Bulova tries to justify County finances
Posted by:
Madder than Hell
()
Date: March 24, 2015 01:10PM
Sharon Bulova and Ed Long are singing the same song "fewer services for more money" and that's just not how it works in the real world.
If you complain to her about the Board of Supervisors giving themselves a raise, this is what she has to say:
_____________
Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts about salaries for the Board of Supervisors and the Fiscal Year 2016 Budget. I appreciate the opportunity to share information about the County’s financial policies and authorities with you.
With respect to your comments about the county claiming poverty, Virginia is a Dillon Rule state, so the local government authority is limited to those powers expressly granted by the state or necessarily implied by state law. Local governments have a limited set of revenue sources approved by the state and many of the approved sources also have a cap on the rate which can be imposed. We cannot, for example, impose a local sales or income tax without first getting enabling legislation from the Virginia General Assembly.
Unfortunately, these limits on authority have left Fairfax County with significant obligations but a limited set of revenue to draw on – over 60% of General Fund revenue comes from the real estate tax. As a result, it is very challenging to balance the budget when real estate values are growing slowly, as has been the recent trend. Commercial values have actually decreased the past two years. Fairfax County and the D.C. Metro region continue to recover from the recession but the pace of growth has not returned to pre-recession levels. Federal government employment and spending are major drivers for our local economy and many local residents and businesses have been affected significantly by sequestration and cutbacks in federal contracting. I recognize that many households are also facing increased costs or stagnant wages and this will be at the forefront of my thoughts as we work on the FY2016 Budget.
Based on these factors, the Board of Supervisors voted on March 3 to advertise the same real estate tax rate, $1.09 per $100 of assessed value, as last year. We have not made a final decision about the tax rate but the advertised tax rate is the ceiling for what can be adopted into the budget. Real estate tax bills are calculated based on the assessed value of property, so how the bill will change depends on the adopted tax rate as well as how the assessed value has changed from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2015.
Every year, we work to hold down costs and eliminate waste. The County has an Internal Auditor who reviews agency budgets to identify efficiencies and reduce waste. We also have an Auditor to the Board, who is independent of the county management structure and reports directly to the Board of Supervisors.
Based on audit findings and recommendations from county staff and the community, between FY2009 and FY2015 the Board of Supervisors has made over $269 million in reductions through revenue adjustments and targeted reductions. 653 County positions have been eliminated in the same time period and employee salaries were frozen for three years. We will continue to seek efficiencies and consider further reductions to hold down costs for taxpayers as we prepare the FY2016 budget – the County Executive’s Advertised Budget proposes eliminating an additional 45 positions.
I appreciate your comments about the timing and advisability for increasing the salaries for members of the Board of Supervisors, especially in light of the tough decisions the Board is facing on the county budget. Please be assured that maintaining quality services while keeping real estate taxes affordable for our residents and businesses is a priority for the Board of Supervisors.
There is never a good time to consider compensation for members of the Board of Supervisors. State law is very specific regarding any adjustment to Board Members’ salaries. Action may only be considered every four years and must be taken prior to adoption of the budget during an election year. In practice, our Board has only considered increases to compensation every eight years. Before the March 3 vote, action was last taken to increase compensation for members of the Board of Supervisors in 2007. If action was not taken by April 15th of this year, another opportunity to address Board compensation will not take place until the year 2019 and would not be effective until 2020 – a span of twelve years.
Even with this increase, members of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors will receive the lowest compensation among jurisdictions in our region of like size and responsibility. In addition to the time spent working on constituent issues, land use matters and transportation, most of us participate in regional planning organizations which meet in the evenings or during the daytime, making it almost impossible to serve on a “part time” basis.
Thanks again for writing to share your thoughts.
Sincerely,
Sharon Bulova