of gun owners. Guns make you smarter not dummer. My daddy once shot a black guy caus he was tryin ta steal some of our stuff. He got charged with a hate crime caus the guy was black. My daddy didnt even kill him or nothin. My daddy fired a warning shot into his leg. My daddy got 7 years an 6 months.

Hopefully this won't happen to any of us, but if the day comes when your home is invaded while you are in it, you might have wanted to have access to a weapon, something other than your limp dick. Because the truth be told, calling the police won't result in saving your life since it will be ten to fifteen minutes before they are able to respond. In that time a lot will happen and there will be nothing you can do except piss your pants when you realize you can't talk your way out of the very bad situation. Given that they are invading your home while you are there speaks to the fact that they probably don't care and will have no issue eliminating any witness testimony.

I for one don't want to be unable to at least attempt to defend myself. You can be the one who fails your family and home, not me.

So freaking dumb! Trying to pull a weapon on an armed intruder is statistically the WORST possible thing you can do. You are creating a life-or-death confrontation that you will almost certainly lose. What a dumb idea!

And given the million-to-one-like chances that any home will be broken into in such a manner, it is perfectly plain that all the NRA-scripted, Clint Eastwood, hang 'em high, cold dead hands, macho-macho-man blabber that comes out of the mouths of gun-nuts is simply an attempt to shore up low self-esteem and inflate manly-man ego damaged by some sort of insecurity or slight of the past. All it really does of course is keep emergency rooms and undertakers busy.

Get a gun if you live in the wilds of Alaska or in some recluse's cabin deep in the mountains of Montana. Otherwise, you'd be better off with a Snickers bar.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So freaking dumb! Trying to pull a weapon on an
> armed intruder is statistically the WORST possible
> thing you can do. You are creating a
> life-or-death confrontation that you will almost
> certainly lose. What a dumb idea!
>
> And given the million-to-one-like chances that any
> home will be broken into in such a manner, it is
> perfectly plain that all the NRA-scripted, Clint
> Eastwood, hang 'em high, cold dead hands,
> macho-macho-man blabber that comes out of the
> mouths of gun-nuts is simply an attempt to shore
> up low self-esteem and inflate manly-man ego
> damaged by some sort of insecurity or slight of
> the past. All it really does of course is keep
> emergency rooms and undertakers busy.
>
> Get a gun if you live in the wilds of Alaska or in
> some recluse's cabin deep in the mountains of
> Montana. Otherwise, you'd be better off with a
> Snickers bar.

Bullshit.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So freaking dumb! Trying to pull a weapon on an
> armed intruder is statistically the WORST possible
> thing you can do. You are creating a
> life-or-death confrontation that you will almost
> certainly lose. What a dumb idea!
>
> And given the million-to-one-like chances that any
> home will be broken into in such a manner, it is
> perfectly plain that all the NRA-scripted, Clint
> Eastwood, hang 'em high, cold dead hands,
> macho-macho-man blabber that comes out of the
> mouths of gun-nuts is simply an attempt to shore
> up low self-esteem and inflate manly-man ego
> damaged by some sort of insecurity or slight of
> the past. All it really does of course is keep
> emergency rooms and undertakers busy.
>
> Get a gun if you live in the wilds of Alaska or in
> some recluse's cabin deep in the mountains of
> Montana. Otherwise, you'd be better off with a
> Snickers bar.


Tell that to the millionaire in DC that had to sit and watch his kid being tortured while his house was set on fire, oh wait you cant, he didnt have that option available to defend his family.

slaughter house Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Off the hook stupid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So freaking dumb! Trying to pull a weapon on
> an
> > armed intruder is statistically the WORST
> possible
> > thing you can do. You are creating a
> > life-or-death confrontation that you will
> almost
> > certainly lose. What a dumb idea!
> >
> > And given the million-to-one-like chances that
> any
> > home will be broken into in such a manner, it
> is
> > perfectly plain that all the NRA-scripted,
> Clint
> > Eastwood, hang 'em high, cold dead hands,
> > macho-macho-man blabber that comes out of the
> > mouths of gun-nuts is simply an attempt to
> shore
> > up low self-esteem and inflate manly-man ego
> > damaged by some sort of insecurity or slight of
> > the past. All it really does of course is keep
> > emergency rooms and undertakers busy.
> >
> > Get a gun if you live in the wilds of Alaska or
> in
> > some recluse's cabin deep in the mountains of
> > Montana. Otherwise, you'd be better off with a
> > Snickers bar.
>
>
> Tell that to the millionaire in DC that had to sit
> and watch his kid being tortured while his house
> was set on fire, oh wait you cant, he didnt have
> that option available to defend his family.

Somebody around here isn't familiar with the 2nd Amendment.

If you're are not man enough to protect your family and/or gun, then you must be a chickenshit FFxU poster. You never give up or allow your weapon to be stolen.
Losing your gun is losing your dick.

slaughter house Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tell that to the millionaire in DC that had to sit
> and watch his kid being tortured while his house
> was set on fire, oh wait you cant, he didnt have
> that option available to defend his family.

Are you THAT stupid? Why not tell us how someone somewhere won the lottery which means that you're next! What a dumbfuck.

isbs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Somebody around here isn't familiar with the 2nd Amendment.

The 2nd Amendment was part of the slave compromises necessary to get enough states to ratify the Constitution. What it does is promise that Congress will not try to end slavery by disarming state militias in the slave-holding states. Those armed militias were the first (and only) line of defense that stood between southern whites and the much-feared barbarism of a slave uprising.

It's not what you think Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> isbs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Somebody around here isn't familiar with the 2nd
> Amendment.
>
> The 2nd Amendment was part of the slave
> compromises necessary to get enough states to
> ratify the Constitution. What it does is promise
> that Congress will not try to end slavery by
> disarming state militias in the slave-holding
> states. Those armed militias were the first (and
> only) line of defense that stood between southern
> whites and the much-feared barbarism of a slave
> uprising.

You need to read up on recent SCOTUS rulings.

Heller McDonald Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You need to read up on recent SCOTUS rulings.

They're not what you think either, dumbass. You just don't understand any of it. 250 years worth of stupid all wrapped up in one incompetent person.

It's not what you think Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Heller McDonald Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You need to read up on recent SCOTUS rulings.
>
> They're not what you think either, dumbass. You
> just don't understand any of it. 250 years worth
> of stupid all wrapped up in one incompetent
> person.

isbs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [image]stupid shit[/image]

Your brain is as small as your penis. Two-for-two in the shriveled up department. Gun-owner for sure!

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> slaughter house Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Tell that to the millionaire in DC that had to
> sit
> > and watch his kid being tortured while his
> house
> > was set on fire, oh wait you cant, he didnt
> have
> > that option available to defend his family.
>
> Are you THAT stupid? Why not tell us how someone
> somewhere won the lottery which means that you're
> next! What a dumbfuck.


Stupid is not being prepared , go blend in with the rest of the flock.

victims r us Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid is not being prepared...

Stupid is being prepared for the wrong thing. Out of sheer stupidity. Having a gun in the home reduces your life expectancy. You are more likely to be killed by someone else, and you are more likely to be killed by yourself, either accidentally or deliberately. So, if you have some sort of death-wish, buy a gun.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> victims r us Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Stupid is not being prepared...
>
> Stupid is being prepared for the wrong thing. Out
> of sheer stupidity. Having a gun in the home
> reduces your life expectancy. You are more likely
> to be killed by someone else, and you are more
> likely to be killed by yourself, either
> accidentally or deliberately. So, if you have
> some sort of death-wish, buy a gun.


By how much exactly? Please show your work and the numbers in absolute terms.

All told, living with a gun in the house increases your chances of dying from a gunshot wound by a factor of nearly four. You could look it up but are too fucking stupid to have done that already or to do it now.

Win Chester Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you are a bitch or a faggot or maybe a fat ass
> ignorant coward I'm sure you will be there.

No doot aboot it!

Several 747s will be en route to Dulles this week to make sure the show doesn't run out of hot dogs. Analysts are expecting 5.7 million hot dogs to be consumed next weekend, and a total of 4.9 billion calories to be consumed. Seismologists will be in town to study movements underneath the Earth's surface due to such a massive amount of weight consolidating into such a small area.

Should be a blast!

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> victims r us Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Stupid is not being prepared...
>
> Stupid is being prepared for the wrong thing. Out
> of sheer stupidity. Having a gun in the home
> reduces your life expectancy. You are more likely
> to be killed by someone else, and you are more
> likely to be killed by yourself, either
> accidentally or deliberately. So, if you have
> some sort of death-wish, buy a gun.


If you have some sort of death wish go buy a car and drive it, check those stats

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So freaking dumb! Trying to pull a weapon on an
> armed intruder is statistically the WORST possible
> thing you can do. You are creating a
> life-or-death confrontation that you will almost
> certainly lose. What a dumb idea!

And if by chance such a confrontation should occur, what is your plan of action? To hide under the bed crying "Take what you want but please don't hurt me!"

Once you know where your family is, hopefully all upstairs, the proper course is to shoot on sight anyone you encounter, not waiting to see what they might do or to attempt to scare them by the presence of your weapon. Take advantage of the element of surprise. They likely didn't come in with the plan to shoot you immediately, so use that moment to open fire. Even if you miss on the fist shot, it'll scare them long enough to make the next ones count.

My go-to gun holds 17 rounds, and when I grab it from the nightstand there's another full magazine next to it.

Someone tried to break into my house awhile back. The police took over 8 minutes to arrive. They were cool with me keeping my weapon, just asked that I lower it while they checked out the house. The back door showed signs of forced entry. Their advice? "Don't shoot them outside - wait until they get in. You're in the clear that way."

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hopefully this won't happen to any of us, but if
> the day comes when your home is invaded while you
> are in it, you might have wanted to have access to
> a weapon, something other than your limp dick.
> Because the truth be told, blah blah blah blah

Or maybe a simple gun accident will kill a family member.

You're way more likely to go on rampage and kill off your family than fight off a burglar with a gun in FFX county.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All told, living with a gun in the house increases
> your chances of dying from a gunshot wound by a
> factor of nearly four. You could look it up but
> are too fucking stupid to have done that already
> or to do it now.


I said in absolute terms and to reference the actual numbers. 4X squat still equals squat.

What is the actual rate?

Hint: It's relatively tiny. Far, fer below the risk rate for many other common causes of death in the home. Which is why you want to present the numbers on a relative basis and not the absolute numbers. And it's only at that tiny rate because it counts suicides which are N/A for the vast majority.

RERALI Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hopefully this won't happen to any of us, but
> if
> > the day comes when your home is invaded while
> you
> > are in it, you might have wanted to have access
> to
> > a weapon, something other than your limp dick.
> > Because the truth be told, blah blah blah blah
>
> Or maybe a simple gun accident will kill a family
> member.


How many of those happen every year? What's the actual rate again? How's that compare to other accidental deaths in the home?


> You're way more likely to go on rampage and kill
> off your family than fight off a burglar with a
> gun in FFX county.


Uhhh... No. There are far more burglaries than there are people going on a "rampage" and "killing off their family." lol

There are more and more gun suicides every year. Guntards just love to kill themselves and that is a good thing.

In the United States, annual firearm suicides total

2013: 21,17518
2012: 20,666
2011: 19,99018 19
2010: 19,39218
2009: 18,735
2008: 18,223
2007: 17,352
2006: 16,883
2005: 17,00218 49
2004: 16,75018
2003: 16,907
2002: 17,108
2001: 16,86918 46
2000: 16,58618
1999: 16,599

http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states

on the upside..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There are more and more gun suicides every year.
> Guntards just love to kill themselves and that is
> a good thing.
>
> In the United States, annual firearm suicides
> total
>
> 2013: 21,17518
> 2012: 20,666
> 2011: 19,99018 19
> 2010: 19,39218
> 2009: 18,735
> 2008: 18,223
> 2007: 17,352
> 2006: 16,883
> 2005: 17,00218 49
> 2004: 16,75018
> 2003: 16,907
> 2002: 17,108
> 2001: 16,86918 46
> 2000: 16,58618
> 1999: 16,599
>
> http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-st
> ates


There are more and more people every year. The rate/100,000 actually is below that of past decades despite +100 million more guns sold over that time.

And, as suicide is generally, it exists at significant levels only among those typically with long histories of mental illness and substance abuse. A typical person has little to no risk of suicide simply because they have a gun any more than they do of hanging themselves because they have rope.

on the upside..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Guntards just love to kill themselves and that is
> a good thing.


Then why are you bitching?

on the upside..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Guntards just love to kill themselves and that is
> a good thing.


Then why are you bitching?

Jimmy M. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> on the upside..... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Guntards just love to kill themselves and that
> is
> > a good thing.
>
>
> Then why are you bitching?


I'm not. Only good guntard is a dead guntard.

on the upside..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jimmy M. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > on the upside..... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Guntards just love to kill themselves and
> that
> > is
> > > a good thing.
> >
> >
> > Then why are you bitching?
>
>
> I'm not. Only good guntard is a dead guntard.

Then you should be cheering them on.

Another Gunfuck Asshole Wrote:
----------------------------------------------------
> And if by chance such a confrontation should
> occur, what is your plan of action?

My plan would be to survive. I'm not dumb enough to be interested in laying down my life for the sake of a TV. You assholes are giving the word "stupid" a bad name.

> Once you know where your family is, hopefully all
> upstairs, the proper course is to shoot on sight
> anyone you encounter...

LOL! Recon by fire. This is how you kill family members you lost track of Then you have to live with the horror of your own stupidity until such time as it overcomes you, and you end up killing yourself as well. Thank God for guns!

> My go-to gun holds 17 rounds, and when I grab it
> from the nightstand there's another full magazine
> next to it.

Cool stuff for thieves to boost and sell. Be sure to put an NRA sticker on your car too, dumbfuck.

> Someone tried to break into my house awhile back.

It was a raccoon, moron.

> Their advice? "Don't shoot them outside - wait until
> they get in. You're in the clear that way."

You must live in one of those neanderthal states. In the civilized world, your obligation is to use force only when other courses of action have been exhausted. You can get decades in prison otherwise.

You still did not explain how you will defend yourself in such a scenario. I guess you believe you will never have that happen to you. I have already successfully defended myself with a handgun from an attempted entry and assault. Held the perp utilize police arrived over ten minutes later. So you can keyboard quarterback all you want but don't write badly about others who have actually been in that situation. Theory is wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing like it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is better than your proposal to have nothing in hand!

As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for your family who will suffer as a result. My family is here today thanks to me and my gun.

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You still did not explain how you will defend
> yourself in such a scenario. I guess you believe
> you will never have that happen to you. I have
> already successfully defended myself with a
> handgun from an attempted entry and assault. Held
> the perp utilize police arrived over ten minutes
> later. So you can keyboard quarterback all you
> want but don't write badly about others who have
> actually been in that situation. Theory is
> wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing like
> it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is better
> than your proposal to have nothing in hand!
>
> As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for your
> family who will suffer as a result. My family is
> here today thanks to me and my gun.


That was a great story! I am so glad you were able to use your coward stick in a positive manor. That happens very rarely (about 1 out of 24 times). The sad thing is that in reality you are putting yourself and your family in danger by having a gun in the house but we both already know that you do not have the brains to realize that.

GN iz dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You still did not explain how you will defend
> > yourself in such a scenario. I guess you
> believe
> > you will never have that happen to you. I have
> > already successfully defended myself with a
> > handgun from an attempted entry and assault.
> Held
> > the perp utilize police arrived over ten
> minutes
> > later. So you can keyboard quarterback all you
> > want but don't write badly about others who
> have
> > actually been in that situation. Theory is
> > wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing
> like
> > it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is better
> > than your proposal to have nothing in hand!
> >
> > As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for your
> > family who will suffer as a result. My family
> is
> > here today thanks to me and my gun.
>
>
> That was a great story! I am so glad you were able
> to use your coward stick in a positive manor. That
> happens very rarely (about 1 out of 24 times). The
> sad thing is that in reality you are putting
> yourself and your family in danger by having a gun
> in the house but we both already know that you do
> not have the brains to realize that.


lol!

