Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Hi there... I see you, my little friend. And you can run..................... but you can't hide!
PS:
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
(scratching not-recently-shaved chin)
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got -- what was that number
again, Mike? Ah, yes.
And on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh" for stalking
and other "sociopathic" activities which he admitted, and indeed
boasted of engaging in.
--Eh, what? Oh, yes! I almost forgot! And, in addition, one animated
gift. Eh, what's that? Gif..?! Is that how you say it, Mike?
(shakes head)
Hmmph. Funny word. Never heard of such a thing.
Anywho, one animated... gif... that purports to show Mr. Basl engaged
in a lewd and/or obscene dance. ...Turrible... just turrible...
Which posts Mr. Basl is convinced were made by Meade Skelton,
although none of the posts was actually known to have been made
by that scoundrel, er, I mean by or under the name of Mr. Skelton.
Given the overwhelming abundance of evidence of Mr. Skelton's
harassment of Mr. Basl, I conclude that the scales of justice tilt heavily in
favor of Mr. Basl, and find probable cause to arrest Meade Skelton for
harassing an innocent citizen of this Commonwealth.
...There!
He signs the warrant with a flourish, hands it to Basl.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Good luck catching this scoundrel, Mike. It's just turrible the way he's
been harassing you!
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! You can't imagine the terrible stress I've
been under as a result of this campaign of harassment. Indeed, I'm
in fear of my life!
INT. HENRICO COUNTY MAGISTRATE'S OFFICE
The office is a small room in the back of a grocery store, heated by a potbelly stove.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh"
for stalking, threats, blah blah blah, etc.
Hey! That a picture of your gun, Mike? It's a beaut.
"EESH"
Thanks, your Honor!
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
And what's this you wrote next to it? "Hi Chuck." Haw haw.
I suppose this pansy "Chuck" felt threatened by that?
"EESH"
(rolls eyes)
Oh yeah. He made quite a fuss. Quite the little bitch, if you'll pardon
my fran-sezz. Acted like he'd never seen a gun before. And it's not
like I actually threatened him. Well, maybe just a little. But this guy...
Your Honor, you've never met such a jerk.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Sounds like he deserved it. Anyway, this Meade character, so he's
been threatening you?
"EESH"
Your Honor, he actually had the nerve to post a video on Youtube in
which he called me a "troll" ! And he's crazy, your Honor. He --
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Don't waste your breath son. The evidence of probable cause is
overwhelming. Now, where's that durn warrant?
He locates and signs it, hands it to "eesh".
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! Um, I don't want to take up a lot of your
time, but if you don't mind, there are these two other guys who have
been threatening me. Chuckhoffman, you know, that jerk I was telling
you about. And this other character, MrMisery, who's just plain nuts.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Happy to oblige, Mike. Anything else?
The magistrate begins to prepare the two additional warrants.
"EESH"
Nope. I'm all set..................
"Eesh" rubs his hands together, smiling gleefully.
INT. FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
A *REAL* JUDGE
Are you kidding me?
"EESH"
Bu- bu- bu- your Honor! The evidence...!
A *REAL* JUDGE
(sighs)
What evidence? This?
(holds up several pages)
This is not evidence. This is... This is garbage.
"EESH
But your Honor! I'm in fear for my life from this man!!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Then why did you repeatedly, over a period of months,
mock the very idea that you had anything to fear from
MrMisery? Indeed, you stated that he was too afraid to
get in his car and drive out of his own neighborhood.
"EESH"
Well, things have changed! You saw that post --
A *REAL* JUDGE
The one by "FagCity99"?
"EESH
Yes!
A *REAL* JUDGE
And you know exactly how that that was posted by
"MrMisery"?
"EESH
Well, I just do! I am expert in detecting the "voice"
of "MrMisery." I could spot it anywhere.
A *REAL* JUDGE
Well, that's just not good enough, Mr. Eesh. It's not
nearly good enough.
"EESH
But I'm the VICTIM here. Just look at these pamphlets.
He holds out his VINE pamphlets beseeshingly.
"EESH
Right there in black and white, it says I'm the victim.
It SAYS so! And it's signed by the District Attorney!
A *REAL* JUDGE
(bangs gavel)
The case is dismissed. Defendant is ordered to pay costs.
"EESH
What?! Pay costs?!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Another word and I'll hold you in contempt.
"EESH
How 'bout two words. FUCK YOU. You fucking asshole.
I'll KILL you, bitch!!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Bailiff, remove the defendant from the courtroom.
Eesh is dragged struggling and kicking from the room.
"EESH
You haven't seen the last of me, you fucking bitch!
I know where you live!
The judge watches calmly for a few moments, until eesh is gone. Then he turns to Miz.
A *REAL* JUDGE
Now, tell me, MrMisery. Who is this individual "Cary"
you mentioned? Who, as you put it --
He puts on his reading glasses, looks through his papers. Finds a page, holds it up, and begins to read.
A *REAL* JUDGE
You write, "Acting with a reckless and callous disregard
for the rights and safety of others, Cary permitted and
empowered 'eesh' to use Fairfax Underground as an instrument
for 'eesh's' sociopathic aggression."
He pauses, and removes his glass. Looks at Miz.
End of Part 1.
Was Eesh drunk when he posted this?
"I told you to leave me and my family alone and I'd never tell how you admitted to me to swatting Miz or sending those death threats to yourself"
I think if Lizzie wanted everyone to know he told her she would have posted this on the forum herself. Eesh, you talk too much and that's going to be your downfall. You have never once denied telling Lizzie anything and the way you kissed her ass all over the place after court made it very obvious something had changed.
You called the police on her and called Papa John's after finding out she would have to testify against you shows how malicious you are and that you're trying to do anything you can to fuck with her so she doesn't tell. Did you tell the police and Papa John's that she is testifying against you in a stalking and harassment lawsuit?
I would never want Lizzie as an enemy, Megan either. You're just of much of a vindictive bitch as they are, but they have a reason to come after you. What did Lizzie or Megan ever do to you to deserve what you've done to them?
How does it feel for the two females who you victimized so badly for no reason on here are going to be the reason you going jail? Perhaps prison?
You can keep pretending that you aren't worried and making jokes of this entire thing but everyone knows you're freaking out and people are absolutely loving every minute of it.
Is he just forgetful or a liar? You be the judge. Obviously he would have known he had to do 50 hours. Why would that be such a terrible thing to admit the the forum? He did commit a crime sfterall.
Mama, Daddy come take this computer away from me
I can’t use it anymore
It’s gettin’ dark, too dark for me to see
Everyone's trollin me
I feel like I’m knockin’ on prison's door
Big black Tyrone is gonna make me his bitch and whore
Then Bubba is going to slip his dick in my back door
Knock knock knockin’on prison's door
Knock knock knockin’on prison's door
Daddy, put my guns in the ground
I can’t shoot them anymore
I had to call Vine because I'm an attention whore
That long black cloud is comin’ down
I feel like I’m knockin’ on hell's door
Please sing along to: The instrumental
http://youtu.be/2iGTbBT6nos
You would hate the world, yourself and take your self loathing out on everyone else for looking better than you too if you looked like this thing...
Attachments:
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 12:54PM
I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule this morning, and so I decided to drop into Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as much as I could of today's proceedings in the case of Misery v. Eesh.
My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh is in a lot of trouble here.
First, the atmospherics...
The court was entertaining pretrial and interlocutory motions, rather than conducting trials and so, for the most part, those present in and addressing the court were attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their motions before the court.
Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat together in the back row until their case was called.
Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy was conservatively dressed in black in what appeared to be business attire and running shoes. While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time that the court was in session, she left the courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery v. Eesh case was called before the judge and missed most of the proceedings.
Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as well, sitting by himself dressed much more casually.
Misery's attorney was unconventional in his appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and a good amount of facial hair. But he was professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported himself well professionally during and after the proceedings.
The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX Underground users who are not attorneys) means he was without counsel.
The purpose of today's proceedings was for the court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case. As best as I can understand it (I did not speak to any of the parties after the proceedings to confirm this), the motion was predicated on the fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit within the time period required by law and still had not filed a response. As a general matter, when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party) will ask the court to enter a summary judgement against the defendant (the person who is being sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule that he, the defendant, had not been properly served or given notice of the suit and/or not given proper notice of the motions filed by the plaintiff).
Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in favor of his motion for summary judgement, asserting that the suit and notice had been properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He asked that, in the alternative, if the judge declined to make a summary judgement in favor of Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys fees and costs that had been incurred so far to research, prepared, file, and argue the motions and that said fees and costs be paid as a precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the case without summary judgement.
Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no defense to not having responded to the suit. Instead, contended that he had not been properly served and asked the judge to quash service.
The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that service had been properly made; that Eesh had not responded at all, let alone within the timeframes required by law; and that grounds were there for summary judgement. She indicated however, that she was reluctant to do so in this instance at this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the suit, as well as for his motion to quash service -- both on the merits of the motion and for his failure to properly file it.
Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the situation he is in and of what he needs to do in order to defend himself, saying several times that he has no legal training; that he is attending school on the GI Bill and has no money for attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case, which he did not have.
The judge was having none of it.
She told him that he was gambling by not having counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects of court procedure. He was unable to satisfactorily answer her.
In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
She denied both the motion for summary judgement and the motion to quash service. However, she gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit or properly file a motion to quash service, whichever he chose to do. On the request by Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied that request without prejudice, saying that the attorney could bring that up again at the appropriate time.
Eesh is in trouble.
My free legal advice to him is ...
First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one, SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This is a significant case that could have implications far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that there are attorneys and organizations out there who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You have little hope of prevailing if you are not represented, as well.
Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly post can help you. But you have no idea how things you might post might hurt you.
Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of her), you might not want to show up with her in court. If you want her to be a witness for you, she might not be permitted to testify on your behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony charges against her (although, from what I can tell, those charges might well be bogus).
More later...
My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh is in a lot of trouble here.
First, the atmospherics...
The court was entertaining pretrial and interlocutory motions, rather than conducting trials and so, for the most part, those present in and addressing the court were attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their motions before the court.
Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat together in the back row until their case was called.
Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy was conservatively dressed in black in what appeared to be business attire and running shoes. While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time that the court was in session, she left the courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery v. Eesh case was called before the judge and missed most of the proceedings.
Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as well, sitting by himself dressed much more casually.
Misery's attorney was unconventional in his appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and a good amount of facial hair. But he was professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported himself well professionally during and after the proceedings.
The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX Underground users who are not attorneys) means he was without counsel.
The purpose of today's proceedings was for the court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case. As best as I can understand it (I did not speak to any of the parties after the proceedings to confirm this), the motion was predicated on the fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit within the time period required by law and still had not filed a response. As a general matter, when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party) will ask the court to enter a summary judgement against the defendant (the person who is being sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule that he, the defendant, had not been properly served or given notice of the suit and/or not given proper notice of the motions filed by the plaintiff).
Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in favor of his motion for summary judgement, asserting that the suit and notice had been properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He asked that, in the alternative, if the judge declined to make a summary judgement in favor of Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys fees and costs that had been incurred so far to research, prepared, file, and argue the motions and that said fees and costs be paid as a precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the case without summary judgement.
Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no defense to not having responded to the suit. Instead, contended that he had not been properly served and asked the judge to quash service.
The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that service had been properly made; that Eesh had not responded at all, let alone within the timeframes required by law; and that grounds were there for summary judgement. She indicated however, that she was reluctant to do so in this instance at this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the suit, as well as for his motion to quash service -- both on the merits of the motion and for his failure to properly file it.
Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the situation he is in and of what he needs to do in order to defend himself, saying several times that he has no legal training; that he is attending school on the GI Bill and has no money for attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case, which he did not have.
The judge was having none of it.
She told him that he was gambling by not having counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects of court procedure. He was unable to satisfactorily answer her.
In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
She denied both the motion for summary judgement and the motion to quash service. However, she gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit or properly file a motion to quash service, whichever he chose to do. On the request by Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied that request without prejudice, saying that the attorney could bring that up again at the appropriate time.
Eesh is in trouble.
My free legal advice to him is ...
First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one, SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This is a significant case that could have implications far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that there are attorneys and organizations out there who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You have little hope of prevailing if you are not represented, as well.
Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly post can help you. But you have no idea how things you might post might hurt you.
Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of her), you might not want to show up with her in court. If you want her to be a witness for you, she might not be permitted to testify on your behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony charges against her (although, from what I can tell, those charges might well be bogus).
More later...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:00PM
Correction:
At one point in my ridiculously long missive, above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney. To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
At one point in my ridiculously long missive, above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney. To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eeshee
Posted by:
Take apoc
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:04PM
Are
There a lot of fAirfax underground people in the court room?
How does he look like?
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Correction:
>
> At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
> To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so
> I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
There a lot of fAirfax underground people in the court room?
How does he look like?
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Correction:
>
> At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
> To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so
> I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
popcorn in microwave
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:05PM
" Instead, contended that he had not been properly served and asked the judge to quash service."
LOL!
Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough to post the documents on FFXU after he was served?
LOL!
Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough to post the documents on FFXU after he was served?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
official eesh vs mis in court
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:06PM
This should be the official thread for all court dates from here on out.
What did misery look like?!
What did misery look like?!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Prediction
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:11PM
Monique is going to end up with a suit on her hands from this mess too. I predict it or she in the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin without rralizing what she already did.
Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd damned his case.
Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd damned his case.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:14PM
>Are There a lot of fAirfax
>underground people in the
>court room?
I don't think there were any Fairfax Underground People in the courtroom. Just about everyone there (other than Eesh, Lizzy, possibly Misery, and a woman who might have been related to Misery) was someone I recognized as an attorney, and they all seemed to be there because they had a matter before the court.
But then, I was there for no reason other than to observe, so...
>How does he look like?
I am no fan of Eesh's posts. But I thought he looked good. He was professionally dressed, which is half of the battle (you'd be shocked at the manner in which some people are dressed when they come before the court). I didn't notice any visible tattoos. And he comported himself well.
One thing I neglected to mention in my first post was that after the proceeding was over, I observed him engaged in extensive conversations with Misery's attorney. I had to go back to work, though, and so I am not how long that went on, and I have no idea what they were talking about.
Is a settlement in the offing?
>underground people in the
>court room?
I don't think there were any Fairfax Underground People in the courtroom. Just about everyone there (other than Eesh, Lizzy, possibly Misery, and a woman who might have been related to Misery) was someone I recognized as an attorney, and they all seemed to be there because they had a matter before the court.
But then, I was there for no reason other than to observe, so...
>How does he look like?
I am no fan of Eesh's posts. But I thought he looked good. He was professionally dressed, which is half of the battle (you'd be shocked at the manner in which some people are dressed when they come before the court). I didn't notice any visible tattoos. And he comported himself well.
One thing I neglected to mention in my first post was that after the proceeding was over, I observed him engaged in extensive conversations with Misery's attorney. I had to go back to work, though, and so I am not how long that went on, and I have no idea what they were talking about.
Is a settlement in the offing?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Misery not eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:17PM
We all know what eesh looks like, just check off topic they were taking pics prior to court like it's all just a game.
What did misery look like? We haven't really had many pics of him, just small blurry ones.
What did misery look like? We haven't really had many pics of him, just small blurry ones.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
New date ?
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:18PM
Hey do you know when the new court date?
And is he white or black
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >Are There a lot of fAirfax
> >underground people in the
> >court room?
>
>
> I don't think there were any Fairfax Underground
> People in the courtroom. Just about everyone
> there (other than Eesh, Lizzy, possibly Misery,
> and a woman who might have been related to Misery)
> was someone I recognized as an attorney, and they
> all seemed to be there because they had a matter
> before the court.
>
> But then, I was there for no reason other than to
> observe, so...
>
>
> >How does he look like?
>
> I am no fan of Eesh's posts. But I thought he
> looked good. He was professionally dressed, which
> is half of the battle (you'd be shocked at the
> manner in which some people are dressed when they
> come before the court). I didn't notice any
> visible tattoos. And he comported himself well.
>
> One thing I neglected to mention in my first post
> was that after the proceeding was over, I observed
> him engaged in extensive conversations with
> Misery's attorney. I had to go back to work,
> though, and so I am not how long that went on, and
> I have no idea what they were talking about.
>
> Is a settlement in the offing?
And is he white or black
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >Are There a lot of fAirfax
> >underground people in the
> >court room?
>
>
> I don't think there were any Fairfax Underground
> People in the courtroom. Just about everyone
> there (other than Eesh, Lizzy, possibly Misery,
> and a woman who might have been related to Misery)
> was someone I recognized as an attorney, and they
> all seemed to be there because they had a matter
> before the court.
>
> But then, I was there for no reason other than to
> observe, so...
>
>
> >How does he look like?
>
> I am no fan of Eesh's posts. But I thought he
> looked good. He was professionally dressed, which
> is half of the battle (you'd be shocked at the
> manner in which some people are dressed when they
> come before the court). I didn't notice any
> visible tattoos. And he comported himself well.
>
> One thing I neglected to mention in my first post
> was that after the proceeding was over, I observed
> him engaged in extensive conversations with
> Misery's attorney. I had to go back to work,
> though, and so I am not how long that went on, and
> I have no idea what they were talking about.
>
> Is a settlement in the offing?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:24PM
Prediction Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> hands from this mess too. I predict it or she in
> the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin without
> rralizing what she already did.
>
> Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd
> damned his case.
I wish you weren't so stupid..just, stop..you are so dumb. I know nothing and won't have any suit against me since I am not involved in any of this. Please, just shut upppppp already lmao! Damn!
Now, a couple things - Misery wasn't there.
I'm not a witness for anyone and my fake bomb threat claims have nothing to do with this BUT I was actually at court dealing with that and the other case surrounding that whole situation which is why I left for a bit.
Anymore questions? Hope not cause I don't know anything.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> hands from this mess too. I predict it or she in
> the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin without
> rralizing what she already did.
>
> Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd
> damned his case.
I wish you weren't so stupid..just, stop..you are so dumb. I know nothing and won't have any suit against me since I am not involved in any of this. Please, just shut upppppp already lmao! Damn!
Now, a couple things - Misery wasn't there.
I'm not a witness for anyone and my fake bomb threat claims have nothing to do with this BUT I was actually at court dealing with that and the other case surrounding that whole situation which is why I left for a bit.
Anymore questions? Hope not cause I don't know anything.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
confused?!?!
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:27PM
Who is that African American boy on the right in the pic above?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:28PM
Shad Moss
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:29PM
Thanks for the clarification, Lizzie...
I agree with you that the bomb threat case against you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me off royally that you are in the situation you are in. How frightened we all should be that someone could be hauled to jail and forced to defend oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy "evidence..."
As I mentioned in my original post, since I have never met any of the parties, I was not SURE whether the person there who I thought MIGHT be Misery was, indeed, Misery.
I agree with you that the bomb threat case against you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me off royally that you are in the situation you are in. How frightened we all should be that someone could be hauled to jail and forced to defend oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy "evidence..."
As I mentioned in my original post, since I have never met any of the parties, I was not SURE whether the person there who I thought MIGHT be Misery was, indeed, Misery.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
2 cases
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:31PM
mo, you and eesh keep treating all these cases like such a joke the judges will make you both the punchlines.
also, you keep saying both cases surrounding your bomb threat and Katie's case, however records show you have 2 charges and she has none.
you and eesh are not handling this wisely, everything is being documented and you have involved yourself inadvertently, you'll see don't worry. trust me soon enough, eventually you'll understand this post.
Attachments:
also, you keep saying both cases surrounding your bomb threat and Katie's case, however records show you have 2 charges and she has none.
you and eesh are not handling this wisely, everything is being documented and you have involved yourself inadvertently, you'll see don't worry. trust me soon enough, eventually you'll understand this post.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
omg wtf lol
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:32PM
You can't make this shit up if you tried. Who needs TV when you got ffxu.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:36PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the clarification, Lizzie...
>
> I agree with you that the bomb threat case against
> you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me
> off royally that you are in the situation you are
> in. How frightened we all should be that someone
> could be hauled to jail and forced to defend
> oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy
> "evidence..."
It's okay. I have my own evidence which is why I was let go on my own signature in the first place. Police and courts do not let anyone go free who has been deemed a serious threat to anyone. i.e alleged bomb threats/threatening someone with a firearm. Especially with my criminal history. Although this isn't what this thread is about this is the last thing I'll post about that situation. As anyone with half a brain can see what happened here, whether or not you "like me" or not!
Police already spoke to me and found no probable cause based on those texts that were posted here. After said person and I got into it and I threatened to tell her ex fiancé about her cheating with me and other people she decided to take this text message of a gun, crop it and tell police that I threatened her with it (Filing a false police report - criminal).
The text of her saying I would be incarcerated if she so much as lifted a figure shows malicious intent on her part. Since she had already spoken to the police and told them I wasn't a threat a week before and no other communication that would be considered out of the ordinary happened between that time. So what prompted her to go to the police then? (BESIDES fear of her ex fiancé knowing she cheated) LOL
She also lied to the police said I called her threatening her, this never occurred and phone records show this. (Lying to the police is a crime) She also lied to police about when she last saw me. (A crime) These threats and gun thing allegedly happened on Feb 11 as you have all seen but she was still talking to me and seeing me up until the 18th, the day I was arrested. ODD!
> As I mentioned in my original post, since I have
> never met any of the parties, I was not SURE
> whether the person there who I thought MIGHT be
> Misery was, indeed, Misery.
I'm sure you thought he was the heavy set guy sitting across from me by himself right? lol, no.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 02:13PM by lizzie.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the clarification, Lizzie...
>
> I agree with you that the bomb threat case against
> you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me
> off royally that you are in the situation you are
> in. How frightened we all should be that someone
> could be hauled to jail and forced to defend
> oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy
> "evidence..."
It's okay. I have my own evidence which is why I was let go on my own signature in the first place. Police and courts do not let anyone go free who has been deemed a serious threat to anyone. i.e alleged bomb threats/threatening someone with a firearm. Especially with my criminal history. Although this isn't what this thread is about this is the last thing I'll post about that situation. As anyone with half a brain can see what happened here, whether or not you "like me" or not!
Police already spoke to me and found no probable cause based on those texts that were posted here. After said person and I got into it and I threatened to tell her ex fiancé about her cheating with me and other people she decided to take this text message of a gun, crop it and tell police that I threatened her with it (Filing a false police report - criminal).
The text of her saying I would be incarcerated if she so much as lifted a figure shows malicious intent on her part. Since she had already spoken to the police and told them I wasn't a threat a week before and no other communication that would be considered out of the ordinary happened between that time. So what prompted her to go to the police then? (BESIDES fear of her ex fiancé knowing she cheated) LOL
She also lied to the police said I called her threatening her, this never occurred and phone records show this. (Lying to the police is a crime) She also lied to police about when she last saw me. (A crime) These threats and gun thing allegedly happened on Feb 11 as you have all seen but she was still talking to me and seeing me up until the 18th, the day I was arrested. ODD!
> As I mentioned in my original post, since I have
> never met any of the parties, I was not SURE
> whether the person there who I thought MIGHT be
> Misery was, indeed, Misery.
I'm sure you thought he was the heavy set guy sitting across from me by himself right? lol, no.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 02:13PM by lizzie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Toohey Sightings
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:36PM
2 cases Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mo, you and eesh keep treating all these cases
> like such a joke the judges will make you both the
> punchlines.
>
> also, you keep saying both cases surrounding your
> bomb threat and Katie's case, however records show
> you have 2 charges and she has none.
>
> you and eesh are not handling this wisely,
> everything is being documented and you have
> involved yourself inadvertently, you'll see don't
> worry. trust me soon enough, eventually you'll
> understand this post.
Your Megan Toohey is showing
-------------------------------------------------------
> mo, you and eesh keep treating all these cases
> like such a joke the judges will make you both the
> punchlines.
>
> also, you keep saying both cases surrounding your
> bomb threat and Katie's case, however records show
> you have 2 charges and she has none.
>
> you and eesh are not handling this wisely,
> everything is being documented and you have
> involved yourself inadvertently, you'll see don't
> worry. trust me soon enough, eventually you'll
> understand this post.
Your Megan Toohey is showing
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
omg wtf lol
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:37PM
Lmao, these two idiots have no idea what they're doing. Deer caught in headlights. I thought eesh was smarter than this. I was wrong. Damnnnnnn.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
why should she care?
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:37PM
She's a broke nog with no future.
If she gets sued she would not give a single fuck, no assets to speak of, no future so it's not a loss for her. Just look at the past due payment from 2012 in your picture.
Eesh seems a little more focused and cares more about his future, but he is still stupid for posting all the stuff he has. He should of STFU as soon as he got served. Whats the first thing he does? Post it here for everyone to see... smh.
If she gets sued she would not give a single fuck, no assets to speak of, no future so it's not a loss for her. Just look at the past due payment from 2012 in your picture.
Eesh seems a little more focused and cares more about his future, but he is still stupid for posting all the stuff he has. He should of STFU as soon as he got served. Whats the first thing he does? Post it here for everyone to see... smh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:40PM
lol
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:46PM by lizzie.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:46PM by lizzie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:40PM
Sued for....? LOL
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
omg wtf lol
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:41PM
why should she care? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She's a broke nog with no future.
>
> If she gets sued she would not give a single fuck,
> no assets to speak of, no future so it's not a
> loss for her. Just look at the past due payment
> from 2012 in your picture.
>
>
> Eesh seems a little more focused and cares more
> about his future, but he is still stupid for
> posting all the stuff he has. He should of STFU as
> soon as he got served. Whats the first thing he
> does? Post it here for everyone to see... smh.
Not only does he post getting served his first court date he says he didn't get served lmao. omg this is too much lol.
-------------------------------------------------------
> She's a broke nog with no future.
>
> If she gets sued she would not give a single fuck,
> no assets to speak of, no future so it's not a
> loss for her. Just look at the past due payment
> from 2012 in your picture.
>
>
> Eesh seems a little more focused and cares more
> about his future, but he is still stupid for
> posting all the stuff he has. He should of STFU as
> soon as he got served. Whats the first thing he
> does? Post it here for everyone to see... smh.
Not only does he post getting served his first court date he says he didn't get served lmao. omg this is too much lol.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:42PM
I don't want to disparage anyone.
I know some people here love Lizzie; some don't.
The charges Lizzie has faced (other than the seemingly bogus bomb threat charge) seem minor. They are so minor that they certainly would not cause me to make negative judgements about her character. Indeed, she seems like quite an intelligent young woman. People can grow and change. So let's not demonize her.
Where I DO agree with @2 cases, though, is that anyone who is facing legal or civil charges (whether that be Lizzie, Eesh, or anyone else), would be MOST wise to shutdown their social media activities until their cases are disposed of.
I say that, notwithstanding the fact that the posts that she and all of the others involved in the Papa Johns and Swatting sagas have provided me with countless hours of entertainment.
I know some people here love Lizzie; some don't.
The charges Lizzie has faced (other than the seemingly bogus bomb threat charge) seem minor. They are so minor that they certainly would not cause me to make negative judgements about her character. Indeed, she seems like quite an intelligent young woman. People can grow and change. So let's not demonize her.
Where I DO agree with @2 cases, though, is that anyone who is facing legal or civil charges (whether that be Lizzie, Eesh, or anyone else), would be MOST wise to shutdown their social media activities until their cases are disposed of.
I say that, notwithstanding the fact that the posts that she and all of the others involved in the Papa Johns and Swatting sagas have provided me with countless hours of entertainment.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not to mention...
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:42PM
GC11002182-00 WELLS, MONIQUE 06/21/2011 09:30 AM SALE, DISTRIBUTE MARIJUANA Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
GC14005210-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 08/28/2014 09:30 AM DISORDERLY CONDUCT Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
GC14005211-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 08/28/2014 09:30 AM OBSTRUCT JUSTICE THREAT/FORCE Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
GC14005212-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 09/08/2014 09:30 AM OBSTRUCT JUSTICE W/O FORCE Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
Nothing paid.
Aren't you worried about your credit? Don't you want to be able to buy a home? Get a driver license? Better your life?
PAST DUE
GC14005210-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 08/28/2014 09:30 AM DISORDERLY CONDUCT Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
GC14005211-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 08/28/2014 09:30 AM OBSTRUCT JUSTICE THREAT/FORCE Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
GC14005212-00 WELLS, MONIQUE DANETTE 09/08/2014 09:30 AM OBSTRUCT JUSTICE W/O FORCE Mark For Payment
PAST DUE
Nothing paid.
Aren't you worried about your credit? Don't you want to be able to buy a home? Get a driver license? Better your life?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:44PM
Why do you care what I do so much? lol my life my problems, worry about your own shit for once! >.<
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:47PM
I haven't spoken about the other case and won't. The other thing is public information. No one REALLY cares about me or what I'm doing or about Papa John's except ONE person.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
LIZZAy
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:54PM
Lizzie how the hell u get caught selling bud?? lol
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:55PM
LIZZAy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie how the hell u get caught selling bud?? lol
LOL funny story actually..
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie how the hell u get caught selling bud?? lol
LOL funny story actually..
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 01:57PM
From Lizzie:
>>I'm sure you thought he was the
>>heavy set guy sitting across from me
>>by himself right? lol, no.
Yes. I DID think that guy might be Misery....
It shows how wrong one can be....
>>I'm sure you thought he was the
>>heavy set guy sitting across from me
>>by himself right? lol, no.
Yes. I DID think that guy might be Misery....
It shows how wrong one can be....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:08PM
>>Hey do you know when the new court date?
As far as I know, no new court date has been set.
The court gave Eesh ten days to file either a response to the suit or a proper motion to quash, which would make that deadline March 27. I suspect that once those papers are filed, the wheels will be put into motion to set a date, which likely would be several weeks after that.
In the event that Eesh does not file either a response or another motion to quash within the ten day limit, though, I would imagine that Misery's attorney will file another motion for summary judgement. There would be some notice requirements for a hearing on such a motion, and so even then, I imagine we're talking about a couple of weeks after that, at the earliest, for a court date.
As far as I know, no new court date has been set.
The court gave Eesh ten days to file either a response to the suit or a proper motion to quash, which would make that deadline March 27. I suspect that once those papers are filed, the wheels will be put into motion to set a date, which likely would be several weeks after that.
In the event that Eesh does not file either a response or another motion to quash within the ten day limit, though, I would imagine that Misery's attorney will file another motion for summary judgement. There would be some notice requirements for a hearing on such a motion, and so even then, I imagine we're talking about a couple of weeks after that, at the earliest, for a court date.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nKPEw
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:11PM
sheriff kincaid's friends and family are on the indictment "panel" (as fx co gov calls it) - also postal (fed gov) workers
your indicted - that's a sure thing !
your indicted - that's a sure thing !
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9k3LK
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:12PM
being by suing the judge , the lawyers , and their family and friends for a fraudulent indictment
by showing they have a clear history for doing oppositely of the prescription of law
by showing they have a clear history for doing oppositely of the prescription of law
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
FFXU User
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:14PM
@CourthouseObserver:
Thank you for the detailed summary of what happened in the courtroom today. Very thorough and helpful. Did the judge what the next step will be and if there's date for that? I mean other than eesh responding to the suit within 10 days. Or is the next step predicated on his response?
Thank you for the detailed summary of what happened in the courtroom today. Very thorough and helpful. Did the judge what the next step will be and if there's date for that? I mean other than eesh responding to the suit within 10 days. Or is the next step predicated on his response?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
@ CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:18PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Correction:
>
> At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
> To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so
> I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
That was a very good write-up -- clearly written, and with a good selection of interesting details that brought the picture - the setting, the various characters, the drama - to life in my mind.
Well done. Seriously.
An experienced pro journalist would likely produce something more polished -- but, you know, maybe not a whole lot more polished if we were looking at a quickly prepared first draft as yet ungroomed by the tender ministrations of a style editor, and the writer's own revisions and emendations.
In short: You have a good eye, a good ear, and good sense of the overall picture. Perhaps most importantly, you have a feel for the DRAMA of the situation. Specifically, you show a very nice feel for the nuances and changes that occur in a fluid, unfolding drama.
AND you have the ability to synthesize all of that, and quickly translate it into fluent, readable, not unstylish prose. Although this was no great spectacle, your account made the "mini-drama" of this morning's events interesting and engaging. You brought it to life.
Your ability to perceive all these things, and convey them to the reader, demonstrates a gift for non-fiction storytelling -- for narrative journalism.
It demonstrates that you are a writer.
My honest opinion, for what it's worth.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Correction:
>
> At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
> To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And so
> I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
That was a very good write-up -- clearly written, and with a good selection of interesting details that brought the picture - the setting, the various characters, the drama - to life in my mind.
Well done. Seriously.
An experienced pro journalist would likely produce something more polished -- but, you know, maybe not a whole lot more polished if we were looking at a quickly prepared first draft as yet ungroomed by the tender ministrations of a style editor, and the writer's own revisions and emendations.
In short: You have a good eye, a good ear, and good sense of the overall picture. Perhaps most importantly, you have a feel for the DRAMA of the situation. Specifically, you show a very nice feel for the nuances and changes that occur in a fluid, unfolding drama.
AND you have the ability to synthesize all of that, and quickly translate it into fluent, readable, not unstylish prose. Although this was no great spectacle, your account made the "mini-drama" of this morning's events interesting and engaging. You brought it to life.
Your ability to perceive all these things, and convey them to the reader, demonstrates a gift for non-fiction storytelling -- for narrative journalism.
It demonstrates that you are a writer.
My honest opinion, for what it's worth.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
music to my ears
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:20PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
karma is a biatch
-------------------------------------------------------
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
karma is a biatch
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Jp3ht
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:22PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >>Hey do you know when the new court date?
>
> As far as I know, no new court date has been set.
>
>
> The court gave Eesh ten days to file either a
> response to the suit or a proper motion to quash,
> which would make that deadline March 27. I
> suspect that once those papers are filed, the
> wheels will be put into motion to set a date,
> which likely would be several weeks after that.
>
> In the event that Eesh does not file either a
> response or another motion to quash within the ten
> day limit, though, I would imagine that Misery's
> attorney will file another motion for summary
> judgement. There would be some notice
> requirements for a hearing on such a motion, and
> so even then, I imagine we're talking about a
> couple of weeks after that, at the earliest, for a
> court date.
What will happen, if it already hasn't happened, is that the clerk of the court will notice the case for a status conference at which the parties will pick a trial date. Those are held at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesdays or Thursdays, and are usually with just the clerk and with no judge. The parties will pick a trial date, which must be within one year of the filing date of the case, so it will be before the end of the year probably. The trial dates are usually set at least 4 or 5 months away because of the court's calendar. The parties will sign a pretrial order that sets certain dates for certain pretrial events/deadlines.
All this won't happen if he doesn't file a proper answer.
I have no problem with the OPs reporting, its very concise and detailed. Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an answer, as in this case, it's not a motion for summary judgment, it's a motion for default judgment, which is different. It's entirely possible though that the plaintiff's lawyer filed and argued for an SJ even though that's not correct.
-------------------------------------------------------
> >>Hey do you know when the new court date?
>
> As far as I know, no new court date has been set.
>
>
> The court gave Eesh ten days to file either a
> response to the suit or a proper motion to quash,
> which would make that deadline March 27. I
> suspect that once those papers are filed, the
> wheels will be put into motion to set a date,
> which likely would be several weeks after that.
>
> In the event that Eesh does not file either a
> response or another motion to quash within the ten
> day limit, though, I would imagine that Misery's
> attorney will file another motion for summary
> judgement. There would be some notice
> requirements for a hearing on such a motion, and
> so even then, I imagine we're talking about a
> couple of weeks after that, at the earliest, for a
> court date.
What will happen, if it already hasn't happened, is that the clerk of the court will notice the case for a status conference at which the parties will pick a trial date. Those are held at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesdays or Thursdays, and are usually with just the clerk and with no judge. The parties will pick a trial date, which must be within one year of the filing date of the case, so it will be before the end of the year probably. The trial dates are usually set at least 4 or 5 months away because of the court's calendar. The parties will sign a pretrial order that sets certain dates for certain pretrial events/deadlines.
All this won't happen if he doesn't file a proper answer.
I have no problem with the OPs reporting, its very concise and detailed. Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an answer, as in this case, it's not a motion for summary judgment, it's a motion for default judgment, which is different. It's entirely possible though that the plaintiff's lawyer filed and argued for an SJ even though that's not correct.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
@ Jp3ht
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:37PM
Jp3ht Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an answer,
> as in this case, it's not a motion for summary judgment,
> it's a motion for default judgment, which is different.
What becomes of plaintiff's right to pursue discovery in the event of either a successful motion for summary judgment, or a default judgment?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an answer,
> as in this case, it's not a motion for summary judgment,
> it's a motion for default judgment, which is different.
What becomes of plaintiff's right to pursue discovery in the event of either a successful motion for summary judgment, or a default judgment?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
live vid of mis in court
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:38PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9NPCC
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:42PM
@ Jp3ht Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jp3ht Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an
> answer,
> > as in this case, it's not a motion for summary
> judgment,
> > it's a motion for default judgment, which is
> different.
>
>
> What becomes of plaintiff's right to pursue
> discovery in the event of either a successful
> motion for summary judgment, or a default
> judgment?
If it's a default judgment, I think the plaintiff can still pursue discovery. The default judgment doesn't mean that you've proved your damages, and I think you can use discovery to put your damages case together. Summary judgment ends the case, if it's not partial summary judgment.
This isn't legal advice and I'm not a lawyer but I think this is how it goes.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jp3ht Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Usually though, if the defendant hasn't filed an
> answer,
> > as in this case, it's not a motion for summary
> judgment,
> > it's a motion for default judgment, which is
> different.
>
>
> What becomes of plaintiff's right to pursue
> discovery in the event of either a successful
> motion for summary judgment, or a default
> judgment?
If it's a default judgment, I think the plaintiff can still pursue discovery. The default judgment doesn't mean that you've proved your damages, and I think you can use discovery to put your damages case together. Summary judgment ends the case, if it's not partial summary judgment.
This isn't legal advice and I'm not a lawyer but I think this is how it goes.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fair settlement
()
Date: March 13, 2015 02:45PM
They should settle at $52,917
That is a fair price, $1 paid for every post eesh has made on this site.
That is a fair price, $1 paid for every post eesh has made on this site.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
enquiring minds
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:09PM
Is Misery handsome?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
foolish question
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:27PM
what is this lawsuit about?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:39PM
Jp3ht is absolutely right.
I meant default judgement; not summary judgement...
Thanks for catching that!
I meant default judgement; not summary judgement...
Thanks for catching that!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:42PM
Sigh
I'm hanging out on Ft Belvoir right now as traffic on 95s and Route 1 is clogged.
I'll post responses to all this when I get home tonight.
I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito. You are the Lamb Center troll , and I'll explain how I know this when I get home. You stuck out like a sore thumb though as you were obviously out of place in a courtroom setting. Next time you want to scout out make sure you aren't in an a near empty courtroom where your staring and out of place appearance is obvious.
Talk to you tonight old man.
I'm hanging out on Ft Belvoir right now as traffic on 95s and Route 1 is clogged.
I'll post responses to all this when I get home tonight.
I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito. You are the Lamb Center troll , and I'll explain how I know this when I get home. You stuck out like a sore thumb though as you were obviously out of place in a courtroom setting. Next time you want to scout out make sure you aren't in an a near empty courtroom where your staring and out of place appearance is obvious.
Talk to you tonight old man.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Homina Homina Homina
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:46PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sigh
>
> I'm hanging out on Ft Belvoir right now as traffic
> on 95s and Route 1 is clogged.
>
> I'll post responses to all this when I get home
> tonight.
>
> I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito.
> You are the Lamb Center troll , and I'll explain
> how I know this when I get home. You stuck out
> like a sore thumb though as you were obviously out
> of place in a courtroom setting. Next time you
> want to scout out make sure you aren't in an a
> near empty courtroom where your staring and out of
> place appearance is obvious.
>
> Talk to you tonight old man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGprRpuXFj0
^^^^^
eesh today at court. Homina Homina Homina!!!
But your honor, I'm a veteran going to school on GI Bill money. I get to stalk people and ruin their lives!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sigh
>
> I'm hanging out on Ft Belvoir right now as traffic
> on 95s and Route 1 is clogged.
>
> I'll post responses to all this when I get home
> tonight.
>
> I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito.
> You are the Lamb Center troll , and I'll explain
> how I know this when I get home. You stuck out
> like a sore thumb though as you were obviously out
> of place in a courtroom setting. Next time you
> want to scout out make sure you aren't in an a
> near empty courtroom where your staring and out of
> place appearance is obvious.
>
> Talk to you tonight old man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGprRpuXFj0
^^^^^
eesh today at court. Homina Homina Homina!!!
But your honor, I'm a veteran going to school on GI Bill money. I get to stalk people and ruin their lives!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
LegalAidForEesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 03:55PM
Eesh,
Non-profit low or pro-bono legal services:
http://www.goodsamaritanadvocates.org/
Some others I've checked only take cases related to housing, taxes, debts, etc.
You might want to call to see if they will consider representing you, if you're tight on dollars.
Just a thought.
Non-profit low or pro-bono legal services:
http://www.goodsamaritanadvocates.org/
Some others I've checked only take cases related to housing, taxes, debts, etc.
You might want to call to see if they will consider representing you, if you're tight on dollars.
Just a thought.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:02PM
Eesh....
I am not against you.
But I have never been anywhere near the Lamb Center. The only thing I know about it is that it is mentioned occasionally on this site. And I think I stopped reading those posts a couple of years ago because they were so repetitive and stupid.
I have never posted anything about the Lamb Center.
And so now that you have been told this, if you assert it again, you will be asserting a lie and that lie would be defamation.
Don't make an innocent person who has nothing against you an enemy by defaming him. That won't help you in this suit or in any other suit that might eventually be brought against you.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:03PM by CourthouseObserver.
I am not against you.
But I have never been anywhere near the Lamb Center. The only thing I know about it is that it is mentioned occasionally on this site. And I think I stopped reading those posts a couple of years ago because they were so repetitive and stupid.
I have never posted anything about the Lamb Center.
And so now that you have been told this, if you assert it again, you will be asserting a lie and that lie would be defamation.
Don't make an innocent person who has nothing against you an enemy by defaming him. That won't help you in this suit or in any other suit that might eventually be brought against you.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:03PM by CourthouseObserver.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9mNPF
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:04PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> blah blah grrrrrrr blah blah
Ex hypothesi, if CourthouseObserver® is "the Lamb Center troll," he had a much better day today than you did.
That is, a cogent report (him) vs. a stumblebum fuckup (you).
Where the hubris comes from, gods only know.
But your wings have melted and you're descending at a very rapid clip, sans parachute.
^Genius at work
-------------------------------------------------------
> blah blah grrrrrrr blah blah
Ex hypothesi, if CourthouseObserver® is "the Lamb Center troll," he had a much better day today than you did.
That is, a cogent report (him) vs. a stumblebum fuckup (you).
Where the hubris comes from, gods only know.
But your wings have melted and you're descending at a very rapid clip, sans parachute.
^Genius at work
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Perry Masonary
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:07PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> From Lizzie:
>
> >>I'm sure you thought he was the
> >>heavy set guy sitting across from me
> >>by himself right? lol, no.
>
> Yes. I DID think that guy might be Misery....
>
> It shows how wrong one can be....
Sir, are you an attorney? If not, you've obviously spent time in a courtroom (which could mean good or bad things) or you learned a boatload of legal BS from Google.
If you are a lawyer, how about stepping up to the plate and helping out an FU brother and represent eesh pro bono (not the guy from U2 for the morons here).
What could it hurt and you might make a name for yourself like Mark Geragos or Jose Biaz, Casey Anthony's lawyer or Mark O'Mara, George Zimmerman's lawyer. Who knows. You could end up with your own TV show. But you definitely wont get paid by eesh.
-------------------------------------------------------
> From Lizzie:
>
> >>I'm sure you thought he was the
> >>heavy set guy sitting across from me
> >>by himself right? lol, no.
>
> Yes. I DID think that guy might be Misery....
>
> It shows how wrong one can be....
Sir, are you an attorney? If not, you've obviously spent time in a courtroom (which could mean good or bad things) or you learned a boatload of legal BS from Google.
If you are a lawyer, how about stepping up to the plate and helping out an FU brother and represent eesh pro bono (not the guy from U2 for the morons here).
What could it hurt and you might make a name for yourself like Mark Geragos or Jose Biaz, Casey Anthony's lawyer or Mark O'Mara, George Zimmerman's lawyer. Who knows. You could end up with your own TV show. But you definitely wont get paid by eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:11PM
Eesh...
One last thing...
Unless you have been in a courtroom a lot as a defendant (which I hope for your sake isn't the case), how would YOU know when someone looks like he or she is "obviously out of place in a courtroom setting?"
I assure you. I know my way around a courtroom. And not as a defendant.
Again. I am NOT your enemy. But if you defame me again, I will not sit idly by and allow you to do so with inpunity.
One last thing...
Unless you have been in a courtroom a lot as a defendant (which I hope for your sake isn't the case), how would YOU know when someone looks like he or she is "obviously out of place in a courtroom setting?"
I assure you. I know my way around a courtroom. And not as a defendant.
Again. I am NOT your enemy. But if you defame me again, I will not sit idly by and allow you to do so with inpunity.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
omgwtfbbq!
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:16PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito.
> You are the Lamb Center troll
> Talk to you tonight old man.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I will say to the OP that you aren't so incognito.
> You are the Lamb Center troll
> Talk to you tonight old man.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:17PM
Lizzie:
I am interested in this as both a First Amendment case and a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying case. Obviously, Eesh would be a sympathetic character from a First Amendment perspective for those who are defenders of freedom of speech but an unsympathetic character from a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying perspective for those who are defenders of people who feel bullied or stalked.
As entertaining as all of this is, it presents some fascinating legal issues.
Let me think about it.
I'm not sure I would be the best person to represent Eesh. But I might know people who would be interested in defending him on on a Pro Bono basis.
PLEASE advise him, though, to stop attacking people on this site, at least during the duration of this case. It just doesn't help him.
And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I would be watching YOUR every post to see how I could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about what Eesh has told you about the whole situation. And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
Eesh should not be talking to ANYONE about this stuff except his attorney, his psychologist or psychiatrist, or his spouse (if he has one), for they are the only ones who would be precluded from being hauled into a courtroom (or a law office, in the case of a deposition) as a witness in this case.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:24PM by CourthouseObserver.
I am interested in this as both a First Amendment case and a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying case. Obviously, Eesh would be a sympathetic character from a First Amendment perspective for those who are defenders of freedom of speech but an unsympathetic character from a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying perspective for those who are defenders of people who feel bullied or stalked.
As entertaining as all of this is, it presents some fascinating legal issues.
Let me think about it.
I'm not sure I would be the best person to represent Eesh. But I might know people who would be interested in defending him on on a Pro Bono basis.
PLEASE advise him, though, to stop attacking people on this site, at least during the duration of this case. It just doesn't help him.
And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I would be watching YOUR every post to see how I could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about what Eesh has told you about the whole situation. And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
Eesh should not be talking to ANYONE about this stuff except his attorney, his psychologist or psychiatrist, or his spouse (if he has one), for they are the only ones who would be precluded from being hauled into a courtroom (or a law office, in the case of a deposition) as a witness in this case.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:24PM by CourthouseObserver.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
BeenThere
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:20PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh...
>
> One last thing...
>
> Unless you have been in a courtroom a lot as a
> defendant (which I hope for your sake isn't the
> case), how would YOU know when someone looks like
> he or she is "obviously out of place in a
> courtroom setting?"
>
> I assure you. I know my way around a courtroom.
> And not as a defendant.
>
> Again. I am NOT your enemy. But if you defame me
> again, I will not sit idly by and allow you to do
> so with inpunity.
Ever been to the Circuit Court
Rooms in Fairfax? They are modern and nice, but smaller than a colonial chapel and anyone else in the room not related to your case is usually with only 1 other case, per scheduling. (You can't lose yourself in the crowd. It's like, "What's with the guy sitting over there all alone?")
I understand why Eesh even if it is his 1st time @ FFX Circuit, would see this FFXU "court reporter" as being out of place.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh...
>
> One last thing...
>
> Unless you have been in a courtroom a lot as a
> defendant (which I hope for your sake isn't the
> case), how would YOU know when someone looks like
> he or she is "obviously out of place in a
> courtroom setting?"
>
> I assure you. I know my way around a courtroom.
> And not as a defendant.
>
> Again. I am NOT your enemy. But if you defame me
> again, I will not sit idly by and allow you to do
> so with inpunity.
Ever been to the Circuit Court
Rooms in Fairfax? They are modern and nice, but smaller than a colonial chapel and anyone else in the room not related to your case is usually with only 1 other case, per scheduling. (You can't lose yourself in the crowd. It's like, "What's with the guy sitting over there all alone?")
I understand why Eesh even if it is his 1st time @ FFX Circuit, would see this FFXU "court reporter" as being out of place.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nKpPU
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:22PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> I am interested in this as both a First Amendment
> case and a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying case.
> Obviously, Eesh would be a sympathetic character
> from a First Amendment perspective for those who
> are defenders of freedom of speech but an
> unsympathetic character from a Cyber
> Stalking/Cyber Bullying perspective for those who
> are defenders of people who feel bullied or
> stalked.
>
> As entertaining as all of this is, it presents
> some fascinating legal issues.
>
> Let me think about it.
>
> I'm not sure I would be the best person to
> represent Eesh. But I might know people who would
> be interested in taking him on on a Pro Bono
> basis.
lizzie didn't write that you stupid fuck, Perry Masonary did.
That's just what eesh needs, a lawyer who can't read!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> I am interested in this as both a First Amendment
> case and a Cyber Stalking/Cyber Bullying case.
> Obviously, Eesh would be a sympathetic character
> from a First Amendment perspective for those who
> are defenders of freedom of speech but an
> unsympathetic character from a Cyber
> Stalking/Cyber Bullying perspective for those who
> are defenders of people who feel bullied or
> stalked.
>
> As entertaining as all of this is, it presents
> some fascinating legal issues.
>
> Let me think about it.
>
> I'm not sure I would be the best person to
> represent Eesh. But I might know people who would
> be interested in taking him on on a Pro Bono
> basis.
lizzie didn't write that you stupid fuck, Perry Masonary did.
That's just what eesh needs, a lawyer who can't read!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:26PM
Better a lawyer who can't read than none at all...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:27PM
I have no need to "lose myself" or go "incognito..."
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
@ CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:34PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And so now that you have been told this, if you
> assert it again, you will be asserting a lie and
> that lie would be defamation.
No, it wouldn't.
Because his remark would be directed against "CourthouseObserver," which (or who) is not a legally cognizable person.
And frankly nobody except eesh gives a shit if you're from the Lamb Center, or you're a USSC law clerk taking a convenient sick day.
The only thing that matters is that you wrote an excellent report, and I hope you'll write another.
Here, btw, is the correct reply to eesh in these and indeed in most circumstances: Go Fuck Yourself.
And if that motherfucker - I mean "eesh" - gives the slightest intimation of any threatening behavior or even GRATUITOUSLY OBNOXIOUS behavior aimed at you, ONLINE or OFFLINE, send an email to Phil Leiser, *and* to the judge as well.
The judge could have defaulted this prick, but instead she cut him a major break.
If he acts out like a dick, as is his wont and habitual practice, it will not go well for him.
She will, quite properly, be highly vexed by such ill behavior, and may indeed "hand him over to the guard responsible for punishing prisoners, until he has paid the whole debt."
I refer of course to the Parable of the Wicked Servant, which "eesh" exemplifies, and which he ignores at his own peril.
-------------------------------------------------------
> And so now that you have been told this, if you
> assert it again, you will be asserting a lie and
> that lie would be defamation.
No, it wouldn't.
Because his remark would be directed against "CourthouseObserver," which (or who) is not a legally cognizable person.
And frankly nobody except eesh gives a shit if you're from the Lamb Center, or you're a USSC law clerk taking a convenient sick day.
The only thing that matters is that you wrote an excellent report, and I hope you'll write another.
Here, btw, is the correct reply to eesh in these and indeed in most circumstances: Go Fuck Yourself.
And if that motherfucker - I mean "eesh" - gives the slightest intimation of any threatening behavior or even GRATUITOUSLY OBNOXIOUS behavior aimed at you, ONLINE or OFFLINE, send an email to Phil Leiser, *and* to the judge as well.
The judge could have defaulted this prick, but instead she cut him a major break.
If he acts out like a dick, as is his wont and habitual practice, it will not go well for him.
She will, quite properly, be highly vexed by such ill behavior, and may indeed "hand him over to the guard responsible for punishing prisoners, until he has paid the whole debt."
I refer of course to the Parable of the Wicked Servant, which "eesh" exemplifies, and which he ignores at his own peril.
Jesus said,
The kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. When he began to settle accounts, they brought to him a servant who owed him ten thousand bags of gold.
Because the servant didn’t have enough to pay it back, the master ordered that he should be sold, along with his wife and children and everything he had, and that the proceeds should be used as payment.
But the servant fell down, kneeled before him, and said, ‘Please, be patient with me, and I’ll pay you back.’
The master had compassion on that servant, released him, and forgave the loan.
When that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him one hundred coins. He grabbed him around the throat and said, ‘Pay me back what you owe me.’
Then his fellow servant fell down and begged him, ‘Be patient with me, and I’ll pay you back.’ But he refused. Instead, he threw him into prison until he paid back his debt.
When his fellow servants saw what happened, they were deeply offended. They came and told their master all that happened.
His master called the first servant and said, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you appealed to me. Shouldn’t you also have mercy on your fellow servant, just as I had mercy on you?’
His master was furious and handed him over to the guard responsible for punishing prisoners, until he had paid the whole debt.
—Matthew 18:23-34
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
BeenThere
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:39PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have no need to "lose myself" or go
> "incognito..."
You're correct the court room is a publice place. I didn't mean it as an insult.
Thank you for observing for the forum and passing along the 411.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have no need to "lose myself" or go
> "incognito..."
You're correct the court room is a publice place. I didn't mean it as an insult.
Thank you for observing for the forum and passing along the 411.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Miz Whiz
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:39PM
vexed or Vexxed?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:42PM
LMAO at defamation old man, and yes, you stuck out like a sore thumb. Tiny courtroom with barely anyone in there, yes you got noticed. I can remember in 2010 when Cary had his legal trouble, a mysterious poster described his personal appearance in court down to the wrinkles in his shirt. Now you are describing lizzie down to the shoes she wore and a full detail of what Misery's lawyer looked like.
WTF is wrong with you?
WTF is wrong with you?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
AdvicetoEesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:42PM
If you don't have an attorney -- get one by COB tomorrow to get help with replying to the complaint within the deadline.
If you win (if it is dismissed) you can sue at a later date for attorney's fees you incurred and recoop your money. The option would be to default or try to rep. "Pro Se" yourself again and you would end up owing the amount sued for in most instances. Get crackin'.
If you win (if it is dismissed) you can sue at a later date for attorney's fees you incurred and recoop your money. The option would be to default or try to rep. "Pro Se" yourself again and you would end up owing the amount sued for in most instances. Get crackin'.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:47PM
The black guy in the back said:
And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I would be watching YOUR every post to see how I could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about what Eesh has told you about the whole situation. And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
Edit: btw I didn't even say anything so idk why you're responding with my name. For once I haven't posted anon lol
---
Okay brotha. That's fine and all seeing as how eesh isn't stupid and hasn't told me anything at all..
...oooooo
.
..
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:54PM by lizzie.
And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I would be watching YOUR every post to see how I could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about what Eesh has told you about the whole situation. And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
Edit: btw I didn't even say anything so idk why you're responding with my name. For once I haven't posted anon lol
---
Okay brotha. That's fine and all seeing as how eesh isn't stupid and hasn't told me anything at all..
...oooooo
.
..
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 04:54PM by lizzie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:53PM
As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the OP's reporting, he should have spent more time listening to what was being said, and less time noting what we wore. None of that occured as described, I'll elaborate when I get home.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:53PM
As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the OP's reporting, he should have spent more time listening to what was being said, and less time noting what we wore. None of that occured as described, I'll elaborate when I get home.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:53PM
As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the OP's reporting, he should have spent more time listening to what was being said, and less time noting what we wore. None of that occured as described, I'll elaborate when I get home.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:53PM
To Eesh....
I hope this is my last message to you...
Why are you so angry at me? And why are you resorting to name calling?
I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or not; clearly, given the name you have made up in an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think I was. But I could care less if you or anyone else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal community that 90 percent of the people in the courtroom know me and I know them.
Dude... The court will see this website. You are in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for heaven's sake.
Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand why you insist on treating me that way.
Good luck... And get some legal representation!
I hope this is my last message to you...
Why are you so angry at me? And why are you resorting to name calling?
I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or not; clearly, given the name you have made up in an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think I was. But I could care less if you or anyone else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal community that 90 percent of the people in the courtroom know me and I know them.
Dude... The court will see this website. You are in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for heaven's sake.
Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand why you insist on treating me that way.
Good luck... And get some legal representation!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:53PM
In other news you wouldn't believe who I just saw LMFAO!
Oh what a day! Happy Friday the 13th!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Oh what a day! Happy Friday the 13th!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:56PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To Eesh....
>
> I hope this is my last message to you...
>
> Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> resorting to name calling?
>
> I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or
> not; clearly, given the name you have made up in
> an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think
> I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any
> courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to
> do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> community that 90 percent of the people in the
> courtroom know me and I know them.
>
> Dude... The court will see this website. You are
> in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> heaven's sake.
>
> Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> why you insist on treating me that way.
>
> Good luck... And get some legal representation!
No, you are a fucking creepy old man that enjoys hanging out in courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or something.
-------------------------------------------------------
> To Eesh....
>
> I hope this is my last message to you...
>
> Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> resorting to name calling?
>
> I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or
> not; clearly, given the name you have made up in
> an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think
> I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any
> courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to
> do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> community that 90 percent of the people in the
> courtroom know me and I know them.
>
> Dude... The court will see this website. You are
> in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> heaven's sake.
>
> Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> why you insist on treating me that way.
>
> Good luck... And get some legal representation!
No, you are a fucking creepy old man that enjoys hanging out in courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or something.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:58PM
lol clearly our lives are these people's soap operas. Yet we are the ones with no lives but they come here all day and night to see what we are up to and haha eesh I told you SOMEONE was going to be there man!
#teamnolife
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
#teamnolife
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I love apology boobs
()
Date: March 13, 2015 04:59PM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In other news you wouldn't believe who I just saw
> LMFAO!
>
> Oh what a day! Happy Friday the 13th!
Katie?
-------------------------------------------------------
> In other news you wouldn't believe who I just saw
> LMFAO!
>
> Oh what a day! Happy Friday the 13th!
Katie?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:00PM
I can't comment.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tables turned
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:01PM
Lol the internet troll gets trolled while being sued. Oh the irony is too thick to comprehend.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I love apology boobs
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:02PM
You can, as long as you werent within 100 feet of her
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:02PM
Papa John's did finally get their sign fixed though!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
who are you
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:03PM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol clearly our lives are these people's soap
> operas. Yet we are the ones with no lives but they
> come here all day and night to see what we are up
> to and haha eesh I told you SOMEONE was going to
> be there man!
>
> #teamnolife
Who are you again? Oh thats right you're that little boy. Shouldnt you be out shopping for skittles?
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol clearly our lives are these people's soap
> operas. Yet we are the ones with no lives but they
> come here all day and night to see what we are up
> to and haha eesh I told you SOMEONE was going to
> be there man!
>
> #teamnolife
Who are you again? Oh thats right you're that little boy. Shouldnt you be out shopping for skittles?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:03PM
I love apology boobs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can, as long as you werent within 100 feet of
> her
lol! Well that presents a huge problem when she has to walk past my house to go to work now doesn't it?
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can, as long as you werent within 100 feet of
> her
lol! Well that presents a huge problem when she has to walk past my house to go to work now doesn't it?
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I love apology boobs
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:09PM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> lol! Well that presents a huge problem when she
> has to walk past my house to go to work now
> doesn't it?
If she lived within 100 feet of my house I would be fucking her every night, sometimes twice a night!
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> lol! Well that presents a huge problem when she
> has to walk past my house to go to work now
> doesn't it?
If she lived within 100 feet of my house I would be fucking her every night, sometimes twice a night!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:11PM
Hmmkay..and you see where that got me LOL
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
cK4yN
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:11PM
Some Idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in 2010 when Cary had his legal trouble, a
> mysterious poster described his personal
> appearance in court down to the wrinkles in his
> shirt.
Can a brother hook me up with a link to the above-referenced 2010 report, and/or other posts by CourthouseObserver® in his current or former incarnations?
To clarify: me = fan, not stalker/hater/eesh
> WTF is wrong with you?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
=========
@ ANYBODY
-------------------------------------------------------
> in 2010 when Cary had his legal trouble, a
> mysterious poster described his personal
> appearance in court down to the wrinkles in his
> shirt.
Can a brother hook me up with a link to the above-referenced 2010 report, and/or other posts by CourthouseObserver® in his current or former incarnations?
To clarify: me = fan, not stalker/hater/eesh
> WTF is wrong with you?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as the people frothing at the mouth at the
> OP's reporting
=========
@ ANYBODY
What's the name of the judge who presided today?
And her email if you've got one.
Thanks!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:12PM
Old Town is nice this evening.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:13PM
The bus filled with all the FFXUG posters
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WujTJ
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:15PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Old Town is nice this evening.
I thought you were stuck on 95 @ Ft Belvoir?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Old Town is nice this evening.
I thought you were stuck on 95 @ Ft Belvoir?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The FU Tour Bus!
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:21PM
The Fairfax Underground Tour Bus!
What a great idea!
What a great idea!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:21PM
It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir and travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die down until at least 9 PM.
Blessed are the murderous.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
get out
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:23PM
Get out of our beloved county you degenerate.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tour bus
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:24PM
That looks like a jury tour bus to go see a crime scene.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
W3ed6
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:24PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir and
> travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die down
> until at least 9 PM.
It is.
Were you giving some thought to jumping into the Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic for 50 miles.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir and
> travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die down
> until at least 9 PM.
It is.
Were you giving some thought to jumping into the Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic for 50 miles.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Miz hater
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:24PM
Still there? I'll swing by.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Jumper
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:25PM
W3ed6 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir and
> > travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die
> down
> > until at least 9 PM.
>
> It is.
>
> Were you giving some thought to jumping into the
> Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the
> WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic
> for 50 miles.
Not high enough to ensure death. It's only 70 feet high. More likely just some broken bones.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir and
> > travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die
> down
> > until at least 9 PM.
>
> It is.
>
> Were you giving some thought to jumping into the
> Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the
> WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic
> for 50 miles.
Not high enough to ensure death. It's only 70 feet high. More likely just some broken bones.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Spirit of Eesh, Blowback Edition
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:28PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Old Town is nice this evening.
Let's learn how to resize pics before you post anymore, okay?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Old Town is nice this evening.
Let's learn how to resize pics before you post anymore, okay?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
better call saul
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:30PM
this is all very troubling for me. some old guy going to eesh's trial, the simple fact that eesh had to go to trial for "bullying" a grown man on a niche website on the internet, lizzie being dressed up nicely, lizzie still not being my gf, none of this is comfortable for me.
I am a maelstrom of discontent and I've gotta tell you, I've had just about enough of this bullshit
I am a maelstrom of discontent and I've gotta tell you, I've had just about enough of this bullshit
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
freedom lover
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:31PM
What better way to enjoy your freedom after nearly perjuring yourself than sitting by the water.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hK67m
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:34PM
Jumper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> W3ed6 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir
> and
> > > travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die
> > down
> > > until at least 9 PM.
> >
> > It is.
> >
> > Were you giving some thought to jumping into
> the
> > Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest
> the
> > WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop
> traffic
> > for 50 miles.
>
>
> Not high enough to ensure death. It's only 70 feet
> high. More likely just some broken bones.
Knocked unconscious and drowning works. Not to mention he'll shit himself on the way down.
-------------------------------------------------------
> W3ed6 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > It's actually possible to leave Ft Belvoir
> and
> > > travel to Old Town. Weekend traffic won't die
> > down
> > > until at least 9 PM.
> >
> > It is.
> >
> > Were you giving some thought to jumping into
> the
> > Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest
> the
> > WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop
> traffic
> > for 50 miles.
>
>
> Not high enough to ensure death. It's only 70 feet
> high. More likely just some broken bones.
Knocked unconscious and drowning works. Not to mention he'll shit himself on the way down.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I know where you are
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:39PM
Still sitting in front of the Torpedo Factory?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
take a picture
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:44PM
Take a picture
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Arson
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:45PM
I know where you are Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still sitting in front of the Torpedo Factory?
That burned down last month
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still sitting in front of the Torpedo Factory?
That burned down last month
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CSI
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:45PM
tour bus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That looks like a jury tour bus to go see a crime
> scene.
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> That looks like a jury tour bus to go see a crime
> scene.
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Old Man
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:47PM
Miz Whiz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> vexed or Vexxed?
Isn't he a plaintiff too?
-------------------------------------------------------
> vexed or Vexxed?
Isn't he a plaintiff too?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
XeXjG
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:48PM
Was TheNorthman there?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Mind blown
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:50PM
What if TheNorthman was really court room reporter?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
7HyyL
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:50PM
I have not even read the first post and scan down to see lizzie is here shitting all over the place. Please go away so we can enjoy the case at hand.
Signed
Everyone on FFXU
Signed
Everyone on FFXU
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stabitha
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:52PM
What's up with the huge clit?
Im really interested now!
Attachments:
Im really interested now!
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
yeah bitch
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:53PM
Yeah bitch get lost.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
yeah bitch
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:53PM
Yeah bitch get lost.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Mo fuglynique
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:55PM
Lizzie no one cares about you this is between eesh and misery. Leave you attention whore.
And yes you guys wasting your time and money and continuing to do the stupid things you do is great entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at you not with you.
Going to court to watch this great soap opera is creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS said he would pay to watch this shit.
Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old town, you're going to need that money.
And yes you guys wasting your time and money and continuing to do the stupid things you do is great entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at you not with you.
Going to court to watch this great soap opera is creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS said he would pay to watch this shit.
Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old town, you're going to need that money.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dpjbJ
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:56PM
Stabitha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's up with the huge clit?
>
> Im really interested now!
((|))
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's up with the huge clit?
>
> Im really interested now!
((|))
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Gerry's Kids
()
Date: March 13, 2015 05:58PM
Anyone see Gerrymanderer2 there?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
PnMYG
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:15PM
CourtObserver
Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks he knows who is posting anon, it is like a sickness.
Glad you registered your user name, so we can watch this drama unfold through a reputable poster.
If you have the info? Is this just the small case between misery and eesh or is it all of them combined - family etc...?
Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks he knows who is posting anon, it is like a sickness.
Glad you registered your user name, so we can watch this drama unfold through a reputable poster.
If you have the info? Is this just the small case between misery and eesh or is it all of them combined - family etc...?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
i'm misery/Eli/Northman/chuck
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:27PM
PnMYG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourtObserver
>
> Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore
> eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks
> he knows who is posting anon, it is like a
> sickness.
+10000
I only post anon and have been told by eesh that I'm some registered poster multiple times.
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourtObserver
>
> Thanks for posting the details - I would ignore
> eesh as he seems very paranoid and ALWAYS thinks
> he knows who is posting anon, it is like a
> sickness.
+10000
I only post anon and have been told by eesh that I'm some registered poster multiple times.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:51PM
Thanks for the support to all who have offered it!
I think I will take your advice and ignore the negativity.
I happened to have a case at the courthouse today that was delayed, and so I was able to check into the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this time whether I will be around and available on the next court date. I DO have a day job and paying clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe and report.
To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no consolidation of this case with any other(s).
To those asking about whether I saw any other Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I would have no idea what any of them look like (other than people who put their pictures up or who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of the people there, and they were almost all attorneys who had business before the court. I only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an older woman.
Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening. I'll check back in late tonight to see if there are any other questions people have that I can answer.
I think I will take your advice and ignore the negativity.
I happened to have a case at the courthouse today that was delayed, and so I was able to check into the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this time whether I will be around and available on the next court date. I DO have a day job and paying clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe and report.
To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no consolidation of this case with any other(s).
To those asking about whether I saw any other Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I would have no idea what any of them look like (other than people who put their pictures up or who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of the people there, and they were almost all attorneys who had business before the court. I only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an older woman.
Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening. I'll check back in late tonight to see if there are any other questions people have that I can answer.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
we all appreciate it!
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:54PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
its a man baby
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:55PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and an older woman.
That was actually Vexxed
-------------------------------------------------------
> and an older woman.
That was actually Vexxed
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
faggot much
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:57PM
Did he look like a faggot in person? Would you say thats a cocksucker right there if you saw him?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
degenerate couple
()
Date: March 13, 2015 06:58PM
Mo fuglynique Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie no one cares about you this is between eesh
> and misery. Leave you attention whore.
>
>
> And yes you guys wasting your time and money and
> continuing to do the stupid things you do is great
> entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at
> you not with you.
>
>
> Going to court to watch this great soap opera is
> creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to
> stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS
> said he would pay to watch this shit.
>
> Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old
> town, you're going to need that money.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie no one cares about you this is between eesh
> and misery. Leave you attention whore.
>
>
> And yes you guys wasting your time and money and
> continuing to do the stupid things you do is great
> entertainment. Thx for the lulz. We're laughing at
> you not with you.
>
>
> Going to court to watch this great soap opera is
> creepy? But driving from Richmond to sterling to
> stalk someone isn't? Even a public leader BrianS
> said he would pay to watch this shit.
>
> Time to lawyer up, don't spend too much in old
> town, you're going to need that money.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
They look like nice people there
()
Date: March 13, 2015 07:10PM
Both lizzie and eesh are a part of the thread as made by the OP and another poster.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
two idiots
()
Date: March 13, 2015 07:19PM
Just look at those two idiots in that pic. Theyre posing for a pic because they think theyre cool on a website going to a court hearing together because one of them is getting sued. Its the epitome of stupidity.
I bet they thought lizzie would be a witness crucial to eeshs defense lmao.
I bet they thought lizzie would be a witness crucial to eeshs defense lmao.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stabitha
()
Date: March 13, 2015 07:20PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the support to all who have offered
> it!
>
> I think I will take your advice and ignore the
> negativity.
>
> I happened to have a case at the courthouse today
> that was delayed, and so I was able to check into
> the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this
> time whether I will be around and available on the
> next court date. I DO have a day job and paying
> clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly
> feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe
> and report.
>
> To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery
> v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no
> consolidation of this case with any other(s).
>
> To those asking about whether I saw any other
> Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I
> would have no idea what any of them look like
> (other than people who put their pictures up or
> who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that
> many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of
> the people there, and they were almost all
> attorneys who had business before the court. I
> only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh
> and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I
> mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but
> who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an
> older woman.
>
> Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am
> off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening.
> I'll check back in late tonight to see if there
> are any other questions people have that I can
> answer.
Why wont you help eesh with his legal pleadings etc.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the support to all who have offered
> it!
>
> I think I will take your advice and ignore the
> negativity.
