chuckhoffmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> rules and regs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/fi
>
> > les/9HKKQW522D98/$file/R8628.pdf
> >
> > page 3-VI-anything that is a possible explosion
> > risk is prohibited. Of course, they will just
> say
> > this was not an explosion. They will call it
> > something else.
>
> It wasn't an explosion. It was a rapid
> deflagration, but didn't transition to detonation
> and the bottle the teacher was using did not
> rupture due to overpressure, which is the
> definition of an explosion.
>
> What most likely happened is that when the teacher
> went to add more alcohol to the fire, the alcohol
> vapors trapped in the bottle caught fire, because
> methyl alcohol has a very low flash point (well
> below room temperature, in fact). This flash fire
> caused an overpressure (without rupture) and the
> liquid alcohol sprayed out of the bottle, where it
> also ignited, spraying everyone nearby with
> burning alcohol.
>
> The effect was kind of like a flamethrower, but
> even more rapid.
>
> Here's a video showing some people deliberately
> igniting methanol vapors in a bottle
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxC8p439isU
I know they have lots of things that are flammable in the classrooms and schools. They still have standards for dealing with these chemicals. Somebody FOIA the Chemical Hygiene Plan. I would bet anything that this should have been done under a hood, etc.