1 in 24 times would be a relatively high rate dumbshit. With about 4 million burglaries/year and about 28% being while occupied, that would be about 1.1 million potential occupied events. Using your 1 in 24 number, that would work out to about 46,000 events/year.

Outside of suicides by those inclined by mental illness already, there is a trivial risk to having a gun in the house. As far as deaths and the numbers go, it's far below having area rugs or stairs or prescription pain killers or any number of other common items in the house.

hyTNY Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GN iz dumb Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GN Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You still did not explain how you will defend
> > > yourself in such a scenario. I guess you
> > believe
> > > you will never have that happen to you. I
> have
> > > already successfully defended myself with a
> > > handgun from an attempted entry and assault.
> > Held
> > > the perp utilize police arrived over ten
> > minutes
> > > later. So you can keyboard quarterback all
> you
> > > want but don't write badly about others who
> > have
> > > actually been in that situation. Theory is
> > > wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing
> > like
> > > it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is
> better
> > > than your proposal to have nothing in hand!
> > >
> > > As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for
> your
> > > family who will suffer as a result. My family
> > is
> > > here today thanks to me and my gun.
> >
> >
> > That was a great story! I am so glad you were
> able
> > to use your coward stick in a positive manor.
> That
> > happens very rarely (about 1 out of 24 times).
> The
> > sad thing is that in reality you are putting
> > yourself and your family in danger by having a
> gun
> > in the house but we both already know that you
> do
> > not have the brains to realize that.
>
>
> lol!
>
> 1 in 24 times would be a relatively high rate
> dumbshit. With about 4 million burglaries/year
> and about 28% being while occupied, that would be
> about 1.1 million potential occupied events.
> Using your 1 in 24 number, that would work out to
> about 46,000 events/year.
>
> Outside of suicides by those inclined by mental
> illness already, there is a trivial risk to having
> a gun in the house. As far as deaths and the
> numbers go, it's far below having area rugs or
> stairs or prescription pain killers or any number
> of other common items in the house.


I think that one went right over your head. Thanks for proving beyond any doubt how incredibly stupid you are.

DVjpU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I said in absolute terms and to reference the
> actual numbers. 4X squat still equals squat.

The words of a pathetic asshole mean squat. Look it up. More than 30,000 people die from gunshot wounds in this country every year. Your chances of becoming one of those are nearly four times higher if you keep a gun in the home. Simple fact. Your chances of being murdered go up. Your chances of committing suicide go up. Your chances of being killed by an accidental gunshot go up. Friends and neighbors also face increased risks, but they aren't as high as those of you and yours. Despite your foolish fantasies and stupid self-deceits, actual criminals face virtually no increased risk at all.

Ding, ding, ding -- special bonus! Some 200,000 people get all shot up and scarred by gunshot wounds every year as well. But they manage to survive, thanks to very expensive medical treatment and often painful and difficult rehab programs. Your odds of enjoying a dose of all that go up as well when you keep a gun in the home. And that's all NEEDLESS RISK in exchange for fucking nothing. Nobody with an actual brain would go there.

> What is the actual rate? Hint: It's relatively tiny.
> Far, fer below the risk rate for many other common
> causes of death in the home.

Right. Here's more of that NRA swimming pool bullshit coming. You can see the brain-dead fucktards from many miles away. Just another case of fool-yourself stupid on your end.

> Which is why you want to present the numbers on a relative
> basis and not the absolute numbers. And it's only at that
> tiny rate because it counts suicides which are N/A for the
> vast majority.

Dead is dead, goober-tard. There are no different degrees of it. And having a gun in the home increases your chances of dying from a gunshot wound by a factor of nearly four. And that's in exchange for WHAT again? Oh, that's right -- FUCKING NOTHING.

I use my dirty butt plugs to fend of robbers

The hot dogs are being loaded up!

Why do you guys continue to troll guntards? There is no sport in it. It is like hunting squirrels with a peanut butter baited rat trap that is nailed to a tree. They never catch on to the game.
Pro-gun people are victims and they do not deserve to be tortured like this. This is not clever trolling.

XYbuV Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And, as suicide is generally, it exists at
> significant levels only among those typically with
> long histories of mental illness and substance
> abuse. A typical person has little to no risk of
> suicide simply because they have a gun any more
> than they do of hanging themselves because they
> have rope.

There's another bit of just plain asshole-level stupidity. The key to preventing suicide is to introduce delay -- time in which to rethink and reconsider. Guns do exactly the opposite -- they do a great job of assuring that a single moment of doubt or weakness will result in instant fatality. Among those who do manage to survive a near-thing suicide, the vast majority will tell you that it was a momentary and impulsive act, and that they are very glad to have gotten a second chance to live out the rest of their lives.

Guns in short are a public health hazard, and gun-ownership is itself a sign of potential mental illness.

They're calling in Russian support for this one,

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You still did not explain how you will defend
> yourself in such a scenario.

The statistically superior option is to flee the scene. #2 is to hide. As noted above, the worst possible thing you can do is try to pull a weapon.

> I guess you believe you will never have that happen to you.

Not expecting rampaging water buffalo either.

> I have already successfully defended myself with a
> handgun from an attempted entry and assault. Held
> the perp utilize police arrived over ten minutes
> later. So you can keyboard quarterback all you
> want but don't write badly about others who have
> actually been in that situation. Theory is
> wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing like
> it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is better
> than your proposal to have nothing in hand!

You've done no such thing, you transparent lying asshole. An armed intruder has the drop on you. He didn't arrive wanting to kill you -- most likely he thought nobody was home -- but if you force some him-or-you situation, he's quite prepared to make sure it's you. Reach for anything threatening and you die.

> As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for your
> family who will suffer as a result. My family is
> here today thanks to me and my gun.

I doubt that you have a family. Who would want to stay around a pathological liar?

Most intruder are not armed.

"12% of all households violently burglarized while someone was
home faced an offender armed with a firearm"


http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vdhb.pdf

.
Attachments:

Get your guns. There's a war and the enemy is Islam.

antanov Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They're calling in Russian support for this one,

Wow! Unprecedented. They're clearly expecting a huge turnout of overweight, balding, middle-aged male gun nuts at next weekend's show. My earlier hot dog & calorie estimates may turn out to be low!

more wisdom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> hyTNY Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > GN iz dumb Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > GN Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > You still did not explain how you will
> defend
> > > > yourself in such a scenario. I guess you
> > > believe
> > > > you will never have that happen to you. I
> > have
> > > > already successfully defended myself with a
> > > > handgun from an attempted entry and
> assault.
> > > Held
> > > > the perp utilize police arrived over ten
> > > minutes
> > > > later. So you can keyboard quarterback all
> > you
> > > > want but don't write badly about others who
> > > have
> > > > actually been in that situation. Theory is
> > > > wonderful to discuss but reality is nothing
> > > like
> > > > it. When seconds count, a gun in hand is
> > better
> > > > than your proposal to have nothing in hand!
>
> > > >
> > > > As far as I am concerned, I feel sorry for
> > your
> > > > family who will suffer as a result. My
> family
> > > is
> > > > here today thanks to me and my gun.
> > >
> > >
> > > That was a great story! I am so glad you were
> > able
> > > to use your coward stick in a positive manor.
> > That
> > > happens very rarely (about 1 out of 24
> times).
> > The
> > > sad thing is that in reality you are putting
> > > yourself and your family in danger by having
> a
> > gun
> > > in the house but we both already know that
> you
> > do
> > > not have the brains to realize that.
> >
> >
> > lol!
> >
> > 1 in 24 times would be a relatively high rate
> > dumbshit. With about 4 million burglaries/year
> > and about 28% being while occupied, that would
> be
> > about 1.1 million potential occupied events.
> > Using your 1 in 24 number, that would work out
> to
> > about 46,000 events/year.
> >
> > Outside of suicides by those inclined by mental
> > illness already, there is a trivial risk to
> having
> > a gun in the house. As far as deaths and the
> > numbers go, it's far below having area rugs or
> > stairs or prescription pain killers or any
> number
> > of other common items in the house.
>
>
> I think that one went right over your head. Thanks
> for proving beyond any doubt how incredibly stupid
> you are.


Yeah, I'm sorry that your argument is based on contrived bullshit, omission of relevant detail, and lack of appropriate context.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DVjpU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I said in absolute terms and to reference the
> > actual numbers. 4X squat still equals squat.
>
> The words of a pathetic asshole mean squat. Look
> it up. More than 30,000 people die from gunshot
> wounds in this country every year. Your chances
> of becoming one of those are nearly four times
> higher if you keep a gun in the home. Simple
> fact. Your chances of being murdered go up. Your
> chances of committing suicide go up. Your chances
> of being killed by an accidental gunshot go up.
> Friends and neighbors also face increased risks,
> but they aren't as high as those of you and yours.
> Despite your foolish fantasies and stupid
> self-deceits, actual criminals face virtually no
> increased risk at all.
>
> Ding, ding, ding -- special bonus! Some 200,000
> people get all shot up and scarred by gunshot
> wounds every year as well. But they manage to
> survive, thanks to very expensive medical
> treatment and often painful and difficult rehab
> programs. Your odds of enjoying a dose of all
> that go up as well when you keep a gun in the
> home. And that's all NEEDLESS RISK in exchange
> for fucking nothing. Nobody with an actual brain
> would go there.
>
> > What is the actual rate? Hint: It's relatively
> tiny.
> > Far, fer below the risk rate for many other
> common
> > causes of death in the home.
>
> Right. Here's more of that NRA swimming pool
> bullshit coming. You can see the brain-dead
> fucktards from many miles away. Just another case
> of fool-yourself stupid on your end.
>
> > Which is why you want to present the numbers on
> a relative
> > basis and not the absolute numbers. And it's
> only at that
> > tiny rate because it counts suicides which are
> N/A for the
> > vast majority.
>
> Dead is dead, goober-tard. There are no different
> degrees of it. And having a gun in the home
> increases your chances of dying from a gunshot
> wound by a factor of nearly four. And that's in
> exchange for WHAT again? Oh, that's right --
> FUCKING NOTHING.


More obfuscation and bullshit avoiding the reality of the issue.

Yeah, it goes up... From squat to virtually squat.

Of the 30,000 deaths cited about 20,000 are suicides.

Of the remaining 10,000, the vast majority are young black men shooting each other.

Accidental deaths are at trivial levels relative to just about anything at about 600 - 800/year.

So unless you're a middle-aged white guy with a history of mental illness and/or substance abuse or a 15 - 30 year old urban black male, your risk of dying by being shot are trivially small regardless whether you have a gun in the home or not. Even if you are, the numbers are small in the scheme of things which, again, is why you want to reference things in relative vs absolute terms. 4X squat = squat.

The overall average lifetime risk for dying by being shot is roughly equal to that of dying in an aviation accident.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> XYbuV Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And, as suicide is generally, it exists at
> > significant levels only among those typically
> with
> > long histories of mental illness and substance
> > abuse. A typical person has little to no risk
> of
> > suicide simply because they have a gun any more
> > than they do of hanging themselves because they
> > have rope.
>
> There's another bit of just plain asshole-level
> stupidity. The key to preventing suicide is to
> introduce delay -- time in which to rethink and
> reconsider. Guns do exactly the opposite -- they
> do a great job of assuring that a single moment of
> doubt or weakness will result in instant fatality.
> Among those who do manage to survive a near-thing
> suicide, the vast majority will tell you that it
> was a momentary and impulsive act, and that they
> are very glad to have gotten a second chance to
> live out the rest of their lives.
>
> Guns in short are a public health hazard, and
> gun-ownership is itself a sign of potential mental
> illness.


That's a bullshit line promoted by anti-gun advocates not by mental health advocates. "Normal people" don't commit suicide other than in extraordinarily rare cases and very small numbers. Normal people are not impulsive to the point of putting a barrel in their mouths. In fact, a history of clinically impulsive behavior is a primary indication for suicide. Typical suicides are not impulsive acts by persons otherwise. The vast majority of people will tell you that they regret virtually any stupid thing that they do after the fact.

And hey, gang! Let's not forget the condiments...
.
Attachments:

Guns = Death
NRA = Brain Death

Poor suckers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns = Death
> NRA = Brain Death


Deep brah... deep...

lol

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My plan would be to survive. I'm not dumb enough
> to be interested in laying down my life for the
> sake of a TV. You assholes are giving the word
> "stupid" a bad name.

I'm not saying a TV is worth killing for. But the thief may think it's worth dying over.

I'm killing over someone invading my home with the intent to do harm. I don't give a fuck if they're after a dirty sock on the floor - it's *my* sock and it's inside *my* home where no one has any business except my family.

And we will survive.

> LOL! Recon by fire. This is how you kill family
> members you lost track of Then you have to live
> with the horror of your own stupidity until such
> time as it overcomes you, and you end up killing
> yourself as well. Thank God for guns!>

If my wife is beside me in bed that's easy to check. My kid's room is next to ours and easy to check on the way to the stairs. Once I ascertain their location, anyone else is fair game to justifiably kill without hesitation. Or apology.


> Cool stuff for thieves to boost and sell. Be sure
> to put an NRA sticker on your car too, dumbfuck.

I don't have or need any such stickers, twat-for-brains. What's on your Honda?


> It was a raccoon, moron.

Raccoons don't break doorframes. Coons might, but of the two-legged variety.


> You must live in one of those neanderthal states.
> In the civilized world, your obligation is to use
> force only when other courses of action have been
> exhausted. You can get decades in prison
> otherwise.

I live locally here in Virginia. Anyone breaking into your house may be killed if you have a reasonable fear for your safety or the safety of anyone within. Just keep repeating "I was in fear for my life, it was dark and I thought he had a gun..." No muss, no fuss, and no prosecution. If you were able to read, you'd know that several cases have happened in Virginia with no charges brought against the homeowner. Ask your mommy to read to you more often.

Let me get this straight, I used my gun to defend myself and my family, at the same time capturing the perp and holding him until the Police arrived. I did not discharge my weapon and nobody was hurt. Yet you call me a coward? I don't know on what planet you were born and educated, but here in the USA on the planet Earth that is a win for everyone involved. I graduated with honors from university and have not endangered anyone as a result of my gun ownership.

You on the other hand, when presented with a real life positive use of a gun to defend life and family, resort to discounting the act and calling me names because events don't support your thinking regarding firearms.

I have provided real facts while you provide only theory and misinformed rhetoric. Then you call me delusional and stupid for not converting my stance simply because it does not fit your ideology. I respect your right to an opinion, even if it is opposite of mine. That is what America is all about. You on the other hand can't fathom any other thinking than your own misguided stance.

Gun ownership comes with many responsibilities, all taught to me by both my father and others with considerable knowledge and experience in the handling and use of guns. I hope I am never again confronted with a situation that requires me to have to use my gun. In the event I do have to use a gun, I am happy and proud that I have the choice and ability to do so.

Again, you have not provided me with any alternative to a gun in defending myself in the situation that I was in when a gun was able to address the situation and all parties survived. I am not calling you names, I only ask you to provide a real life response to resolving the situation successfully and be able to talk about it if I had not had my gun available to subdue the perp. So far you have provided nothing! The same thing you will have in your hands to defend yourself.

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> You on the other hand, when presented with a real
> life positive use of a gun to defend life and
> family, resort to discounting the act and calling
> me names because events don't support your
> thinking regarding firearms.


Yes. I'm an Asshole...

What you just said is very true and makes perfect sense, with that being said, you wasted your time explaining this to a bunch of basement living pansies that spend their days eating their happy meals in 3 day old underwear.

You question the validity of the event that I described? Fine with me as it actually happened regardless of whether you believe me or not.

You write "You've done no such thing, you transparent lying asshole"

I am not a lying asshole but you are welcome to your opinion, wrong as it is.

You also write "I doubt that you have a family. Who would want to stay around a pathological liar?"