>
> I happened to have a case at the courthouse today
> that was delayed, and so I was able to check into
> the courtroom this morning. I cannot know at this
> time whether I will be around and available on the
> next court date. I DO have a day job and paying
> clients, after all. But if so, I'll certainly
> feel free to drop into the courtroom to observe
> and report.
>
> To PnMYG, today's hearing was just on the Misery
> v. Eesh case. As far as I know, there has been no
> consolidation of this case with any other(s).
>
> To those asking about whether I saw any other
> Fairfax Underground posters in the courtroom, I
> would have no idea what any of them look like
> (other than people who put their pictures up or
> who have had their pictures put up). I doubt that
> many, if any, were there, though. I knew most of
> the people there, and they were almost all
> attorneys who had business before the court. I
> only saw two non-lawyers there (other than Eesh
> and Lizzie). One was a young heavyset man who I
> mistakenly thought at the time might be Misery but
> who Lizzie has since said was not him, and an
> older woman.
>
> Well... It has been a brutal work week, and I am
> off now to enjoy a fun, drama-free Friday evening.
> I'll check back in late tonight to see if there
> are any other questions people have that I can
> answer.
Why wont you help eesh with his legal pleadings etc.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dJpmD
()
Date: March 13, 2015 07:27PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 07:55PM
dJpmD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
> g>
Amazing how this post made the thread come to a screeching halt.
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
> g>
Amazing how this post made the thread come to a screeching halt.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tggg
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:08PM
When are you gouing back ?
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dJpmD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
>
> >
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
>
> > g>
>
>
> Amazing how this post made the thread come to a
> screeching halt.
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dJpmD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
>
> >
> hp?2,file=174671,filename=william_moreno_arrest.jp
>
> > g>
>
>
> Amazing how this post made the thread come to a
> screeching halt.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:13PM
They look like nice people there Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both lizzie and eesh are a part of the thread as
> made by the OP and Megan Toohey*
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both lizzie and eesh are a part of the thread as
> made by the OP and Megan Toohey*
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:20PM
Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have claimed harassment for being in the same county as her.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
wtf dude?
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:24PM
eesh Wrote
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To Eesh....
> >
> > I hope this is my last message to you...
> >
> > Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> > resorting to name calling?
> >
> > I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb
> or
> > not; clearly, given the name you have made up
> in
> > an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you
> think
> > I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> > else knows who I am. I have a right to be in
> any
> > courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around
> to
> > do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> > community that 90 percent of the people in the
> > courtroom know me and I know them.
> >
> > Dude... The court will see this website. You
> are
> > in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> > heaven's sake.
> >
> > Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> > why you insist on treating me that way.
> >
> > Good luck... And get some legal representation!
>
>
>
> No, you are a fucking creepy old man that enjoys
> hanging out in courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or
> something.
Eesh,
You trip on someone watching the case and think they should mind their own business, but you go to peoples homes and don't mind your own business.
Shoes on the other foot. Your not in control this time, and you cant handle it.
This case is interesting, it may show what we can and cannot get away with here. I'd go, but its too much hassle and waiting.
And the guy said he'd hook you up with an Atty pro bono. Why dog on him?
But anyhow, best of luck.
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > To Eesh....
> >
> > I hope this is my last message to you...
> >
> > Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> > resorting to name calling?
> >
> > I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb
> or
> > not; clearly, given the name you have made up
> in
> > an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you
> think
> > I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> > else knows who I am. I have a right to be in
> any
> > courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around
> to
> > do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> > community that 90 percent of the people in the
> > courtroom know me and I know them.
> >
> > Dude... The court will see this website. You
> are
> > in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> > heaven's sake.
> >
> > Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> > why you insist on treating me that way.
> >
> > Good luck... And get some legal representation!
>
>
>
> No, you are a fucking creepy old man that enjoys
> hanging out in courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or
> something.
Eesh,
You trip on someone watching the case and think they should mind their own business, but you go to peoples homes and don't mind your own business.
Shoes on the other foot. Your not in control this time, and you cant handle it.
This case is interesting, it may show what we can and cannot get away with here. I'd go, but its too much hassle and waiting.
And the guy said he'd hook you up with an Atty pro bono. Why dog on him?
But anyhow, best of luck.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:35PM
The OP is a troll, I'll explain when I get home.
Blessed are the murderous.
Blessed are the murderous.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
95 South
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:48PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The OP is a troll, I'll explain when I get home.
Fucker....you been on your way home for 6 hours now. Is it taking that long to dream up your story?
-------------------------------------------------------
> The OP is a troll, I'll explain when I get home.
Fucker....you been on your way home for 6 hours now. Is it taking that long to dream up your story?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:51PM
So angry, so desperate to see my response.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
little cry baby eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:55PM
Typical eesh behavior when things aren't going his way.
Accuse poster of being Eli or someone else, accuse poster of trolling, accuse poster of not knowing what their talking about, try to take credibility away from the poster.
Accuse poster of being Eli or someone else, accuse poster of trolling, accuse poster of not knowing what their talking about, try to take credibility away from the poster.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MDyyx
()
Date: March 13, 2015 08:56PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> claimed harassment for being in the same county as
> her.
eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for something like this to take place.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> claimed harassment for being in the same county as
> her.
eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for something like this to take place.
Re: Proceedings
Posted by:
so excited!
()
Date: March 13, 2015 09:06PM
I am seriously on pins and needles.
If I wasn't a basement troll, I might miss this.
If I wasn't a basement troll, I might miss this.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 09:25PM
MDyyx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> > claimed harassment for being in the same county
> as
> > her.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?40,file=178395,filename=image.jpg>
>
> eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever
> arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to
> be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for
> something like this to take place.
I know, but credibility is everything when talking to the police. You can bring evidence, and explain in an intelligent manner what is happening.....or you can cry wolf for a year.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fortunately Megan was not there. She would have
> > claimed harassment for being in the same county
> as
> > her.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?40,file=178395,filename=image.jpg>
>
> eesh has been accused of so much but wasn't ever
> arrested, no one finds that strange? There has to
> be concrete proof and heavy probable cause for
> something like this to take place.
I know, but credibility is everything when talking to the police. You can bring evidence, and explain in an intelligent manner what is happening.....or you can cry wolf for a year.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9/11
()
Date: March 13, 2015 09:47PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/664043.html
Re: how are you celebrating the 9/11 accident?
Posted by: Mr. Misery ()
Date: September 04, 2011 12:23AM
I really want attention in real life, but I'm always too afraid when I get it, so I retreat and isolate myself, while still wanting attention; the wanting, the retreating, the wanting, the retreating. It's a vicious cycle. What you have surmised is true. I'm honest enough to admit it.
having said that, when those people jumped out of the burning buildings, I about bust a gut. It was the funniest, most hysterical thing I have ever seen in life ever. It was the best day of my life. I love 9/11. It was a great thing to happen to this country. It was awesome. Totally radical and tubular. 9/11 rocks.
Re: how are you celebrating the 9/11 accident?
Posted by: Mr. Misery ()
Date: September 04, 2011 12:23AM
I really want attention in real life, but I'm always too afraid when I get it, so I retreat and isolate myself, while still wanting attention; the wanting, the retreating, the wanting, the retreating. It's a vicious cycle. What you have surmised is true. I'm honest enough to admit it.
having said that, when those people jumped out of the burning buildings, I about bust a gut. It was the funniest, most hysterical thing I have ever seen in life ever. It was the best day of my life. I love 9/11. It was a great thing to happen to this country. It was awesome. Totally radical and tubular. 9/11 rocks.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf25253426653(2
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:00PM
@ CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Correction:
> >
> > At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> > above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
>
> > To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And
> so
> > I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
>
>
> That was a very good write-up -- clearly written,
> and with a good selection of interesting details
> that brought the picture - the setting, the
> various characters, the drama - to life in
> my mind.
>
> Well done. Seriously.
>
> An experienced pro journalist would likely produce
> something more polished -- but, you know, maybe
> not a whole lot more polished if we were
> looking at a quickly prepared first draft as yet
> ungroomed by the tender ministrations of a style
> editor, and the writer's own revisions and
> emendations.
>
> In short: You have a good eye, a good ear, and
> good sense of the overall picture. Perhaps most
> importantly, you have a feel for the DRAMA of the
> situation. Specifically, you show a very nice
> feel for the nuances and changes that occur in a
> fluid, unfolding drama.
>
> AND you have the ability to synthesize all of
> that, and quickly translate it into fluent,
> readable, not unstylish prose. Although this was
> no great spectacle, your account made the
> "mini-drama" of this morning's events interesting
> and engaging. You brought it to life.
>
> Your ability to perceive all these things, and
> convey them to the reader, demonstrates a gift for
> non-fiction storytelling -- for narrative
> journalism.
>
> It demonstrates that you are a writer.
>
> My honest opinion, for what it's worth.
You gonna give him a handjob or something?
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Correction:
> >
> > At one point in my ridiculously long missive,
> > above, I mistakenly referred to Eesh's attorney.
>
> > To be clear, he did NOT have an attorney. And
> so
> > I meant that to be a reference to Eesh.
>
>
> That was a very good write-up -- clearly written,
> and with a good selection of interesting details
> that brought the picture - the setting, the
> various characters, the drama - to life in
> my mind.
>
> Well done. Seriously.
>
> An experienced pro journalist would likely produce
> something more polished -- but, you know, maybe
> not a whole lot more polished if we were
> looking at a quickly prepared first draft as yet
> ungroomed by the tender ministrations of a style
> editor, and the writer's own revisions and
> emendations.
>
> In short: You have a good eye, a good ear, and
> good sense of the overall picture. Perhaps most
> importantly, you have a feel for the DRAMA of the
> situation. Specifically, you show a very nice
> feel for the nuances and changes that occur in a
> fluid, unfolding drama.
>
> AND you have the ability to synthesize all of
> that, and quickly translate it into fluent,
> readable, not unstylish prose. Although this was
> no great spectacle, your account made the
> "mini-drama" of this morning's events interesting
> and engaging. You brought it to life.
>
> Your ability to perceive all these things, and
> convey them to the reader, demonstrates a gift for
> non-fiction storytelling -- for narrative
> journalism.
>
> It demonstrates that you are a writer.
>
> My honest opinion, for what it's worth.
You gonna give him a handjob or something?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourlegs
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:06PM
Eesh, I seriously doubt this guy is the lamb center troll. You're simply trying to undermine the credibility of our only source of information on your case. I also have a feeling this guy isn't the guy you were looking at either.
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:16PM
what I don't understand is how anyone can post Mr. Misery's posts matter of factly and be proud of it =d
he da man !
he da man !
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
95 South
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:23PM
Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10 hour drive from Alexandria?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
95 Right Up Your Ass
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:27PM
95 South Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10 hour
> drive from Alexandria?
Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be patient.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10 hour
> drive from Alexandria?
Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be patient.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Xjny7
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:33PM
I can predict with absolute 100% undeniable undisputable evidence that eesh has no idea who the op is
eesh will scour through hundreds of posts and hours of research to try to find something, but end up with zero
eesh will TRY to say he knows, but does not and NEVER will unless the op decides to tell him
misery>eesh
#notcriminals
#havejobs
#donotlivewithmommy
#notadulterers
eesh will scour through hundreds of posts and hours of research to try to find something, but end up with zero
eesh will TRY to say he knows, but does not and NEVER will unless the op decides to tell him
misery>eesh
#notcriminals
#havejobs
#donotlivewithmommy
#notadulterers
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:47PM
95 Right Up Your Ass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 95 South Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10
> hour
> > drive from Alexandria?
>
>
> Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to
> hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be
> patient.
Yeah, just got back home. It was nice walking around Old Town Alexandria, and Fort Belvoir has changed so much since I ETS'd there back in 2007. Even with the sequestration they are really putting a lot of money into that post.
Driving down was a mess, hopefully the express lanes will go right into Richmond one day.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 95 South Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh....did they move Richmond? It's now a 10
> hour
> > drive from Alexandria?
>
>
> Let the lad relax and enjoy his day. I'm eager to
> hear the rest of the story as well, but I'll be
> patient.
Yeah, just got back home. It was nice walking around Old Town Alexandria, and Fort Belvoir has changed so much since I ETS'd there back in 2007. Even with the sequestration they are really putting a lot of money into that post.
Driving down was a mess, hopefully the express lanes will go right into Richmond one day.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 13, 2015 10:51PM
That meme doesn't actually make any sense. I haven't seen any evidence of lizzie or eesh posting or shitting on any threads that don't involve them. That seems to be where my of their posting goes to - threads about them.
Now, if we want to face reality and bring up actual issues of people who thrive on drama and post on and shit on threads where they aren't the topic or apart of the discussion we can point out why Megan Toohey called Papa John's.
Now, if we want to face reality and bring up actual issues of people who thrive on drama and post on and shit on threads where they aren't the topic or apart of the discussion we can point out why Megan Toohey called Papa John's.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:01PM
Yo OP, Tanks for covering the proceedings. FFU IS better than TV. Everyone here contributes to the drama and entertainment. Everyone should give themselves a pat on the back and head to Kilroys on Wed Nite. Don't forget the Timmy Slaw.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Badbreath Biker
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:05PM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget the Timmy Slaw.
That's what I came here for!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Don't forget the Timmy Slaw.
That's what I came here for!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:06PM
We can just ignore that ever happened, ignore the terrible grammar and sentence structure and the retaliatory nature of the meme. Ignore that it was in response to eesh saying Megan is attracted to turmoil and strife the way a fly is attracted to cow dung that made it so darned obvious.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:12PM by Nostradamus.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:12PM by Nostradamus.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
better call saul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> this is all very troubling for me. some old guy
> going to eesh's trial, the simple fact that eesh
> had to go to trial for "bullying" a grown man on a
> niche website on the internet, lizzie being
> dressed up nicely, lizzie still not being my gf,
> none of this is comfortable for me.
>
> I am a maelstrom of discontent and I've gotta tell
> you, I've had just about enough of this bullshit
Yeah....that's the thing. This suit opened a Pandora's Box for the plaintiffs. As I said before, all this supposed turmoil was limited to a single site on the internet, but now, everything will be in public documents; a certain plaintiff will have to take the stand in front of a jury and a courtroom full of people...
...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in front of the Henrico judge for my permanent protective order hearing is a definite predictor of future behavior. I just don't know how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going before a court and explaining in detail what has supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
-------------------------------------------------------
> this is all very troubling for me. some old guy
> going to eesh's trial, the simple fact that eesh
> had to go to trial for "bullying" a grown man on a
> niche website on the internet, lizzie being
> dressed up nicely, lizzie still not being my gf,
> none of this is comfortable for me.
>
> I am a maelstrom of discontent and I've gotta tell
> you, I've had just about enough of this bullshit
Yeah....that's the thing. This suit opened a Pandora's Box for the plaintiffs. As I said before, all this supposed turmoil was limited to a single site on the internet, but now, everything will be in public documents; a certain plaintiff will have to take the stand in front of a jury and a courtroom full of people...
...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in front of the Henrico judge for my permanent protective order hearing is a definite predictor of future behavior. I just don't know how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going before a court and explaining in detail what has supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
busy night for eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:11PM
Get busy gathering all the info you can on the OP so you can prove to people on the interwebz that he is not credible and everything with you is fine and dandy.
Cuz ya know you just didn't have to spend your whole day and money dealing with this non-problem.
Cuz ya know you just didn't have to spend your whole day and money dealing with this non-problem.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:15PM
popcorn in microwave Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> " Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service."
>
>
> LOL!
>
> Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough to
> post the documents on FFXU after he was served?
Actually, I had a reason for posting those documents, and it worked out well in the end.
-------------------------------------------------------
> " Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service."
>
>
> LOL!
>
> Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough to
> post the documents on FFXU after he was served?
Actually, I had a reason for posting those documents, and it worked out well in the end.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xMXKE
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:39PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.
no, it did not
but you can pretend all you like, we find you lies and disinformation just charming
the best part of all of this is you will try to intimidate misery here on ffu, but it will not work and your sad reality will be when misery posts AFTER you lose the case
the op already has proven that you have no idea what you are doing in a courtroom and no one will believe any of your bullshit
the false hope is you think that somehow you will be able to introduce miserys threads into the courtroom and interview him like on some TV show, never going to happen, but please base your whole case on that idea
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.
no, it did not
but you can pretend all you like, we find you lies and disinformation just charming
the best part of all of this is you will try to intimidate misery here on ffu, but it will not work and your sad reality will be when misery posts AFTER you lose the case
the op already has proven that you have no idea what you are doing in a courtroom and no one will believe any of your bullshit
the false hope is you think that somehow you will be able to introduce miserys threads into the courtroom and interview him like on some TV show, never going to happen, but please base your whole case on that idea
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
you dont know eesh...
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:47PM
Eesh has been watching how to be a lawyer videos on youtube, and reading wikihow.
Eesh don't need no lawyer.
but seriously...
We will know when eesh really lawyers up, per the advice of his lawyer he will stop posting the day that happens.
Eesh don't need no lawyer.
but seriously...
We will know when eesh really lawyers up, per the advice of his lawyer he will stop posting the day that happens.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:54PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got finished. You weren't there because you "had a break."
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it makes you feel better.
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly continuances before we got to be heard. If your idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys asking for continuances, more power to you.
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
I get it, you were there and you really want us to know you saw us.
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the attorney. It was just a motions day.
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
Again, you proved your point. You were there, congratulations.
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
This was already known on the site.
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary judgement is entirely different.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response.
You should have listened more instead of noting how I was dressed.
As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again, default judgement, not summary judgement.
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have listened more.
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.
No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out what is needed when the service is posted to a door of an abode.
Again, you should have been listening.
He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At this point you are making things up.
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
You don't defend yourself on motions day, you explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the judge accepted my explanation.
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement.
No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge noted the service was incomplete, as the steps laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been followed. She also noted that I did respond, and she even said that default judgement cannot occur when service is posted to a door of an abode.
She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se.
More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion for default judgement, or summary judgement as you are determined to call it.
She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
> The judge was having none of it.
Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer called me a gambler for acting pro se.
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
...but you just said "she was having none of that."
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service.
She denied the motion for default judgement, the motion to quash service will be heard again.
However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she denied the motion to quash process, now you say she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have both.
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going to be good.
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
Sounds like you have experience with crying to the ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights were trampled upon at one point.
This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground
Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit, pure and simple.
> Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by the attorneys that I have consulted.
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
I know you want me off the site, and I know that it pains you that I have never been banned, but try harder with the pseudo-advice.
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court.
She has no part in this suit, she was there to take care of something.
If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings.
You mean......she could be impeached as a witness? Is that what you are attempting to say?
And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow that escapes you.
So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were more interested in taking note of what I was wearing than actually listening to the motion. You also want me off the site and want me to stop associating with lizzie. Basically, you are threatened by our presence on the site, but not threatened enough to sit by us in person.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got finished. You weren't there because you "had a break."
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it makes you feel better.
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly continuances before we got to be heard. If your idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys asking for continuances, more power to you.
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
I get it, you were there and you really want us to know you saw us.
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the attorney. It was just a motions day.
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
Again, you proved your point. You were there, congratulations.
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
This was already known on the site.
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary judgement is entirely different.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response.
You should have listened more instead of noting how I was dressed.
As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again, default judgement, not summary judgement.
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have listened more.
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.
No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out what is needed when the service is posted to a door of an abode.
Again, you should have been listening.
He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At this point you are making things up.
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
You don't defend yourself on motions day, you explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the judge accepted my explanation.
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement.
No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge noted the service was incomplete, as the steps laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been followed. She also noted that I did respond, and she even said that default judgement cannot occur when service is posted to a door of an abode.
She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se.
More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion for default judgement, or summary judgement as you are determined to call it.
She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
> The judge was having none of it.
Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer called me a gambler for acting pro se.
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
...but you just said "she was having none of that."
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service.
She denied the motion for default judgement, the motion to quash service will be heard again.
However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she denied the motion to quash process, now you say she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have both.
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going to be good.
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
Sounds like you have experience with crying to the ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights were trampled upon at one point.
This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground
Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit, pure and simple.
> Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by the attorneys that I have consulted.
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
I know you want me off the site, and I know that it pains you that I have never been banned, but try harder with the pseudo-advice.
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court.
She has no part in this suit, she was there to take care of something.
If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings.
You mean......she could be impeached as a witness? Is that what you are attempting to say?
And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow that escapes you.
So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were more interested in taking note of what I was wearing than actually listening to the motion. You also want me off the site and want me to stop associating with lizzie. Basically, you are threatened by our presence on the site, but not threatened enough to sit by us in person.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:54PM
Double post!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:55PM by eesh.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/13/2015 11:55PM by eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
no one believes u eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:00AM
Thanks again OP for the precise, and accurate information!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh paranoia
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:05AM
Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone through the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu. Without ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me go bonkers.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
VwEjd
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:06AM
"He intentionally timed this perfectly as my grandfather is on his deathbed in another state"
How could eesh have known this?
How could eesh have known this?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Kp7jj
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:08AM
not only does no one believe him, he has no proof
also he has no idea who the op was, so that is eating away at him
also he has no idea who the op was, so that is eating away at him
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
best post yet
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:09AM
> Were you giving some thought to jumping into the
> Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the
> WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic
> for 50 miles.
> Potomac and ending all this? I would suggest the
> WW Bridge. You'll get TV coverage and stop traffic
> for 50 miles.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
LLOL so true!
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:10AM
eesh paranoia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone through
> the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu. Without
> ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me go
> bonkers.
+1
Are we just the same posters though!??
According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my own post now!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone through
> the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu. Without
> ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me go
> bonkers.
+1
Are we just the same posters though!??
According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my own post now!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Kp9UW
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:16AM
LLOL so true! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh paranoia Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone
> through
> > the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> > get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu.
> Without
> > ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> > yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me
> go
> > bonkers.
>
>
> +1
>
>
> Are we just the same posters though!??
>
> According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my
> own post now!
yes, we are the same poster according to eesh or any other hated ffu poster
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh paranoia Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hello, I'm eesh's paranoia and I've gone
> through
> > the roof. I'm being sued and everyone is out to
> > get me. I will never stop posting on ffxu.
> Without
> > ffxu I am nothing. Meanwhile, don't entertain
> > yourselves too much with my misery. It makes me
> go
> > bonkers.
>
>
> +1
>
>
> Are we just the same posters though!??
>
> According to eesh I'm sure I'm just replying to my
> own post now!
yes, we are the same poster according to eesh or any other hated ffu poster
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
the bright side
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:22AM
Look at the bright side. At least eesh finally belongs in Fairfax like the rest of us. Even if it is in the court system.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:37AM
Eh, I like Alexandria a lot better. Now if they could just do something about those annoying buskers that take up sidewalk space. They can't sing, can't play their instrument of choice, just GTFO the narrow sidewalk.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KwFUG
()
Date: March 14, 2015 01:21AM
fourlegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh, I seriously doubt this guy is the lamb
> center troll. You're simply trying to undermine
> the credibility of our only source of information
> on your case.
BINGO!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh, I seriously doubt this guy is the lamb
> center troll. You're simply trying to undermine
> the credibility of our only source of information
> on your case.
BINGO!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
yj6hx
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:18AM
eesh, the "playing it off" does not work on a message board
go post some more mundane shit in other threads to pretend you do not care
go post some more mundane shit in other threads to pretend you do not care
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Playing it off
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:47AM
OP is the guy he is saying he mistook for Misery
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Please Recycle
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:36AM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground...
Nah. With all respect, there's nothing in this case that has any First Amendment interest or significance.
To the extent the suit alleges publication of tortious language, the claims are aimed at language that is either clearly outside the scope of First Amendment protection, or falls within a category where the relevant legal principles are well-defined, and the only issue is the proper application of those principles.
That said, the lawsuit may present eesh with the possibility for breaking new ground on the tactical front, by introducing Fairfax Underground-style arguments into the courtroom.
Thus, when Mr. Leiser rattles off a litany of seemingly damning facts, eesh need merely reach for an appropriate 4'x3' placard, and display it for the jury with a knowing smile.
Perhaps this for starters:
And when he really needs to lower the boom, there's always this:
As for stalking, the buck stops here.
For his closing argument, eesh can simply direct the
attention of the jury to the unseemly length of Mr.
Leiser's hair, roll his eyes, and say, "You are a
fucking creepy old man that enjoys hanging out in
courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or something. Your
argument is retarded. We both know you're just
making shit up. WTF is wrong with you? I rest my
case."
@ CourthouseObserver, IMPORTANT: DO *NOT* open any "private message" (or "pm") you may receive via your FU account from *anybody*, but especially not anything sent by eesh.
Eesh has openly boasted of using a phishing technique (a web bug triggered by opening a pm) to "out" the identity of registered user Gerrymanderer2.
-------------------------------------------------------
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground...
Nah. With all respect, there's nothing in this case that has any First Amendment interest or significance.
To the extent the suit alleges publication of tortious language, the claims are aimed at language that is either clearly outside the scope of First Amendment protection, or falls within a category where the relevant legal principles are well-defined, and the only issue is the proper application of those principles.
That said, the lawsuit may present eesh with the possibility for breaking new ground on the tactical front, by introducing Fairfax Underground-style arguments into the courtroom.
Thus, when Mr. Leiser rattles off a litany of seemingly damning facts, eesh need merely reach for an appropriate 4'x3' placard, and display it for the jury with a knowing smile.
Perhaps this for starters:
And when he really needs to lower the boom, there's always this:
As for stalking, the buck stops here.
For his closing argument, eesh can simply direct the
attention of the jury to the unseemly length of Mr.
Leiser's hair, roll his eyes, and say, "You are a
fucking creepy old man that enjoys hanging out in
courtrooms. Watch a soap opera or something. Your
argument is retarded. We both know you're just
making shit up. WTF is wrong with you? I rest my
case."
@ CourthouseObserver, IMPORTANT: DO *NOT* open any "private message" (or "pm") you may receive via your FU account from *anybody*, but especially not anything sent by eesh.
Eesh has openly boasted of using a phishing technique (a web bug triggered by opening a pm) to "out" the identity of registered user Gerrymanderer2.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
That Dude
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:58AM
I want to LMAO, but wow...these stupid mother fuckers and their self inflated sense of self importance, WOW.
I can't imagine how empty ones life must be, when life resorts to this kind of junior high bull shit. This dude is a fucking joke, a small pricked, over inked, curly headed fucktard. The company he keeps also speaks volumes, you know, birds of a feather and all that. . .I am almost curious as to what went so badly wrong in their lives where this is what makes them feel good.
It's like on homogeneous ball of fucktards:Eesh/mo-Lizzie/Megan/Caan/Mis/Stab/the other"100"posters". . .
Grow up, you fucking bumbs!
There is a wonderful world out there, that isn't on a computer. Go try it!
I can't imagine how empty ones life must be, when life resorts to this kind of junior high bull shit. This dude is a fucking joke, a small pricked, over inked, curly headed fucktard. The company he keeps also speaks volumes, you know, birds of a feather and all that. . .I am almost curious as to what went so badly wrong in their lives where this is what makes them feel good.
It's like on homogeneous ball of fucktards:Eesh/mo-Lizzie/Megan/Caan/Mis/Stab/the other"100"posters". . .
Grow up, you fucking bumbs!
There is a wonderful world out there, that isn't on a computer. Go try it!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh, you creepy douche
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:11AM
your fucking lucky I didn't know you were in town .....btw, I wonder if daddy knows of the trouble he has got himself into this time...I would bet not
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
343WP
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:45AM
Here is the most important FACT that exists in this case:
Eesh believes that ffu is more reality than the real world.
I am looking forward, maybe it will take a year or two, when Miz gets to come back here and post for months detailing the entire case. Eesh will likely escape any jail time, but will owe lets say around $100,000 to the miz family. He will be paying this a little at a time from any employment in the future.
What great revenge having eesh reminded every paycheck that he failed in life and the cause were his actions here on ffu,
Eesh believes that ffu is more reality than the real world.
I am looking forward, maybe it will take a year or two, when Miz gets to come back here and post for months detailing the entire case. Eesh will likely escape any jail time, but will owe lets say around $100,000 to the miz family. He will be paying this a little at a time from any employment in the future.
What great revenge having eesh reminded every paycheck that he failed in life and the cause were his actions here on ffu,
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Maury sez...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:05AM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay brotha. That's fine and all seeing as how
> eesh isn't stupid and hasn't told me anything at
> all..
>
>
> ...oooooo
>
>
> .
>
> ..
That was a lie.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay brotha. That's fine and all seeing as how
> eesh isn't stupid and hasn't told me anything at
> all..
>
>
> ...oooooo
>
>
> .
>
> ..
That was a lie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Maury sez...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:07AM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To Eesh....
>
> I hope this is my last message to you...
>
> Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> resorting to name calling?
>
> I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or
> not; clearly, given the name you have made up in
> an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think
> I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any
> courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to
> do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> community that 90 percent of the people in the
> courtroom know me and I know them.
>
> Dude... The court will see this website. You are
> in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> heaven's sake.
>
> Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> why you insist on treating me that way.
>
> Good luck... And get some legal representation!
You stole his thunder and his chance to write history the way he wants it repeated. Not the way it actually occurred. He still thinks he's in control.
-------------------------------------------------------
> To Eesh....
>
> I hope this is my last message to you...
>
> Why are you so angry at me? And why are you
> resorting to name calling?
>
> I don't know if I stuck out like a sore thumb or
> not; clearly, given the name you have made up in
> an attempt to denigrate me, I am not who you think
> I was. But I could care less if you or anyone
> else knows who I am. I have a right to be in any
> courtroom I want. I don't have to sneak around to
> do it. And I am well-known enough in the legal
> community that 90 percent of the people in the
> courtroom know me and I know them.
>
> Dude... The court will see this website. You are
> in trouble. When in a hole, stop digging, for
> heaven's sake.
>
> Again, I am not your enemy. I don't understand
> why you insist on treating me that way.
>
> Good luck... And get some legal representation!
You stole his thunder and his chance to write history the way he wants it repeated. Not the way it actually occurred. He still thinks he's in control.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Maury sez...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:13AM
get out Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get out of our beloved county you degenerate.
He can't. That's why he's in this mess to start with. Just couldn't leave it on the internet. He had to travel many miles to dick with someone that no one gives a damn about. It's a disease.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Get out of our beloved county you degenerate.
He can't. That's why he's in this mess to start with. Just couldn't leave it on the internet. He had to travel many miles to dick with someone that no one gives a damn about. It's a disease.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:24AM
When is Mo-Mo's hearing? We need a good reporter to ask Katie whether she got any new tats or piercings since Mo-Mo was kicked out of her bed. If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be able to get a camera phone in and take some pics of what Katie wears to court.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
6m9dd
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:27AM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When is Mo-Mo's hearing? We need a good reporter
> to ask Katie whether she got any new tats or
> piercings since Mo-Mo was kicked out of her bed.
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.
That would be considered harrassment
-------------------------------------------------------
> When is Mo-Mo's hearing? We need a good reporter
> to ask Katie whether she got any new tats or
> piercings since Mo-Mo was kicked out of her bed.
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.
That would be considered harrassment
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:39AM
Okay..No Pics. But OP could report on what Katie was wearing and whether she even shows up.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
4yd9L
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:41AM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay..No Pics. But OP could report on what Katie
> was wearing and whether she even shows up.
Still harrassment. Leave that girl alone.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay..No Pics. But OP could report on what Katie
> was wearing and whether she even shows up.
Still harrassment. Leave that girl alone.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf65333433
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:58AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.
I will point out that you have a lawyer counseling you to not post here. The same person stated you were admonished by a judge for trying to represent yourself. Yet you persist on posting. You aren't impressing anyone.
-------------------------------------------------------
> popcorn in microwave Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > " Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash service."
> >
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > Did the lawyer point out eesh was dumb enough
> to
> > post the documents on FFXU after he was
> served?
>
>
>
> Actually, I had a reason for posting those
> documents, and it worked out well in the end.
I will point out that you have a lawyer counseling you to not post here. The same person stated you were admonished by a judge for trying to represent yourself. Yet you persist on posting. You aren't impressing anyone.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf24262:15142
()
Date: March 14, 2015 08:16AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.
You're a one trick horse, eesh. The entire cadre of readers saw your response coming before you finished. Contradict the message, insult the messenger, reassert your confidence and omniscience. I am sure you are working to find the identity of the person to further underscore what you will portend is malicious intent.
But none of us are stupid enough to believe your version of the events. And while you may emerge from this trial innocent, you won't emerge unscathed. But keep telling yourself otherwise. It's what +we+ think of you that matters more than what you write about yourself.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.
You're a one trick horse, eesh. The entire cadre of readers saw your response coming before you finished. Contradict the message, insult the messenger, reassert your confidence and omniscience. I am sure you are working to find the identity of the person to further underscore what you will portend is malicious intent.
But none of us are stupid enough to believe your version of the events. And while you may emerge from this trial innocent, you won't emerge unscathed. But keep telling yourself otherwise. It's what +we+ think of you that matters more than what you write about yourself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Op is ballsy and awesome
()
Date: March 14, 2015 08:23AM
Op is fucking awesome, eesh! I think he was one of the Ediots trolling megan. How can you hate on him for wanting to see what happened and let us know? I would have gone if I had time off. It would have been really hard to keep from staring, and misery not appearing would have been a big disappointment, but helped a bit by the Lizzie cameo
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
i know who it was
()
Date: March 14, 2015 08:35AM
so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early bird special
who does that sound like?
who does that sound like?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
one trick pony
()
Date: March 14, 2015 09:56AM
You're right. Eesh is a one trick pony. His manner and response seems so bland and predictable. He's the perfect uniform troll but a loser at everything else.
Seeing him try to deal with reality scared shitless yet trying exude confidence is entertaining to watch though.
Seeing him try to deal with reality scared shitless yet trying exude confidence is entertaining to watch though.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Katie Stalker
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:06AM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.
I can get you pictures of Katie anytime you want them.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> If OP is a regular at the court house, he might be
> able to get a camera phone in and take some pics
> of what Katie wears to court.
I can get you pictures of Katie anytime you want them.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:10AM
Sorry ..Only want to know whatshe wears to court. It might be an orange jump suit, if half of what Mo-Mo posted is true.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:15AM
You gotta admit that eesh and Mo-Mo were looking good yesterday. They were dressed up respectfully. Smart real Smart.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Speech
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:24AM
i know who it was Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special
>
> who does that sound like?
Gerry Connolly?
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special
>
> who does that sound like?
Gerry Connolly?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:26AM
i know who it was Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special
LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and he'll be a General District judge; by the end of the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the International Court of Justice.
* A lawyer that doesn't know the difference between summary and default judgement.
-------------------------------------------------------
> so the op is an old guy with long hair, think's he
> is a lawyer and wakes up at six am for the early
> bird special
LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and he'll be a General District judge; by the end of the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the International Court of Justice.
* A lawyer that doesn't know the difference between summary and default judgement.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lol hes butthurt
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:29AM
Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:32AM
lol hes butthurt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?
I think the only persons butthurt are the ones angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave you to your frothing at the mouth.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?
I think the only persons butthurt are the ones angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave you to your frothing at the mouth.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh's legal defense
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:36AM
Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you understand what the judge said to you.
You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the fuck out.
You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the fuck out.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stubborn eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:39AM
What's more important to eesh is trying to find out who OP is and take away his credibility.
That lawyer stuff will maybe come later, his FFXU rep is more important.
That lawyer stuff will maybe come later, his FFXU rep is more important.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:40AM
eesh's legal defense Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> understand what the judge said to you.
>
> You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot
> for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play
> ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
>
> Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> fuck out.
That's not what was said...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> understand what the judge said to you.
>
> You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an idiot
> for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to play
> ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
>
> Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> fuck out.
That's not what was said...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
oh eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:44AM
Oh Eesh, if you weren't such a paranoid evil short dickhead one might actually feel sympathy for you.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Orange is not the new black
()
Date: March 14, 2015 12:51PM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry ..Only want to know whatshe wears to court.
> It might be an orange jump suit, if half of what
> Mo-Mo posted is true.
I don't think Fairfax uses orange
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry ..Only want to know whatshe wears to court.
> It might be an orange jump suit, if half of what
> Mo-Mo posted is true.
I don't think Fairfax uses orange
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf46283638273
()
Date: March 14, 2015 01:32PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i know who it was Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a
> lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and
> he'll be a General District judge; by the end of
> the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the
> International Court of Justice.
>
And you'll still be in court on an Internet stalking charge. Backstopped by a reputation of being a dolt and troll.
It pays to be a winner.
-------------------------------------------------------
> i know who it was Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> LOL He went from being a courtroom reporter to a
> lawyer* within a few posts. A few more posts, and
> he'll be a General District judge; by the end of
> the thread, he'll be a presiding judge at the
> International Court of Justice.
>
And you'll still be in court on an Internet stalking charge. Backstopped by a reputation of being a dolt and troll.
It pays to be a winner.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf95728-047203728
()
Date: March 14, 2015 01:33PM
lol hes butthurt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?
Rectum is swollen.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just me?
Rectum is swollen.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf212385938182884748
()
Date: March 14, 2015 01:35PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol hes butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> you to your frothing at the mouth.
I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient to do so.
You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol hes butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> you to your frothing at the mouth.
I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient to do so.
You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf46816461946383
()
Date: March 14, 2015 01:37PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > understand what the judge said to you.
> >
> > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> idiot
> > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> play
> > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> >
> > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> > fuck out.
>
> That's not what was said...
Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a transcript in a few weeks or so.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > understand what the judge said to you.
> >
> > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> idiot
> > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> play
> > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> >
> > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get the
> > fuck out.
>
> That's not what was said...
Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a transcript in a few weeks or so.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The Fairfax (U'd) Assessment Bd
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:33PM
Durf212385938182884748 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > eesh Wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> > angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> > suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> > you to your frothing at the mouth.
>
> I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing
> charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico
> County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent
> yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient
> to do so.
>
> You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.
Reaffirmed, again, for anyone who doubted that:
The power of clear statement is
Durf212385938182884748 wins.
And eesh, well, he may be fronting [insert picture of happy person]
but inside he be like all
* I refer, of course, to the remark of Daniel Webster, whose life and practice eesh might now, after long delay, profitably study.
Pic unrelated.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > eesh Wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> > angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> > suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> > you to your frothing at the mouth.
>
> I'm sure you are just thrilled to be facing
> charges in Fairfax Court and driving from Henrico
> County each time. Meanwhile trying to represent
> yourself when you lack the intelligence quotient
> to do so.
>
> You aren't fooling anyone. Have a great day.
Reaffirmed, again, for anyone who doubted that:
The power of clear statement is
the great power at the bar.*
Durf212385938182884748 wins.
And eesh, well, he may be fronting [insert picture of happy person]
but inside he be like all
* I refer, of course, to the remark of Daniel Webster, whose life and practice eesh might now, after long delay, profitably study.
Pic unrelated.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:46PM
I think a certain troll needs to look up the difference between criminal and civil trials....and when they get their ADHD under control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic. Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about cyberbullying or internet stalking.
Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned poster that is currently facing computer harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we won't talk about that out of decency.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/14/2015 02:47PM by eesh.
Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned poster that is currently facing computer harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we won't talk about that out of decency.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/14/2015 02:47PM by eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
pretty sure
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:52PM
Pretty sure he's not preoccupied with that bogus computer harrassment charge. He mays sue the shirt off your back though.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
FU Sr. Psychiatrist
()
Date: March 14, 2015 02:52PM
The Fairfax (U'd) Assessment Bd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...but inside he be like all
No, idiot.
Inside he "be like":
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...but inside he be like all
No, idiot.
Inside he "be like":
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
court reporter
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:08PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A simple observation
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:20PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
Cyberbullying and internet (and real-life) stalking are mentioned numerous times.
You miss that somehow?
Eyes wide shut is only a movie. It's no way to go through life, son.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
Cyberbullying and internet (and real-life) stalking are mentioned numerous times.
You miss that somehow?
Eyes wide shut is only a movie. It's no way to go through life, son.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
What I don't undestand
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:26PM
Why was eesh never arrested for all this? Doesn't an arrest come before a lawsuit?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dane Bramage
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:29PM
Mind blown Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if TheNorthman was really court room
> reporter?
It's Gravis.
-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if TheNorthman was really court room
> reporter?
It's Gravis.
-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf633636173(4728
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:34PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think a certain troll needs to look up the
> difference between criminal and civil
> trials....and when they get their ADHD under
> control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic.
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
>
>
> Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned
> poster that is currently facing computer
> harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we
> won't talk about that out of decency.
Misery charges are not relevant to the present state of your affairs. Let alone what we think of you. You are driving 2-3 hours to attend court, all of which is on the public record. Let's see how many FFXU people you can convince that you are really happy with this arrangement.
Speaking of, I'm teleworking from San Diego next week, what exactly is it you do other than stalk people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional community college student?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think a certain troll needs to look up the
> difference between criminal and civil
> trials....and when they get their ADHD under
> control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic.
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
>
>
> Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned
> poster that is currently facing computer
> harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we
> won't talk about that out of decency.
Misery charges are not relevant to the present state of your affairs. Let alone what we think of you. You are driving 2-3 hours to attend court, all of which is on the public record. Let's see how many FFXU people you can convince that you are really happy with this arrangement.
Speaking of, I'm teleworking from San Diego next week, what exactly is it you do other than stalk people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional community college student?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf6372746383649737
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:35PM
What I don't undestand Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why was eesh never arrested for all this? Doesn't
> an arrest come before a lawsuit?
Civil suit.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why was eesh never arrested for all this? Doesn't
> an arrest come before a lawsuit?
Civil suit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: March 14, 2015 03:52PM
If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I do, it'll be hard to find a seat at the next proceeding.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:14PM
uberX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I do,
> it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> proceeding.
Please do, I encourage all to come and check it out.
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I do,
> it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> proceeding.
Please do, I encourage all to come and check it out.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf9014239048123094812403
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:19PM
uberX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I do,
> it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> proceeding.
Yeah, not so much. Even the degenerates here have jobs. Which means finding 2-3 hours to visit a Fairfax court isn't likely. But more importantly nobody gives enough of a fuck about eesh to attend his hearing. Hell, Misery didn't even bother going to the most recent one...
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I do,
> it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> proceeding.
Yeah, not so much. Even the degenerates here have jobs. Which means finding 2-3 hours to visit a Fairfax court isn't likely. But more importantly nobody gives enough of a fuck about eesh to attend his hearing. Hell, Misery didn't even bother going to the most recent one...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
will be working too
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:24PM
We can probably higher a stenographer or anyone to who can write fast to report everything for us. $50 - $100 would be fair. I'm sure someone on Craigslist would do it.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Are you high now?
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:25PM
Higher?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The mystery OP is...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:28PM
Meade.
Paybacks are a bitch.
Paybacks are a bitch.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:32PM
Durf9014239048123094812403 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, not so much. Even the degenerates here have
> jobs.
Yeah, I remember Taco Bell & McD's back in the day never offered any sick or vacation time-off during the first year.
will be working too Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We can probably higher a stenographer or anyone to
> who can write fast to report everything for us.
> $50 - $100 would be fair. I'm sure someone on
> Craigslist would do it.
Now that's thinking with your head.
The mystery OP is... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade.
>
> Paybacks are a bitch.
But everyone knows exactly what Meade looks like.
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, not so much. Even the degenerates here have
> jobs.
Yeah, I remember Taco Bell & McD's back in the day never offered any sick or vacation time-off during the first year.
will be working too Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We can probably higher a stenographer or anyone to
> who can write fast to report everything for us.
> $50 - $100 would be fair. I'm sure someone on
> Craigslist would do it.
Now that's thinking with your head.
The mystery OP is... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade.
>
> Paybacks are a bitch.
But everyone knows exactly what Meade looks like.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 14, 2015 04:37PM
What if the OP was the lawyer himself?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
don't think so
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:04PM
Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if the OP was the lawyer himself?
OP described everyone in court except for the person eesh described
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if the OP was the lawyer himself?
OP described everyone in court except for the person eesh described
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh Misspelling Monitor
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:25PM
will be working too Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We can probably higher a stenographer or anyone to
^Classic "eesh" misspelling
-------------------------------------------------------
> We can probably higher a stenographer or anyone to
^Classic "eesh" misspelling
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Poker Player
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:26PM
Idiot!
Never tell eesh his "tells" !
Never tell eesh his "tells" !
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
^Full-Time Eesh Observer
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:27PM
Fake eesh criticism of eesh critic (also possibly fake)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Aspiring 'Crapflooder'
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:28PM
This guy really does have ADD!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Grammar Cat Sans Swastika
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:28PM
The Bill of Particulars specificed ADHD.
You fail.
I sentence you to death by purring.
You fail.
I sentence you to death by purring.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Manic Eesh in Tu Quoque Mode
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:29PM
Ya see that?!
Ya see that?!
A threat!
Somebody call the cops!!!!!!!1
Ya see that?!
A threat!
Somebody call the cops!!!!!!!1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The Iconic '1'
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:29PM
A sighting!
Havent' seen too many of those lately.
sniff.
Havent' seen too many of those lately.
sniff.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ghost of the Clairvoyant Topic
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:31PM
We had a great thread going here, damnit, and you spoiled it!
You spoil everything!
I hate you!
You spoil everything!
I hate you!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The mystery OP is...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:32PM
uberX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The mystery OP is... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Meade.
> >
> > Paybacks are a bitch.
>
> But everyone knows exactly what Meade looks like.
Obviously he doesn't show up himself. He relies on surrogates.
There is 'core Meade' and then his network of affiliates.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The mystery OP is... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Meade.
> >
> > Paybacks are a bitch.
>
> But everyone knows exactly what Meade looks like.
Obviously he doesn't show up himself. He relies on surrogates.
There is 'core Meade' and then his network of affiliates.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh clicks "Report Abuse"
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:32PM
The trap door opens.
Yikes.
Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Yikes.
Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
50 Other Users "Report Abuse"
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:38PM
Crickets.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Thanks, Cary!
()
Date: March 14, 2015 05:50PM
For helping a psychopath destroy multiple victims,
gathering new strength with each act of cruelty
Until he has now become
quite possibly
the most interesting monster
in the history of the internet!
He couldn't have done it without you, Cary!
You are my unconditional, number-one, all-time HERO!
I mean, has anyone else in the history of America
managed to wield the First Amendment for such evil purposes?
You "da man" Cary!
And don't weaken now that you're in the home stretch!
You *know* you're dying to see the Blood Spill. (Oops. Pun... intended.)
And it looks like you're going to get your wish.
And it's just possible that 50 years from now eesh will be long forgotten,
but *you* will be remembered as the man who "broke" section 230.
Dude, what can I say?
You are the GOAT!
IYKWIMAITYD
gathering new strength with each act of cruelty
Until he has now become
quite possibly
the most interesting monster
in the history of the internet!
He couldn't have done it without you, Cary!
You are my unconditional, number-one, all-time HERO!
I mean, has anyone else in the history of America
managed to wield the First Amendment for such evil purposes?
You "da man" Cary!
And don't weaken now that you're in the home stretch!
You *know* you're dying to see the Blood Spill. (Oops. Pun... intended.)
And it looks like you're going to get your wish.
And it's just possible that 50 years from now eesh will be long forgotten,
but *you* will be remembered as the man who "broke" section 230.
Dude, what can I say?
You are the GOAT!
IYKWIMAITYD
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:03PM
Whoa... Not a lot of love for eesh. Yo CLOWNS. I don't usually take side but the Misery Dude posting that he wants to have sex with infants....Very FUCKED UP. Who's to say someone wasn't acting like the "vigilance committees" of the Ole West? Misery's post could have inflamed many FRFXU folks.. Just saying!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
typical eesh response...
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:05PM
This whole thread has been the same 1 person responding to himself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:05PM
Yo DURF....Suck a HotChee.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Torches and Pitchforks
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:10PM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who's to say someone
> wasn't acting like the "vigilance committees" of
> the Ole West? Misery's post could have inflamed
> many FRFXU folks.. Just saying!
"Just saying," indeed.
So come on eesh be nimble, eesh be quick
Furfur sat on a candlestick
'Cause fire is the devil's only friend
Oh and as I watched him on the page
My hands were clenched in fists of rage.
No angel born in Hell
Could break that Satan's spell.
And as the flames climbed high into the night
To light the sacrificial rite
I saw Cary laughing with delight
The daaaaaaay section 230
broke.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who's to say someone
> wasn't acting like the "vigilance committees" of
> the Ole West? Misery's post could have inflamed
> many FRFXU folks.. Just saying!
"Just saying," indeed.
So come on eesh be nimble, eesh be quick
Furfur sat on a candlestick
'Cause fire is the devil's only friend
Oh and as I watched him on the page
My hands were clenched in fists of rage.
No angel born in Hell
Could break that Satan's spell.
And as the flames climbed high into the night
To light the sacrificial rite
I saw Cary laughing with delight
The daaaaaaay section 230
broke.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Oh, and another thing
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:16PM
Cy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who's to say someone
> wasn't acting like the "vigilance committees" of
> the Ole West? Misery's post could have inflamed
> many FRFXU folks.. Just saying!
^This is the sound of a guilty man.
"Who's to say"
Idiot.
Your bleating on this front has become no more convincing, although it has become tiresomely familiar these past several weeks.
Just sayin'
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who's to say someone
> wasn't acting like the "vigilance committees" of
> the Ole West? Misery's post could have inflamed
> many FRFXU folks.. Just saying!
^This is the sound of a guilty man.
"Who's to say"
Idiot.
Your bleating on this front has become no more convincing, although it has become tiresomely familiar these past several weeks.
Just sayin'
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf10129132-4091234-091234
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:23PM
Eesh Misspelling Monitor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> will be working too Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We can probably higher a stenographer or
> anyone to
>
> &n
> bsp; &nbs
> p;
> &n
> bsp; ^Classic "eesh" misspelling
eesh typically spells well, on the whole.
-------------------------------------------------------
> will be working too Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We can probably higher a stenographer or
> anyone to
>
> &n
> bsp; &nbs
> p;
> &n
> bsp; ^Classic "eesh" misspelling
eesh typically spells well, on the whole.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Durf102340123491-341234
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:24PM
typical eesh response... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This whole thread has been the same 1 person
> responding to himself.
It takes a certain level of boredom to stoop to that level.
-------------------------------------------------------
> This whole thread has been the same 1 person
> responding to himself.
It takes a certain level of boredom to stoop to that level.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Apology Boob
()
Date: March 14, 2015 06:50PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol hes butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just
> me?
>
>
>
>
> I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> you to your frothing at the mouth.
God damn I rushed home so i could get online to read eesh's follow and his ID of the OP.
What happened? Who is the OP eesh? You promised!
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol hes butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Is Eesh coming off as butt hurt or is it just
> me?
>
>
>
>
> I think the only persons butthurt are the ones
> angry that I'm not stressing out about a frivolous
> suit, or taking an e-lawyer seriously. I'll leave
> you to your frothing at the mouth.
God damn I rushed home so i could get online to read eesh's follow and his ID of the OP.
What happened? Who is the OP eesh? You promised!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
An Impertinent Colloquy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:13PM
Setting: A little boy's room, dimly lit by a spill of light from the hallway.
Mommy is tucking her boy into bed for the night.
BOY: Mommy?
MOTHER: Yes, honey?
BOY: Someone's being mean to Cary again!
MOTHER: Oh, no! That's awful! Cary is going to spank that mean boy!
And he's going to delete allll his posts very, very quietly... And secretly!
So that no one will ever know!
BOY: But didn't Cary says he never deletes nothin'?
MOTHER: Actually, honey, what he said is that he'll never delete a
"legitimate" post. Of course, that promise was never meant to include
"garbage"!
BOY: What's "garbage," Mommy?
MOTHER: Whatever Cary says it is, ya little brat. Now take this pill
and go to sleep.
She stalks out of the room, slamming the door behind her.
The camera slowly zooms in on the boy's sled, propped in the corner.
Although the letters are faded, unmistakably we can read the word "EESH".
The little boy giggles in the darkness.
Fade to black.
Mommy is tucking her boy into bed for the night.
BOY: Mommy?
MOTHER: Yes, honey?
BOY: Someone's being mean to Cary again!
MOTHER: Oh, no! That's awful! Cary is going to spank that mean boy!
And he's going to delete allll his posts very, very quietly... And secretly!
So that no one will ever know!
BOY: But didn't Cary says he never deletes nothin'?
MOTHER: Actually, honey, what he said is that he'll never delete a
"legitimate" post. Of course, that promise was never meant to include
"garbage"!
BOY: What's "garbage," Mommy?
MOTHER: Whatever Cary says it is, ya little brat. Now take this pill
and go to sleep.
She stalks out of the room, slamming the door behind her.
The camera slowly zooms in on the boy's sled, propped in the corner.
Although the letters are faded, unmistakably we can read the word "EESH".
The little boy giggles in the darkness.
Fade to black.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
poor guy
()
Date: March 14, 2015 07:14PM
Poor guy can't afford a lawyer and is about to get screwed. I think we can chip in and help him out if he publicly writes and signs a promissory letter stating that he will never stalk, harass, threaten, attempt to out, defame or wrongfully accuse another person again.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dane Bramage
()
Date: March 14, 2015 08:59PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> do,
> > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > proceeding.
>
>
> Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> out.
It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one explain posts like that to parents?
"Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies, Mom."
-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> do,
> > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > proceeding.
>
>
> Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> out.
It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one explain posts like that to parents?
"Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies, Mom."
-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Jury Instructions
()
Date: March 14, 2015 09:27PM
...
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
^smh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:06PM
Hey guise,
Y'all know that Cary is just chomping at the bit to delete this entire thread.
As "garbage," natch.
Go ahead, Cary.
I dare you.
Y'all know that Cary is just chomping at the bit to delete this entire thread.
As "garbage," natch.
Go ahead, Cary.
I dare you.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
We get it
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:13PM
eesh outed you and Cary didn't delete your info and you have never gotten over it. We get it. Deal with it. Stop crying.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A rock feels no pain.
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:15PM
And an island never cries.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Heh.
()
Date: March 14, 2015 10:15PM
Not bad for an alleged "troll"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
a broke ass bitch
()
Date: March 14, 2015 11:55PM
Who the duck pays $1.99 for 100 minutes?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
huh
()
Date: March 14, 2015 11:56PM
a broke ass bitch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who the duck pays $1.99 for 100 minutes?
What the puck is pinger?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who the duck pays $1.99 for 100 minutes?
What the puck is pinger?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dollar store ho
()
Date: March 14, 2015 11:58PM
huh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> a broke ass bitch Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Who the duck pays $1.99 for 100 minutes?
>
>
>
> What the puck is pinger?
Your auto correct is hilarious! Btw, pinger is a texting app for people with no credit or money.
-------------------------------------------------------
> a broke ass bitch Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Who the duck pays $1.99 for 100 minutes?
>
>
>
> What the puck is pinger?
Your auto correct is hilarious! Btw, pinger is a texting app for people with no credit or money.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tray peon still dead
()
Date: March 14, 2015 11:59PM
Eesh is still fucked.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Credit
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:03AM
But pinger has you buy mintes with a credit card
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Iphone 6 Plus Here
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:04AM
It's for people who don't want to give out their real Iphone number
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Iphone 6 Plus with Pinger
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:09AM
Got money, got credit
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not funny at all
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:11AM
Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > uberX Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> > do,
> > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > proceeding.
> >
> >
> > Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> > out.
>
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Are you retarded?
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > uberX Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> > do,
> > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > proceeding.
> >
> >
> > Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> > out.
>
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Are you retarded?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:25AM
Sprint...lolol
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Sprint for 16 years
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:27AM
Free iPhones for life. What do you have? T-slowbile or TNT?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
sorry but...
()
Date: March 15, 2015 12:44AM
Credit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But pinger has you buy mintes with a credit card
Your mom's credit card doesn't mean you have good credit, mo.
-------------------------------------------------------
> But pinger has you buy mintes with a credit card
Your mom's credit card doesn't mean you have good credit, mo.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
o;sljf
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:07AM
not funny at all Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dane Bramage Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > uberX Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think
> I
> > > do,
> > > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > > proceeding.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please do, I encourage all to come and check
> it
> > > out.
> >
> > It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> > insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does
> one
> > explain posts like that to parents?
> >
> > "Well. I didn't really mean that about the
> babies,
> > Mom."
>
> Are you retarded?
Dane makes a good point.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dane Bramage Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > uberX Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think
> I
> > > do,
> > > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > > proceeding.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please do, I encourage all to come and check
> it
> > > out.
> >
> > It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> > insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does
> one
> > explain posts like that to parents?
> >
> > "Well. I didn't really mean that about the
> babies,
> > Mom."
>
> Are you retarded?
Dane makes a good point.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Jhtpm
()
Date: March 15, 2015 03:04AM
3 things
1 misery was joking in the baby thread if any of you dumbfucks ever actually read it
2 eesh will not fuck with the op, guaranteed, I have a feeling the op would QUICKLY take eesh to court
3 eesh "thinks" he has a handle on the court cases, he does not
wait until the miz family gets a hold of him, this case on this thread is the smallest one just between miz and eesh
1 misery was joking in the baby thread if any of you dumbfucks ever actually read it
2 eesh will not fuck with the op, guaranteed, I have a feeling the op would QUICKLY take eesh to court
3 eesh "thinks" he has a handle on the court cases, he does not
wait until the miz family gets a hold of him, this case on this thread is the smallest one just between miz and eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jmlxp
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:39AM
Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit. Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to sue Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or so but that's the price to pay for justice.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
2018
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:40AM
The world is ending in 2016..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fpjmh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:44AM
2018 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The world is ending in 2016..
The world is ending for the defendants Northman eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with the Miz family.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The world is ending in 2016..
The world is ending for the defendants Northman eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with the Miz family.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hLEVJ
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:44AM
jmlxp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to sue
> Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or so
> but that's the price to pay for justice.
Good luck suing a special ed minor and a broke nog and elusive Cary
-------------------------------------------------------
> Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to sue
> Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or so
> but that's the price to pay for justice.
Good luck suing a special ed minor and a broke nog and elusive Cary
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jvelw
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:45AM
You idiots want to fuck with a rich family you got to pay the price.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
John's Dough
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:48AM
fpjmh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2018 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The world is ending in 2016..
>
>
> The world is ending for the defendants Northman
> eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with the
> Miz family.
Poor John Doe he can never catch a break
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2018 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The world is ending in 2016..
>
>
> The world is ending for the defendants Northman
> eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with the
> Miz family.
Poor John Doe he can never catch a break
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
cease and desist
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:48AM
Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > uberX Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> > do,
> > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > proceeding.
> >
> >
> > Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> > out.
>
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Unless you want to be included in the next suit I suggest you stop. Your post is close to defamation.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > uberX Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> > do,
> > > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > > proceeding.
> >
> >
> > Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> > out.
>
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Unless you want to be included in the next suit I suggest you stop. Your post is close to defamation.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
3XpnXIll
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:50AM
John's Dough Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fpjmh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 2018 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The world is ending in 2016..
> >
> >
> > The world is ending for the defendants Northman
> > eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with
> the
> > Miz family.
>
>
> Poor John Doe he can never catch a break
Can't believe they haven't found Northman
-------------------------------------------------------
> fpjmh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 2018 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The world is ending in 2016..
> >
> >
> > The world is ending for the defendants Northman
> > eesh lizzie caan and Cary. You don't fuck with
> the
> > Miz family.
>
>
> Poor John Doe he can never catch a break
Can't believe they haven't found Northman
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Whiz on Miz
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:05AM
> > It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> > insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does
> one
> > explain posts like that to parents?
> >
> > "Well. I didn't really mean that about the
> babies,
> > Mom."
>
>
> Unless you want to be included in the next suit I
> suggest you stop. Your post is close to
> defamation.
What?! It's "close" to defamation to ask how dude explained to his mother about his posts about fucking babies in the ass? You're almost as bad as Toohey with your poor cognizance. It was awesome that you got arrested, even having no facts, I am of the opinion that you did everything eesh reported you for.
People may use the word pedo for someone that posts repeatedly about having inappropriate relationships with infants. Is that correct usage? Because even if miz was joking, that's the joke right? Hahaha aren't pedophiles funny?
> > insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does
> one
> > explain posts like that to parents?
> >
> > "Well. I didn't really mean that about the
> babies,
> > Mom."
>
>
> Unless you want to be included in the next suit I
> suggest you stop. Your post is close to
> defamation.
What?! It's "close" to defamation to ask how dude explained to his mother about his posts about fucking babies in the ass? You're almost as bad as Toohey with your poor cognizance. It was awesome that you got arrested, even having no facts, I am of the opinion that you did everything eesh reported you for.
People may use the word pedo for someone that posts repeatedly about having inappropriate relationships with infants. Is that correct usage? Because even if miz was joking, that's the joke right? Hahaha aren't pedophiles funny?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
That's the joke
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:08AM
It's so funny when people take a troll/mocking/sarcastic post seriously
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
That's the joke
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:09AM
But even the OP tried to say eesh defamed him by calling him old man and he knows better. I think this entire thing is a troll thread.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dano Wells
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:17AM
Well duh. Nobody is left on this site but trolls.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
NbjtF
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:28AM
Dano Wells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well duh. Nobody is left on this site but trolls.
Hmmmm
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well duh. Nobody is left on this site but trolls.
Hmmmm
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
what if i told you...
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:38AM
op is eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Obvious troll post
()
Date: March 15, 2015 08:31AM
jmlxp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to sue
> Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or so
> but that's the price to pay for justice.
If you're going to sue someone the smart way to go about that is not to warn them ahead of time, giving them time to prepare their defense. Right?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to sue
> Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or so
> but that's the price to pay for justice.
If you're going to sue someone the smart way to go about that is not to warn them ahead of time, giving them time to prepare their defense. Right?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Hammy
()
Date: March 15, 2015 08:36AM
I know when that guy sued that ham sandwich he caught it off guard.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:22AM
That's the joke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But even the OP tried to say eesh defamed him by
> calling him old man and he knows better. I think
> this entire thing is a troll thread.
LOL I know, he tried to shut me up when I called him "old man." He also described everyone in the courtroom except for the old man.
Hit a little too close to home I guess.
-------------------------------------------------------
> But even the OP tried to say eesh defamed him by
> calling him old man and he knows better. I think
> this entire thing is a troll thread.
LOL I know, he tried to shut me up when I called him "old man." He also described everyone in the courtroom except for the old man.
Hit a little too close to home I guess.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:32AM
Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY aware of all the racist posts, suicidal posts, and all his pedophilia posts. I showed them to a detective from Loudoun County over the summer and I know he made them aware of what Misery has written.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It'd be fun to match a face to the incredibly
> insane posts Misery scribed. Exactly how does one
> explain posts like that to parents?
>
> "Well. I didn't really mean that about the babies,
> Mom."
Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY aware of all the racist posts, suicidal posts, and all his pedophilia posts. I showed them to a detective from Loudoun County over the summer and I know he made them aware of what Misery has written.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
million dollars
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:58AM
Eesh where are you gonna get the million dollars?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
sweet and sour Tea Tour
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:41AM
Meade will perform charity concerts for his biggest fan. FFXU made both of them famous.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
million dollars
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:10AM
sweet and sour Tea Tour Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade will perform charity concerts for his
> biggest fan. FFXU made both of them famous.
I think hes burned that bridge too.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade will perform charity concerts for his
> biggest fan. FFXU made both of them famous.
I think hes burned that bridge too.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not a million...
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:16AM
$2 per every post made by eesh, so about $120k settlement would be good.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
'off' buttons
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:18AM
You all know computers come with 'off' buttons - you do know that dont you?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Long time lurker
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:07PM
I remember back when lizzie posted a video of eesh harassing her mother on the telephone. Her mother asked eesh questions about himself and why he felt the need to harass people and stalk them offline. She annihilated to the point where he was blaming everyone else and was basically saying that everyone he harasses and stalks needs to be run off the website for annoying him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
prayer time
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:17PM
Lets all of us join hands in prayer. God we thank you for not making us like eesh. God, we ask you to keep us on the righteous path so that we never become like eesh. Amen.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
backpage eesh?
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:18PM
Maybe eesh can come up to Fairfax and work on backpage every weekend to pay down his debts.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
PvutH
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:24PM
backpage eesh? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe eesh can come up to Fairfax and work on
> backpage every weekend to pay down his debts.
Why come all the way up here when they have that in Richmond too?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Maybe eesh can come up to Fairfax and work on
> backpage every weekend to pay down his debts.
Why come all the way up here when they have that in Richmond too?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
20 an hour
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:25PM
Working his booty in a motel 6, he would do great.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
out of caan troll
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:34PM
Obvious troll post Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jmlxp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> > Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to
> sue
> > Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or
> so
> > but that's the price to pay for justice.
>
>
>
> If you're going to sue someone the smart way to go
> about that is not to warn them ahead of time,
> giving them time to prepare their defense. Right?
they wouldn't even waste their time going through this a second time with anyone else - caan and lizzie had nothing to do with anything misery related or they would have been named the first time around and betterthanyoubitch and megan have no cases on anyone nor the funds to pursue anything
-------------------------------------------------------
> jmlxp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Caan and lizzie are included in the next suit.
> > Then when that's done Miz's sister is going to
> sue
> > Cary and eesh. This won't be over until 2018 or
> so
> > but that's the price to pay for justice.
>
>
>
> If you're going to sue someone the smart way to go
> about that is not to warn them ahead of time,
> giving them time to prepare their defense. Right?
they wouldn't even waste their time going through this a second time with anyone else - caan and lizzie had nothing to do with anything misery related or they would have been named the first time around and betterthanyoubitch and megan have no cases on anyone nor the funds to pursue anything
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
??
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:40PM
who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HEY EESH
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:44PM
What's the name of the judge who is hearing this matter?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Fat whores love posting nudes
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:49PM
?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
Some other fat whore who posted her naked picture to this site.
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
Some other fat whore who posted her naked picture to this site.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
trial of the century
()
Date: March 15, 2015 01:53PM
HEY EESH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's the name of the judge who is hearing this
> matter?
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What's the name of the judge who is hearing this
> matter?
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Xxh7Y
()
Date: March 15, 2015 02:00PM
?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/886890.html
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/886890.html
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
GK4KT
()
Date: March 15, 2015 02:04PM
trial of the century Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HEY EESH Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What's the name of the judge who is hearing
> this
> > matter?
It's possible, but unlikely, that the case has been assigned to a judge yet. The judge that heard the motions on Friday may not hear anything else in the case again. Or she could. No way of knowing.
-------------------------------------------------------
> HEY EESH Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What's the name of the judge who is hearing
> this
> > matter?
It's possible, but unlikely, that the case has been assigned to a judge yet. The judge that heard the motions on Friday may not hear anything else in the case again. Or she could. No way of knowing.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Buttz
()
Date: March 15, 2015 02:09PM
This website is too funny lol. What made her think that was a good idea at the time?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Mr. Ed
()
Date: March 15, 2015 02:15PM
Buttz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This website is too funny lol. What made her think
> that was a good idea at the time?
You can lead a whore to water but you can't make her think..
-------------------------------------------------------
> This website is too funny lol. What made her think
> that was a good idea at the time?
You can lead a whore to water but you can't make her think..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HEY EESH
()
Date: March 15, 2015 02:49PM
What was the name of the judge who gave you ten days to file a new motion or an answer?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Henrico's Finest Magistrate
()
Date: March 15, 2015 03:31PM
20 an hour Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Working his booty in a motel 6, he would do great.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
(scratching not-recently-shaved chin)
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got -- what was that number
again, Mike? Ah, yes.
And on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh" for stalking
and other "sociopathic" activities which he admitted, and indeed
boasted of engaging in.
--Eh, what? Oh, yes! I almost forgot! And, in addition, one animated
gift. Eh, what's that? Gif..?! Is that how you say it, Mike?
(shakes head)
Hmmph. Funny word. Never heard of such a thing.
Anywho, one animated... gif... that purports to show Mr. Basl engaged
in a lewd and/or obscene dance. ...Turrible... just turrible...
Which posts Mr. Basl is convinced were made by Meade Skelton,
although none of the posts was actually known to have been made
by that scoundrel, er, I mean by or under the name of Mr. Skelton.
Given the overwhelming abundance of evidence of Mr. Skelton's
harassment of Mr. Basl, I conclude that the scales of justice tilt heavily in
favor of Mr. Basl, and find probable cause to arrest Meade Skelton for
harassing an innocent citizen of this Commonwealth.
...There!
He signs the warrant with a flourish, hands it to Basl.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Good luck catching this scoundrel, Mike. It's just turrible the way he's
been harassing you!
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! You can't imagine the terrible stress I've
been under as a result of this campaign of harassment. Indeed, I'm
in fear of my life!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Working his booty in a motel 6, he would do great.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
(scratching not-recently-shaved chin)
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got -- what was that number
again, Mike? Ah, yes.
And on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh" for stalking
and other "sociopathic" activities which he admitted, and indeed
boasted of engaging in.
--Eh, what? Oh, yes! I almost forgot! And, in addition, one animated
gift. Eh, what's that? Gif..?! Is that how you say it, Mike?
(shakes head)
Hmmph. Funny word. Never heard of such a thing.
Anywho, one animated... gif... that purports to show Mr. Basl engaged
in a lewd and/or obscene dance. ...Turrible... just turrible...
Which posts Mr. Basl is convinced were made by Meade Skelton,
although none of the posts was actually known to have been made
by that scoundrel, er, I mean by or under the name of Mr. Skelton.
Given the overwhelming abundance of evidence of Mr. Skelton's
harassment of Mr. Basl, I conclude that the scales of justice tilt heavily in
favor of Mr. Basl, and find probable cause to arrest Meade Skelton for
harassing an innocent citizen of this Commonwealth.
...There!
He signs the warrant with a flourish, hands it to Basl.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Good luck catching this scoundrel, Mike. It's just turrible the way he's
been harassing you!
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! You can't imagine the terrible stress I've
been under as a result of this campaign of harassment. Indeed, I'm
in fear of my life!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
white knight
()
Date: March 15, 2015 03:38PM
Buttz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This website is too funny lol. What made her think
> that was a good idea at the time?
I would berry my dick so far inside her ass, who ever could pull it out would be crowned King Arthur
-------------------------------------------------------
> This website is too funny lol. What made her think
> that was a good idea at the time?
I would berry my dick so far inside her ass, who ever could pull it out would be crowned King Arthur
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Bury
()
Date: March 15, 2015 04:10PM
Berry? Black or blue?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 15, 2015 04:19PM
Xxh7Y Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ?? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
> 6890.html
Another fine example of a female who was asking for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried to play the victim role when her name and face were connected to them.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ?? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
> 6890.html
Another fine example of a female who was asking for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried to play the victim role when her name and face were connected to them.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tee hee
()
Date: March 15, 2015 04:33PM
Hi there... I see you, my little friend. And you can run..................... but you can't hide!
PS:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Where eesh at?
()
Date: March 15, 2015 04:41PM
Dude, I axed you a question!
What was the name of the judge who gave you ten days to file a new motion or an answer?
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Oh, yeah.
And one other thing.
Where Wallace at?
Uhm, eesh...?
What was the name of the judge who gave you ten days to file a new motion or an answer?
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Oh, yeah.
And one other thing.
Where Wallace at?
Uhm, eesh...?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Pop Quiz
()
Date: March 15, 2015 04:52PM
@ Cary
There's a very interesting exception to the otherwise extensive protection provided by section 230.
