Re: FCPS School Board meeting ILLEGAL vote June 15, 2015!!!!!!!
Posted by:
Shooting Fish in a Barrel
()
Date: June 29, 2015 07:49PM
Shoulda seen it Thurs nite Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow, what a show last night was! The board
> admitted that there was no LEGAL standing for a
> year-long task force researching family Life vs.
> health pro-gay agenda, and then they pushed it
> through anyway? huh?!!
What the hell are you talking about? Who needs legal standing to conduct a study? And what is this bullshit - "family life vs. health pro-gay agenda". Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?
> There's must have been 500 in attendance,
> (overflow watching a screen in the gym) many many
> citizens provided cogent, well-researched and
> documented speeches
In other words, a bunch of right wing horseshit.
> that showed that none of this
> blindsiding agenda was supported at the state
> level.
What blindsiding agenda? And why would it need to be supported at the state level?
> The citizens showed opposition of easily
> 95%.
Really. Did you take a headcount? Is it possible that you're just an eensy, weensy, tiny bit biased?
> The school board listened patiently to each
> presenter ..... and then in a convoluted mess of
> amendments voted the opposite - they did anything
> and everything to push it through.
"They did anything and everything to push it through" - in other words, they voted.
> The school board didn't follow protocol with
> including a school board rep in the year-long task
> force,
I thought you said they just approved the concept of a task force.
> nobody knows anything about where the
> agenda came from,
What agenda? You said they approved a task force to research whatever the hell your griping about.
> how could they even continue the
> vote when it was uncovered that SOP hadn't been
> observed?
What SOP? And why do you people always focus on minor violations of protocol (which probably didn't even exist in this case) when you've lost an argument?
> HAD there been a school board rep, a
> principal or two, a couple clergy, who was on this
> task force?!
Wait...you need a couple of clergy on this task force? What denomination? I'm voting for a rabbi.
You can barely form a coherent sentence, let alone a compelling argument. You may have passion, but you're just not up to the task. Of course, most of the people on your side aren't.