I do have a family. Here too you are wrong, but I do believe you don't care about the truth, only your own concept of what the utopian world should be. Any other concept that falls outside of your own beliefs you consider a lie, wrong, and to never have happened.

In regards to the comments about not being able to defend against intruders, wasn't there a young boy who defended himself against several intruders with a handgun this past summer when they attempted to enter the home? It was on the news. I guess that didn't happen either in your opinion.

Best of luck to you if you ever get in that situation.

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You question the validity of the event that I
> described? Fine with me as it actually happened
> regardless of whether you believe me or not.
>
> You write "You've done no such thing, you
> transparent lying asshole"
>
> I am not a lying asshole but you are welcome to
> your opinion, wrong as it is.
>
> You also write "I doubt that you have a family.
> Who would want to stay around a pathological
> liar?"
>
> I do have a family. Here too you are wrong, but I
> do believe you don't care about the truth, only
> your own concept of what the utopian world should
> be. Any other concept that falls outside of your
> own beliefs you consider a lie, wrong, and to
> never have happened.
>
> In regards to the comments about not being able to
> defend against intruders, wasn't there a young boy
> who defended himself against several intruders
> with a handgun this past summer when they
> attempted to enter the home? It was on the news. I
> guess that didn't happen either in your opinion.
>
> Best of luck to you if you ever get in that
> situation.


You still don't seem to get the fact that you are being trolled and you are falling for it like a retard.

dyKUd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The overall average lifetime risk for dying by
> being shot is roughly equal to that of dying in an
> aviation accident.

LOL! The number of deaths in commercial airline accidents in a typical year would be zero. Meanwhile 30,000 people die every year from gunshot wounds. It's hilarious how stupid a gun fetish can make people.

KVCu3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's a bullshit line promoted by anti-gun
> advocates not by mental health advocates. "Normal
> people" don't commit suicide other than in
> extraordinarily rare cases and very small numbers.

One assfuck claims that suicides should be disregarded and that the numbers are very large. The next one claims that suicides should be disregarded and that the numbers are very small. 1 assfuck + 1 assfuck = 2 assfucks.

> Normal people are not impulsive to the point of
> putting a barrel in their mouths.

Of course they do, assfuck. You just try to Monday-morning-quarterback them all into mental cases because they did. That's just one more reason to believe that you are a mindless assfuck.

Lifetime NRA member Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am sick an tire of all yall makin fun of gun
> owners. Guns make you smarter not dummer. My daddy
> once shot a black guy caus he was tryin ta steal
> some of our stuff. He got charged with a hate
> crime caus the guy was black. My daddy didnt even
> kill him or nothin. My daddy fired a warning shot
> into his leg. My daddy got 7 years an 6 months.


Thanks for posting that. You help show what the NRA is all about. God bless.

more wisdom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lifetime NRA member Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am sick an tire of all yall makin fun of gun
> > owners. Guns make you smarter not dummer. My
> daddy
> > once shot a black guy caus he was tryin ta
> steal
> > some of our stuff. He got charged with a hate
> > crime caus the guy was black. My daddy didnt
> even
> > kill him or nothin. My daddy fired a warning
> shot
> > into his leg. My daddy got 7 years an 6 months.
>
>
> Thanks for posting that. You help show what the
> NRA is all about. God bless.

Talking to yourself must be boring. Get a life.

Another Worthless Guntard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm not saying a TV is worth killing for.

Yes, you are. You are saying that a dirty sock is worth killing for. Get a fucking grip.

> I'm killing over someone invading my home with the
> intent to do harm.

LOL! You aren't waiting to see what anyone's intent is. Which is why your mindless recon by fire will end up killing someone by mistake.

> I live locally here in Virginia. Anyone breaking
> into your house may be killed if you have a
> reasonable fear for your safety or the safety of
> anyone within.

No, a JURY must believe that your fear was reasonable and that your behavior was justifiable. Blasting away at the first thing that moves will be a tough fit. Your perverted stupidity will not enter into anything except the big stretch in the big house that you will end up being sentenced to. Hope you like bologna sandwiches.

PS. Your guns do not mark you as big and special. They mark you as small and insignificant. They are in fact proof that you yourself realize just how small and insignificant you are.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another Worthless Guntard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm not saying a TV is worth killing for.
>
> Yes, you are. You are saying that a dirty sock is
> worth killing for. Get a fucking grip.
>
> > I'm killing over someone invading my home with
> the
> > intent to do harm.
>
> LOL! You aren't waiting to see what anyone's
> intent is. Which is why your mindless recon by
> fire will end up killing someone by mistake.
>
> > I live locally here in Virginia. Anyone
> breaking
> > into your house may be killed if you have a
> > reasonable fear for your safety or the safety
> of
> > anyone within.
>
> No, a JURY must believe that your fear was
> reasonable and that your behavior was justifiable.
> Blasting away at the first thing that moves will
> be a tough fit. Your perverted stupidity will not
> enter into anything except the big stretch in the
> big house that you will end up being sentenced to.
> Hope you like bologna sandwiches.
>
> PS. Your guns do not mark you as big and special.
> They mark you as small and insignificant. They
> are in fact proof that you yourself realize just
> how small and insignificant you are.


No charges filed, no jury. Wise up and put down that bottle.

GN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let me get this straight...

Your story reeks of fantasy. You may have told and retold it often enough online to have come to believe that it is true, but even if it were, it would be no more than a remote and insignificant outlier. The facts are that trying to pull a weapon on an armed intruder is the worst possible thing you can do.

> Again, you have not provided me with any
> alternative to a gun in defending myself in the
> situation that I was in...

Already explained was the simple fact that leaving the scene is the #1 option on the board. Cut out the back, run to the neighbors, and call 911. If you can't get to an exit for some reason, the #2 option is to hide somewhere and be very quiet.

BloombergsBodyguard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No charges filed, no jury. Wise up and put down that bottle.

Charges will be filed. There is no general right to kill people anywhere in Virginia. It is only the tiniest fraction of uber-justifiable and way out of the mainstream events that are not prosecuted. Swagger-boy will be going down hard.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BloombergsBodyguard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No charges filed, no jury. Wise up and put down
> that bottle.
>
> Charges will be filed. There is no general right
> to kill people anywhere in Virginia. It is only
> the tiniest fraction of uber-justifiable and way
> out of the mainstream events that are not
> prosecuted. Swagger-boy will be going down hard.

I'll be watching for the newspaper articles. Meanwhile, you have some homework to do.

ISIS is after all of us. I am afraid the DC area will be hit soon. I think owning a gun might be the right way to go. I am avoiding the Metro, malls, and movies theaters.

Well.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ISIS is after all of us. I am afraid the DC area
> will be hit soon. I think owning a gun might be
> the right way to go. I am avoiding the Metro,
> malls, and movies theaters.

Definitely. Living in fear is the way to go for sure. One of our local gun nuts - Dane Bramage - fantasizes that ISIS will attack his house, and that he'll fend them off with his gun collection.

You can't make this stuff up!

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another Worthless Guntard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm not saying a TV is worth killing for.
>
> Yes, you are. You are saying that a dirty sock is
> worth killing for. Get a fucking grip.
>
> > I'm killing over someone invading my home with
> the
> > intent to do harm.
>
> LOL! You aren't waiting to see what anyone's
> intent is. Which is why your mindless recon by
> fire will end up killing someone by mistake.
>
> > I live locally here in Virginia. Anyone
> breaking
> > into your house may be killed if you have a
> > reasonable fear for your safety or the safety
> of
> > anyone within.
>
> No, a JURY must believe that your fear was
> reasonable and that your behavior was justifiable.
> Blasting away at the first thing that moves will
> be a tough fit. Your perverted stupidity will not
> enter into anything except the big stretch in the
> big house that you will end up being sentenced to.
> Hope you like bologna sandwiches.
>
> PS. Your guns do not mark you as big and special.
> They mark you as small and insignificant. They
> are in fact proof that you yourself realize just
> how small and insignificant you are.
Attachments:

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Let me get this straight...
>
> Your story reeks of fantasy. You may have told
> and retold it often enough online to have come to
> believe that it is true, but even if it were, it
> would be no more than a remote and insignificant
> outlier. The facts are that trying to pull a
> weapon on an armed intruder is the worst possible
> thing you can do.
>
> > Again, you have not provided me with any
> > alternative to a gun in defending myself in the
> > situation that I was in...
>
> Already explained was the simple fact that leaving
> the scene is the #1 option on the board. Cut out
> the back, run to the neighbors, and call 911. If
> you can't get to an exit for some reason, the #2
> option is to hide somewhere and be very quiet.

Limp-wristed faggot libtard brings the LoLz!!!

BloombergsBodyguard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'll be watching for the newspaper articles.
> Meanwhile, you have some homework to do.

Homework? Hahahahaha! What a pathetic ass. We don't have killing zones in Virginia. You blow someone away without a really strong basis for it, you'll be doing a dose of very hard time. With a bunch of other disgusting pricks.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BloombergsBodyguard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'll be watching for the newspaper articles.
> > Meanwhile, you have some homework to do.
>
> Homework? Hahahahaha! What a pathetic ass. We
> don't have killing zones in Virginia. You blow
> someone away without a really strong basis for it,
> you'll be doing a dose of very hard time. With a
> bunch of other disgusting pricks.
Attachments:

Libtardz!!! LoLz!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Limp-wristed faggot libtard brings the LoLz!!!

Gee, another pee-in-your-pants reply. Who needs any more evidence that the gun-nuts are just a bunch of small wee-wee morons?

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dyKUd Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The overall average lifetime risk for dying by
> > being shot is roughly equal to that of dying in
> an
> > aviation accident.
>
> LOL! The number of deaths in commercial airline
> accidents in a typical year would be zero.
> Meanwhile 30,000 people die every year from
> gunshot wounds. It's hilarious how stupid a gun
> fetish can make people.


The 20,000 suicides and 10,000 homicides (somewhere between 6,000 to 8,000 restricted to young black males), are not comparable events to accidental death as I was addressing. Aviation deaths include many/most not involving commercial airline accidents. About 500/year. When there are one or more large commercial airline accidents that will greatly increase those numbers. On a lifetime average basis, the odds of dying in such an accident work out to about 1:8,000. The odds of dying as a result of an unintentional gun shot is about 1:7,000.

It's more funny how ideology can blind people to objective facts.

Your fantasy of some high degree of risk and likelihood of death or injury represented simply by the presence of a gun in the home in the case of the average person is just that - a ideology-driven fantasy.

The 20,000 suicides are not a risk to the typical gun owner since normal people do not commit suicide other than in tiny numbers. In keeping with your general practice of omitting context, you attempt to twist the facts re suicide to fit anti-gun advocacy. You conflate impulsive aspects of a single event at a given time outside of the context of what is in +95% of cases a larger history of mental issues, clinical depression, and long-term substance abuse. What impulsive element does exist is within that context, NOT within the context of simple impulsive behavior by normal individuals across the larger population.

Likewise, you attempt to present the 10,000 homicides as generally applicable risk across all of the population. That's not the case. Unless you are a young black male involved in criminal activities and/or living in a high risk urban area affected by such persons, then you bear little to none of the associated risk.

In terms of broader risk that leaves us with about some 2,000 - 4,000 intentional risk events which are applicable across the larger population who may have a gun in the home. Of those somewhere between 500 - 1,500 are justifiable/excusable homicides which are by definition justified. The remainder combined with the relatively trivial 600-ish number of unintentional deaths/year is the more realistic risk. Which again in the scheme of things is tiny and dwarfed by any number of more common risks to the average person.

The above is borne out by the realities of numbers. If there actually were such a great risk as you present it then given the numbers of guns and households with guns there would be (at least) an order of magnitude greater number of associated deaths across the broader population. There are not. Sorry for your loss.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well.... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ISIS is after all of us. I am afraid the DC
> area
> > will be hit soon. I think owning a gun might be
> > the right way to go. I am avoiding the Metro,
> > malls, and movies theaters.
>
> Definitely. Living in fear is the way to go for
> sure. One of our local gun nuts - Dane Bramage -
> fantasizes that ISIS will attack his house, and
> that he'll fend them off with his gun collection.
>
>
> You can't make this stuff up!


Pro gun people are fun to ridicule and yes they are ignorant as hell. What really pisses me off is the 229 billion dollars a year that American taxpayers have to shell out for gun violence. These guntards are often the same people that complain about the cost of welfare. We all pay out the ass for their childish hobby.

http://www.businessinsider.com/gun-violence-costs-america-more-than-229-billion-every-year-2015-4

Moe info Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kilton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Well.... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ISIS is after all of us. I am afraid the DC
> > area
> > > will be hit soon. I think owning a gun might
> be
> > > the right way to go. I am avoiding the Metro,
> > > malls, and movies theaters.
> >
> > Definitely. Living in fear is the way to go for
> > sure. One of our local gun nuts - Dane Bramage
> -
> > fantasizes that ISIS will attack his house, and
> > that he'll fend them off with his gun
> collection.
> >
> >
> > You can't make this stuff up!
>
>
> Pro gun people are fun to ridicule and yes they
> are ignorant as hell. What really pisses me off is
> the 229 billion dollars a year that American
> taxpayers have to shell out for gun violence.
> These guntards are often the same people that
> complain about the cost of welfare. We all pay out
> the ass for their childish hobby.
>
> http://www.businessinsider.com/gun-violence-costs-
> america-more-than-229-billion-every-year-2015-4


"according to a new report released by Mother Jones"

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha. I bet you make fun of FoxNews and then come here with this bullshit.

Moe info Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Pro gun people are fun to ridicule and yes they
> are ignorant as hell. What really pisses me off is
> the 229 billion dollars a year that American
> taxpayers have to shell out for gun violence.
> These guntards are often the same people that
> complain about the cost of welfare. We all pay out
> the ass for their childish hobby.

Thank God for hobbies!

http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/11/16/13-year-old-homeschooler-shoots-kills-felon-home-invasion/

So for the first time in my life I put one of my guns in my car. It has a trigger lock, loaded mags in different area, and lock key with me.

I really don't feel as comfortable as I did before the Paris attack. They warned us before 9/11 and we did not really pay attention. My mom watched the plane that hit the Pentagon track up 395 from Shirlington outside at a dogpark with the thought "that is not a normal flight route?"

I worry about the MD & VA burbs. The malls, the schools, sporting events. along with DC. I hope I am wrong.

White knuckles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So for the first time in my life I put one of my
> guns in my car. It has a trigger lock, loaded mags
> in different area, and lock key with me.
>
> I really don't feel as comfortable as I did before
> the Paris attack. They warned us before 9/11 and
> we did not really pay attention. My mom watched
> the plane that hit the Pentagon track up 395 from
> Shirlington outside at a dogpark with the thought
> "that is not a normal flight route?"
>
> I worry about the MD & VA burbs. The malls, the
> schools, sporting events. along with DC. I hope I
> am wrong.

As long as Rushern Baker is the PG County Executive we can all sleep soundly.
He's a graduate of the Marion Barry School of Ethics.

I have 10,000 rounds of 5.56 nato coming to my home. I get all my groceries using Giants peapod service. I never leave the house, I know its coming soon.

I set up a .22 shooting range in my basement so I can make sure my shooting skills stay excellent.

hnMV9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's more funny how ideology can blind people to
> objective facts.

You mean how these ridiculous gun-tard assholes try to "play pretend" and come up with reasons why certain gun-related deaths shouldn't count as gun-related deaths? Yeah, it's just pathetic. What a bunch of worthless trolls these people are.

> Your fantasy of some high degree of risk and
> likelihood of death or injury represented simply
> by the presence of a gun in the home in the case
> of the average person is just that - a
> ideology-driven fantasy.

Wake up, Cletus. It's simple fact. The closer you are to guns, the more likely you are to die as the result of one. Even you should be able to process that. If you have a gun in your home, your odds of dying from a gunshot wound are nearly four times greater than if you did not have a gun in your home.

> The 20,000 suicides are not a risk to the typical
> gun owner since normal people do not commit suicide
> other than in tiny numbers.