Do you recall what it is?
...I do.
There's a very interesting exception to the otherwise extensive protection provided by section 230.
Do you recall what it is?
...I do.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Weird guy above
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:44PM
Okay give it a rest or lay off the speed
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I think..
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:51PM
That's Mr. Misery..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Still
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:54PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
TL;DR
-------------------------------------------------------
> I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule
> this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as
> much as I could of today's proceedings in the case
> of Misery v. Eesh.
>
> My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh
> is in a lot of trouble here.
>
> First, the atmospherics...
>
> The court was entertaining pretrial and
> interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> trials and so, for the most part, those present in
> and addressing the court were attorneys for
> plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their
> motions before the court.
>
> Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat
> together in the back row until their case was
> called.
>
> Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki
> pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy
> was conservatively dressed in black in what
> appeared to be business attire and running shoes.
> While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> that the court was in session, she left the
> courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery
> v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> missed most of the proceedings.
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
> Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and
> a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> himself well professionally during and after the
> proceedings.
>
> The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh
> was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> Underground users who are not attorneys) means he
> was without counsel.
>
> The purpose of today's proceedings was for the
> court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case.
> As best as I can understand it (I did not speak
> to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit
> within the time period required by law and still
> had not filed a response. As a general matter,
> when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party)
> will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> against the defendant (the person who is being
> sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
> Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking
> the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule
> that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> plaintiff).
>
>
> Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in
> favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> asserting that the suit and notice had been
> properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court
> proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not
> responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He
> asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> declined to make a summary judgement in favor of
> Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys
> fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the
> case without summary judgement.
>
> Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> defense to not having responded to the suit.
> Instead, contended that he had not been properly
> served and asked the judge to quash service.
>
> The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> service had been properly made; that Eesh had not
> responded at all, let alone within the timeframes
> required by law; and that grounds were there for
> summary judgement. She indicated however, that
> she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro
> Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> suit, as well as for his motion to quash service
> -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> failure to properly file it.
>
> Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the
> situation he is in and of what he needs to do in
> order to defend himself, saying several times that
> he has no legal training; that he is attending
> school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney
> who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> which he did not have.
>
> The judge was having none of it.
>
> She told him that he was gambling by not having
> counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to
> talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects
> of court procedure. He was unable to
> satisfactorily answer her.
>
> In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
> She denied both the motion for summary judgement
> and the motion to quash service. However, she
> gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit
> or properly file a motion to quash service,
> whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied
> that request without prejudice, saying that the
> attorney could bring that up again at the
> appropriate time.
>
> Eesh is in trouble.
>
> My free legal advice to him is ...
>
> First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one,
> SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This
> is a significant case that could have implications
> far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that
> there are attorneys and organizations out there
> who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take
> on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You
> have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> represented, as well.
>
> Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until
> this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> post can help you. But you have no idea how
> things you might post might hurt you.
>
> Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I
> offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of
> her), you might not want to show up with her in
> court. If you want her to be a witness for you,
> she might not be permitted to testify on your
> behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior
> proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony
> charges against her (although, from what I can
> tell, those charges might well be bogus).
>
> More later...
TL;DR
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
observer of tactics
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:59PM
^ strategic post by eesh to avoid having something embarrassing posted about him at the top of page 4.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
W6yjk
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:04PM
?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/886890.html
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/886890.html
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
snot eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:15PM
Pop Quiz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @ Cary
>
> There's a very interesting exception to the
> otherwise extensive protection provided by section
> 230.
>
> Do you recall what it is?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...I do.
>
>
Psssst.
Don't tell Cary about this post.
If he sees it, he might wise up and stop cooperating.
-------------------------------------------------------
> @ Cary
>
> There's a very interesting exception to the
> otherwise extensive protection provided by section
> 230.
>
> Do you recall what it is?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...I do.
>
>
Psssst.
Don't tell Cary about this post.
If he sees it, he might wise up and stop cooperating.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourlegs
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:22PM
Miz needs to post under one name ^^^^^^^^
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Yourgay
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:22PM
How come the cat picture showed up in the quote? That never happens.
Unless it is the same person who posted it in the first place.
Unless it is the same person who posted it in the first place.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
YOUR gay!
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:24PM
Chesire cats have a way of doing that!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Conspiracy Failz
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:25PM
Yourgay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How come the cat picture showed up in the quote?
> That never happens.
> Unless it is the same person who posted it in the
> first place.
They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't get broken across lines in the quote.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How come the cat picture showed up in the quote?
> That never happens.
> Unless it is the same person who posted it in the
> first place.
They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't get broken across lines in the quote.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
UxjCe
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:25PM
fourlegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Miz needs to post under one name ^^^^^^^^
-------------------------------------------------------
> Miz needs to post under one name ^^^^^^^^
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Marlow
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:28PM
Conspiracy Failz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't
> get broken across lines in the quote.
That which can be broken must be broken.
-------------------------------------------------------
> They do when it's done inline and the URL doesn't
> get broken across lines in the quote.
That which can be broken must be broken.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
So nice I posted it twice!
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:38PM
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
(scratching not-recently-shaved chin)
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got -- what was that number
again, Mike? Ah, yes.
And on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh" for stalking
and other "sociopathic" activities which he admitted, and indeed
boasted of engaging in.
--Eh, what? Oh, yes! I almost forgot! And, in addition, one animated
gift. Eh, what's that? Gif..?! Is that how you say it, Mike?
(shakes head)
Hmmph. Funny word. Never heard of such a thing.
Anywho, one animated... gif... that purports to show Mr. Basl engaged
in a lewd and/or obscene dance. ...Turrible... just turrible...
Which posts Mr. Basl is convinced were made by Meade Skelton,
although none of the posts was actually known to have been made
by that scoundrel, er, I mean by or under the name of Mr. Skelton.
Given the overwhelming abundance of evidence of Mr. Skelton's
harassment of Mr. Basl, I conclude that the scales of justice tilt heavily in
favor of Mr. Basl, and find probable cause to arrest Meade Skelton for
harassing an innocent citizen of this Commonwealth.
...There!
He signs the warrant with a flourish, hands it to Basl.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Good luck catching this scoundrel, Mike. It's just turrible the way he's
been harassing you!
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! You can't imagine the terrible stress I've
been under as a result of this campaign of harassment. Indeed, I'm
in fear of my life!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
backpage backdoor eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 07:42PM
I know some niggas who would like to tear that white ass up!
It's the only way eesh will be able to make money without having it garnished, LOL!
It's the only way eesh will be able to make money without having it garnished, LOL!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 08:28PM
Where eesh at? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dude, I axed you a question!
>
> What was the name of the judge who gave you ten
> days to file a new motion or an answer?
>
> ANSWER THE QUESTION.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dude, I axed you a question!
>
> What was the name of the judge who gave you ten
> days to file a new motion or an answer?
>
> ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 08:34PM
Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.
Ah yes, BTYB. She posted her cell phone number and pic on 4LULZ, and was outed shortly afterwards.
A reasonable person could look at her outing and subsequent running off the site and ask "who would do such a thing?"
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.
Ah yes, BTYB. She posted her cell phone number and pic on 4LULZ, and was outed shortly afterwards.
A reasonable person could look at her outing and subsequent running off the site and ask "who would do such a thing?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cy
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:08PM
I'm always amazed at the talent of many posters to put together some fine arts. I'm computer illiterate. And an idiot.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Immokalee is for you.
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:26PM
Why bother going to school at this point, you will never be able to get a decent paying job. Move to Florida and pick tomatoes for 2 cents per pound, that's just about the only employment you will ever be able to get. Even gas station applicants get googled these days. LMAO you are screwed, the cherry on top is the shoplifting charge. Granted it was thrown out it is never really thrown out and prospective employers don't hire thieves. Any job application you fill out will be a waste of ink and will end up in the trash can.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:33PM
This might be a good thread to post this in as there seem to be some posters with legal experience here.
Does anyone have experience with the Witness Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good program, I might check it out. VINE looks especially helpful.
#refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
Does anyone have experience with the Witness Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good program, I might check it out. VINE looks especially helpful.
#refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
e clinton
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:37PM
Durf633636173(4728 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> @eesh
> --------------------------------------------------
> what exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?
Hilar
-------------------------------------------------------
> @eesh
> --------------------------------------------------
> what exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?
Hilar
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Doing the most
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:40PM
You're doing too much eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
DanoWells
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:50PM
Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at anticipating consequences. They are also the ones that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on top.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dr oz
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:57PM
DanoWells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at
> anticipating consequences. They are also the ones
> that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on
> top.
They should all be committed to a mental hospital...permanently.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at
> anticipating consequences. They are also the ones
> that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on
> top.
They should all be committed to a mental hospital...permanently.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:02PM
lizzie is a good person. She may have made some mistakes in the past, but I believe that she means well and strives for a better world. She has a lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that everything works out well for her.
Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because her accuser is so discreditable.
As in the computer harassment case in Henrico, when I take the witness stand with my clean record (no criminal convictions!), I can be confidant that I will be seen as a credible witness.
Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because her accuser is so discreditable.
As in the computer harassment case in Henrico, when I take the witness stand with my clean record (no criminal convictions!), I can be confidant that I will be seen as a credible witness.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
petty criminal
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:06PM
Arent you a petty shop lifter?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh the thief
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:12PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> As in the computer harassment case in Henrico,
> when I take the witness stand with my clean record
> (no criminal convictions!)
Theft is a crime = you are criminal
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> As in the computer harassment case in Henrico,
> when I take the witness stand with my clean record
> (no criminal convictions!)
Theft is a crime = you are criminal
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:23PM
There seems to be some concern about whether or not I have a criminal record. As someone that recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can put any concerns to rest. You can't have these permits and licenses with a felony record or a misdemeanor conviction (within the past three years.)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
sw
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:29PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
so is the new date in April?
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
so is the new date in April?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
American Sniper
()
Date: March 15, 2015 10:40PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
Question- why do you feel the need to validate yourself to anyone associated with this cesspool?
You disclose way too much personal information on here. I know you aren't a teenager but you sure act like one.
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
Question- why do you feel the need to validate yourself to anyone associated with this cesspool?
You disclose way too much personal information on here. I know you aren't a teenager but you sure act like one.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dumbass...
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:15PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This might be a good thread to post this in as
> there seem to be some posters with legal
> experience here.
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> especially helpful.
>
>
> #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how serious you are about the threat.
-------------------------------------------------------
> This might be a good thread to post this in as
> there seem to be some posters with legal
> experience here.
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> especially helpful.
>
>
> #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how serious you are about the threat.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Isn't That Wonderful
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:24PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
Does that make you gunnuts feel good? Maybe now you know how the rest of us feel.
-------------------------------------------------------
> There seems to be some concern about whether or
> not I have a criminal record. As someone that
> recently renewed his Virginia concealed carry
> permit, and obtained a Utah concealed firearm
> permit and Florida concealed weapon license, I can
> put any concerns to rest. You can't have these
> permits and licenses with a felony record or a
> misdemeanor conviction (within the past three
> years.)
Does that make you gunnuts feel good? Maybe now you know how the rest of us feel.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:25PM
dumbass... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how
> serious you are about the threat.
I'm taking it quite seriously. Please let me know if you have any experience with the Witness Assistance Program. Are the advocates helpful at trial? Is VINE timely and accurate? Let me know.
-thanks
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well yeah, that lets everyone know just how
> serious you are about the threat.
I'm taking it quite seriously. Please let me know if you have any experience with the Witness Assistance Program. Are the advocates helpful at trial? Is VINE timely and accurate? Let me know.
-thanks
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
AllFacts
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:39PM
- Petit Larceny
X Eluding Police
X Reckless Driving
Now I suppose it all comes down to your own personal definition of "criminal". I forget if we include misdemeanors, or if it's only felonies and up around here. People do get shat on pretty hard in the threads when seeking advice for beating a speeding and/or reckless driving ticket to avoid a license suspension. There are 3 degrees of Eluding Police in VA; 1 misdemeanor, the other 2 felonies.
I don't see three-years mentioned anywhere in there, but I do see five-years, which works out pretty well with the timing of it all. Sounds more like a fresh CCW permit application, rather than a renewal.
§ 18.2-308.09. Disqualifications for a concealed handgun permit:
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308.09
Attachments:
X Eluding Police
X Reckless Driving
Now I suppose it all comes down to your own personal definition of "criminal". I forget if we include misdemeanors, or if it's only felonies and up around here. People do get shat on pretty hard in the threads when seeking advice for beating a speeding and/or reckless driving ticket to avoid a license suspension. There are 3 degrees of Eluding Police in VA; 1 misdemeanor, the other 2 felonies.
I don't see three-years mentioned anywhere in there, but I do see five-years, which works out pretty well with the timing of it all. Sounds more like a fresh CCW permit application, rather than a renewal.
§ 18.2-308.09. Disqualifications for a concealed handgun permit:
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-308.09
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
criminal loser
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:43PM
Go play in traffic and you won't have to worry about any of this.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:46PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> mistakes in the past, but I believe that she means
> well and strives for a better world. She has a
> lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> everything works out well for her.
Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to make me out to be such a horrible person all these years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.
Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty much every time I've been arrested was because I wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had overcome my issues. With this most recent thing I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.
Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger, worthless and useless to society but that shows how you people have no idea what I do in this community other than what you see me post here. No one ever talks about the time I risked my life and stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to help a family of geese cross the road. People were taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was great. You don't know I volunteer to help out homeless people and give them hope and actually just take the time out to sit and listen to them talk, acknowledge their existence, take their advice and try to learn from their mistakes.
No one has ever seen a single post of someone I know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because I am a totally different person offline than I am online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis as I was recently.
They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart and the patience to go help as a caregiver for adults with developmental disabilities and try to better myself and my life and learn some valuable skills for a future career.
They think all I do is sit here and troll all day and have and never will do anything with my life but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up after being knocked down.
My trolls think they know me based on what I post here or some criminal record that I have never let stop me from trying in life but those in our community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep the peace and make people smile.
I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach for my goals and live my dream of helping others. Make fun of me for living with my parents, so what? There are many people older than me living with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to make it out there or out there stealing from people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of me for working in fast food, it's better than still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting others for money and I am still going to school to learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being a menace to society and robbing people, hurting them and actually being a "career criminal" to survive.
Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about you than it does me to make fun of someone with obvious mental issues who actually has been trying and will continue to try to right my wrongs in life!
You say I have no life and stay here all day and night well I sure think that's a lot better than having me out on the street committing crimes, now isn't it?!
> Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is
> everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe
> lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because
> her accuser is so discreditable.
Even she knows that I make people happy. You rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and anyone who's near me without one either.
People here have told me that I should "off myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so much life left to live and so much to live for. Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I always have a smile on my face no matter what's going on because I have hope and know that things always do get better!
And people always trip out about how I always "get away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't match my character at all and even the police know this. The things I've done are usually random and out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here as who I am but do the things you all post here match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This website is an outlet for me and I would hope most people here are NOT like the persona they portray here.
Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help those with special needs or worked with children? Have I made someone smile today? What does trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person would I be as bold in person to say all the things I say to her to her face?
I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma and deal with everything I've been handed in life but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 01:42AM by lizzie.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> mistakes in the past, but I believe that she means
> well and strives for a better world. She has a
> lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> everything works out well for her.
Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to make me out to be such a horrible person all these years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.
Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty much every time I've been arrested was because I wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had overcome my issues. With this most recent thing I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.
Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger, worthless and useless to society but that shows how you people have no idea what I do in this community other than what you see me post here. No one ever talks about the time I risked my life and stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to help a family of geese cross the road. People were taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was great. You don't know I volunteer to help out homeless people and give them hope and actually just take the time out to sit and listen to them talk, acknowledge their existence, take their advice and try to learn from their mistakes.
No one has ever seen a single post of someone I know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because I am a totally different person offline than I am online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis as I was recently.
They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart and the patience to go help as a caregiver for adults with developmental disabilities and try to better myself and my life and learn some valuable skills for a future career.
They think all I do is sit here and troll all day and have and never will do anything with my life but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up after being knocked down.
My trolls think they know me based on what I post here or some criminal record that I have never let stop me from trying in life but those in our community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep the peace and make people smile.
I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach for my goals and live my dream of helping others. Make fun of me for living with my parents, so what? There are many people older than me living with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to make it out there or out there stealing from people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of me for working in fast food, it's better than still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting others for money and I am still going to school to learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being a menace to society and robbing people, hurting them and actually being a "career criminal" to survive.
Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about you than it does me to make fun of someone with obvious mental issues who actually has been trying and will continue to try to right my wrongs in life!
You say I have no life and stay here all day and night well I sure think that's a lot better than having me out on the street committing crimes, now isn't it?!
> Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread) is
> everything in criminal proceedings, and I believe
> lizzie will get out of her recent troubles because
> her accuser is so discreditable.
Even she knows that I make people happy. You rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and anyone who's near me without one either.
People here have told me that I should "off myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so much life left to live and so much to live for. Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I always have a smile on my face no matter what's going on because I have hope and know that things always do get better!
And people always trip out about how I always "get away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't match my character at all and even the police know this. The things I've done are usually random and out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here as who I am but do the things you all post here match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This website is an outlet for me and I would hope most people here are NOT like the persona they portray here.
Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help those with special needs or worked with children? Have I made someone smile today? What does trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person would I be as bold in person to say all the things I say to her to her face?
I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma and deal with everything I've been handed in life but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 01:42AM by lizzie.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 15, 2015 11:52PM
Traffic misdemeanors are not included as part of a criminal history. If that was the case, a huge chunk of Virginians would have criminal records as Virginia loves reckless driving charges and speed traps.
Even in the statute that you quote, §18.2-308.09, you will notice that paragraph 7 clearly states that traffic misdemeanors are not disqualifiers.
7. An individual who has been convicted of two or more misdemeanors within the five-year period immediately preceding the application, if one of the misdemeanors was a Class 1 misdemeanor, but the judge shall have the discretion to deny a permit for two or more misdemeanors that are not Class 1. Traffic infractions and misdemeanors set forth in Title 46.2 shall not be considered for purposes of this disqualification.
Thanks, please try again.
Even in the statute that you quote, §18.2-308.09, you will notice that paragraph 7 clearly states that traffic misdemeanors are not disqualifiers.
7. An individual who has been convicted of two or more misdemeanors within the five-year period immediately preceding the application, if one of the misdemeanors was a Class 1 misdemeanor, but the judge shall have the discretion to deny a permit for two or more misdemeanors that are not Class 1. Traffic infractions and misdemeanors set forth in Title 46.2 shall not be considered for purposes of this disqualification.
Thanks, please try again.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
AllFacts
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:05AM
I stand corrected. Missed that 'not' in the last sentence. And with that I'll now say that I'm sure it was a CCW permit renewal as you said it was.
The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton disregard for the safety of others.
The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton disregard for the safety of others.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
concerned taxpayer
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:08AM
Is there not something better we could be paying judges to do?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
RE: lizzie
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:08AM
Lizzie, you may be telling the truth here. As a black person in a predominately white area one would think with your record you would have gotten the book thrown at you long ago. You do seem mentally ill but not someone I would label as "crazy". You seem quite intelligent and I don't think you receive the credit for the good things you have contributed in life. That said, you should probably continue to use that intelligence for good instead of getting mixed up in the bad. You have time to turn your life around and now is that time.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:10AM
AllFacts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I stand corrected. Missed that 'not' in the last
> sentence. And with that I'll now say that I'm
> sure it was a CCW permit renewal as you said it
> was.
>
> The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only
> Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are
> high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton
> disregard for the safety of others.
It shows maturity on your part to accept defeat, good for you. In your lame effort to discredit a credible person with a clean record, you have grown and learned more about the law.
As far as "high-level misdemeanors", are you attempting to say Class 1 misdemeanor and Class 3 misdemeanor? Those were the charges...
I paid the $250 and $100 fine, and moved on. Perhaps you should do the same.
Fun fact! GEICO does not penalize people for attempted eluding and reckless driving. The actuaries at GEICO label those as speeding tickets. Yay!
-------------------------------------------------------
> I stand corrected. Missed that 'not' in the last
> sentence. And with that I'll now say that I'm
> sure it was a CCW permit renewal as you said it
> was.
>
> The rest is what it is. Speeding tickets are only
> Infractions, but RD above 80 and Eluding are
> high-level misdemeanors that show a wanton
> disregard for the safety of others.
It shows maturity on your part to accept defeat, good for you. In your lame effort to discredit a credible person with a clean record, you have grown and learned more about the law.
As far as "high-level misdemeanors", are you attempting to say Class 1 misdemeanor and Class 3 misdemeanor? Those were the charges...
I paid the $250 and $100 fine, and moved on. Perhaps you should do the same.
Fun fact! GEICO does not penalize people for attempted eluding and reckless driving. The actuaries at GEICO label those as speeding tickets. Yay!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:18AM
concerned taxpayer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there not something better we could be paying
> judges to do?
At the initial stage, as long as you pay the filing fees, the courts don't care. Later on though, if you put a bunch of bullshit and lies in your claims, the courts will dismiss the suit and impose sanctions.
For example, let's say a pipe froze in your home in the middle of winter, burst open, and flooded your basement. You then decide to sue a random person with claims that they broke into your home to cause a flood. You will need to have a factual basis for your claim; if you are simply trying to harass an individual with a lawsuit, the courts will come down on you.
Another example, let's say you sue someone with the claim that your home was "swatted." Well, if the local police department swears up and down that no SWAT team was ever deployed to your home, well, if looks like you could be brought up on felony perjury charges along with damages awarded to the defendant.
Stay tuned....
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there not something better we could be paying
> judges to do?
At the initial stage, as long as you pay the filing fees, the courts don't care. Later on though, if you put a bunch of bullshit and lies in your claims, the courts will dismiss the suit and impose sanctions.
For example, let's say a pipe froze in your home in the middle of winter, burst open, and flooded your basement. You then decide to sue a random person with claims that they broke into your home to cause a flood. You will need to have a factual basis for your claim; if you are simply trying to harass an individual with a lawsuit, the courts will come down on you.
Another example, let's say you sue someone with the claim that your home was "swatted." Well, if the local police department swears up and down that no SWAT team was ever deployed to your home, well, if looks like you could be brought up on felony perjury charges along with damages awarded to the defendant.
Stay tuned....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:21AM
@lizzie
You made good points. It's obvious from the angry, miserable people that call you racial slurs, that they are just trying to drag you down to their level.
I'm willing to bet that while you help and care for animals, the more malicious anonymous trolls in this thread probably take their misery out on animals. While you stop traffic to help animals cross the road, they probably run over animals for sport.
You made good points. It's obvious from the angry, miserable people that call you racial slurs, that they are just trying to drag you down to their level.
I'm willing to bet that while you help and care for animals, the more malicious anonymous trolls in this thread probably take their misery out on animals. While you stop traffic to help animals cross the road, they probably run over animals for sport.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
the facts of the case
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:22AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY aware
> of all the racist posts,
Racist posts? Examples, please.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY aware
> of all the racist posts,
Racist posts? Examples, please.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:26AM
Look up common racial slurs under his name that he posted, there is such an abundance of racial hatred, one could accurately call him racist.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WnbPb
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:28AM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/776247/776247.html#msg-776247
The Mr. Misery name has written nigger "54 times"
The Mr. Misery name has written nigger "54 times"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:31AM
He has used racial slurs to describe Asians, African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
blah blah bullshit
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:32AM
Mr. Ed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can lead a whore to water but you can't make
> her think..
writes a whore...
never met a man who wasn't one.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can lead a whore to water but you can't make
> her think..
writes a whore...
never met a man who wasn't one.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:44AM
the facts of the case Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY
> aware
> > of all the racist posts,
>
> Racist posts? Examples, please.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/685118/685399.html#msg-685399
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777708/778198.html#msg-778198
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/649932/649977.html#msg-649977
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Yeah, that's the thing. His parents are VERY
> aware
> > of all the racist posts,
>
> Racist posts? Examples, please.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/685118/685399.html#msg-685399
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777708/778198.html#msg-778198
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/649932/649977.html#msg-649977
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not 2 funny
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:55AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
You should pray that the jury is all male, with histories of mental illness, given your posts describing your hate and obsessive desire to torture females.
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
You should pray that the jury is all male, with histories of mental illness, given your posts describing your hate and obsessive desire to torture females.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
"some of my best friends are..."
()
Date: March 16, 2015 01:03AM
A vury happi MLK day ta allyall whitefolk!
Posted by: Black Adam ()
Date: January 17, 2011 07:36AM
It sho iz mityfine nice dat da guvament give us dis here day offs in remberence of Dr. King. Jus las week I waz gettin my carpets cleaned by two whiteboyz from Stanleysteamers an I waz thinkin ta myselfs that I sho do wishes dat Martin Luther waz here ta see dis! I iz getti dres up here in a few min so I can goes down to da black baptist church in Manaszaz an I will say me sum prayerz fo all my friends here on da fairfaxes undergrounds.
Yours in Christ
Black Adam
^^^^That's eesh posting as "Black Adam", a racist, anti-black character he posted as for several years.
Posted by: Black Adam ()
Date: January 17, 2011 07:36AM
It sho iz mityfine nice dat da guvament give us dis here day offs in remberence of Dr. King. Jus las week I waz gettin my carpets cleaned by two whiteboyz from Stanleysteamers an I waz thinkin ta myselfs that I sho do wishes dat Martin Luther waz here ta see dis! I iz getti dres up here in a few min so I can goes down to da black baptist church in Manaszaz an I will say me sum prayerz fo all my friends here on da fairfaxes undergrounds.
Yours in Christ
Black Adam
^^^^That's eesh posting as "Black Adam", a racist, anti-black character he posted as for several years.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
geese by wendy's
()
Date: March 16, 2015 01:15AM
wonder if those are the same geese that hang out by the fair oaks pond
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh clueless
()
Date: March 16, 2015 01:53AM
Eesh is clueless, he thinks these proceedings are going to be like ffxu. Where he'll simply troll misery and try to undermine and attack his character and the jury are going to be like ffxu readers. People that dont care and will pile on with the same run of the mill type attacks.
He believes hes going to call him a racist and he wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up boy. You're in the real world now.
He believes hes going to call him a racist and he wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up boy. You're in the real world now.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
What a joke
()
Date: March 16, 2015 03:03AM
Hahahaha Lizzie is like "I helped ducks this one time, I can do what I want!"
Maybe you should have some compassion for Megan toohey, or does she not get second (fifth, tenth, whatever) chances like you do? I mean after all those charges, if she's still free she must be doing great things for her community, by your logic.
I get that you're mentally ill, but I still think you're a bad person. I don't value you as an intelligent being enough to read the long paragraphs you wrote but I'm glad you haven't killed yourself yet.
Maybe you should have some compassion for Megan toohey, or does she not get second (fifth, tenth, whatever) chances like you do? I mean after all those charges, if she's still free she must be doing great things for her community, by your logic.
I get that you're mentally ill, but I still think you're a bad person. I don't value you as an intelligent being enough to read the long paragraphs you wrote but I'm glad you haven't killed yourself yet.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
What a joke
()
Date: March 16, 2015 03:09AM
A criminal is a criminal no matter how many charges. 1, 2 or 10!
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","018"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","09/19/2004","DOMESTIC ASSAULT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","019"," 11815","FEDERALIST 2 ","WY","FAIRFAX ","VA","12/30/2004","RECKLESS DRIVING GENERAL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","06/10/2006","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","07/07/2006","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","LIC PLATE IMPRO FASTND OR COVERED "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","BAD CHECK-NO FORGERY $200+ "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","CONTEMPT OF COURT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DWI-ALCOHOL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","DESTRUCTION-PRIV PROP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","CREDIT CARD FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","IDENTITY FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","05/10/2009","NO LIC OR IMPR LIC HELD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","BAILEE: VIOLATE COND OF RELEASE "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","FAIL TO APPEAR ON FELONY CHARGE "
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 24 04/06/2011 19.2-306 PROBATION: VIOLATION ON MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 02/05/2012 5-1-1 DRUNK IN PUBLIC OR PROFANE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 07/13/2012 82-1-6[46.2-301] LIC REVOKED: DR W/O LICENSE, 3+ OFF W/IN 10 YRS 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-192(1)(a) CREDIT CARD LARCENY: TAKE/OBTAIN NO. 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-195.2(B) CREDIT CARD APPLICATION: LARCENY, OBTAIN >=$200 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","018"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","09/19/2004","DOMESTIC ASSAULT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","019"," 11815","FEDERALIST 2 ","WY","FAIRFAX ","VA","12/30/2004","RECKLESS DRIVING GENERAL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","06/10/2006","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 410","MAGNOLIA ","CT","HERNDON ","VA","07/07/2006","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","020"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","LIC PLATE IMPRO FASTND OR COVERED "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","BAD CHECK-NO FORGERY $200+ "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","CONTEMPT OF COURT "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","021"," 3207","COBB HILL ","LA","OAKTON ","VA","12/05/2006","DWI-ALCOHOL "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","DESTRUCTION-PRIV PROP "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","FAIL ANSWER SUMMONS "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","022"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/31/2008","PT LARC-OTHER "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","CREDIT CARD FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5176","WOODFIELD ","DR","CENTREVILLE ","VA","01/21/2009","IDENTITY FRAUD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","05/10/2009","NO LIC OR IMPR LIC HELD "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","BAILEE: VIOLATE COND OF RELEASE "
"TOOHEY ","MEGAN ","E","023"," 5680","CHAPEL RUN ","CT","CENTREVILLE ","VA","06/14/2009","FAIL TO APPEAR ON FELONY CHARGE "
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 24 04/06/2011 19.2-306 PROBATION: VIOLATION ON MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 02/05/2012 5-1-1 DRUNK IN PUBLIC OR PROFANE 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 25 07/13/2012 82-1-6[46.2-301] LIC REVOKED: DR W/O LICENSE, 3+ OFF W/IN 10 YRS 7520 PURDUE CT, MANASSAS, VA
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-192(1)(a) CREDIT CARD LARCENY: TAKE/OBTAIN NO. 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120
TOOHEY MEGAN ELIZABETH 27 10/18/2013 18.2-195.2(B) CREDIT CARD APPLICATION: LARCENY, OBTAIN >=$200 5176 WOODFIELD DR CENTREVILLE, CENTREVILLE, VA 20120
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Peyton Wells
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:47AM
Lol I agree, and why are you stealing all my screen names? What a sore loser.
Both these hoes are criminals and deserve consequences.
Lizzie bullying megan negates her pleas for non-judgement in my eyes. If she was sincere, not just mad because she herself is inconvenienced, she would leave Megan's skank ass alone.
Both these hoes are criminals and deserve consequences.
Lizzie bullying megan negates her pleas for non-judgement in my eyes. If she was sincere, not just mad because she herself is inconvenienced, she would leave Megan's skank ass alone.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Thanks for showing Katie to us
()
Date: March 16, 2015 05:17AM
Megan + Lizzie = same thing
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
the whole lot of them
()
Date: March 16, 2015 05:35AM
Bunch of no life losers.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
very simple
()
Date: March 16, 2015 08:53AM
the whole lot of them Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bunch of no life losers.
Thats it. Very simple.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bunch of no life losers.
Thats it. Very simple.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
quit porn
()
Date: March 16, 2015 09:20AM
Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.
I don't give a shit. That ass is fucking great. Does she have more pics anywhere?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Xxh7Y Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > who the hell is betterthanyoubitch?
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/88
>
> > 6890.html
>
>
> Another fine example of a female who was asking
> for it, by taking nude photographs and then tried
> to play the victim role when her name and face
> were connected to them.
I don't give a shit. That ass is fucking great. Does she have more pics anywhere?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
attention whore lizzie
()
Date: March 16, 2015 11:26AM
FFXU look at me I'm a good person! I swear, I helped ducks cross the road!!!
I went to work on a retard farm not because I can't hold a job and had nowhere to go, but just because I'm a good gal.
I didn't assault those officers either, they assaulted me! #handsupdontshoot
I went to work on a retard farm not because I can't hold a job and had nowhere to go, but just because I'm a good gal.
I didn't assault those officers either, they assaulted me! #handsupdontshoot
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
its hilarious
()
Date: March 16, 2015 11:27AM
eesh clueless Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh is clueless, he thinks these proceedings are
> going to be like ffxu. Where he'll simply troll
> misery and try to undermine and attack his
> character and the jury are going to be like ffxu
> readers. People that dont care and will pile on
> with the same run of the mill type attacks.
>
> He believes hes going to call him a racist and he
> wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up
> boy. You're in the real world now.
+1
Any lawyer would of told his stupid ass to stop posting until this is all resolved.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh is clueless, he thinks these proceedings are
> going to be like ffxu. Where he'll simply troll
> misery and try to undermine and attack his
> character and the jury are going to be like ffxu
> readers. People that dont care and will pile on
> with the same run of the mill type attacks.
>
> He believes hes going to call him a racist and he
> wins lol. This isnt ffxu and you better wise up
> boy. You're in the real world now.
+1
Any lawyer would of told his stupid ass to stop posting until this is all resolved.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uCTdN
()
Date: March 16, 2015 12:53PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence at trial.
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence at trial.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
@lizzie
()
Date: March 16, 2015 01:37PM
The best thing you could do with your life at this point is to continue working with the mentally challenged and/or the elderly. There is a desperate need for good caretakers and you'll feel good helping others. Who knows - maybe you could find the discipline to get a degree and move up the ladder. You're smart enough to do it.
The worst thing you could do is to continue hanging around people who revel in drama. That will only drag you down and bring out your worst instincts. You could surprise yourself if you put your mind to it.
The worst thing you could do is to continue hanging around people who revel in drama. That will only drag you down and bring out your worst instincts. You could surprise yourself if you put your mind to it.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The Wonderful World of Eesh
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:20PM
uCTdN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.
In his fantasy world, eesh thinks that he'll be able to ask Misery any stupid question that pops into his head when Misery's on the stand.
Of course, this is not how a trial actually works. You're limited to asking questions that are directly relevant to the matter at hand, which in this case is the damage done to the Misery family by eesh's tortious conduct.
Phil Leiser will object to eesh's irrelevant questions so many times that he'll sound like a broken Talky Tina doll that can only say "Objection".
The main question is whether eesh will shut up before the judge actually finds him in contempt.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.
In his fantasy world, eesh thinks that he'll be able to ask Misery any stupid question that pops into his head when Misery's on the stand.
Of course, this is not how a trial actually works. You're limited to asking questions that are directly relevant to the matter at hand, which in this case is the damage done to the Misery family by eesh's tortious conduct.
Phil Leiser will object to eesh's irrelevant questions so many times that he'll sound like a broken Talky Tina doll that can only say "Objection".
The main question is whether eesh will shut up before the judge actually finds him in contempt.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
^LOLLLL!!!
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:25PM
Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!! (The judge must be a family member of the Morenos or is that Eli!?)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
niggar
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:40PM
lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> > mistakes in the past, but I believe that she
> means
> > well and strives for a better world. She has a
> > lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> > everything works out well for her.
>
> Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to
> make me out to be such a horrible person all these
> years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.
>
> Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal
> things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person
> with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty
> much every time I've been arrested was because I
> wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had
> overcome my issues. With this most recent thing
> I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.
>
> Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger,
> worthless and useless to society but that shows
> how you people have no idea what I do in this
> community other than what you see me post here. No
> one ever talks about the time I risked my life and
> stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to
> help a family of geese cross the road. People were
> taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was
> great. You don't know I volunteer to help out
> homeless people and give them hope and actually
> just take the time out to sit and listen to them
> talk, acknowledge their existence, take their
> advice and try to learn from their mistakes.
>
> No one has ever seen a single post of someone I
> know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT
> GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because
> I am a totally different person offline than I am
> online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis
> as I was recently.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179334,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart
> and the patience to go help as a caregiver for
> adults with developmental disabilities and try to
> better myself and my life and learn some valuable
> skills for a future career.
>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179335,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179336,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179337,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They think all I do is sit here and troll all day
> and have and never will do anything with my life
> but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I
> have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up
> after being knocked down.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179341,filename=image.jpg>
>
> My trolls think they know me based on what I post
> here or some criminal record that I have never let
> stop me from trying in life but those in our
> community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad
> person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep
> the peace and make people smile.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179345,filename=image.jpg>
>
> I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach
> for my goals and live my dream of helping others.
> Make fun of me for living with my parents, so
> what? There are many people older than me living
> with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to
> make it out there or out there stealing from
> people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of
> me for working in fast food, it's better than
> still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting
> others for money and I am still going to school to
> learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family
> who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am
> truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they
> didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being
> a menace to society and robbing people, hurting
> them and actually being a "career criminal" to
> survive.
>
> Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about
> you than it does me to make fun of someone with
> obvious mental issues who actually has been trying
> and will continue to try to right my wrongs in
> life!
>
> You say I have no life and stay here all day and
> night well I sure think that's a lot better than
> having me out on the street committing crimes, now
> isn't it?!
>
> > Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread)
> is
> > everything in criminal proceedings, and I
> believe
> > lizzie will get out of her recent troubles
> because
> > her accuser is so discreditable.
>
> Even she knows that I make people happy. You
> rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and
> anyone who's near me without one either.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179346,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> People here have told me that I should "off
> myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so
> much life left to live and so much to live for.
> Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I
> always have a smile on my face no matter what's
> going on because I have hope and know that things
> always do get better!
>
> And people always trip out about how I always "get
> away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've
> done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't
> match my character at all and even the police know
> this. The things I've done are usually random and
> out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here
> as who I am but do the things you all post here
> match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This
> website is an outlet for me and I would hope most
> people here are NOT like the persona they portray
> here.
>
>
> Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have
> I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help
> those with special needs or worked with children?
> Have I made someone smile today? What does
> trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I
> really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person
> would I be as bold in person to say all the things
> I say to her to her face?
>
> I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and
> said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in
> my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma
> and deal with everything I've been handed in life
> but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.
Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by this?
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > lizzie is a good person. She may have made some
> > mistakes in the past, but I believe that she
> means
> > well and strives for a better world. She has a
> > lot to offer the world; I hope and pray that
> > everything works out well for her.
>
> Thanks eesh..even though it was you who tried to
> make me out to be such a horrible person all these
> years lol. I'm big enough to let that go.
>
> Sure, I've made mistakes and don't some illegal
> things but I'm not ashamed to admit I'm a person
> with issues and living with mental illness. Pretty
> much every time I've been arrested was because I
> wasn't taking care of myself and thinking I had
> overcome my issues. With this most recent thing
> I've learned that I haven't and am seeking help.
>
> Everyone wants to say I'm a criminal, a nigger,
> worthless and useless to society but that shows
> how you people have no idea what I do in this
> community other than what you see me post here. No
> one ever talks about the time I risked my life and
> stopped rush hour traffic on Jermantown Road to
> help a family of geese cross the road. People were
> taking videos, cheering and clapping, it was
> great. You don't know I volunteer to help out
> homeless people and give them hope and actually
> just take the time out to sit and listen to them
> talk, acknowledge their existence, take their
> advice and try to learn from their mistakes.
>
> No one has ever seen a single post of someone I
> know personally come here and say "OMG I KNOW THAT
> GIRL AND SHE DOES THIS THAT AND THAT" why? Because
> I am a totally different person offline than I am
> online, unless I'm suffering through my psychosis
> as I was recently.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179334,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They make fun of me for having compassion, a heart
> and the patience to go help as a caregiver for
> adults with developmental disabilities and try to
> better myself and my life and learn some valuable
> skills for a future career.
>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179335,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179336,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179337,filename=image.jpg>
>
> They think all I do is sit here and troll all day
> and have and never will do anything with my life
> but I have and will. Life has ups and downs and I
> have seen my fair share but I ALWAYS get back up
> after being knocked down.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179341,filename=image.jpg>
>
> My trolls think they know me based on what I post
> here or some criminal record that I have never let
> stop me from trying in life but those in our
> community who actually know me, know I'm not a bad
> person. I'm troubled but I do still try to keep
> the peace and make people smile.
>
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179345,filename=image.jpg>
>
> I'm going to continue to grow and learn and reach
> for my goals and live my dream of helping others.
> Make fun of me for living with my parents, so
> what? There are many people older than me living
> with theirs too - at least I'm not struggling to
> make it out there or out there stealing from
> people or robbing and hurting anyone. Make fun of
> me for working in fast food, it's better than
> still selling weed or again - robbing and hurting
> others for money and I am still going to school to
> learn more and I am SO thankful to have a family
> who loves me enough to put up with my shit. I am
> truly blessed and lucky. Where would I be if they
> didn't? Uh, probably out of the street truly being
> a menace to society and robbing people, hurting
> them and actually being a "career criminal" to
> survive.
>
> Troll me all you'd like, it says a lot more about
> you than it does me to make fun of someone with
> obvious mental issues who actually has been trying
> and will continue to try to right my wrongs in
> life!
>
> You say I have no life and stay here all day and
> night well I sure think that's a lot better than
> having me out on the street committing crimes, now
> isn't it?!
>
> > Credibility (as mentioned often in this thread)
> is
> > everything in criminal proceedings, and I
> believe
> > lizzie will get out of her recent troubles
> because
> > her accuser is so discreditable.
>
> Even she knows that I make people happy. You
> rarely ever see me without a smile on my face and
> anyone who's near me without one either.
>
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?2,file=179346,filename=image.jpg>
>
>
> People here have told me that I should "off
> myself" but I can't and won't. Sorry! I have so
> much life left to live and so much to live for.
> Life is precious and it's short enough as it is. I
> always have a smile on my face no matter what's
> going on because I have hope and know that things
> always do get better!
>
> And people always trip out about how I always "get
> away with crimes" I don't get away with shit. I've
> done my time. It's the fact that my crimes don't
> match my character at all and even the police know
> this. The things I've done are usually random and
> out of the ordinary. You may take what I post here
> as who I am but do the things you all post here
> match who you are? I surely hope not lol. This
> website is an outlet for me and I would hope most
> people here are NOT like the persona they portray
> here.
>
>
> Before you troll me again - ask yourself, have
> I ever gone out of my way to save animals, help
> those with special needs or worked with children?
> Have I made someone smile today? What does
> trolling lizzie really do for my self esteem? Am I
> really BETTER than her and if I saw her in person
> would I be as bold in person to say all the things
> I say to her to her face?
>
> I'm no angel and I'm not perfect. I've done and
> said some fucked up shit and have hurt people in
> my life but I am mature enough to accept my karma
> and deal with everything I've been handed in life
> but the universe ALWAYS balances everything out.
Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by this?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
typical nog mentality
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:42PM
> Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by this?
Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone else would be impressed by any of that.
Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone else would be impressed by any of that.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
niggar
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:47PM
typical nog mentality Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by
> this?
>
>
> Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone
> else would be impressed by any of that.
One should note that she fits in rather well with those special-ed tards.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 02:47PM by niggar.
-------------------------------------------------------
> > Is anyone here supposed to be impressed by
> this?
>
>
> Only a complete mongoloid nog would think someone
> else would be impressed by any of that.
One should note that she fits in rather well with those special-ed tards.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 02:47PM by niggar.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EpKjN
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:49PM
uCTdN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.
This is indeed quite likely, and a number of other issues the defendant and his allies have repeatedly harped on, indeed one might say "crapflooded" the board with (save for the fact that "love is blind," and Our Dear Leader, Cary, is clearly in love with his darling babyboi eesh, who could drench the board in an ocean of tedious, repetitive posts (as he has indeed done these past several months on the subject of "MrMisery's" perceived transgressions, which pale in comparison to "eesh's" various, well-documented campaigns of harassment, threats, and intimidation), and Cary would smile benignly, while two teaspoons from anyone else risks an angry thunderbolt from the FU battlements (in fairness, Cary's ever-varying definitions of "crapflooding," "troll," "garbage," etc, are consistent with the both the spirit and the letter of certain notable 19th-century precedents, q.v.), not to mention the terrifying scrutiny of the dreaded "ban radar" (a sturdy if slightly cumbersome device which Cary purchased from the Stasi after the fall of the Berlin Wall; about which it is reliably reported he once remarked, with a chuckle, "The best investment I ever made," while cheerfully scrubbing away the machine's decades-long accumulation of blood stains and splatters) (rumors that Cary is attempting to reconstruct the "peculiar apparatus" that plays a central role in Kafka's "In the Penal Colony" are unconfirmed at this time; as is the alleged apparatus-construction fund-raising campaign eesh is reportedly conducting (with, it is said, no small enthusiasm) among a "select group" of FU donors) similarly excluded.
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's entirely possible that his racial slurs in
> posts on this site won't be admissible in evidence
> at trial.
This is indeed quite likely, and a number of other issues the defendant and his allies have repeatedly harped on, indeed one might say "crapflooded" the board with (save for the fact that "love is blind," and Our Dear Leader, Cary, is clearly in love with his darling babyboi eesh, who could drench the board in an ocean of tedious, repetitive posts (as he has indeed done these past several months on the subject of "MrMisery's" perceived transgressions, which pale in comparison to "eesh's" various, well-documented campaigns of harassment, threats, and intimidation), and Cary would smile benignly, while two teaspoons from anyone else risks an angry thunderbolt from the FU battlements (in fairness, Cary's ever-varying definitions of "crapflooding," "troll," "garbage," etc, are consistent with the both the spirit and the letter of certain notable 19th-century precedents, q.v.), not to mention the terrifying scrutiny of the dreaded "ban radar" (a sturdy if slightly cumbersome device which Cary purchased from the Stasi after the fall of the Berlin Wall; about which it is reliably reported he once remarked, with a chuckle, "The best investment I ever made," while cheerfully scrubbing away the machine's decades-long accumulation of blood stains and splatters) (rumors that Cary is attempting to reconstruct the "peculiar apparatus" that plays a central role in Kafka's "In the Penal Colony" are unconfirmed at this time; as is the alleged apparatus-construction fund-raising campaign eesh is reportedly conducting (with, it is said, no small enthusiasm) among a "select group" of FU donors) similarly excluded.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dkxE9
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:52PM
^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!! (The
> judge must be a family member of the Morenos or is
> that Eli!?)
Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the judge that when he's responding to the objections.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!! (The
> judge must be a family member of the Morenos or is
> that Eli!?)
Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the judge that when he's responding to the objections.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
different case completely..
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:55PM
dkxE9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.
This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.
This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
different case completely..
()
Date: March 16, 2015 02:55PM
dkxE9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.
This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> (The
> > judge must be a family member of the Morenos or
> is
> > that Eli!?)
>
>
>
> Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was a
> racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell the
> judge that when he's responding to the objections.
This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery making racist posts has no relevance.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
6xEET
()
Date: March 16, 2015 03:05PM
different case completely.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dkxE9 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> > (The
> > > judge must be a family member of the Morenos
> or
> > is
> > > that Eli!?)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was
> a
> > racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell
> the
> > judge that when he's responding to the
> objections.
>
>
> This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery
> making racist posts has no relevance.
Actually, my comment about Mark Furman was supposed to be a joke.
-------------------------------------------------------
> dkxE9 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^LOLLLL!!! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh - but but b-b-b-b-b-utt! no!!!!!!!!!!!
> > (The
> > > judge must be a family member of the Morenos
> or
> > is
> > > that Eli!?)
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey, they let the jury hear that Mark Furman was
> a
> > racist in the OJ trial. Maybe Eesh can tell
> the
> > judge that when he's responding to the
> objections.
>
>
> This isn't a travyon vs zimmerman case, Misery
> making racist posts has no relevance.
Actually, my comment about Mark Furman was supposed to be a joke.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megan Mentions
()
Date: March 16, 2015 03:56PM
I haven't seen any mentions of Megan in a few days actually, until you brought her up.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:08PM
Megan Mentions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I haven't seen any mentions of Megan in a few days
> actually, until you brought her up.
+1
That's just an example of a troll attempting to stir the pot again. Megan has been left alone for the most part, we had some banter the other day but it seems she is finally learning and doing well in not responding to these backhand attacks. Hopefully she keeps it up. The best thing anyone can do is to just forget about her as she wishes.
Edition: I believe lizzie went after Megan after finding out Megan called Papa John's to alert them of the Papa John's thread in the hopes of having lizzie sued for defamation and somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 04:39PM by Nostradamus.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I haven't seen any mentions of Megan in a few days
> actually, until you brought her up.
+1
That's just an example of a troll attempting to stir the pot again. Megan has been left alone for the most part, we had some banter the other day but it seems she is finally learning and doing well in not responding to these backhand attacks. Hopefully she keeps it up. The best thing anyone can do is to just forget about her as she wishes.
Edition: I believe lizzie went after Megan after finding out Megan called Papa John's to alert them of the Papa John's thread in the hopes of having lizzie sued for defamation and somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2015 04:39PM by Nostradamus.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
7dVDW
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:23PM
Nostradamus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.
this makes no sense how or why would the website be shut down because of that? and why would anyone want it shut down?
-------------------------------------------------------
>somehow Cary responsible and sued and the website be shutdown.
this makes no sense how or why would the website be shut down because of that? and why would anyone want it shut down?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:31PM
I don't know and no one should hurt their brains trying to figure out how Megan thought that would be possible or was even a good idea because it resulted in a boss losing his job. Those are only questions Megan can answer and I advise her not to anymore. It's pointless at this point and what's done is done.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
please die
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:37PM
can you ALL please stfu about her? this thread isn't about Megan
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
how to argue like a child
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:51PM
please die Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> can you ALL please stfu about her? this thread
> isn't about Megan
Things this thread is not about:
1) lizzie
2) betterthanyoubitch
3) Megan Toohey
Because people on FFXU argue like fucking children and consequently hijack threads to talk about what THEY want to talk about rather than sticking to the topic at hand, all of these non-relevant people have been introduced into this thread.
-------------------------------------------------------
> can you ALL please stfu about her? this thread
> isn't about Megan
Things this thread is not about:
1) lizzie
2) betterthanyoubitch
3) Megan Toohey
Because people on FFXU argue like fucking children and consequently hijack threads to talk about what THEY want to talk about rather than sticking to the topic at hand, all of these non-relevant people have been introduced into this thread.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EPHpm
()
Date: March 16, 2015 04:53PM
Lizzy was mentioned in the original post by the OP several times.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: March 16, 2015 05:09PM
Okay so let's discuss the topic at hand then. No more mentioning lizzie, Megan and whoever that smooth ass is:
Discuss!
Discuss!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
embarrassing
()
Date: March 16, 2015 06:08PM
7dVDW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
and why would anyone want it shut down?
have you seen the 59 page thread on Megan?
-------------------------------------------------------
and why would anyone want it shut down?
have you seen the 59 page thread on Megan?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ivan_Semyonovitch_Akinfov
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:01PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
A MALEFACTOR
by Anton Chekhov
AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air of moroseness. He is barefooted.
"Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch Akinfov, going along the line in the morning, found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! . . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was that so?"
"Wha-at?"
"Was this all as Akinfov states?"
"To be sure, it was."
"Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut for?"
"Wha-at?"
"Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what were you unscrewing the nut for?"
"If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.
"What did you want that nut for?"
"The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for our lines."
"Who is 'we'?"
"We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that is."
"Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here about weights!"
"I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But can you do without a weight, your honour? If you put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That fish likes plenty of room."
"Why are you telling me about shillispers?"
"Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest little boy would not try to catch a fish without a weight. Of course anyone who did not understand might go to fish without a weight. There is no rule for a fool."
"So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a weight for your fishing line out of it?"
"What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones with!"
"But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a nail of some sort. . . ."
"You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and there's a hole in it."
"He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not noticed it the train might have run off the rails, people would have been killed -- you would have killed people."
"God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God, good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save, and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What are you saying?"
"And what do you suppose railway accidents do come from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an accident."
Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the magistrate incredulously.
"Why! how many years have we all in the village been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log across the line, say, then maybe it might have upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"
"But you must understand that the nut holds the rail fast to the sleepers!"
"We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."
Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over his mouth.
"Last year the train went off the rails here," says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"
"What do you say, your honour?"
"I am telling you that now I see why the train went off the rails last year. . . . I understand!"
"That's what you are educated people for, to understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant like ourselves, with no understanding at all, catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . . . You should reason first and then haul me off. It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit. . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."
"When your hut was searched they found another nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and when?"
"You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"
"I don't know where it was lying, only it was found. When did you unscrew it?"
"I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which was under the box, but the one which was in the sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed together."
"What Mitrofan?"
"Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him? He makes nets in our village and sells them to the gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a matter of ten for each net."
"Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down that every wilful damage of the railway line committed when it can expose the traffic on that line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is liable to penal servitude."
"Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant people. . . . What do we understand?"
"You understand all about it! You are lying, shamming!"
"What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon, yet even that won't bite without a weight."
"You'd better tell me about the shillisper next," said the magistrate, smiling.
"There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We cast our line without a weight on the top of the water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught that way, though that is not often."
"Come, hold your tongue."
A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to the other, looks at the table with the green cloth on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though what was before him was not the cloth but the sun. The magistrate writes rapidly.
"Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.
"No. I must take you under guard and send you to prison."
Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.
"How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . . ."
"Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."
"To prison. . . . If there was something to go for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for? I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . . . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen, the elder, you know."
"Hold your tongue."
I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis; "but that the elder has lied over the account, I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."
"You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries the magistrate, "take him away!"
"There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis, as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his -- or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog with conscience."
-------------------------------------------------------
> He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> African-Americans, Jewish people, and Hispanics.
>
>
> I wonder how many minorities will be on the jury?
A MALEFACTOR
by Anton Chekhov
AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air of moroseness. He is barefooted.
"Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch Akinfov, going along the line in the morning, found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! . . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was that so?"
"Wha-at?"
"Was this all as Akinfov states?"
"To be sure, it was."
"Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut for?"
"Wha-at?"
"Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what were you unscrewing the nut for?"
"If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.
"What did you want that nut for?"
"The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for our lines."
"Who is 'we'?"
"We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that is."
"Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here about weights!"
"I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But can you do without a weight, your honour? If you put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That fish likes plenty of room."
"Why are you telling me about shillispers?"
"Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest little boy would not try to catch a fish without a weight. Of course anyone who did not understand might go to fish without a weight. There is no rule for a fool."
"So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a weight for your fishing line out of it?"
"What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones with!"
"But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a nail of some sort. . . ."
"You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and there's a hole in it."
"He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not noticed it the train might have run off the rails, people would have been killed -- you would have killed people."
"God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God, good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save, and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What are you saying?"
"And what do you suppose railway accidents do come from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an accident."
Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the magistrate incredulously.
"Why! how many years have we all in the village been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log across the line, say, then maybe it might have upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"
"But you must understand that the nut holds the rail fast to the sleepers!"
"We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."
Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over his mouth.
"Last year the train went off the rails here," says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"
"What do you say, your honour?"
"I am telling you that now I see why the train went off the rails last year. . . . I understand!"
"That's what you are educated people for, to understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant like ourselves, with no understanding at all, catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . . . You should reason first and then haul me off. It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit. . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."
"When your hut was searched they found another nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and when?"
"You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"
"I don't know where it was lying, only it was found. When did you unscrew it?"
"I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which was under the box, but the one which was in the sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed together."
"What Mitrofan?"
"Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him? He makes nets in our village and sells them to the gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a matter of ten for each net."
"Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down that every wilful damage of the railway line committed when it can expose the traffic on that line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is liable to penal servitude."
"Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant people. . . . What do we understand?"
"You understand all about it! You are lying, shamming!"
"What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon, yet even that won't bite without a weight."
"You'd better tell me about the shillisper next," said the magistrate, smiling.
"There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We cast our line without a weight on the top of the water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught that way, though that is not often."
"Come, hold your tongue."
A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to the other, looks at the table with the green cloth on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though what was before him was not the cloth but the sun. The magistrate writes rapidly.
"Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.
"No. I must take you under guard and send you to prison."
Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.
"How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . . ."
"Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."
"To prison. . . . If there was something to go for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for? I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . . . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen, the elder, you know."
"Hold your tongue."
I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis; "but that the elder has lied over the account, I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."
"You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries the magistrate, "take him away!"
"There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis, as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his -- or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog with conscience."
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
%Bewildered%
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:05PM
WTH?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tl;dr
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:06PM
Ivan_Semyonovitch_Akinfov Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> A MALEFACTOR
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped
> hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing
> the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown
> with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes
> scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows
> have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his
> head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt
> hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air
> of moroseness. He is barefooted.
>
> "Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come
> nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of
> this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch
> Akinfov, going along the line in the morning,
> found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile
> engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are
> made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! .
> . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was
> that so?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Was this all as Akinfov states?"
>
> "To be sure, it was."
>
> "Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut
> for?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what
> were you unscrewing the nut for?"
>
> "If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed
> it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.
>
> "What did you want that nut for?"
>
> "The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for
> our lines."
>
> "Who is 'we'?"
>
> "We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that
> is."
>
> "Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but
> speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here
> about weights!"
>
> "I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm
> telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But
> can you do without a weight, your honour? If you
> put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to
> the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling
> lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the
> use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The
> perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to
> the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only
> taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and
> there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That
> fish likes plenty of room."
>
> "Why are you telling me about shillispers?"
>
> "Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry
> catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest
> little boy would not try to catch a fish without a
> weight. Of course anyone who did not understand
> might go to fish without a weight. There is no
> rule for a fool."
>
> "So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a
> weight for your fishing line out of it?"
>
> "What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones
> with!"
>
> "But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a
> nail of some sort. . . ."
>
> "You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to
> buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find
> anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and
> there's a hole in it."
>
> "He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd
> been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't
> you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing
> these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not
> noticed it the train might have run off the rails,
> people would have been killed -- you would have
> killed people."
>
> "God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them
> for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God,
> good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives
> without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save,
> and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What
> are you saying?"
>
> "And what do you suppose railway accidents do come
> from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an
> accident."
>
> Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the
> magistrate incredulously.
>
> "Why! how many years have we all in the village
> been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been
> merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing
> people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log
> across the line, say, then maybe it might have
> upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"
>
> "But you must understand that the nut holds the
> rail fast to the sleepers!"
>
> "We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them
> all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it
> thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."
>
> Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over
> his mouth.
>
> "Last year the train went off the rails here,"
> says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"
>
> "What do you say, your honour?"
>
> "I am telling you that now I see why the train
> went off the rails last year. . . . I
> understand!"
>
> "That's what you are educated people for, to
> understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to
> whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have
> reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant
> like ourselves, with no understanding at all,
> catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . .
> . You should reason first and then haul me off.
> It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit.
> . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me
> twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."
>
> "When your hut was searched they found another
> nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and
> when?"
>
> "You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"
>
> "I don't know where it was lying, only it was
> found. When did you unscrew it?"
>
> "I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of
> one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which
> was under the box, but the one which was in the
> sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed
> together."
>
> "What Mitrofan?"
>
> "Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him?
> He makes nets in our village and sells them to the
> gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a
> matter of ten for each net."
>
> "Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down
> that every wilful damage of the railway line
> committed when it can expose the traffic on that
> line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an
> accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you
> understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing
> what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is
> liable to penal servitude."
>
> "Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant
> people. . . . What do we understand?"
>
> "You understand all about it! You are lying,
> shamming!"
>
> "What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you
> don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a
> weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon,
> yet even that won't bite without a weight."
>
> "You'd better tell me about the shillisper next,"
> said the magistrate, smiling.
>
> "There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We
> cast our line without a weight on the top of the
> water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught
> that way, though that is not often."
>
> "Come, hold your tongue."
>
> A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to
> the other, looks at the table with the green cloth
> on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though
> what was before him was not the cloth but the sun.
> The magistrate writes rapidly.
>
> "Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.
>
> "No. I must take you under guard and send you to
> prison."
>
> Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick
> eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.
>
> "How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have
> no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must
> get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . .
> ."
>
> "Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."
>
> "To prison. . . . If there was something to go
> for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for?
> I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not
> been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the
> arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . .
> . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen,
> the elder, you know."
>
> "Hold your tongue."
>
> I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis;
> "but that the elder has lied over the account,
> I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of
> us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor
> Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."
>
> "You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries
> the magistrate, "take him away!"
>
> "There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis,
> as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out
> of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a
> brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must
> answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the
> general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his --
> or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought
> to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if
> you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog
> with conscience."
tl;dr
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He has used racial slurs to describe Asians,
> > African-Americans, Jewish people, and
> Hispanics.
> >
> >
> > I wonder how many minorities will be on the
> jury?
>
>
> A MALEFACTOR
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> AN exceedingly lean little peasant, in a striped
> hempen shirt and patched drawers, stands facing
> the investigating magistrate. His face overgrown
> with hair and pitted with smallpox, and his eyes
> scarcely visible under thick, overhanging eyebrows
> have an expression of sullen moroseness. On his
> head there is a perfect mop of tangled, unkempt
> hair, which gives him an even more spider-like air
> of moroseness. He is barefooted.
>
> "Denis Grigoryev!" the magistrate begins. "Come
> nearer, and answer my questions. On the seventh of
> this July the railway watchman, Ivan Semyonovitch
> Akinfov, going along the line in the morning,
> found you at the hundred-and-forty-first mile
> engaged in unscrewing a nut by which the rails are
> made fast to the sleepers. Here it is, the nut! .
> . . With the aforesaid nut he detained you. Was
> that so?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Was this all as Akinfov states?"
>
> "To be sure, it was."
>
> "Very good; well, what were you unscrewing the nut
> for?"
>
> "Wha-at?"
>
> "Drop that 'wha-at' and answer the question; what
> were you unscrewing the nut for?"
>
> "If I hadn't wanted it I shouldn't have unscrewed
> it," croaks Denis, looking at the ceiling.
>
> "What did you want that nut for?"
>
> "The nut? We make weights out of those nuts for
> our lines."
>
> "Who is 'we'?"
>
> "We, people. . . . The Klimovo peasants, that
> is."
>
> "Listen, my man; don't play the idiot to me, but
> speak sensibly. It's no use telling lies here
> about weights!"
>
> "I've never been a liar from a child, and now I'm
> telling lies . . ." mutters Denis, blinking. "But
> can you do without a weight, your honour? If you
> put live bait or maggots on a hook, would it go to
> the bottom without a weight? . . . I am telling
> lies," grins Denis. . . . "What the devil is the
> use of the worm if it swims on the surface! The
> perch and the pike and the eel-pout always go to
> the bottom, and a bait on the surface is only
> taken by a shillisper, not very often then, and
> there are no shillispers in our river. . . . That
> fish likes plenty of room."
>
> "Why are you telling me about shillispers?"
>
> "Wha-at? Why, you asked me yourself! The gentry
> catch fish that way too in our parts. The silliest
> little boy would not try to catch a fish without a
> weight. Of course anyone who did not understand
> might go to fish without a weight. There is no
> rule for a fool."
>
> "So you say you unscrewed this nut to make a
> weight for your fishing line out of it?"
>
> "What else for? It wasn't to play knuckle-bones
> with!"
>
> "But you might have taken lead, a bullet . . . a
> nail of some sort. . . ."
>
> "You don't pick up lead in the road, you have to
> buy it, and a nail's no good. You can't find
> anything better than a nut. . . . It's heavy, and
> there's a hole in it."
>
> "He keeps pretending to be a fool! as though he'd
> been born yesterday or dropped from heaven! Don't
> you understand, you blockhead, what unscrewing
> these nuts leads to? If the watchman had not
> noticed it the train might have run off the rails,
> people would have been killed -- you would have
> killed people."
>
> "God forbid, your honour! What should I kill them
> for? Are we heathens or wicked people? Thank God,
> good gentlemen, we have lived all our lives
> without ever dreaming of such a thing. . . . Save,
> and have mercy on us, Queen of Heaven! . . . What
> are you saying?"
>
> "And what do you suppose railway accidents do come
> from? Unscrew two or three nuts and you have an
> accident."
>
> Denis grins, and screws up his eye at the
> magistrate incredulously.
>
> "Why! how many years have we all in the village
> been unscrewing nuts, and the Lord has been
> merciful; and you talk of accidents, killing
> people. If I had carried away a rail or put a log
> across the line, say, then maybe it might have
> upset the train, but. . . pouf! a nut!"
>
> "But you must understand that the nut holds the
> rail fast to the sleepers!"
>
> "We understand that. . . . We don't unscrew them
> all . . . we leave some. . . . We don't do it
> thoughtlessly . . . we understand. . . ."
>
> Denis yawns and makes the sign of the cross over
> his mouth.
>
> "Last year the train went off the rails here,"
> says the magistrate. "Now I see why!"
>
> "What do you say, your honour?"
>
> "I am telling you that now I see why the train
> went off the rails last year. . . . I
> understand!"
>
> "That's what you are educated people for, to
> understand, you kind gentlemen. The Lord knows to
> whom to give understanding. . . . Here you have
> reasoned how and what, but the watchman, a peasant
> like ourselves, with no understanding at all,
> catches one by the collar and hauls one along. . .
> . You should reason first and then haul me off.
> It's a saying that a peasant has a peasant's wit.
> . . . Write down, too, your honour, that he hit me
> twice -- in the jaw and in the chest."
>
> "When your hut was searched they found another
> nut. . . . At what spot did you unscrew that, and
> when?"
>
> "You mean the nut which lay under the red box?"
>
> "I don't know where it was lying, only it was
> found. When did you unscrew it?"
>
> "I didn't unscrew it; Ignashka, the son of
> one-eyed Semyon, gave it me. I mean the one which
> was under the box, but the one which was in the
> sledge in the yard Mitrofan and I unscrewed
> together."
>
> "What Mitrofan?"
>
> "Mitrofan Petrov. . . . Haven't you heard of him?
> He makes nets in our village and sells them to the
> gentry. He needs a lot of those nuts. Reckon a
> matter of ten for each net."
>
> "Listen. Article 1081 of the Penal Code lays down
> that every wilful damage of the railway line
> committed when it can expose the traffic on that
> line to danger, and the guilty party knows that an
> accident must be caused by it . . . (Do you
> understand? Knows! And you could not help knowing
> what this unscrewing would lead to . . .) is
> liable to penal servitude."
>
> "Of course, you know best. . . . We are ignorant
> people. . . . What do we understand?"
>
> "You understand all about it! You are lying,
> shamming!"
>
> "What should I lie for? Ask in the village if you
> don't believe me. Only a bleak is caught without a
> weight, and there is no fish worse than a gudgeon,
> yet even that won't bite without a weight."
>
> "You'd better tell me about the shillisper next,"
> said the magistrate, smiling.
>
> "There are no shillispers in our parts. . . . We
> cast our line without a weight on the top of the
> water with a butterfly; a mullet may be caught
> that way, though that is not often."
>
> "Come, hold your tongue."
>
> A silence follows. Denis shifts from one foot to
> the other, looks at the table with the green cloth
> on it, and blinks his eyes violently as though
> what was before him was not the cloth but the sun.
> The magistrate writes rapidly.
>
> "Can I go?" asks Denis after a long silence.
>
> "No. I must take you under guard and send you to
> prison."
>
> Denis leaves off blinking and, raising his thick
> eyebrows, looks inquiringly at the magistrate.
>
> "How do you mean, to prison? Your honour! I have
> no time to spare, I must go to the fair; I must
> get three roubles from Yegor for some tallow! . .
> ."
>
> "Hold your tongue; don't interrupt."
>
> "To prison. . . . If there was something to go
> for, I'd go; but just to go for nothing! What for?
> I haven't stolen anything, I believe, and I've not
> been fighting. . . . If you are in doubt about the
> arrears, your honour, don't believe the elder. . .
> . You ask the agent . . . he's a regular heathen,
> the elder, you know."
>
> "Hold your tongue."
>
> I am holding my tongue, as it is," mutters Denis;
> "but that the elder has lied over the account,
> I'll take my oath for it. . . . There are three of
> us brothers: Kuzma Grigoryev, then Yegor
> Grigoryev, and me, Denis Grigoryev."
>
> "You are hindering me. . . . Hey, Semyon," cries
> the magistrate, "take him away!"
>
> "There are three of us brothers," mutters Denis,
> as two stalwart soldiers take him and lead him out
> of the room. "A brother is not responsible for a
> brother. Kuzma does not pay, so you, Denis, must
> answer for it. . . . Judges indeed! Our master the
> general is dead -- the Kingdom of Heaven be his --
> or he would have shown you judges. . . . You ought
> to judge sensibly, not at random. . . . Flog if
> you like, but flog someone who deserves it, flog
> with conscience."
tl;dr
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
SpeakingtoYourMind
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:10PM
So you're trying to write some kind of analogy? Nobody can read you mind. Just speak plainly. If not, there are plenty of therapists around.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dmiztritch&Brizzhcarylov
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:33PM
THE DEATH OF A GOVERNMENT CLERK
by Anton Chekhov
ONE fine evening, a no less fine government clerk called Ivan Dmitritch Tchervyakov was sitting in the second row of the stalls, gazing through an opera glass at the Cloches de Corneville. He gazed and felt at the acme of bliss. But suddenly. . . . In stories one so often meets with this "But suddenly." The authors are right: life is so full of surprises! But suddenly his face puckered up, his eyes disappeared, his breathing was arrested . . . he took the opera glass from his eyes, bent over and . . . "Aptchee!!" he sneezed as you perceive. It is not reprehensible for anyone to sneeze anywhere. Peasants sneeze and so do police superintendents, and sometimes even privy councillors. All men sneeze. Tchervyakov was not in the least confused, he wiped his face with his handkerchief, and like a polite man, looked round to see whether he had disturbed any one by his sneezing. But then he was overcome with confusion. He saw that an old gentleman sitting in front of him in the first row of the stalls was carefully wiping his bald head and his neck with his glove and muttering something to himself. In the old gentleman, Tchervyakov recognised Brizzhalov, a civilian general serving in the Department of Transport.
"I have spattered him," thought Tchervyakov, "he is not the head of my department, but still it is awkward. I must apologise."
Tchervyakov gave a cough, bent his whole person forward, and whispered in the general's ear.
"Pardon, your Excellency, I spattered you accidentally. . . ."
"Never mind, never mind."
"For goodness sake excuse me, I . . . I did not mean to."
"Oh, please, sit down! let me listen!"
Tchervyakov was embarrassed, he smiled stupidly and fell to gazing at the stage. He gazed at it but was no longer feeling bliss. He began to be troubled by uneasiness. In the interval, he went up to Brizzhalov, walked beside him, and overcoming his shyness, muttered:
"I spattered you, your Excellency, forgive me . . . you see . . . I didn't do it to . . . ."
"Oh, that's enough . . . I'd forgotten it, and you keep on about it!" said the general, moving his lower lip impatiently.
"He has forgotten, but there is a fiendish light in his eye," thought Tchervyakov, looking suspiciously at the general. "And he doesn't want to talk. I ought to explain to him . . . that I really didn't intend . . . that it is the law of nature or else he will think I meant to spit on him. He doesn't think so now, but he will think so later!"
On getting home, Tchervyakov told his wife of his breach of good manners. It struck him that his wife took too frivolous a view of the incident; she was a little frightened, but when she learned that Brizzhalov was in a different department, she was reassured.
"Still, you had better go and apologise," she said, "or he will think you don't know how to behave in public."
"That's just it! I did apologise, but he took it somehow queerly . . . he didn't say a word of sense. There wasn't time to talk properly."
