Worth a read to all your AM doxers ..

http://subliminalridge.blogspot.com/2012/10/understanding-barrett-browns-case.html

... and this article ..

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/11/28/the-illegal-activity-of-doxing-revealing-documents-or-personal-information-about-a-person-without-their-permission-with-the-intent-to-threaten-harass-intimidate-shame-humiliate-or-place/

"“Doxing“ is a legal term that means revealing “documents” about a person. This can range from revealing the name of a person who uses an alias, but more commonly refers to revealing whatever the person doing it feels will harm, shame, humiliate, endanger, or put the person at some risk. Doxing is a form of stalking or threatening and is illegal under many different federal and state laws, depending on the exact facts and location.

Revealing a “name” per se’ may, or may not be considered “Doxing” depending on the level of anticipated anonymity. However, in this law, the term “restricted personal information” means, “with respect to an individual, the Social Security number, the home address, home phone number, mobile phone number, personal email, or home fax number of, and identifiable to, that individual.” This is an important distinction to remember.

Once you outline the address or location of a person, within which a person can be placed at risk, YOU have VIOLATED THE LAW. PERIOD."

Jesus. Quit yer crying.

No crying here. Just posting information that I'm finding regarding the legal-line of doxing.

also very interesting articles here too ..

http://www.aaronkellylaw.com/reddit-v-gawker-is-doxing-illegal/

http://www.lifeofthelaw.org/2015/01/lifeafterdoxing/

So your beef is with Mrs Snowden.

"Website operators who allow the posting of user-generated content on their sites enjoy broad immunity from legal liability. This includes immunity from copyright violations if the site owner registers with the Copyright Office, does not encourage the copyright violations and takes down infringing content upon receiving notice from a copyright owner (see our post here for more information). There is also broad immunity from liability for other legal violations that may occur within user-generated content. In a recent case, involving the website Roommates.com, the US Court of Appeals determined that the immunity is broad, but not unlimited if the site is set up so as to elicit the improper conduct. A memo from attorneys in various Davis Wright Tremaine offices, which can be found here, provides details of the Roommates.com case and its implications."

TimeToGetALawyer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Revealing a “name” per se’ may, or may not
> be considered “Doxing” depending on the level
> of anticipated anonymity. However, in this law,
> the term “restricted personal information”
> means, “with respect to an individual, the
> Social Security number, the home address, home
> phone number, mobile phone number, personal email,
> or home fax number of, and identifiable to, that
> individual.” This is an important distinction
> to remember.
>
> Once you outline the address or location of a
> person, within which a person can be placed at
> risk, YOU have VIOLATED THE LAW. PERIOD."


all bullshit!

i can go right now to LEGALLY RUN FREE sites that provide all the above infornmation AND some will give out MORE information for $2-3

i can go type my name in some of these sites and my own previous addresses etc... all pop up


YOU can WANT

"Once you outline the address or location of a
> person, within which a person can be placed at
> risk, YOU have VIOLATED THE LAW. PERIOD.


to be true, but it never will.

pathetic fucking crying bitch cunts