There you go again! Happens like clockwork. Only the deaths of whatever YOU consider to be "normal people" can be counted. Pay close attention here ASSHOLE: Nobody at all deserves to die for the sake of your psychological shortcomings and pathetic little play-acting hobby. NOBODY AT ALL! Got that, you contemptible little cretin?

> The above is borne out by the realities of numbers.

Since you apparently lack the capacity to have grasped them the first, second, or third time around, let me point out again that what is borne out by the numbers is that 30,000 people die from gunshot wounds every year. Another 200,000 or so are shot up and scarred but manage to survive thanks in large part to the waste of very expensive medical talent and resources that gets devoted to treating injuries that never should have occurred to begin with, thereby directly contributing to rising health care costs for the rest of us. Maybe we need to start sending the bills for all this mayhem over to your house. The rest of us are getting kind of tired of paying for all this crap.

> Sorry for your loss.

Sorry you're so fucking stupid. Then again, you're a gun-tard. Can't expect anything BUT fucking stupid from a gun-tard.

White knuckles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So for the first time in my life I put one of my
> guns in my car. It has a trigger lock, loaded mags
> in different area, and lock key with me.

For what purpose! I keep a loaded .45 in my console with two full mags beside it.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> hnMV9 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's more funny how ideology can blind people
> to
> > objective facts.
>
> You mean how these ridiculous gun-tard assholes
> try to "play pretend" and come up with reasons why
> certain gun-related deaths shouldn't count as
> gun-related deaths? Yeah, it's just pathetic.
> What a bunch of worthless trolls these people are.


Uh, no. It's like how they have little to nothing to do with the risk of having a gun in the home for the vast majority of people as you tried to inappropriately use the numbers.


> > Your fantasy of some high degree of risk and
> > likelihood of death or injury represented
> simply
> > by the presence of a gun in the home in the
> case
> > of the average person is just that - a
> > ideology-driven fantasy.
>
> Wake up, Cletus. It's simple fact. The closer
> you are to guns, the more likely you are to die as
> the result of one. Even you should be able to
> process that. If you have a gun in your home,
> your odds of dying from a gunshot wound are nearly
> four times greater than if you did not have a gun
> in your home.
>

No, they aren't actually.

First of all, your 4X number is bullshit based on a study that was long ago debunked as you're intending to use it which the author doesn't even try to defend for such purposes. But it made it's way into the canned anti-gun nut talking points so uninformed ideologues like you can't let it go and continue to parrot it.

In fact, the study you're citing was based on a very small sample and counted the presence of a gun in the home even if that gun wasn't involved in the associated death. It also counted guns in or *around* the home, not necessarily even those possessed by anyone living there. i.e., If someone drove to the home and shot somebody, it was counted.

What you also don't know is that it was part of a larger study by the same author which, in addition to guns, also ranked various other factors as indicators of risk. That included such "risky" things like living in an apartment, living alone, alcohol consumption, etc. All of which were cited as greater risks than a gun. In fact, guns ranked well down the list. lol

Last, as before, you dumb "4X" number is meaningless with no basis for the multiplier provided. Even in the source study, the actual risk at 4X the base it still was small.


> > The 20,000 suicides are not a risk to the
> typical
> > gun owner since normal people do not commit
> suicide
> > other than in tiny numbers.
>
> There you go again! Happens like clockwork. Only
> the deaths of whatever YOU consider to be "normal
> people" can be counted. Pay close attention here
> ASSHOLE: Nobody at all deserves to die for the
> sake of your psychological shortcomings and
> pathetic little play-acting hobby. NOBODY AT ALL!
> Got that, you contemptible little cretin?


Nope, they just have little to do with the typical individual gun owner. They represent a particular group and are atypical in the opinion of mental health professionals, not just in my opinion.

Normal people do not attempt or commit suicide simply because they have a gun. Just as they don't hang themselves because they have rope. Or asphyxiate themselves because they have a car in the garage. Or feel compelled to jump from the roof of their building. Or (intentionally anyway) OD on opiate pain killers.

>
> > The above is borne out by the realities of
> numbers.
>
> Since you apparently lack the capacity to have
> grasped them the first, second, or third time
> around, let me point out again that what is borne
> out by the numbers is that 30,000 people die from
> gunshot wounds every year. Another 200,000 or so
> are shot up and scarred but manage to survive
> thanks in large part to the waste of very
> expensive medical talent and resources that gets
> devoted to treating injuries that never should
> have occurred to begin with, thereby directly
> contributing to rising health care costs for the
> rest of us. Maybe we need to start sending the
> bills for all this mayhem over to your house. The
> rest of us are getting kind of tired of paying for
> all this crap.
>
> > Sorry for your loss.
>
> Sorry you're so fucking stupid. Then again,
> you're a gun-tard. Can't expect anything BUT
> fucking stupid from a gun-tard.


lol. Don't be mad cause I called you on your bullshit.

What I said is exactly right. If there were in fact some large risk as you claim simply due to the presence of a gun, then the numbers necessarily would be many times greater just by math. They also would be more evenly distributed across the population and not limited to the more specific groups of individuals as they are. But since objective analysis doesn't support your cause, you have to rely on bs like citing the 30,000 without distinction hoping that nobody will notice and crap like your "4X" number instead of citing an actual rate.

Again, sorry for your loss.

I have a gun on my coffee table 6 feet away. It hasn't jumped up and shot me yet. I guess I should keep an eye on it. Those guns are sneaky.

...
Attachments:

Media Matters is in the house!

Best propaganda foreign money can buy.

Yawn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Media Matters is in the house!
>
> Best propaganda foreign money can buy.

Media Matters is Soros funded. Soros has armed bodyguards.

Has there ever been a shooting at one of these gun shows?

wonder ing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Has there ever been a shooting at one of these gun
> shows?


All the fucking time.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=shootings+at+American+gun+shows

Don't know where you got your numbers but the national average is one per month at Gun shows. Meanwhile 33,600 people were killed in automobile crashes last year in the U.S.. So tell me again how dangerous gun shows are.

Vxcyc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uh, no. It's like how they have little to nothing
> to do with the risk of having a gun in the home
> for the vast majority of people as you tried to
> inappropriately use the numbers.

Uh YES, you worthless and degraded guntard asshole. Gun-related deaths are gun-related deaths. It's THAT simple. But you spend your cretin-time trying to explain them away. As if they didn't happen or didn't happen to people who matter to you. Such insanity is just another habit of poorly-balanced guntard assholes. Another aspect of being terminally skewed and stupid.

> No, they aren't actually. First of all, your 4X number
> is bullshit based on a study that was long ago debunked...

LOL! There are many studies, you massive El Dopo, and they all show the very same thing. Sure, you can toss out the rat-crap nonsense that the NRA puts out, but one independent study after another has shown the same effect and in nearly the same degree. The simple facts of the matter -- facts that the comic-book brains of low-brow guntards are too poorly wired to grasp and face up to -- are that having a gun in the home puts you at GREATER risk, NOT LESS. There is no serious debate of the matter. Just the babbling ignorance of guntard assholes.

> If someone drove to the home and shot somebody, it
> was counted.

So if someone drives to your home and fatally shoots you, it is not a gun-related death? Your efforts to exclude the painfully obvious evidence against your silly claims grow ever more absurdly strained and ridiculous. A normal person would be ashamed of posts like yours.

> All of which were cited as greater risks than a
> gun. In fact, guns ranked well down the list. lol

For the Nth time, you witless stooge, IT DOES NOT MATTER if there are greater risks in the world. The focus is on THIS risk (quite a needless one, by the way), and the FACTS are that a person who keeps a gun in the home is nearly four times as likely to end up dead as the result of a gunshot wound. End of story. Even if your "source" were correct in its rankings, it would not be relevant. You might as well start claiming that the risks of heart disease are a reason to ignore all the death, injury, and human suffering that your pathetic little phony tough-guy toys result in.

> Last, as before, you dumb "4X" number is
> meaningless with no basis for the multiplier
> provided. Even in the source study, the actual
> risk at 4X the base it still was small.

30,000 annual deaths and 200,000 annual injuries serious enough to require treatment in an ER are NOT SMALL, except of course in the tiny minds of denier guntard assholes. Meanwhile, the multiplier that you math-whizzes have such trouble with is merely an expression of the difference in rates of death from gunshot wounds among those who keep a gun in the home versus those who are smart enough not to. Read 'em and weep, guntard.

> Normal people do not attempt or commit suicide
> simply because they have a gun.

Such an utter dope! Suicide is a problem across society in general. People don't ATTEMPT suicide because they have a gun. They SUCCEED at it because they have a gun, as anyone but some maladroit mindless guntard asshole would have immediately recognized as the point of the matter. Guns greatly reduce the amount of time and effort involved in suicide while greatly increasing the chances of its success. Both of those are BAD THINGS, as I will certainly need to point out to just another garden-variety warped-brain guntard asshole.

> Don't be mad cause I called you on your bullshit.

Dream on, you ignorant NRA stooge! Facts are facts, and you don't have any of them. Meanwhile, it is an undeniable fact that your wonderful guns will end up killing perhaps another 85-90 people today, while severely wounding a further 550-600. The ER community will once again be busy, occupied in throwing expensive talent and resources at yet another wave of pointless death and trauma. Nice fucking work, you miserable little asshole.

> What I said is exactly right. If there were in
> fact some large risk as you claim simply due to
> the presence of a gun, then the numbers necessarily
> would be many times greater just by math.

You don't understand math either. Know your limits, dumbfuck! Keeping a gun in the home increases your chances of dying from a gunshot wound by a factor of nearly four. It's what happens. You can't wish it away.

> Again, sorry for your loss.

I can't hear you through all the smothering of your stupid-ass claims that's been done here. You have no answer or explanation at all for ANY of the needless death and agony that guns directly cause in our society every single day. You desperately want to pretend that it's not there, but all you have to work with is your store of asswipe-ignorant claims and fables. You're just a pathetic guntard dopester asshole, cowering in the corner in hopes of avoiding a confrontation with the plain and simple truth of your personal culpability for all this gun-related damage. You won't be winning any prizes here or anywhere else with a rap sheet as tainted and disgraceful as that.

the promoters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't know where you got your numbers but the
> national average is one per month at Gun shows.
> Meanwhile 33,600 people were killed in automobile
> crashes last year in the U.S.. So tell me again
> how dangerous gun shows are.

What percentage of deaths from automobile crashes occurred while driving to or from a gun show? What percentage of them was associated with an over-consumption of hot dogs?

Damn! The pro gun guys have gotten their asses kicked in this thread!

I own one gun but I dont care for these gun show guys. They are weird!

I really want to rent one of the oscar meyer weinermobiles but they wont rent me one. I would totally pay a couple hundred a day and buy my own gas.
Attachments:

It's not what you think Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> isbs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Somebody around here isn't familiar with the 2nd
> Amendment.
>
> The 2nd Amendment was part of the slave
> compromises necessary to get enough states to
> ratify the Constitution. What it does is promise
> that Congress will not try to end slavery by
> disarming state militias in the slave-holding
> states. Those armed militias were the first (and
> only) line of defense that stood between southern
> whites and the much-feared barbarism of a slave
> uprising.

Hey, it's yet another liberal making crap up about the 2nd amendment, which is pretty damned clear. Go DIAF liberal. You are stupid.

Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows. It's just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest tactical outfits.

The Hotdog Gala Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows. It's
> just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest
> tactical outfits.


I would go if the wienermobile was there.

casual observer7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn! The pro gun guys have gotten their asses
> kicked in this thread!


#threadselfie

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vxcyc Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Uh, no. It's like how they have little to
> nothing
> > to do with the risk of having a gun in the home
> > for the vast majority of people as you tried to
> > inappropriately use the numbers.
>
> Uh YES, you worthless and degraded guntard
> asshole. Gun-related deaths are gun-related
> deaths. It's THAT simple. But you spend your
> cretin-time trying to explain them away. As if
> they didn't happen or didn't happen to people who
> matter to you. Such insanity is just another
> habit of poorly-balanced guntard assholes.
> Another aspect of being terminally skewed and
> stupid.


Once again with the bullshit obfuscation. No dummy, it's not that simple and gun deaths are not all equal to be lumped together in terms of risk of having a gun in the home. Which was the matter at hand.

The 20,000 suicide deaths generally do not apply to the larger population in Neither do the 6,000 - 8,000 homicides by young urban black men beyond that group. So even if you want to try to count risk in that bullshit way, then the more appropriate number to use would be in the range of 3,000 - 5,000 including intentional and unintentional deaths. Which works out to a trivial risk rate.


>
> > No, they aren't actually. First of all, your 4X
> number
> > is bullshit based on a study that was long ago
> debunked...
>
> LOL! There are many studies, you massive El Dopo,
> and they all show the very same thing. Sure, you
> can toss out the rat-crap nonsense that the NRA
> puts out, but one independent study after another
> has shown the same effect and in nearly the same
> degree. The simple facts of the matter -- facts
> that the comic-book brains of low-brow guntards
> are too poorly wired to grasp and face up to --
> are that having a gun in the home puts you at
> GREATER risk, NOT LESS. There is no serious
> debate of the matter. Just the babbling ignorance
> of guntard assholes.
>


No, in fact, that's exactly what you are doing. And even you know that your 4X bullshit with no basis is bullshit.

Yeah, post the source of your "4X" number. Any of them. All will show that the absolute risk is relatively tiny. 4X squat still is squat. And that's why you have to try to slip the stupid "4X"-type bullshit by to begin with. lol


> > If someone drove to the home and shot somebody,
> it
> > was counted.
>
> So if someone drives to your home and fatally
> shoots you, it is not a gun-related death? Your
> efforts to exclude the painfully obvious evidence
> against your silly claims grow ever more absurdly
> strained and ridiculous. A normal person would be
> ashamed of posts like yours.


It has nothing to do with the risk of a gun in the home. Which again was the matter in question per your "4X" bullshit number.


>
> > All of which were cited as greater risks than a
>
> > gun. In fact, guns ranked well down the list.
> lol
>
> For the Nth time, you witless stooge, IT DOES NOT
> MATTER if there are greater risks in the world.
> The focus is on THIS risk (quite a needless one,
> by the way), and the FACTS are that a person who
> keeps a gun in the home is nearly four times as
> likely to end up dead as the result of a gunshot
> wound. End of story. Even if your "source" were
> correct in its rankings, it would not be relevant.
> You might as well start claiming that the risks
> of heart disease are a reason to ignore all the
> death, injury, and human suffering that your
> pathetic little phony tough-guy toys result in.
>
> > Last, as before, you dumb "4X" number is
> > meaningless with no basis for the multiplier
> > provided. Even in the source study, the actual
> > risk at 4X the base it still was small.
>
> 30,000 annual deaths and 200,000 annual injuries
> serious enough to require treatment in an ER are
> NOT SMALL, except of course in the tiny minds of
> denier guntard assholes. Meanwhile, the
> multiplier that you math-whizzes have such trouble
> with is merely an expression of the difference in
> rates of death from gunshot wounds among those who
> keep a gun in the home versus those who are smart
> enough not to. Read 'em and weep, guntard.


Actually it's directly and very relevant to the mater of what risk exists as you claimed. "4X" tells you nothing with respect to the actual level of risk without a basis for what is being multiplied. 4X 0.0000001 = .0000004. i.e., Effectively none. Your bullshit otherwise doesn't change that fact. Mostly it says that you can't effectively argue the point so you have to post a bunch of bullshit. lol


>
> > Normal people do not attempt or commit suicide
> > simply because they have a gun.
>
> Such an utter dope! Suicide is a problem across
> society in general. People don't ATTEMPT suicide
> because they have a gun. They SUCCEED at it
> because they have a gun, as anyone but some
> maladroit mindless guntard asshole would have
> immediately recognized as the point of the matter.
> Guns greatly reduce the amount of time and effort
> involved in suicide while greatly increasing the
> chances of its success. Both of those are BAD
> THINGS, as I will certainly need to point out to
> just another garden-variety warped-brain guntard
> asshole.
>


Again you're confused dummy. If one doesn't attempt suicide, then there can be no success. Normal people (i.e., the vast majority) do not attempt suicide so they do not commit suicide by any method.