Next day Tchervyakov put on a new uniform, had his hair cut and went to Brizzhalov's to explain; going into the general's reception room he saw there a number of petitioners and among them the general himself, who was beginning to interview them. After questioning several petitioners the general raised his eyes and looked at Tchervyakov.
"Yesterday at the Arcadia, if you recollect, your Excellency," the latter began, "I sneezed and . . . accidentally spattered . . . Exc. . . ."
"What nonsense. . . . It's beyond anything! What can I do for you," said the general addressing the next petitioner.
"He won't speak," thought Tchervyakov, turning pale; "that means that he is angry. . . . No, it can't be left like this. . . . I will explain to him."
When the general had finished his conversation with the last of the petitioners and was turning towards his inner apartments, Tchervyakov took a step towards him and muttered:
"Your Excellency! If I venture to trouble your Excellency, it is simply from a feeling I may say of regret! . . . It was not intentional if you will graciously believe me."
The general made a lachrymose face, and waved his hand.
"Why, you are simply making fun of me, sir," he said as he closed the door behind him.
"Where's the making fun in it?" thought Tchervyakov, "there is nothing of the sort! He is a general, but he can't understand. If that is how it is I am not going to apologise to that fanfaron any more! The devil take him. I'll write a letter to him, but I won't go. By Jove, I won't."
So thought Tchervyakov as he walked home; he did not write a letter to the general, he pondered and pondered and could not make up that letter. He had to go next day to explain in person.
"I ventured to disturb your Excellency yesterday," he muttered, when the general lifted enquiring eyes upon him, "not to make fun as you were pleased to say. I was apologising for having spattered you in sneezing. . . . And I did not dream of making fun of you. Should I dare to make fun of you, if we should take to making fun, then there would be no respect for persons, there would be. . . ."
"Be off!" yelled the general, turning suddenly purple, and shaking all over.
"What?" asked Tchervyakov, in a whisper turning numb with horror.
"Be off!" repeated the general, stamping.
Something seemed to give way in Tchervyakov's stomach. Seeing nothing and hearing nothing he reeled to the door, went out into the street, and went staggering along. . . . Reaching home mechanically, without taking off his uniform, he lay down on the sofa and died.
/
Attachments:
by Anton Chekhov
ONE fine evening, a no less fine government clerk called Ivan Dmitritch Tchervyakov was sitting in the second row of the stalls, gazing through an opera glass at the Cloches de Corneville. He gazed and felt at the acme of bliss. But suddenly. . . . In stories one so often meets with this "But suddenly." The authors are right: life is so full of surprises! But suddenly his face puckered up, his eyes disappeared, his breathing was arrested . . . he took the opera glass from his eyes, bent over and . . . "Aptchee!!" he sneezed as you perceive. It is not reprehensible for anyone to sneeze anywhere. Peasants sneeze and so do police superintendents, and sometimes even privy councillors. All men sneeze. Tchervyakov was not in the least confused, he wiped his face with his handkerchief, and like a polite man, looked round to see whether he had disturbed any one by his sneezing. But then he was overcome with confusion. He saw that an old gentleman sitting in front of him in the first row of the stalls was carefully wiping his bald head and his neck with his glove and muttering something to himself. In the old gentleman, Tchervyakov recognised Brizzhalov, a civilian general serving in the Department of Transport.
"I have spattered him," thought Tchervyakov, "he is not the head of my department, but still it is awkward. I must apologise."
Tchervyakov gave a cough, bent his whole person forward, and whispered in the general's ear.
"Pardon, your Excellency, I spattered you accidentally. . . ."
"Never mind, never mind."
"For goodness sake excuse me, I . . . I did not mean to."
"Oh, please, sit down! let me listen!"
Tchervyakov was embarrassed, he smiled stupidly and fell to gazing at the stage. He gazed at it but was no longer feeling bliss. He began to be troubled by uneasiness. In the interval, he went up to Brizzhalov, walked beside him, and overcoming his shyness, muttered:
"I spattered you, your Excellency, forgive me . . . you see . . . I didn't do it to . . . ."
"Oh, that's enough . . . I'd forgotten it, and you keep on about it!" said the general, moving his lower lip impatiently.
"He has forgotten, but there is a fiendish light in his eye," thought Tchervyakov, looking suspiciously at the general. "And he doesn't want to talk. I ought to explain to him . . . that I really didn't intend . . . that it is the law of nature or else he will think I meant to spit on him. He doesn't think so now, but he will think so later!"
On getting home, Tchervyakov told his wife of his breach of good manners. It struck him that his wife took too frivolous a view of the incident; she was a little frightened, but when she learned that Brizzhalov was in a different department, she was reassured.
"Still, you had better go and apologise," she said, "or he will think you don't know how to behave in public."
"That's just it! I did apologise, but he took it somehow queerly . . . he didn't say a word of sense. There wasn't time to talk properly."
Next day Tchervyakov put on a new uniform, had his hair cut and went to Brizzhalov's to explain; going into the general's reception room he saw there a number of petitioners and among them the general himself, who was beginning to interview them. After questioning several petitioners the general raised his eyes and looked at Tchervyakov.
"Yesterday at the Arcadia, if you recollect, your Excellency," the latter began, "I sneezed and . . . accidentally spattered . . . Exc. . . ."
"What nonsense. . . . It's beyond anything! What can I do for you," said the general addressing the next petitioner.
"He won't speak," thought Tchervyakov, turning pale; "that means that he is angry. . . . No, it can't be left like this. . . . I will explain to him."
When the general had finished his conversation with the last of the petitioners and was turning towards his inner apartments, Tchervyakov took a step towards him and muttered:
"Your Excellency! If I venture to trouble your Excellency, it is simply from a feeling I may say of regret! . . . It was not intentional if you will graciously believe me."
The general made a lachrymose face, and waved his hand.
"Why, you are simply making fun of me, sir," he said as he closed the door behind him.
"Where's the making fun in it?" thought Tchervyakov, "there is nothing of the sort! He is a general, but he can't understand. If that is how it is I am not going to apologise to that fanfaron any more! The devil take him. I'll write a letter to him, but I won't go. By Jove, I won't."
So thought Tchervyakov as he walked home; he did not write a letter to the general, he pondered and pondered and could not make up that letter. He had to go next day to explain in person.
"I ventured to disturb your Excellency yesterday," he muttered, when the general lifted enquiring eyes upon him, "not to make fun as you were pleased to say. I was apologising for having spattered you in sneezing. . . . And I did not dream of making fun of you. Should I dare to make fun of you, if we should take to making fun, then there would be no respect for persons, there would be. . . ."
"Be off!" yelled the general, turning suddenly purple, and shaking all over.
"What?" asked Tchervyakov, in a whisper turning numb with horror.
"Be off!" repeated the general, stamping.
Something seemed to give way in Tchervyakov's stomach. Seeing nothing and hearing nothing he reeled to the door, went out into the street, and went staggering along. . . . Reaching home mechanically, without taking off his uniform, he lay down on the sofa and died.
/
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Plan B
()
Date: March 16, 2015 07:36PM
It appears the Cray Cray thread has died and the slack is being picked up here.
I predict it wont be long before Megan makes an appearence. She's probably following the Cray Cray thread and wondering to herself...."Why is nobody talking about me?"
I predict it wont be long before Megan makes an appearence. She's probably following the Cray Cray thread and wondering to herself...."Why is nobody talking about me?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
"Of public interest.Therefore.."
()
Date: March 16, 2015 08:03PM
A SLANDER
by Anton Chekhov
SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was marrying his daughter to the teacher of history and geography. The wedding festivities were going off most successfully. In the drawing room there was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired from the club were flitting distractedly about the rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa, the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and interrupting one another as they described to the guests cases of persons being buried alive, and gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that there were many things in this world which would always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable. Persons whose social position precluded them from entering were looking in at the windows from the yard.
Just at midnight the master of the house went into the kitchen to see whether everything was ready for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and many other odours. On two tables the accessories, the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt around it, was bustling about the tables.
"Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev, rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come, show me the sturgeon."
Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After standing a moment he snapped his fingers with delight and once more smacked his lips.
"Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?" came a voice from the next room, and in the doorway there appeared the cropped head of the assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . . Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with the fair sex--tette!"
"I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of the fish."
"Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face vanished, wearing a broad grin.
Ahineev flushed.
"Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town, the brute."
Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was standing by the piano, and, bending down with a jaunty air, was whispering something to the inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.
"Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me, blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it! She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass . . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."
Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.
"I've just been in the kitchen to see after the supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow, beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha, ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. . . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon . . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes. I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said: . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!' Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine, silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like all the beasts put together, and he talks about kissing! Queer fish!"
"Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming up.
"Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the kitchen . . ."
And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa, if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and saw behind him Mzda.
"We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish, he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"
"Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.
"Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know, looking at the sturgeon. . . ."
And so on. Within half an hour or so all the guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and Vankin.
"Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about it!' "
And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he drank four glasses too many. After escorting the young people to their room, he went to bed and slept like an innocent babe, and next day he thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon. But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson -- when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head master went up to him and drew him aside:
"Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my business; but all the same I must make you realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are rumors that you are romancing with that . . . cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . . flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you! Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."
Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it seemed to him that the whole town was looking at him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home fresh trouble awaited him.
"Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?" his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan! Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you savage!"
And she slapped him in the face. He got up from the table, not feeling the earth under his feet, and without his hat or coat, made his way to Vankin. He found him at home.
"You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you covered me with mud before all the town? Why did you set this slander going about me?"
"What slander? What are you talking about?"
"Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you brigand?"
Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind and lay me out, if I said a single word about you! May I be left without house and home, may I be stricken with worse than cholera!"
Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was evidently not he who was the author of the slander.
"But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over all his acquaintances in his mind and beating himself on the breast. "Who, then?"
Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.
Attachments:
by Anton Chekhov
SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was marrying his daughter to the teacher of history and geography. The wedding festivities were going off most successfully. In the drawing room there was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired from the club were flitting distractedly about the rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa, the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and interrupting one another as they described to the guests cases of persons being buried alive, and gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that there were many things in this world which would always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable. Persons whose social position precluded them from entering were looking in at the windows from the yard.
Just at midnight the master of the house went into the kitchen to see whether everything was ready for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and many other odours. On two tables the accessories, the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt around it, was bustling about the tables.
"Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev, rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come, show me the sturgeon."
Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After standing a moment he snapped his fingers with delight and once more smacked his lips.
"Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?" came a voice from the next room, and in the doorway there appeared the cropped head of the assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . . Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with the fair sex--tette!"
"I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of the fish."
"Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face vanished, wearing a broad grin.
Ahineev flushed.
"Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town, the brute."
Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was standing by the piano, and, bending down with a jaunty air, was whispering something to the inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.
"Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me, blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it! She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass . . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."
Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.
"I've just been in the kitchen to see after the supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow, beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha, ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. . . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon . . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes. I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said: . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!' Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine, silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like all the beasts put together, and he talks about kissing! Queer fish!"
"Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming up.
"Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the kitchen . . ."
And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa, if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and saw behind him Mzda.
"We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish, he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"
"Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.
"Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know, looking at the sturgeon. . . ."
And so on. Within half an hour or so all the guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and Vankin.
"Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about it!' "
And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he drank four glasses too many. After escorting the young people to their room, he went to bed and slept like an innocent babe, and next day he thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon. But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson -- when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head master went up to him and drew him aside:
"Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my business; but all the same I must make you realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are rumors that you are romancing with that . . . cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . . flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you! Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."
Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it seemed to him that the whole town was looking at him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home fresh trouble awaited him.
"Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?" his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan! Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you savage!"
And she slapped him in the face. He got up from the table, not feeling the earth under his feet, and without his hat or coat, made his way to Vankin. He found him at home.
"You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you covered me with mud before all the town? Why did you set this slander going about me?"
"What slander? What are you talking about?"
"Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you brigand?"
Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind and lay me out, if I said a single word about you! May I be left without house and home, may I be stricken with worse than cholera!"
Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was evidently not he who was the author of the slander.
"But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over all his acquaintances in his mind and beating himself on the breast. "Who, then?"
Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eat some worms
()
Date: March 16, 2015 10:09PM
Well done Chekhov. " Trantulov" ...Indeed. Well done. Brava.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lit Fag Ruins Thread
()
Date: March 16, 2015 10:13PM
Thanks lit fag.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
from long ago
()
Date: March 16, 2015 10:52PM
DanoWells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me
she has balls on the end of her tits
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me
she has balls on the end of her tits
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
ADDerall
()
Date: March 16, 2015 11:01PM
This thread is evidence that adult ADHD isn't a myth
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
bbLhN
()
Date: March 17, 2015 12:56AM
"Of public interest.Therefore.." Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A SLANDER
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was
> marrying his daughter to the teacher of history
> and geography. The wedding festivities were going
> off most successfully. In the drawing room there
> was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired
> from the club were flitting distractedly about the
> rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty
> white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din
> of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa,
> the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French
> teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of
> taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and
> interrupting one another as they described to the
> guests cases of persons being buried alive, and
> gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them
> believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that
> there were many things in this world which would
> always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room
> the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to
> the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the
> right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you
> perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable.
> Persons whose social position precluded them from
> entering were looking in at the windows from the
> yard.
>
> Just at midnight the master of the house went into
> the kitchen to see whether everything was ready
> for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was
> filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and
> many other odours. On two tables the accessories,
> the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in
> artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced
> woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt
> around it, was bustling about the tables.
>
> "Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev,
> rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a
> perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come,
> show me the sturgeon."
>
> Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously
> lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the
> paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge
> sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with
> capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the
> sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned
> his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips
> emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After
> standing a moment he snapped his fingers with
> delight and once more smacked his lips.
>
> "Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who
> is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?"
> came a voice from the next room, and in the
> doorway there appeared the cropped head of the
> assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . .
> Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a
> fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with
> the fair sex--tette!"
>
> "I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who
> told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked
> my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an
> indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of
> the fish."
>
> "Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face
> vanished, wearing a broad grin.
>
> Ahineev flushed.
>
> "Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and
> talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town,
> the brute."
>
> Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and
> looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was
> standing by the piano, and, bending down with a
> jaunty air, was whispering something to the
> inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.
>
> "Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me,
> blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it!
> She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass .
> . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his
> being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and
> he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."
>
> Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome
> with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.
>
> "I've just been in the kitchen to see after the
> supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are
> fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow,
> beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha,
> ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. .
> . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon .
> . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen
> just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes.
> I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips
> with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at
> the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said:
> . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!'
> Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine,
> silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like
> all the beasts put together, and he talks about
> kissing! Queer fish!"
>
> "Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming
> up.
>
> "Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the
> kitchen . . ."
>
> And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused
> me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa,
> if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and
> saw behind him Mzda.
>
> "We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish,
> he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside
> Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly
> stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must
> have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a
> turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife
> of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"
>
> "Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught
> Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.
>
> "Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know,
> looking at the sturgeon. . . ."
>
> And so on. Within half an hour or so all the
> guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and
> Vankin.
>
> "Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing
> his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story
> and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your
> improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about
> it!' "
>
> And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he
> drank four glasses too many. After escorting the
> young people to their room, he went to bed and
> slept like an innocent babe, and next day he
> thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon.
> But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil
> tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy
> was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be
> precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson --
> when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the
> teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious
> propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head
> master went up to him and drew him aside:
>
> "Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head
> master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my
> business; but all the same I must make you
> realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are
> rumors that you are romancing with that . . .
> cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . .
> flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but
> don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you!
> Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."
>
> Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a
> man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man
> scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it
> seemed to him that the whole town was looking at
> him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home
> fresh trouble awaited him.
>
> "Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?"
> his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so
> pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining
> for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan!
> Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you
> savage!"
>
> And she slapped him in the face. He got up from
> the table, not feeling the earth under his feet,
> and without his hat or coat, made his way to
> Vankin. He found him at home.
>
> "You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you
> covered me with mud before all the town? Why did
> you set this slander going about me?"
>
> "What slander? What are you talking about?"
>
> "Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't
> it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you
> brigand?"
>
> Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his
> battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon
> and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind
> and lay me out, if I said a single word about you!
> May I be left without house and home, may I be
> stricken with worse than cholera!"
>
> Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was
> evidently not he who was the author of the
> slander.
>
> "But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over
> all his acquaintances in his mind and beating
> himself on the breast. "Who, then?"
>
> Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.
tl;dr
-------------------------------------------------------
> A SLANDER
>
> by Anton Chekhov
>
> SERGE KAPITONICH AHINEEV, the writing master, was
> marrying his daughter to the teacher of history
> and geography. The wedding festivities were going
> off most successfully. In the drawing room there
> was singing, playing, and dancing. Waiters hired
> from the club were flitting distractedly about the
> rooms, dressed in black swallow-tails and dirty
> white ties. There was a continual hubbub and din
> of conversation. Sitting side by side on the sofa,
> the teacher of mathematics, Tarantulov, the French
> teacher, Pasdequoi, and the junior assessor of
> taxes, Mzda, were talking hurriedly and
> interrupting one another as they described to the
> guests cases of persons being buried alive, and
> gave their opinions on spiritualism. None of them
> believed in spiritualism, but all admitted that
> there were many things in this world which would
> always be beyond the mind of man. In the next room
> the literature master, Dodonsky, was explaining to
> the visitors the cases in which a sentry has the
> right to fire on passers-by. The subjects, as you
> perceive, were alarming, but very agreeable.
> Persons whose social position precluded them from
> entering were looking in at the windows from the
> yard.
>
> Just at midnight the master of the house went into
> the kitchen to see whether everything was ready
> for supper. The kitchen from floor to ceiling was
> filled with fumes composed of goose, duck, and
> many other odours. On two tables the accessories,
> the drinks and light refreshments, were set out in
> artistic disorder. The cook, Marfa, a red-faced
> woman whose figure was like a barrel with a belt
> around it, was bustling about the tables.
>
> "Show me the sturgeon, Marfa," said Ahineev,
> rubbing his hands and licking his lips. "What a
> perfume! I could eat up the whole kitchen. Come,
> show me the sturgeon."
>
> Marfa went up to one of the benches and cautiously
> lifted a piece of greasy newspaper. Under the
> paper on an immense dish there reposed a huge
> sturgeon, masked in jelly and decorated with
> capers, olives, and carrots. Ahineev gazed at the
> sturgeon and gasped. His face beamed, he turned
> his eyes up. He bent down and with his lips
> emitted the sound of an ungreased wheel. After
> standing a moment he snapped his fingers with
> delight and once more smacked his lips.
>
> "Ah-ah! the sound of a passionate kiss. . . . Who
> is it you're kissing out there, little Marfa?"
> came a voice from the next room, and in the
> doorway there appeared the cropped head of the
> assistant usher, Vankin. "Who is it? A-a-h! . . .
> Delighted to meet you! Sergei Kapitonich! You're a
> fine grandfather, I must say! Tête-à-tête with
> the fair sex--tette!"
>
> "I'm not kissing," said Ahineev in confusion. "Who
> told you so, you fool? I was only . . . I smacked
> my lips . . . in reference to . . . as an
> indication of. . . pleasure . . . at the sight of
> the fish."
>
> "Tell that to the marines!" The intrusive face
> vanished, wearing a broad grin.
>
> Ahineev flushed.
>
> "Hang it!" he thought, "the beast will go now and
> talk scandal. He'll disgrace me to all the town,
> the brute."
>
> Ahineev went timidly into the drawing-room and
> looked stealthily round for Vankin. Vankin was
> standing by the piano, and, bending down with a
> jaunty air, was whispering something to the
> inspector's sister-in-law, who was laughing.
>
> "Talking about me!" thought Ahineev. "About me,
> blast him! And she believes it . . . believes it!
> She laughs! Mercy on us! No, I can't let it pass .
> . . I can't. I must do something to prevent his
> being believed. . . . I'll speak to them all, and
> he'll be shown up for a fool and a gossip."
>
> Ahineev scratched his head, and still overcome
> with embarrassment, went up to Pasdequoi.
>
> "I've just been in the kitchen to see after the
> supper," he said to the Frenchman. "I know you are
> fond of fish, and I've a sturgeon, my dear fellow,
> beyond everything! A yard and a half long! Ha, ha,
> ha! And, by the way . . . I was just forgetting. .
> . . In the kitchen just now, with that sturgeon .
> . . quite a little story! I went into the kitchen
> just now and wanted to look at the supper dishes.
> I looked at the sturgeon and I smacked my lips
> with relish . . . at the piquancy of it. And at
> the very moment that fool Vankin came in and said:
> . . . 'Ha, ha, ha! . . . So you're kissing here!'
> Kissing Marfa, the cook! What a thing to imagine,
> silly fool! The woman is a perfect fright, like
> all the beasts put together, and he talks about
> kissing! Queer fish!"
>
> "Who's a queer fish?" asked Tarantulov, coming
> up.
>
> "Why he, over there -- Vankin! I went into the
> kitchen . . ."
>
> And he told the story of Vankin. ". . . He amused
> me, queer fish! I'd rather kiss a dog than Marfa,
> if you ask me," added Ahineev. He looked round and
> saw behind him Mzda.
>
> "We were talking of Vankin," he said. "Queer fish,
> he is! He went into the kitchen, saw me beside
> Marfa, and began inventing all sorts of silly
> stories. 'Why are you kissing?' he says. He must
> have had a drop too much. 'And I'd rather kiss a
> turkeycock than Marfa,' I said, 'And I've a wife
> of my own, you fool,' said I. He did amuse me!"
>
> "Who amused you?" asked the priest who taught
> Scripture in the school, going up to Ahineev.
>
> "Vankin. I was standing in the kitchen, you know,
> looking at the sturgeon. . . ."
>
> And so on. Within half an hour or so all the
> guests knew the incident of the sturgeon and
> Vankin.
>
> "Let him tell away now!" thought Ahineev, rubbing
> his hands. "Let him! He'll begin telling his story
> and they'll say to him at once, 'Enough of your
> improbable nonsense, you fool, we know all about
> it!' "
>
> And Ahineev was so relieved that in his joy he
> drank four glasses too many. After escorting the
> young people to their room, he went to bed and
> slept like an innocent babe, and next day he
> thought no more of the incident with the sturgeon.
> But, alas! man proposes, but God disposes. An evil
> tongue did its evil work, and Ahineev's strategy
> was of no avail. Just a week later -- to be
> precise, on Wednesday after the third lesson --
> when Ahineev was standing in the middle of the
> teacher's room, holding forth on the vicious
> propensities of a boy called Visekin, the head
> master went up to him and drew him aside:
>
> "Look here, Sergei Kapitonich," said the head
> master, "you must excuse me. . . . It's not my
> business; but all the same I must make you
> realize. . . . It's my duty. You see, there are
> rumors that you are romancing with that . . .
> cook. . . . It's nothing to do with me, but . . .
> flirt with her, kiss her . . . as you please, but
> don't let it be so public, please. I entreat you!
> Don't forget that you're a schoolmaster."
>
> Ahineev turned cold and faint. He went home like a
> man stung by a whole swarm of bees, like a man
> scalded with boiling water. As he walked home, it
> seemed to him that the whole town was looking at
> him as though he were smeared with pitch. At home
> fresh trouble awaited him.
>
> "Why aren't you gobbling up your food as usual?"
> his wife asked him at dinner. "What are you so
> pensive about? Brooding over your amours? Pining
> for your Marfa? I know all about it, Mohammedan!
> Kind friends have opened my eyes! O-o-o! . . . you
> savage!"
>
> And she slapped him in the face. He got up from
> the table, not feeling the earth under his feet,
> and without his hat or coat, made his way to
> Vankin. He found him at home.
>
> "You scoundrel!" he addressed him. "Why have you
> covered me with mud before all the town? Why did
> you set this slander going about me?"
>
> "What slander? What are you talking about?"
>
> "Who was it gossiped of my kissing Marfa? Wasn't
> it you? Tell me that. Wasn't it you, you
> brigand?"
>
> Vankin blinked and twitched in every fibre of his
> battered countenance, raised his eyes to the icon
> and articulated, "God blast me! Strike me blind
> and lay me out, if I said a single word about you!
> May I be left without house and home, may I be
> stricken with worse than cholera!"
>
> Vankin's sincerity did not admit of doubt. It was
> evidently not he who was the author of the
> slander.
>
> "But who, then, who?" Ahineev wondered, going over
> all his acquaintances in his mind and beating
> himself on the breast. "Who, then?"
>
> Who, then? We, too, ask the reader.
tl;dr
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Third Time's the Charm, pt 1
()
Date: March 17, 2015 04:11AM
INT. HENRICO COUNTY MAGISTRATE'S OFFICE
The office is a small room in the back of a grocery store, heated by a potbelly stove.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Hmmmm... Let's see here.
On the one hand, we've got some 1,300 posts by "eesh" harassing
Meade Skelton, and on 'tother, we've got 22 posts that criticize "eesh"
for stalking, threats, blah blah blah, etc.
Hey! That a picture of your gun, Mike? It's a beaut.
"EESH"
Thanks, your Honor!
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
And what's this you wrote next to it? "Hi Chuck." Haw haw.
I suppose this pansy "Chuck" felt threatened by that?
"EESH"
(rolls eyes)
Oh yeah. He made quite a fuss. Quite the little bitch, if you'll pardon
my fran-sezz. Acted like he'd never seen a gun before. And it's not
like I actually threatened him. Well, maybe just a little. But this guy...
Your Honor, you've never met such a jerk.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Sounds like he deserved it. Anyway, this Meade character, so he's
been threatening you?
"EESH"
Your Honor, he actually had the nerve to post a video on Youtube in
which he called me a "troll" ! And he's crazy, your Honor. He --
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Don't waste your breath son. The evidence of probable cause is
overwhelming. Now, where's that durn warrant?
He locates and signs it, hands it to "eesh".
"EESH"
Oh, thank you, your Honor! Um, I don't want to take up a lot of your
time, but if you don't mind, there are these two other guys who have
been threatening me. Chuckhoffman, you know, that jerk I was telling
you about. And this other character, MrMisery, who's just plain nuts.
HENRICO'S FINEST MAGISTRATE
Happy to oblige, Mike. Anything else?
The magistrate begins to prepare the two additional warrants.
"EESH"
Nope. I'm all set..................
"Eesh" rubs his hands together, smiling gleefully.
INT. FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
A *REAL* JUDGE
Are you kidding me?
"EESH"
Bu- bu- bu- your Honor! The evidence...!
A *REAL* JUDGE
(sighs)
What evidence? This?
(holds up several pages)
This is not evidence. This is... This is garbage.
"EESH
But your Honor! I'm in fear for my life from this man!!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Then why did you repeatedly, over a period of months,
mock the very idea that you had anything to fear from
MrMisery? Indeed, you stated that he was too afraid to
get in his car and drive out of his own neighborhood.
"EESH"
Well, things have changed! You saw that post --
A *REAL* JUDGE
The one by "FagCity99"?
"EESH
Yes!
A *REAL* JUDGE
And you know exactly how that that was posted by
"MrMisery"?
"EESH
Well, I just do! I am expert in detecting the "voice"
of "MrMisery." I could spot it anywhere.
A *REAL* JUDGE
Well, that's just not good enough, Mr. Eesh. It's not
nearly good enough.
"EESH
But I'm the VICTIM here. Just look at these pamphlets.
He holds out his VINE pamphlets beseeshingly.
"EESH
Right there in black and white, it says I'm the victim.
It SAYS so! And it's signed by the District Attorney!
A *REAL* JUDGE
(bangs gavel)
The case is dismissed. Defendant is ordered to pay costs.
"EESH
What?! Pay costs?!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Another word and I'll hold you in contempt.
"EESH
How 'bout two words. FUCK YOU. You fucking asshole.
I'll KILL you, bitch!!
A *REAL* JUDGE
Bailiff, remove the defendant from the courtroom.
Eesh is dragged struggling and kicking from the room.
"EESH
You haven't seen the last of me, you fucking bitch!
I know where you live!
The judge watches calmly for a few moments, until eesh is gone. Then he turns to Miz.
A *REAL* JUDGE
Now, tell me, MrMisery. Who is this individual "Cary"
you mentioned? Who, as you put it --
He puts on his reading glasses, looks through his papers. Finds a page, holds it up, and begins to read.
A *REAL* JUDGE
You write, "Acting with a reckless and callous disregard
for the rights and safety of others, Cary permitted and
empowered 'eesh' to use Fairfax Underground as an instrument
for 'eesh's' sociopathic aggression."
He pauses, and removes his glass. Looks at Miz.
End of Part 1.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
()
Date: March 17, 2015 04:26AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> schedule
> > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe
> as
> > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> case
> > of Misery v. Eesh.
>
>
> No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> break."
>
>
> > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that
> Eesh
> > is in a lot of trouble here.
>
>
> No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> makes you feel better.
>
>
> > First, the atmospherics...
> >
> > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > trials and so, for the most part, those present
> in
> > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> their
> > motions before the court.
>
>
> It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly
> continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> asking for continuances, more power to you.
>
>
> > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> they sat
> > together in the back row until their case was
> > called.
>
> > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> Khaki
> > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> Lizzy
> > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > appeared to be business attire and running
> shoes.
> > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> > that the court was in session, she left the
> > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> Misery
> > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > missed most of the proceedings.
>
>
> I get it, you were there and you really want us to
> know you saw us.
>
>
> > Someone who I assumed was Misery was there,
> as
> > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > casually.
>
>
> No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> attorney. It was just a motions day.
>
> > Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> and
> > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> > himself well professionally during and after
> the
> > proceedings.
>
> Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> congratulations.
>
>
> > The biggest surprise for me, though, was that
> Eesh
> > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > Underground users who are not attorneys) means
> he
> > was without counsel.
>
>
> This was already known on the site.
>
> > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> the
> > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> case.
>
>
> No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary
> judgement is entirely different.
>
>
> > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> speak
> > to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> > confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> suit
> > within the time period required by law and
> still
> > had not filed a response.
>
>
> You should have listened more instead of noting
> how I was dressed.
>
>
> As a general matter,
> > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> party)
> > will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> > against the defendant (the person who is being
> > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
>
> Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again,
> default judgement, not summary judgement.
>
>
>
> > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> asking
> > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> rule
> > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> > plaintiff).
>
>
> It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash
> process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have
> listened more.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney presented a compelling case
> in
> > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> court
> > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had
> not
> > responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.
>
>
>
>
> No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> what is needed when the service is posted to a
> door of an abode.
>
> Again, you should have been listening.
>
>
> He
> > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> of
> > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> attorneys
> > fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> > research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> the
> > case without summary judgement.
>
>
> That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At
> this point you are making things up.
>
>
> > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash
> service.
>
>
> You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the
> judge accepted my explanation.
>
>
> > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> not
> > responded at all, let alone within the
> timeframes
> > required by law; and that grounds were there
> for
> > summary judgement.
>
>
> No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> followed. She also noted that I did respond, and
> she even said that default judgement cannot occur
> when service is posted to a door of an abode.
>
> She indicated however, that
> > she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> Pro
> > Se.
>
>
> More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro
> Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion
> for default judgement, or summary judgement as you
> are determined to call it.
>
>
> She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> service
> > -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> > failure to properly file it.
>
>
> Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.
>
>
> > Eesh appeared confused about the legalities
> of the
> > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> in
> > order to defend himself, saying several times
> that
> > he has no legal training; that he is attending
> > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> attorney
> > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > which he did not have.
>
>
> Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
>
>
> > The judge was having none of it.
>
>
> Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but
> we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
>
>
> > She told him that he was gambling by not
> having
> > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> to
> > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> aspects
> > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > satisfactorily answer her.
>
>
> Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> called me a gambler for acting pro se.
>
>
> > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
>
> ...but you just said "she was having none of
> that."
>
>
>
> > She denied both the motion for summary
> judgement
> > and the motion to quash service.
>
>
> She denied the motion for default judgement, the
> motion to quash service will be heard again.
>
>
>
> However, she
> > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> suit
> > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> denied
> > that request without prejudice, saying that the
> > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > appropriate time.
>
>
> Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have
> both.
>
>
> > Eesh is in trouble.
> >
> > My free legal advice to him is ...
>
>
>
> Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going
> to be good.
>
> > First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford
> one,
> > SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
>
>
> Sounds like you have experience with crying to the
> ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> were trampled upon at one point.
>
>
> This
> > is a significant case that could have
> implications
> > far beyond FFX Underground
>
> Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit,
> pure and simple.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > represented, as well.
>
>
> Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by
> the attorneys that I have consulted.
>
>
> > Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground
> until
> > this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > things you might post might hurt you.
>
>
> I know you want me off the site, and I know that
> it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> try harder with the pseudo-advice.
>
>
> > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might
> be (I
> > offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation
> of
> > her), you might not want to show up with her in
> > court.
>
>
> She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> take care of something.
>
>
> If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> prior
> > proceedings.
>
>
> You mean......she could be impeached as a witness?
> Is that what you are attempting to say?
>
>
> And she DOES have pending felony
> > charges against her (although, from what I can
> > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> >
> > More later...
>
>
> ...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow
> that escapes you.
>
>
>
>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.
interior/final scene:
Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the story, Mr. Scott?"
(Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press, having just finished explaining the truth--that the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the bureau, just out of Ransome's view)
Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
(Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face Ransom, incredulity written in his face)
Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even this here legend, though....you sure this is how it happened? Let me look at my notes....something mighty off about this here draft...wait just a second..."
(eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror replaces the incredulity)
Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at all, it's--it's--"
(Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave, bursts through the doors and whips out his mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins printing the story anyway)
Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up): "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella' bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin actually shot the great Liberty Valance? Heh...'that'll be the day'..."
(close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted story, swapped out with Scott's original draft...printing press in motion)
end(?)
/
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> schedule
> > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe
> as
> > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> case
> > of Misery v. Eesh.
>
>
> No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> break."
>
>
> > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that
> Eesh
> > is in a lot of trouble here.
>
>
> No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> makes you feel better.
>
>
> > First, the atmospherics...
> >
> > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > trials and so, for the most part, those present
> in
> > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> their
> > motions before the court.
>
>
> It was just a motions day. Very mundane and mostly
> continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> asking for continuances, more power to you.
>
>
> > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> they sat
> > together in the back row until their case was
> > called.
>
> > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> Khaki
> > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> Lizzy
> > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > appeared to be business attire and running
> shoes.
> > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time
> > that the court was in session, she left the
> > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I
> > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> Misery
> > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > missed most of the proceedings.
>
>
> I get it, you were there and you really want us to
> know you saw us.
>
>
> > Someone who I assumed was Misery was there,
> as
> > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > casually.
>
>
> No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> attorney. It was just a motions day.
>
> > Misery's attorney was unconventional in his
> > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> and
> > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported
> > himself well professionally during and after
> the
> > proceedings.
>
> Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> congratulations.
>
>
> > The biggest surprise for me, though, was that
> Eesh
> > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > Underground users who are not attorneys) means
> he
> > was without counsel.
>
>
> This was already known on the site.
>
> > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> the
> > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by
> > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> case.
>
>
> No, it was a motion for default judgement. Summary
> judgement is entirely different.
>
>
> > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> speak
> > to any of the parties after the proceedings to
> > confirm this), the motion was predicated on the
> > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> suit
> > within the time period required by law and
> still
> > had not filed a response.
>
>
> You should have listened more instead of noting
> how I was dressed.
>
>
> As a general matter,
> > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> party)
> > will ask the court to enter a summary judgement
> > against the defendant (the person who is being
> > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
>
>
> Charging party? LOL You mean moving party. Again,
> default judgement, not summary judgement.
>
>
>
> > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> asking
> > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> rule
> > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > given proper notice of the motions filed by the
> > plaintiff).
>
>
> It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to quash
> process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should have
> listened more.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney presented a compelling case
> in
> > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> court
> > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had
> not
> > responded to the suit in the proper timeframe.
>
>
>
>
> No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> what is needed when the service is posted to a
> door of an abode.
>
> Again, you should have been listening.
>
>
> He
> > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> of
> > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> attorneys
> > fees and costs that had been incurred so far to
> > research, prepared, file, and argue the motions
> > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> the
> > case without summary judgement.
>
>
> That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition". At
> this point you are making things up.
>
>
> > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no
> > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > Instead, contended that he had not been
> properly
> > served and asked the judge to quash
> service.
>
>
> You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> explain what happened. It's not a defense, and the
> judge accepted my explanation.
>
>
> > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that
> > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> not
> > responded at all, let alone within the
> timeframes
> > required by law; and that grounds were there
> for
> > summary judgement.
>
>
> No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> followed. She also noted that I did respond, and
> she even said that default judgement cannot occur
> when service is posted to a door of an abode.
>
> She indicated however, that
> > she was reluctant to do so in this instance at
> > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> Pro
> > Se.
>
>
> More bullshit from you. The fact I was there Pro
> Se had no impact on her ruling against the motion
> for default judgement, or summary judgement as you
> are determined to call it.
>
>
> She castigated Eesh for not responding to the
> > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> service
> > -- both on the merits of the motion and for his
> > failure to properly file it.
>
>
> Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> process had merits, which why she didn't deny it.
>
>
> > Eesh appeared confused about the legalities
> of the
> > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> in
> > order to defend himself, saying several times
> that
> > he has no legal training; that he is attending
> > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> attorney
> > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > which he did not have.
>
>
> Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
>
>
> > The judge was having none of it.
>
>
> Actually, she was very laid back and friendly, but
> we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
>
>
> > She told him that he was gambling by not
> having
> > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> to
> > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> aspects
> > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > satisfactorily answer her.
>
>
> Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> called me a gambler for acting pro se.
>
>
> > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
>
>
> ...but you just said "she was having none of
> that."
>
>
>
> > She denied both the motion for summary
> judgement
> > and the motion to quash service.
>
>
> She denied the motion for default judgement, the
> motion to quash service will be heard again.
>
>
>
> However, she
> > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> suit
> > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> denied
> > that request without prejudice, saying that the
> > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > appropriate time.
>
>
> Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't have
> both.
>
>
> > Eesh is in trouble.
> >
> > My free legal advice to him is ...
>
>
>
> Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is going
> to be good.
>
> > First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford
> one,
> > SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney
> > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
>
>
> Sounds like you have experience with crying to the
> ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> were trampled upon at one point.
>
>
> This
> > is a significant case that could have
> implications
> > far beyond FFX Underground
>
> Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious lawsuit,
> pure and simple.
>
>
> > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > represented, as well.
>
>
> Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told by
> the attorneys that I have consulted.
>
>
> > Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground
> until
> > this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly
> > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > things you might post might hurt you.
>
>
> I know you want me off the site, and I know that
> it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> try harder with the pseudo-advice.
>
>
> > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might
> be (I
> > offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation
> of
> > her), you might not want to show up with her in
> > court.
>
>
> She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> take care of something.
>
>
> If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> prior
> > proceedings.
>
>
> You mean......she could be impeached as a witness?
> Is that what you are attempting to say?
>
>
> And she DOES have pending felony
> > charges against her (although, from what I can
> > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> >
> > More later...
>
>
> ...and that has no relation to this suit. Somehow
> that escapes you.
>
>
>
>
> So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You were
> more interested in taking note of what I was
> wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> You also want me off the site and want me to stop
> associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> threatened enough to sit by us in person.
interior/final scene:
Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the story, Mr. Scott?"
(Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press, having just finished explaining the truth--that the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the bureau, just out of Ransome's view)
Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
(Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face Ransom, incredulity written in his face)
Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even this here legend, though....you sure this is how it happened? Let me look at my notes....something mighty off about this here draft...wait just a second..."
(eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror replaces the incredulity)
Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at all, it's--it's--"
(Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave, bursts through the doors and whips out his mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins printing the story anyway)
Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up): "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella' bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin actually shot the great Liberty Valance? Heh...'that'll be the day'..."
(close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted story, swapped out with Scott's original draft...printing press in motion)
end(?)
/
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
XvPud
()
Date: March 17, 2015 04:54AM
Okay, that's pretty cool.
Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's lawless thug political regime.
Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to hell, that might be pretty cool, too.
And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.
Pompey: It begun with the words, uh… “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that, uh, that…”
Rance: “That all men are created equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just plumb forgot it.
Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of people forget that part of it.
Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's lawless thug political regime.
Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to hell, that might be pretty cool, too.
And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.
Pompey: It begun with the words, uh… “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that, uh, that…”
Rance: “That all men are created equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just plumb forgot it.
Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of people forget that part of it.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
6VYLy
()
Date: March 17, 2015 09:12AM
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> > schedule
> > > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to
> observe
> > as
> > > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> > case
> > > of Misery v. Eesh.
> >
> >
> > No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> > 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> > finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> > break."
> >
> >
> > > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is
> that
> > Eesh
> > > is in a lot of trouble here.
> >
> >
> > No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> > makes you feel better.
> >
> >
> > > First, the atmospherics...
> > >
> > > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > > trials and so, for the most part, those
> present
> > in
> > > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> > their
> > > motions before the court.
> >
> >
> > It was just a motions day. Very mundane and
> mostly
> > continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> > idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> > asking for continuances, more power to you.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> > they sat
> > > together in the back row until their case was
> > > called.
> >
> > > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> > Khaki
> > > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> > Lizzy
> > > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > > appeared to be business attire and running
> > shoes.
> > > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the
> time
> > > that the court was in session, she left the
> > > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls,
> I
> > > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> > Misery
> > > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > > missed most of the proceedings.
> >
> >
> > I get it, you were there and you really want us
> to
> > know you saw us.
> >
> >
> > > Someone who I assumed was Misery was
> there,
> > as
> > > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > > casually.
> >
> >
> > No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> > attorney. It was just a motions day.
> >
> > > Misery's attorney was unconventional in
> his
> > > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> > and
> > > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he
> comported
> > > himself well professionally during and after
> > the
> > > proceedings.
> >
> > Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> > congratulations.
> >
> >
> > > The biggest surprise for me, though, was
> that
> > Eesh
> > > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > > Underground users who are not attorneys)
> means
> > he
> > > was without counsel.
> >
> >
> > This was already known on the site.
> >
> > > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> > the
> > > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion
> by
> > > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> > case.
> >
> >
> > No, it was a motion for default judgement.
> Summary
> > judgement is entirely different.
> >
> >
> > > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> > speak
> > > to any of the parties after the proceedings
> to
> > > confirm this), the motion was predicated on
> the
> > > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> > suit
> > > within the time period required by law and
> > still
> > > had not filed a response.
> >
> >
> > You should have listened more instead of noting
> > how I was dressed.
> >
> >
> > As a general matter,
> > > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> > party)
> > > will ask the court to enter a summary
> judgement
> > > against the defendant (the person who is
> being
> > > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
> >
> >
> > Charging party? LOL You mean moving party.
> Again,
> > default judgement, not summary judgement.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> > asking
> > > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> > rule
> > > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > > given proper notice of the motions filed by
> the
> > > plaintiff).
> >
> >
> > It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to
> quash
> > process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should
> have
> > listened more.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney presented a compelling
> case
> > in
> > > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> > court
> > > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh
> had
> > not
> > > responded to the suit in the proper
> timeframe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> > incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> > what is needed when the service is posted to a
> > door of an abode.
> >
> > Again, you should have been listening.
> >
> >
> > He
> > > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> > of
> > > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> > attorneys
> > > fees and costs that had been incurred so far
> to
> > > research, prepared, file, and argue the
> motions
> > > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> > the
> > > case without summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition".
> At
> > this point you are making things up.
> >
> >
> > > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered
> no
> > > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > > Instead, contended that he had not been
> > properly
> > > served and asked the judge to quash
> > service.
> >
> >
> > You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> > explain what happened. It's not a defense, and
> the
> > judge accepted my explanation.
> >
> >
> > > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney
> that
> > > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> > not
> > > responded at all, let alone within the
> > timeframes
> > > required by law; and that grounds were there
> > for
> > > summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> > noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> > laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> > followed. She also noted that I did respond,
> and
> > she even said that default judgement cannot
> occur
> > when service is posted to a door of an abode.
> >
> > She indicated however, that
> > > she was reluctant to do so in this instance
> at
> > > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> > Pro
> > > Se.
> >
> >
> > More bullshit from you. The fact I was there
> Pro
> > Se had no impact on her ruling against the
> motion
> > for default judgement, or summary judgement as
> you
> > are determined to call it.
> >
> >
> > She castigated Eesh for not responding to
> the
> > > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> > service
> > > -- both on the merits of the motion and for
> his
> > > failure to properly file it.
> >
> >
> > Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> > process had merits, which why she didn't deny
> it.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh appeared confused about the
> legalities
> > of the
> > > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> > in
> > > order to defend himself, saying several times
> > that
> > > he has no legal training; that he is
> attending
> > > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> > attorney
> > > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > > which he did not have.
> >
> >
> > Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
> >
> >
> > > The judge was having none of it.
> >
> >
> > Actually, she was very laid back and friendly,
> but
> > we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
> >
> >
> > > She told him that he was gambling by not
> > having
> > > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> > to
> > > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> > aspects
> > > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > > satisfactorily answer her.
> >
> >
> > Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> > called me a gambler for acting pro se.
> >
> >
> > > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
> >
> >
> > ...but you just said "she was having none of
> > that."
> >
> >
> >
> > > She denied both the motion for summary
> > judgement
> > > and the motion to quash service.
> >
> >
> > She denied the motion for default judgement,
> the
> > motion to quash service will be heard again.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, she
> > > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> > suit
> > > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> > denied
> > > that request without prejudice, saying that
> the
> > > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > > appropriate time.
> >
> >
> > Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> > denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> > she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't
> have
> > both.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh is in trouble.
> > >
> > > My free legal advice to him is ...
> >
> >
> >
> > Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is
> going
> > to be good.
> >
> > > First, get an attorney. If you cannot
> afford
> > one,
> > > SURELY you can find a First Amendment
> attorney
> > > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Sounds like you have experience with crying to
> the
> > ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> > were trampled upon at one point.
> >
> >
> > This
> > > is a significant case that could have
> > implications
> > > far beyond FFX Underground
> >
> > Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious
> lawsuit,
> > pure and simple.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > > represented, as well.
> >
> >
> > Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told
> by
> > the attorneys that I have consulted.
> >
> >
> > > Second, stop posting on Fairfax
> Underground
> > until
> > > this suit is over. Nothing you could
> possibly
> > > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > > things you might post might hurt you.
> >
> >
> > I know you want me off the site, and I know
> that
> > it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> > try harder with the pseudo-advice.
> >
> >
> > > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy
> might
> > be (I
> > > offer neither an endorsement nor a
> commendation
> > of
> > > her), you might not want to show up with her
> in
> > > court.
> >
> >
> > She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> > take care of something.
> >
> >
> > If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> > prior
> > > proceedings.
> >
> >
> > You mean......she could be impeached as a
> witness?
> > Is that what you are attempting to say?
> >
> >
> > And she DOES have pending felony
> > > charges against her (although, from what I
> can
> > > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> > >
> > > More later...
> >
> >
> > ...and that has no relation to this suit.
> Somehow
> > that escapes you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> > bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You
> were
> > more interested in taking note of what I was
> > wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> > You also want me off the site and want me to
> stop
> > associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> > threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> > threatened enough to sit by us in person.
>
>
>
>
>
> interior/final scene:
>
>
> Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the
> story, Mr. Scott?"
>
> (Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press,
> having just finished explaining the truth--that
> the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin
> actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a
> draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the
> bureau, just out of Ransome's view)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir.
> When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
>
> (Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the
> bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in
> his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and
> inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face
> Ransom, incredulity written in his face)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we
> got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even
> this here legend, though....you sure this is how
> it happened? Let me look at my notes....something
> mighty off about this here draft...wait just a
> second..."
>
> (eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror
> replaces the incredulity)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at
> all, it's--it's--"
>
> (Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave,
> bursts through the doors and whips out his
> mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins
> printing the story anyway)
>
> Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up):
> "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella'
> bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin
> actually shot the great Liberty Valance?
> Heh...'that'll be the day'..."
>
> (close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted
> story, swapped out with Scott's original
> draft...printing press in motion)
>
>
> end(?)
>
> /
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I had a couple of hour-long break in my
> > schedule
> > > this morning, and so I decided to drop into
> > > Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to
> observe
> > as
> > > much as I could of today's proceedings in the
> > case
> > > of Misery v. Eesh.
> >
> >
> > No, the judge didn't enter the courtroom until
> > 10:20, and it was well past 12:00 when I got
> > finished. You weren't there because you "had a
> > break."
> >
> >
> > > My Bottom-Line take on the situation is
> that
> > Eesh
> > > is in a lot of trouble here.
> >
> >
> > No, not actually, but keep wishing that if it
> > makes you feel better.
> >
> >
> > > First, the atmospherics...
> > >
> > > The court was entertaining pretrial and
> > > interlocutory motions, rather than conducting
> > > trials and so, for the most part, those
> present
> > in
> > > and addressing the court were attorneys for
> > > plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing
> > their
> > > motions before the court.
> >
> >
> > It was just a motions day. Very mundane and
> mostly
> > continuances before we got to be heard. If your
> > idea of entertainment is listening to attorneys
> > asking for continuances, more power to you.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and
> > they sat
> > > together in the back row until their case was
> > > called.
> >
> > > Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed
> > Khaki
> > > pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie.
> > Lizzy
> > > was conservatively dressed in black in what
> > > appeared to be business attire and running
> > shoes.
> > > While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the
> time
> > > that the court was in session, she left the
> > > courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls,
> I
> > > believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she
> > > actually was out of the courtroom when the
> > Misery
> > > v. Eesh case was called before the judge and
> > > missed most of the proceedings.
> >
> >
> > I get it, you were there and you really want us
> to
> > know you saw us.
> >
> >
> > > Someone who I assumed was Misery was
> there,
> > as
> > > well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> > > casually.
> >
> >
> > No, the plaintiffs weren't there, just the
> > attorney. It was just a motions day.
> >
> > > Misery's attorney was unconventional in
> his
> > > appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair
> > and
> > > a good amount of facial hair. But he was
> > > professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress
> > > shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he
> comported
> > > himself well professionally during and after
> > the
> > > proceedings.
> >
> > Again, you proved your point. You were there,
> > congratulations.
> >
> >
> > > The biggest surprise for me, though, was
> that
> > Eesh
> > > was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX
> > > Underground users who are not attorneys)
> means
> > he
> > > was without counsel.
> >
> >
> > This was already known on the site.
> >
> > > The purpose of today's proceedings was for
> > the
> > > court to hear arguments and rule on a motion
> by
> > > Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the
> > case.
> >
> >
> > No, it was a motion for default judgement.
> Summary
> > judgement is entirely different.
> >
> >
> > > As best as I can understand it (I did not
> > speak
> > > to any of the parties after the proceedings
> to
> > > confirm this), the motion was predicated on
> the
> > > fact that Eesh did not file a response to the
> > suit
> > > within the time period required by law and
> > still
> > > had not filed a response.
> >
> >
> > You should have listened more instead of noting
> > how I was dressed.
> >
> >
> > As a general matter,
> > > when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging
> > party)
> > > will ask the court to enter a summary
> judgement
> > > against the defendant (the person who is
> being
> > > sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
> >
> >
> > Charging party? LOL You mean moving party.
> Again,
> > default judgement, not summary judgement.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary
> > > judgement was to file a motion of his own,
> > asking
> > > the judge to quash service (ask the judge to
> > rule
> > > that he, the defendant, had not been properly
> > > served or given notice of the suit and/or not
> > > given proper notice of the motions filed by
> the
> > > plaintiff).
> >
> >
> > It wasn't a defense. It's called a motion to
> quash
> > process pursuant to § 8.01-277. You should
> have
> > listened more.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney presented a compelling
> case
> > in
> > > favor of his motion for summary judgement,
> > > asserting that the suit and notice had been
> > > properly served by the Sheriff, offering the
> > court
> > > proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh
> had
> > not
> > > responded to the suit in the proper
> timeframe.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No, I responded in a timely manner, noting the
> > incomplete service. § 8.01-296(2)(b) lays out
> > what is needed when the service is posted to a
> > door of an abode.
> >
> > Again, you should have been listening.
> >
> >
> > He
> > > asked that, in the alternative, if the judge
> > > declined to make a summary judgement in favor
> > of
> > > Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in
> > attorneys
> > > fees and costs that had been incurred so far
> to
> > > research, prepared, file, and argue the
> motions
> > > and that said fees and costs be paid as a
> > > precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in
> > the
> > > case without summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > That's not what he said. LOL at "precondition".
> At
> > this point you are making things up.
> >
> >
> > > Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered
> no
> > > defense to not having responded to the suit.
> > > Instead, contended that he had not been
> > properly
> > > served and asked the judge to quash
> > service.
> >
> >
> > You don't defend yourself on motions day, you
> > explain what happened. It's not a defense, and
> the
> > judge accepted my explanation.
> >
> >
> > > The judge agreed with Misery's attorney
> that
> > > service had been properly made; that Eesh had
> > not
> > > responded at all, let alone within the
> > timeframes
> > > required by law; and that grounds were there
> > for
> > > summary judgement.
> >
> >
> > No, this is more bullshit from you. The judge
> > noted the service was incomplete, as the steps
> > laid out in § 8.01-296(2)(b) had not been
> > followed. She also noted that I did respond,
> and
> > she even said that default judgement cannot
> occur
> > when service is posted to a door of an abode.
> >
> > She indicated however, that
> > > she was reluctant to do so in this instance
> at
> > > this time, in part because Eesh was appearing
> > Pro
> > > Se.
> >
> >
> > More bullshit from you. The fact I was there
> Pro
> > Se had no impact on her ruling against the
> motion
> > for default judgement, or summary judgement as
> you
> > are determined to call it.
> >
> >
> > She castigated Eesh for not responding to
> the
> > > suit, as well as for his motion to quash
> > service
> > > -- both on the merits of the motion and for
> his
> > > failure to properly file it.
> >
> >
> > Castigated? Not at all. The motion to quash
> > process had merits, which why she didn't deny
> it.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh appeared confused about the
> legalities
> > of the
> > > situation he is in and of what he needs to do
> > in
> > > order to defend himself, saying several times
> > that
> > > he has no legal training; that he is
> attending
> > > school on the GI Bill and has no money for
> > > attorneys; and that he had consulted an
> > attorney
> > > who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case,
> > > which he did not have.
> >
> >
> > Seriously LOL Where are you getting this from?
> >
> >
> > > The judge was having none of it.
> >
> >
> > Actually, she was very laid back and friendly,
> but
> > we'll go along with your melodramatic story.
> >
> >
> > > She told him that he was gambling by not
> > having
> > > counsel and that, at the very least, he needs
> > to
> > > talk with one. She quizzed him on several
> > aspects
> > > of court procedure. He was unable to
> > > satisfactorily answer her.
> >
> >
> > Again, listen more, dramatize less. The lawyer
> > called me a gambler for acting pro se.
> >
> >
> > > In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
> >
> >
> > ...but you just said "she was having none of
> > that."
> >
> >
> >
> > > She denied both the motion for summary
> > judgement
> > > and the motion to quash service.
> >
> >
> > She denied the motion for default judgement,
> the
> > motion to quash service will be heard again.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, she
> > > gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the
> > suit
> > > or properly file a motion to quash service,
> > > whichever he chose to do. On the request by
> > > Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she
> > denied
> > > that request without prejudice, saying that
> the
> > > attorney could bring that up again at the
> > > appropriate time.
> >
> >
> > Again, your story doesn't add up. You say she
> > denied the motion to quash process, now you say
> > she is allowing 10 days to refile. You can't
> have
> > both.
> >
> >
> > > Eesh is in trouble.
> > >
> > > My free legal advice to him is ...
> >
> >
> >
> > Free legal advice from an e-lawyer. This is
> going
> > to be good.
> >
> > > First, get an attorney. If you cannot
> afford
> > one,
> > > SURELY you can find a First Amendment
> attorney
> > > (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Sounds like you have experience with crying to
> the
> > ACLU for help. Let me guess, your civil rights
> > were trampled upon at one point.
> >
> >
> > This
> > > is a significant case that could have
> > implications
> > > far beyond FFX Underground
> >
> > Don't kid yourself. This is a vexatious
> lawsuit,
> > pure and simple.
> >
> >
> > > Misery's attorney is good. You
> > > have little hope of prevailing if you are not
> > > represented, as well.
> >
> >
> > Fortunately, you don't know what I've been told
> by
> > the attorneys that I have consulted.
> >
> >
> > > Second, stop posting on Fairfax
> Underground
> > until
> > > this suit is over. Nothing you could
> possibly
> > > post can help you. But you have no idea how
> > > things you might post might hurt you.
> >
> >
> > I know you want me off the site, and I know
> that
> > it pains you that I have never been banned, but
> > try harder with the pseudo-advice.
> >
> >
> > > Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy
> might
> > be (I
> > > offer neither an endorsement nor a
> commendation
> > of
> > > her), you might not want to show up with her
> in
> > > court.
> >
> >
> > She has no part in this suit, she was there to
> > take care of something.
> >
> >
> > If you want her to be a witness for you,
> > > she might not be permitted to testify on your
> > > behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing
> > prior
> > > proceedings.
> >
> >
> > You mean......she could be impeached as a
> witness?
> > Is that what you are attempting to say?
> >
> >
> > And she DOES have pending felony
> > > charges against her (although, from what I
> can
> > > tell, those charges might well be bogus).
> > >
> > > More later...
> >
> >
> > ...and that has no relation to this suit.
> Somehow
> > that escapes you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the gist from this is, you wrote a lot of
> > bullshit, you clearly weren't listening. You
> were
> > more interested in taking note of what I was
> > wearing than actually listening to the motion.
> > You also want me off the site and want me to
> stop
> > associating with lizzie. Basically, you are
> > threatened by our presence on the site, but not
> > threatened enough to sit by us in person.
>
>
>
>
>
> interior/final scene:
>
>
> Ransom Stoddard: "You're not going to use the
> story, Mr. Scott?"
>
> (Ransom Stoddard, standing by the printing press,
> having just finished explaining the truth--that
> the late, good-hearted rancher Tom Donophin
> actually shot outlaw Liberty Valance, not him; a
> draft of newsman Maxwell Scott's story sits on the
> bureau, just out of Ransome's view)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "This is Fairfax Underground, sir.
> When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
>
> (Maxwell Scott picks up the draft lying on the
> bureau, then pauses a moment, grunts and stops in
> his tracks, brow furrowed suddenly and
> inexplicably; slowly, turns back around to face
> Ransom, incredulity written in his face)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Shit, Ranse....I don't reckon we
> got enough ink in all of Fairfax to print even
> this here legend, though....you sure this is how
> it happened? Let me look at my notes....something
> mighty off about this here draft...wait just a
> second..."
>
> (eyes scanning over the draft, a look of horror
> replaces the incredulity)
>
> Maxwell Scott: "Ransome....this ain't my draft at
> all, it's--it's--"
>
> (Liberty Valance suddenly rises from his grave,
> bursts through the doors and whips out his
> mossberg; shoots Stoddard and Scott dead; begins
> printing the story anyway)
>
> Liberty Valance (in Sergio Leone-style close-up):
> "Well, 'pilgrim'...ya' wanna say that yella'
> bellied lilly livered egg-suckin' dog Tom Donophin
> actually shot the great Liberty Valance?
> Heh...'that'll be the day'..."
>
> (close-up of blood-soaked Liberty Valance-drafted
> story, swapped out with Scott's original
> draft...printing press in motion)
>
>
> end(?)
>
> /
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CWjwd
()
Date: March 17, 2015 09:13AM
XvPud Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that's pretty cool.
>
> Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's
> lawless thug political regime.
>
> Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin
> lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to
> hell, that might be pretty cool, too.
>
> And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the
> side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.
>
> src="https://idreamedmovies.files.wordpress.com/20
> 08/07/pompey.jpg">
> Pompey: It begun with the words, uh…
> “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that,
> uh, that…”
> Rance: “That all men are created
> equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
> Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just
> plumb forgot it.
> Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of
> people forget that part of it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that's pretty cool.
>
> Triumph of Liberty Valance = Rise of Obama's
> lawless thug political regime.
>
> Still, if Tom D's hand shot up through that coffin
> lid, grabbed Vera Miles and dragged her down to
> hell, that might be pretty cool, too.
>
> And maybe Pompey does a voodoo ceremony on the
> side that brings Liberty Valance back to life.
>
> src="https://idreamedmovies.files.wordpress.com/20
> 08/07/pompey.jpg">
> Pompey: It begun with the words, uh…
> “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that,
> uh, that…”
> Rance: “That all men are created
> equal.” That’s fine, Pompey.
> Pompey: I knew that, Mr. Rance, but I just
> plumb forgot it.
> Rance: That’s all right, Pompey. A lot of
> people forget that part of it.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
waste of court time
()
Date: March 17, 2015 09:53AM
Durf46816461946383 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > > understand what the judge said to you.
> > >
> > > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> > idiot
> > > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> > play
> > > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> > >
> > > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get
> the
> > > fuck out.
> >
> > That's not what was said...
>
> Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a
> transcript in a few weeks or so.
Anyone know? Call eesh out on his bullshit.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eesh's legal defense Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh let me summerize in basic terms that you
> > > understand what the judge said to you.
> > >
> > > You got some nerve with no lawyer. You're an
> > idiot
> > > for not having a lawyer. You got ten days to
> > play
> > > ball and lawyer up or that's your ass.
> > >
> > > Do we understand each other bitch? Now get
> the
> > > fuck out.
> >
> > That's not what was said...
>
> Stenographer there? I'm sure we can get a
> transcript in a few weeks or so.
Anyone know? Call eesh out on his bullshit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
LULZzer
()
Date: March 17, 2015 09:55AM
Durf633636173(4728 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?
LMAO
-------------------------------------------------------
> What exactly is it you do other than stalk
> people on FFXU? You are some sort of professional
> community college student?
LMAO
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ne3kp
()
Date: March 17, 2015 11:30AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> do,
> > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > proceeding.
>
>
> Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> out.
you were creeped out by one person going
-------------------------------------------------------
> uberX Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I know Fairfax Underground like I think I
> do,
> > it'll be hard to find a seat at the next
> > proceeding.
>
>
> Please do, I encourage all to come and check it
> out.
you were creeped out by one person going
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Proxy Hopper
()
Date: March 17, 2015 11:51AM
Reserved.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
top of the page to ya!
()
Date: March 17, 2015 11:52AM
Eesh = still fucked
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fat fuck on page 5
()
Date: March 17, 2015 11:57AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
the court transcripts...
()
Date: March 17, 2015 03:20PM
The following are the actual courtroom transcripts:
[ open on interior, courtroom, the Judge banging her gavel ]
Judge: Mr. Basl, are you ready to give your summation?
Basl: [ stepping out] It's just "eesh", if you please, your Honor.. and, yes, I'm ready. [ approaches the jury box ] Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice and later got thawed out by some of your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me! Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my Scion... and run off into the hills, or wherever... Sometimes when I get a message on Fairfax Underground, I wonder: "Did little demons get inside and type it?" I don't know! My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts. As you can see, I'm but a simple pauper with not a dime to his name... I'm just a caveman, your honor... VINE will attest to that fact! Look, it's printed right here on this strange, thin substance you call paper! Furthermore, it says I am a victim... and one of your strange and unfamiliar modern-day authorities which only confuse and confound my primitive caveman intellect is on record as corroborating this fact! Did tiny demons crawl inside my computer and type threatening messages to me, your honor? I don't know! I'm just a simple caveman! But this strange and confusing authority figure told me personally there was probable cause to serve a warrant for the plaintiff's arrest and therefore he is without a shred of credibility in this vexatious suit... this man you modern people call 'maj-i-strit' indicated that these possible demon-messages most likely came from him, because--LOOK--is that not the plaintiff's name signed to this odd and confounding demon-message, on this thing you modern people call paper?! Did the plaintiff in this suit (and the defendant in the case I have initiated for these messages) somehow crawl inside my simple caveman computer, bypassing my simple caveman firewall--and use an overseas proxy to threaten me? I don't know! I'm but a simple, poor caveman, going to college to study computer security and technology... I know nothing of your modern world!"
[Basl pauses deliberately and begins pacing slowly, hands folded behind his back, thoughtfully furrowing his pronounced caveman brow; he continues...]
"...But there is one thing I do know - I have NEVER used a proxy server or TOR in order to reroute illegal online communications directed towards the plaintiff in this case... what is a proxy? Is it some strange kind of mammoth? A sun god? I am confounded and confused by these issues, your honor. Therefore, as an obvious persecuted victim of these modern, rich, computer-savvy people, I ask you place sanctions on them and issue me no less than 10,000 of your modern units of currency, so that I may upgrade my desktop operating system and purchase a new laptop, as it has likely been corrupted by some strange and confusing virus due to this entire ordeal. I move not only to quash this vexatious suit, but on top of my requests for restitution, that (because I am but a simple caveman, representing myself, and know nothing of your modern legal system) the entire family filing this frivolous, vexatious, outrageous suit be thrown in jail for life. I have spoken to many of what you modern people call 'police men', and they all believe and trust me, as I am a credible and upstanding citizen who has only but once driven over 100 miles in one of your modern contraptions known as a 'car' to leave a threatening note on the plaintiff's property. But... your honor... I mean... come on! [Basl looks around, arms outstretched, drinking in the judge and jury's support and sympathy] And of course, I have used my simple caveman computer to state on multiple occasions an intent to stalk the party filing suit... but again... come on! I'm but a simple caveman. I slipped and fell in some ice thousands of years ago... I know nothing of your modern world, or proxy servers, or anonymizing services, or phishing, or VPN, or IP trackers, or IP spoofing, or TOR, or keylogging, or source code, or firearms, ammunition, concealed carry permits, or sending strange messages to innocent parties which display photographs of these things called 'fire arms', with notes of their names attached, much like the note I so harmlessly travelled 100 miles to place at the plaintiff's property... are these all just strange gods, or magical concepts a simple caveman would know nothing about? I don't know, your honor... but I assure you I am harmless. And I represent myself, here, today, because I am but an indigent, downtrodden caveman... I have no money for legal council. What is legal council, anyway? Is it a strange voodoo ritual I am unaware of? In any case, this proves above all else I am the true victim here. ...Also, I believe I may have PTSD. Thank you.
Judge: The jury will now retire to deliberate.
Jury Foreman: [ standing ] Your Honor.. we don't need to retire. Basl's words are just as true now as they were in his time. We give him the full amount, place sanctions, and declare the moving party a menace to society and sentence the lot of them to life imprisonment for persecuting such a poor, unfortunate, confused man who knows nothing of our modern world or technology. Furthermore, we commend Mr. Basl's bravery in facing these bullies and in advocating for himself. We also understand that, when the victimization became too much for him too handle, he found VINE especially useful.
[ the jury applauds Basl, who is absently focused on his iPhone, chuckling at a Meade Skelton video on Youtube ]
Judge: Did you hear that, Mr. Basl?
Basl: [ iPhone now to his ear ] Hang on a second.. [ to the judge ] I-I'm sorry, your Honor. I was listening to the magic voices coming out of this strange modern invention! [ gives a surreptitious 'thumbs up' to lizzie and Cary, both seated inconspicuously at the back row; smiles maliciously to the camera ]
Announcer: This has been "Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer". Join us next week... at 5am, in your driveway, for another episode.
/
Attachments:
[ open on interior, courtroom, the Judge banging her gavel ]
Judge: Mr. Basl, are you ready to give your summation?
Basl: [ stepping out] It's just "eesh", if you please, your Honor.. and, yes, I'm ready. [ approaches the jury box ] Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice and later got thawed out by some of your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me! Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my Scion... and run off into the hills, or wherever... Sometimes when I get a message on Fairfax Underground, I wonder: "Did little demons get inside and type it?" I don't know! My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts. As you can see, I'm but a simple pauper with not a dime to his name... I'm just a caveman, your honor... VINE will attest to that fact! Look, it's printed right here on this strange, thin substance you call paper! Furthermore, it says I am a victim... and one of your strange and unfamiliar modern-day authorities which only confuse and confound my primitive caveman intellect is on record as corroborating this fact! Did tiny demons crawl inside my computer and type threatening messages to me, your honor? I don't know! I'm just a simple caveman! But this strange and confusing authority figure told me personally there was probable cause to serve a warrant for the plaintiff's arrest and therefore he is without a shred of credibility in this vexatious suit... this man you modern people call 'maj-i-strit' indicated that these possible demon-messages most likely came from him, because--LOOK--is that not the plaintiff's name signed to this odd and confounding demon-message, on this thing you modern people call paper?! Did the plaintiff in this suit (and the defendant in the case I have initiated for these messages) somehow crawl inside my simple caveman computer, bypassing my simple caveman firewall--and use an overseas proxy to threaten me? I don't know! I'm but a simple, poor caveman, going to college to study computer security and technology... I know nothing of your modern world!"
[Basl pauses deliberately and begins pacing slowly, hands folded behind his back, thoughtfully furrowing his pronounced caveman brow; he continues...]
"...But there is one thing I do know - I have NEVER used a proxy server or TOR in order to reroute illegal online communications directed towards the plaintiff in this case... what is a proxy? Is it some strange kind of mammoth? A sun god? I am confounded and confused by these issues, your honor. Therefore, as an obvious persecuted victim of these modern, rich, computer-savvy people, I ask you place sanctions on them and issue me no less than 10,000 of your modern units of currency, so that I may upgrade my desktop operating system and purchase a new laptop, as it has likely been corrupted by some strange and confusing virus due to this entire ordeal. I move not only to quash this vexatious suit, but on top of my requests for restitution, that (because I am but a simple caveman, representing myself, and know nothing of your modern legal system) the entire family filing this frivolous, vexatious, outrageous suit be thrown in jail for life. I have spoken to many of what you modern people call 'police men', and they all believe and trust me, as I am a credible and upstanding citizen who has only but once driven over 100 miles in one of your modern contraptions known as a 'car' to leave a threatening note on the plaintiff's property. But... your honor... I mean... come on! [Basl looks around, arms outstretched, drinking in the judge and jury's support and sympathy] And of course, I have used my simple caveman computer to state on multiple occasions an intent to stalk the party filing suit... but again... come on! I'm but a simple caveman. I slipped and fell in some ice thousands of years ago... I know nothing of your modern world, or proxy servers, or anonymizing services, or phishing, or VPN, or IP trackers, or IP spoofing, or TOR, or keylogging, or source code, or firearms, ammunition, concealed carry permits, or sending strange messages to innocent parties which display photographs of these things called 'fire arms', with notes of their names attached, much like the note I so harmlessly travelled 100 miles to place at the plaintiff's property... are these all just strange gods, or magical concepts a simple caveman would know nothing about? I don't know, your honor... but I assure you I am harmless. And I represent myself, here, today, because I am but an indigent, downtrodden caveman... I have no money for legal council. What is legal council, anyway? Is it a strange voodoo ritual I am unaware of? In any case, this proves above all else I am the true victim here. ...Also, I believe I may have PTSD. Thank you.
Judge: The jury will now retire to deliberate.
Jury Foreman: [ standing ] Your Honor.. we don't need to retire. Basl's words are just as true now as they were in his time. We give him the full amount, place sanctions, and declare the moving party a menace to society and sentence the lot of them to life imprisonment for persecuting such a poor, unfortunate, confused man who knows nothing of our modern world or technology. Furthermore, we commend Mr. Basl's bravery in facing these bullies and in advocating for himself. We also understand that, when the victimization became too much for him too handle, he found VINE especially useful.