Furthermore, the various levels of success for suicide methods do not reflect absolute efficacy. The variance in the numbers primarily reflects very high numbers of para-suicides and pseudo-suicides by the less committed. Which is why by cutting and by drugs are so low, not that they are not effective when done right. Any given individual can kill themselves perfectly well by hanging, jumping, or with opiod pain killers. Just as they do in the case of the latter about 20,000 times/year. Because most are counted as accidents doesn't change the efficacy of the method. The rates of suicide by poisoning are low only because is because we have 100,000s of teenage girls who try to "commit suicide" because their boyfriend broke up with them by eating 10 tylenol.


> > Don't be mad cause I called you on your
> bullshit.
>
> Dream on, you ignorant NRA stooge! Facts are
> facts, and you don't have any of them. Meanwhile,
> it is an undeniable fact that your wonderful guns
> will end up killing perhaps another 85-90 people
> today, while severely wounding a further 550-600.
> The ER community will once again be busy, occupied
> in throwing expensive talent and resources at yet
> another wave of pointless death and trauma. Nice
> fucking work, you miserable little asshole.
>


^ That's why I'm presenting facts and you're left to try to bullshit your way though with crap like this. lmao


> > What I said is exactly right. If there were in
> > fact some large risk as you claim simply due to
> > the presence of a gun, then the numbers
> necessarily
> > would be many times greater just by math.
>
> You don't understand math either. Know your
> limits, dumbfuck! Keeping a gun in the home
> increases your chances of dying from a gunshot
> wound by a factor of nearly four. It's what
> happens. You can't wish it away.
>


Give me an actual rate and we can do the math. Is that so hard? Is there something that you're trying to hide by continuing to cite the number only on a relative basis?


> > Again, sorry for your loss.
>
> I can't hear you through all the smothering of
> your stupid-ass claims that's been done here. You
> have no answer or explanation at all for ANY of
> the needless death and agony that guns directly
> cause in our society every single day. You
> desperately want to pretend that it's not there,
> but all you have to work with is your store of
> asswipe-ignorant claims and fables. You're just a
> pathetic guntard dopester asshole, cowering in the
> corner in hopes of avoiding a confrontation with
> the plain and simple truth of your personal
> culpability for all this gun-related damage. You
> won't be winning any prizes here or anywhere else
> with a rap sheet as tainted and disgraceful as
> that.


So much effort and so many words to get nowhere and say nothing. It's like watching a fat kid dog paddling. lmao!

Again, sorry for your loss.

The Hotdog Gala Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows. It's
> just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest
> tactical outfits.

Fully concur!

toe jamb driver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I really want to rent one of the oscar meyer
> weinermobiles but they wont rent me one. I would
> totally pay a couple hundred a day and buy my own
> gas.

Dude, I wouldn't recommend it. If you drive that thing within 5 miles of the gun show, a stampede of fatties will be chasing you down route 28 like you wouldn't believe. Be safe - don't do it!

casual observer7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn! The pro gun guys have gotten their asses
> kicked in this thread!


Yeah, it happens every time.

Damn, the Gun Haters have been pummeled to submission on this site. Too bad they can't comprehend their ignorance!

Thanks for the reminder OP. I didn't have it on my calendar. And perfect timing considering the refugee terrorists are on the way.

aloha snackbar and 72 virgins await.

glock block Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> casual observer7 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Damn! The pro gun guys have gotten their asses
> > kicked in this thread!
>
>
> Yeah, it happens every time.


Sure does.

Get your guns. Ragheads are coming. It's going to get ugly for them and their libtard sympathizers.
Attachments:

Piss on Muslims Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get your guns. Ragheads are coming. It's going to
> get ugly for them and their libtard sympathizers.


^^^^ Perfect example of a cowardly bitch who has to hide behind a gun^^^^




Guntard pussy's lol!

I was going to go and buy a few guns at the gun show. Then some raging, angry libfag on FFU said that would make me a coward and called everyone assholes and that changed my mind. Now, I completely trust the police to protect me and the criminals to be nice to me. How can anyone withstand the withering pretzel logic and 3rd grade insults from the libfag? I have turned all my guns over to random black folk because I see how I was really just a coward and loved to buy guns only because of a hotdog fetish. The libfag told me so.

B52 Joe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was going to go and buy a few guns at the gun
> show. Then some raging, angry libfag on FFU said
> that would make me a coward and called everyone
> assholes and that changed my mind. Now, I
> completely trust the police to protect me and the
> criminals to be nice to me. How can anyone
> withstand the withering pretzel logic and 3rd
> grade insults from the libfag? I have turned all
> my guns over to random black folk because I see
> how I was really just a coward and loved to buy
> guns only because of a hotdog fetish. The libfag
> told me so.

The one thing you learn in a firefight is the only gun you need is the one you have at that moment. Any more is just baggage. Otherwise don't get hit by a car or have a heart attack.

A few guns? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> B52 Joe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I was going to go and buy a few guns at the gun
> > show. Then some raging, angry libfag on FFU
> said
> > that would make me a coward and called everyone
> > assholes and that changed my mind. Now, I
> > completely trust the police to protect me and
> the
> > criminals to be nice to me. How can anyone
> > withstand the withering pretzel logic and 3rd
> > grade insults from the libfag? I have turned
> all
> > my guns over to random black folk because I see
> > how I was really just a coward and loved to buy
> > guns only because of a hotdog fetish. The
> libfag
> > told me so.
>
> The one thing you learn in a firefight is the only
> gun you need is the one you have at that moment.
> Any more is just baggage. Otherwise don't get hit
> by a car or have a heart attack.


Navy SEALS carry at least 4 weapons on every mission. Sometimes 5 (grenade launcher). STFU.

I have like 19 guns. I rub my tiny dick all over them and dream of shooting them.

gun owner Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have like 19 guns. I rub my tiny dick all over
> them and dream of shooting them.


Why are you dreaming of shooting them. Go out to a gun range and actually shoot them. Dick size doesn't have anything to do with it so you can leave the word 'tiny' out of your posts in the future. I have a very large penis and own several guns. However, I don't rub my mega-penis on my guns. That's a bit wacky.

Wu6NN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again with the bullshit obfuscation. No
> dummy, it's not that simple and gun deaths are not
> all equal to be lumped together in terms of risk
> of having a gun in the home. Which was the matter
> at hand.

LOL! What a hopeless dumbshit! Like some sieve-brain, you've completely lost track of the matter at hand, which is the 30,000 people who die every year as the result of guns, along with the further 200,000 who are maimed and injured every year as the result of guns. These numbers are set-in-stone, established facts. You are stupid and pathetic enough to try to challenge them, but they are all still there at the end of every day filled with your worthless guntard blabber.

You further slime yourself in your beyond absurd insistence that many quite obvious gun-related deaths should not be counted as gun-related deaths. This apparently applies to the GSW deaths of young blacks and of all people you claim after the fact to have been afflicted with some undefined form of "mental illness". You extend such patterns of denial-lunacy even to your own death, should that occur as the result of some guy driving up to your home and gunning you down. What a monstrously brain-dead assfuck you are!

> Yeah, post the source of your "4X" number.

LOL! Fall on your face much, asshole? You were earlier feigning much familiarity with "the study" and cataloging the many flaws of its author. Now you need a references? What a pathetic lying piece of shit!

> Actually it's directly and very relevant to the
> mater of what risk exists as you claimed. "4X"
> tells you nothing with respect to the actual level
> of risk without a basis for what is being
> multiplied.

Hey asshole. What is being multiplied by a factor of nearly four is the risk of dying from a gunshot wound among those who DO NOT keep a gun in the home. This has only been explained like a dozen fucking times here, and you are still TOO FUCKING STUPID to understand it. Worthless moron.

> Again you're confused dummy. If one doesn't
> attempt suicide, then there can be no success.
> Normal people (i.e., the vast majority) do not
> attempt suicide so they do not commit suicide by
> any method.

LOLOLOLOL!!!!! That's the dumbest fucking thing you've posted yet. The population being considered here is that of people who attempt suicide. Having access to and then using a gun makes the process much quicker and far more likely of success. That's the problem. The ridiculous guntard asshole is here reduced to making pointless claims about people who DO NOT attempt suicide. Those people are not in the subject population, you impossibly ignorant assfuck.

> The rates of suicide by poisoning are low only
> because is because we have 100,000s of teenage
> agirls who try to "commit suicide" because their
> boyfriend broke up with them by eating 10 tylenol.

Okay, maybe I spoke too soon about what the stupidest thing you've posted so far was. It just keeps getting worse and worse for you here.

> That's why I'm presenting facts and you're left
> to try to bullshit your way though with crap like
> this. lmao

It's a new day, asshole. And sure enough, your wonderful guns ended up killing perhaps another 85-90 people yesterday while severely wounding a further 550-600. And they'll do the same damned thing again today. And tomorrow and the next day. Killing and maiming after all are all that guns are actually good for. Nothing else at all.

> So much effort and so many words to get nowhere
> and say nothing. It's like watching a fat kid dog
> paddling. lmao! Again, sorry for your loss.

No effort required. You aren't any sort of challenge at all. Just another babbling guntard asshole. If you've seen one, you've seen them all. It's like cleaning septic tanks -- you find the same old shit inside every single one of them.

ICE ICE Babeeeeee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Navy SEALS carry at least 4 weapons on every
> mission. Sometimes 5 (grenade launcher). STFU.

Little boy is still stuck playing toy soldiers. Get some professional help and see if you can't learn to grow up some day.

Stunted growth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ICE ICE Babeeeeee Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Navy SEALS carry at least 4 weapons on every
> > mission. Sometimes 5 (grenade launcher).
> STFU.
>
> Little boy is still stuck playing toy soldiers.
> Get some professional help and see if you can't
> learn to grow up some day.


You're irrational. Knowing that my gun ownership gnaws at you and eats you up like cancer makes me happy. Carry on.

You guys can go back and forth on this topic forever and no one is changing their mind. Topic impossible list,,,

Guns
Flag burning
Abortion
Gas or charcoal
GM or Ford


There can be no clear winner on these topics except for keyboard manufacturing companies.

interwebs patrol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You guys can go back and forth on this topic
> forever and no one is changing their mind.

Thanks for the insight, Einstein. All this time we thought minds were being changed!

Watching gun nuts squirm when presented with facts and logic is plenty of entertainment in of itself. Plus, if gun nuts were to start changing their minds, imagine what would happen to the hot dog companies! Could single-handedly start a recession for crying out loud.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Watching gun nuts squirm when presented with facts
> and logic is plenty of entertainment in of itself.


We're still waiting for that one bruh. So far, you haven't laid a glove. "Logic" from Kilton? No, you mean emotion. You are way too emotional about this. It makes you unstable. Being unstable, you think you're funny or making sense when, in reality, you're blowing chunks of useless drivel.

That'll be $500 for the truth session.

Guns r bad, mmm kay.

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just another babbling guntard asshole. If you've seen one, you've
> seen them all. It's like cleaning septic tanks -- you find the same
> old shit inside every single one of them.

That's a great line. Sums up this and a dozen other similar threads.

FFU Psychologist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kilton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Watching gun nuts squirm when presented with
> facts
> > and logic is plenty of entertainment in of
> itself.
>
>
> We're still waiting for that one bruh. So far,
> you haven't laid a glove. "Logic" from Kilton?
> No, you mean emotion. You are way too emotional
> about this. It makes you unstable. Being
> unstable, you think you're funny or making sense
> when, in reality, you're blowing chunks of useless
> drivel.
>
> That'll be $500 for the truth session.

He makes plenty of sense to me. Gun owners are the unstable pussies.

No charge for the truth session.

Sense Detector Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FFU Psychologist Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Kilton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Watching gun nuts squirm when presented with
> > facts
> > > and logic is plenty of entertainment in of
> > itself.
> >
> >
> > We're still waiting for that one bruh. So far,
> > you haven't laid a glove. "Logic" from Kilton?
>
> > No, you mean emotion. You are way too emotional
> > about this. It makes you unstable. Being
> > unstable, you think you're funny or making
> sense
> > when, in reality, you're blowing chunks of
> useless
> > drivel.
> >
> > That'll be $500 for the truth session.
>
> He makes plenty of sense to me. Gun owners are the
> unstable pussies.
>
> No charge for the truth session.


You are also unstable. The immediate need for ad hominem attacks and the need to curse is a red flag. You are too emotional. Control your feelings for they are currently controlling you.

$250 for the calibration of your own self-awareness.

...
Attachments:

There are over 100 homicides/suicides/accidental gun deaths for every ONE instance of successful self-defense
Attachments:

Off the hook stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wu6NN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again with the bullshit obfuscation. No
> > dummy, it's not that simple and gun deaths are
> not
> > all equal to be lumped together in terms of
> risk
> > of having a gun in the home. Which was the
> matter
> > at hand.
>
> LOL! What a hopeless dumbshit! Like some
> sieve-brain, you've completely lost track of the
> matter at hand, which is the 30,000 people who die
> every year as the result of guns, along with the
> further 200,000 who are maimed and injured every
> year as the result of guns. These numbers are
> set-in-stone, established facts. You are stupid
> and pathetic enough to try to challenge them, but
> they are all still there at the end of every day
> filled with your worthless guntard blabber.
>
> You further slime yourself in your beyond absurd
> insistence that many quite obvious gun-related
> deaths should not be counted as gun-related
> deaths. This apparently applies to the GSW deaths
> of young blacks and of all people you claim after
> the fact to have been afflicted with some
> undefined form of "mental illness". You extend
> such patterns of denial-lunacy even to your own
> death, should that occur as the result of some guy
> driving up to your home and gunning you down.
> What a monstrously brain-dead assfuck you are!


Once again, lots of bullshit because you're incapable of supporting your original bullshit. lol And once again I'll force you to address the issue or show yourself, as you always do, to be the bullshitter that you are.

Nobody questions the numbers of deaths. The matter at hand is your claim that a gun in the home represents some substantial risk implied by your "4X greater!!!" bullshit. In that regard, the numbers support my case that no matter what the jive-ass multiplier may be, on an absolute basis the risk is very small.

Nobody with any sense considers suicides, intentional homicide, and accidents to be comparable types of events with equal risk across the population. That's why groups like CDC, etc., categorize them separately as they do various other causes of death. You cannot on any valid basis simply lump them all together and claim some overall risk rate to a given individual in the way that you so lamely attempt. Not even considering that your own bullshit 4X number doesn't even fit with that either. lol

>
> > Yeah, post the source of your "4X" number.
>
> LOL! Fall on your face much, asshole? You were
> earlier feigning much familiarity with "the study"
> and cataloging the many flaws of its author. Now
> you need a references? What a pathetic lying
> piece of shit!


Nope, you were claiming that I was wrong in my assessment. Then show it. Simple.

But we both know that you can't because it's based on some slanted derivative bullshit that you read somewhere and are just parroting like the mindless birdbrain that you are.


>
> > Actually it's directly and very relevant to the
> > mater of what risk exists as you claimed. "4X"
> > tells you nothing with respect to the actual
> level
> > of risk without a basis for what is being
> > multiplied.
>
> Hey asshole. What is being multiplied by a factor
> of nearly four is the risk of dying from a gunshot
> wound among those who DO NOT keep a gun in the
> home. This has only been explained like a dozen
> fucking times here, and you are still TOO FUCKING
> STUPID to understand it. Worthless moron.


Uh, yeah. Again that wasn't the question.

What is the risk rate? If you're citing a multiplier, then you must know the absolute numbers in order to calculate it. What is it? Simple.

The answer is that you can't because you don't know. The reason that you don't know is because it's a bullshit number which you were fed on an intentionally disingenuous basis because the absolute number is small and not impressive as propaganda. They're hoping that nobody actually looks to see what the X in your bullshit "4X!!!" actually is.

What is the X?


>
> > Again you're confused dummy. If one doesn't
> > attempt suicide, then there can be no success.
> > Normal people (i.e., the vast majority) do not
> > attempt suicide so they do not commit suicide
> by
> > any method.
>
> LOLOLOLOL!!!!! That's the dumbest fucking thing
> you've posted yet. The population being
> considered here is that of people who attempt
> suicide. Having access to and then using a gun
> makes the process much quicker and far more likely
> of success. That's the problem. The ridiculous
> guntard asshole is here reduced to making
> pointless claims about people who DO NOT attempt
> suicide. Those people are not in the subject
> population, you impossibly ignorant assfuck.


Nope. The populations in question here are those with and without guns in the home. That's how you get to your bullshit "4X!!!" number remember? Or have you lost track yourself in writing all of your off-point bullshit? lmao


>
> > The rates of suicide by poisoning are low only
> > because is because we have 100,000s of teenage
> > agirls who try to "commit suicide" because their
>
> > boyfriend broke up with them by eating 10
> tylenol.
>
> Okay, maybe I spoke too soon about what the
> stupidest thing you've posted so far was. It just
> keeps getting worse and worse for you here.


What I said is exactly the case. The differences in cited efficacy statistics for various methods of suicide are not related primarily to how well they work in any given case. They primarily reflect non-serious and otherwise failed attempts. If you shoot yourself in the head, then the odds are very good that you will die. If you jump from a tall building, hang yourself, or consume a lethal dose of an opiod painkiller, then the odds are equally good that you will die. There is no substantial difference in the effectiveness of the methods themselves. The survival rates do not reflect that we're able to "save" people when they try any of these particular methods. We do not, other than in very rare occasions, bring people back from jumping from substantial height or hanging or or lethal does of poison any more or less than we save them from a gun shot. There just are more people who jump from 2nd floor windows and eat a handful of Tylenol to "kill themselves" in less serious pseudo-suicide and para-suicide attempts. As anyone who is familiar with the numbers understands very well.


>
> > That's why I'm presenting facts and you're left
> > to try to bullshit your way though with crap
> like
> > this. lmao
>
> It's a new day, asshole. And sure enough, your
> wonderful guns ended up killing perhaps another
> 85-90 people yesterday while severely wounding a
> further 550-600. And they'll do the same damned
> thing again today. And tomorrow and the next day.
> Killing and maiming after all are all that guns
> are actually good for. Nothing else at all.


Virtually none of which affected any typical person with a gun in the home.

~60 of those would be suicides which are N/A for the general population of gun owners. If you're not a middle-aged white male with a long history of mental issues and typically associated substance abuse, then the risk represented is trivially small. Even in the case that you inappropriately consider all of these deaths applicable to all gun-owning households, then on any given day your odds of dying as a result of a self-inflicted gun shot would be about 1 in 850,000.

~25 would be young black men associated with drug- and gang-related criminal activity shooting each other with typically illegal guns. If you are not in that group, then the risk represented is trivially small. Again in the case that you want to inappropriately consider all applicable to all gun-owning households, then on any given day your odds of dying as a result of a gun-associated homicide would be about 1 in 2 million.

The remaining 5 would be split between very rare atypical suicides, homicides, justifiable homicides, and a relatively trivial number of accidental unintentional shootings. That would be your more appropriate number for a realistic risk basis for a typical gun in the home. (Which even then would overstate/understate the risk in any given case since it is not equal across the population based on various other factors.) That would put it at about 1 in 10 million.


>
> > So much effort and so many words to get nowhere
> > and say nothing. It's like watching a fat kid
> dog
> > paddling. lmao! Again, sorry for your loss.
>
> No effort required. You aren't any sort of
> challenge at all. Just another babbling guntard
> asshole. If you've seen one, you've seen them
> all. It's like cleaning septic tanks -- you find
> the same old shit inside every single one of them.


I'm sorry that you can't support your argument and have to post endless bullshit like this. If you could, then you wouldn't have to.

This guy sums it up perfectly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0

The Hotdog Gala Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows. It's
> just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest
> tactical outfits.

You'd be surprised how many hot women are at gun shows these days. Yes, there are plenty of goobers there. But the normal public is getting into weapons more and more. I have plenty of guns and ammo but I go to watch others. Occasionally, I find something I like that isn't overpriced.

Instead of ill-informed people making fun of gun shows, they should go to one and see what it's about. If you want to poke fun afterwards, have at it. At least you wouldn't be one of those douchebags who makes idiotic statements without having actually experienced it yourself.

Reported today:

In the days since the heinous terror attacks in Paris took 130 innocent lives and wounded hundreds more, Americans have flooded into gun stores to purchase new guns and sign up for concealed carry permit classes in their respective states.

And those buying guns include many who have never owned a gun before.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) processed a record number of firearm-related background checks in the month of October, completing six consecutive record months. There were 1,976,759 firearm background checks in October—373,290 more than the previous year.

Self defense argument = bullshit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This guy sums it up perfectly.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0

HAHAHAHA, that's awesome. The mind of any guntard who watches it will shut down because it makes too much sense.

Libs can whine, bitch, and post bullshit stats all they want but the gun show in Chantilly will still go on. Tough shit.

holycow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Self defense argument = bullshit Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This guy sums it up perfectly.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0
>
> HAHAHAHA, that's awesome. The mind of any guntard
> who watches it will shut down because it makes too
> much sense.

I'm sure it makes no sense to these people too:

http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/local/florida/2015/11/13/88-year-old-florida-woman-opens-fire-intruder-her-miami-home/75695372/

http://q13fox.com/2015/11/06/when-home-intruders-kick-in-door-21-year-old-mom-runs-to-grab-pistol-drives-them-off-in-fierce-gunfight/

http://www.newson6.com/story/30465496/tulsa-police-fire-responding-to-shooting

ICE ICE Babeeeeee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A few guns? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > B52 Joe Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I was going to go and buy a few guns at the
> gun
> > > show. Then some raging, angry libfag on FFU
> > said
> > > that would make me a coward and called
> everyone
> > > assholes and that changed my mind. Now, I
> > > completely trust the police to protect me and
> > the
> > > criminals to be nice to me. How can anyone
> > > withstand the withering pretzel logic and 3rd
> > > grade insults from the libfag? I have turned
> > all
> > > my guns over to random black folk because I
> see
> > > how I was really just a coward and loved to
> buy
> > > guns only because of a hotdog fetish. The
> > libfag
> > > told me so.
> >
> > The one thing you learn in a firefight is the
> only
> > gun you need is the one you have at that
> moment.
> > Any more is just baggage. Otherwise don't get
> hit
> > by a car or have a heart attack.
>
>
> Navy SEALS carry at least 4 weapons on every
> mission. Sometimes 5 (grenade launcher). STFU.

You a SEAL? Or just one to many movies?

awenhcherke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Hotdog Gala Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows.
> It's
> > just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest
> > tactical outfits.
>
> You'd be surprised how many hot women are at gun
> shows these days. Yes, there are plenty of goobers
> there. But the normal public is getting into
> weapons more and more. I have plenty of guns and
> ammo but I go to watch others. Occasionally, I
> find something I like that isn't overpriced.
>
> Instead of ill-informed people making fun of gun
> shows, they should go to one and see what it's
> about. If you want to poke fun afterwards, have at
> it. At least you wouldn't be one of those
> douchebags who makes idiotic statements without
> having actually experienced it yourself.

Been there, done that. I saw some piglets yelling at their husbands about the mortgage overdue.

Afterwards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Been there, done that. I saw some piglets yelling
> at their husbands about the mortgage overdue.

That's simply not true.

Guns save lives.

J6kF7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guns save lives.


Got me one of those gun transplants last year. Feel a hole lot better now

Afterwards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> awenhcherke Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Hotdog Gala Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Only amateurs and wannabes attend gun shows.
> > It's
> > > just a fat fuck fashion show for the latest
> > > tactical outfits.
> >
> > You'd be surprised how many hot women are at
> gun
> > shows these days. Yes, there are plenty of
> goobers
> > there. But the normal public is getting into
> > weapons more and more. I have plenty of guns
> and
> > ammo but I go to watch others. Occasionally, I
> > find something I like that isn't overpriced.
> >
> > Instead of ill-informed people making fun of
> gun
> > shows, they should go to one and see what it's
> > about. If you want to poke fun afterwards, have
> at
> > it. At least you wouldn't be one of those
> > douchebags who makes idiotic statements without
> > having actually experienced it yourself.
>
> Been there, done that. I saw some piglets yelling
> at their husbands about the mortgage overdue.

lol there's always a few wive's dragged to the show for the first...and last time. It's nothing more than a boys toy store. And everyone is a gun expert. That's why they are shopping.

Self defense argument = bullshit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This guy sums it up perfectly.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0

Man, that is awesome. Great stuff. No gun nut will ever get all the way through it without closing the browser window out of anger.

ilocbr Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs can whine, bitch, and post bullshit stats all
> they want but the gun show in Chantilly will still
> go on. Tough shit.

LOL, it better go on. Nobody wants a recession triggered by mass layoffs in the hot dog industry.

Here's a close-up picture of a guy's plate from the last show:

I watched the entire video of the sophisticated "Austrayan". I didn't turn it off. It wasn't funny, just typical Socialist bullshit.

So what does that mean. I agree with him, the best argument is "f--- off, I like guns."

Because, the 2nd amendment doesn't give us the right to our guns, it only recognizes the God-given right.

Unfortunately, Australia is a Godless country. So there.

The wall mounted defibrillator at the Dulles expo center gets the batteries drained every time there is a gun show. Several of those fat fucks have to be transported to the ER after a jolt or two. We are going to have a rescue squad on site all weekend this time.

The Nation's Gun Show is the perfect example of how stupid some people in America have become. The same idiots who bitch about rag-heads, niggers, spikes, etc. should take a serious look at others and themselves wobbling around looking for more guns. Why do these guys eat hotdogs if they're so homophobic?

Is Tailgating allowed in the parking lot?

big jimm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Tailgating allowed in the parking lot?


No, but aggressive driving is. Cars need to get outta your way when you need that 37th gun.

Australian Clown Video Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So what does that mean. I agree with him, the best
> argument is "f--- off, I like guns."

Ah, perfect. Finally a gun nut admits that all the usual reasons for gun ownership are baloney, and that the real reason for gun popularity in this country is the endless sea of losers with TDD (Testosterone Deficiency Disease), who obsess over guns just to make themselves feel manly.

I think this thread has made some real progress!

ukrujrfgefjiek Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the days since the heinous terror attacks in Paris
took 130 innocent lives and wounded hundreds more...

Guns in the US have taken more than 500 innocent lives and wounded thousands more.

Australian Clown Video Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Unfortunately, Australia is a Godless country. So there.

Hello? EVERYWHERE is a Godless country. What's wrong with you?

Syrian Terrorists are on their way! Everyone to the gun show, stock up on guns and ammo. Go home and shoot anything that moves....it's the only way to save our souls. Sound familiar?

Keeping score Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ukrujrfgefjiek Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In the days since the heinous terror attacks in
> Paris
> took 130 innocent lives and wounded hundreds
> more...
>
> Guns in the US have taken more than 500 innocent
> lives and wounded thousands more.


Cars in the U.S. have taken more than 33,000 innocent lives last year and wounded thousands more. Join me this weekend in our cause to shut down all automobile dealerships.

God Save the USA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Syrian Terrorists are on their way! Everyone to
> the gun show, stock up on guns and ammo. Go home
> and shoot anything that moves....it's the only way
> to save our souls. Sound familiar?

Sounds a lot like the mating call of the Right-Winged Guntard. Flocks of those came rushing through back when Baghdad shopkeepers were supposedly coming to cut off all our heads with chainsaws. Same old song of far-right fear and emotional bullshit. This is all this crowd has got.

damn Henry Ford Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cars in the U.S. have taken more than 33,000
> innocent lives last year and wounded thousands
> more. Join me this weekend in our cause to shut
> down all automobile dealerships.

Cars have a million-and-one beneficial uses. Guns have none.

Cars are heavily regulated by government so as to minimize the damage that they might do. That's what needs to be done with guns as well. When are you going to grow up and realize that?

Gun damage done in the US since the Paris attacks has been more than TRIPLE what was done in those events. It will reach and surpass the level of FIVE TIMES MORE by Monday.

The thing about guys who like guns is that they are all so gross and stupid as hell. They like smell bad and just like make everyone gag like OMG, WTF everyone hates gun guys. GROSS!!

Gun guys are the same ones who can't figure out how to open a twisty-tie.

Dean... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gun guys are the same ones who can't figure out
> how to open a twisty-tie.

Don't you just shoot it?

Bird-brain watcher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sounds a lot like the mating call of the Right-Winged
> Guntard. Flocks of those came rushing through back when
> Baghdad shopkeepers were supposedly coming to cut off all
> our heads with chainsaws. Same old song of far-right fear
> and emotional bullshit. This is all this crowd has got.

Heck, I remember when the Viet Cong were going to sail across the Pacific in their fishing boats and invade San Francisco Bay. We have to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here. These looney birds have been sounding the same old alarms for decades.

If you can't screw it, kill it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Gun guys are the same ones who can't figure out
> > how to open a twisty-tie.
>
> Don't you just shoot it?

Yup! When puzzled or encountering obstacles in life, either start shooting stuff or start blowing stuff up. This is how "real men" get by in the world, bless their little hearts.

Dean... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can't screw it, kill it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > Gun guys are the same ones who can't figure
> out
> > > how to open a twisty-tie.
> >
> > Don't you just shoot it?
>
> Yup! When puzzled or encountering obstacles in
> life, either start shooting stuff or start blowing
> stuff up. This is how "real men" get by in the
> world, bless their little hearts.

Guntards. Hahahahaha!
.
Attachments:

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Guntards. Hahahahaha!
> .


These gun show guys are the very same guys who got picked on in high school and got their asses beat. You should feel sorry for them and try not to laugh.

glock block Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> These gun show guys are the very same guys who got
> picked on in high school and got their asses beat.
> You should feel sorry for them and try not to
> laugh.


^ Voted most likely to get a key to the new gender-neutral bathroom.

glock block Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These gun show guys are the very same guys who got
> picked on in high school and got their asses beat.

Yep, that's a common cause of TDD.

> You should feel sorry for them and try not to
> laugh.

This is technically correct, but it's just so difficult! I mean, who among us can resist laughing at these monkeys?

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

^ The classic beta male.

Here is a $1 off coupon, make sure you print it before going:

http://www.thenationsgunshow.com/coupon.html

Cheers!

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

Seriously? No tailgating? I am going tomorrow and set up my smokey joe to cook country ribs and chicken thighs. I will have chairs set up and music playing, we will see what happens.

LOL, a $1 coupon! Perfect for all the unemployed and underemployed losers who go to gun shows. Just like grandma at Safeway using all her coupons on toilet paper and milk.

Welcome to loserville!

If you see a gun guy the best thing to do is yell at him and spit in his face. They will piss their pants and run away. Happens every time.

^
Hair Club for Men should set up a booth.
They'd make a killing off all those balding losers.

I love guns and this is going to be a great gun show. This weekend's show is going to be packed. Don't count on any deals, though. The terrorist hysteria creates a supply and demand issue.

I'm still going though. The beef jerky sold there is unbeatable. Plus, it's just fun to watch all the crazy people.

i love that there are this many people that don't trust themselves enough to buy and own a gun without being or doing something stupid. Why cant anyone have a opinion and shut up, instead of making such stupid comments about others opinion.

stupidhere Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i love that there are this many people that don't
> trust themselves enough to buy and own a gun
> without being or doing something stupid. Why cant
> anyone have a opinion and shut up, instead of
> making such stupid comments about others opinion.


Thats a great question.

Fuck you.

i really don't know how to take that are you hitting on me

thigh man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Seriously? No tailgating? I am going tomorrow and
> set up my smokey joe to cook country ribs and
> chicken thighs. I will have chairs set up and
> music playing, we will see what happens.