[ the jury applauds Basl, who is absently focused on his iPhone, chuckling at a Meade Skelton video on Youtube ]
Judge: Did you hear that, Mr. Basl?
Basl: [ iPhone now to his ear ] Hang on a second.. [ to the judge ] I-I'm sorry, your Honor. I was listening to the magic voices coming out of this strange modern invention! [ gives a surreptitious 'thumbs up' to lizzie and Cary, both seated inconspicuously at the back row; smiles maliciously to the camera ]
Announcer: This has been "Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer". Join us next week... at 5am, in your driveway, for another episode.
/
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Mr. Misery is back!
()
Date: March 17, 2015 06:58PM
Mr. Misery is back!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
unwelcome houseguest
()
Date: March 17, 2015 07:15PM
Mr. Misery is back! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery is back!
"Back" implies that he left at some point.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery is back!
"Back" implies that he left at some point.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Locked up?
()
Date: March 17, 2015 08:01PM
Where's Eesh?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dr Fill
()
Date: March 17, 2015 09:00PM
He's recovering from this embarrassing feat.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Foot doc
()
Date: March 17, 2015 10:19PM
Dr Fill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's recovering from this embarrassing feat.
Dr. Scholls can fix that!
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's recovering from this embarrassing feat.
Dr. Scholls can fix that!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stray Dog
()
Date: March 17, 2015 10:25PM
Unmasking a Confidence Trickster
by Franz Kafka
At last, about ten o'clock at night, I came to the doorway of the fine house where I was invited to spend the evening, after the man beside me, whom I was barely acquainted with and who had once again thrust himself unasked upon me, had marched me for two long hours around the streets.
'Well!' I said, and clapped my hands to show that I really had to bid him goodbye. I had already made several less explicit attempts to get rid of him. I was tired out. 'Are you going straight in?' he asked. I heard a sound in his mouth that was like the snapping of teeth. 'Yes.'
I had been invited out, I told him when I met him. But it was to enter a house where I longed to be that I had been invited, not to stand here at the street door looking past the ears of the man before me. Nor to fall silent with him, as if we were doomed to stay for a long time on this spot. And yet the houses around us at once took a share in our silence, and the darkness over them, all the way up to the stars. And the steps of invisible passers-by, which one could not take the trouble to elucidate, and the wind persistently buffeting the other side of the street, and a gramophone singing behind the closed windows of some room - they all announced themselves in this silence, as if it were their own possession for the time past and to come.
And my companion subscribed to it in his own name and - with a smile - in mine too, stretched his right arm up along the wall and leaned his cheek upon it, shutting his eyes.
But I did not wait to see the end of that smile, for shame suddenly caught hold of me. It had needed that smile to let me know that the man was a confidence trickster, nothing else. And yet I had been months in the town and thought I knew all about confidence tricksters, how they came slinking out of side streets by night to meet us with outstretched hands like tavernkeepers, how they haunted the advertisement pillars we stood beside, sliding around them as if playing hide-and-seek and spying on us with at least one eye, how they suddenly appeared on the curb of the pavement at cross-streets when we were hesitating! I understood them so well, they were the first acquaintances I had made in the town's small taverns, and to them I owed my first inkling of a ruthless hardness which I was now so conscious of, everywhere on earth, that I was even beginning to feel it in myself. How persistently they blocked our way, even when we had long shaken ourselves free, even when, that is, they had nothing more to hope for! How they refused to give up, to admit defeat, but kept shooting glances at us that even from a distance were still compelling! And the means they employed were always the same: they planted themselves before us, looking as large as possible, tried to hinder us from going where we purposed, offered us instead a habitation in their own bosoms, and when at last all our balked feelings rose in revolt they welcomed that like an embrace into which they threw themselves face foremost.
And it had taken me such a long time in this man's company to recognize the same old game. I rubbed my finger tips together to wipe away the disgrace.
My companion was still leaning there as before, still believing himself a successful trickster, and his self-complacency glowed pink on his free cheek.
'Caught in the act!' said I, tapping him lightly on the shoulder. Then I ran up the steps, and the disinterested devotion on the servants' faces in the hall delighted me like an unexpected treat. I looked at them all, one after another, while they took my greatcoat off and wiped my shoes clean.
With a deep breath of relief and straightening myself to my full height, I then entered the drawing room.
/
Attachments:
by Franz Kafka
At last, about ten o'clock at night, I came to the doorway of the fine house where I was invited to spend the evening, after the man beside me, whom I was barely acquainted with and who had once again thrust himself unasked upon me, had marched me for two long hours around the streets.
'Well!' I said, and clapped my hands to show that I really had to bid him goodbye. I had already made several less explicit attempts to get rid of him. I was tired out. 'Are you going straight in?' he asked. I heard a sound in his mouth that was like the snapping of teeth. 'Yes.'
I had been invited out, I told him when I met him. But it was to enter a house where I longed to be that I had been invited, not to stand here at the street door looking past the ears of the man before me. Nor to fall silent with him, as if we were doomed to stay for a long time on this spot. And yet the houses around us at once took a share in our silence, and the darkness over them, all the way up to the stars. And the steps of invisible passers-by, which one could not take the trouble to elucidate, and the wind persistently buffeting the other side of the street, and a gramophone singing behind the closed windows of some room - they all announced themselves in this silence, as if it were their own possession for the time past and to come.
And my companion subscribed to it in his own name and - with a smile - in mine too, stretched his right arm up along the wall and leaned his cheek upon it, shutting his eyes.
But I did not wait to see the end of that smile, for shame suddenly caught hold of me. It had needed that smile to let me know that the man was a confidence trickster, nothing else. And yet I had been months in the town and thought I knew all about confidence tricksters, how they came slinking out of side streets by night to meet us with outstretched hands like tavernkeepers, how they haunted the advertisement pillars we stood beside, sliding around them as if playing hide-and-seek and spying on us with at least one eye, how they suddenly appeared on the curb of the pavement at cross-streets when we were hesitating! I understood them so well, they were the first acquaintances I had made in the town's small taverns, and to them I owed my first inkling of a ruthless hardness which I was now so conscious of, everywhere on earth, that I was even beginning to feel it in myself. How persistently they blocked our way, even when we had long shaken ourselves free, even when, that is, they had nothing more to hope for! How they refused to give up, to admit defeat, but kept shooting glances at us that even from a distance were still compelling! And the means they employed were always the same: they planted themselves before us, looking as large as possible, tried to hinder us from going where we purposed, offered us instead a habitation in their own bosoms, and when at last all our balked feelings rose in revolt they welcomed that like an embrace into which they threw themselves face foremost.
And it had taken me such a long time in this man's company to recognize the same old game. I rubbed my finger tips together to wipe away the disgrace.
My companion was still leaning there as before, still believing himself a successful trickster, and his self-complacency glowed pink on his free cheek.
'Caught in the act!' said I, tapping him lightly on the shoulder. Then I ran up the steps, and the disinterested devotion on the servants' faces in the hall delighted me like an unexpected treat. I looked at them all, one after another, while they took my greatcoat off and wiped my shoes clean.
With a deep breath of relief and straightening myself to my full height, I then entered the drawing room.
/
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9K9Ct
()
Date: March 18, 2015 12:37AM
you all do realize this shit is anon eesh trying to flood the thread with posts that "seem" like misery, right?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
all but 1 post maybe
()
Date: March 18, 2015 12:39AM
don't think so
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Proxy Hopper
()
Date: March 18, 2015 01:07AM
Continued (Part 2)
INT. FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Eesh is dragged struggling and kicking from the room.
"EESH"
You haven't seen the last of me! I know where you live! This is a
felony!! I'm pressin' charges.........!
The judge watches calmly for a few moments, until eesh is gone. Then he turns to Miz.
REAL JUDGE
Now, tell me, MrMisery. Who is this individual "Cary" you mentioned?
He puts on his reading glasses, sorts through the pleadings.
REAL JUDGE
You write, "Acting with a reckless and callous disregard for the
rights and safety of others, Cary permitted and empowered 'eesh' to
use Fairfax Underground as an instrument for 'eesh's' sociopathic
aggression."
Removes glasses, looks at Miz.
REAL JUDGE
What you say here reminds me of a case out of the Ninth Circuit...
The Model Mayhem case, if memory serves.
MrMISERY
Exactly, your Honor!
REAL JUDGE
(thoughtfully)
If anything, this "Cary" character seems far worse than the Model
Mayhem defendants. Do you think, Mr. Leiser, that Model Mayhem is
consistent with Virginia precedents?
PHIL LEISER
Actually, your Honor, I do. Although Model Mayhem rests on a
California precedent, Tarasoff, that Virginia does not follow, Tarasoff,
in turn, rests on larger equitable principles that are followed in
Virginia. Thus we believe that Thompson v. Skate (2001) and Gupton
v. Quicke (1994), among others, lay the precedential foundation for
a Virginia equivalent to the Model Mayhem rule.
REAL JUDGE
By analogy..?
PHIL LEISER
Yes. It is a question of applying settled docrine in a new context, the
internet.
REAL JUDGE
Reasoning by analogy can be a tricky business.
PHIL LEISER
Indeed. We believe, however, that the kind of flagrant abuse of
existing law seen in the case of websites like Fairfax Underground
will lead courts to the proper rule.
Thus, as seemed to be the case in Model Mayhem, bad defendants can
make good law.
Specifically, harm done to innocent third parties by callous defendants -
harm of the kind done to my client, for example - can alert courts to
shortcomings in existing law, and to the proper direction the law must
proceed in the future.
REAL JUDGE
Should you choose to pursue this matter, I think you would be doing
a welcome service for the entire community. There has long been a
peculiar stench from that website. The First Amendment requires us
to put up with it, and indeed with far worse. Of course, any good
citizen who knows a little history accepts that. If we want freedom
of speech for ourselves, we cannot deny it to others. But the First
Amendment has never countenanced such matters as perjury,
defamation, or true threats. It did not countenance publication
of the book Hit Man, and nor should it countenance new forms of
tortious behavior that are emerging with the growth of the internet.
MrMISERY
(timidly)
Your Honor...?
REAL JUDGE
Yes, "MrMisery"?
MrMISERY
When I was preparing for this case, I came across a remark by
Thomas Jefferson which I think is... or may be... ...nawwww...
He stops and looks at the floor, his face turning pink with embarrassment.
REAL JUDGE
(kindly)
Please, go ahead, "MrMisery". You've piqued my interest.
MrMISERY
Well, I, uh, I knew a man named Bill, worked construction, up on
those steel beams... you know the ones... he worked way up high
on steel beams...
(laughs)
Sorry, I got confused for a moment. I'm kind of hungry and I was
just thinking... in my back pocket, this mashed-up jelly donut, and I...
Sorry. Where was I?
Oh, yeah. Jefferson. I saw this remark by Jefferson somewhere, and
it really stuck with me.
He wrote, and I quote. “I am not an advocate for frequent changes in
laws and institutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand
with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed,
more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, and new truths uncovered,
manners and opinions change. And with the change of circumstances,
institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times.
“We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which
fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever
unchanged under a regime of laws that have outlived their
purpose.”
End of quote. And, well, what you said about the First Amendment and
Fairfax Underground, it made me think of that quote.
REAL JUDGE
An apt citation. Thank you, "MrMisery."
I recall that late in Jefferson's life he was deeply troubled by the
fierce struggle that took place over the admission of Missouri as a
slave state. He called it "a fire bell in the night" that filled him
with terror. It was, he thought, the death knell of the Union,
with the Missouri Compromise being only a temporary reprieve.
Jefferson was quite right. His vision of the coming Civil War was
chillingly prophetic.
We may have heard a little fire bell of our own today. To the extent the
law allows a website like Fairfax Underground to be used as an
instrument for sociopathic aggression - as, it would seem, Cary has
both enabled and permitted "eesh" to do - you are no longer dealing
with questions of "free speech." You're --
MrMISERY
(blurts out)
You're shitting on free speech. And if you love free speech, you don't
shit on it!
REAL JUDGE
Well, I wouldn't have put it quite that way myself, but I think that's
exactly right, "MrMisery"!
SUDDENLY AN OLD MAN
in the back of the court room stands up and begins to clap.
After a few moments, several other courtroom observers do likewise.
MIZ'S MOTHER AND FATHER AND SISTER
begin to applaud.
AS DO THE ATTORNEYS...
the stenographer... the bailiff... and the judge, who casts a beneficient, Harry Carey-like smile on Miz.
CLOSE ON MrMISERY
who seems a bit overwhelmed by this unexpected burst of affirmation.
Perhaps, for a few moments, he might be better described as Mr. Happiness.
CUT TO:
INT. "EESH'S" BEDROOM
"Eesh" sits at his computer taking deep breaths, composing himself. Finally he begins to type.
INSERT - COMPUTER SCREEN
We read "eesh's" words as they are typed.
"EESH'S" TYPEWRITTEN WORDS
I came, I saw, I conquered. Contrary to any rumors you may have
heard, justice triumphed today. I kicked MrMisery and his rich
lawyer's ass. I --
The CLICKING of the keyboard abruptly stops.
Eesh stares at the screen for a moment with a blank expression.
Then suddenly:
"EESH"
FUCK!
With some difficulty, he picks up the monitor, yanking violently at the cords. He finally gets it loose and
hurls it across the room. It crashes into the wall and lands on the floor in a heap. Then he falls back into
his chair, emotionally and psychologically exhausted.
"EESH"
Fuck... Fuck him. Fuck that little shit.
Beat.
"EESH"
FUCK!!!
After a moment, he pulls his cell phone from his pocket, punches in a number, and presses it to his ear.
"EESH"
Cary...?
He starts to cry.
"EESH"
I fucked up. It's bad, really bad.
CUT TO:
INT. CARY'S APARTMENT
The room is completely dark except for the cold blue light of a single computer monitor that Cary sits
in front of. We cannot see his face; he is a black silhouette against the light of the monitor.
For several long moments he says nothing. All we hear is the unnaturally loud, almost Darth Vader-ish
sound of his BREATHING.
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Cary, the judge. This fucking asshole. ...He mentioned your name.
CARY
God damn you, Basl. Do I have to do everything for you? Wipe
your fucking ass?
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Cary, please. I can help you... You know I can help you. Just one
more chance. Please. I will not let you down. I'll kill him if I have --
CARY
Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
(takes a deep breah)
We can't talk about this on the phone. Meet me --
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Under the plasma?
CARY
Yes. And bring the Mossberg Chainsaw.
"EESH'S" VOICE
(excited)
The Chainsaw?! You got it, boss. And the horse mask? Can I bring the --
CARY
(cutting him off)
Bring a clown mask. That would be more appropriate.
"EESH'S" VOICE
Boss, please.... I said I was sorry.
CARY
Actually, you didn't. Bring the fucking mask if it makes you happy..
"EESH'S" VOICE
Thank you, Boss, thanks. I --
Cary disconnects, drops the cell into the breast pocket of his short-sleeve, button-down shirt.
We slowly zoom in on Cary's face, deep in thought. The light from the computer monitor has
turned red, giving his features, lit from below, a slightly demonic cast. He purses his lips as
though chewing something sour.
CARY
(almost a whisper)
So be it.
He stands.
CUT TO:
INT. CHUCKHOFFMAN'S SURVEILLANCE ROOM
The room is crowded with a haphazard mix of old-school and cutting edge technology. Chuck is working
a reel-to-reel tape recorder. He reverses the tape with a squealing-jabbering sound. Stops.
He cranks the volume, leans forward, and hits play.
CARY'S VOICE
(over the speakers)
So be it.
He rewinds the tape, plays it again, listening with great concentration.
He stops the tape. Frowns.
He selects a key from the retractable keychain ring clipped to his belt, ulocks the top right drawer
of his desk. He removes a revolver, and a small cardboard box of bullets. He loads the gun methodically,
shuts the chamber with a flip of the wrist, and slips the gun into his pants pocket.
He stands, looking at an old photo of a young woman thumbtacked to the wall. He brushes his thumb
lightly across her cheek.
CHUCK
I'm sorry honey. I know I can never make it right. But if you're up
there, say a little prayer for me. I'm about to do something crazy.
I'm going to kill the devil.
CUT TO:
INT. CLYDE'S, RESTON TOWNE CENTRE
The door swings open.
Enter TheNorthman.
CUT TO:
INT. INKA'S HOT ROD (MOVING)
Inkahootz, right hand firmly on the wheel, trance/hip-hop music BLASTING.
INKA'S LEFT HAND
rests in his lap, loosely holding a nickel-plated revolver.
CUT TO:
EXT./INT. CAR
"Eesh" lies in wait one-half block from the entrance to CLYDE'S.
CUT TO:
EXT. CLYDE'S - LATER
Having received a mysterious invitation via pm from Hoocoodanode, MrMISERY approaches the entrance to Clyde's.
The "spoofed" pm was sent by "eesh," who approaches Miz from behind with the Mossberg.
CUT TO:
EXT. ALLEY
Cary corners "eesh" in a dead-end alley - failure to complete the Miz job spells the end of the line for "eesh".
Cary's CIA handler watches with approval
CUT TO:
INT. APARTMENT
Meanwhile far away in another part of town, the doors and windows have been sealed.
There will be no escape.
CUT TO:
FAIRFAX - 3:00 A.M.
A cold wind blows over the mean streets of Fairfax.
Fade to black.
PS:
Miz gets a happy ending.
Cary develops new and interesting ways of removing "garbarge"
TheNorthman finds his sleep interrupted by disturbing visions. He ages badly.
Chuck receives a mysterious ticket for a luxurious pleasure cruise, upon which, alas, an albatross descends
Inkahootz finds happiness as a carpenter
INT. FAIRFAX COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Eesh is dragged struggling and kicking from the room.
"EESH"
You haven't seen the last of me! I know where you live! This is a
felony!! I'm pressin' charges.........!
The judge watches calmly for a few moments, until eesh is gone. Then he turns to Miz.
REAL JUDGE
Now, tell me, MrMisery. Who is this individual "Cary" you mentioned?
He puts on his reading glasses, sorts through the pleadings.
REAL JUDGE
You write, "Acting with a reckless and callous disregard for the
rights and safety of others, Cary permitted and empowered 'eesh' to
use Fairfax Underground as an instrument for 'eesh's' sociopathic
aggression."
Removes glasses, looks at Miz.
REAL JUDGE
What you say here reminds me of a case out of the Ninth Circuit...
The Model Mayhem case, if memory serves.
MrMISERY
Exactly, your Honor!
REAL JUDGE
(thoughtfully)
If anything, this "Cary" character seems far worse than the Model
Mayhem defendants. Do you think, Mr. Leiser, that Model Mayhem is
consistent with Virginia precedents?
PHIL LEISER
Actually, your Honor, I do. Although Model Mayhem rests on a
California precedent, Tarasoff, that Virginia does not follow, Tarasoff,
in turn, rests on larger equitable principles that are followed in
Virginia. Thus we believe that Thompson v. Skate (2001) and Gupton
v. Quicke (1994), among others, lay the precedential foundation for
a Virginia equivalent to the Model Mayhem rule.
REAL JUDGE
By analogy..?
PHIL LEISER
Yes. It is a question of applying settled docrine in a new context, the
internet.
REAL JUDGE
Reasoning by analogy can be a tricky business.
PHIL LEISER
Indeed. We believe, however, that the kind of flagrant abuse of
existing law seen in the case of websites like Fairfax Underground
will lead courts to the proper rule.
Thus, as seemed to be the case in Model Mayhem, bad defendants can
make good law.
Specifically, harm done to innocent third parties by callous defendants -
harm of the kind done to my client, for example - can alert courts to
shortcomings in existing law, and to the proper direction the law must
proceed in the future.
REAL JUDGE
Should you choose to pursue this matter, I think you would be doing
a welcome service for the entire community. There has long been a
peculiar stench from that website. The First Amendment requires us
to put up with it, and indeed with far worse. Of course, any good
citizen who knows a little history accepts that. If we want freedom
of speech for ourselves, we cannot deny it to others. But the First
Amendment has never countenanced such matters as perjury,
defamation, or true threats. It did not countenance publication
of the book Hit Man, and nor should it countenance new forms of
tortious behavior that are emerging with the growth of the internet.
MrMISERY
(timidly)
Your Honor...?
REAL JUDGE
Yes, "MrMisery"?
MrMISERY
When I was preparing for this case, I came across a remark by
Thomas Jefferson which I think is... or may be... ...nawwww...
He stops and looks at the floor, his face turning pink with embarrassment.
REAL JUDGE
(kindly)
Please, go ahead, "MrMisery". You've piqued my interest.
MrMISERY
Well, I, uh, I knew a man named Bill, worked construction, up on
those steel beams... you know the ones... he worked way up high
on steel beams...
(laughs)
Sorry, I got confused for a moment. I'm kind of hungry and I was
just thinking... in my back pocket, this mashed-up jelly donut, and I...
Sorry. Where was I?
Oh, yeah. Jefferson. I saw this remark by Jefferson somewhere, and
it really stuck with me.
He wrote, and I quote. “I am not an advocate for frequent changes in
laws and institutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand
with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed,
more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, and new truths uncovered,
manners and opinions change. And with the change of circumstances,
institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times.
“We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which
fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever
unchanged under a regime of laws that have outlived their
purpose.”
End of quote. And, well, what you said about the First Amendment and
Fairfax Underground, it made me think of that quote.
REAL JUDGE
An apt citation. Thank you, "MrMisery."
I recall that late in Jefferson's life he was deeply troubled by the
fierce struggle that took place over the admission of Missouri as a
slave state. He called it "a fire bell in the night" that filled him
with terror. It was, he thought, the death knell of the Union,
with the Missouri Compromise being only a temporary reprieve.
Jefferson was quite right. His vision of the coming Civil War was
chillingly prophetic.
We may have heard a little fire bell of our own today. To the extent the
law allows a website like Fairfax Underground to be used as an
instrument for sociopathic aggression - as, it would seem, Cary has
both enabled and permitted "eesh" to do - you are no longer dealing
with questions of "free speech." You're --
MrMISERY
(blurts out)
You're shitting on free speech. And if you love free speech, you don't
shit on it!
REAL JUDGE
Well, I wouldn't have put it quite that way myself, but I think that's
exactly right, "MrMisery"!
SUDDENLY AN OLD MAN
in the back of the court room stands up and begins to clap.
After a few moments, several other courtroom observers do likewise.
MIZ'S MOTHER AND FATHER AND SISTER
begin to applaud.
AS DO THE ATTORNEYS...
the stenographer... the bailiff... and the judge, who casts a beneficient, Harry Carey-like smile on Miz.
CLOSE ON MrMISERY
who seems a bit overwhelmed by this unexpected burst of affirmation.
Perhaps, for a few moments, he might be better described as Mr. Happiness.
CUT TO:
INT. "EESH'S" BEDROOM
"Eesh" sits at his computer taking deep breaths, composing himself. Finally he begins to type.
INSERT - COMPUTER SCREEN
We read "eesh's" words as they are typed.
"EESH'S" TYPEWRITTEN WORDS
I came, I saw, I conquered. Contrary to any rumors you may have
heard, justice triumphed today. I kicked MrMisery and his rich
lawyer's ass. I --
The CLICKING of the keyboard abruptly stops.
Eesh stares at the screen for a moment with a blank expression.
Then suddenly:
"EESH"
FUCK!
With some difficulty, he picks up the monitor, yanking violently at the cords. He finally gets it loose and
hurls it across the room. It crashes into the wall and lands on the floor in a heap. Then he falls back into
his chair, emotionally and psychologically exhausted.
"EESH"
Fuck... Fuck him. Fuck that little shit.
Beat.
"EESH"
FUCK!!!
After a moment, he pulls his cell phone from his pocket, punches in a number, and presses it to his ear.
"EESH"
Cary...?
He starts to cry.
"EESH"
I fucked up. It's bad, really bad.
CUT TO:
INT. CARY'S APARTMENT
The room is completely dark except for the cold blue light of a single computer monitor that Cary sits
in front of. We cannot see his face; he is a black silhouette against the light of the monitor.
For several long moments he says nothing. All we hear is the unnaturally loud, almost Darth Vader-ish
sound of his BREATHING.
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Cary, the judge. This fucking asshole. ...He mentioned your name.
CARY
God damn you, Basl. Do I have to do everything for you? Wipe
your fucking ass?
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Cary, please. I can help you... You know I can help you. Just one
more chance. Please. I will not let you down. I'll kill him if I have --
CARY
Shut. The. Fuck. Up.
(takes a deep breah)
We can't talk about this on the phone. Meet me --
"EESH'S" VOICE
(through Cary's cell phone)
Under the plasma?
CARY
Yes. And bring the Mossberg Chainsaw.
"EESH'S" VOICE
(excited)
The Chainsaw?! You got it, boss. And the horse mask? Can I bring the --
CARY
(cutting him off)
Bring a clown mask. That would be more appropriate.
"EESH'S" VOICE
Boss, please.... I said I was sorry.
CARY
Actually, you didn't. Bring the fucking mask if it makes you happy..
"EESH'S" VOICE
Thank you, Boss, thanks. I --
Cary disconnects, drops the cell into the breast pocket of his short-sleeve, button-down shirt.
We slowly zoom in on Cary's face, deep in thought. The light from the computer monitor has
turned red, giving his features, lit from below, a slightly demonic cast. He purses his lips as
though chewing something sour.
CARY
(almost a whisper)
So be it.
He stands.
CUT TO:
INT. CHUCKHOFFMAN'S SURVEILLANCE ROOM
The room is crowded with a haphazard mix of old-school and cutting edge technology. Chuck is working
a reel-to-reel tape recorder. He reverses the tape with a squealing-jabbering sound. Stops.
He cranks the volume, leans forward, and hits play.
CARY'S VOICE
(over the speakers)
So be it.
He rewinds the tape, plays it again, listening with great concentration.
He stops the tape. Frowns.
He selects a key from the retractable keychain ring clipped to his belt, ulocks the top right drawer
of his desk. He removes a revolver, and a small cardboard box of bullets. He loads the gun methodically,
shuts the chamber with a flip of the wrist, and slips the gun into his pants pocket.
He stands, looking at an old photo of a young woman thumbtacked to the wall. He brushes his thumb
lightly across her cheek.
CHUCK
I'm sorry honey. I know I can never make it right. But if you're up
there, say a little prayer for me. I'm about to do something crazy.
I'm going to kill the devil.
CUT TO:
INT. CLYDE'S, RESTON TOWNE CENTRE
The door swings open.
Enter TheNorthman.
CUT TO:
INT. INKA'S HOT ROD (MOVING)
Inkahootz, right hand firmly on the wheel, trance/hip-hop music BLASTING.
INKA'S LEFT HAND
rests in his lap, loosely holding a nickel-plated revolver.
CUT TO:
EXT./INT. CAR
"Eesh" lies in wait one-half block from the entrance to CLYDE'S.
CUT TO:
EXT. CLYDE'S - LATER
Having received a mysterious invitation via pm from Hoocoodanode, MrMISERY approaches the entrance to Clyde's.
The "spoofed" pm was sent by "eesh," who approaches Miz from behind with the Mossberg.
CUT TO:
EXT. ALLEY
Cary corners "eesh" in a dead-end alley - failure to complete the Miz job spells the end of the line for "eesh".
Cary's CIA handler watches with approval
CUT TO:
INT. APARTMENT
Meanwhile far away in another part of town, the doors and windows have been sealed.
There will be no escape.
CUT TO:
FAIRFAX - 3:00 A.M.
A cold wind blows over the mean streets of Fairfax.
Fade to black.
PS:
Miz gets a happy ending.
Cary develops new and interesting ways of removing "garbarge"
TheNorthman finds his sleep interrupted by disturbing visions. He ages badly.
Chuck receives a mysterious ticket for a luxurious pleasure cruise, upon which, alas, an albatross descends
Inkahootz finds happiness as a carpenter
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
cjKXj
()
Date: March 18, 2015 01:14AM
9K9Ct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you all do realize this shit is anon eesh trying
> to flood the thread with posts that "seem" like
> misery, right?
Still think that's eesh?
-------------------------------------------------------
> you all do realize this shit is anon eesh trying
> to flood the thread with posts that "seem" like
> misery, right?
Still think that's eesh?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
stranger than fiction
()
Date: March 18, 2015 01:30AM
i see what's going on here..someone is posting old mystery novels trying to mix them up with what is obviously mr misery's tales and takes on the case with eesh. a simple search of google pulls up the actual novels and a search of what appears to be mr misery turns up no results. the writing style and picture attachment is completely different.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: March 18, 2015 01:55AM
i think it's funny when everyone is being facetious ..i wouldn't fool with these cats =p
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Anime
()
Date: March 18, 2015 01:57AM
It doesn't matter who's posting what at this point it's all so insane but so damn funny. The shit on on here should be made into a cartoon.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
bjode
()
Date: March 18, 2015 02:40AM
the court transcripts... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The following are the actual courtroom
> transcripts:
>
>
>
> [ open on interior, courtroom, the Judge banging
> her gavel ]
>
> Judge: Mr. Basl, are you ready to give your
> summation?
>
> Basl: [ stepping out] It's just "eesh", if you
> please, your Honor.. and, yes, I'm ready. [
> approaches the jury box ] Ladies and gentlemen of
> the jury, I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice
> and later got thawed out by some of your
> scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me!
> Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make
> me want to get out of my Scion... and run off into
> the hills, or wherever... Sometimes when I get a
> message on Fairfax Underground, I wonder: "Did
> little demons get inside and type it?" I don't
> know! My primitive mind can't grasp these
> concepts. As you can see, I'm but a simple pauper
> with not a dime to his name... I'm just a caveman,
> your honor... VINE will attest to that fact! Look,
> it's printed right here on this strange, thin
> substance you call paper! Furthermore, it says I
> am a victim... and one of your strange and
> unfamiliar modern-day authorities which only
> confuse and confound my primitive caveman
> intellect is on record as corroborating this fact!
> Did tiny demons crawl inside my computer and type
> threatening messages to me, your honor? I don't
> know! I'm just a simple caveman! But this strange
> and confusing authority figure told me personally
> there was probable cause to serve a warrant for
> the plaintiff's arrest and therefore he is without
> a shred of credibility in this vexatious suit...
> this man you modern people call 'maj-i-strit'
> indicated that these possible demon-messages most
> likely came from him, because--LOOK--is that not
> the plaintiff's name signed to this odd and
> confounding demon-message, on this thing you
> modern people call paper?! Did the plaintiff in
> this suit (and the defendant in the case I have
> initiated for these messages) somehow crawl inside
> my simple caveman computer, bypassing my simple
> caveman firewall--and use an overseas proxy to
> threaten me? I don't know! I'm but a simple, poor
> caveman, going to college to study computer
> security and technology... I know nothing of your
> modern world!"
>
>
> [Basl pauses deliberately and begins pacing
> slowly, hands folded behind his back, thoughtfully
> furrowing his pronounced caveman brow; he
> continues...]
>
>
> "...But there is one thing I do know - I have
> NEVER used a proxy server or TOR in order to
> reroute illegal online communications directed
> towards the plaintiff in this case... what is a
> proxy? Is it some strange kind of mammoth? A sun
> god? I am confounded and confused by these issues,
> your honor. Therefore, as an obvious persecuted
> victim of these modern, rich, computer-savvy
> people, I ask you place sanctions on them and
> issue me no less than 10,000 of your modern units
> of currency, so that I may upgrade my desktop
> operating system and purchase a new laptop, as it
> has likely been corrupted by some strange and
> confusing virus due to this entire ordeal. I move
> not only to quash this vexatious suit, but on top
> of my requests for restitution, that (because I am
> but a simple caveman, representing myself, and
> know nothing of your modern legal system) the
> entire family filing this frivolous, vexatious,
> outrageous suit be thrown in jail for life. I have
> spoken to many of what you modern people call
> 'police men', and they all believe and trust me,
> as I am a credible and upstanding citizen who has
> only but once driven over 100 miles in one of your
> modern contraptions known as a 'car' to leave a
> threatening note on the plaintiff's property.
> But... your honor... I mean... come on! [Basl
> looks around, arms outstretched, drinking in the
> judge and jury's support and sympathy] And of
> course, I have used my simple caveman computer to
> state on multiple occasions an intent to stalk the
> party filing suit... but again... come on! I'm but
> a simple caveman. I slipped and fell in some ice
> thousands of years ago... I know nothing of your
> modern world, or proxy servers, or anonymizing
> services, or phishing, or VPN, or IP trackers, or
> IP spoofing, or TOR, or keylogging, or source
> code, or firearms, ammunition, concealed carry
> permits, or sending strange messages to innocent
> parties which display photographs of these things
> called 'fire arms', with notes of their names
> attached, much like the note I so harmlessly
> travelled 100 miles to place at the plaintiff's
> property... are these all just strange gods, or
> magical concepts a simple caveman would know
> nothing about? I don't know, your honor... but I
> assure you I am harmless. And I represent myself,
> here, today, because I am but an indigent,
> downtrodden caveman... I have no money for legal
> council. What is legal council, anyway? Is it a
> strange voodoo ritual I am unaware of? In any
> case, this proves above all else I am the true
> victim here. ...Also, I believe I may have PTSD.
> Thank you.
>
> Judge: The jury will now retire to deliberate.
>
> Jury Foreman: [ standing ] Your Honor.. we don't
> need to retire. Basl's words are just as true now
> as they were in his time. We give him the full
> amount, place sanctions, and declare the moving
> party a menace to society and sentence the lot of
> them to life imprisonment for persecuting such a
> poor, unfortunate, confused man who knows nothing
> of our modern world or technology. Furthermore, we
> commend Mr. Basl's bravery in facing these bullies
> and in advocating for himself. We also understand
> that, when the victimization became too much for
> him too handle, he found VINE especially useful.
>
> [ the jury applauds Basl, who is absently focused
> on his iPhone, chuckling at a Meade Skelton video
> on Youtube ]
>
> Judge: Did you hear that, Mr. Basl?
>
> Basl: [ iPhone now to his ear ] Hang on a second..
> [ to the judge ] I-I'm sorry, your Honor. I was
> listening to the magic voices coming out of this
> strange modern invention! [ gives a surreptitious
> 'thumbs up' to lizzie and Cary, both seated
> inconspicuously at the back row; smiles
> maliciously to the camera ]
>
> Announcer: This has been "Unfrozen Caveman
> Lawyer". Join us next week... at 5am, in your
> driveway, for another episode.
>
> /
Wanted to read, but the large blocks of print hurt the brain. Sorry.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The following are the actual courtroom
> transcripts:
>
>
>
> [ open on interior, courtroom, the Judge banging
> her gavel ]
>
> Judge: Mr. Basl, are you ready to give your
> summation?
>
> Basl: [ stepping out] It's just "eesh", if you
> please, your Honor.. and, yes, I'm ready. [
> approaches the jury box ] Ladies and gentlemen of
> the jury, I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice
> and later got thawed out by some of your
> scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me!
> Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make
> me want to get out of my Scion... and run off into
> the hills, or wherever... Sometimes when I get a
> message on Fairfax Underground, I wonder: "Did
> little demons get inside and type it?" I don't
> know! My primitive mind can't grasp these
> concepts. As you can see, I'm but a simple pauper
> with not a dime to his name... I'm just a caveman,
> your honor... VINE will attest to that fact! Look,
> it's printed right here on this strange, thin
> substance you call paper! Furthermore, it says I
> am a victim... and one of your strange and
> unfamiliar modern-day authorities which only
> confuse and confound my primitive caveman
> intellect is on record as corroborating this fact!
> Did tiny demons crawl inside my computer and type
> threatening messages to me, your honor? I don't
> know! I'm just a simple caveman! But this strange
> and confusing authority figure told me personally
> there was probable cause to serve a warrant for
> the plaintiff's arrest and therefore he is without
> a shred of credibility in this vexatious suit...
> this man you modern people call 'maj-i-strit'
> indicated that these possible demon-messages most
> likely came from him, because--LOOK--is that not
> the plaintiff's name signed to this odd and
> confounding demon-message, on this thing you
> modern people call paper?! Did the plaintiff in
> this suit (and the defendant in the case I have
> initiated for these messages) somehow crawl inside
> my simple caveman computer, bypassing my simple
> caveman firewall--and use an overseas proxy to
> threaten me? I don't know! I'm but a simple, poor
> caveman, going to college to study computer
> security and technology... I know nothing of your
> modern world!"
>
>
> [Basl pauses deliberately and begins pacing
> slowly, hands folded behind his back, thoughtfully
> furrowing his pronounced caveman brow; he
> continues...]
>
>
> "...But there is one thing I do know - I have
> NEVER used a proxy server or TOR in order to
> reroute illegal online communications directed
> towards the plaintiff in this case... what is a
> proxy? Is it some strange kind of mammoth? A sun
> god? I am confounded and confused by these issues,
> your honor. Therefore, as an obvious persecuted
> victim of these modern, rich, computer-savvy
> people, I ask you place sanctions on them and
> issue me no less than 10,000 of your modern units
> of currency, so that I may upgrade my desktop
> operating system and purchase a new laptop, as it
> has likely been corrupted by some strange and
> confusing virus due to this entire ordeal. I move
> not only to quash this vexatious suit, but on top
> of my requests for restitution, that (because I am
> but a simple caveman, representing myself, and
> know nothing of your modern legal system) the
> entire family filing this frivolous, vexatious,
> outrageous suit be thrown in jail for life. I have
> spoken to many of what you modern people call
> 'police men', and they all believe and trust me,
> as I am a credible and upstanding citizen who has
> only but once driven over 100 miles in one of your
> modern contraptions known as a 'car' to leave a
> threatening note on the plaintiff's property.
> But... your honor... I mean... come on! [Basl
> looks around, arms outstretched, drinking in the
> judge and jury's support and sympathy] And of
> course, I have used my simple caveman computer to
> state on multiple occasions an intent to stalk the
> party filing suit... but again... come on! I'm but
> a simple caveman. I slipped and fell in some ice
> thousands of years ago... I know nothing of your
> modern world, or proxy servers, or anonymizing
> services, or phishing, or VPN, or IP trackers, or
> IP spoofing, or TOR, or keylogging, or source
> code, or firearms, ammunition, concealed carry
> permits, or sending strange messages to innocent
> parties which display photographs of these things
> called 'fire arms', with notes of their names
> attached, much like the note I so harmlessly
> travelled 100 miles to place at the plaintiff's
> property... are these all just strange gods, or
> magical concepts a simple caveman would know
> nothing about? I don't know, your honor... but I
> assure you I am harmless. And I represent myself,
> here, today, because I am but an indigent,
> downtrodden caveman... I have no money for legal
> council. What is legal council, anyway? Is it a
> strange voodoo ritual I am unaware of? In any
> case, this proves above all else I am the true
> victim here. ...Also, I believe I may have PTSD.
> Thank you.
>
> Judge: The jury will now retire to deliberate.
>
> Jury Foreman: [ standing ] Your Honor.. we don't
> need to retire. Basl's words are just as true now
> as they were in his time. We give him the full
> amount, place sanctions, and declare the moving
> party a menace to society and sentence the lot of
> them to life imprisonment for persecuting such a
> poor, unfortunate, confused man who knows nothing
> of our modern world or technology. Furthermore, we
> commend Mr. Basl's bravery in facing these bullies
> and in advocating for himself. We also understand
> that, when the victimization became too much for
> him too handle, he found VINE especially useful.
>
> [ the jury applauds Basl, who is absently focused
> on his iPhone, chuckling at a Meade Skelton video
> on Youtube ]
>
> Judge: Did you hear that, Mr. Basl?
>
> Basl: [ iPhone now to his ear ] Hang on a second..
> [ to the judge ] I-I'm sorry, your Honor. I was
> listening to the magic voices coming out of this
> strange modern invention! [ gives a surreptitious
> 'thumbs up' to lizzie and Cary, both seated
> inconspicuously at the back row; smiles
> maliciously to the camera ]
>
> Announcer: This has been "Unfrozen Caveman
> Lawyer". Join us next week... at 5am, in your
> driveway, for another episode.
>
> /
Wanted to read, but the large blocks of print hurt the brain. Sorry.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
read every word
()
Date: March 18, 2015 02:43AM
Proxy Hopper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Bravo!
-------------------------------------------------------
Bravo!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WeLvC
()
Date: March 18, 2015 03:03AM
cjKXj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 9K9Ct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > you all do realize this shit is anon eesh
> trying
> > to flood the thread with posts that "seem" like
> > misery, right?
>
>
> Still think that's eesh?
yes, what better way to take the focus off himself and onto misery
even me posting just my response is another post AWAY from the original topic
definitely eesh
-------------------------------------------------------
> 9K9Ct Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > you all do realize this shit is anon eesh
> trying
> > to flood the thread with posts that "seem" like
> > misery, right?
>
>
> Still think that's eesh?
yes, what better way to take the focus off himself and onto misery
even me posting just my response is another post AWAY from the original topic
definitely eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
For sure
()
Date: March 18, 2015 03:35AM
One is Miz for sure
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cary and Eesh in "Teamwork!"
()
Date: March 18, 2015 09:55AM
TEAMWORK!
by Frank Jackdaw
An eesh was hacking at my feet.
It had already torn my boots and stockings to shreds, now it was hacking at the feet themselves.
Again and again it struck at them, then circled several times restlessly round me, then returned to continue its work.
Cary passed by, looked on for a while, then asked me why I suffered the eesh.
"I'm helpless," I said. "When it came and began to attack me, I of course tried to drive it away, even to strangle it, but these animals are very strong, it was about to spring at my face, but I preferred to sacrifice my feet. Now they are almost torn to bits."
"Fancy letting yourself be tortured like this!" said Cary. "One shot and that's the end of the eesh."
"Really?" I said. "And would you do that?"
"With pleasure," said Cary, "I've only got to go home and get my gun. Could you wait another half hour?"
"I'm not sure about that," said I, and stood for a moment rigid with pain. Then I said: "Do try in any case, please."
"Very well," said Cary, "I'll be as quick as I can."
During this conversation the eesh had been calmly listening, letting its eye rove between me and Cary.
Now I realized that it had understood everything.
It took wing, leaned far back to gain impetus, and then, like a javelin thrower, thrust its beak through my mouth, deep into me.
Falling back, I was relieved to feel him drowning irretrievably in my blood, which was filling every depth, flooding every shore.
Pic unrelated.
Attachments:
Cary arrives home from work!
LATER THAT DAY:
Cary and "Eesh" exchange "high fives"! It's been another great day!
by Frank Jackdaw
An eesh was hacking at my feet.
It had already torn my boots and stockings to shreds, now it was hacking at the feet themselves.
Again and again it struck at them, then circled several times restlessly round me, then returned to continue its work.
Cary passed by, looked on for a while, then asked me why I suffered the eesh.
"I'm helpless," I said. "When it came and began to attack me, I of course tried to drive it away, even to strangle it, but these animals are very strong, it was about to spring at my face, but I preferred to sacrifice my feet. Now they are almost torn to bits."
"Fancy letting yourself be tortured like this!" said Cary. "One shot and that's the end of the eesh."
"Really?" I said. "And would you do that?"
"With pleasure," said Cary, "I've only got to go home and get my gun. Could you wait another half hour?"
"I'm not sure about that," said I, and stood for a moment rigid with pain. Then I said: "Do try in any case, please."
"Very well," said Cary, "I'll be as quick as I can."
During this conversation the eesh had been calmly listening, letting its eye rove between me and Cary.
Now I realized that it had understood everything.
It took wing, leaned far back to gain impetus, and then, like a javelin thrower, thrust its beak through my mouth, deep into me.
Falling back, I was relieved to feel him drowning irretrievably in my blood, which was filling every depth, flooding every shore.
Pic unrelated.
Attachments:
Cary arrives home from work!
LATER THAT DAY:
Cary and "Eesh" exchange "high fives"! It's been another great day!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Still not Misrey
()
Date: March 18, 2015 09:58AM
Aw, now he's trying even harder. Look at him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
^po widdle eesh!
()
Date: March 18, 2015 10:17AM
He's adorbs!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Int. Monologue 17/ Mr. Kravitz
()
Date: March 18, 2015 11:41AM
DRUNKS AND CHILDREN
(Interior Monologue No. 17)
What was spoken to me, I knew to be the truth. A crazy story about the sanctity and true nature of the human appendix. A useless protrusion of tissue that, according to my storyteller, the little round man who looked like a clean-shaven mole-- was the one true answer to everything. The problem came in divining just what truth—-or rather, whose truth it was, exactly, that I’d been told. The round, hairless mole man seemed liked good enough people, but somehow I had the spidey-sense to think twice before buying a weird story in full faith and credit told to me by a human mole...
For the life of me, I couldn’t begin to answer the question that had become-- in revision-- prologue to my current story. What began as a simple journey home had now become a journey to unravel and comprehend the existence of home—any home—as a place from which I logically must have strayed. The simple truth, that I had been a troubled businessman who’d lost his way—strayed from the road he’d known and trusted to get him home everyday and instead found a place and a predicament of uncertain proportions—this simple truth had in time been replaced, or corrected; amended or elaborated, perhaps, by the newer truth. An overlapping truth.
I recall the saying that goes something like this: “only drunks and children speak the truth.” It was appropriate, then, that the truth I’d found myself at odds with also seemed no more coherent than the slurred words of my uncle the hayseed, who so often was fond of boasting in his inebriated machismo to have a mastery of the martial arts.
It could be taken as truth, after a fashion--that claim of deadly intimidation—that his ham hands had in any way the dexterity inscribed in their damaged and dropsy-filled nerves the skill to pull off the impossible. That he could drop ten men in one fell swoop of a roundhouse kick, or force his random adversary into submission with the steady chokehold of some G.I. Joe Kung-Fu grip.
That was certainly not fact, however. Not empirically, it would seem.
But, in truth, as far as my limited mental resources could recall, that drunken hayseed uncle of mine certainly did fell many the opponent at the empty ham hands of a drunken bluff. There was something to be said for that. Empirically. He didn’t need a weapon, in the end, to fell his adversary. It was something internal, and drunken or shit-faced as it may have been, quite remarkable. A drunken master, one who'd never so much as come within 50 feet of the remotest possibility of a physical altercation. As a certain species of truth, deadlier than Bruce Lee.
"Yep, I could beat up a tiger," he'd say many a time after downing 8 or 9 Pabst Blue Ribbons. When I was a dumb kid, sitting on the spare cinderblock next to the front porch (the other four cinder blocks of course firmly propping up the rusted out Chevy out in the front lawn), well, when I was sitting on that cinder block certain brisk summer nights, my uncle the hayseed had no doubt bested more than a few tigers in his time. In my child's mind, anyway. A drunken hayseed will brag at least once in his life he has the physical prowess to beat a tiger in a fist-fight. Fact.
And, When a hayseed is drunk and tells a drunken hayseed lie to a child, that lie may as well be scripture. When the phenomenon of nostalgia intervenes, you could rightly say (after a few Pabsts, perhaps) that even as a grown, sober man, I still sit on that same cinder block, and that my hayseed uncle had in fact beat up a tiger or two. Sober as a judge, I could still buy it...in a certain light. If a lie is true enough for a drunk and a child, it may as well be true in fact. A tree falling in the woods sorta thing. After all, who does the fact-checking here...? Absent a sober judge, the very meaning of the word 'truth' can very quickly boil down to alcohol, boxing tigers and kung-fu...
In any case, the truth I speak of now had rather to do with the mole man’s bedside monologue on waste and altruism, and the sanctity of the human appendix. The apparent worship of the useless. Without the slightest mental swerving, I’d fallen into thinking, maybe, this whole thing was just some big misunderstanding. Maybe the mole man’s truth would turn out to reconcile with the one I’d held tight for so long. Maybe things would make sense, in the end.
I’d have to temper any inclination towards diplomacy, however, with my uncorrelated and isolated memory of a drunken hayseed uncle who could slay the beast with only the power of his booze-drowned mind. Our long journey to our now as ever unnamed and unproven destination had gone on for the length of my thoughts on the reliability of drunks and children. It’s true, children tend more often than not to say whatever passes through their little heads, and the things they say are often untrue. Children lie. Just like drunks.
But within a lie, from either the mouths of babes or winos, there is a certainty, at least, of honesty. A true lie—one that speaks slovenly to another that you could kick his ass with some sweet Kung Fu moves, or that you didn’t break the vase when you did—is one that regardless of truth in facts is honest, above all; and in the end, truthful to the intentions and calculations of human nature.
Which, I can only assume, is at its most truthful when it's at its crazed and drunken worst. Never mind the tigers or the kung-fu.
DISPLACEMENT/MISPLACEMENT/REPLACEMENT
(Mr. Kravitz’ Story Concluded)
The caller at his door that late afternoon turned out to be no more than a traveling salesman. Kravitz couldn’t quite pin down the true nature of the caller’s business, but probably it was some middle aged virgin going around selling God. Jehovah’s Witness, or some such nonsense. In any case, the old man’s judgment in this instance was correct. The city council hadn’t come by since that day on the porch. They’d revealed as much, in their yellow hardhats and white button-down shirts, that Mr. Kravitz’ next inconvenience would no longer see fit to afford any such courtesy. And so it was. Mr. Kravitz went back to his bed, finished applying his Ben-Gay, and after some considerable time, fell into a geriatric spell of unconsciousness (it was all too inaccurate—taunting, even—to call the passing of any time in bed ‘sleep’).
When he’d at length regained what little consciousness still remained, Kravitz was in a different place. A different time. His usual cat-like nap had apparently been instead a deep and murky slumber. It wasn’t the same time of day. Not at all. Maybe not even the same time of the week, or month, or year. Bedridden, Kravitz made only as if to reach for his plastic urinal, then ceased any further movement. He didn’t have any piss left in him at the moment. It was uncertain, among many other things, that he’d ever have anymore piss in him. At least, his inability to piss and do so knowingly had conveyed that effect.
The work order sat anchored down by a tall glass of water next to him. Though he couldn’t see it—didn’t know it—it was there. Paid in full, the State kept its promise. Underneath his paper bedclothes, there was the slight cool of metal. When it came to him finally to lift his face, the only thing before him appeared to be a large, fat woman, with a white outfit and a paper hat, lifting up the metal bedpan and taking a brief look inside the bowl. But by that time, he was already too tired to care.
/
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:18PM by Cary.
Attachments:
(Interior Monologue No. 17)
What was spoken to me, I knew to be the truth. A crazy story about the sanctity and true nature of the human appendix. A useless protrusion of tissue that, according to my storyteller, the little round man who looked like a clean-shaven mole-- was the one true answer to everything. The problem came in divining just what truth—-or rather, whose truth it was, exactly, that I’d been told. The round, hairless mole man seemed liked good enough people, but somehow I had the spidey-sense to think twice before buying a weird story in full faith and credit told to me by a human mole...
For the life of me, I couldn’t begin to answer the question that had become-- in revision-- prologue to my current story. What began as a simple journey home had now become a journey to unravel and comprehend the existence of home—any home—as a place from which I logically must have strayed. The simple truth, that I had been a troubled businessman who’d lost his way—strayed from the road he’d known and trusted to get him home everyday and instead found a place and a predicament of uncertain proportions—this simple truth had in time been replaced, or corrected; amended or elaborated, perhaps, by the newer truth. An overlapping truth.
I recall the saying that goes something like this: “only drunks and children speak the truth.” It was appropriate, then, that the truth I’d found myself at odds with also seemed no more coherent than the slurred words of my uncle the hayseed, who so often was fond of boasting in his inebriated machismo to have a mastery of the martial arts.
It could be taken as truth, after a fashion--that claim of deadly intimidation—that his ham hands had in any way the dexterity inscribed in their damaged and dropsy-filled nerves the skill to pull off the impossible. That he could drop ten men in one fell swoop of a roundhouse kick, or force his random adversary into submission with the steady chokehold of some G.I. Joe Kung-Fu grip.
That was certainly not fact, however. Not empirically, it would seem.
But, in truth, as far as my limited mental resources could recall, that drunken hayseed uncle of mine certainly did fell many the opponent at the empty ham hands of a drunken bluff. There was something to be said for that. Empirically. He didn’t need a weapon, in the end, to fell his adversary. It was something internal, and drunken or shit-faced as it may have been, quite remarkable. A drunken master, one who'd never so much as come within 50 feet of the remotest possibility of a physical altercation. As a certain species of truth, deadlier than Bruce Lee.
"Yep, I could beat up a tiger," he'd say many a time after downing 8 or 9 Pabst Blue Ribbons. When I was a dumb kid, sitting on the spare cinderblock next to the front porch (the other four cinder blocks of course firmly propping up the rusted out Chevy out in the front lawn), well, when I was sitting on that cinder block certain brisk summer nights, my uncle the hayseed had no doubt bested more than a few tigers in his time. In my child's mind, anyway. A drunken hayseed will brag at least once in his life he has the physical prowess to beat a tiger in a fist-fight. Fact.
And, When a hayseed is drunk and tells a drunken hayseed lie to a child, that lie may as well be scripture. When the phenomenon of nostalgia intervenes, you could rightly say (after a few Pabsts, perhaps) that even as a grown, sober man, I still sit on that same cinder block, and that my hayseed uncle had in fact beat up a tiger or two. Sober as a judge, I could still buy it...in a certain light. If a lie is true enough for a drunk and a child, it may as well be true in fact. A tree falling in the woods sorta thing. After all, who does the fact-checking here...? Absent a sober judge, the very meaning of the word 'truth' can very quickly boil down to alcohol, boxing tigers and kung-fu...
In any case, the truth I speak of now had rather to do with the mole man’s bedside monologue on waste and altruism, and the sanctity of the human appendix. The apparent worship of the useless. Without the slightest mental swerving, I’d fallen into thinking, maybe, this whole thing was just some big misunderstanding. Maybe the mole man’s truth would turn out to reconcile with the one I’d held tight for so long. Maybe things would make sense, in the end.
I’d have to temper any inclination towards diplomacy, however, with my uncorrelated and isolated memory of a drunken hayseed uncle who could slay the beast with only the power of his booze-drowned mind. Our long journey to our now as ever unnamed and unproven destination had gone on for the length of my thoughts on the reliability of drunks and children. It’s true, children tend more often than not to say whatever passes through their little heads, and the things they say are often untrue. Children lie. Just like drunks.
But within a lie, from either the mouths of babes or winos, there is a certainty, at least, of honesty. A true lie—one that speaks slovenly to another that you could kick his ass with some sweet Kung Fu moves, or that you didn’t break the vase when you did—is one that regardless of truth in facts is honest, above all; and in the end, truthful to the intentions and calculations of human nature.
Which, I can only assume, is at its most truthful when it's at its crazed and drunken worst. Never mind the tigers or the kung-fu.
DISPLACEMENT/MISPLACEMENT/REPLACEMENT
(Mr. Kravitz’ Story Concluded)
The caller at his door that late afternoon turned out to be no more than a traveling salesman. Kravitz couldn’t quite pin down the true nature of the caller’s business, but probably it was some middle aged virgin going around selling God. Jehovah’s Witness, or some such nonsense. In any case, the old man’s judgment in this instance was correct. The city council hadn’t come by since that day on the porch. They’d revealed as much, in their yellow hardhats and white button-down shirts, that Mr. Kravitz’ next inconvenience would no longer see fit to afford any such courtesy. And so it was. Mr. Kravitz went back to his bed, finished applying his Ben-Gay, and after some considerable time, fell into a geriatric spell of unconsciousness (it was all too inaccurate—taunting, even—to call the passing of any time in bed ‘sleep’).
When he’d at length regained what little consciousness still remained, Kravitz was in a different place. A different time. His usual cat-like nap had apparently been instead a deep and murky slumber. It wasn’t the same time of day. Not at all. Maybe not even the same time of the week, or month, or year. Bedridden, Kravitz made only as if to reach for his plastic urinal, then ceased any further movement. He didn’t have any piss left in him at the moment. It was uncertain, among many other things, that he’d ever have anymore piss in him. At least, his inability to piss and do so knowingly had conveyed that effect.
The work order sat anchored down by a tall glass of water next to him. Though he couldn’t see it—didn’t know it—it was there. Paid in full, the State kept its promise. Underneath his paper bedclothes, there was the slight cool of metal. When it came to him finally to lift his face, the only thing before him appeared to be a large, fat woman, with a white outfit and a paper hat, lifting up the metal bedpan and taking a brief look inside the bowl. But by that time, he was already too tired to care.
/
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:18PM by Cary.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Comedy gold
()
Date: March 18, 2015 11:44AM
This tactic isn't working anymore. Most people know now to just ignore those post and read the actual Mr. Misery trial mockery posts. Those are comedy gold! Keep them coming!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Best short story ever...
()
Date: March 18, 2015 03:25PM
For sale. One pair baby shoes. Never used.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Like a toddler's ass
()
Date: March 18, 2015 05:43PM
Best short story ever... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For sale. One pair baby shoes. Never used.
Just slightly abused
-------------------------------------------------------
> For sale. One pair baby shoes. Never used.
Just slightly abused
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
awaiting eesh appearance
()
Date: March 18, 2015 07:13PM
has it been 10 days?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
No-Spin Zone
()
Date: March 18, 2015 07:39PM
Locked up? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where's Eesh?
Matter of public record: eesh filed a protective order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
People knew this, right?
To answer your question...no way to spin this loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low hoping no one would notice.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where's Eesh?
Matter of public record: eesh filed a protective order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
People knew this, right?
To answer your question...no way to spin this loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low hoping no one would notice.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Robert W. Service
()
Date: March 18, 2015 08:07PM
The Atavist -- by Robert W. Service
What are you doing here, Tom Thorne, on the white top-knot o' the world,
Where the wind has the cut of a naked knife and the stars are rapier keen?
Hugging a smudgy willow fire, deep in a lynx robe curled,
You that's a lord's own son, Tom Thorne — what does your madness mean?
Go home, go home to your clubs, Tom Thorne! home to your evening dress!
Home to your place of power and pride, and the feast that waits for you!
Why do you linger all alone in the splendid emptiness,
Scouring the Land of the Little Sticks on the trail of the caribou?
Why did you fall off the Earth, Tom Thorne, out of our social ken?
What did your deep damnation prove? What was your dark despair?
Oh with the width of a world between, and years to the count of ten,
If they cut out your heart to-night, Tom Thorne,
HER name would be graven there!
And you fled afar for the thing called Peace,
and you thought you would find it here,
In the purple tundras vastly spread, and the mountains whitely piled;
It's a weary quest and a dreary quest, but I think that the end is near;
For they say that the Lord has hidden it in the secret heart of the Wild.
And you know that heart as few men know, and your eyes are fey and deep,
With a "something lost" come welling back from the raw, red dawn of life:
With woe and pain have you greatly lain, till out of abysmal sleep
The soul of the Stone Age leaps in you, alert for the ancient strife.
And if you came to our feast again, with its pomp and glee and glow,
I think you would sit stone-still, Tom Thorne, and see in a daze of dream,
A mad sun goading to frenzied flame the glittering gems of the snow,
And a monster musk-ox bulking black against the blood-red gleam.
I think you would see berg-battling shores, and stammer and halt and stare,
With a sudden sense of the frozen void, serene and vast and still;
And the aching gleam and the hush of dream,
and the track of a great white bear,
And the primal lust that surged in you as you sprang to make your kill.
I think you would hear the bull-moose call, and the glutted river roar;
And spy the hosts of the caribou shadow the shining plain;
And feel the pulse of the Silences, and stand elate once more
On the verge of the yawning vastitudes that call to you in vain.
For I think you are one with the stars and the sun,
and the wind and the wave and the dew;
And the peaks untrod that yearn to God, and the valleys undefiled;
Men soar with wings, and they bridle kings, but what is it all to you,
Wise in the ways of the wilderness, and strong with the strength of the Wild?
You have spent your life, you have waged your strife
where never we play a part;
You have held the throne of the Great Unknown, you have ruled a kingdom vast:
. . . . .
BUT TO-NIGHT THERE'S A STRANGE, NEW TRAIL FOR YOU, AND YOU GO, O WEARY HEART!
TO THE PEACE AND REST OF THE GREAT UNGUESSED . . .
AT LAST, TOM THORNE, AT LAST.
What are you doing here, Tom Thorne, on the white top-knot o' the world,
Where the wind has the cut of a naked knife and the stars are rapier keen?
Hugging a smudgy willow fire, deep in a lynx robe curled,
You that's a lord's own son, Tom Thorne — what does your madness mean?
Go home, go home to your clubs, Tom Thorne! home to your evening dress!
Home to your place of power and pride, and the feast that waits for you!
Why do you linger all alone in the splendid emptiness,
Scouring the Land of the Little Sticks on the trail of the caribou?
Why did you fall off the Earth, Tom Thorne, out of our social ken?
What did your deep damnation prove? What was your dark despair?
Oh with the width of a world between, and years to the count of ten,
If they cut out your heart to-night, Tom Thorne,
HER name would be graven there!
And you fled afar for the thing called Peace,
and you thought you would find it here,
In the purple tundras vastly spread, and the mountains whitely piled;
It's a weary quest and a dreary quest, but I think that the end is near;
For they say that the Lord has hidden it in the secret heart of the Wild.
And you know that heart as few men know, and your eyes are fey and deep,
With a "something lost" come welling back from the raw, red dawn of life:
With woe and pain have you greatly lain, till out of abysmal sleep
The soul of the Stone Age leaps in you, alert for the ancient strife.
And if you came to our feast again, with its pomp and glee and glow,
I think you would sit stone-still, Tom Thorne, and see in a daze of dream,
A mad sun goading to frenzied flame the glittering gems of the snow,
And a monster musk-ox bulking black against the blood-red gleam.
I think you would see berg-battling shores, and stammer and halt and stare,
With a sudden sense of the frozen void, serene and vast and still;
And the aching gleam and the hush of dream,
and the track of a great white bear,
And the primal lust that surged in you as you sprang to make your kill.
I think you would hear the bull-moose call, and the glutted river roar;
And spy the hosts of the caribou shadow the shining plain;
And feel the pulse of the Silences, and stand elate once more
On the verge of the yawning vastitudes that call to you in vain.
For I think you are one with the stars and the sun,
and the wind and the wave and the dew;
And the peaks untrod that yearn to God, and the valleys undefiled;
Men soar with wings, and they bridle kings, but what is it all to you,
Wise in the ways of the wilderness, and strong with the strength of the Wild?
You have spent your life, you have waged your strife
where never we play a part;
You have held the throne of the Great Unknown, you have ruled a kingdom vast:
. . . . .
BUT TO-NIGHT THERE'S A STRANGE, NEW TRAIL FOR YOU, AND YOU GO, O WEARY HEART!
TO THE PEACE AND REST OF THE GREAT UNGUESSED . . .
AT LAST, TOM THORNE, AT LAST.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Robert W. Service
()
Date: March 18, 2015 08:07PM
Barb-Wire Bill-- by Robert W. Service
At dawn of day the white land lay all gruesome-like and grim,
When Bill Mc'Gee he says to me: "We've GOT to do it, Jim.
We've got to make Fort Liard quick. I know the river's bad,
But, oh! the little woman's sick . . . why! don't you savvy, lad?"
And me! Well, yes, I must confess it wasn't hard to see
Their little family group of two would soon be one of three.
And so I answered, careless-like: "Why, Bill! you don't suppose
I'm scared of that there 'babbling brook'? Whatever you say — goes."
A real live man was Barb-wire Bill, with insides copper-lined;
For "barb-wire" was the brand of "hooch" to which he most inclined.
They knew him far; his igloos are on Kittiegazuit strand.
They knew him well, the tribes who dwell within the Barren Land.
From Koyokuk to Kuskoquim his fame was everywhere;
And he did love, all life above, that little Julie Claire,
The lithe, white slave-girl he had bought for seven hundred skins,
And taken to his wickiup to make his moccasins.
We crawled down to the river bank and feeble folk were we,
That Julie Claire from God-knows-where, and Barb-wire Bill and me.
From shore to shore we heard the roar the heaving ice-floes make,
And loud we laughed, and launched our raft, and followed in their wake.
The river swept and seethed and leapt, and caught us in its stride;
And on we hurled amid a world that crashed on every side.
With sullen din the banks caved in; the shore-ice lanced the stream;
The naked floes like spooks arose, all jiggling and agleam.
Black anchor-ice of strange device shot upward from its bed,
As night and day we cleft our way, and arrow-like we sped.
But "Faster still!" cried Barb-wire Bill, and looked the live-long day
In dull despair at Julie Claire, as white like death she lay.
And sometimes he would seem to pray and sometimes seem to curse,
And bent above, with eyes of love, yet ever she grew worse.
And as we plunged and leapt and lunged, her face was plucked with pain,
And I could feel his nerves of steel a-quiver at the strain.
And in the night he gripped me tight as I lay fast asleep:
"The river's kicking like a steer . . . run out the forward sweep!
That's Hell-gate Canyon right ahead; I know of old its roar,
And . . . I'll be damned! THE ICE IS JAMMED! We've GOT to make the shore."
With one wild leap I gripped the sweep. The night was black as sin.
The float-ice crashed and ripped and smashed, and stunned us with its din.
And near and near, and clear and clear I heard the canyon boom;
And swift and strong we swept along to meet our awful doom.
And as with dread I glimpsed ahead the death that waited there,
My only thought was of the girl, the little Julie Claire;
And so, like demon mad with fear, I panted at the oar,
And foot by foot, and inch by inch, we worked the raft ashore.
The bank was staked with grinding ice, and as we scraped and crashed,
I only knew one thing to do, and through my mind it flashed:
Yet while I groped to find the rope, I heard Bill's savage cry:
"That's my job, lad! It's me that jumps. I'll snub this raft or die!"
I saw him leap, I saw him creep, I saw him gain the land;
I saw him crawl, I saw him fall, then run with rope in hand.
And then the darkness gulped him up, and down we dashed once more,
And nearer, nearer drew the jam, and thunder-like its roar.
Oh God! all's lost . . . from Julie Claire there came a wail of pain,
And then — the rope grew sudden taut, and quivered at the strain;
It slacked and slipped, it whined and gripped, and oh, I held my breath!
And there we hung and there we swung right in the jaws of death.
A little strand of hempen rope, and how I watched it there,
With all around a hell of sound, and darkness and despair;
A little strand of hempen rope, I watched it all alone,
And somewhere in the dark behind I heard a woman moan;
And somewhere in the dark ahead I heard a man cry out,
Then silence, silence, silence fell, and mocked my hollow shout.
And yet once more from out the shore I heard that cry of pain,
A moan of mortal agony, then all was still again.
That night was hell with all the frills, and when the dawn broke dim,
I saw a lean and level land, but never sign of him.
I saw a flat and frozen shore of hideous device,
I saw a long-drawn strand of rope that vanished through the ice.
And on that treeless, rockless shore I found my partner — dead.
No place was there to snub the raft, so — HE HAD SERVED INSTEAD;
And with the rope lashed round his waist, in last defiant fight,
He'd thrown himself beneath the ice, that closed and gripped him tight;
And there he'd held us back from death, as fast in death he lay. . . .
Say, boys! I'm not the pious brand, but — I just tried to pray.
And then I looked to Julie Claire, and sore abashed was I,
For from the robes that covered her, I — HEARD — A — BABY — CRY. . . .
Thus was Love conqueror of death, and life for life was given;
And though no saint on earth, d'ye think —
Bill's squared hisself with Heaven?
At dawn of day the white land lay all gruesome-like and grim,
When Bill Mc'Gee he says to me: "We've GOT to do it, Jim.
We've got to make Fort Liard quick. I know the river's bad,
But, oh! the little woman's sick . . . why! don't you savvy, lad?"
And me! Well, yes, I must confess it wasn't hard to see
Their little family group of two would soon be one of three.
And so I answered, careless-like: "Why, Bill! you don't suppose
I'm scared of that there 'babbling brook'? Whatever you say — goes."
A real live man was Barb-wire Bill, with insides copper-lined;
For "barb-wire" was the brand of "hooch" to which he most inclined.
They knew him far; his igloos are on Kittiegazuit strand.
They knew him well, the tribes who dwell within the Barren Land.
From Koyokuk to Kuskoquim his fame was everywhere;
And he did love, all life above, that little Julie Claire,
The lithe, white slave-girl he had bought for seven hundred skins,
And taken to his wickiup to make his moccasins.
We crawled down to the river bank and feeble folk were we,
That Julie Claire from God-knows-where, and Barb-wire Bill and me.
From shore to shore we heard the roar the heaving ice-floes make,
And loud we laughed, and launched our raft, and followed in their wake.
The river swept and seethed and leapt, and caught us in its stride;
And on we hurled amid a world that crashed on every side.
With sullen din the banks caved in; the shore-ice lanced the stream;
The naked floes like spooks arose, all jiggling and agleam.
Black anchor-ice of strange device shot upward from its bed,
As night and day we cleft our way, and arrow-like we sped.
But "Faster still!" cried Barb-wire Bill, and looked the live-long day
In dull despair at Julie Claire, as white like death she lay.
And sometimes he would seem to pray and sometimes seem to curse,
And bent above, with eyes of love, yet ever she grew worse.
And as we plunged and leapt and lunged, her face was plucked with pain,
And I could feel his nerves of steel a-quiver at the strain.
And in the night he gripped me tight as I lay fast asleep:
"The river's kicking like a steer . . . run out the forward sweep!
That's Hell-gate Canyon right ahead; I know of old its roar,
And . . . I'll be damned! THE ICE IS JAMMED! We've GOT to make the shore."
With one wild leap I gripped the sweep. The night was black as sin.
The float-ice crashed and ripped and smashed, and stunned us with its din.
And near and near, and clear and clear I heard the canyon boom;
And swift and strong we swept along to meet our awful doom.
And as with dread I glimpsed ahead the death that waited there,
My only thought was of the girl, the little Julie Claire;
And so, like demon mad with fear, I panted at the oar,
And foot by foot, and inch by inch, we worked the raft ashore.
The bank was staked with grinding ice, and as we scraped and crashed,
I only knew one thing to do, and through my mind it flashed:
Yet while I groped to find the rope, I heard Bill's savage cry:
"That's my job, lad! It's me that jumps. I'll snub this raft or die!"
I saw him leap, I saw him creep, I saw him gain the land;
I saw him crawl, I saw him fall, then run with rope in hand.
And then the darkness gulped him up, and down we dashed once more,
And nearer, nearer drew the jam, and thunder-like its roar.
Oh God! all's lost . . . from Julie Claire there came a wail of pain,
And then — the rope grew sudden taut, and quivered at the strain;
It slacked and slipped, it whined and gripped, and oh, I held my breath!
And there we hung and there we swung right in the jaws of death.
A little strand of hempen rope, and how I watched it there,
With all around a hell of sound, and darkness and despair;
A little strand of hempen rope, I watched it all alone,
And somewhere in the dark behind I heard a woman moan;
And somewhere in the dark ahead I heard a man cry out,
Then silence, silence, silence fell, and mocked my hollow shout.
And yet once more from out the shore I heard that cry of pain,
A moan of mortal agony, then all was still again.
That night was hell with all the frills, and when the dawn broke dim,
I saw a lean and level land, but never sign of him.
I saw a flat and frozen shore of hideous device,
I saw a long-drawn strand of rope that vanished through the ice.
And on that treeless, rockless shore I found my partner — dead.
No place was there to snub the raft, so — HE HAD SERVED INSTEAD;
And with the rope lashed round his waist, in last defiant fight,
He'd thrown himself beneath the ice, that closed and gripped him tight;
And there he'd held us back from death, as fast in death he lay. . . .
Say, boys! I'm not the pious brand, but — I just tried to pray.
And then I looked to Julie Claire, and sore abashed was I,
For from the robes that covered her, I — HEARD — A — BABY — CRY. . . .
Thus was Love conqueror of death, and life for life was given;
And though no saint on earth, d'ye think —
Bill's squared hisself with Heaven?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Miserable
()
Date: March 19, 2015 12:22PM
No-Spin Zone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Locked up? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where's Eesh?
>
>
> Matter of public record: eesh filed a protective
> order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
>
> People knew this, right?
>
> To answer your question...no way to spin this
> loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low hoping
> no one would notice.
Where's the record of this? How would anyone know this or post this besides Mr. Miserable? And why was it rejected?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Locked up? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where's Eesh?
>
>
> Matter of public record: eesh filed a protective
> order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
>
> People knew this, right?
>
> To answer your question...no way to spin this
> loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low hoping
> no one would notice.
Where's the record of this? How would anyone know this or post this besides Mr. Miserable? And why was it rejected?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
What happen?
()
Date: March 19, 2015 12:30PM
Are ya'll saying Henrico kicked him to the curb? Told him to fuck off? What happen?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Illegal activities
()
Date: March 19, 2015 01:06PM
OP used a recording device in the courtroom.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
YwdPN
()
Date: March 19, 2015 02:33PM
Illegal activities Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP used a recording device in the courtroom.
If he did, he violated the court rules. No can do. If the bailiff sees that, you'd be told to turn if off, at a minimum, or at worst have it confiscated until court ends for the day.
-------------------------------------------------------
> OP used a recording device in the courtroom.
If he did, he violated the court rules. No can do. If the bailiff sees that, you'd be told to turn if off, at a minimum, or at worst have it confiscated until court ends for the day.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 19, 2015 03:19PM
Nope.
I certainly did not use recording equipment; I just took reasonably good notes.
I certainly did not use recording equipment; I just took reasonably good notes.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
It was bulloney
()
Date: March 19, 2015 04:08PM
What happen? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are ya'll saying Henrico kicked him to the curb?
> Told him to fuck off? What happen?
No proof as usual just some troll stirring shit up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are ya'll saying Henrico kicked him to the curb?
> Told him to fuck off? What happen?
No proof as usual just some troll stirring shit up.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
YPkMx
()
Date: March 19, 2015 04:39PM
Miserable Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No-Spin Zone Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Locked up? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Where's Eesh?
> >
> >
> > Matter of public record: eesh filed a
> protective
> > order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
> >
> > People knew this, right?
> >
> > To answer your question...no way to spin this
> > loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low
> hoping
> > no one would notice.
>
>
>
This does appear to be bullshit. No record of such a filing.
However, the trial is scheduled for January 11, 2016.
-------------------------------------------------------
> No-Spin Zone Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Locked up? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Where's Eesh?
> >
> >
> > Matter of public record: eesh filed a
> protective
> > order on Misery, it was rejected on Monday.
> >
> > People knew this, right?
> >
> > To answer your question...no way to spin this
> > loss, suppose he decided it best to lay low
> hoping
> > no one would notice.
>
>
>
This does appear to be bullshit. No record of such a filing.
However, the trial is scheduled for January 11, 2016.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
pH9PN
()
Date: March 19, 2015 04:41PM
You can't look up something like that
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HXHjG
()
Date: March 19, 2015 04:47PM
pH9PN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can't look up something like that
Sigh. Yes you can:
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/circuit/cpan.htm
You just need an account.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can't look up something like that
Sigh. Yes you can:
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/circuit/cpan.htm
You just need an account.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh lied?
()
Date: March 19, 2015 04:52PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in front of the Henrico judge for my permanent protective order hearing is a definite predictor of future behavior. I just don't know how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going before a court and explaining in detail what has supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in front of the Henrico judge for my permanent protective order hearing is a definite predictor of future behavior. I just don't know how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going before a court and explaining in detail what has supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Must be that huge fail OP again
()
Date: March 19, 2015 05:03PM
If you can look everything up and have an account why don't you post a screen cap of the trial date?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Culture Warrior
()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:25PM
Eesh lied? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
> Posted by: eesh ()
> Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
>
> ...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in
> front of the Henrico judge for my permanent
> protective order hearing is a definite
> predictor of future behavior. I just don't know
> how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going
> before a court and explaining in detail what has
> supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
It was DISMISSED, REJECTED, KICKED THE F OUT, and eesh was reamed out in the process. There you go. For the record. I'm not going to look up the records. You do that if you want. He lost a major battle Monday. Not referring to civil suit.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
> Posted by: eesh ()
> Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
>
> ...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in
> front of the Henrico judge for my permanent
> protective order hearing is a definite
> predictor of future behavior. I just don't know
> how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going
> before a court and explaining in detail what has
> supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
It was DISMISSED, REJECTED, KICKED THE F OUT, and eesh was reamed out in the process. There you go. For the record. I'm not going to look up the records. You do that if you want. He lost a major battle Monday. Not referring to civil suit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Who are you?
()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:31PM
And how do you know this?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jimmylegs
()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:40PM
Who are you? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And how do you know this?
Because I stood three feet from him, next to my attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies and twisting of facts. This is the one and only time I'm going to go on record as myself to represent a court proceeding as it actually happened. You all may go back to twisting and misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom, unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
-------------------------------------------------------
> And how do you know this?
Because I stood three feet from him, next to my attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies and twisting of facts. This is the one and only time I'm going to go on record as myself to represent a court proceeding as it actually happened. You all may go back to twisting and misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom, unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
legs of jimmy
()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:49PM
jimmylegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
So you have been posting
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
So you have been posting
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Justice will be served
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:00PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
That would have been me actually. I am a friend to a poster here eesh has victimized as well. I went to gather information and understand how the proceedings work. I will be there for every court date in this trial.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as
> well, sitting by himself dressed much more
> casually.
>
That would have been me actually. I am a friend to a poster here eesh has victimized as well. I went to gather information and understand how the proceedings work. I will be there for every court date in this trial.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lolwut
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:02PM
So now there were two people there?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MIZ > EESH
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:02PM
jimmylegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
BAM!
That's awesome! Good for you, MIZ! This will help your civil suit EVEN MORE!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
BAM!
That's awesome! Good for you, MIZ! This will help your civil suit EVEN MORE!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
no loyalty amongst thieves
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:05PM
jimmylegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
so those private messages megan sent really were from miz..
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
so those private messages megan sent really were from miz..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Friend of Megan
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:05PM
I was there too. Megan wanted to go, but her PTSD flared and asked if I would go.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Meeper ally
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:08PM
I sat in the front row. I am a private investigator employed by Nick the meeper. Believe me when I say I took serious notes on the proceedings and mailed them to the Washington Post.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Justice for pgens
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:10PM
I sat in the second row to the far left. I am a certified court room drawer and sketchologist. I will post my sketches at an appropriate Tim.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Little Kingdom of Dirt
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:11PM
"Little kingdom of dirt" that you put the most filth into..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Radio friend
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:13PM
I stood up in the back. I am an associate of Radiophile's. He is terrified everywhere he goes because of his outing. I took notes and have blogged extensively about the proceedings.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WHO THE FUCK?!
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:14PM
WHO THE FUCK IS JIMMY!?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I know Mephisto
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:16PM
I sat third row three feet from eesh. I have a photographic memory and used adobe illustrator to recreate the scenes of the courtroom.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jimmy misery
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:17PM
WHO THE FUCK?! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WHO THE FUCK IS JIMMY!?
William Moreno aka Mr. Misery.
-------------------------------------------------------
> WHO THE FUCK IS JIMMY!?
William Moreno aka Mr. Misery.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
is this real life.........?!
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:19PM
jimmy misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WHO THE FUCK?! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WHO THE FUCK IS JIMMY!?
>
>
> William Moreno aka Mr. Misery.
-------------------------------------------------------
> WHO THE FUCK?! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WHO THE FUCK IS JIMMY!?
>
>
> William Moreno aka Mr. Misery.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mind blown
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:24PM
mind is totally blown.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EmCPH
()
Date: March 19, 2015 08:57PM
good, so now eesh will have lost another battle and it has been confirmed by someone actually there
eesh - 0
miz - 1
by the end:
eesh - 0
miz - 2
miz family - guesstimate of $150,000
eesh - 0
miz - 1
by the end:
eesh - 0
miz - 2
miz family - guesstimate of $150,000
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Old Deputy
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:22PM
I was the bailiff. I fell asleep.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Old time ffxu'r
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:30PM
jimmylegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
While I was never a fan of your posts, I hope you do win. Eesh took it way too far on multiple occasions.
Good luck
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
While I was never a fan of your posts, I hope you do win. Eesh took it way too far on multiple occasions.
Good luck
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Insight please
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:30PM
Is that why eesh has stopped posting? Or did he lawyer up?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Hey misery
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:36PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This might be a good thread to post this in as
> there seem to be some posters with legal
> experience here.
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> especially helpful.
>
>
> #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
Did they bring this post up in court? Eesh showing all of FFXU that getting a protective order is just game so he can act like a victim.
-------------------------------------------------------
> This might be a good thread to post this in as
> there seem to be some posters with legal
> experience here.
>
>
> Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> especially helpful.
>
>
> #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
>
>
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
> php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
Did they bring this post up in court? Eesh showing all of FFXU that getting a protective order is just game so he can act like a victim.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
War on Christmas
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:46PM
Hey misery Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This might be a good thread to post this in as
> > there seem to be some posters with legal
> > experience here.
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> > Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> > program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> > especially helpful.
> >
> >
> > #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
> >
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
> >
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
>
>
> Did they bring this post up in court? Eesh showing
> all of FFXU that getting a protective order is
> just game so he can act like a victim.
Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's basis for requesting the protective order. The judge categorically questioned, doubted, and ultimately rejected what was presented. It was over within 10 minutes. VINE was not especially helpful.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This might be a good thread to post this in as
> > there seem to be some posters with legal
> > experience here.
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have experience with the Witness
> > Assistance Program and VINE? Seems like a good
> > program, I might check it out. VINE looks
> > especially helpful.
> >
> >
> > #refusingtobeavictim #helpisoutthere #justice
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179326,filename=1.jpg">
> >
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179327,filename=Scan0002.jpg">
> >
> >
> > >
> src="http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.
>
> > php?40,file=179328,filename=3.jpg">
>
>
> Did they bring this post up in court? Eesh showing
> all of FFXU that getting a protective order is
> just game so he can act like a victim.
Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's basis for requesting the protective order. The judge categorically questioned, doubted, and ultimately rejected what was presented. It was over within 10 minutes. VINE was not especially helpful.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh 2 lazy to login
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:52PM
> Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's
> basis for requesting the protective order. The
> judge categorically questioned, doubted, and
> ultimately rejected what was presented. It was
> over within 10 minutes. VINE was not especially
> helpful.
Hey FFXU, he is lying! That didn't happen! He is just a troll.
Believe me, believe me, don't believe him!!!!!!!!!!! I swear that's not what happened, that guy is the lamb center poster, he is just lying. Once I get out of the shower I'll show you the evidence.
> basis for requesting the protective order. The
> judge categorically questioned, doubted, and
> ultimately rejected what was presented. It was
> over within 10 minutes. VINE was not especially
> helpful.
Hey FFXU, he is lying! That didn't happen! He is just a troll.
Believe me, believe me, don't believe him!!!!!!!!!!! I swear that's not what happened, that guy is the lamb center poster, he is just lying. Once I get out of the shower I'll show you the evidence.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Umhh6
()
Date: March 19, 2015 09:53PM
"Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's basis for requesting the protective order"
--
Which was what?
--
Which was what?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MIZ > EESH
()
Date: March 19, 2015 10:09PM
Umhh6 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's
> basis for requesting the protective order"
>
>
>
> --
> Which was what?
Probably some Fagcity99 posts eesh has been babbling about for the past two years
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's
> basis for requesting the protective order"
>
>
>
> --
> Which was what?
Probably some Fagcity99 posts eesh has been babbling about for the past two years
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Who's Lookin' Out For You?
()
Date: March 19, 2015 10:15PM
MIZ > EESH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Umhh6 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's
> > basis for requesting the protective order"
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Which was what?
>
>
> Probably some Fagcity99 posts eesh has been
> babbling about for the past two years
If only it were that benign. I'd be happy to tell you what it really was, but only at the appropriate time. Meanwhile, I think he realizes this was his Wile E. Coyote moment...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Umhh6 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "Nothing was brought up except the petitioner's
> > basis for requesting the protective order"
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Which was what?
>
>
> Probably some Fagcity99 posts eesh has been
> babbling about for the past two years
If only it were that benign. I'd be happy to tell you what it really was, but only at the appropriate time. Meanwhile, I think he realizes this was his Wile E. Coyote moment...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KThFu
()
Date: March 19, 2015 10:18PM
post one of your satire posts depicting the tale
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
witness assistance vinyard
()
Date: March 19, 2015 10:45PM
If I were a representative from the witness assistance program or Vine, I would have serious doubts about the sincerity of someone who would post the details of his "victimization" in such a flip way to a public forum.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Comparing life to cartoons...
()
Date: March 19, 2015 10:50PM
Who's Lookin' Out For You? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If only it were that benign. I'd be happy to tell
> you what it really was, but only at the
> appropriate time. Meanwhile, I think he realizes
> this was his Wile E. Coyote moment...
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If only it were that benign. I'd be happy to tell
> you what it really was, but only at the
> appropriate time. Meanwhile, I think he realizes
> this was his Wile E. Coyote moment...
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
he lawyer'd up
()
Date: March 20, 2015 12:44PM
Someone been logged in but not posting... Lawyered up maybe?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
StupidTrial
()
Date: March 20, 2015 12:59PM
EmCPH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> good, so now eesh will have lost another battle
> and it has been confirmed by someone actually
> there
>
> eesh - 0
> miz - 1
>
> by the end:
>
> eesh - 0
> miz - 2
> miz family - guesstimate of $150,000
There shouldn't even be a civil trial, IMO and I am just a guy watching from the stands.
This kind of thing is really dumb. If someone is in fear of their safety, they file a restraining order .. period. No contact. If the person who filed continually puts themselves in remote contact via a forum, then that should be THEIR problem.
Awarding money for any of this kind of thing seems to be outlandish IMO.
150K!! .. if the judge is high on crack, perhaps.
How about throwing the suit out and stop wasting tax dollars and time on this nonsense?
-------------------------------------------------------
> good, so now eesh will have lost another battle
> and it has been confirmed by someone actually
> there
>
> eesh - 0
> miz - 1
>
> by the end:
>
> eesh - 0
> miz - 2
> miz family - guesstimate of $150,000
There shouldn't even be a civil trial, IMO and I am just a guy watching from the stands.
This kind of thing is really dumb. If someone is in fear of their safety, they file a restraining order .. period. No contact. If the person who filed continually puts themselves in remote contact via a forum, then that should be THEIR problem.
Awarding money for any of this kind of thing seems to be outlandish IMO.
150K!! .. if the judge is high on crack, perhaps.
How about throwing the suit out and stop wasting tax dollars and time on this nonsense?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
n9McL
()
Date: March 20, 2015 01:00PM
Did you even read the lawsuit?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Case has been dismissed
()
Date: March 20, 2015 01:26PM
n9McL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you even read the lawsuit?
Moreno said it was rejected, dismissed, throw the fuck out earlier this week.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did you even read the lawsuit?
Moreno said it was rejected, dismissed, throw the fuck out earlier this week.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xC6xM
()
Date: March 20, 2015 06:32PM
eeshs case AGAINST miz was thrown out
mizs case against eesh is still going, eesh fucked up and has a couple of days to get his shit together, per the judge
mizs families case against eesh is still to come and WILL end up with eesh losing and owing a shitload of money
mizs case against eesh is still going, eesh fucked up and has a couple of days to get his shit together, per the judge
mizs families case against eesh is still to come and WILL end up with eesh losing and owing a shitload of money
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
go back to trolling megan
()
Date: March 20, 2015 06:36PM
you are that same person who was trolling megan before..don't you have anything better to do than scream that "nothing" is ever going to happen here?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tom, Cary, and Mike Nero
()
Date: March 21, 2015 05:20AM
The Four Stages of Cruelty is a series of four printed engravings published by English artist William Hogarth in 1751.
In 2012, when Fairfax Underground was launched, small acts of cruelty very slowly began to escalate...until we, dear reader, found ourselves left with what is before us today. Did it need to come this far? Who is to blame? Did the escalation of events constitute--truly--something "that residents of Fairfax County might find interesting"?
An open question:
----
Attachments:
In 2012, when Fairfax Underground was launched, small acts of cruelty very slowly began to escalate...until we, dear reader, found ourselves left with what is before us today. Did it need to come this far? Who is to blame? Did the escalation of events constitute--truly--something "that residents of Fairfax County might find interesting"?
An open question:
----
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 21, 2015 06:10AM
I am relatively new to this site, but is someone purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort to make it less desirable for readers?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: March 21, 2015 06:23AM
Just to get thing back on track, for those who have not seen the suit...
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1772372/page-1.html
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1772372/page-1.html
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MXtGX
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:05AM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site
No the hell you're not
> but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
They sure are and it's working
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site
No the hell you're not
> but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
They sure are and it's working
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CyberSafetyAdvice
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:11AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
read between the lines
()
Date: March 21, 2015 12:27PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site, but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
CourthouseObserver, if you'd simply take the time to read and observe posts such as the one above the one I'm quoting by you, you might see that it's a criticism of this site and the administrator, who ultimately allowed this suit to come to fruition in the first place. It didn't need to come this far. This is not "junk". You write very well...I'm surprised you would fail to read these posts and fail to read the criticisms therein. This suit did not have to happen....that is the main theme.
/
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site, but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
CourthouseObserver, if you'd simply take the time to read and observe posts such as the one above the one I'm quoting by you, you might see that it's a criticism of this site and the administrator, who ultimately allowed this suit to come to fruition in the first place. It didn't need to come this far. This is not "junk". You write very well...I'm surprised you would fail to read these posts and fail to read the criticisms therein. This suit did not have to happen....that is the main theme.
/
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Empire of Dirt
()
Date: March 21, 2015 01:17PM
Nobody cares enough to read all that shit and the simple fact that you compare your life to cartoons and tales from many centuries ago shows that you're detached from reality and should be in a mental ward. Had you left this site when you were banned none of this would have happened. I'm not saying you or especially your family deserved any of that but you just kept coming back for more, like you're doing right now.
Is this really the realm in which you want to live in? Then you made your bed and must lie in it but your family probably wishes you'd stop posting here. You're proving nothing and making no point except that you have a serious issue with this website and look at what it resulted in..
Is this really the realm in which you want to live in? Then you made your bed and must lie in it but your family probably wishes you'd stop posting here. You're proving nothing and making no point except that you have a serious issue with this website and look at what it resulted in..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
All wise and knowing
()
Date: March 21, 2015 02:14PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site, but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
If one takes a few minutes to click on a few threads here one will quickly come to the correct conclusion that the vast majority of the "posts" on here are just mindless drival, posted by morons, with IQs that are below room temperature.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am relatively new to this site, but is someone
> purposely posting junk in this thread in an effort
> to make it less desirable for readers?
If one takes a few minutes to click on a few threads here one will quickly come to the correct conclusion that the vast majority of the "posts" on here are just mindless drival, posted by morons, with IQs that are below room temperature.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
YLVpt
()
Date: March 21, 2015 02:58PM
Empire of Dirt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nobody cares enough to read all that shit and the
> simple fact that you compare your life to cartoons
> and tales from many centuries ago shows that
> you're detached from reality and should be in a
> mental ward. Had you left this site when you were
> banned none of this would have happened. I'm not
> saying you or especially your family deserved any
> of that but you just kept coming back for more,
> like you're doing right now.
>
> Is this really the realm in which you want to live
> in? Then you made your bed and must lie in it but
> your family probably wishes you'd stop posting
> here. You're proving nothing and making no point
> except that you have a serious issue with this
> website and look at what it resulted in..
yes misery why don't you just shut up and get off the site? you say eesh is making a mockery of this but you are too with your pictures and story telling. you have given away details of what really happened in your tales and that's just as bad as what he's doing it. you said some really gross stuff about the molestion of toddles, raping babies and fucking kids and that isn't a good look either. people really believe you have touched kids based on what you yourself have said here..
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nobody cares enough to read all that shit and the
> simple fact that you compare your life to cartoons
> and tales from many centuries ago shows that
> you're detached from reality and should be in a
> mental ward. Had you left this site when you were
> banned none of this would have happened. I'm not
> saying you or especially your family deserved any
> of that but you just kept coming back for more,
> like you're doing right now.
>
> Is this really the realm in which you want to live
> in? Then you made your bed and must lie in it but
> your family probably wishes you'd stop posting
> here. You're proving nothing and making no point
> except that you have a serious issue with this
> website and look at what it resulted in..
yes misery why don't you just shut up and get off the site? you say eesh is making a mockery of this but you are too with your pictures and story telling. you have given away details of what really happened in your tales and that's just as bad as what he's doing it. you said some really gross stuff about the molestion of toddles, raping babies and fucking kids and that isn't a good look either. people really believe you have touched kids based on what you yourself have said here..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Plausible Deniability
()
Date: March 21, 2015 03:12PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just to get thing back on track, for those who
> have not seen the suit...
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 72372/page-1.html
If I were eesh I would have never posted that and acted like I had no idea who the hell any of these people were and that I had never heard of Fairfax Underground and that they had the wrong guy. There's no way to prove who posted what or did what but he already admitted to doing things and that can and will be used against him.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Just to get thing back on track, for those who
> have not seen the suit...
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 72372/page-1.html
If I were eesh I would have never posted that and acted like I had no idea who the hell any of these people were and that I had never heard of Fairfax Underground and that they had the wrong guy. There's no way to prove who posted what or did what but he already admitted to doing things and that can and will be used against him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Bruja
()
Date: March 21, 2015 05:45PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Knew it
()
Date: March 21, 2015 06:29PM
Bruja Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 75768/1777245.html#msg-1777245
I knew there was a reason eesh was suddenly kissing lizzie's ass. She's going to get a summons to appear and testify.
If eesh is conntected to the swatting will he go to federal prison?
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 75768/1777245.html#msg-1777245
I knew there was a reason eesh was suddenly kissing lizzie's ass. She's going to get a summons to appear and testify.
If eesh is conntected to the swatting will he go to federal prison?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourIegs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 06:49PM
Plausible Deniability Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I were eesh I would have never posted that and
> acted like I had no idea who the hell any of these
> people were and that I had never heard of Fairfax
> Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
This assumes that the "lawsuit" (lawlsuit ?) was not worked out in cooperation between Miz and eesh to catch the real villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . . Eli.
-------------------------------------------------------
> If I were eesh I would have never posted that and
> acted like I had no idea who the hell any of these
> people were and that I had never heard of Fairfax
> Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
This assumes that the "lawsuit" (lawlsuit ?) was not worked out in cooperation between Miz and eesh to catch the real villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . . Eli.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Follow the Yellow Brick Road
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:10PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
a perfect crime..?
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:12PM
Knew it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If eesh is conntected to the swatting will he go
> to federal prison?
how are you going to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt?
lol..............
eesh someone would never have done it unless he was sure it was a "perfect crime"...
PS:
Whateesh someone wishes had happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOfJcYUlqjo
Attachments:
"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used." - Cary (explaining his definition of the word "garbage")
-------------------------------------------------------
> If eesh is conntected to the swatting will he go
> to federal prison?
how are you going to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt?
lol..............
PS:
What
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOfJcYUlqjo
Attachments:
"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used." - Cary (explaining his definition of the word "garbage")
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Idiot
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:29PM
Knew it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bruja Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
>
> > 75768/1777245.html#msg-1777245
>
>
> I knew there was a reason eesh was suddenly
> kissing lizzie's ass. She's going to get a summons
> to appear and testify.
No she won't. Anything she said would be hearsay which is admissible in court.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bruja Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
>
> > 75768/1777245.html#msg-1777245
>
>
> I knew there was a reason eesh was suddenly
> kissing lizzie's ass. She's going to get a summons
> to appear and testify.
No she won't. Anything she said would be hearsay which is admissible in court.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Idiot
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:37PM
Not admissible*
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
7LXVt
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:39PM
fourIegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Plausible Deniability Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I were eesh I would have never posted that
> and
> > acted like I had no idea who the hell any of
> these
> > people were and that I had never heard of
> Fairfax
> > Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
>
>
> This assumes that the "lawsuit" (lawlsuit
> ?) was not worked out in cooperation
> between Miz and eesh to catch the real
> villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . .
> Eli.
why are you impersonating fourlegs?
Go to: Forum List Back to Forum Search Log In
User Profile : fourIegs
Email: Hidden
Posts: 6
Registered: 02/22/2015 10:41PM
-------------------------------------------------------
> Plausible Deniability Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If I were eesh I would have never posted that
> and
> > acted like I had no idea who the hell any of
> these
> > people were and that I had never heard of
> Fairfax
> > Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
>
>
> This assumes that the "lawsuit" (lawlsuit
> ?) was not worked out in cooperation
> between Miz and eesh to catch the real
> villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . .
> Eli.
why are you impersonating fourlegs?
Go to: Forum List Back to Forum Search Log In
User Profile : fourIegs
Email: Hidden
Posts: 6
Registered: 02/22/2015 10:41PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Misinformation guy
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:41PM
HXHjG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pH9PN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You can't look up something like that
>
> Sigh. Yes you can:
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/circuit/cpan.h
> tm
>
> You just need an account.
So you say that you can look up to see if a protective order was filed but you said that no such thing was filed but Misery was it was filed even though it was rejected.
-------------------------------------------------------
> pH9PN Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You can't look up something like that
>
> Sigh. Yes you can:
>
>
> http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/courts/circuit/cpan.h
> tm
>
> You just need an account.
So you say that you can look up to see if a protective order was filed but you said that no such thing was filed but Misery was it was filed even though it was rejected.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
No Forced entry
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:43PM
unwelcome houseguest Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery is back! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mr. Misery is back!
>
> "Back" implies that he left at some point.
+2
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Misery is back! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mr. Misery is back!
>
> "Back" implies that he left at some point.
+2
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
four legs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:46PM
7LXVt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> why are you impersonating fourlegs?
Why is he impersonating me?
-------------------------------------------------------
> why are you impersonating fourlegs?
Why is he impersonating me?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Please raise your right hand....
()
Date: March 21, 2015 07:50PM
jimmylegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
Are you sure you weren't looking at the ground the entire time?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who are you? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And how do you know this?
>
>
> Because I stood three feet from him, next to my
> attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies
> and twisting of facts. This is the one and only
> time I'm going to go on record as myself to
> represent a court proceeding as it actually
> happened. You all may go back to twisting and
> misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy
> in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom,
> unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
Are you sure you weren't looking at the ground the entire time?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourlegs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:18PM
7LXVt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fourIegs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Plausible Deniability Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I were eesh I would have never posted that
> > and
> > > acted like I had no idea who the hell any of
> > these
> > > people were and that I had never heard of
> > Fairfax
> > > Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
> >
> >
> > This assumes that the "lawsuit"
> (lawlsuit
> > ?) was not worked out in cooperation
> > between Miz and eesh to catch the real
> > villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . .
> > Eli.
>
> why are you impersonating fourlegs?
>
>
>
> Go to: Forum List Back to Forum Search Log In
> User Profile : fourIegs
> Email: Hidden
> Posts: 6
> Registered: 02/22/2015 10:41PM
I won't post on this thread so assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
-------------------------------------------------------
> fourIegs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Plausible Deniability Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If I were eesh I would have never posted that
> > and
> > > acted like I had no idea who the hell any of
> > these
> > > people were and that I had never heard of
> > Fairfax
> > > Underground and that they had the wrong guy.
> >
> >
> > This assumes that the "lawsuit"
> (lawlsuit
> > ?) was not worked out in cooperation
> > between Miz and eesh to catch the real
> > villian, their mutual enemy. . . . . .
> > Eli.
>
> why are you impersonating fourlegs?
>
>
>
> Go to: Forum List Back to Forum Search Log In
> User Profile : fourIegs
> Email: Hidden
> Posts: 6
> Registered: 02/22/2015 10:41PM
I won't post on this thread so assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourIegs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:26PM
smh.
Imposter post above.
Imposter post above.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourlegs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:38PM
fourIegs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> smh.
>
> Imposter post above.
If you're going to pose as me, at least copy my signature.
Eli....
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
-------------------------------------------------------
> smh.
>
> Imposter post above.
If you're going to pose as me, at least copy my signature.
Eli....
___________________________________________________________
“Imitation is suicide.”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fourIegs
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:50PM
Fake.
Like I said before, assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
Uh...
Like I said before, assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
Uh...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EIi
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:54PM
Just for the record...
I won't post on this thread so assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
Including me.
I won't post on this thread so assume that anyone who posts under my name here is not me.
Including me.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
^ Clone Eli Alert ^
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:58PM
User Profile : eesh
Email: Hidden
Real Name: Jackalope
Posts: 53,020
Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
Last Activity: 03/21/2015 11:55PM
Email: Hidden
Real Name: Jackalope
Posts: 53,020
Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
Last Activity: 03/21/2015 11:55PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
????
()
Date: March 21, 2015 11:59PM
Guess whose back...
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hwyJx
()
Date: March 22, 2015 12:00AM
Hey, Megan!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Dumbphone
()
Date: March 22, 2015 12:17AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Double post!
Re: The guns of eesh
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 16, 2014 11:47PM
Stop posting from a smartphone and you won't double post.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
-------------------------------------------------------
> Double post!
Re: The guns of eesh
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 16, 2014 11:47PM
Stop posting from a smartphone and you won't double post.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
What??
()
Date: March 22, 2015 09:22AM
^ Clone Eli Alert ^ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> User Profile : eesh
> Email: Hidden
> Real Name: Jackalope
> Posts: 53,020
> Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
> Last Activity: 03/21/2015 11:55PM
Is it just me, or is over 53000 post in less than 6 years crazy?
Hell, there's only 365 days a year and that doesn't count the ones he doesn't sign in for.
-------------------------------------------------------
> User Profile : eesh
> Email: Hidden
> Real Name: Jackalope
> Posts: 53,020
> Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
> Last Activity: 03/21/2015 11:55PM
Is it just me, or is over 53000 post in less than 6 years crazy?
Hell, there's only 365 days a year and that doesn't count the ones he doesn't sign in for.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hasNoLife
()
Date: March 22, 2015 10:19AM
What?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Is it just me, or is over 53000 post in less than
> 6 years crazy?
> Hell, there's only 365 days a year and that
> doesn't count the ones he doesn't sign in for.
That's over 25 posts per day. Impressive.
Miz and his parents got a real lawyer. The civil lawsuit is real.
A civil lawsuit only requires a preponderance of evidence, not the beyond reasonable doubt required in a criminal trial.
Eesh is handling this civil suit as if it requires Miz to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Representing himself is unwise. Much of what is alleged can be successfully countered with denial and alibis, but some of it will remain.
Will there be a court transcript available to FFU? That's the only account of these proceedings I would trust.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Is it just me, or is over 53000 post in less than
> 6 years crazy?
> Hell, there's only 365 days a year and that
> doesn't count the ones he doesn't sign in for.
That's over 25 posts per day. Impressive.
Miz and his parents got a real lawyer. The civil lawsuit is real.
A civil lawsuit only requires a preponderance of evidence, not the beyond reasonable doubt required in a criminal trial.
Eesh is handling this civil suit as if it requires Miz to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Representing himself is unwise. Much of what is alleged can be successfully countered with denial and alibis, but some of it will remain.
Will there be a court transcript available to FFU? That's the only account of these proceedings I would trust.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Isolated
()
Date: March 22, 2015 03:30PM
When you're isolated from society and have very little form of human contact you will do some crazy things.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Sanctions in Sow
()
Date: March 22, 2015 04:21PM
Isolated Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When you're isolated from society and have very
> little form of human contact you will do some
> crazy things.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1521830/1521830.html#msg-1521830
Like this?
-------------------------------------------------------
> When you're isolated from society and have very
> little form of human contact you will do some
> crazy things.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1521830/1521830.html#msg-1521830
Like this?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Rewind
()
Date: March 22, 2015 04:34PM
Man, Michael Josef Basl of 8106 Strath Road, Henrico VA, if you can't even keep your story straight about that minor detail, I'm genuinely worried for you, brother! You have already referenced meeting a detective in Leesburg for leaving a note on their car (remember, 'Gold Kia Rio'?), your invention of saying you agreed to stop harassing them because they have an internet addiction (whom actually said that to whom, by the way...?) and they keep threatening to kill themselves...remember THAT story? What a great humanitarian you are! Always making a difference, Michael Basl. Stop driving 3 1/2 hours to leave notes on cars so a crazy person won't kill himself...you should work with Unicef.
It reads better when you leave out the part about how you hemmed and hawed and were at a loss for words except for a few dumb screen names you stupidly said to a grown-ass man with a badge and a gun, claiming it's all fart_zilla_titty_Shit1996 who made you do it. A man who solves double homicides for a living. And you sat there, sniveling, trembling, taking it like a bitch......and the best you had to say was, "S8ter_DawgTittyfuck99" is to blame!". You said a name that ridiculous to a MAN. Who solves murders. You are on a losing streak, brother.
You're forgetting your own story now, goldilocks.
...and if you want facts and proof, you know personally I've got it, big boy. Would you like the rest of the class to see?
But who cares. Let them think what they want to think. Just try not to drop the soap when your girlfriend gives you up and the pieces all come together. You're in over your head this time, boy. You had a good run, but you got sloppy. Lost your touch. Seal this envelope and answer the question written inside on your sentencing day:
"was it worth it?"
seriously.........why can't you just BE NICE? What keeps you from being a decent human being? It isn't that hard. Be a decent person. Why do these things? Really...
It reads better when you leave out the part about how you hemmed and hawed and were at a loss for words except for a few dumb screen names you stupidly said to a grown-ass man with a badge and a gun, claiming it's all fart_zilla_titty_Shit1996 who made you do it. A man who solves double homicides for a living. And you sat there, sniveling, trembling, taking it like a bitch......and the best you had to say was, "S8ter_DawgTittyfuck99" is to blame!". You said a name that ridiculous to a MAN. Who solves murders. You are on a losing streak, brother.
You're forgetting your own story now, goldilocks.
...and if you want facts and proof, you know personally I've got it, big boy. Would you like the rest of the class to see?
But who cares. Let them think what they want to think. Just try not to drop the soap when your girlfriend gives you up and the pieces all come together. You're in over your head this time, boy. You had a good run, but you got sloppy. Lost your touch. Seal this envelope and answer the question written inside on your sentencing day:
"was it worth it?"
seriously.........why can't you just BE NICE? What keeps you from being a decent human being? It isn't that hard. Be a decent person. Why do these things? Really...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Long time lurker
()
Date: March 22, 2015 04:49PM
I haven't ever seen fart_zilla_titty_Shit1996 posting before
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
shitty titty gang bang 69
()
Date: March 22, 2015 04:53PM
Long time lurker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I haven't ever seen fart_zilla_titty_Shit1996
> posting before
It's making fun of dumb names like misery's fagcity99.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I haven't ever seen fart_zilla_titty_Shit1996
> posting before
It's making fun of dumb names like misery's fagcity99.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Long time lurker
()
Date: March 22, 2015 04:54PM
I know..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Autism
()
Date: March 22, 2015 05:32PM
Repost. Posted in wrong thread.
The biggest issue that's going to come into play is that eesh is a grown man who bullied a person he knew had developmental issues. No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial, he did not harass a man with Asp-burgers Syndrome.
The biggest issue that's going to come into play is that eesh is a grown man who bullied a person he knew had developmental issues. No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial, he did not harass a man with Asp-burgers Syndrome.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KHEw6
()
Date: March 22, 2015 05:36PM
It's still Asperger's*
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: March 22, 2015 05:40PM
jimmylegs is william moreno Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Misery, you stalk and threaten every day. STFU
>
>
> BTW, you swatted your own home. The police know
> this.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1732401/1732401.html#msg-1732401
-------------------------------------------------------
> Misery, you stalk and threaten every day. STFU
>
>
> BTW, you swatted your own home. The police know
> this.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1732401/1732401.html#msg-1732401
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
vbcVu
()
Date: March 22, 2015 05:59PM
uberX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jimmylegs is william moreno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Misery, you stalk and threaten every day. STFU
> >
> >
> > BTW, you swatted your own home. The police know
> > this.
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 32401/1732401.html#msg-1732401
Uber you're going to be the next one outed, stalked, harassed and swatted, eesh is keeping notes on you.
-------------------------------------------------------
> jimmylegs is william moreno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Misery, you stalk and threaten every day. STFU
> >
> >
> > BTW, you swatted your own home. The police know
> > this.
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 32401/1732401.html#msg-1732401
Uber you're going to be the next one outed, stalked, harassed and swatted, eesh is keeping notes on you.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
This needs to be remembered
()
Date: March 22, 2015 07:00PM
Autism Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
marapet
()
Date: March 22, 2015 08:05PM
Autism Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial
But the jury'll believe eesh just like the judge did last week, right?!
I mean, when you combine all the evidence eesh has, with the obvious sincerity and
plausible-ish nature of his testimony, it's a lead-pipe cinch the jury'll find in his favor!
I just know it is!
And at a minimum, if the jury's not sure, they're going to look at eesh just like
the judge did and say to themselves, there's a man I can trust!
There's just a certain,,, I guess you might call it, a certain sparkle * in his eyes.
And that's why I'm on Team Eesh!
*
Phoned in a SWAT? But who would do such a thing? (laughs)
-------------------------------------------------------
> No matter what Mr. Misery has said, done or posted he is not the one on trial
But the jury'll believe eesh just like the judge did last week, right?!
I mean, when you combine all the evidence eesh has, with the obvious sincerity and
plausible-ish nature of his testimony, it's a lead-pipe cinch the jury'll find in his favor!
I just know it is!
And at a minimum, if the jury's not sure, they're going to look at eesh just like
the judge did and say to themselves, there's a man I can trust!
There's just a certain,,, I guess you might call it, a certain sparkle * in his eyes.
And that's why I'm on Team Eesh!
*
Phoned in a SWAT? But who would do such a thing? (laughs)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
scrappydoo
()
Date: March 22, 2015 09:20PM
Honest question...
Would any of Miz's behavior be relevant in this case?
Would any of Miz's behavior be relevant in this case?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Bitcoin
()
Date: March 22, 2015 09:46PM
No. If eesh even were to bring up anything Misery has done it would just make him look guilty. He "did this because Misery said that" not a good defense whatsoever.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
QUICKquestion
()
Date: March 23, 2015 10:24AM
Who is in the blue car? and who took them? I am confused? did EESH really stalk someone? lol
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xk6GU
()
Date: March 23, 2015 10:52AM
QUICKquestion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> did EESH really stalk someone? lol
The funny part is that eesh was so scared by a post saying "Meade knows who you are" that he panicked and pissed himself with an incriminating admisssion of stalking.
Scared. by. Meade (!)
Eesh
-------------------------------------------------------
> did EESH really stalk someone? lol
The funny part is that eesh was so scared by a post saying "Meade knows who you are" that he panicked and pissed himself with an incriminating admisssion of stalking.
Scared. by. Meade (!)
Eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
XtYMX
()
Date: March 23, 2015 11:22AM
yes. VINE. there was (before democrats began stealing and counterfeiting) a VICTIM FUND PROGRAM. there STILL IS.
fx co va and democrats use the money automatically allocated to pad their paychecks
the VINE pamphlet is a brain wash telling victims not to expect recovery of any kind
Ken Cuccionlelli , the last Attorney General of Virginia , was well known publicly to have promised all the victim money to pad the police officer pay in exchange for "mob loyalty"
I hope ken says it to my face. The little wimp.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lost count
()
Date: March 23, 2015 02:06PM
QUICKquestion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who is in the blue car? and who took them? I am
> confused? did EESH really stalk someone? lol
eesh has stalked several people.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who is in the blue car? and who took them? I am
> confused? did EESH really stalk someone? lol
eesh has stalked several people.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not really....
()
Date: March 23, 2015 03:06PM
What you call "stalking" was really just eesh's attempt to HELP people with an internet addiction.
Like Misery.
Putting that note on his car, moving the sticker, the chewing gum?
It's called being a "Good Samaritan".
Obviously, that's something you don't understand, or know anything about.
But eesh not only knows it, he LIVES it (unlike many hypocritial so-called "Christians"!).
The irony is that now he's being cruelly persecuted for his sincere (although, in retrospect, possibly misguided... or at least imprudent) attempts to HELP people.
Which I guess goes to show that the old adage "No good deed shall go unpunished" is (sadly) as true now as it ever was!
Hey Eesh if you ever get out Vienna way hit us up and stop by for a beer. We can throw some steaks on the grill.
Like Misery.
Putting that note on his car, moving the sticker, the chewing gum?
It's called being a "Good Samaritan".
Obviously, that's something you don't understand, or know anything about.
But eesh not only knows it, he LIVES it (unlike many hypocritial so-called "Christians"!).
The irony is that now he's being cruelly persecuted for his sincere (although, in retrospect, possibly misguided... or at least imprudent) attempts to HELP people.
Which I guess goes to show that the old adage "No good deed shall go unpunished" is (sadly) as true now as it ever was!
Hey Eesh if you ever get out Vienna way hit us up and stop by for a beer. We can throw some steaks on the grill.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh's case dismissed
()
Date: March 23, 2015 03:21PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: Culture Warrior ()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:25PM
Eesh lied? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
> Posted by: eesh ()
> Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
>
> ...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in
> front of the Henrico judge for my permanent
> protective order hearing is a definite
> predictor of future behavior. I just don't know
> how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going
> before a court and explaining in detail what has
> supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
It was DISMISSED, REJECTED, KICKED THE F OUT, and eesh was reamed out in the process. There you go. For the record. I'm not going to look up the records. You do that if you want. He lost a major battle Monday. Not referring to civil suit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: jimmylegs ()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:40PM
Who are you? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And how do you know this?
Because I stood three feet from him, next to my attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies and twisting of facts. This is the one and only time I'm going to go on record as myself to represent a court proceeding as it actually happened. You all may go back to twisting and misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom, unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
mWYGT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> why not discuss the judge THROWING OUT YOUR CASE
> AGAINST MIZ?
>
> that was hysterical
Re: Sterling man arrested for allegedly harassing FFXU member
Posted by: Spoofer ()
Date: February 10, 2015 06:22PM
Michael Basl obtained the IP address of William through IP tracking. Spoofed William's IP address and sent harassing messages to himself.
Posted by: Culture Warrior ()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:25PM
Eesh lied? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
> Posted by: eesh ()
> Date: March 13, 2015 11:07PM
>
> ...speaking of that, Mr. Misery's behavior in
> front of the Henrico judge for my permanent
> protective order hearing is a definite
> predictor of future behavior. I just don't know
> how the plaintiffs will be able to handle going
> before a court and explaining in detail what has
> supposedly happened to them. So short sighted.
It was DISMISSED, REJECTED, KICKED THE F OUT, and eesh was reamed out in the process. There you go. For the record. I'm not going to look up the records. You do that if you want. He lost a major battle Monday. Not referring to civil suit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: jimmylegs ()
Date: March 19, 2015 07:40PM
Who are you? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And how do you know this?
Because I stood three feet from him, next to my attorney, and saw it happen. I'm tired of the lies and twisting of facts. This is the one and only time I'm going to go on record as myself to represent a court proceeding as it actually happened. You all may go back to twisting and misrepresenting the truth....if it makes you happy in your little kingdom of dirt. In a courtroom, unfortunately, you can't "troll" a judge. Sorry.
mWYGT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> why not discuss the judge THROWING OUT YOUR CASE
> AGAINST MIZ?
>
> that was hysterical
Re: Sterling man arrested for allegedly harassing FFXU member
Posted by: Spoofer ()
Date: February 10, 2015 06:22PM
Michael Basl obtained the IP address of William through IP tracking. Spoofed William's IP address and sent harassing messages to himself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Acedia
()
Date: March 23, 2015 05:05PM
The reason eesh stalks is because it relieves the debilitating effects of his acedia, which is a recognized disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that no state law can conflict with federal law; and where there is such a conflict, federal law prevails.
Here, the various aspects of Virginia tort law which the Misery Complaint rests upon are clearly in conflict with the ADA.
As such, the entire suit should be thrown out.
Eesh should submit a Motion to Dismiss and/or Demurrer tout de suite if not sooner.
It can be a one-word motion: "ADA"
I exaggerate, but only slightly.
Signed,
Awesome Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Attorney who Really Understands Tort and Constitutional Law
The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that no state law can conflict with federal law; and where there is such a conflict, federal law prevails.
Here, the various aspects of Virginia tort law which the Misery Complaint rests upon are clearly in conflict with the ADA.
As such, the entire suit should be thrown out.
Eesh should submit a Motion to Dismiss and/or Demurrer tout de suite if not sooner.
It can be a one-word motion: "ADA"
I exaggerate, but only slightly.
Signed,
Awesome Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice Attorney who Really Understands Tort and Constitutional Law
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: March 23, 2015 07:01PM
uuhhh i really think people are missing the point, and it's about the rules of the board. As far I can tell they've all been broken =p shit
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition - not.
()
Date: March 23, 2015 07:56PM
Juxtaposition Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uuhhh i really think people are missing the point,
> and it's about the rules of the board. As far I
> can tell they've all been broken =p shit
I think you have missed the point.
The subject of this thread is the Miz vs. Eesh litigation,
which will take place in a real courtroom, adjudicated by a real judge,
not the case of Cary vs. Miz,
which took in an imaginary courtroom in Cary's mind,
in which Cary was the Judge, Jury, and Executioner.
Cary won that case, if memory serves.
Move on.
Cary as Judge
Cary as Jury
Cary as Executioner (aka "The Janitor")
St. Miz of Fairfax, moments before his execution
-------------------------------------------------------
> uuhhh i really think people are missing the point,
> and it's about the rules of the board. As far I
> can tell they've all been broken =p shit
I think you have missed the point.
The subject of this thread is the Miz vs. Eesh litigation,
which will take place in a real courtroom, adjudicated by a real judge,
not the case of Cary vs. Miz,
which took in an imaginary courtroom in Cary's mind,
in which Cary was the Judge, Jury, and Executioner.
Cary won that case, if memory serves.
Move on.
Cary as Judge
Cary as Jury
Cary as Executioner (aka "The Janitor")
St. Miz of Fairfax, moments before his execution
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
petit
()
Date: March 23, 2015 10:00PM
someone posted eesh's home value in another thread this would explain why he can't afford a lawyer and has to steal food
Estimated Value: $138,577
Monthly Value Change: -2%
Last Updated: 03/15/2015
Bedrooms(s): 3
Bathroom(s): 1
Square Ft: 1,471
Lot Size: --
Property Type: Single Family Home
Year Built: 1967
Monthly Est. Mortgage: $718
Monthly Est. Insurance: $46
Monthly Property Tax: $106.65
Price Per SqFt: $107
Last Sold Date: 12/29/2010
Last Sold Price: --
Estimated Value: $138,577
Monthly Value Change: -2%
Last Updated: 03/15/2015
Bedrooms(s): 3
Bathroom(s): 1
Square Ft: 1,471
Lot Size: --
Property Type: Single Family Home
Year Built: 1967
Monthly Est. Mortgage: $718
Monthly Est. Insurance: $46
Monthly Property Tax: $106.65
Price Per SqFt: $107
Last Sold Date: 12/29/2010
Last Sold Price: --
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
FPEKJ
()
Date: March 23, 2015 10:04PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1821949.html
very good thread detailing eesh's lies and continued failures
very good thread detailing eesh's lies and continued failures
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Hypocrite
()
Date: March 24, 2015 08:34AM
FPEKJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 21949.html
>
>
> very good thread detailing eesh's lies and
> continued failures
Why do you care about another mans life?
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 21949.html
>
>
> very good thread detailing eesh's lies and
> continued failures
Why do you care about another mans life?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Or lack there of?
()
Date: March 24, 2015 10:18AM
What a great "life"
And should I not care about my fellow man?
And should I not care about my fellow man?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
ULK73
()
Date: March 24, 2015 12:58PM
Hypocrite Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FPEKJ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
>
> > 21949.html
> >
> >
> > very good thread detailing eesh's lies and
> > continued failures
>
>
> Why do you care about another mans life?
Why does Eesh care about everyone else's life?
-------------------------------------------------------
> FPEKJ Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
>
> > 21949.html
> >
> >
> > very good thread detailing eesh's lies and
> > continued failures
>
>
> Why do you care about another mans life?
Why does Eesh care about everyone else's life?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stupid question
()
Date: March 24, 2015 01:09PM
Because he doesn't have one of his own...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
You know...
()
Date: March 24, 2015 02:19PM
It's been said that:
"...a man minds his own business when his business is worth minding. When its not, he resorts to minding other people's business."
Keep your eyes on your own papers people.
"...a man minds his own business when his business is worth minding. When its not, he resorts to minding other people's business."
Keep your eyes on your own papers people.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Another spin off thread
()
Date: March 24, 2015 06:22PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1822669.html
This thread is even better than this one.
This thread is even better than this one.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nico
()
Date: March 24, 2015 09:06PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know, but credibility is everything when talking
> to the police. You can bring evidence, and explain
> in an intelligent manner what is happening.....or
> you can cry wolf for a year.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know, but credibility is everything when talking
> to the police. You can bring evidence, and explain
> in an intelligent manner what is happening.....or
> you can cry wolf for a year.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
No one deserves this
()
Date: March 25, 2015 12:29AM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1823186.html
Misery missed his grandfather's funeral because of the bogus protective order essh had against him that was later thrown out.
No one deserves this. Not anyone.
Misery missed his grandfather's funeral because of the bogus protective order essh had against him that was later thrown out.
No one deserves this. Not anyone.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh's actual lawyer
()
Date: March 25, 2015 01:22AM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1823323.html
Information on the lawyer representing eesh
Information on the lawyer representing eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
"musta-quit"
()
Date: March 25, 2015 01:54AM
Oj was acquitted
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh's real lawyer
()
Date: March 25, 2015 02:35AM
.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hm4mbO
()
Date: March 25, 2015 12:34PM
Juxtaposition Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> uuhhh i really think people are missing the point,
> and it's about the rules of the board. As far I
> can tell they've all been broken =p shit
I think you're retarded and don't understand what's going on at all
-------------------------------------------------------
> uuhhh i really think people are missing the point,
> and it's about the rules of the board. As far I
> can tell they've all been broken =p shit
I think you're retarded and don't understand what's going on at all
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
causeican
()
Date: March 25, 2015 12:49PM
Acedia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The reason eesh stalks is because it relieves the
> debilitating effects of his acedia, which is a
> recognized disability under the Americans with
> Disabilities Act.
>
> The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that
> no state law can conflict with federal law; and
> where there is such a conflict, federal law
> prevails.
>
> Here, the various aspects of Virginia tort law
> which the Misery Complaint rests upon are clearly
> in conflict with the ADA.
>
> As such, the entire suit should be thrown out.
>
> Eesh should submit a Motion to Dismiss and/or
> Demurrer tout de suite if not sooner.
>
> It can be a one-word motion: "ADA"
>
> I exaggerate, but only slightly.
>
> Signed,
>
> Awesome Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice
> Attorney who Really Understands Tort and
> Constitutional Law
funny. but doesn’t he have to prove acedia - whatever the fuck that is - not just state it?
-------------------------------------------------------
> The reason eesh stalks is because it relieves the
> debilitating effects of his acedia, which is a
> recognized disability under the Americans with
> Disabilities Act.
>
> The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that
> no state law can conflict with federal law; and
> where there is such a conflict, federal law
> prevails.
>
> Here, the various aspects of Virginia tort law
> which the Misery Complaint rests upon are clearly
> in conflict with the ADA.
>
> As such, the entire suit should be thrown out.
>
> Eesh should submit a Motion to Dismiss and/or
> Demurrer tout de suite if not sooner.
>
> It can be a one-word motion: "ADA"
>
> I exaggerate, but only slightly.
>
> Signed,
>
> Awesome Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice
> Attorney who Really Understands Tort and
> Constitutional Law
funny. but doesn’t he have to prove acedia - whatever the fuck that is - not just state it?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Discredited
()
Date: March 25, 2015 02:30PM
The harrassment claim made against Misery happened much after this lawsuit was filed.
How is this lawsuit was frivolously made in an effort to prevent you from proceeding in a criminal trial against Misery if these claims you made against him hadn't even happened yet?
Also, if these claims were true, nothing would have prevented you from proceeding in a case against him. Oddly enough your case against him has already been thrown out.
Eesh posted the lawsuit thread on Jan 27. Misery was arrested Feb 2.
How is this lawsuit was frivolously made in an effort to prevent you from proceeding in a criminal trial against Misery if these claims you made against him hadn't even happened yet?
Also, if these claims were true, nothing would have prevented you from proceeding in a case against him. Oddly enough your case against him has already been thrown out.
Eesh posted the lawsuit thread on Jan 27. Misery was arrested Feb 2.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
J6nbG
()
Date: March 25, 2015 06:23PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1823607.html
Another new great thread detailing multiple, vandalisms, stalking and swatting claims by Eesh.
Another new great thread detailing multiple, vandalisms, stalking and swatting claims by Eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
kH3G6
()
Date: March 25, 2015 09:11PM
Posters stalked in the physical world by Michael Josef Basl aka "eesh"
Chuckhoffman
1
Caan/Thay
2
ding an sich
3
Mr. Misery
4
betterthanyoubitch
5
themuse
6
inkahootz
7
TheMeeper
8
Lizzie
9
Friskydingo
10
Meade
11
Conie
12
Megan
13
Greg W.
Chuckhoffman
1
Caan/Thay
2
ding an sich
3
Mr. Misery
4
betterthanyoubitch
5
themuse
6
inkahootz
7
TheMeeper
8
Lizzie
9
Friskydingo
10
Meade
11
Conie
12
Megan
13
Greg W.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
men...
()
Date: March 25, 2015 09:55PM
stalking anyone is bad and crazy but stalking men.......?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
GEUUt
()
Date: March 26, 2015 09:38AM
Re: Personal attacks and attempted outing
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: August 07, 2012 12:48AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting
You know how easy it would be to have Scott's house swatted?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: August 07, 2012 12:48AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting
You know how easy it would be to have Scott's house swatted?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh has already lost
()
Date: March 26, 2015 10:50PM
eesh is going to lose in court
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
yetCY
()
Date: March 26, 2015 11:48PM
Shifting Burden of Proof in Civil Cases: Who Gets To Prove What?
In civil cases, the plaintiff starts out with the "burden of proof." This means that the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant did the wrong act. However, once the plaintiff has presented enough evidence to prove this, the burden then shifts to the defendant, who must offer more evidence that he more than likely did not do the act.
In civil cases, the plaintiff starts out with the "burden of proof." This means that the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant did the wrong act. However, once the plaintiff has presented enough evidence to prove this, the burden then shifts to the defendant, who must offer more evidence that he more than likely did not do the act.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ralph Pootaaaaaawn
()
Date: March 27, 2015 09:31AM
yetCY Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> However, once the plaintiff has presented enough
> evidence to prove this, the burden then shifts to
> the defendant, who must offer more evidence that he
> more than likely did not do the act.
-------------------------------------------------------
> However, once the plaintiff has presented enough
> evidence to prove this, the burden then shifts to
> the defendant, who must offer more evidence that he
> more than likely did not do the act.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: March 27, 2015 05:42PM
hm4mbO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think you're retarded and don't understand
> what's going on at all
i think you never had a girlfriend
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think you're retarded and don't understand
> what's going on at all
i think you never had a girlfriend
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HKn7U
()
Date: March 27, 2015 05:55PM
Juxtaposition Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> hm4mbO Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > I think you're retarded and don't understand
> > what's going on at all
>
> i think you never had a girlfriend
are you 12?
-------------------------------------------------------
> hm4mbO Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > I think you're retarded and don't understand
> > what's going on at all
>
> i think you never had a girlfriend
are you 12?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
sadf
()
Date: April 01, 2015 10:27AM
attention whore lizzie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I went to work on a retard farm not because I
> can't hold a job and had nowhere to go, but just
> because I'm a good gal.
>
Or it was court ordered community service.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I went to work on a retard farm not because I
> can't hold a job and had nowhere to go, but just
> because I'm a good gal.
>
Or it was court ordered community service.
Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
you swatted
()
Date: April 05, 2015 09:59PM
We know
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
We know
()
Date: April 05, 2015 10:00PM
You swatted
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ode to Eesh
()
Date: April 10, 2015 06:25PM
There once was a punk ass bitch named Eesh who lived in a lonesome shoe. Poor Basl up & court & didn't know what the fuck to do.
Judge Judy yelled at him thus putting him in his place...Bitch didn't no what to do or say, all red in the face.
She threw out some legal terminolgy - mo fo so scared seemed as if his ass need instant psychology.
Come on Basl you letting her shout at you like that? All he could he do was sit there all pretty & fat.
Leiser snickered, laughed & shook his head. Yes, Basl Boy consider yourself dead.
Your answers to the court were hilarious as hell. Where did you find your lawyer, oh do tell? Looking up his record, he is as crooked as can be. Eesh, Basl, Michael......you're fucked, can't you see?
The postings, the tauntings, the vandalism, everything you have done, all against the law. No, no buddy boy the Morenos will not withdraw.
Be prepare for the long legal ride. Is daddy going to be in court by your side? But don't you punk out, don't you cry. When your ass is convicted, we'll all wave bye bye.
Judge Judy yelled at him thus putting him in his place...Bitch didn't no what to do or say, all red in the face.
She threw out some legal terminolgy - mo fo so scared seemed as if his ass need instant psychology.
Come on Basl you letting her shout at you like that? All he could he do was sit there all pretty & fat.
Leiser snickered, laughed & shook his head. Yes, Basl Boy consider yourself dead.
Your answers to the court were hilarious as hell. Where did you find your lawyer, oh do tell? Looking up his record, he is as crooked as can be. Eesh, Basl, Michael......you're fucked, can't you see?
The postings, the tauntings, the vandalism, everything you have done, all against the law. No, no buddy boy the Morenos will not withdraw.
Be prepare for the long legal ride. Is daddy going to be in court by your side? But don't you punk out, don't you cry. When your ass is convicted, we'll all wave bye bye.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 10, 2015 06:37PM
Oh and Lizzie was indeed subpoenaed for Misery.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 10, 2015 06:37PM
Subpeanoa for a witness and then starting my own lawsuit and some others are too!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 10, 2015 06:54PM
Lizzie I don't know if you saw where I posted the proxy used to harrass me. It may be eesh or Caan but I am sure leiser would have the ip if the same person harrassed Moreno and I have a voice clip too.
Despite our differences please be safe due to how unstable certain people have proven to be at times.
Despite our differences please be safe due to how unstable certain people have proven to be at times.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 10, 2015 06:58PM
Picture of the proxy in original posting as related to me by Cary. http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?40,file=181614,filename=image.jpg
Then the voice clip was here ::
https://www.icloud.com/photostream/#AB532ODWGLVtHE
It may be Caan though, I think you'd know eesh a voice however.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2015 06:58PM by Megynlynn.
Then the voice clip was here ::
https://www.icloud.com/photostream/#AB532ODWGLVtHE
It may be Caan though, I think you'd know eesh a voice however.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2015 06:58PM by Megynlynn.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
slick willy
()
Date: April 10, 2015 07:10PM
I think its caan. Eesh has a twisted and often failed attempt at humor in his actions. More like being way too mischevious and fucking with people
Caan has a rage within him. His stuff reeks of hate. He has a history of harassment and a family history of mental health issues. A predator in training
Caan has a rage within him. His stuff reeks of hate. He has a history of harassment and a family history of mental health issues. A predator in training
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: April 10, 2015 07:23PM
HKn7U Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> are you 12?
yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about you?
chickenshit
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> are you 12?
yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about you?
chickenshit
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 10, 2015 11:40PM
Read your PM Megan!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie trash
()
Date: April 10, 2015 11:59PM
Yeah Megan. Its all good. Till you turn around and she sticks the knife in your back. Everything she does has an angle to it
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
legal question
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:50AM
Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would I have the option of telling the courts, thanks but no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case and whatnot.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eat some worms
()
Date: April 11, 2015 07:31AM
I see the Easter Truce is over.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
kizzey kinte
()
Date: April 11, 2015 08:01AM
legal question Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would I
> have the option of telling the courts, thanks but
> no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case and
> whatnot.
Like you didn't speak to him about it already and tell him what you knew
-------------------------------------------------------
> Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would I
> have the option of telling the courts, thanks but
> no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case and
> whatnot.
Like you didn't speak to him about it already and tell him what you knew
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Leagle Eagel.
()
Date: April 11, 2015 10:45AM
legal question Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would I
> have the option of telling the courts, thanks but
> no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case and
> whatnot.
Nope. A subpoena is a court order, and failing to comply with a court order is contempt of court, which can lead to fines or even jail time, depending on how grumpy the judge is that day.
What the judge will likely do is issue a bench warrant, so the next time you're pulled over by the cops and they run your license, instead of just getting a ticket and going on your merry way, they will instead cart you off to the ADC where you get to sit in the world's worst waiting room for a few hours or days until you can go before the judge.
Further, you're compelled to tell the truth if the subpoena is for a deposition. Lying during a deposition is the same as lying during a trial or other hearing; it's perjury, which is a Class 5 felony in the Commonwealth.
See http://litigation.findlaw.com/going-to-court/what-is-a-subpoena.html and https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-434
-------------------------------------------------------
> Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would I
> have the option of telling the courts, thanks but
> no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case and
> whatnot.
Nope. A subpoena is a court order, and failing to comply with a court order is contempt of court, which can lead to fines or even jail time, depending on how grumpy the judge is that day.
What the judge will likely do is issue a bench warrant, so the next time you're pulled over by the cops and they run your license, instead of just getting a ticket and going on your merry way, they will instead cart you off to the ADC where you get to sit in the world's worst waiting room for a few hours or days until you can go before the judge.
Further, you're compelled to tell the truth if the subpoena is for a deposition. Lying during a deposition is the same as lying during a trial or other hearing; it's perjury, which is a Class 5 felony in the Commonwealth.
See http://litigation.findlaw.com/going-to-court/what-is-a-subpoena.html and https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-434
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
legal question
()
Date: April 11, 2015 01:18PM
Leagle Eagel. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> legal question Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would
> I
> > have the option of telling the courts, thanks
> but
> > no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case
> and
> > whatnot.
>
> Nope. A subpoena is a court order, and failing to
> comply with a court order is contempt of court,
> which can lead to fines or even jail time,
> depending on how grumpy the judge is that day.
>
> What the judge will likely do is issue a bench
> warrant, so the next time you're pulled over by
> the cops and they run your license, instead of
> just getting a ticket and going on your merry way,
> they will instead cart you off to the ADC where
> you get to sit in the world's worst waiting room
> for a few hours or days until you can go before
> the judge.
>
> Further, you're compelled to tell the truth if the
> subpoena is for a deposition. Lying during a
> deposition is the same as lying during a trial or
> other hearing; it's perjury, which is a Class 5
> felony in the Commonwealth.
>
> See
> http://litigation.findlaw.com/going-to-court/what-
> is-a-subpoena.html and
> https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+c
> od+18.2-434
Thank you for the very informative response my good sir.
I guess what I was getting at was to what extent can subpoenas be served or given out, eg if the accusing party had enough money, could half this site end up being called into court over a petty personal dispute?
Is there any sort of limiting factor to a lawyers ability to get court orders?
This is all rather interesting to me, it seems like you can really wreak havoc on peoples lives in this sort of case
-------------------------------------------------------
> legal question Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Theoretically, if I were to be subpoenaed, would
> I
> > have the option of telling the courts, thanks
> but
> > no thanks? you know, since it's a civil case
> and
> > whatnot.
>
> Nope. A subpoena is a court order, and failing to
> comply with a court order is contempt of court,
> which can lead to fines or even jail time,
> depending on how grumpy the judge is that day.
>
> What the judge will likely do is issue a bench
> warrant, so the next time you're pulled over by
> the cops and they run your license, instead of
> just getting a ticket and going on your merry way,
> they will instead cart you off to the ADC where
> you get to sit in the world's worst waiting room
> for a few hours or days until you can go before
> the judge.
>
> Further, you're compelled to tell the truth if the
> subpoena is for a deposition. Lying during a
> deposition is the same as lying during a trial or
> other hearing; it's perjury, which is a Class 5
> felony in the Commonwealth.
>
> See
> http://litigation.findlaw.com/going-to-court/what-
> is-a-subpoena.html and
> https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+c
> od+18.2-434
Thank you for the very informative response my good sir.
I guess what I was getting at was to what extent can subpoenas be served or given out, eg if the accusing party had enough money, could half this site end up being called into court over a petty personal dispute?
Is there any sort of limiting factor to a lawyers ability to get court orders?
This is all rather interesting to me, it seems like you can really wreak havoc on peoples lives in this sort of case
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Vp9N4
()
Date: April 11, 2015 01:39PM
User Profile : eesh
Email: Hidden
Real Name: Jake the Alligator Man
Posts: 53,292
Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
Last Activity: 04/11/2015 01:20PM
Email: Hidden
Real Name: Jake the Alligator Man
Posts: 53,292
Registered: 07/23/2009 12:10PM
Last Activity: 04/11/2015 01:20PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Very Entertaining
()
Date: April 11, 2015 01:46PM
There is nothing like watching a bunch of room temperature IQ individuals slinging crap at one another, and filing meaning lawsuits that will never result in ultimately collecting meaningful damages.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
4EW99
()
Date: April 11, 2015 02:00PM
it's not about money
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megan nailed Eesh's coffin
()
Date: April 11, 2015 02:08PM
Megynlynn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh and Lizzie was indeed subpoenaed for Misery.
Megan gave up information Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megan sent all the pm's and emails Megan and Mo
> had to Moreno, she didn't want to be involved but
> gave up what knowledge she did have to hold eesh
> accountable. This in turn gave him the knowledge
> she had on eesh. Joshua isn't involved in this and
> Megan won't be a witness because she already
> handed over all she had that was relevant. This
> information ultimately led to Monique benign
> called as a witness against eesh.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1825145/1836673.html#msg-1836673
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh and Lizzie was indeed subpoenaed for Misery.
Megan gave up information Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megan sent all the pm's and emails Megan and Mo
> had to Moreno, she didn't want to be involved but
> gave up what knowledge she did have to hold eesh
> accountable. This in turn gave him the knowledge
> she had on eesh. Joshua isn't involved in this and
> Megan won't be a witness because she already
> handed over all she had that was relevant. This
> information ultimately led to Monique benign
> called as a witness against eesh.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1825145/1836673.html#msg-1836673
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Wtp9d
()
Date: April 11, 2015 02:26PM
welp he's really going to stalk and harass megan now
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 11, 2015 02:37PM
Wtp9d Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> welp he's really going to stalk and harass megan
> now
I would hope with the open investigation about me being stalked recently, compiled with everything this Moreno case is becoming that he would be smarter than that.
-------------------------------------------------------
> welp he's really going to stalk and harass megan
> now
I would hope with the open investigation about me being stalked recently, compiled with everything this Moreno case is becoming that he would be smarter than that.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh smart?
()
Date: April 11, 2015 03:59PM
when has that ever stopped him before?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KuD3W
()
Date: April 11, 2015 04:25PM
Juxtaposition Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HKn7U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> > are you 12?
>
> yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about
> you?
> chickenshit
shhhhhhh! the adults are posting now
-------------------------------------------------------
> HKn7U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> > are you 12?
>
> yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about
> you?
> chickenshit
shhhhhhh! the adults are posting now
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh admitted to swatting to Liz
()
Date: April 11, 2015 05:28PM
Was Eesh drunk when he posted this?
"I told you to leave me and my family alone and I'd never tell how you admitted to me to swatting Miz or sending those death threats to yourself"
I think if Lizzie wanted everyone to know he told her she would have posted this on the forum herself. Eesh, you talk too much and that's going to be your downfall. You have never once denied telling Lizzie anything and the way you kissed her ass all over the place after court made it very obvious something had changed.
You called the police on her and called Papa John's after finding out she would have to testify against you shows how malicious you are and that you're trying to do anything you can to fuck with her so she doesn't tell. Did you tell the police and Papa John's that she is testifying against you in a stalking and harassment lawsuit?
I would never want Lizzie as an enemy, Megan either. You're just of much of a vindictive bitch as they are, but they have a reason to come after you. What did Lizzie or Megan ever do to you to deserve what you've done to them?
How does it feel for the two females who you victimized so badly for no reason on here are going to be the reason you going jail? Perhaps prison?
You can keep pretending that you aren't worried and making jokes of this entire thing but everyone knows you're freaking out and people are absolutely loving every minute of it.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I missed out
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:18PM
Oh, there is another FEMALE he has to watch out for, also. Just stand by folks !!!!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xhx3H
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:22PM
4EW99 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> it's not about money
That would be correct. It is all about stupidity. This whole situation is beyond absurd. If it were a reality show it would be called "Who is the Biggest Moron?"
-------------------------------------------------------
> it's not about money
That would be correct. It is all about stupidity. This whole situation is beyond absurd. If it were a reality show it would be called "Who is the Biggest Moron?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Biggest Moron
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:29PM
Eesh for trusting Lizzie and telling her he swatted Misery.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not the northman
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:40PM
Biggest Moron Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh for trusting Lizzie and telling her he
> swatted Misery.
no proof or mo would have plastered this place with it
think "DASHCAMS" and how much bullshit that was
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh for trusting Lizzie and telling her he
> swatted Misery.
no proof or mo would have plastered this place with it
think "DASHCAMS" and how much bullshit that was
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dUTPp
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:41PM
if someone did to eesh what he has done to so many others someone would be dead by now
don't rule that out though he's a man with nothing to lose at this point
he is only going to escalate further now
be on high alert
don't rule that out though he's a man with nothing to lose at this point
he is only going to escalate further now
be on high alert
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
73hP9
()
Date: April 11, 2015 06:44PM
not the northman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Biggest Moron Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh for trusting Lizzie and telling her he
> > swatted Misery.
>
>
> no proof or mo would have plastered this place
> with it
>
> think "DASHCAMS" and how much bullshit that was
think he told her in person
the pm says "i told you id never tell"
she didn't
megan implicated her
-------------------------------------------------------
> Biggest Moron Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh for trusting Lizzie and telling her he
> > swatted Misery.
>
>
> no proof or mo would have plastered this place
> with it
>
> think "DASHCAMS" and how much bullshit that was
think he told her in person
the pm says "i told you id never tell"
she didn't
megan implicated her
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
hwHtj
()
Date: April 12, 2015 01:23PM
Lizzie holds Eesh's life in her hands and he tried to interfere with her own case before he found out this was Megan's doing. He's not the smartest guy in the world as we've seen lately. To piss off someone who is testifying against you and holds the key to whether or not your freedom is taken away is the last thing you want to do. He already posted her private message publicly her saying what happened so she can't take that back now. He's sealed his fate. Goodbye guy.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
oxymoron
()
Date: April 12, 2015 02:07PM
what life?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
idiots at large
()
Date: April 12, 2015 04:29PM
What a bunch of fools and waste of taxpayer money.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stupid is as stupid does
()
Date: April 12, 2015 09:14PM
idiots at large Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a bunch of fools and waste of taxpayer money.