Yeah! Fuck it I will be there serving home made turkey and bean chili with potato salad and fried hot wings. No beer though as that would get us shut down.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL, a $1 coupon! Perfect for all the unemployed
> and underemployed losers who go to gun shows. Just
> like grandma at Safeway using all her coupons on
> toilet paper and milk.
>
> Welcome to loserville!
>
> src="http://truthaboutguns-zippykid.netdna-ssl.com
> /wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Gun-show-courtesy-greg
> fallisdotcom.wordpress.com_.jpg">





Which pony are you Kilton?

lulz

That looks like a cool event above, what is it? Not as many losers there vs. a gun show.

The fat cowardly losers are already lined up at the door! What a pack of ignofucks LOL!

just drove by Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fat cowardly losers are already lined up at
> the door! What a pack of ignofucks LOL!


Says the 23 year old who's mother sent him to Walmart for Spaghettios

just drove by Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fat cowardly losers are already lined up at
> the door! What a pack of ignofucks LOL!


Why did you just drive by there?

your mom called , go home Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> just drove by Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The fat cowardly losers are already lined up at
> > the door! What a pack of ignofucks LOL!
>
>
> Says the 23 year old who's mother sent him to
> Walmart for Spaghettios

Take me to Walmart any day of the week vs. a gun show. Classier people at Walmart.

man of decency Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That looks like a cool event above, what is it?
> Not as many losers there vs. a gun show.


A lot more hair, too.

Poor butthurt asshat libtardz. You just sit their on your fat asses and insult people who are legally exercising their rights to attend an event.

Now run along. I'm sure your parents have some chores for you to do.
Attachments:

man of decency Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That looks like a cool event above, what is it?
> Not as many losers there vs. a gun show.


You tell 'em brony.

Want to get together for froyo and argue about who's the best pony?

erjkdtkcrhg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Poor butthurt asshat libtardz. You just sit their
> on your fat asses and insult people who are
> legally exercising their rights to attend an
> event.
>
> Now run along. I'm sure your parents have some
> chores for you to do.


^^^^Says the ignofuck cowardly guntard.^^^

LOL

erjkdtkcrhg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Poor butthurt asshat libtardz. You just sit their
> on your fat asses and insult people who are
> legally exercising their rights to attend an
> event.

Wow! Sounds like you're pretty upset over there. Just because you love hot dogs doesn't mean you need to be offended by this thread.

You may want to fill out your own form there, slapnuts. :-)

erjkdtkcrhg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Poor butthurt asshat libtardz. You just sit their
> on your fat asses and insult people who are legally
> exercising their rights to attend an event. Now run
> along. I'm sure your parents have some chores for
> you to do.

It's not illegal to be an asshole. Just stupid.

Hey, dumbass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> damn Henry Ford Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Cars in the U.S. have taken more than 33,000
> > innocent lives last year and wounded thousands
> > more. Join me this weekend in our cause to shut
> > down all automobile dealerships.
>
> Cars have a million-and-one beneficial uses. Guns
> have none.
>
> Cars are heavily regulated by government so as to
> minimize the damage that they might do. That's
> what needs to be done with guns as well. When are
> you going to grow up and realize that?
>

Cars are heavily regulated by government so as to make them less safe. Thousands are killed in car accidents each year, due to CAFE standards which have the effect of making cars lighter and smaller.


> Gun damage done in the US since the Paris attacks
> has been more than TRIPLE what was done in those
> events. It will reach and surpass the level of
> FIVE TIMES MORE by Monday.

Gun damage in the US is largely due to illegal guns in the hands of a population heavily victimized and infantilized by Democrat policies.

Looking forward to the gun show!

I work for the plumbing contractor used by the Dulles expo center and I am on call this weekend. I am heading over there now even though they have not called yet. These fat asses clog the toilets over and over every single time there is a show. At least I will get some serious overtime pay right before Christmas.

nemesis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cars are heavily regulated by government so as to
> make them less safe. Thousands are killed in car
> accidents each year, due to CAFE standards which
> have the effect of making cars lighter and smaller.

Right! Hop in the Hummer and go get some more guns, you fucking moron. Don't worry, you'll be safe. The roads have al;l met safety design standards and even manly-man Hummers come with government-mandated seat belts, air bags, and emission controls. Manly-man is actually Bubble-Boy.

> Gun damage in the US is largely due to illegal
> guns in the hands of a population heavily
> victimized and infantilized by Democrat policies.

Gun damage in the US is largely due to GUNS. It's just the really stupid people who can't seem to catch up to that fact.

> Looking forward to the gun show!

Six with mustard and kraut, please?

A true American pro-gun advocate would shoot himself in a none life threatening area of his body to prove to the anti-gun freaks that you are a strong macho individual and not the chickenshit coward that liberals think you are.

Still looking forward to the gun show.
Still hotter than your wife. A. Lot.
Still a better shot than you.

Do they sell ammo?

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow! Sounds like you're pretty upset over there.
> Just because you love hot dogs doesn't mean you
> need to be offended by this thread.
>
> You may want to fill out your own form there,
> slapnuts. :-)


Which pony are you Kilton?

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Gun damage in the US is largely due to GUNS. It's
> just the really stupid people who can't seem to
> catch up to that fact.
>


Northern VA (and the state of VA beyond) has lots of guns. Gun stores. Gun shows. Few gun control restrictions. Easy to get shall-issue carry permits. A gun ownership rate of +36%.

DC has very, very few legally owned guns. No gun stores. No gun shows. Very difficult to get permits. Strong gun control laws. Same with Baltimore. Gun ownership rates are less than 3%.

Gun violence in NoVA is at trivial levels.

Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that of NoVA (at least).

Why?

Facts4U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Gun damage in the US is largely due to GUNS.
> It's
> > just the really stupid people who can't seem to
> > catch up to that fact.
> >
>
>
> Northern VA (and the state of VA beyond) has lots
> of guns. Gun stores. Gun shows. Few gun control
> restrictions. Easy to get shall-issue carry
> permits. A gun ownership rate of +36%.
>
> DC has very, very few legally owned guns. No gun
> stores. No gun shows. Very difficult to get
> permits. Strong gun control laws. Same with
> Baltimore. Gun ownership rates are less than 3%.
>
> Gun violence in NoVA is at trivial levels.
>
> Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that of
> NoVA (at least).
>
> Why?


I don't expect you to be able to understand. You have already proven it.

alright one more time Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts4U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOL... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > Gun damage in the US is largely due to GUNS.
> > It's
> > > just the really stupid people who can't seem
> to
> > > catch up to that fact.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Northern VA (and the state of VA beyond) has
> lots
> > of guns. Gun stores. Gun shows. Few gun
> control
> > restrictions. Easy to get shall-issue carry
> > permits. A gun ownership rate of +36%.
> >
> > DC has very, very few legally owned guns. No
> gun
> > stores. No gun shows. Very difficult to get
> > permits. Strong gun control laws. Same with
> > Baltimore. Gun ownership rates are less than
> 3%.
> >
> > Gun violence in NoVA is at trivial levels.
> >
> > Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that
> of
> > NoVA (at least).
> >
> > Why?
>
>
> I don't expect you to be able to understand. You
> have already proven it.


So in other words ya got nuthin. lol

Facts4U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that of
> NoVA (at least). Why?

Gun-violence in all of those places is caused by guns. Not sure it can be dumbed-down any further for you.

Rock Bottom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts4U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that
> of
> > NoVA (at least). Why?
>
> Gun-violence in all of those places is caused by
> guns. Not sure it can be dumbed-down any further
> for you.


I got a kick out of " Gun ownership rates are less than 3%"
Yeah, lol . Legal gun ownership maybe.

Rock Bottom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts4U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!! that
> of
> > NoVA (at least). Why?
>
> Gun-violence in all of those places is caused by
> guns. Not sure it can be dumbed-down any further
> for you.


NoVA - More guns, less gun control, but far less gun violence.

DC - Less guns, more gun control, but 10X!!! more gun violence.

Hmmm... They say that guns from VA are why DC's rate is so high. But NoVA's rate where there are more guns is very, very low.

Why?

alright one more time Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rock Bottom Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Facts4U Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Gun violence in DC and Baltimore is 10X!!!
> that
> > of
> > > NoVA (at least). Why?
> >
> > Gun-violence in all of those places is caused
> by
> > guns. Not sure it can be dumbed-down any
> further
> > for you.
>
>
> I got a kick out of " Gun ownership rates are less
> than 3%"
> Yeah, lol . Legal gun ownership maybe.


So you're saying that gun control laws don't really work?

Even if you count illegal guns in DC and Baltimore, NoVA still would be far ahead in terms of numbers of guns and far, far behind in rates of gun violence.

Why?

NRA proud.
Attachments:

"Why?" was the question that Enron used to ask. These days, it's mostly people who are too stupid to go find stuff out for themselves.

Kenny-boy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Why?" was the question that Enron used to ask.
> These days, it's mostly people who are too stupid
> to go find stuff out for themselves.


So (again) ya got nuthin huh?

lol

Facts4U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Go fuck yourself, you worthless asswipe. Gun violence is ALL caused by guns. That's the one and only explanation for it. Doesn't matter who or where you are. The closer you are to a gun, the more likely you are to be killed or maimed by one. Since they have no redeeming value, the sane practice is to stay away as best you can from guns and from all the low-life and deluded fucktards who worship and carry them.

Rock Bottom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts4U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Go fuck yourself, you worthless asswipe. Gun
> violence is ALL caused by guns. That's the one
> and only explanation for it. Doesn't matter who
> or where you are. The closer you are to a gun,
> the more likely you are to be killed or maimed by
> one. Since they have no redeeming value, the sane
> practice is to stay away as best you can from guns
> and from all the low-life and deluded fucktards
> who worship and carry them.

Good luck defending yourself with your keyboard when you're in a home invasion. You've chosen to live in a high-gun low violence area, so while you enjoy that, quit talking crap about those who make it so. We're not the ones you have to worry about.

why oh why oh why Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why do you guys continue to troll guntards? There
> is no sport in it. It is like hunting squirrels
> with a peanut butter baited rat trap that is
> nailed to a tree. They never catch on to the
> game.
> Pro-gun people are victims and they do not deserve
> to be tortured like this. This is not clever
> trolling.


True.

Rock Bottom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Facts4U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Go fuck yourself, you worthless asswipe. Gun
> violence is ALL caused by guns. That's the one
> and only explanation for it. Doesn't matter who
> or where you are. The closer you are to a gun,
> the more likely you are to be killed or maimed by
> one. Since they have no redeeming value, the sane
> practice is to stay away as best you can from guns
> and from all the low-life and deluded fucktards
> who worship and carry them.


Apparently not...

NoVA - More guns, less gun control, but far less gun violence.

DC/Baltimore - Less guns, more gun control, but 10X!!! more gun violence.

On one side of a bridge, the guns are associated with a trivial level of violence. On the other, it's +10X!!! higher.

Why?

Are the guns in DC and Baltimore different vs those in NoVA?

I will be there having a no guns protest in the parking lot tommorow, Come on by and get a free hot dog!

Vickie Mangoo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will be there having a no guns protest in the
> parking lot tommorow, Come on by and get a free
> hot dog!


Bring your mother so there be at least 2 of you there looking stupid

Vickie Mangoo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will be there having a no guns protest in the
> parking lot tommorow, Come on by and get a free
> hot dog!

Dude, you're going to get raped by the gun fags if you start giving away hot dogs. Don't do it.

Take One for the 2nd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A true American pro-gun advocate would shoot
> himself in a none life threatening area of his
> body to prove to the anti-gun freaks that he is
> a strong macho individual and not the chickenshit
> coward that liberals think he is.


Hmmm, no takers?

>Go fuck yourself, you worthless asswipe

Just as well be a fingerprint. ^^ The moron "Know It All" with the vulgar liberal mouth.. Whats new about that?? Nothing..TYPICAL DEMOCRAT HAS GOT NOTHING AS USUAL JUST A VULGAR MOUTH

kline 880 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> why oh why oh why Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why do you guys continue to troll guntards?
> There
> > is no sport in it. It is like hunting squirrels
> > with a peanut butter baited rat trap that is
> > nailed to a tree. They never catch on to the
> > game.
> > Pro-gun people are victims and they do not
> deserve
> > to be tortured like this. This is not clever
> > trolling.
>
>
> True.


So very true.

true 2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> kline 880 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > why oh why oh why Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Why do you guys continue to troll guntards?
> > There
> > > is no sport in it. It is like hunting
> squirrels
> > > with a peanut butter baited rat trap that is
> > > nailed to a tree. They never catch on to the
> > > game.
> > > Pro-gun people are victims and they do not
> > deserve
> > > to be tortured like this. This is not clever
> > > trolling.
> >
> >
> > True.
>
>
> So very true.

You're stupid.

I went to the gun show yesterday and only about 60% of the patrons are morbidly obese. I was surprised to see quite a few gay guys there.

If you ever encounter a pro gun person give this a try, look directly into their eyes. This causes guntards to go into panic mode. You will see a look of sheer terror on their faces. They are all cowards to the very core of their souls.

not a coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you ever encounter a pro gun person give this a
> try, look directly into their eyes. This causes
> guntards to go into panic mode. You will see a
> look of sheer terror on their faces. They are all
> cowards to the very core of their souls.

Hitting the bottle a little early today I see.

mw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I went to the gun show yesterday and only about
> 60% of the patrons are morbidly obese. I was
> surprised to see quite a few gay guys there.

That's below the nationwide percentage of fat people.

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mw Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I went to the gun show yesterday and only about
> > 60% of the patrons are morbidly obese. I was
> > surprised to see quite a few gay guys there.
>
> That's below the nationwide percentage of fat
> people.

60% morbidly obese
25% fat
15% not fat

watching2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 60% morbidly obese
> 25% fat
> 15% not fat

LOL. Dane doesn't do well with "statisticals". The difference between "obese" (morbidly or otherwise) and "overweight" goes right over his head like an airplane over your house.

The current obesity rate in the U.S. is ~35%. You're reporting 60% at the gun show, which definitely sounds right to me. Initial estimates from the first two days are that over 4.8 million hot dogs have been consumed. So it looks like they're going to easily beat the initial projection of 5.7 million for the weekend. Good work fatties!

not a coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you ever encounter a pro gun person give this a
> try, look directly into their eyes. This causes
> guntards to go into panic mode. You will see a
> look of sheer terror on their faces. They are all
> cowards to the very core of their souls.

This makes sense - they're scared of pretty much everything, so direct eye contact would be taken as a threat for sure.

Why on earth would you go to a gun show. Stick to private face to face sales.

Mike Jones69 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why on earth would you go to a gun show. Stick to
> private face to face sales.

At least you are smart enough to be ashamed of being a guntard. The patrons at the gun show can not even wipe their own asses properly.

cross town Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mike Jones69 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why on earth would you go to a gun show. Stick
> to
> > private face to face sales.
>
> At least you are smart enough to be ashamed of
> being a guntard. The patrons at the gun show can
> not even wipe their own asses properly.


http://bronies.meetup.com/cities/us/va/fairfax/

cross town Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mike Jones69 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why on earth would you go to a gun show. Stick
> to
> > private face to face sales.
>
> At least you are smart enough to be ashamed of
> being a guntard. The patrons at the gun show can
> not even wipe their own asses properly.

Hanging out in the mens room and checking out their asses is weird but if that's your thing I guess it's okay. Just don't get caught.

Mr. Peepers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cross town Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mike Jones69 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Why on earth would you go to a gun show.
> Stick
> > to
> > > private face to face sales.
> >
> > At least you are smart enough to be ashamed of
> > being a guntard. The patrons at the gun show
> can
> > not even wipe their own asses properly.
>
> Hanging out in the mens room and checking out
> their asses is weird but if that's your thing I
> guess it's okay. Just don't get caught.