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a bunch of fools and waste of taxpayer money.
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Agrees with Guy Above
()
Date: April 13, 2015 09:47AM
All 3 of these dummies need to be thrown in prison.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Michael Josef Mengele
()
Date: April 13, 2015 10:51AM
Agrees with Guy Above Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All 3 of these dummies need to be thrown in
> prison.
...and made into a human centipede.
-------------------------------------------------------
> All 3 of these dummies need to be thrown in
> prison.
...and made into a human centipede.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
/
()
Date: April 13, 2015 12:36PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I
> would be watching YOUR every post to see how I
> could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty
> of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about
> what Eesh has told you about the whole situation.
> And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
>
> Eesh should not be talking to ANYONE about this
> stuff except his attorney, his psychologist or
> psychiatrist, or his spouse (if he has one), for
> they are the only ones who would be precluded from
> being hauled into a courtroom (or a law office, in
> the case of a deposition) as a witness in this case.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I
> would be watching YOUR every post to see how I
> could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty
> of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about
> what Eesh has told you about the whole situation.
> And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
>
> Eesh should not be talking to ANYONE about this
> stuff except his attorney, his psychologist or
> psychiatrist, or his spouse (if he has one), for
> they are the only ones who would be precluded from
> being hauled into a courtroom (or a law office, in
> the case of a deposition) as a witness in this case.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tcjm7
()
Date: April 13, 2015 12:46PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I
> would be watching YOUR every post to see how I
> could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty
> of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about
> what Eesh has told you about the whole situation.
> And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lizzie:
>
> And for yourself, if I was Misery's attorney, I
> would be watching YOUR every post to see how I
> could depose YOU and force you, under the penalty
> of perjury if you are untruthful, to testify about
> what Eesh has told you about the whole situation.
> And so, you could well become a witness in this case.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lizzy the Teen Toucher
()
Date: April 13, 2015 01:54PM
Eesh will be fine. Lizzy has some delusions about being important, so she constantly posts about her power in the situation, lying about everything. Eesh however, seems pretty straight up and I don't question him posting the pm at all. It's the truth and it's what happened. That crazy bitch sent him that crazy message.
I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of those things. Because she's stupid, and not well mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs to megan (not megans response, just her accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
If she had any proof or info, she would have posted it or saved it for court, instead of constantly fishing for incriminating info like she does when she only had baseless accusations. Example: "I got you on my dashcam!" When we come to find out a neighbor saw a man and texted her and she has no clue who it was and saw nothing.
I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of those things. Because she's stupid, and not well mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs to megan (not megans response, just her accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
If she had any proof or info, she would have posted it or saved it for court, instead of constantly fishing for incriminating info like she does when she only had baseless accusations. Example: "I got you on my dashcam!" When we come to find out a neighbor saw a man and texted her and she has no clue who it was and saw nothing.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ain't nobody got time for that
()
Date: April 13, 2015 02:18PM
Everything you just said was wrong LOLOLOL
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CjkU3
()
Date: April 13, 2015 02:23PM
eesh showed his guilt by contacting papa johns before he found out lizzie didn't even do anything and it was megan who made her a witness
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh posting anon
()
Date: April 13, 2015 02:27PM
Lizzy the Teen Toucher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh will be fine. Lizzy has some delusions about
> being important, so she constantly posts about her
> power in the situation, lying about everything.
> Eesh however, seems pretty straight up and I don't
> question him posting the pm at all. It's the truth
> and it's what happened. That crazy bitch sent him
> that crazy message.
That's what he wants you to think. "Look why would I show this" eesh is not clever.
> I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of
> posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of
> those things. Because she's stupid, and not well
> mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs
> to megan (not megans response, just her
> accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
Stupid and not well mentally is eesh saying she's doing this for free legal counsel from the Moreno lawyer when that was proven to be a lie.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh will be fine. Lizzy has some delusions about
> being important, so she constantly posts about her
> power in the situation, lying about everything.
> Eesh however, seems pretty straight up and I don't
> question him posting the pm at all. It's the truth
> and it's what happened. That crazy bitch sent him
> that crazy message.
That's what he wants you to think. "Look why would I show this" eesh is not clever.
> I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of
> posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of
> those things. Because she's stupid, and not well
> mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs
> to megan (not megans response, just her
> accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
Stupid and not well mentally is eesh saying she's doing this for free legal counsel from the Moreno lawyer when that was proven to be a lie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
You scared huh?
()
Date: April 13, 2015 02:53PM
LMAO! Bitch got so scared after he saw my mom he had to go the back way into the lawyer office! Omg this is too great! I'll upload the video of how he parked next to us, didn't realize it was us, saw my mom got scared and drove off!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 13, 2015 03:03PM
Good luck today, per our conversation I'd thought I'd let you know Mo.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lizzy the Teen Toucher
()
Date: April 13, 2015 03:50PM
Right, a bunch of bullshit anon posts from Lizzy has convinced me that she is completely mentally well lol
So obsessive while saying nothing of value. Exactly the person I described above
So obsessive while saying nothing of value. Exactly the person I described above
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I cried
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:25PM
It went great today. eesh's contacting of Katie was indeed deemed as "Witness Intimidation" and that carries yet another charge. Unfortunately this went on for 3 hours and I missed my appointment with my lawyer to give her information on eesh to pass along to Katie's lawyer but we've rescheduled for later in the week.
eesh's lawyer cross examined me and asked me if I "took cocaine" when I left for recess and went out to speak with the Moreno family LMFAO!
What kind of lawyer asks that? I asked him "Are you going to write to the jury in this case too"
EVERYONE had a good laugh with that one! He wanted to try to bring up my credibity. Haha. I have no reason to lie on eesh. I'm getting nothing out of this and I made sure eesh knew how wrong he was when he said I was getting "free legal cousel" for my case.
Yep. You were proven to be the liar here, not me.
Now tell everyone how I cried about when I told them how you had them swatted so that Moreno would be shot dead.
eesh's lawyer cross examined me and asked me if I "took cocaine" when I left for recess and went out to speak with the Moreno family LMFAO!
What kind of lawyer asks that? I asked him "Are you going to write to the jury in this case too"
EVERYONE had a good laugh with that one! He wanted to try to bring up my credibity. Haha. I have no reason to lie on eesh. I'm getting nothing out of this and I made sure eesh knew how wrong he was when he said I was getting "free legal cousel" for my case.
Yep. You were proven to be the liar here, not me.
Now tell everyone how I cried about when I told them how you had them swatted so that Moreno would be shot dead.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
We all had a good laugh
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:33PM
We all really had a good laugh when eesh's lawyer asked me "Have you ever told Mr. Basl to kill himself"
I answered truthfully and said "Yes. Just the other night I told him to take his life because everyone is tried of his shit"
I also mentioned how there was a thread posted about "Click here if you want eesh to kill himself" and how it was clicked over 100 thousand times.
Everyone again laughed including eesh's lawyer himself.
To sum it up, my credibity, my past, my criminal record and what I've done on this site has nothing to do with what eesh has done here. I'm not the one on trail and neither is Miz.
Say whatever you want about me. I was told "You held your own" and I put eesh and his lawyer in his place.
He really didn't know how to act when I brought up how he had written to a grand jury in the past to sway a jury's opinion.
You fucked with the wrong bitch. You can say I'm crazy, mentally ill, a criminal a nigger or whatever but I get nothing out of testifying against eesh.
And lmao he tried to bring up that I said I was having Lesier represent him in the lawsuit we're filing against him.
I haven't even discussed that with the firm but it has been discussed.
So good luck with that being some "smoking gun" to discredit me.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
I answered truthfully and said "Yes. Just the other night I told him to take his life because everyone is tried of his shit"
I also mentioned how there was a thread posted about "Click here if you want eesh to kill himself" and how it was clicked over 100 thousand times.
Everyone again laughed including eesh's lawyer himself.
To sum it up, my credibity, my past, my criminal record and what I've done on this site has nothing to do with what eesh has done here. I'm not the one on trail and neither is Miz.
Say whatever you want about me. I was told "You held your own" and I put eesh and his lawyer in his place.
He really didn't know how to act when I brought up how he had written to a grand jury in the past to sway a jury's opinion.
You fucked with the wrong bitch. You can say I'm crazy, mentally ill, a criminal a nigger or whatever but I get nothing out of testifying against eesh.
And lmao he tried to bring up that I said I was having Lesier represent him in the lawsuit we're filing against him.
I haven't even discussed that with the firm but it has been discussed.
So good luck with that being some "smoking gun" to discredit me.
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cokehead
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:38PM
Everything eesh's lawyer asked me I was able to prove.
Every lie eesh told I was able to discredit.
His lawyer was also very late to the hearing. So professional. Just as professional as writing to a grand jury to sway their opinion LOL!
Now, we'll wait for him to get on here and write a long novel about how everything went in his favor like he did with the CourtObserver thread.
I may have appeared like a firecracker, a crazy "bipolar" bitch but I knew exactly what the fuck I was doing, talking about and put some motherfuckers in their places this afternoon.
What do you have to say sbout me testimony eesh? We are all dying to hear about it.
We're all also dying to hear about how you parked besides us and then moved once you saw my mom LOL!
Every lie eesh told I was able to discredit.
His lawyer was also very late to the hearing. So professional. Just as professional as writing to a grand jury to sway their opinion LOL!
Now, we'll wait for him to get on here and write a long novel about how everything went in his favor like he did with the CourtObserver thread.
I may have appeared like a firecracker, a crazy "bipolar" bitch but I knew exactly what the fuck I was doing, talking about and put some motherfuckers in their places this afternoon.
What do you have to say sbout me testimony eesh? We are all dying to hear about it.
We're all also dying to hear about how you parked besides us and then moved once you saw my mom LOL!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Outings
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:40PM
"Have you ever outed anyone before"
"Yes I have"
LOL
Who lied bitch? Not me!
"Yes I have"
LOL
Who lied bitch? Not me!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
No hard feelings
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:45PM
Megynlynn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good luck today, per our conversation I'd thought
> I'd let you know Mo.
I hope you're doing okay. Thanks for the well wishes and thanks again for what you did. I understand now and there's no hard feelings. This had to happen.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good luck today, per our conversation I'd thought
> I'd let you know Mo.
I hope you're doing okay. Thanks for the well wishes and thanks again for what you did. I understand now and there's no hard feelings. This had to happen.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Driving away after seeing my mom
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:52PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Funny ass private messages
()
Date: April 13, 2015 07:54PM
I had some pretty damning shit to show and say and lol there was some really hilarious moments when I had to share private messages between eesh and I but I'll let him tell you all about those.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Just being myself
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:02PM
Oh and lmao! I couldn't help but laughing at the incompetence of eesh's lawyer's cross examination and he said "Is something funny?" And I said "YES! You're asking REALLY stupid questions" lmao!
Piss poor ass cross examination. It wasn't even a cross examination all it mostly was - was questions about my criminal record lol!
Piss poor ass cross examination. It wasn't even a cross examination all it mostly was - was questions about my criminal record lol!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Biggest surprise
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:22PM
And oh man! The biggest thing to me was Mr. Misery is NOT a bad looking guy at all! Looks much better than eesh!
-waits for predictable lizzie & Misery getting together later posts
-waits for predictable lizzie & Misery getting together later posts
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
You were made out to be the liar
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:27PM
Please go ahead and tell everyone how you lied and were wrong when you said I was promised "free legal representation" for testifying against you.
I declined on getting a copy of the transcript after the hearing but I've contacted the firm to let them know I that in fact do want one.
I declined on getting a copy of the transcript after the hearing but I've contacted the firm to let them know I that in fact do want one.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
AoBAB
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:34PM
I just found this site, and I'm intrigued. Can someone tell me from scratch what is going on here?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
No
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:47PM
No
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Who's got credibity issues?
()
Date: April 13, 2015 08:55PM
Re: eesh's actual lawyer: Neil Kuchinsky
Posted by: Professional Misconduct ()
Date: March 25, 2015 01:18AM
Mr. Kuchinsky's improper and possibly criminal contact with the prospective grand jurors.
https://www.vsb.org/disciplinary_orders/kuchinsky_opinion.pdf
Posted by: Professional Misconduct ()
Date: March 25, 2015 01:18AM
Mr. Kuchinsky's improper and possibly criminal contact with the prospective grand jurors.
https://www.vsb.org/disciplinary_orders/kuchinsky_opinion.pdf
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Juxtaposition
()
Date: April 13, 2015 09:46PM
KuD3W Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > are you 12?
> >
> > yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how
> about
> > you?
> > chickenshit
>
>
> shhhhhhh! the adults are posting now
it'd be different if I've seen something which would make me to believe anything different ..like say pictures of a basement flooded or perhaps a door or window being broken into or something that's other than comical to me. I've seen nothing different besides anonymous postings to change my mind. she says he says ..
-------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > are you 12?
> >
> > yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how
> about
> > you?
> > chickenshit
>
>
> shhhhhhh! the adults are posting now
it'd be different if I've seen something which would make me to believe anything different ..like say pictures of a basement flooded or perhaps a door or window being broken into or something that's other than comical to me. I've seen nothing different besides anonymous postings to change my mind. she says he says ..
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MCDP3
()
Date: April 13, 2015 09:50PM
So much support!
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KkvY3
()
Date: April 13, 2015 11:27PM
after a stressful day of losing to the moreno and wells family and being put in his place by lizzie not even driving past Megan's house could ease his anger he has to post porn to remind himself of another thing he loses out on in life
sex
sex
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Crazy long
()
Date: April 13, 2015 11:45PM
If the deposition lasted three hours I can only imagine how Thursday in Richmond will be and the lawsuit in January OMG it's gonna be more than four days
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mWcMH
()
Date: April 14, 2015 01:11AM
why do you care so much about what posters here think liz?
seems kind of stupid to constantly say you do not give a fuck and then spend all your time here repeating yourself over and over
seems kind of stupid to constantly say you do not give a fuck and then spend all your time here repeating yourself over and over
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Oh I care alright!
()
Date: April 14, 2015 01:18AM
I don't lie on people and I would like to not be lied on. I'll be able to prove you wrong like I always do.
I will discredit, debunk and poke holes and beat you down with common sense if need be.
It's really simple.
If what and how I type bothers you - don't read anything pertaining to me.
It's really that simple.
Don't read anything I type if it bothers you.
Simple, it is. Really!
:)
I will discredit, debunk and poke holes and beat you down with common sense if need be.
It's really simple.
If what and how I type bothers you - don't read anything pertaining to me.
It's really that simple.
Don't read anything I type if it bothers you.
Simple, it is. Really!
:)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Oh and by the way
()
Date: April 14, 2015 01:36AM
"Did you take cocaine?"
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The Witness
()
Date: April 14, 2015 03:39AM
Lizzy the Teen Toucher Wrote:
Hi dumbass. Are you calling me a teen toucher because I got to touch a 19 year old that you could only dream of doing anything with?
Yeah. I'd be jealous too if the bitch didn't end up being crazier and more of a liar than I could ever have imagined.
Last time I checked 18 was legal and 19 is more than 18 so you're trying to imply something dirty here shows how jealous you are. Oh yeah Katie's hot alright and you wish you could have her. Keep dreaming, bitch!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh will be fine.
He most certainly isn't and won't be.
>Lizzy has some delusions about
> being important, so she constantly posts about her
> power in the situation, lying about everything.
Now can you please point out these delusions. I'm sure if I wasn't important I wouldn't be invovled in this at all.
And what have I lied about? I have quite a bit of power in this situation but I wasn't even the one who went about doing this so please don't ever speak on things you don't know.
I get tired of proving people wrong. I wish I got paid for it. I did enough of that earlier. Just stop thinking you know about a situation that you have no part in.
> Eesh however, seems pretty straight up and I don't
> question him posting the pm at all. It's the truth
> and it's what happened. That crazy bitch sent him
> that crazy message.
Oh does he? Ask him how the Moreno lawyer asked me under oath if they have ever spoken to me about my legal charges. I sent him that PM and there was nothing crazy about it.
The only thing crazy here is a man driving over 100 miles to go to people's houses. Having them swatted in the hopes of having someone killed. Sending death threats to themselves and having someone arrested.
And then telling the one main bitch who told him many times that I would get him back for everything he's done to me and my family.
Yeah, none of that's crazy, right? LMAO!!!
> I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of
> posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of
> those thing.
You think that because you're a dumbass just like eesh or you are eesh or maybe you're his lawyer lmao! If I wanted that information on here I would have POSTED IT ON HERE MYSELF! Loooong ago!
Oh but he's guilty of these things. He knows it. God knows it and his mother who's watching this knows it too.
Because she's stupid, and not well
> mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs
> to megan (not megans response, just her
> accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
I'm stupid? How am I stupid? Let me tell you what stupid is.
Stupid is getting freaked out about what I would say and then contacting the girl in my case and asking to be a witness for HER! LMFAOOOOOO!
Not realizing that what he's done is actually a CRIME! It's called "Witness Intimiation" and that went on the record today! If he contacts her again he's in so much more trouble it's not even funny.
> If she had any proof or info, she would have
> posted it or saved it for court, instead of
> constantly fishing for incriminating info like she
> does when she only had baseless accusations.
Okay. I did just that. I saved it for the court. I had no reason to post it because eesh are I were cool until recently and so I sent that to HIM and he posted it like an idiot hoping to get more replies like yours.
Too bad you're not smart enough to see through his little manipulation and mind games. I've been dealing with this guy long enough to know how he works and predict his every next move.
> Example: "I got you on my dashcam!" When we come
> to find out a neighbor saw a man and texted her
> and she has no clue who it was and saw nothing.
He got his tags and described him head to toe. I can say Dashcam, house cam, whatever, it matters none.
Any other stupid shit for me to debunk? I love it!
Hi dumbass. Are you calling me a teen toucher because I got to touch a 19 year old that you could only dream of doing anything with?
Yeah. I'd be jealous too if the bitch didn't end up being crazier and more of a liar than I could ever have imagined.
Last time I checked 18 was legal and 19 is more than 18 so you're trying to imply something dirty here shows how jealous you are. Oh yeah Katie's hot alright and you wish you could have her. Keep dreaming, bitch!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh will be fine.
He most certainly isn't and won't be.
>Lizzy has some delusions about
> being important, so she constantly posts about her
> power in the situation, lying about everything.
Now can you please point out these delusions. I'm sure if I wasn't important I wouldn't be invovled in this at all.
And what have I lied about? I have quite a bit of power in this situation but I wasn't even the one who went about doing this so please don't ever speak on things you don't know.
I get tired of proving people wrong. I wish I got paid for it. I did enough of that earlier. Just stop thinking you know about a situation that you have no part in.
> Eesh however, seems pretty straight up and I don't
> question him posting the pm at all. It's the truth
> and it's what happened. That crazy bitch sent him
> that crazy message.
Oh does he? Ask him how the Moreno lawyer asked me under oath if they have ever spoken to me about my legal charges. I sent him that PM and there was nothing crazy about it.
The only thing crazy here is a man driving over 100 miles to go to people's houses. Having them swatted in the hopes of having someone killed. Sending death threats to themselves and having someone arrested.
And then telling the one main bitch who told him many times that I would get him back for everything he's done to me and my family.
Yeah, none of that's crazy, right? LMAO!!!
> I think Lizzy sent that pm with the intentions of
> posting it later, as proof that eesh is guilty of
> those thing.
You think that because you're a dumbass just like eesh or you are eesh or maybe you're his lawyer lmao! If I wanted that information on here I would have POSTED IT ON HERE MYSELF! Loooong ago!
Oh but he's guilty of these things. He knows it. God knows it and his mother who's watching this knows it too.
Because she's stupid, and not well
> mentally. She's already made some posts of her PMs
> to megan (not megans response, just her
> accusations) as "proof" that megan did things.
I'm stupid? How am I stupid? Let me tell you what stupid is.
Stupid is getting freaked out about what I would say and then contacting the girl in my case and asking to be a witness for HER! LMFAOOOOOO!
Not realizing that what he's done is actually a CRIME! It's called "Witness Intimiation" and that went on the record today! If he contacts her again he's in so much more trouble it's not even funny.
> If she had any proof or info, she would have
> posted it or saved it for court, instead of
> constantly fishing for incriminating info like she
> does when she only had baseless accusations.
Okay. I did just that. I saved it for the court. I had no reason to post it because eesh are I were cool until recently and so I sent that to HIM and he posted it like an idiot hoping to get more replies like yours.
Too bad you're not smart enough to see through his little manipulation and mind games. I've been dealing with this guy long enough to know how he works and predict his every next move.
> Example: "I got you on my dashcam!" When we come
> to find out a neighbor saw a man and texted her
> and she has no clue who it was and saw nothing.
He got his tags and described him head to toe. I can say Dashcam, house cam, whatever, it matters none.
Any other stupid shit for me to debunk? I love it!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HKn7U
()
Date: April 14, 2015 03:47AM
Juxtaposition Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HKn7U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> > are you 12?
>
> yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about
> you?
> chickenshit
I'm 14, so there.
ya BIG FAT chickenshit
-------------------------------------------------------
> HKn7U Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> > are you 12?
>
> yea, i'm 12 and i post on this website, how about
> you?
> chickenshit
I'm 14, so there.
ya BIG FAT chickenshit
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
i got this bridge
()
Date: April 14, 2015 04:14AM
This is all BULLSHIT
No one involved in criminal proceedings or civil lawsuits associated with this website would be posting here.
(and would you assholes PLEASE stop posting the dumbass GIANT cellphone screenshots- it's stupid)
No one involved in criminal proceedings or civil lawsuits associated with this website would be posting here.
(and would you assholes PLEASE stop posting the dumbass GIANT cellphone screenshots- it's stupid)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not illegal
()
Date: April 14, 2015 10:08AM
says who? we've seen both parties still posting here.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I wasn't molested but...........
()
Date: April 14, 2015 03:06PM
Michael Basl has no room to talk about anyone and their "molestation jokes"
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
This thread delivers!
()
Date: April 14, 2015 03:12PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh failed miserably
()
Date: April 14, 2015 03:16PM
LOL! Really now Michael Josef Basl!?
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Broom stick
()
Date: April 14, 2015 08:13PM
Michael Josef Basl
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
New development
()
Date: April 15, 2015 06:16PM
Eesh impersonated Mr. Misery's real name and sent death threats to himself and had Mr. Misery arrested.
Eesh knows Mr. Misery would never use his real name here, especially to do something as stupid as to send death threats to Eesh while he has a lawsuit against him.
Eesh also knows that Cary needs a court order to release and ID a poster. Eesh was able to get a computer ignorant magistrate to believe him on this and swore he knew this was Mr. Misery sending him death threats even without a postive ID from Cary.
Being a member of this site for 6 years, Eesh is aware of impersonations of other people on here and yet still went and swore out an arrest.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1839449.html
Eesh knows Mr. Misery would never use his real name here, especially to do something as stupid as to send death threats to Eesh while he has a lawsuit against him.
Eesh also knows that Cary needs a court order to release and ID a poster. Eesh was able to get a computer ignorant magistrate to believe him on this and swore he knew this was Mr. Misery sending him death threats even without a postive ID from Cary.
Being a member of this site for 6 years, Eesh is aware of impersonations of other people on here and yet still went and swore out an arrest.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1839449.html
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
pure speculation
()
Date: April 15, 2015 06:23PM
You are completely speculating on him posting that. But eesh knew it didn't come from misery
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
He's fucked either way
()
Date: April 15, 2015 06:26PM
Not speculating but no matter what - he knew that it didn't come from Misery and still swore out a warrant on his arrest. He can't take it back now and say "Well, I THOUGHT it was him" that would be him speculating. There was no police investigation done or anything done by Cary because the name was made the name day Eesh filed the charges. So knowing how Cary operates this site, he still lied and said he knew for sure who sent the message even though he didn't.
Oh wait, yes he did because he sent it himself.
Oh wait, yes he did because he sent it himself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
not speculation
()
Date: April 15, 2015 06:34PM
He's fucked either way Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He can't take it back now
> and say "Well, I THOUGHT it was him" that would be
> him perjuring himself.
-------------------------------------------------------
> He can't take it back now
> and say "Well, I THOUGHT it was him" that would be
> him perjuring himself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 15, 2015 06:54PM
not speculation Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's fucked either way Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He can't take it back now
> > and say "Well, I THOUGHT it was him" that would
> be
> > him perjuring himself.
It's a violation of va code 18.2-435 if that's what he is going to claim now also a class 5 felony.
Or if he lied in his written statement knowing that's a violation of 18.2-434 subsection b, then when he was sworn in by the magistrate and affirmed those statements he violated 18.2 - 434 subsection D. So both of these which are chargeable in that axe scenario and class five felonies too.
Then any or all of these could/would apply too:
Not to mention as I stated if he reported to police first and got a case number to take to the magistrate then falsely filling a police report.
•§ 18.2-186.4. Use of a person's identity with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass; penalty.
•§ 18.2-461. Falsely summoning or giving false reports to law-enforcement officials.
•§ 18.2-172. Forging, uttering, etc., other writings.
If any person forge any writing, other than such as is mentioned in §§ 18.2-168 and 18.2-170, to the prejudice of another's right, or utter, or attempt to employ as true, such forged writing, knowing it to be forged, he shall be guilty of a Class 5 felony. Any person who shall obtain, by any false pretense or token, the signature of another person, to any such writing, with intent to defraud any other person, shall be deemed guilty of the forgery thereof, and shall be subject to like punishment.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He's fucked either way Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > He can't take it back now
> > and say "Well, I THOUGHT it was him" that would
> be
> > him perjuring himself.
It's a violation of va code 18.2-435 if that's what he is going to claim now also a class 5 felony.
Or if he lied in his written statement knowing that's a violation of 18.2-434 subsection b, then when he was sworn in by the magistrate and affirmed those statements he violated 18.2 - 434 subsection D. So both of these which are chargeable in that axe scenario and class five felonies too.
Then any or all of these could/would apply too:
Not to mention as I stated if he reported to police first and got a case number to take to the magistrate then falsely filling a police report.
•§ 18.2-186.4. Use of a person's identity with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass; penalty.
•§ 18.2-461. Falsely summoning or giving false reports to law-enforcement officials.
•§ 18.2-172. Forging, uttering, etc., other writings.
If any person forge any writing, other than such as is mentioned in §§ 18.2-168 and 18.2-170, to the prejudice of another's right, or utter, or attempt to employ as true, such forged writing, knowing it to be forged, he shall be guilty of a Class 5 felony. Any person who shall obtain, by any false pretense or token, the signature of another person, to any such writing, with intent to defraud any other person, shall be deemed guilty of the forgery thereof, and shall be subject to like punishment.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A pitiful bluff at best
()
Date: April 15, 2015 07:03PM
You would have to say you were in fear for your life to say that you took death threats seriously enough to have someone arrested for it and to get a protective order on them. Does this look like a scared man? A man who shows off his many firearms to everyone on this site?
"Something I've noticed, it's the ones with the biggest grudge against me that are also the least capable of leaving their home. Case in point, Misery and Eli. Misery is absolutely terrified of the world outside Sterling, and Eli doesn't even own a car. All they can do is be keyboard warriors, and this fact only angers them more." - eesh
"he's terrified of driving, of anything outside a ten mile radius of his home, of minorities, of loud noises, etc. He's not driving anywhere. - eesh
The fact that he would say that means it is not going to happen. A pitiful bluff at best. I doubt the older brother even knows about this drama. - eesh
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?""
"Something I've noticed, it's the ones with the biggest grudge against me that are also the least capable of leaving their home. Case in point, Misery and Eli. Misery is absolutely terrified of the world outside Sterling, and Eli doesn't even own a car. All they can do is be keyboard warriors, and this fact only angers them more." - eesh
"he's terrified of driving, of anything outside a ten mile radius of his home, of minorities, of loud noises, etc. He's not driving anywhere. - eesh
The fact that he would say that means it is not going to happen. A pitiful bluff at best. I doubt the older brother even knows about this drama. - eesh
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?""
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Another Goodie
()
Date: April 15, 2015 07:28PM
Usually the people claiming to be victims are the ones perpetrating all the threats and real harassment.-eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Be yourself
()
Date: April 15, 2015 07:43PM
inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh, you are a fucking faggot for intentionally
> pretending to be me.
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh, you are a fucking faggot for intentionally
> pretending to be me.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
How this is all going to look:
()
Date: April 15, 2015 08:54PM
pure speculation Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are completely speculating on him posting
> that. But eesh knew it didn't come from misery
Let's just say for one second that it wasn't eesh.
Now when he goes to court to say that he knew Misery sent him death threats he will be asked "Well, how do you know for sure that they were him?"
What will he say? "Because they were written from his real name!"
Then he will be asked "Well, do you know of any other names this man uses on the site? Has he used his real name prior to Feb 1st, the same date of the name registration and the same date you took out your arrest warrant?"
Will he say: "Yes. Mr. Misery but that was banned and then theres Jimmlegs but the messages were sent from his REAL NAME!"
What will likely be asked next "So you knew he used the name Jimmylegs but the name that was used to message you wasn't Jimmylegs, but his real name? Has he ever used his real name to post before?"
What will be his response to that?
Then the knowledge of eesh knowing full well how poster's have used names to impersonate others will come up. It will be brought up how he's very much aware of how Cary has to have a court order to truly ID a poster and that even knowing this he still didn't go that route and went straight to the authorties without waiting for a postive ID from Cary.
"So you aren't actually 100% sure who was sending you messages but you still decided to go report it and have someone arrested anyway saying that you KNEW it was him?"
Again, this is saying that if it wasn't actually eesh but him knowing all of this and still going and reporting it saying that he knew for a fact who was sending him messages, giving up his information and having the police arrested.
Unless, he did in fact know who was sending the messages and it was him and he knew he could fool a magistrate because most aren't too savvy on this internet thing and he knew he would get what he wanted for the time being.
Not realizing that an actual investigation would be done and Misery's IP can probably show he didn't send the messages and that once this happens it won't he Misery having to worry about any conviction or charges.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are completely speculating on him posting
> that. But eesh knew it didn't come from misery
Let's just say for one second that it wasn't eesh.
Now when he goes to court to say that he knew Misery sent him death threats he will be asked "Well, how do you know for sure that they were him?"
What will he say? "Because they were written from his real name!"
Then he will be asked "Well, do you know of any other names this man uses on the site? Has he used his real name prior to Feb 1st, the same date of the name registration and the same date you took out your arrest warrant?"
Will he say: "Yes. Mr. Misery but that was banned and then theres Jimmlegs but the messages were sent from his REAL NAME!"
What will likely be asked next "So you knew he used the name Jimmylegs but the name that was used to message you wasn't Jimmylegs, but his real name? Has he ever used his real name to post before?"
What will be his response to that?
Then the knowledge of eesh knowing full well how poster's have used names to impersonate others will come up. It will be brought up how he's very much aware of how Cary has to have a court order to truly ID a poster and that even knowing this he still didn't go that route and went straight to the authorties without waiting for a postive ID from Cary.
"So you aren't actually 100% sure who was sending you messages but you still decided to go report it and have someone arrested anyway saying that you KNEW it was him?"
Again, this is saying that if it wasn't actually eesh but him knowing all of this and still going and reporting it saying that he knew for a fact who was sending him messages, giving up his information and having the police arrested.
Unless, he did in fact know who was sending the messages and it was him and he knew he could fool a magistrate because most aren't too savvy on this internet thing and he knew he would get what he wanted for the time being.
Not realizing that an actual investigation would be done and Misery's IP can probably show he didn't send the messages and that once this happens it won't he Misery having to worry about any conviction or charges.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh The Felon
()
Date: April 15, 2015 09:09PM
How did these become felonies?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 16, 2015 06:49AM
eesh tried to have me arreated last night so that I can't testify against him today LMAO!
Had that girl's fiancé thing message me, knowing full well that there's a mutual no contact protective order again't all of us and he had her message me asking when court was lmfao!
Like really bitch?! Are you really asking me this at 12am when you could be asking your cheating ass fiance? Nope! Nice try. I screen shotted her message and called the police. I can now have them charged for contempt.
That carries a jail sentence and I'm pretty sure he just helped my case out so damn much with that!
Thanks eesh! :)
See you soon faggot! Don't run away with time! Like you did here: https://youtu.be/UNgsgQWZtVE
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:45PM by lizzie.
Had that girl's fiancé thing message me, knowing full well that there's a mutual no contact protective order again't all of us and he had her message me asking when court was lmfao!
Like really bitch?! Are you really asking me this at 12am when you could be asking your cheating ass fiance? Nope! Nice try. I screen shotted her message and called the police. I can now have them charged for contempt.
That carries a jail sentence and I'm pretty sure he just helped my case out so damn much with that!
Thanks eesh! :)
See you soon faggot! Don't run away with time! Like you did here: https://youtu.be/UNgsgQWZtVE
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:45PM by lizzie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 16, 2015 08:53AM
Here!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 16, 2015 11:26AM
CASE DISMISSED BITCHES!
Who's a credible witness?!
MONIQUE WELLS IS!
FUCK ALL YALL WHO SAID I'M A LIAR AND WOULD BE DISCREDITED!
Check the court website in a little to see and let's see if eesh posts the CASE DIMISSED screen shot over and over and over again!
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA AND OH THERE IS SO MUCH MORE COMING STAY TUNED FOLKS!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
Who's a credible witness?!
MONIQUE WELLS IS!
FUCK ALL YALL WHO SAID I'M A LIAR AND WOULD BE DISCREDITED!
Check the court website in a little to see and let's see if eesh posts the CASE DIMISSED screen shot over and over and over again!
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA AND OH THERE IS SO MUCH MORE COMING STAY TUNED FOLKS!
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
thanks lizzie!
()
Date: April 16, 2015 12:43PM
Glad to see you helping an innocent man out. Eesh dun goofed now that the charge was dropped.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 16, 2015 01:24PM
thanks lizzie! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Glad to see you helping an innocent man out. Eesh
> dun goofed now that the charge was dropped.
:)
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
-------------------------------------------------------
> Glad to see you helping an innocent man out. Eesh
> dun goofed now that the charge was dropped.
:)
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lizzie
()
Date: April 16, 2015 03:19PM
lol
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:41PM by lizzie.
I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2015 09:41PM by lizzie.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: April 16, 2015 03:44PM
You have done the right thing, Lizzie...
And yes, I did believe you were both hurting Eesh's case and putting yourself in legal jeopardy by appearing in court with him.
But so long as you were truthful, and so long as you did not testify to anything that will incriminate you in the case that you're a defendant in, you should be ok.
And yes, I did believe you were both hurting Eesh's case and putting yourself in legal jeopardy by appearing in court with him.
But so long as you were truthful, and so long as you did not testify to anything that will incriminate you in the case that you're a defendant in, you should be ok.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Days of Our Lives
()
Date: April 16, 2015 10:20PM
"Go watch a soap opera or something"
-Michael Basl on being creeped out by a stranger observing HIM
Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: CourthouseObserver ()
Date: March 13, 2015 12:54PM
I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule this morning, and so I decided to drop into Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as much as I could of today's proceedings in the case of Misery v. Eesh.
My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh is in a lot of trouble here.
First, the atmospherics...
The court was entertaining pretrial and interlocutory motions, rather than conducting trials and so, for the most part, those present in and addressing the court were attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their motions before the court.
Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat together in the back row until their case was called.
Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy was conservatively dressed in black in what appeared to be business attire and running shoes. While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time that the court was in session, she left the courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery v. Eesh case was called before the judge and missed most of the proceedings.
Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as well, sitting by himself dressed much more casually.
Misery's attorney was unconventional in his appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and a good amount of facial hair. But he was professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported himself well professionally during and after the proceedings.
The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX Underground users who are not attorneys) means he was without counsel.
The purpose of today's proceedings was for the court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case. As best as I can understand it (I did not speak to any of the parties after the proceedings to confirm this), the motion was predicated on the fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit within the time period required by law and still had not filed a response. As a general matter, when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party) will ask the court to enter a summary judgement against the defendant (the person who is being sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule that he, the defendant, had not been properly served or given notice of the suit and/or not given proper notice of the motions filed by the plaintiff).
Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in favor of his motion for summary judgement, asserting that the suit and notice had been properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He asked that, in the alternative, if the judge declined to make a summary judgement in favor of Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys fees and costs that had been incurred so far to research, prepared, file, and argue the motions and that said fees and costs be paid as a precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the case without summary judgement.
Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no defense to not having responded to the suit. Instead, contended that he had not been properly served and asked the judge to quash service.
The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that service had been properly made; that Eesh had not responded at all, let alone within the timeframes required by law; and that grounds were there for summary judgement. She indicated however, that she was reluctant to do so in this instance at this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the suit, as well as for his motion to quash service -- both on the merits of the motion and for his failure to properly file it.
Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the situation he is in and of what he needs to do in order to defend himself, saying several times that he has no legal training; that he is attending school on the GI Bill and has no money for attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case, which he did not have.
The judge was having none of it.
She told him that he was gambling by not having counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects of court procedure. He was unable to satisfactorily answer her.
In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
She denied both the motion for summary judgement and the motion to quash service. However, she gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit or properly file a motion to quash service, whichever he chose to do. On the request by Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied that request without prejudice, saying that the attorney could bring that up again at the appropriate time.
Eesh is in trouble.
My free legal advice to him is ...
First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one, SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This is a significant case that could have implications far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that there are attorneys and organizations out there who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You have little hope of prevailing if you are not represented, as well.
Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly post can help you. But you have no idea how things you might post might hurt you.
Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of her), you might not want to show up with her in court. If you want her to be a witness for you, she might not be permitted to testify on your behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony charges against her (although, from what I can tell, those charges might well be bogus).
More later...
/
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:17PM by Cary.
Attachments:
-Michael Basl on being creeped out by a stranger observing HIM
Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by: CourthouseObserver ()
Date: March 13, 2015 12:54PM
I had a couple of hour-long break in my schedule this morning, and so I decided to drop into Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom 4F to observe as much as I could of today's proceedings in the case of Misery v. Eesh.
My Bottom-Line take on the situation is that Eesh is in a lot of trouble here.
First, the atmospherics...
The court was entertaining pretrial and interlocutory motions, rather than conducting trials and so, for the most part, those present in and addressing the court were attorneys for plaintiffs and defendants who were arguing their motions before the court.
Eesh was there, accompanied by Lizzy, and they sat together in the back row until their case was called.
Eesh was smartly dressed, with well-pressed Khaki pants, a blue blazer, a dress shirt and tie. Lizzy was conservatively dressed in black in what appeared to be business attire and running shoes. While Lizzy sat beside him for much of the time that the court was in session, she left the courtroom occasionally (to make phone calls, I believe) and returned each time. Indeed, she actually was out of the courtroom when the Misery v. Eesh case was called before the judge and missed most of the proceedings.
Someone who I assumed was Misery was there, as well, sitting by himself dressed much more casually.
Misery's attorney was unconventional in his appearance, in that he had long, flowing hair and a good amount of facial hair. But he was professionally dressed in a dark suit, dress shirt, tie, and pocket square, and he comported himself well professionally during and after the proceedings.
The biggest surprise for me, though, was that Eesh was appearing pro Se, which (for the few FFX Underground users who are not attorneys) means he was without counsel.
The purpose of today's proceedings was for the court to hear arguments and rule on a motion by Eesh's attorney for summary judgement in the case. As best as I can understand it (I did not speak to any of the parties after the proceedings to confirm this), the motion was predicated on the fact that Eesh did not file a response to the suit within the time period required by law and still had not filed a response. As a general matter, when this occurs, a plantiff (the charging party) will ask the court to enter a summary judgement against the defendant (the person who is being sued) and in favor of the plaintiff.
Eesh's "defense" to the motion for summary judgement was to file a motion of his own, asking the judge to quash service (ask the judge to rule that he, the defendant, had not been properly served or given notice of the suit and/or not given proper notice of the motions filed by the plaintiff).
Misery's attorney presented a compelling case in favor of his motion for summary judgement, asserting that the suit and notice had been properly served by the Sheriff, offering the court proof of the same, and asserting that Eesh had not responded to the suit in the proper timeframe. He asked that, in the alternative, if the judge declined to make a summary judgement in favor of Misery, that she award Misery $1,900 in attorneys fees and costs that had been incurred so far to research, prepared, file, and argue the motions and that said fees and costs be paid as a precondition to allowing Eesh to continue in the case without summary judgement.
Appearing on his own behalf, Eesh offered no defense to not having responded to the suit. Instead, contended that he had not been properly served and asked the judge to quash service.
The judge agreed with Misery's attorney that service had been properly made; that Eesh had not responded at all, let alone within the timeframes required by law; and that grounds were there for summary judgement. She indicated however, that she was reluctant to do so in this instance at this time, in part because Eesh was appearing Pro Se. She castigated Eesh for not responding to the suit, as well as for his motion to quash service -- both on the merits of the motion and for his failure to properly file it.
Eesh appeared confused about the legalities of the situation he is in and of what he needs to do in order to defend himself, saying several times that he has no legal training; that he is attending school on the GI Bill and has no money for attorneys; and that he had consulted an attorney who wanted $10,000 from him to take the case, which he did not have.
The judge was having none of it.
She told him that he was gambling by not having counsel and that, at the very least, he needs to talk with one. She quizzed him on several aspects of court procedure. He was unable to satisfactorily answer her.
In the end, she cut him a MAJOR break.
She denied both the motion for summary judgement and the motion to quash service. However, she gave Eesh ten days to either respond to the suit or properly file a motion to quash service, whichever he chose to do. On the request by Misery's attorney for attorneys fees, she denied that request without prejudice, saying that the attorney could bring that up again at the appropriate time.
Eesh is in trouble.
My free legal advice to him is ...
First, get an attorney. If you cannot afford one, SURELY you can find a First Amendment attorney (ACLU, perhaps?) who would do it for free. This is a significant case that could have implications far beyond FFX Underground, and I am sure that there are attorneys and organizations out there who, notwithstanding his bad behavior, would take on this case. Misery's attorney is good. You have little hope of prevailing if you are not represented, as well.
Second, stop posting on Fairfax Underground until this suit is over. Nothing you could possibly post can help you. But you have no idea how things you might post might hurt you.
Third, as wonderful a person as Lizzy might be (I offer neither an endorsement nor a commendation of her), you might not want to show up with her in court. If you want her to be a witness for you, she might not be permitted to testify on your behalf if she has been prejudiced by viewing prior proceedings. And she DOES have pending felony charges against her (although, from what I can tell, those charges might well be bogus).
More later...
/
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:17PM by Cary.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Right there on page 2...
()
Date: April 17, 2015 01:42AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think a certain troll needs to look up the
> difference between criminal and civil
> trials....and when they get their ADHD under
> control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic.
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
>
>
> Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned
> poster that is currently facing computer
> harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we
> won't talk about that out of decency.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?40,file=172756,filename=Scan0003.jpg
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think a certain troll needs to look up the
> difference between criminal and civil
> trials....and when they get their ADHD under
> control, read the pleadings posted in off-topic.
> Nowhere in the suit does it say anything about
> cyberbullying or internet stalking.
>
>
> Matter of fact, there is a permanently banned
> poster that is currently facing computer
> harassment charges down in Henrico County, but we
> won't talk about that out of decency.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.php?40,file=172756,filename=Scan0003.jpg
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
proven liar
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:13AM
no one will ever believe a word eesh says again
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
proven liar
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:16AM
he is a compulsive habitual pathological liar
zero creitabitly irl in court or on here now
zero creitabitly irl in court or on here now
@eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:38AM
I will be seeking a protective order against you now.
What is your excuse for coming to my home?
Now I am sure it is you I saw.
Attachments:
What is your excuse for coming to my home?
Now I am sure it is you I saw.
Attachments:
Re: @eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:40AM
For the record.
I am not even mad at her but what is your excuse. M
First you post my nudes then you come to my home.
I don't know you.
You're the delusional one living in a made up world.
I am not even mad at her but what is your excuse. M
First you post my nudes then you come to my home.
I don't know you.
You're the delusional one living in a made up world.
Re: @eesh
Posted by:
question for megan
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:40AM
did anything happen to your property or cars?
get a camera
and a gun
get a camera
and a gun
Re: @eesh
Posted by:
question for megan
()
Date: April 17, 2015 02:41AM
a driveway buzzer
a dog
and a gun
a dog
and a gun
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:10AM
I guess this is eesh's definition of normal.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
somewhat ironic
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:18AM
It is kind of ironic that way back in January eesh was so paranoid these exact three people were "teaming up" to sue him, and now, precisely because he was that paranoid to believe that and ended up having miz fasley arrested, these exact three people are in reality all suing him if not altogether then at least separately. Talk about a self-fulfiling prophecy.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A self fulfilling prophecy
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:31AM
The biggest self fulfilling prophecy was this thread eesh made right here:
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1825145/1825145.html#msg-1825145
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1825145/1825145.html#msg-1825145
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nada
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:41AM
wouldn't call that anything but eesh's guilty conscience
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Why?
()
Date: April 17, 2015 04:03AM
A self fulfilling prophecy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The biggest self fulfilling prophecy was this
> thread eesh made right here:
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1
> 825145/1825145.html#msg-1825145
+1
Op was definitely Eesh. Lizzie said she hadn't told anybody what Eesh told her, so who else would have known Eesh told her anything?
Eesh has a very warped sense of thinking and made that thread to see how Lizzie would react and it looks like she was even saying back then she had nothing to tell but she ended up being implicated anyway by Megan and that thread Eesh posted probably didn't help him any.
I think if Lizzie wanted to get Eesh she would have set him up from the get go and would have been posting all about being a witness in the case, but we heard it first from Eesh.
Eesh needs to realize he can't be mad at anyone but himself. He can't be mad at Megan for implications, he tortured her and she used what avenues she could. He can't be mad at Lizzie for what he told her and her being made to tell and speaking in court under oath and he can't be mad at Misery because he and like everyone else here - never did anything to Eesh to get the treatment they have gotten.
So why Eesh? Why did you do all of these things to all of these people who never did anything to you?
Why?
-------------------------------------------------------
> The biggest self fulfilling prophecy was this
> thread eesh made right here:
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1
> 825145/1825145.html#msg-1825145
+1
Op was definitely Eesh. Lizzie said she hadn't told anybody what Eesh told her, so who else would have known Eesh told her anything?
Eesh has a very warped sense of thinking and made that thread to see how Lizzie would react and it looks like she was even saying back then she had nothing to tell but she ended up being implicated anyway by Megan and that thread Eesh posted probably didn't help him any.
I think if Lizzie wanted to get Eesh she would have set him up from the get go and would have been posting all about being a witness in the case, but we heard it first from Eesh.
Eesh needs to realize he can't be mad at anyone but himself. He can't be mad at Megan for implications, he tortured her and she used what avenues she could. He can't be mad at Lizzie for what he told her and her being made to tell and speaking in court under oath and he can't be mad at Misery because he and like everyone else here - never did anything to Eesh to get the treatment they have gotten.
So why Eesh? Why did you do all of these things to all of these people who never did anything to you?
Why?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Telling Texts
()
Date: April 17, 2015 04:41AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Telling Texts
()
Date: April 17, 2015 04:43AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
3 time champion
()
Date: April 17, 2015 05:15AM
^^^^^^^^^^
yeah...only one was suing you THEN...
but because you're a paranoid sociopath and evil incarnate, they actually ALL ARE now!
how's it feel to have THREE separate lawsuits and god knows how many protective orders and who knows how many criminal complaints pending against you.......ALL AT THE SAME TIME?
and who do you have to blame?
no one but yourself.
yeah...only one was suing you THEN...
but because you're a paranoid sociopath and evil incarnate, they actually ALL ARE now!
how's it feel to have THREE separate lawsuits and god knows how many protective orders and who knows how many criminal complaints pending against you.......ALL AT THE SAME TIME?
and who do you have to blame?
no one but yourself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
more like 3 time loser...
()
Date: April 17, 2015 05:16AM
3 time champion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> yeah...only one was suing you THEN...
>
>
> but because you're a paranoid sociopath and evil
> incarnate, they actually ALL ARE now!
>
>
> how's it feel to have THREE separate lawsuits and
> god knows how many protective orders and who knows
> how many criminal complaints pending against
> you.......ALL AT THE SAME TIME?
>
>
> and who do you have to blame?
>
> no one but yourself.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> yeah...only one was suing you THEN...
>
>
> but because you're a paranoid sociopath and evil
> incarnate, they actually ALL ARE now!
>
>
> how's it feel to have THREE separate lawsuits and
> god knows how many protective orders and who knows
> how many criminal complaints pending against
> you.......ALL AT THE SAME TIME?
>
>
> and who do you have to blame?
>
> no one but yourself.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megan is smarter than Eesh
()
Date: April 17, 2015 05:29AM
You know what's really funny or more ironic? Megan probably didn't tell Eesh anything about Lizzie at that time but she did warn him several times that he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is smarter than Eesh.
Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of money if she wants to do anything to him now.
Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of money if she wants to do anything to him now.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 17, 2015 06:04AM
Megan is smarter than Eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know what's really funny or more ironic? Megan
> probably didn't tell Eesh anything about Lizzie at
> that time but she did warn him several times that
> he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is smarter
> than Eesh.
>
> Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> money if she wants to do anything to him now.
And people I don't know/have never talked to providing me information make it that much easier too. He's what I've recently found out about Basl. Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared that she was with him when he first came by/stalked my home.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know what's really funny or more ironic? Megan
> probably didn't tell Eesh anything about Lizzie at
> that time but she did warn him several times that
> he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is smarter
> than Eesh.
>
> Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> money if she wants to do anything to him now.
And people I don't know/have never talked to providing me information make it that much easier too. He's what I've recently found out about Basl. Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared that she was with him when he first came by/stalked my home.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
You Criminal
()
Date: April 17, 2015 06:09AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
strath rd. stalker
()
Date: April 17, 2015 06:12AM
Megynlynn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megan is smarter than Eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You know what's really funny or more ironic?
> Megan
> > probably didn't tell Eesh anything about Lizzie
> at
> > that time but she did warn him several times
> that
> > he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is
> smarter
> > than Eesh.
> >
> > Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> > money if she wants to do anything to him now.
>
>
> And people I don't know/have never talked to
> providing me information make it that much easier
> too. He's what I've recently found out about Basl.
> Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared that
> she was with him when he first came by/stalked my
> home.
He's been said to pull this clandestine facebook thing with at least a few other posters over the years. Don't doubt this for a second. Megan, you should get a protective order. This guy has been ratcheting up his cyberstalking into real life stalking apparently now for quite some time on you. Be safe.
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:13PM by Cary.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megan is smarter than Eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You know what's really funny or more ironic?
> Megan
> > probably didn't tell Eesh anything about Lizzie
> at
> > that time but she did warn him several times
> that
> > he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is
> smarter
> > than Eesh.
> >
> > Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> > money if she wants to do anything to him now.
>
>
> And people I don't know/have never talked to
> providing me information make it that much easier
> too. He's what I've recently found out about Basl.
> Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared that
> she was with him when he first came by/stalked my
> home.
He's been said to pull this clandestine facebook thing with at least a few other posters over the years. Don't doubt this for a second. Megan, you should get a protective order. This guy has been ratcheting up his cyberstalking into real life stalking apparently now for quite some time on you. Be safe.
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:13PM by Cary.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Oblivieesh
()
Date: April 17, 2015 06:21AM
When do you think Michael will get the clue that nobody on earth would care if he dropped dead today, that no one wants him around, nobody likes him, no one loves him, not a soul on this planet cares for him in the slightest bit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Long rap sheet
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:14PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Oooh an edit
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:31PM
strath rd. stalker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megynlynn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Megan is smarter than Eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You know what's really funny or more ironic?
> > Megan
> > > probably didn't tell Eesh anything about
> Lizzie
> > at
> > > that time but she did warn him several times
> > that
> > > he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is
> > smarter
> > > than Eesh.
> > >
> > > Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> > > money if she wants to do anything to him now.
> >
> >
> > And people I don't know/have never talked to
> > providing me information make it that much
> easier
> > too. He's what I've recently found out about
> Basl.
> > Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared
> that
> > she was with him when he first came by/stalked
> my
> > home.
>
>
> He's been said to pull this clandestine facebook
> thing with at least a few other posters over the
> years. Don't doubt this for a second. Megan, you
> should get a protective order. This guy has been
> ratcheting up his cyberstalking into real life
> stalking apparently now for quite some time on
> you. Be safe.
>
>
> edit by Cary: This post was generated by the
> author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs.
> Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously
> if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You
> have been permanently banned from this forum. Any
> attempt by you to access this interactive
> computing resource is against repeated explicit
> instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Hahahahahahahaha stupid ass misery
-------------------------------------------------------
> Megynlynn Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Megan is smarter than Eesh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You know what's really funny or more ironic?
> > Megan
> > > probably didn't tell Eesh anything about
> Lizzie
> > at
> > > that time but she did warn him several times
> > that
> > > he was an idiot for trusting her. Megan is
> > smarter
> > > than Eesh.
> > >
> > > Megan doesn't even needs to dish out a lot of
> > > money if she wants to do anything to him now.
> >
> >
> > And people I don't know/have never talked to
> > providing me information make it that much
> easier
> > too. He's what I've recently found out about
> Basl.
> > Other than the invaluable info Lizzie shared
> that
> > she was with him when he first came by/stalked
> my
> > home.
>
>
> He's been said to pull this clandestine facebook
> thing with at least a few other posters over the
> years. Don't doubt this for a second. Megan, you
> should get a protective order. This guy has been
> ratcheting up his cyberstalking into real life
> stalking apparently now for quite some time on
> you. Be safe.
>
>
> edit by Cary: This post was generated by the
> author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs.
> Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously
> if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You
> have been permanently banned from this forum. Any
> attempt by you to access this interactive
> computing resource is against repeated explicit
> instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Hahahahahahahaha stupid ass misery
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Smart actually
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:34PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
wasn't what?
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:38PM
wasn't what? using the forum? it sure seems like he was to me.
wasn't stupid? the baby rape posts were very stupid.
i can only go by what you give me.
wasn't stupid? the baby rape posts were very stupid.
i can only go by what you give me.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Smart actually
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:41PM
I know you're slooooow..but maybe if you clicked the link you wouldn't be asking so many stupid questions and understand why Cary calling him out by his registered screen names worked in his favor.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
proof
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:49PM
i clicked. just because cary named 2 screen names doesn't prove he didn't use other names as well. thats the name he usually posts from now, it's logical it was mentioned. thinking it's proof because he didn't list every name he ever used is a big jump.
he didn't mention all your sn's when he exposed those posts of yours before. why would he do it now when there may be things at stake?
he didn't mention all your sn's when he exposed those posts of yours before. why would he do it now when there may be things at stake?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
;kjhfvbjdkaf
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:50PM
the guy got fucked over, that's for sure. but these crazy posts are not winning anybody over, lizzy. wait for real proof you gibbering fool.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Not gonna entertain a retard
()
Date: April 17, 2015 12:51PM
It sure does!
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Smart Actually
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:58PM
"Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs"
So..he wasn't http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/profile.php?40,11987 that poster afterall!
edit by Cary: The malicious user that was linked to above has only ever logged in with (proxy) IP 198.204.237.10. The account is still active only because I've been hoping the perputrator will accidentally log in again with an IP I can correlate to a real identity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:59PM by Cary.
So..he wasn't http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/profile.php?40,11987 that poster afterall!
edit by Cary: The malicious user that was linked to above has only ever logged in with (proxy) IP 198.204.237.10. The account is still active only because I've been hoping the perputrator will accidentally log in again with an IP I can correlate to a real identity.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/2015 12:59PM by Cary.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Smart Actually
()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:59PM
Now, why would Misery use his real name but hide behind a proxy? But not hide behind one where he posts anon from the name IP that connects him to his registered names?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KPpEF
()
Date: April 19, 2015 08:45PM
Defeats the purpose of using your real name if you're going to use a proxy to cover your tracks.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Who came out on top?
()
Date: April 20, 2015 05:44PM
DanoWells Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at
> anticipating consequences. They are also the ones
> that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on top.
Eesh certainly didn't come out on top. Did he?
Do people feel dumb when they make statements like this and get proven wrong?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Both Misery and Lizzie strike me as very poor at
> anticipating consequences. They are also the ones
> that get arrested. I think eesh will come out on top.
Eesh certainly didn't come out on top. Did he?
Do people feel dumb when they make statements like this and get proven wrong?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lizzie Post
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:09PM
Re: Video-Voice Message To MICHAEL BASL
Posted by: Brain damaged = you ()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:10AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There was probable cause, but in the end, the
> Judge noted the Commonwealth couldn't prove beyond
> a reasonable doubt. The probable cause was there,
> but criminal cases require 99% certainty for conviction.
Nah bitch. There was no probable cause. You got lucky when you got a magistrate who has no idea how this site works.
The judge noted that you knew this site well enough to know Mr. Misery most likely would not have used his real name to send you illegal things.
Knowing all of this (the 99% certainty) you still went up in court thinking you'd actually get a conviction if you lied your ass off some more and your lies were made very obvious to everyone in the court room when you couldn't give a straight "yes" or "no" answer to the questions during your cross examination and started panicking.
Posted by: Brain damaged = you ()
Date: April 17, 2015 03:10AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There was probable cause, but in the end, the
> Judge noted the Commonwealth couldn't prove beyond
> a reasonable doubt. The probable cause was there,
> but criminal cases require 99% certainty for conviction.
Nah bitch. There was no probable cause. You got lucky when you got a magistrate who has no idea how this site works.
The judge noted that you knew this site well enough to know Mr. Misery most likely would not have used his real name to send you illegal things.
Knowing all of this (the 99% certainty) you still went up in court thinking you'd actually get a conviction if you lied your ass off some more and your lies were made very obvious to everyone in the court room when you couldn't give a straight "yes" or "no" answer to the questions during your cross examination and started panicking.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Misery Post
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:09PM
Re: eesh is a good sport
Posted by: Post ()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:06PM
Re: Can Someone Please Recount What Happened in Eesh Case??
Posted by: Post 1 ()
Date: April 17, 2015 08:25PM
You know...something to consider, maybe: you know you lied. God knows you lied. We all know you lied. By pulling this stunt, however, you have made a 40 year judgment against yourself in the Miseries' lawsuit a virtual foregone conclusion. We also know, of course, hard proof that you lied to a judge will never be found. But a jail sentence for perjury may only be like 3 years prison, or less. You'd be out in no time. Compare that to something that will follow you around for the rest of your life, you can never own anything again, any money you make you pay a large chunk to the Miseries, bank accounts drained, any assets seized, it will haunt you, forever. It might not be the worst thing in the world to confess to the fact you lied and perjured yourself. Weigh your options.
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Posted by: Post ()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:06PM
Re: Can Someone Please Recount What Happened in Eesh Case??
Posted by: Post 1 ()
Date: April 17, 2015 08:25PM
You know...something to consider, maybe: you know you lied. God knows you lied. We all know you lied. By pulling this stunt, however, you have made a 40 year judgment against yourself in the Miseries' lawsuit a virtual foregone conclusion. We also know, of course, hard proof that you lied to a judge will never be found. But a jail sentence for perjury may only be like 3 years prison, or less. You'd be out in no time. Compare that to something that will follow you around for the rest of your life, you can never own anything again, any money you make you pay a large chunk to the Miseries, bank accounts drained, any assets seized, it will haunt you, forever. It might not be the worst thing in the world to confess to the fact you lied and perjured yourself. Weigh your options.
edit by Cary: This post was generated by the author formerly known as Mr. Misery aka jimmylegs. Mr. Misery, I would take these comments seriously if they were produced by ANYONE but yourself. You have been permanently banned from this forum. Any attempt by you to access this interactive computing resource is against repeated explicit instructions that you are not authorized to do so.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Admitting crimes to Lizzie
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:10PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I never said this
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:13PM
Is he just forgetful or a liar? You be the judge. Obviously he would have known he had to do 50 hours. Why would that be such a terrible thing to admit the the forum? He did commit a crime sfterall.Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
He's calling Vine on you!
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:19PM
Michael Basl is probably going to contact Vine and victim services over the relentless trolling and butthurt he's been receiving.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fraud
()
Date: April 20, 2015 06:27PM
vine has an open investigation on him for fraud because of this case
doubt he will be contacting them again
doubt he will be contacting them again
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Maximum Punishment
()
Date: April 20, 2015 08:01PM
Lizzie wrote:
> And eesh, I'll say this - you told me you didn't
> make the call to have the swatting actually
> happen.
>
> Now what? I could have easily lied here and say
> you did.
>
> So FUCK YOU! I never lied on you bitch!
Well, this is very telling. If Lizzie was really lying on Eesh there's no reason why she wouldn't go the extra mile here to get him in the maximum amount of trouble.
> And eesh, I'll say this - you told me you didn't
> make the call to have the swatting actually
> happen.
>
> Now what? I could have easily lied here and say
> you did.
>
> So FUCK YOU! I never lied on you bitch!
Well, this is very telling. If Lizzie was really lying on Eesh there's no reason why she wouldn't go the extra mile here to get him in the maximum amount of trouble.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
yvu4d
()
Date: April 20, 2015 08:47PM
Re: Michael Basl aka eesh caught in more lies
Posted by: lizzie ()
Date: April 19, 2015 02:39AM
Hmm. No. I'm not testifying about how he vandalized or stalked anyone or anything. He never admitted any of that to me.
And I guess I will set the record straight again and say that technically eesh didn't have them swatted if he says he didn't make the actual phone call to police which I actually believe. He only made the posts.
liz is saving your bitch ass here basl
but we all know you would and are willing to lie on her in a heart beat
just like you did miz
you call her scum
the only scum is you
she could have lied and said you admitted to doing all that shit
liz isn't the reason for you being in trouble
you are and only you and your actions
Posted by: lizzie ()
Date: April 19, 2015 02:39AM
Hmm. No. I'm not testifying about how he vandalized or stalked anyone or anything. He never admitted any of that to me.
And I guess I will set the record straight again and say that technically eesh didn't have them swatted if he says he didn't make the actual phone call to police which I actually believe. He only made the posts.
liz is saving your bitch ass here basl
but we all know you would and are willing to lie on her in a heart beat
just like you did miz
you call her scum
the only scum is you
she could have lied and said you admitted to doing all that shit
liz isn't the reason for you being in trouble
you are and only you and your actions
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Fucked up shit MICHAEL BASL does
()
Date: April 20, 2015 08:48PM
And to think, all the fucked up shit Eesh, MICHAEL BASL has done to Lizzie:
Outing her
Stalking her
Posting her pictures
Posting her number
Posting her family's pictures
Posting her friend's pictures
Posting her family's numbers
Posting her address
Posting her record
Lying on her
Defaming her
Impersonating her family
Posting where she works
Harassing and calling her mother
Vandalizing her family's vehicles more than once
Contacting Papa John's
Trying to have her arrested
And she still doesn't lie on him.
Outing her
Stalking her
Posting her pictures
Posting her number
Posting her family's pictures
Posting her friend's pictures
Posting her family's numbers
Posting her address
Posting her record
Lying on her
Defaming her
Impersonating her family
Posting where she works
Harassing and calling her mother
Vandalizing her family's vehicles more than once
Contacting Papa John's
Trying to have her arrested
And she still doesn't lie on him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
n6ced
()
Date: April 20, 2015 08:58PM
Prediction Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> hands from this mess too. I predict it or she in
> the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin without
> rralizing what she already did.
>
> Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd
> damned his case.
Megan?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> hands from this mess too. I predict it or she in
> the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin without
> rralizing what she already did.
>
> Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how she'd
> damned his case.
Megan?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Same thing with Miz
()
Date: April 20, 2015 08:59PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the clarification, Lizzie...
>
> I agree with you that the bomb threat case against
> you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me
> off royally that you are in the situation you are
> in. How frightened we all should be that someone
> could be hauled to jail and forced to defend
> oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy "evidence..."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the clarification, Lizzie...
>
> I agree with you that the bomb threat case against
> you seems incredibly unjust. Indeed, it pisses me
> off royally that you are in the situation you are
> in. How frightened we all should be that someone
> could be hauled to jail and forced to defend
> oneself in court on what appears to be such flimsy "evidence..."
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
My ass hurts
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:00PM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't want to disparage anyone.
>
> I know some people here love Lizzie; some don't.
>
>
> The charges Lizzie has faced (other than the
> seemingly bogus bomb threat charge) seem minor.
> They are so minor that they certainly would not
> cause me to make negative judgements about her
> character. Indeed, she seems like quite an
> intelligent young woman. People can grow and
> change. So let's not demonize her.
>
> Where I DO agree with @2 cases, though, is that
> anyone who is facing legal or civil charges
> (whether that be Lizzie, Eesh, or anyone else),
> would be MOST wise to shutdown their social media
> activities until their cases are disposed of.
>
> I say that, notwithstanding the fact that the
> posts that she and all of the others involved in
> the Papa Johns and Swatting sagas have provided me
> with countless hours of entertainment.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't want to disparage anyone.
>
> I know some people here love Lizzie; some don't.
>
>
> The charges Lizzie has faced (other than the
> seemingly bogus bomb threat charge) seem minor.
> They are so minor that they certainly would not
> cause me to make negative judgements about her
> character. Indeed, she seems like quite an
> intelligent young woman. People can grow and
> change. So let's not demonize her.
>
> Where I DO agree with @2 cases, though, is that
> anyone who is facing legal or civil charges
> (whether that be Lizzie, Eesh, or anyone else),
> would be MOST wise to shutdown their social media
> activities until their cases are disposed of.
>
> I say that, notwithstanding the fact that the
> posts that she and all of the others involved in
> the Papa Johns and Swatting sagas have provided me
> with countless hours of entertainment.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Fageesh
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:01PM
tables turned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lol the internet troll gets trolled while being
> sued. Oh the irony is too thick to comprehend.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lol the internet troll gets trolled while being
> sued. Oh the irony is too thick to comprehend.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Megynlynn
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:02PM
n6ced Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Prediction Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> > hands from this mess too. I predict it or she
> in
> > the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin
> without
> > rralizing what she already did.
> >
> > Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how
> she'd
> > damned his case.
>
>
> Megan?
Nope. Wasn't me, I don't think anyone has a case against Lizzie. However, she did eliminate the ability to Basl to implicate her which was good on her part.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Prediction Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Monique is going to end up with a suit on her
> > hands from this mess too. I predict it or she
> in
> > the end will be the nail in eesh's coffin
> without
> > rralizing what she already did.
> >
> > Fitting she'd be there not even knowing how
> she'd
> > damned his case.
>
>
> Megan?
Nope. Wasn't me, I don't think anyone has a case against Lizzie. However, she did eliminate the ability to Basl to implicate her which was good on her part.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Fucked up shit MICHAEL BASL does
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:02PM
And to think, all the fucked up shit Eesh, MICHAEL BASL has done to Lizzie:
Outing her
Stalking her
Posting her pictures
Posting her number
Posting her family's pictures
Posting her friend's pictures
Posting her family's numbers
Posting her address
Posting her record
Lying on her
Defaming her
Impersonating her family
Posting where she works
Harassing and calling her mother
Vandalizing her family's vehicles more than once
Contacting Papa John's
Trying to have her arrested
And she still didn't lie on him!
Outing her
Stalking her
Posting her pictures
Posting her number
Posting her family's pictures
Posting her friend's pictures
Posting her family's numbers
Posting her address
Posting her record
Lying on her
Defaming her
Impersonating her family
Posting where she works
Harassing and calling her mother
Vandalizing her family's vehicles more than once
Contacting Papa John's
Trying to have her arrested
And she still didn't lie on him!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Knocking on Hell's Door He Is
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:26PM
I can’t use it anymore
It’s gettin’ dark, too dark for me to see
Everyone's trollin me
I feel like I’m knockin’ on prison's door
Big black Tyrone is gonna make me his bitch and whore
Then Bubba is going to slip his dick in my back door
Knock knock knockin’on prison's door
Knock knock knockin’on prison's door
Daddy, put my guns in the ground
I can’t shoot them anymore
I had to call Vine because I'm an attention whore
That long black cloud is comin’ down
I feel like I’m knockin’ on hell's door
Please sing along to: The instrumental
http://youtu.be/2iGTbBT6nos
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MICHAEL BASL GETS OWNED!!!!!!!!!
()
Date: April 20, 2015 09:44PM
Best Eesh insult ever!
"You've said plenty, enough. You've been sitting back because you know no matter what you post everyone is going to jump in and attack you and make fun of you for being poor, being an actual mentally ill nustcase, jobless, ugly, fat, poor, mom being wormfood, living with your daddy, going to jr college, poor, getting caught in so many lies, being a petty thief, being poor, a struggling faggot who can't come to terms with his sexuality and doesn't know if he wants to be a woman or not. Go with woman because you certainly are no man."
I'm pretty sure he cried after reading this.
"You've said plenty, enough. You've been sitting back because you know no matter what you post everyone is going to jump in and attack you and make fun of you for being poor, being an actual mentally ill nustcase, jobless, ugly, fat, poor, mom being wormfood, living with your daddy, going to jr college, poor, getting caught in so many lies, being a petty thief, being poor, a struggling faggot who can't come to terms with his sexuality and doesn't know if he wants to be a woman or not. Go with woman because you certainly are no man."
I'm pretty sure he cried after reading this.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Depressed in Henrico
()
Date: April 20, 2015 10:26PM
Being Michael Josef Basl is not a laughing matter. In fact, it's rather depressing if you actually stop and think about what it must really like to be him. To do all the things he has done to people for no reason other than the fact that they posted on a website that he posts on. How much do you have to hate yourself and hate your life and hate the world to he such a bitter and nasty person.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
FAT IN A HAT
()
Date: April 20, 2015 10:32PM
You would hate the world, yourself and take your self loathing out on everyone else for looking better than you too if you looked like this thing...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
lmao basl
()
Date: April 21, 2015 01:19AM
fat in a hat lol
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cheh
()
Date: April 21, 2015 09:54AM
Depressed in Henrico Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Being Michael Josef Basl is not a laughing matter.
> In fact, it's rather depressing if you actually
> stop and think about what it must really like to
> be him. To do all the things he has done to people
> for no reason other than the fact that they posted
> on a website that he posts on. How much do you
> have to hate yourself and hate your life and hate
> the world to he such a bitter and nasty person.
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> Being Michael Josef Basl is not a laughing matter.
> In fact, it's rather depressing if you actually
> stop and think about what it must really like to
> be him. To do all the things he has done to people
> for no reason other than the fact that they posted
> on a website that he posts on. How much do you
> have to hate yourself and hate your life and hate
> the world to he such a bitter and nasty person.
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
roommates?