One is able to determine shit on asshole syndrome from the smell also you know, and most of the people at the gun show can be smelled from Herndon. Fagnut.

fagnut fags it up fag style Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> One is able to determine shit on asshole syndrome
> from the smell also you know, and most of the
> people at the gun show can be smelled from
> Herndon. Fagnut.


So you like sniffing men's assholes too?

Whatever does it for ya I guess.

#diversity

Lifetime NRA member Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am sick an tire of all yall makin fun of gun
> owners. Guns make you smarter not dummer. My daddy
> once shot a black guy caus he was tryin ta steal
> some of our stuff. He got charged with a hate
> crime caus the guy was black. My daddy didnt even
> kill him or nothin. My daddy fired a warning shot
> into his leg. My daddy got 7 years an 6 months.


You sound like you are smarter than most NRA members.

liberal arts and craft shows bring in more wack jobs and fat fucks than any gun show. followed by indoor flea markets and jewelry and gem shows( incoherent lunatics).

If you want to buy a gun the gun show is the place to be if its there, something common. If its holsters, magazines, reloading supplies powder, primers, bullets, presses and supplies, all kinds of other standard things the place to go is GREENTOP..Its worth the drive on a weekend to see it.
All kinds of guns, new used , hundreds in the racks. As well as a huge fresh and salt water fishing section, fly fishing specialties, droves of hunting items, clothes, Columbia others,Cheap 50 dollar Stetson hats and of course just for good old Kilton...Green Egg BBQs. a huge selection at sale prices with all the EGG Cessories! And Kilton theres a HUGE selection of .45 Government Automatic Pistols.. The GUN FIGHTERS SPECIAL made by Colt, Kimber, Les Baer ..Go Get Um.. Shoulder Holster Up Miami Vice style.. and then get your Green Egg to Go and have a HUGE HOT DOG ROAST at Home buddy! Then A Great Tasty Green EGG Steak or Ribs or Fish, Burgers, Roasts! Fatten you Right up for the NEXT BIG Gun Show!

http://www.greentophuntfish.com/ Go down I 95 get off at the Elmont Exit # 86 West . After ward go to BASS PRO SHOPS for a look See, And on Livingston Road near by grab a Fried Chicken Dinner At BOJANGLES or Get a Ft Long HOT DOG KILTON STYLE With Chili and Cheese CHEAP 4 bucks! at Sonic Drive Inn on Rt 1 near Greentop RIGHT Next To WAWA..! YA BABY!

DAJAX The GREENTOP SHILL...! Tell Um "Double Action Jackson" Sent You...So take at look See at All The Smiths!!

Republican logic.
Attachments:

Sorry-ass guntards had about as good a weekend as the Redskins. I foresee the equivalent of many 0-16 seasons in their fearful, delusional futures. The pathetic just keeps on coming from their hollow, bot-grade intellects.

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry-ass guntards had about as good a weekend as
> the Redskins. I foresee the equivalent of many
> 0-16 seasons in their fearful, delusional futures.
> The pathetic just keeps on coming from their
> hollow, bot-grade intellects.

You're stupid.

Right. You're stupid, you're drunk, the Muslims are coming. This is the game plan that leads to 0-16 seasons.

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Right. You're stupid, you're drunk, the Muslims
> are coming. This is the game plan that leads to
> 0-16 seasons.

The dumbshits continue to stumble and fall. In the parlance of the founders' day, the term "bear arms" was almost always used in a military context. The civilian equivalent term was "carry weapons". I don't see any mention of that though.

Allowed the people to OWN CANNON and they still can . The MOST POWERFUL WEAPONS of WAR ONLY DESIGNED TO BE ON A BATTLEFIELD .

The Rights of the people to bear ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

DAJAX

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry-ass guntards had about as good a weekend as
> the Redskins.

The guntards ate more though!

Final tally from this weekend's show is an astonishing 6.47 million hot dogs! Wow!

LOL.... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The dumbshits continue to stumble and fall. In
> the parlance of the founders' day, the term "bear
> arms" was almost always used in a military
> context. The civilian equivalent term was "carry
> weapons". I don't see any mention of that though.


Read the SCOTUS rulings in Heller and McDonald dumbass.

Ah Yes.. The Founders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Allowed the people to OWN CANNON and they still
> can . The MOST POWERFUL WEAPONS of WAR ONLY
> DESIGNED TO BE ON A BATTLEFIELD .
>
> The Rights of the people to bear ARMS SHALL NOT BE
> INFRINGED
>
> DAJAX


That's right. You can own a cannon.

http://www.cannonsuperstore.com/wwone.htm

http://www.hatchergun.com/blkpwdrcannon.htm

http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/blackpowder-mortar-and-cannon-sponsored-by-seacoast-artillery/blackpowder-cannons-links-list/

By Federal law: If made before 1898 and fire cannon balls not fixed ammo with a shell attached. They are antiques. This law came along long after the founders wrote the 2nd amendment. There's never been a case with SCOTUS with Cannon ownership.

If there ever is they will have to bastardize the Constitution to disallow them.As the founders allowed them. And the same goes with all Gun Rights!
Democrats can take their "Don't need more then 5 rounds to kill a deer" and stick it in their asses. The 2nd has Nothing to Do with Hunting..

But Democrats LOUD MOUTH about Assault rifles high cap magazines as "Weapons of War that only should be allowed on a Battlefield"..

Nothing but brain dead assholes that don't even know Jack Shit about the founding of this Country, the Constitution or anything else that really Matters! Illegal Lovers and now letting 200K Syrians into the USA! With How many Terrorists among them?? All for a dammed vote! The shit will Hit the Fan and Obama Will be Impeached if any crap comes out of the Syrians.. That's for sure!

Background checks on Syrians.. Ya Right.. Impossible!

DAJAX

m3jVs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Read the SCOTUS rulings in Heller and McDonald dumbass.

Bad news, assfuck. They DO NOT say what you think they say. Stupid worthless fucked over dumbshit. The decisions established (for the first time) a very narrow individual right that the state can "infringe" upon in all sorts of ways. Be afraid, you cowardly asswipe, be very afraid! Make plans now to BUY MORE GUNS!!!

Thats Right Cannon are Legal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Democrats can take their "Don't need more then 5
> rounds to kill a deer" and stick it in their
> asses. The 2nd has Nothing to Do with Hunting..

Right. It has to do with promises made that the new Congress would not try to eliminate slavery by disarming the militias in slave-owning states that stood as the first (and often only) line of defense of white society against the possibility of violent slave revolts. But since we don't have slavery anymore, the 2nd Amendment has become archaic and obsolete. It should be repealed.

Thats Right Cannon are Legal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Democrats can take their "Don't need more then 5
> rounds to kill a deer" and stick it in their
> asses. The 2nd has Nothing to Do with Hunting..

LOL, you dipstick. Who said it has anything to do with hunting? We've already established that all it has to do with is gun nuts being scared little pusscakes who fear their own shadow and think that ISIS is going to attack their house.

Hope this clarifies!

>It should be repealed

Go For It LOL , After all that's the constitutional way to do it. And if you can succeed in amending the Constitution well that's the way it goes. It would be lawful.

But passing just laws isn't constitutional if the laws infringe on lawful firearms ownership.

>Who said it has anything to do with hunting?

Why the wonderful idiot Democrat who is the Guv of New York. "Don't need more then 5 rounds to kill a deer" thats what he said when he signed the magazine capacity law and they forgot to exempt police the assholes.

DAJAX The "scared little pusscake" Who Loves Hot Dogs almost as much as Kilton!

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> LOL, you dipstick. Who said it has anything to do
> with hunting? We've already established that all
> it has to do with is gun nuts being scared little
> pusscakes who fear their own shadow and think that
> ISIS is going to attack their house.
>
> Hope this clarifies!


http://bronies.meetup.com/cities/us/va/chantilly/

I don't know about you, but I can't wait for the next show!

Hey Hey Its The Way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why the wonderful idiot Democrat who is the Guv of
> New York. "Don't need more then 5 rounds to kill
> a deer" thats what he said when he signed the
> magazine capacity law and they forgot to exempt
> police the assholes.

LOL, so nothing to do with this thread then. Got it.

What happened to your registered name, Einstein? Forgot your password? :-)

Love these shows T Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know about you, but I can't wait for the
> next show!


Me too! I think there is a gun show in Fredericksburg soon. I would like to go but it is kind of far away and I get so scared and worried if I have been away from home too long. Maybe I will just stay home and clean my guns.

Hey Hey Its The Way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go For It LOL , After all that's the
> constitutional way to do it. And if you can
> succeed in amending the Constitution well that's
> the way it goes. It would be lawful.

Just pointing out another of the many ways in which the actual history of the 2nd Amendment is ENTIRELY different from the bozo version of it commonly dispensed by the NRA and sopped up by typically fearful and ignorant guntards.

> But passing just laws isn't constitutional if the
> laws infringe on lawful firearms ownership.

Dude, it wouldn't be lawful anymore if more restrictive laws were passed. How dumb are you? And make no mistake that Heller and McDonald leave AMPLE room for more restrictive laws. You don't have an unfettered right to anything, and certainly not to guns.

Love these shows T Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know about you, but I can't wait for the next show!

Hey, at least give us time to truck in a new supply of hot dogs. We aren't ready for something on that scale again yet...
.
Attachments:

Wish I could have been a mouse in the corner at the Brady Bunch hq when the SCOTUS handed down their rulings in Heller & McDonald. I'll bet they all shit themselves.
LOL!

You could have just read up on the rulings, which you plainly have not.

I went. I go to every show. I bought another new gun on Sunday. Its a nice new SIG 227. Great gun. I work and make good money so I can afford to buy all the guns I want.

And I have never ever had a hot dog at one of these shows. I have bought a coke once or twice over the years but no hot dogs.

>Dude, it wouldn't be lawful anymore if more restrictive laws were passed. How dumb are you? And make no mistake that Heller and McDonald leave AMPLE room for more restrictive laws

That does not make it lawful with 4 Unconstitutional "scholars" on the "High" Court who rule as they please because they can get away with it. It just makes it the way it is. For now, or it may make it worse later for gun owners or better. This country has plenty of road left to travel down.

DAJAX

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL, you dipstick. Who said it has anything to do
> with hunting? We've already established that all
> it has to do with is gun nuts being scared little
> pusscakes who fear their own shadow and think that
> ISIS is going to attack their house.

Nope. You only voiced your opinion and, of course, you're wrong. Thanks for playing. Now you can go back to your butthurt libtard ways.

kecth5ujg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kilton Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > LOL, you dipstick. Who said it has anything to
> do
> > with hunting? We've already established that
> all
> > it has to do with is gun nuts being scared
> little
> > pusscakes who fear their own shadow and think
> that
> > ISIS is going to attack their house.
>
> Nope. You only voiced your opinion and, of course,
> you're wrong. Thanks for playing. Now you can go
> back to your butthurt libtard ways.

You mean like obsessing with hot dogs, gun owners penis size, and last but not least, inspecting their asses in the mens room?

Oscar Mayer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey, at least give us time to truck in a new
> supply of hot dogs. We aren't ready for something
> on that scale again yet...

LOL, yes, this is important. You can't just have gun shows every weekend - the junk food manufacturers wouldn't be able to keep up. Loading up 747s and flying them into Dulles takes time. If we had a gun show every week, the hot dogs would run out, and the scared fattie gun nuts would start to riot. That wouldn't be good for anybody!

kecth5ujg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nope. You only voiced your opinion and, of course,
> you're wrong. Thanks for playing. Now you can go
> back to your butthurt libtard ways.

Aww, sounds like you're the one who's hurt in the butt. Having trouble fitting into your clothes lately? Time for a bigger size? Don't worry, you're in good company. :-)

Gun nut creed:

Hey Hey Hey "Dude" Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That does not make it lawful with 4 Unconstitutional "scholars"
> on the "High" Court who rule as they please because they can
> get away with it. It just makes it the way it is. For now,
> or it may make it worse later for gun owners or better. This
> country has plenty of road left to travel down. DAJAX

So in light of all that room to enact laws of "infringement," you are firmly committed to a strict wishy-washiness on the matter. A wise choice. One that guntards -- who think only in binary terms -- will not have contemplated.

Hey Kilton!

Nothing like a tasty HOT DOG . A Sabrett with Kraut and Mustard New York's Favorite!

When checking out a new gun show "Assault Score! Pistol Grip, Black Plastic hand guards, Bayonet lug. LOL! This baby would have been "off limits" during the Clinton Assault Weapons ban!! That's how Stupid Liberals are!!!

Course this sucker was made in 1938 and only has 5 rounds, more then enough to Kill A Deer" If you could hit one with it..
Attachments:

>who rule as they please because they can get away with it

That's about the size of it. They would have been impeached 50 years ago.
But with the support of Democrats they can laugh in the American Peoples face today.

It is what it is...

Double Action Jackson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's about the size of it. They would have been
> impeached 50 years ago.

LOL! Republican asshats have never managed to realize this, but you have to actually do something wrong in order to be impeached. Assholes tried an "Impeach Earl Warren" campaign 50 years ago. Crash-and-burn city.

> But with the support of Democrats they can laugh
> in the American Peoples face today.

The court is 5-4 conservative, you pathetic dumbass. But hopefully, the Good Lord will find it provident to call Scalia home soon.
.
Attachments:

Throttles nailed down to the floor boards. Police Interceptor engines race! There en route at High Speed Creep! Armed with all your favorite Assault Weapons! Battering Rams ready.. Black Nija Suits, Jackboots with steel toes. Armored vests.. GAS!

>But hopefully, the Good Lord will find it provident to call Scalia home soon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh well.. How's the Kona Coffee Pal?? Geez! you mad bro...You should be as the next time the court changes it will be 6-3 conservative as Scalia is in better health then Ginsberg.

Hillary is Toast.. Read the Tea Leaves buddy..people are sick of liberals and their false promises.

God Bless Scalia, may he live long !

Too Lazy to sign in "LAZY DAJAX"

Whiny little NRA-fed assholes who don't actually know jack. What a pathetic collection of life's fat-ass total failures!

pro gun guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Love these shows T Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't know about you, but I can't wait for
> the
> > next show!
>
>
> Me too! I think there is a gun show in
> Fredericksburg soon. I would like to go but it is
> kind of far away and I get so scared and worried
> if I have been away from home too long. Maybe I
> will just stay home and clean my guns.


You poor guy. Sorry you have to live your life in fear. If you grew up in a pro gun family then you are a victim of a disease. You should seek mental health options.

not a coward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You poor guy. Sorry you have to live your life in
> fear. If you grew up in a pro gun family then you
> are a victim of a disease. You should seek mental
> health options.

Eventually, we'll just leave them all behind. Like the witch-burners, flat-earthers, creation-scientists, birthers, warming-deniers, and other assorted mental defectives.

Anyone who carries a gun other than a police officer or military fucker is a complete piece of worthless shit. Pro gun people do not even count as human beings and their opinions mean nothing. I wish they would step up the pace with their suicides.

the bottom line here......... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone who carries a gun other than a police
> officer or military fucker is a complete piece of
> worthless shit. Pro gun people do not even count
> as human beings and their opinions mean nothing. I
> wish they would step up the pace with their
> suicides.

You're stupid.

> military fucker

The Sprit of Chesty Says The situation is simplified , Your a asshole.

The Sprit of Chester Says Uncommon Cowardice is your Common Virtue

Go Away.. Far Far Away.

DAJAX

> and other assorted mental defectives.

You Forgot the rest:

All under the Big Tent of the Democratic Party.. The Party of FREAKS...LOL

DAJAX

Pro gun people are all bitch cowards.

> All under the Big Tent of the Democratic Party..
> The Party of FREAKS...LOL DAJAX

"The Big Tent" refers to the GOP. Are you that big a mindless dumbfuck? Don't you know anything at all?

Double Action Jackson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Kilton!
>
> Nothing like a tasty HOT DOG . A Sabrett with
> Kraut and Mustard New York's Favorite!

LOL, that picture is such a lie. As if you've ever eaten just one hot dog at once.