()
Date: April 21, 2015 02:25PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1842849/1845100.html#msg-1845100
basl/eesh claims lizzie lived with him in richmond lmao
why can't he stop lying?
basl/eesh claims lizzie lived with him in richmond lmao
why can't he stop lying?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
docket call
()
Date: April 21, 2015 02:30PM
Are Radiophile and Gibby considering joining in this lawsuit?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
()
Date: April 21, 2015 02:38PM
roommates? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 42849/1845100.html#msg-1845100
>
>
> basl/eesh claims lizzie lived with him in richmond
> lmao
>
> why can't he stop lying?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH OMG!!!!
MICHAEL BASL CANT STOP LYING!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 42849/1845100.html#msg-1845100
>
>
> basl/eesh claims lizzie lived with him in richmond
> lmao
>
> why can't he stop lying?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH OMG!!!!
MICHAEL BASL CANT STOP LYING!!!!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Michael Basl still stalking
()
Date: April 22, 2015 01:33AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Jared
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:01PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
He went to Jared
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:10PM
Re: More on Jared Loughner
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 12, 2011 09:09AM
Charles Krauthammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He was very disconnected from reality, said
> classmate Lydian Ali.
> You know how it is when you talk to someone
> who's mentally ill and theu' re just not
> there? said neighbor Jason Johnson. “It was
> like he was in his own world.
> These are the signs of a clinical thought disorder ideas
> disconnected from one another, incoherent,
> delusional, detached from reality.
> These are all the hallmarks of a paranoid
> schizophrenic. And a dangerous one.
Sounds like the Community College had plenty of chances to intervene when he was a student there. This guy was more obvious of an angry lunatic than Cho at Virginia Tech.
Where the fuck were his parents in all this? He started showing this erratic paranoid behavior in high school, totally reckless of them not to do anything or get help for him.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 12, 2011 09:09AM
Charles Krauthammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He was very disconnected from reality, said
> classmate Lydian Ali.
> You know how it is when you talk to someone
> who's mentally ill and theu' re just not
> there? said neighbor Jason Johnson. “It was
> like he was in his own world.
> These are the signs of a clinical thought disorder ideas
> disconnected from one another, incoherent,
> delusional, detached from reality.
> These are all the hallmarks of a paranoid
> schizophrenic. And a dangerous one.
Sounds like the Community College had plenty of chances to intervene when he was a student there. This guy was more obvious of an angry lunatic than Cho at Virginia Tech.
Where the fuck were his parents in all this? He started showing this erratic paranoid behavior in high school, totally reckless of them not to do anything or get help for him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
PEvcv
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:22PM
Re: Obama's 60min interview
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: September 13, 2009 11:27PM
I would delete that reference to where your mother is. There are a lot of stalker types that lurk on this forum that save every tid bit of info people reveal.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: September 13, 2009 11:27PM
I would delete that reference to where your mother is. There are a lot of stalker types that lurk on this forum that save every tid bit of info people reveal.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
VEEN4
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:23PM
Re: Sangha CPA vs. Eesh of FFXU
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 03, 2013 10:23PM
So in the past week, I have been labeled a libeler, extortioner, stalker, potential rapist and murderer.....
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 03, 2013 10:23PM
So in the past week, I have been labeled a libeler, extortioner, stalker, potential rapist and murderer.....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tNhmc
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:26PM
Re: Dealing with destructive alter ego
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: September 08, 2010 02:02AM
Drink your alter ego away with alcohol. Getting blind drunk keeps the voices out of my head.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: September 08, 2010 02:02AM
Drink your alter ego away with alcohol. Getting blind drunk keeps the voices out of my head.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
7jC3N
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:28PM
Re: Harry Tuttle
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 17, 2010 02:15AM
Saw psychiatrist
Schizoaffective I have
What to do with me
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 17, 2010 02:15AM
Saw psychiatrist
Schizoaffective I have
What to do with me
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
NTpj4
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:28PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
NcG3y
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:31PM
Re: Energy products make me tired
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 20, 2014 11:38PM
Geodon + Redbull = awake for 48 hours
---
What is Geodon?
Geodon (ziprasidone) is an antipsychotic medication. It works by changing the effects of chemicals in the brain.
Geodon is used to treat schizophrenia and the manic symptoms of bipolar disorder (manic depression) in adults and children who are at least 10 years old.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 20, 2014 11:38PM
Geodon + Redbull = awake for 48 hours
---
What is Geodon?
Geodon (ziprasidone) is an antipsychotic medication. It works by changing the effects of chemicals in the brain.
Geodon is used to treat schizophrenia and the manic symptoms of bipolar disorder (manic depression) in adults and children who are at least 10 years old.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Re: Does anyone here sleep? Post
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:31PM
Re: Danica Patrick wants YOU to buy a Can Am Bike
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 04, 2014 09:58AM
Otis the Drunk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn eesh, have you been up all night posting?
> 3:40am? Seek treatment
With Geodon and Effexor, you don't sleep for days. It feels like I'm on cocaine.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 04, 2014 09:58AM
Otis the Drunk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn eesh, have you been up all night posting?
> 3:40am? Seek treatment
With Geodon and Effexor, you don't sleep for days. It feels like I'm on cocaine.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
JTFmt
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:32PM
Re: YOU Are on Anti-Depressants... Which Ones? WHY?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 12, 2014 11:07AM
Yes, I'm on Effexor and Geodon, and it leaves me wired 24/7. Why am I on them? That's for you to find out.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: June 12, 2014 11:07AM
Yes, I'm on Effexor and Geodon, and it leaves me wired 24/7. Why am I on them? That's for you to find out.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MICHAEL J. BASL is a schizophrenic
()
Date: April 22, 2015 10:34PM
Re: Is your life going well? Or not well?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 22, 2010 03:06AM
That's really stupid. I didn't know schizophrenia was a state of being "different." It's a real disability.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 22, 2010 03:06AM
That's really stupid. I didn't know schizophrenia was a state of being "different." It's a real disability.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
bD4bX
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:34PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
YmKT9
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:35PM
Re: Am I a slut/hoe if...
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 24, 2011 03:38PM
Yagirll talks like someone that has been sexually abused.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 24, 2011 03:38PM
Yagirll talks like someone that has been sexually abused.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
3G6Tm
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:36PM
Re: hot or not: big fake titties
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 09, 2010 07:47PM
bloody blisters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> i know, thats why i save a PSD file. that is not
> the last you will see of her. ;) (im totally
> hitting on you right now)
Thanks, pedo-porn buddy.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 09, 2010 07:47PM
bloody blisters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> i know, thats why i save a PSD file. that is not
> the last you will see of her. ;) (im totally
> hitting on you right now)
Thanks, pedo-porn buddy.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
TDY44
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:36PM
Anyone Else Left Handed Here?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 01, 2014 12:37PM
Left handed and ambidextrous people are three times more likely to be pedophiles than right handed people.
Re: left handed people
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 26, 2014 01:04AM
I'm left handed, I do a lot of things with my right hand.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 01, 2014 12:37PM
Left handed and ambidextrous people are three times more likely to be pedophiles than right handed people.
Re: left handed people
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 26, 2014 01:04AM
I'm left handed, I do a lot of things with my right hand.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EPduT
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:37PM
Re: Kindle Owners are a Bunch of Sickos
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 12, 2010 12:55AM
ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> What I would like to know, is who the hell even
> decided to publish that garbage in the first
> place?
Someone that probably isn't a convicted pedophile, but has urges and has spent a lot of time researching the subject.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 12, 2010 12:55AM
ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> What I would like to know, is who the hell even
> decided to publish that garbage in the first
> place?
Someone that probably isn't a convicted pedophile, but has urges and has spent a lot of time researching the subject.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dxC7c
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:37PM
Re: Demonic Looking Teenager Arrested for Molesting Infant
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 08, 2014 09:30PM
Sexual abusers often were sexually abused themselves, and since this is someone so young doing the molesting, his childhood should be thoroughly examined.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 08, 2014 09:30PM
Sexual abusers often were sexually abused themselves, and since this is someone so young doing the molesting, his childhood should be thoroughly examined.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Re: Concerning Miley Cyrus/Hanna
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:41PM
Re: Concerning Miley Cyrus/Hannah Montana
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: August 31, 2009 09:25PM
You're the closest person this site has to a sex offender Bloody Blisters; especially after sending me those PMs full of hotlinked bukkaka pics.
BTW, stop PMing me, you're one weird fuck.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: August 31, 2009 09:25PM
You're the closest person this site has to a sex offender Bloody Blisters; especially after sending me those PMs full of hotlinked bukkaka pics.
BTW, stop PMing me, you're one weird fuck.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Basle
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:49PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
tpyMU
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:54PM
Re: What do you say to your partner after sex?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 23, 2011 02:06AM
Yeah, but you don't know who you are talking to on the internet and there is a good chance real sex offenders use this site waiting for a naive girl like you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 23, 2011 02:06AM
Yeah, but you don't know who you are talking to on the internet and there is a good chance real sex offenders use this site waiting for a naive girl like you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jNMkc
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:55PM
Re: Tinfoil Hat Thread/Conspiracy Theories Here
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 31, 2014 03:21PM
There are sex offenders posting on this site. Some haven't been caught yet.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 31, 2014 03:21PM
There are sex offenders posting on this site. Some haven't been caught yet.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Sex offender
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:55PM
Re: Suspected SERIAL KILLER Charles S. Severance Got 167 Votes in 1996
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 17, 2014 12:04PM
Just think of all the sex offenders, serial killers, child abusers, etc. that have used and posted on this site.....
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: March 17, 2014 12:04PM
Just think of all the sex offenders, serial killers, child abusers, etc. that have used and posted on this site.....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
bbVpe
()
Date: April 22, 2015 11:59PM
Re: The Truth about McSmack
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 02, 2012 10:18PM
You never know who you are talking to online, I would say it is safe to say that a few people that have frequented this site in the past are genuinely evil people.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 02, 2012 10:18PM
You never know who you are talking to online, I would say it is safe to say that a few people that have frequented this site in the past are genuinely evil people.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dwxmt
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:01AM
Re: sexually assualted vs. rape
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 30, 2010 02:20PM
If you look in the VA state police sex offender registry, there are soooooo many offenders that didn't commit rape. Sexual assault is an umbrella term.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: April 30, 2010 02:20PM
If you look in the VA state police sex offender registry, there are soooooo many offenders that didn't commit rape. Sexual assault is an umbrella term.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
E63Ht
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:15AM
Re: Rape?
Posted by: Both of you ()
Date: February 12, 2015 01:00AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not interested unless they're related to me.
Posted by: Both of you ()
Date: February 12, 2015 01:00AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not interested unless they're related to me.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Re: Rape Scenes In Movies Posted
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:22AM
Re: Rape Scenes In Movies
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 09, 2011 08:10PM
Joan of Arc with Milla Jovovich. There's a scene where a soldier is raping Milla's sister as she is dying and continues to have sex after she is dead.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/09/2011 08:12PM by eesh.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 09, 2011 08:10PM
Joan of Arc with Milla Jovovich. There's a scene where a soldier is raping Milla's sister as she is dying and continues to have sex after she is dead.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/09/2011 08:12PM by eesh.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nXjKD
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:22AM
Re: Rape Scenes In Movies
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 09, 2011 08:14PM
Anyone watch True Blood? There's a rape scene between two vampires, the guy twists the vampire woman's neck 180 degrees and continues to rape her, of course she is still living with a backwards head.
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 09, 2011 08:14PM
Anyone watch True Blood? There's a rape scene between two vampires, the guy twists the vampire woman's neck 180 degrees and continues to rape her, of course she is still living with a backwards head.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Re: Rape Scenes In Movies Posted
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:24AM
Re: Rape Scenes In Movies
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 10, 2011 09:08PM
For multiple rape scenes, check out 120 Days of Sodom made in the 70s. Very disturbing, especially the ending.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: February 10, 2011 09:08PM
For multiple rape scenes, check out 120 Days of Sodom made in the 70s. Very disturbing, especially the ending.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MICHAEL BASL aka eesh
()
Date: April 23, 2015 12:27AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
jUWpm
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:14AM
Re: pedophiles of fairfax underground...
Posted by: yagirll ()
Date: June 23, 2011 10:06PM
eesh is a pedo....fuck u eesh..ur on the top of my list...
Posted by: yagirll ()
Date: June 23, 2011 10:06PM
eesh is a pedo....fuck u eesh..ur on the top of my list...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nWGmV
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:16AM
Just realized that I was only banned for like 3 weeks
Posted by: yagirll ()
Date: May 31, 2012 04:45PM
Eyyy I guess in back lol I was like hmmmmm let me check if yagirll account works.... And it did lolololol in gonna take some screenshots to prove Eesh is a pedo
Posted by: yagirll ()
Date: May 31, 2012 04:45PM
Eyyy I guess in back lol I was like hmmmmm let me check if yagirll account works.... And it did lolololol in gonna take some screenshots to prove Eesh is a pedo
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xnPuu
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:21AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:39AM
yagirll, do you have a webcam?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:39AM
yagirll, do you have a webcam?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dKHmb
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:22AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:36AM
How often do you have sex?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:36AM
How often do you have sex?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:23AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:47AM
I'm still a senior in high school
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:47AM
I'm still a senior in high school
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
17 year old yagirll/sadgirl
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:27AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
The
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:29AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 01:28AM
Can you please delete the pictures that you have posted of me, thanks
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 01:28AM
Can you please delete the pictures that you have posted of me, thanks
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
To Eesh
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:31AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 10:03PM
Seriously I'm high and I can see it so clearly now. You want to control people but can't do it in the real world so you come on ffxu, start having different characters, names and personalities in order to control the outcome of people's thoughts, emotions and actions
Posted by: Sadgirl ()
Date: October 21, 2014 10:03PM
Seriously I'm high and I can see it so clearly now. You want to control people but can't do it in the real world so you come on ffxu, start having different characters, names and personalities in order to control the outcome of people's thoughts, emotions and actions
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
4Vnu6
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:33AM
Re: new picture
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:45PM
itchy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like the hot for teacher look. Do you have any
> naked?
She's underage, like 16.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:45PM
itchy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like the hot for teacher look. Do you have any
> naked?
She's underage, like 16.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
UMGLm
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:34AM
Re: new picture
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:47PM
It's alright, she looks old for her age.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:47PM
It's alright, she looks old for her age.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Same girl
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:41AM
Re: new picture
Posted by: oddfuture ()
Date: May 24, 2012 04:28PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> oddfuture Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I've lived in the same place almost 9 years thn
> I
> > moved somewhere else in nova and now I'm moing
> > somewhere else which I'm not gonna tell you
> > because y'all are gonna try to stalk me
>
>
>
>
> No, we've seen your pics, you aren't worth
> stalking. It's just weird that you look like you
> are living out of luggage....so you lived in the
> same place for nine years and now you are moving
> around like some nomadic gypsy.
>
Eesh, u are the one who somehow found my Facebook account ad old pone number.... So stfu bout the stalking thing and my family didn't have a foreclosure we had to get evicted from our old townhouse in fairfax because the government wouldn't pay for it anymore. Now I live with someone in my extended family and them I'm moving again on the last day of school
new picture
Posted by: oddfuture ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:39PM
uhhh yeah new pic for yall
http://tinypic.com/r/2aklqo9/6
oddfuture = yagirll = sadgirl, underage teen stalked/sexually harassed by Michael Basl
Posted by: oddfuture ()
Date: May 24, 2012 04:28PM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> oddfuture Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I've lived in the same place almost 9 years thn
> I
> > moved somewhere else in nova and now I'm moing
> > somewhere else which I'm not gonna tell you
> > because y'all are gonna try to stalk me
>
>
>
>
> No, we've seen your pics, you aren't worth
> stalking. It's just weird that you look like you
> are living out of luggage....so you lived in the
> same place for nine years and now you are moving
> around like some nomadic gypsy.
>
Eesh, u are the one who somehow found my Facebook account ad old pone number.... So stfu bout the stalking thing and my family didn't have a foreclosure we had to get evicted from our old townhouse in fairfax because the government wouldn't pay for it anymore. Now I live with someone in my extended family and them I'm moving again on the last day of school
new picture
Posted by: oddfuture ()
Date: May 23, 2012 09:39PM
uhhh yeah new pic for yall
http://tinypic.com/r/2aklqo9/6
oddfuture = yagirll = sadgirl, underage teen stalked/sexually harassed by Michael Basl
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
W H A T T H E F U C K ? ! ? ! ?
()
Date: April 23, 2015 02:38AM
W T F !?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
BEATNGU
()
Date: April 23, 2015 03:15AM
I am usually shocked and appalled by such things. I am only appalled, not shocked!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Ass Cracker
()
Date: April 23, 2015 01:07PM
Creepy
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Butthurt
()
Date: April 23, 2015 09:10PM
Michael Basl is very butthurt today
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
fap necro
()
Date: April 23, 2015 09:14PM
123456789
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tiny Penis Owner
()
Date: April 23, 2015 09:18PM
Who's dick is that?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
uberX
()
Date: April 23, 2015 09:40PM
^doesn't read Off-Topic
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tiny Penis Owner
()
Date: April 24, 2015 11:16AM
I see. It's the poster known as eesh or Michael Basl who has the tiny penis. That makes sense to why he's such an angry and bitter sub human who stalks and harasses people he doesn't know. This is probably a reason why he had to turn to homosexuality, he couldn't please a woman, besides his mother.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Yikes!
()
Date: April 24, 2015 12:39PM
Tiny Penis Owner Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> he couldn't please a woman, besides his mother.
-------------------------------------------------------
> he couldn't please a woman, besides his mother.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
curE us
()
Date: April 24, 2015 11:15PM
17 year old yagirll/sadgirl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
What does the sheet of paper say on the bottom?
-------------------------------------------------------
>
What does the sheet of paper say on the bottom?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Emo
()
Date: April 25, 2015 01:37PM
Emotion something
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
basl stalking katie eastman pjs
()
Date: April 25, 2015 02:36PM
basl has now turned his cyberbullying and harassment on to katie eastman from papa johns and her girlfriend !
stealing her fb pics
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1847744.html
making threads
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1847438.html
calling her at papa johns
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1842849/1845100.html#msg-1845100
katie has now attempted suicide
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1842849/1845072.html#msg-1845072
stealing her fb pics
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1847744.html
making threads
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1847438.html
calling her at papa johns
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1842849/1845100.html#msg-1845100
katie has now attempted suicide
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1842849/1845072.html#msg-1845072
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
called it !
()
Date: April 25, 2015 02:42PM
Re: No one is dumb enough to send death threats from here using their own name
Posted by: clairvoyance ()
Date: April 16, 2015 04:28PM
how much you wanna bet these two girls are going to end up being the next victims of eesh
Posted by: clairvoyance ()
Date: April 16, 2015 04:28PM
how much you wanna bet these two girls are going to end up being the next victims of eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Court date
()
Date: April 28, 2015 11:59PM
What is the court date?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Longo
()
Date: April 30, 2015 08:41AM
2016, 11 January
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Glaxo
()
Date: May 05, 2015 10:26AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Laugh out loud
()
Date: May 05, 2015 12:45PM
Michael Basl doesn't have ANY friends
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh is fat
()
Date: May 06, 2015 12:53AM
Laugh out loud Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Basl doesn't have ANY friends
It's because he's fat
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Basl doesn't have ANY friends
It's because he's fat
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
shortie
()
Date: May 06, 2015 01:16PM
he also has a little dingy.....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Time to face reality
()
Date: May 06, 2015 09:30PM
A jury is going to find him guilty. When he has to answer for what Misery did to him for him to do all that junk he will have nothing to say. Baby raping post that weren't directed at him aren't going to hold any water. Eesh will be paying Misery money for the rest of his life. It's bad enough he's having to spend money on a lawyer because of him.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
4110 Chain Bridge Road
()
Date: May 06, 2015 09:44PM
Longo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2016, 11 January
3:00PM
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2016, 11 January
3:00PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Yagirl/oddfuture/sadgirl
()
Date: May 10, 2015 04:13AM
Wow I missed a lot - Victoria
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Retch
()
Date: May 11, 2015 08:41AM
Yeah
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Missing Misserer
()
Date: May 11, 2015 11:37AM
You've missed nothing. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EESH WAS ARRESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
()
Date: May 11, 2015 10:31PM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1861898.html
Eesh arrested. Check Henrico court site tomorrow for charges!
Eesh arrested. Check Henrico court site tomorrow for charges!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
VbUPc
()
Date: May 11, 2015 11:01PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
96Uj9
()
Date: May 11, 2015 11:26PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh
()
Date: May 11, 2015 11:30PM
Yes, my mugshot (soon to be available) is a real 10/10. I was impressed with how good it turned out.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Humphrey
()
Date: May 11, 2015 11:51PM
Was all of this worth it? A lawsuit? Being arrested and facing jail time?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mug shot
()
Date: May 12, 2015 12:18AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, my mugshot (soon to be available) is a real
> 10/10. I was impressed with how good it turned
> out.
we do not need your mug shot to show how stupid you look right now
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, my mugshot (soon to be available) is a real
> 10/10. I was impressed with how good it turned
> out.
we do not need your mug shot to show how stupid you look right now
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Revenge porn charge
()
Date: May 12, 2015 02:30AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Wk
()
Date: May 12, 2015 09:01AM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dumber by the day
()
Date: May 12, 2015 01:01PM
ok i knew eesh was dumb but how dumb do you have to be to post your own social security number?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Black Box
()
Date: May 12, 2015 02:43PM
dumber by the day Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok i knew eesh was dumb but how dumb do you have
> to be to post your own social security number?
After he realized his idiotic mistake he quickly went back and blacked it out but it was too late, too funny!
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok i knew eesh was dumb but how dumb do you have
> to be to post your own social security number?
After he realized his idiotic mistake he quickly went back and blacked it out but it was too late, too funny!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Uhyyn
()
Date: May 12, 2015 09:59PM
you guys think it's funny to sue and have the mentally retarded homosexual schizoids arrested?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
creditKARMA.com
()
Date: May 12, 2015 10:01PM
Black Box Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> dumber by the day Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ok i knew eesh was dumb but how dumb do you
> have
> > to be to post your own social security number?
>
>
> After he realized his idiotic mistake he quickly
> went back and blacked it out but it was too late,
> too funny!
How's his credit currently?
I'm sure it's going to be fucked after Caan and other trolls starts opening lines of credit.
-------------------------------------------------------
> dumber by the day Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ok i knew eesh was dumb but how dumb do you
> have
> > to be to post your own social security number?
>
>
> After he realized his idiotic mistake he quickly
> went back and blacked it out but it was too late,
> too funny!
How's his credit currently?
I'm sure it's going to be fucked after Caan and other trolls starts opening lines of credit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Bossman
()
Date: May 13, 2015 03:53PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Unlawful dissemination
()
Date: May 15, 2015 03:30PM
Who was the complainant?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Court Dates for eesh
()
Date: May 22, 2015 08:15AM
eesh has court:
5/22
6/5
6/24
1/11
And a few more in between/after/coming up!
5/22
6/5
6/24
1/11
And a few more in between/after/coming up!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
legitquestion
()
Date: May 23, 2015 10:06PM
Are those screencaps/pics real or are they fakes?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
from court site
()
Date: May 23, 2015 10:10PM
legitquestion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are those screencaps/pics real or are they fakes?
they're real. go check the court website
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are those screencaps/pics real or are they fakes?
they're real. go check the court website
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
???...
()
Date: May 23, 2015 10:19PM
Court Dates for eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh has court:
> 5/22
> 6/5
> 6/24
> 1/11
>
> And a few more in between/after/coming up!
What's happening on June 5?
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh has court:
> 5/22
> 6/5
> 6/24
> 1/11
>
> And a few more in between/after/coming up!
What's happening on June 5?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Another protective order
()
Date: May 23, 2015 11:50PM
Apparently he is being served with another protective order and the hearing date is for June 5th
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh gets creeped out LOL!!!!!!!
()
Date: May 25, 2015 05:51PM
It's okay for Eesh to drive over 100 miles in the dead of night to stalk people, leave notes on their cars, vandalize their vehicles and describe in detail people's homes but it's not okay and is creepy when someone comes to court in the daylight and watches him...
Interesting!
And everything the OP said was 100% spot on!
Attachments:
Interesting!
And everything the OP said was 100% spot on!
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Everyone is getting justice now
()
Date: May 25, 2015 05:59PM
Another protective order Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently he is being served with another
> protective order and the hearing date is for June 5th
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently he is being served with another
> protective order and the hearing date is for June 5th
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
don't have to wait til jan
()
Date: May 25, 2015 06:08PM
hope a ton of posters turn out for the ffx date in two weeks to come back here and describe in detail what eesh was wearing to "creep him out" lol oh it's creepy wtf this guy is the biggest hypocrite ive ever seen
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cc
()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:05AM
Good grief...These proceedings are becoming tiresome. Now...Exactly WHO is complaining that eesh is stalking them? Haven't all of the aggrieved parties all ready filed some sort of legal proceedings? Whew...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
60 minutes
()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:09AM
I think it's only 3/30
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Maybe eesh should try to stop...
()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:10AM
Why won't Michael Basl just leave people alone?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Cc
()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:22AM
See Kings Dominion thread below....Interesting...Funny..Reason to visit FFXU.
Eesh, Toohey, Moreno, Lizzy threads...Not so much.
Eesh, Toohey, Moreno, Lizzy threads...Not so much.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Amen
()
Date: May 26, 2015 01:30AM
Maybe eesh should try to stop... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why won't Michael Basl just leave people alone?
+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why won't Michael Basl just leave people alone?
+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tiff
()
Date: May 28, 2015 04:55PM
Another protective order Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently he is being served with another
> protective order and the hearing date is for June 5th
Who's going? Seeing Eesh and Lizzie in the flesh should be interesting.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently he is being served with another
> protective order and the hearing date is for June 5th
Who's going? Seeing Eesh and Lizzie in the flesh should be interesting.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tiff
()
Date: May 28, 2015 04:57PM
I wonder if CourthouseObserver will be there. His predictions of the entire situation from day one came true.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Tiff
()
Date: May 28, 2015 05:00PM
Everyone is getting justice now Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another protective order Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Apparently he is being served with another
> > protective order and the hearing date is for
> June 5th
>
>
>
>
>
Eesh shouldn't even show up. There's no much he could even say, it's going to be put into effect anyway. Showing up would be a waste of his time and I'm sure a few people will actually end up going to this since it's so close and I doubt he's going to want that. Just stay home Eesh, it's a lose-lose either way.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another protective order Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Apparently he is being served with another
> > protective order and the hearing date is for
> June 5th
>
>
>
>
>
Eesh shouldn't even show up. There's no much he could even say, it's going to be put into effect anyway. Showing up would be a waste of his time and I'm sure a few people will actually end up going to this since it's so close and I doubt he's going to want that. Just stay home Eesh, it's a lose-lose either way.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Three Courtdates - June for eesh
()
Date: May 29, 2015 06:34PM
Fairfax General Courtroom 1D June 5th, 2PM - Lizzie vs eesh
Fairfax General June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
Henrico General June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
Fairfax General June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
Henrico General June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Courtrooms
()
Date: May 29, 2015 06:37PM
Fairfax General Courtroom 1D June 5th, 2PM - Lizzie vs eesh
Fairfax General Courtroom 4F June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
Henrico General Courtroom 2 June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
Fairfax General Courtroom 4F June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
Henrico General Courtroom 2 June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Incohootz
()
Date: May 29, 2015 07:19PM
Tiff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder if CourthouseObserver will be there. His
> predictions of the entire situation from day one
> came true.
I wonder why that is....
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder if CourthouseObserver will be there. His
> predictions of the entire situation from day one
> came true.
I wonder why that is....
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
CourthouseObserver
()
Date: May 30, 2015 09:22AM
No conspiracy. It was just all predictable.
Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that will have to occupy my time...
Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that will have to occupy my time...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
......
()
Date: May 30, 2015 11:07AM
CourthouseObserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No conspiracy. It was just all predictable.
>
> Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom
> scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that
> will have to occupy my time...
2pm is the time for the 5th
-------------------------------------------------------
> No conspiracy. It was just all predictable.
>
> Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom
> scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that
> will have to occupy my time...
2pm is the time for the 5th
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Expectations
()
Date: May 30, 2015 02:57PM
...... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No conspiracy. It was just all predictable.
> >
> > Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom
> > scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that
> > will have to occupy my time...
>
>
> 2pm is the time for the 5th
I think CourthouseObserver is just setting expectations. Trials that start in the morning can easily go into the afternoon. Not to mention the need to grab lunch afterward.
-------------------------------------------------------
> CourthouseObserver Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No conspiracy. It was just all predictable.
> >
> > Sadly, I have a trial in another courtroom
> > scheduled for the morning of the 5th, and that
> > will have to occupy my time...
>
>
> 2pm is the time for the 5th
I think CourthouseObserver is just setting expectations. Trials that start in the morning can easily go into the afternoon. Not to mention the need to grab lunch afterward.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
........
()
Date: May 30, 2015 04:33PM
Oh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
I read the court transcript
()
Date: June 01, 2015 06:27PM
It makes me wonder if Eesh was drunk when he went to court, you can tell all of the stuttering and stammering and hesitation he did in trying not to incriminate himself when certain things. He was asked how he got Mr. Misery's address he said his address was on the website - that's false. If you go back and see under the Mr. Misery banned thread, Eesh himself posted it. He also says he never did any extensive internet research on Mr. Misery or his family and that he's not good with computers. That's amazing!
I remember him reading and saying he wasn't impeached as a witness. The judge herself said Lizzie's testimony directly impeached Eesh as a witness and that she wasn't coming off discreditable even when the Commonwealth's Attorney tried to imply that Lizzie was testifying against Eesh because the bad blood between the two of themand that because of that; Mr. Misery was found not guilty.
Eesh is without a doubt; the biggest liar I have ever seen. He blatantly lied in court and does it here all of the time but calls everyone else a liar. To lie under oath about even the smallest things shows how much of a piece of shit he really is and deserves everything that he's getting. He wrote those death threats to himself and had Mr. Misery arrested for it. Went as far as contacting Victim Services and wasting their time and resources, pretending to be such a helpless, scared victim over typed words from a screen that he sent himself. It's sick and I doubt many people here can even comprehend the magnitude of that. Mr. Misery has every right to sue Eesh for everything he's done to him and his family.
This goes far beyond just being trolled on here. This is messing with someone's freedom purposely and for no real reason other than an Internet feud and everyone else who's doing something about him legally; I wish all the best and more power to you. I can't wait for the transcript to go here. Eesh is truly a person who will burn in hell for what he's done to people.
For all of your Eesh apologist, I doubt you'll be kissing his ass after you read that transcript. It is truly unbelievable. Believe nothing Eesh says, ever. Absolutely everything he says is a lie. If he has no problem lying in court then lying here is nothing to him and he had been shown to be a liar but I didn't know it went this deep.
I remember him reading and saying he wasn't impeached as a witness. The judge herself said Lizzie's testimony directly impeached Eesh as a witness and that she wasn't coming off discreditable even when the Commonwealth's Attorney tried to imply that Lizzie was testifying against Eesh because the bad blood between the two of themand that because of that; Mr. Misery was found not guilty.
Eesh is without a doubt; the biggest liar I have ever seen. He blatantly lied in court and does it here all of the time but calls everyone else a liar. To lie under oath about even the smallest things shows how much of a piece of shit he really is and deserves everything that he's getting. He wrote those death threats to himself and had Mr. Misery arrested for it. Went as far as contacting Victim Services and wasting their time and resources, pretending to be such a helpless, scared victim over typed words from a screen that he sent himself. It's sick and I doubt many people here can even comprehend the magnitude of that. Mr. Misery has every right to sue Eesh for everything he's done to him and his family.
This goes far beyond just being trolled on here. This is messing with someone's freedom purposely and for no real reason other than an Internet feud and everyone else who's doing something about him legally; I wish all the best and more power to you. I can't wait for the transcript to go here. Eesh is truly a person who will burn in hell for what he's done to people.
For all of your Eesh apologist, I doubt you'll be kissing his ass after you read that transcript. It is truly unbelievable. Believe nothing Eesh says, ever. Absolutely everything he says is a lie. If he has no problem lying in court then lying here is nothing to him and he had been shown to be a liar but I didn't know it went this deep.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
SticksStonesWords
()
Date: June 01, 2015 06:53PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Today in 4J @ 10AM in Fairfax
()
Date: June 12, 2015 01:19AM
Courtrooms Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax General Courtroom 4J June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax General Courtroom 4J June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lizzie vs eesh July 10
()
Date: June 12, 2015 10:39AM
Eesh was served with Lizzie's protective order in court today; after 23 days of evading service! The new date for that is July 10!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Computers no more
()
Date: June 12, 2015 02:49PM
Today, the judge granted a motion to compel. Basl has 30 days to turn over his computers and cell phones to Misery and Co.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
only 12 more days
()
Date: June 12, 2015 06:27PM
he has lost every single time he has stepped into a court room
his criminal charges of revenge porn and harassment on the 24th is going to be great
his criminal charges of revenge porn and harassment on the 24th is going to be great
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mr smartguy
()
Date: June 12, 2015 07:09PM
He violated the restraining order regarding Liz already by posting the affidavit in off topic. He was warned not to
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Don't need a ghost writer
()
Date: June 12, 2015 07:37PM
mr smartguy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He violated the restraining order regarding Liz
> already by posting the affidavit in off topic. He was warned not to
Stop typing shit. You don't know what you're talking about lol.
He wasn't warned on anything. It was told to someone if he does it'll be used against him and be frowned upon by the judge and just used as more evidence of his harassment.
-------------------------------------------------------
> He violated the restraining order regarding Liz
> already by posting the affidavit in off topic. He was warned not to
Stop typing shit. You don't know what you're talking about lol.
He wasn't warned on anything. It was told to someone if he does it'll be used against him and be frowned upon by the judge and just used as more evidence of his harassment.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh posted this
()
Date: June 22, 2015 02:11PM
Lizzie vs eesh July 10 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh was served with Lizzie's protective order in
> court today; after 23 days of evading service! The
> new date for that is July 10!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh was served with Lizzie's protective order in
> court today; after 23 days of evading service! The
> new date for that is July 10!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
who else
()
Date: June 24, 2015 07:43AM
is anyone going to see this mornings court antics?? I was thinking about showing up, but I don't want to stick out.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Muppesto
()
Date: June 24, 2015 07:49AM
who else Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> is anyone going to see this mornings court
> antics?? I was thinking about showing up, but I
> don't want to stick out.
And your any different than the rest of the Muppets that will be showing up?
-------------------------------------------------------
> is anyone going to see this mornings court
> antics?? I was thinking about showing up, but I
> don't want to stick out.
And your any different than the rest of the Muppets that will be showing up?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
who else
()
Date: June 24, 2015 08:01AM
Muppesto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who else Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > is anyone going to see this mornings court
> > antics?? I was thinking about showing up, but I
> > don't want to stick out.
>
>
> And your any different than the rest of the
> Muppets that will be showing up?
well, I've never been arrested, so yeah, I'm different.
-------------------------------------------------------
> who else Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > is anyone going to see this mornings court
> > antics?? I was thinking about showing up, but I
> > don't want to stick out.
>
>
> And your any different than the rest of the
> Muppets that will be showing up?
well, I've never been arrested, so yeah, I'm different.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
So confused
()
Date: June 24, 2015 08:21AM
Is eesh in two separate trials, one at 9:30 and one at 11:00? Or are they related?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
who else
()
Date: June 24, 2015 08:23AM
So confused Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is eesh in two separate trials, one at 9:30 and
> one at 11:00? Or are they related?
I also am curious about this
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is eesh in two separate trials, one at 9:30 and
> one at 11:00? Or are they related?
I also am curious about this
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
nhf
()
Date: June 24, 2015 09:06AM
I'm curious how Megan and Monique are getting to the courthouse, since neither of them have a valid license.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Reading is fundemental
()
Date: June 24, 2015 09:18AM
You guys don't know how to read apparently.
How do you think eesh will be in Fairfax court at 930 and in Henrico court at 11?
Try reading that document over...
How do you think eesh will be in Fairfax court at 930 and in Henrico court at 11?
Try reading that document over...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stupid Ediots
()
Date: June 24, 2015 10:08AM
Three Courtdates - June for eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax General Courtroom 1D June 5th, 2PM -
> Lizzie vs eesh
> Fairfax General June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
> Henrico General June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
DAMN IT!!!! I wanted to go to today court in FFX!!! I was even planning to go this morning, and then I decided to switch with someone! This one was in FFX co so I was going to record it!!!! damn it!.
BTW even though she knows me there are ways to get video without her seeing me as I work there. might send and intern over to see if they are done yet...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax General Courtroom 1D June 5th, 2PM -
> Lizzie vs eesh
> Fairfax General June 12th, 10AM - Misery vs eesh
> Henrico General June 24th 11AM - Megan vs eesh
DAMN IT!!!! I wanted to go to today court in FFX!!! I was even planning to go this morning, and then I decided to switch with someone! This one was in FFX co so I was going to record it!!!! damn it!.
BTW even though she knows me there are ways to get video without her seeing me as I work there. might send and intern over to see if they are done yet...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Friday
()
Date: June 24, 2015 10:14AM
No Fairfax court. That's on Friday. Then eesh has court again in Fairfax on July 10. It's all just him going.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
weird guy in blue shit
()
Date: June 24, 2015 12:49PM
Weird guy in blue shirt I got your picture
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Threats to come?
()
Date: June 24, 2015 12:52PM
Lol yes Lizzie, we know. And what is it that you want blue shirt man to do for you so that you don't disparage him on your favorite reputation-ruining site?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Diving Diver
()
Date: June 24, 2015 01:11PM
weird guy in blue shit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Weird guy in blue shirt I got your picture
You numb cunt.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Weird guy in blue shirt I got your picture
You numb cunt.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
UEYkW
()
Date: June 24, 2015 01:18PM
Interesting that eesh is not in jail yet?
So we still only have 2 outed posters that have been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has been to jail? - I have no idea.
So we still only have 2 outed posters that have been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has been to jail? - I have no idea.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WoopWoop
()
Date: June 24, 2015 01:30PM
UEYkW Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting that eesh is not in jail yet?
>
> So we still only have 2 outed posters that have
> been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has been
> to jail? - I have no idea.
Yes, she has been to jail. She doesn't try to hide that.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting that eesh is not in jail yet?
>
> So we still only have 2 outed posters that have
> been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has been
> to jail? - I have no idea.
Yes, she has been to jail. She doesn't try to hide that.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
PEtVe
()
Date: June 24, 2015 01:49PM
WoopWoop Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> UEYkW Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Interesting that eesh is not in jail yet?
> >
> > So we still only have 2 outed posters that have
> > been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has
> been
> > to jail? - I have no idea.
>
>
> Yes, she has been to jail. She doesn't try to hide
> that.
no one asked if she tried to hide it dumbfuck, only if she had been in jail or not
so we have 3 outed posters who have been to jail - liz, frisky and meg
-------------------------------------------------------
> UEYkW Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Interesting that eesh is not in jail yet?
> >
> > So we still only have 2 outed posters that have
> > been to jail. Liz and frisky, unless meg has
> been
> > to jail? - I have no idea.
>
>
> Yes, she has been to jail. She doesn't try to hide
> that.
no one asked if she tried to hide it dumbfuck, only if she had been in jail or not
so we have 3 outed posters who have been to jail - liz, frisky and meg
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
EESH IS GUILTY HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
()
Date: June 24, 2015 01:55PM
GUILTY OF REVENGE PORN
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
last one
()
Date: June 24, 2015 05:47PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
xNJpG
()
Date: June 24, 2015 06:19PM
$91 and probation
YAWN
let us know when something actually happens
YAWN
let us know when something actually happens
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
WaPo
()
Date: June 24, 2015 06:33PM
Just wait until the Washington Post story on this runs
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eeeehhhh
()
Date: June 24, 2015 06:45PM
Was he ever locked up?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
losing all over the place
()
Date: June 24, 2015 08:17PM
xNJpG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> $91 and probation
>
>
> YAWN
>
>
> let us know when something actually happens
Lol this is something to eesh and so are the protective orders
-------------------------------------------------------
> $91 and probation
>
>
> YAWN
>
>
> let us know when something actually happens
Lol this is something to eesh and so are the protective orders
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Loudoun County Court
()
Date: July 10, 2015 01:09PM
Trial has been moved to Loudoun County Courts!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Second Lawsuit
()
Date: July 11, 2015 05:18PM
Michael Basl being sued for malicious prosecution.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Stop - Enough
()
Date: July 21, 2015 07:16PM
Stop
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
apology
()
Date: July 23, 2015 11:12AM
apologize
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
real winner
()
Date: July 23, 2015 11:53AM
Re: Sadgirls daily photo thread
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 10:23PM
Sadgirl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You already told me you were ralph. My theory is
> that you have mutiple computers, maybe 3 and
> another device that you post from
I call it the command center. I have four laptops and my cell phone, not to mention at three different browsers on each computer.
I usually am logged into 10 different screen names at once.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Options: Reply•Quote
Attachments:
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 21, 2014 10:23PM
Sadgirl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You already told me you were ralph. My theory is
> that you have mutiple computers, maybe 3 and
> another device that you post from
I call it the command center. I have four laptops and my cell phone, not to mention at three different browsers on each computer.
I usually am logged into 10 different screen names at once.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"
Options: Reply•Quote
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
y9L6H
()
Date: November 16, 2015 01:42PM
Second Lawsuit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Basl being sued for malicious prosecution.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Basl being sued for malicious prosecution.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
bbv
()
Date: November 21, 2015 08:27PM
good
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Northman possibly found
()
Date: November 28, 2015 11:42PM
Fairfax man's ISP to be subpoenaed; if he is not revealed to be TheNorthman, there is nothing at all to worry about.
Nobody panic.
Careful what you reveal to people. Careful how you react when the thing revealed is somewhat casually mentioned in passing...
Nobody panic.
Careful what you reveal to people. Careful how you react when the thing revealed is somewhat casually mentioned in passing...
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Moreno claims he raped a baby
()
Date: December 01, 2015 10:15PM
Northman possibly found Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax man's ISP to be subpoenaed; if he is not
> revealed to be TheNorthman, there is nothing at
> all to worry about.
>
> Nobody panic.
William Moreno, according to your post you raped and killed a baby. Should I panic?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fairfax man's ISP to be subpoenaed; if he is not
> revealed to be TheNorthman, there is nothing at
> all to worry about.
>
> Nobody panic.
William Moreno, according to your post you raped and killed a baby. Should I panic?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
basl arrested by moreno
()
Date: December 10, 2015 10:57PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
basl
()
Date: December 10, 2015 10:59PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mikey47
()
Date: December 11, 2015 12:03AM
Turn $6 into $1,000’s!!! No Scam, Read!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIS REALLY CAN MAKE YOU EASY
MONEY!! IT WORKS !!! BUT YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW IT TO THE LETTER FOR IT TO
WORK!!!!
A little while back, I was browsing through newsgroup, just
like you are now and came across an article similar to this that said
you could make thousands dollars within weeks with only an initial
investment of $6.00! So I thought, “Yeah, right, this must be a scam”,
but like most of us, I was curious, so I kept reading. : Anyway, it
said that you send $1.00 to each of the 6 names and address stated in
the article. You then place your own name and address in the bottom of
the list at #6, and post the article in at least 200 newsgroup. (There
are thousands) No catch, that was it. So after thinking it over, and
talking to few people first, I thought about trying it. I figured what
have I got to lose except 6 stamps and $6.00, right? Like most of us I
was a little skeptical and a little worried about the legal aspects of
it : All, So I checked it out with the U.S. Post Office and they confirmed that it is indeed legal! Then I
invested the measly $6.00. Well GUESS WHAT!!?. Within 7 days, I started
getting money in the mail! I was shocked! I figured it would end soon,
but the money just kept coming in. In my first week, I made about
$25.00. By the end second week I had made a total over $1,000.00! In
the third week I had over $10,000.00 and it’s still growing. This is
now my fourth week and I have made a total of just over $42,000.00 and
it’s still coming in rapidly. Its : Certainly worth $6.00, and 6
stamps, I have spent more than that on the lottery!! Let me tell you
HOW this works and most importantly, WHY it works! Also, make sure you
print a copy of this article NOW, so you can get the information off of
it as you need it.
STEP 1: Get 6 separate pieces of paper and write the
following on each piece of paper “PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST.”
STEP 2: Now get 6 US $1.00 bills and place ONE inside EACH of the 6 pieces of
paper so the bill will not be seen through the envelope to prevent
thievery.
STEP 3: Next, place one paper in each stating the above phrase, your
name and address, and a $1.00 bill. What you are doing is creating a
service by this. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL!
STEP 4: Mail the 6 envelopes to the
following addresses:
#1)Tony Childs 5339 east ocean blvd. # F, Long Beach,Ca 90803
#2)Tawny Cole 3512 Lockport St. Las Vegas, NV 89129
#3)Matthew Dickerson, 548 Lake St, Morgantown WV 26505
#4) Chad Hinkle
701 Western Apt 319 97501
#5) Erika Evans, 1103 forest ave, bronx NY, 10456
#6) Milad Abadi, 7749 Quail Run Lane, Manassas, Va, 20109
STEP 5: Now take the #1 name off the list that you see above, move the
other names up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc?.) and add YOUR Name as
number 6 on the list.
STEP 6: Change anything you need to, but try to
keep this article as close to original as possible.
STEP 7: Now, post your
amended article to at least 200 newsgroups, message board. (I think
there are close to 24,000 groups) All you need is 200, but remember,
the more you post, the more money you make!
SO START NOW!!!!!
REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS OR MESSAGE BOARD YOU
POST IN, THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!!
BUT YOU HAVE TO POST A MINIMUM OF 200**
That’s it! You will begin
receiving money from around the world within days! You may eventually
can rent a P.O. Box due to the large amount of mail you will receive.
If you wish to stay anonymous, you can invent a name to use, as long as
the postman will deliver it.
**JUST MAKE SURE ALL THE ADDRESSES ARE
CORRECT. ** :
Now the WHY part: Out of 200 postings, say I receive only
5 replies (a very low example). So then I Made $5.00 with my name at #6
on the letter. Now, each of the 5 persons who just sent me $1.00 make
the MINIMUM 200 postings, each with my name at #5 and only 5 persons
respond to each of the original 5, that is another $25.00 for me, now
those 25 each make 200 MINIMUM posts with my name at #4 and only 5
replies each, I will bring in an additional :$125.00! Now, those 125
persons turn around and post the MINIMUM 200 with my name at #3 and
only receive 5 replies each, I will make an additional $625.00! OK, now
here is the fun part, each of those 625 persons post a MINIMUM 200
letters with my name at #2 and they only receive 5 replies, that just
made me $3,125.00!!! Those 3,125 persons will all deliver this message
to 200 newsgroups with my name at #1 and if still 5 persons per 200
newsgroups react I will receive $15,625.00! With an original investment
of only $6.00! AMAZING! When your name is no longer on the list, you
just take latest posting in the newsgroups, and send out another $6.00
to names on the list, putting your name at number 6 again. And start
posting again. The thing to remember is, do you realize that thousands
of people all over the world are joining the internet and reading these
articles everyday, JUST LIKE YOU are now!! So can you afford $6.. and
see if it really works!! I know it to be true! People have said, ‘what
if the plan is played out and no one sends you: the money? So what are
the chances of that happening when there are tons of new honest users
and new honest people who are joining the internet and newsgroups
everyday and are willing to give it a try? Estimates are at 20,000 to
50,000 new users, every day, with thousands of those joining the actual
Internet. Remember, play FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will work. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?!?!?!?!?
——————————————————–
Seriously,
most people think this is a scam, but you actually do get thousands of
dollars out of it, it is NOT another stupid scam, if people follow
through with sending out $6, it works!!!!!
THIS REALLY CAN MAKE YOU EASY
MONEY!! IT WORKS !!! BUT YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW IT TO THE LETTER FOR IT TO
WORK!!!!
A little while back, I was browsing through newsgroup, just
like you are now and came across an article similar to this that said
you could make thousands dollars within weeks with only an initial
investment of $6.00! So I thought, “Yeah, right, this must be a scam”,
but like most of us, I was curious, so I kept reading. : Anyway, it
said that you send $1.00 to each of the 6 names and address stated in
the article. You then place your own name and address in the bottom of
the list at #6, and post the article in at least 200 newsgroup. (There
are thousands) No catch, that was it. So after thinking it over, and
talking to few people first, I thought about trying it. I figured what
have I got to lose except 6 stamps and $6.00, right? Like most of us I
was a little skeptical and a little worried about the legal aspects of
it : All, So I checked it out with the U.S. Post Office and they confirmed that it is indeed legal! Then I
invested the measly $6.00. Well GUESS WHAT!!?. Within 7 days, I started
getting money in the mail! I was shocked! I figured it would end soon,
but the money just kept coming in. In my first week, I made about
$25.00. By the end second week I had made a total over $1,000.00! In
the third week I had over $10,000.00 and it’s still growing. This is
now my fourth week and I have made a total of just over $42,000.00 and
it’s still coming in rapidly. Its : Certainly worth $6.00, and 6
stamps, I have spent more than that on the lottery!! Let me tell you
HOW this works and most importantly, WHY it works! Also, make sure you
print a copy of this article NOW, so you can get the information off of
it as you need it.
STEP 1: Get 6 separate pieces of paper and write the
following on each piece of paper “PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST.”
STEP 2: Now get 6 US $1.00 bills and place ONE inside EACH of the 6 pieces of
paper so the bill will not be seen through the envelope to prevent
thievery.
STEP 3: Next, place one paper in each stating the above phrase, your
name and address, and a $1.00 bill. What you are doing is creating a
service by this. THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL!
STEP 4: Mail the 6 envelopes to the
following addresses:
#1)Tony Childs 5339 east ocean blvd. # F, Long Beach,Ca 90803
#2)Tawny Cole 3512 Lockport St. Las Vegas, NV 89129
#3)Matthew Dickerson, 548 Lake St, Morgantown WV 26505
#4) Chad Hinkle
701 Western Apt 319 97501
#5) Erika Evans, 1103 forest ave, bronx NY, 10456
#6) Milad Abadi, 7749 Quail Run Lane, Manassas, Va, 20109
STEP 5: Now take the #1 name off the list that you see above, move the
other names up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc?.) and add YOUR Name as
number 6 on the list.
STEP 6: Change anything you need to, but try to
keep this article as close to original as possible.
STEP 7: Now, post your
amended article to at least 200 newsgroups, message board. (I think
there are close to 24,000 groups) All you need is 200, but remember,
the more you post, the more money you make!
SO START NOW!!!!!
REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS OR MESSAGE BOARD YOU
POST IN, THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!!
BUT YOU HAVE TO POST A MINIMUM OF 200**
That’s it! You will begin
receiving money from around the world within days! You may eventually
can rent a P.O. Box due to the large amount of mail you will receive.
If you wish to stay anonymous, you can invent a name to use, as long as
the postman will deliver it.
**JUST MAKE SURE ALL THE ADDRESSES ARE
CORRECT. ** :
Now the WHY part: Out of 200 postings, say I receive only
5 replies (a very low example). So then I Made $5.00 with my name at #6
on the letter. Now, each of the 5 persons who just sent me $1.00 make
the MINIMUM 200 postings, each with my name at #5 and only 5 persons
respond to each of the original 5, that is another $25.00 for me, now
those 25 each make 200 MINIMUM posts with my name at #4 and only 5
replies each, I will bring in an additional :$125.00! Now, those 125
persons turn around and post the MINIMUM 200 with my name at #3 and
only receive 5 replies each, I will make an additional $625.00! OK, now
here is the fun part, each of those 625 persons post a MINIMUM 200
letters with my name at #2 and they only receive 5 replies, that just
made me $3,125.00!!! Those 3,125 persons will all deliver this message
to 200 newsgroups with my name at #1 and if still 5 persons per 200
newsgroups react I will receive $15,625.00! With an original investment
of only $6.00! AMAZING! When your name is no longer on the list, you
just take latest posting in the newsgroups, and send out another $6.00
to names on the list, putting your name at number 6 again. And start
posting again. The thing to remember is, do you realize that thousands
of people all over the world are joining the internet and reading these
articles everyday, JUST LIKE YOU are now!! So can you afford $6.. and
see if it really works!! I know it to be true! People have said, ‘what
if the plan is played out and no one sends you: the money? So what are
the chances of that happening when there are tons of new honest users
and new honest people who are joining the internet and newsgroups
everyday and are willing to give it a try? Estimates are at 20,000 to
50,000 new users, every day, with thousands of those joining the actual
Internet. Remember, play FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will work. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?!?!?!?!?
——————————————————–
Seriously,
most people think this is a scam, but you actually do get thousands of
dollars out of it, it is NOT another stupid scam, if people follow
through with sending out $6, it works!!!!!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A Fine Young Lad
()
Date: January 27, 2016 05:58AM
Former missing teen Tj Sadler is on the case!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
out on bail
()
Date: January 29, 2016 08:18AM
goin down
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Woulda Coulda
()
Date: January 30, 2016 10:22PM
Does anyone believe that Michael Basl or Monique Wells might have had a chance to lead a productive life in this world had they not decided to obsess on Fairfax Underground? What might they be doing today if not caught up in their own personal disasters here?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Reality!
()
Date: January 30, 2016 10:29PM
Lizzie doesn't have a personal disease here. She's not the one in therapy or cutting her wrists over it or wasting her parents hundreds of thousands of dollars in a frivolous lawsuit, like William Moreno.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Good Samaritan
()
Date: January 30, 2016 11:11PM
I'm good, lol. I'm not a party in the lawsuit and decided not to testify and am thankful my life doesn't have to revolve around any of this anymore.
#TEAMFUCKYOUALL
Attachments:
#TEAMFUCKYOUALL
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
088
()
Date: January 30, 2016 11:19PM
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
INTERNET PERSECUTOR
()
Date: January 30, 2016 11:22PM
"Internet persecution" lol, get the fuck outta here!
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Terrible
()
Date: January 31, 2016 01:46AM
Can't believe someone made that cake.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Vet
()
Date: January 31, 2016 03:14AM
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/728588/728742.html#msg-728742
I hope all the veterans drop dead. Yes, let's celebrate a bunch of burnouts and trailer trash who were dumb enough to sign up for an illegal occupation, and weak enough to follow and march in lock step. I love people who get together in a giant group of other people and do the exact same thing as everyone else, like ants in a colony, then go out and shoot brown-skinned shopkeepers and civilians in the face. It's great when humans get together in a big, autonomous group and act as one......like the Borg, from Star Trek. That's my favorite thing about the human species. Please, let's have a holiday to celebrate these mindless cogs in the machine.
you're a veteran, so what?
drop dead.
I hope all the veterans drop dead. Yes, let's celebrate a bunch of burnouts and trailer trash who were dumb enough to sign up for an illegal occupation, and weak enough to follow and march in lock step. I love people who get together in a giant group of other people and do the exact same thing as everyone else, like ants in a colony, then go out and shoot brown-skinned shopkeepers and civilians in the face. It's great when humans get together in a big, autonomous group and act as one......like the Borg, from Star Trek. That's my favorite thing about the human species. Please, let's have a holiday to celebrate these mindless cogs in the machine.
you're a veteran, so what?
drop dead.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Shoulda
()
Date: January 31, 2016 11:03PM
Woulda Coulda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone believe that Michael Basl or Monique
> Wells might have had a chance to lead a productive
> life in this world had they not decided to obsess
> on Fairfax Underground?
Possibly. Too late now.
>What might they be doing
> today if not caught up in their own personal
> disasters here?
They would have never met, and the double negative of their togetherness would not have happened.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does anyone believe that Michael Basl or Monique
> Wells might have had a chance to lead a productive
> life in this world had they not decided to obsess
> on Fairfax Underground?
Possibly. Too late now.
>What might they be doing
> today if not caught up in their own personal
> disasters here?
They would have never met, and the double negative of their togetherness would not have happened.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
kslhfuck
()
Date: February 03, 2016 04:57AM
Notice how the liberals who post here are felons, pervs and/or mentally ill?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Michael Josef Basl's Mugshot
()
Date: March 07, 2016 10:19AM
eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, my mugshot (soon to be available) is a real
> 10/10. I was impressed with how good it turned
> out.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, my mugshot (soon to be available) is a real
> 10/10. I was impressed with how good it turned
> out.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Correction
()
Date: March 12, 2016 11:42AM
No problems Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Basl is a homosexual child predator
More like a homosexual psychopath.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Basl is a homosexual child predator
More like a homosexual psychopath.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
3JJ7wV
()
Date: March 12, 2016 12:58PM
William Moreno aka "Mr. Misery" and "Jimmylegs" is a child predator.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Moreno Madness
()
Date: March 12, 2016 12:59PM
.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Lifetime
()
Date: March 13, 2016 03:44PM
When is the movie being made?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Time flies
()
Date: March 13, 2016 05:28PM
This thread is one year old today!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
October
()
Date: March 14, 2016 03:36PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Harrison
()
Date: March 20, 2016 07:11PM
Lifetime Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When is the movie being made?
Filming now
-------------------------------------------------------
> When is the movie being made?
Filming now
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
muggy
()
Date: March 21, 2016 07:15PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
TX3DY
()
Date: March 21, 2016 07:18PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Warrant
()
Date: March 21, 2016 07:28PM
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Can't hold all these court dates
()
Date: April 03, 2016 02:08PM
xTFuj
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
the Spam Bot
()
Date: April 04, 2016 12:55AM
What a boo hoo baby Richard Moreno is, WAH, Basl honked his horn.
lol
lol
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
scared of the horn honking man
()
Date: April 04, 2016 09:01AM
the Spam Bot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a boo hoo baby Richard Moreno is, WAH, Basl
> honked his horn.
>
> lol
The intimidation!
-------------------------------------------------------
> What a boo hoo baby Richard Moreno is, WAH, Basl
> honked his horn.
>
> lol
The intimidation!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Basl loses again
()
Date: April 04, 2016 09:24AM
Laugh all you want, that honking horn is the reason Mr. Basl was denied bail just a few minutes ago HHAHAHAH
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Basl bond revoked
()
Date: April 04, 2016 11:03AM
Lolollololllll
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
DOC number
()
Date: April 05, 2016 07:49AM
MVYHd
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Face of a terrorist
()
Date: April 23, 2016 12:00AM
Michael Basl Richmond VA
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Waka
()
Date: April 28, 2016 01:02AM
Flocka
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
House for sale in Henrico
()
Date: June 06, 2016 03:44PM
Basl had to have his 79 year old dad bail him out of jail twice this year
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
kangaroo kourt
()
Date: June 06, 2016 04:18PM
October Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?40,file=223735,filename=image.jpeg>
An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch and receive counseling.
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
> hp?40,file=223735,filename=image.jpeg>
An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch and receive counseling.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
12 Angry Men
()
Date: June 06, 2016 04:26PM
Will they be sequestered? This is a pretty big trial you know. Some scurry shit going on.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
et7F3
()
Date: June 06, 2016 04:28PM
kangaroo kourt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> October Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
>
> > hp?40,file=223735,filename=image.jpeg>
>
>
>
> An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the
> jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch
> and receive counseling.
I had to laugh about the above comment.
It I was in the jury pool and had any idea what was behind door #3, I would somehow figure a way to be passed over in the the voir dire process.
-------------------------------------------------------
> October Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/file.p
>
> > hp?40,file=223735,filename=image.jpeg>
>
>
>
> An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the
> jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch
> and receive counseling.
I had to laugh about the above comment.
It I was in the jury pool and had any idea what was behind door #3, I would somehow figure a way to be passed over in the the voir dire process.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
which side did this?
()
Date: June 06, 2016 05:45PM
Meade got his subpoena.
Which side served it?
What is Meade going to wear to the proceeding?
Will he be asked to perform?
Which side served it?
What is Meade going to wear to the proceeding?
Will he be asked to perform?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
A little bird told me
()
Date: June 06, 2016 06:38PM
which side did this? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade got his subpoena.
> Which side served it?
>
> What is Meade going to wear to the proceeding?
>
> Will he be asked to perform?
Eesh's attorney: Mr. Skelton you have previously stated you have seen William Moreno's penis. Would you call it an 'inny' or 'outty'?
Meade: I saw an 'inny', but keep in mind I have only seen it when it was erect.
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meade got his subpoena.
> Which side served it?
>
> What is Meade going to wear to the proceeding?
>
> Will he be asked to perform?
Eesh's attorney: Mr. Skelton you have previously stated you have seen William Moreno's penis. Would you call it an 'inny' or 'outty'?
Meade: I saw an 'inny', but keep in mind I have only seen it when it was erect.
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
TdVXP
()
Date: June 06, 2016 07:49PM
the miz obsessed fag will never die
same shit every day and night
same shit every day and night
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh the moron
()
Date: June 06, 2016 08:15PM
TdVXP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the miz obsessed fag will never die
>
> same shit every day and night
No fucking shit.
-------------------------------------------------------
> the miz obsessed fag will never die
>
> same shit every day and night
No fucking shit.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
mN7YW
()
Date: June 06, 2016 10:51PM
kangaroo kourt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the
> jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch
> and receive counseling.
this has happened before
-------------------------------------------------------
> An 8 day trial? I feel so sorry for the
> jury...they will have to be put on suicide watch
> and receive counseling.
this has happened before
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
International newsletter
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:13PM
12 Angry Men Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will they be sequestered? This is a pretty big
> trial you know. Some scurry shit going on.
Could be. It is a story that went world wide and will be covered news stations.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Will they be sequestered? This is a pretty big
> trial you know. Some scurry shit going on.
Could be. It is a story that went world wide and will be covered news stations.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Teddy Klinsmann
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:32PM
The northman is eesh
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
b3DGY
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:35PM
eesh the moron Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TdVXP Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > the miz obsessed fag will never die
> >
> > same shit every day and night
>
>
> No fucking shit.
It's Basl.
-------------------------------------------------------
> TdVXP Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > the miz obsessed fag will never die
> >
> > same shit every day and night
>
>
> No fucking shit.
It's Basl.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
dE7YK
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:39PM
kslhfuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Notice how the liberals who post here are felons,
> pervs and/or mentally ill?
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> Notice how the liberals who post here are felons,
> pervs and/or mentally ill?
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
vTvVx
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:41PM
A Fine Young Lad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Former missing teen Tj Sadler is on the case!
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
> Former missing teen Tj Sadler is on the case!
+1
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
23,465
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:42PM
.
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
h37nF
()
Date: June 06, 2016 11:43PM
/
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Mother Fucker
()
Date: June 07, 2016 12:05AM
TdVXP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the miz obsessed fag will never die
>
> same shit every day and night
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the miz obsessed fag will never die
>
> same shit every day and night
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
9z
()
Date: June 20, 2016 12:40PM
Days until jail
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
cHbL4
()
Date: July 28, 2016 12:36AM
,
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
William Moreno Rapes Children
()
Date: July 28, 2016 01:11AM
Wait so TJ Sadler was raped by William Moreno?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Refuck
()
Date: July 28, 2016 01:58AM
Tj is a witness FOR William, you dolt.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
DU6LX
()
Date: August 15, 2016 07:28AM
Basl investigation
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Eesh's mom died of cancer lol
()
Date: August 26, 2016 12:48AM
Michael Josef Basl's mother
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
LmcCb
()
Date: August 26, 2016 01:39AM
Eesh's mom died of cancer lol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Josef Basl's mother
the obsessing by this poster is going to lead to their suicide
-------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Josef Basl's mother
the obsessing by this poster is going to lead to their suicide
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
revanent
()
Date: April 16, 2018 09:19PM
This thread deserves to be brought to the fore.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Got It.
()
Date: April 16, 2018 09:49PM
Lesson Learned: You can get sued For Harrassing people on Fairfax underground.
https://wtop.com/loudoun-county/2016/11/va-family-wins-internet-trolling-case/
https://wtop.com/loudoun-county/2016/11/va-family-wins-internet-trolling-case/
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
this is a classic thread
()
Date: April 16, 2018 10:15PM
I'm so happy to see folks on the general forum once again taking an interest in eeshlizmizmeg.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
STEWMAC
()
Date: April 17, 2018 02:46PM
Why is he out of prison?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
eesh was never in prison
()
Date: April 18, 2018 12:02AM
Misery's boyfriend lizzie DID go to prison.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Sent to the emergency room
()
Date: November 13, 2019 10:48AM
Cuck Moreno got viciously assaulted by Lizzie
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
10 stitches!
()
Date: November 14, 2019 06:08AM
God bless lizzie!
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Nikowjite
()
Date: February 18, 2021 08:48PM
.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Madness of the Morenos
()
Date: February 18, 2021 09:37PM
A short list of some of the misdeeds committed by William Moreno, his family, accomplices, and lawyers. Moreno has attempted to portray himself as a "victim" while he himself is guilty of the same and much more.
- William Moreno was banned from Fairfax Underground because he refused to abide by the rules, but he continues to post in violation of state and federal law.
- The Morenos filed an invalid civil lawsuit in which William was not legally allowed to be a plaintiff because his assets were in an OBRA trust.
- The Morenos coerced and manipulated Megan, a young single mother, into pursuing a questionable revenge porn case at her own time and expense in order to advance their own civil suit. When her case failed, the Morenos kicked her to the curb with no compensation for her travel expenses or time lost from her family or work.
- The entire Moreno family stalked the defendant in Megan’s case (Basl) by making a 230 mile road trip with a newspaper reporter in tow to attend the trial. They sat as spectators in the courtroom intending that their presence would intimidate the defendant who was acting as his own defense attorney, causing him to lose focus and throw off his concentration.
- The Morenos introduced the same revenge porn image of the woman as evidence in their own civil case without her permission and against her direct request. Moreno had previously obtained access to the woman’s social media accounts with the promise he would not disseminate any nude images.
- When later confronted by the woman, the Morenos’ lawyers lied and told her they did not know who was depicted in the photo.
- William Moreno attacked his own father with a kitchen knife and was charged with Felony Assault. While in jail for the attack, William wrote in a letter that he “always thought it was kinda normal” to attack a parent.
- William Moreno made multiple graphic death threats against Basl and was arrested. Moreno identified Basl by name, and signed the graphic threats with his own acknowledged pen name “Frank Krow.”
- The Morenos violated the non-disclosure agreement they signed in order to obtain forensic evidence. They violated the confidentiality stipulation and posted the forensic report on Fairfax Underground.
- The Morenos violated the signed non-disclosure agreement by using parts of the report to make false allegations about child porn to the police.
- The Morenos conspired to obtain money by false pretenses by sending fraudulent legal bills someone who was under no obligation to pay. (Violation of Code of Virginia section 18.2-178).
- The Moreno’s attorneys violated Virginia State Bar Professional Guidelines Rule 1.8(f) which prohibit “accepting compensation for representing a client from one other than the client.”
- The Morenos stalked a young woman and lurked outside her house for over an hour, refusing to leave. They were caught in the act by security cameras.
- The Morenos called a probation officer and made false accusations of drug use against the woman who spurned William.
- The Morenos lied when making sworn statements on police reports about the identity of a prank phone caller.
- William Moreno harassed and posted a defamatory cartoon of a Magistrate, identifying him by name.
- The Morenos attempted to blackmail an underage boy into testifying on their behalf, threatening him and his mother with criminal prosecution if they did not cooperate in their civil suit.
- The Morenos’ attorney called the underage boy an attempt to elicit his witness testimony, and provided legal advice in violation of Virginia State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct.
- The Morenos stalked Basl on several occasions and trespassed on his property, even taking selfies in his backyard.
- William Moreno shared an apartment with fellow pedophile Christopher J. Tator, a twice-convicted felon sex offender and shielded the roommate from providing his address to the Sex Offender Registry as required by law.
- The Morenos intimidated multiple witnesses who testified in hearings by harassing and defaming them online. William then bragged about his success from his own registered username. This was in violation of Code of Virginia section18.2-460.
- During an altercation with his female roommate, William told the police she had a gun in an attempt to cause her to be shot by the SWAT team. Moreno was fully away she only had a BB gun.
- William Moreno’s roommate and accomplice Christopher J. Tator, a convicted sex offender, pled guilty to child pornography charge
- William Moreno illegally used Basl’s Social Security number in an attempt to obtain private financial data. (Violation of Code of Virginia section 18.2-186.3, 18.2-152.5, and/or 18.2-152.5:1, a Class 6 Felony). He then disseminated the illegally-obtained results in an attempt to harass. (Violations of Code of Virginia 18.2-152.7:1 and section 18.2-186.4.)
- The Morenos created harassing pornographic collages with other people's faces, including young girls and a baby. The Morenos have committed hundreds of violations against multiple individuals of Code of Virginia section 18.2-152.7:1 Harassment by Computer and section 18.2-186.4. Use of a person's identity with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass.
- William Moreno continues to harass and defame another female who refused to assist in his case and has continued to disseminate revenge porn hundreds of times from 2016 to the present. (Violations of Code of Virginia section 18.2-386.2)
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
William Moreno is a Pedophile
()
Date: February 18, 2021 09:38PM
William Moreno Arrest Record
William Robert Moreno
Moreno, William Robert
aliases: Frank Krow, Frank_Krow, Mr. Misery, Miz, jimmylegs, Voodooslut
known associates: Christopher James Tator, Chris Tator, Tator Tots
https://wtvr.com/2015/07/25/richmond-man-at-the-center-of-a-reign-of-terror-cyber-bulling-lawsuit/
William Moreno aka Mr. Misery aka Miz aka Frank Krow is a pedophile. There weren't just one or two posts, but enough to establish a clear and solid pattern. William Moreno also lived with a twice-convicted child molester named Christopher J, Tator, who he helped to evade the sex offender registry requirements. Chris Tator is now back in federal prison.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/619156/626553.html#msg-626553
William Robert Moreno
Moreno, William Robert
aliases: Frank Krow, Frank_Krow, Mr. Misery, Miz, jimmylegs, Voodooslut
known associates: Christopher James Tator, Chris Tator, Tator Tots
https://wtvr.com/2015/07/25/richmond-man-at-the-center-of-a-reign-of-terror-cyber-bulling-lawsuit/
William Moreno aka Mr. Misery aka Miz aka Frank Krow is a pedophile. There weren't just one or two posts, but enough to establish a clear and solid pattern. William Moreno also lived with a twice-convicted child molester named Christopher J, Tator, who he helped to evade the sex offender registry requirements. Chris Tator is now back in federal prison.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/621151/621429.html#msg-621429Quote
William Robert Moreno
some children are very fuckable, let's face it
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/656161/656214.html#msg-656214Quote
William Robert Moreno
I just fucked a baby in its tight little asshole. And he loved every minute of it.
allegedly.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/636834.html#msg-636834Quote
William Robert Moreno
I'm about to fuck a baby in his soft spot.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/636852.html#msg-636852Quote
William Robert Moreno
what, you don't wanna help me fuck this baby? we could do double penetration on this toddler bitch. one in each hole. lookit this little slut. she's just beggin' for it. watta fuckin whore.
suck mah dick bee-yotch.....
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/636766.html#msg-636766Quote
William Robert Moreno
one time, I was fucking this baby up the ass, it was crying so I started shaking it. It stopped crying, I came inside it, put it back in its crib, then climbed out the window. I wonder what ever happened to that baby.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/636769.html#msg-636769Quote
William Robert Moreno
I ate out a toddler's asshole tonight.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/632214.html#msg-632214Quote
William Robert Moreno
hamtaro, wanna help me fuck this baby?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/621151/625583.html#msg-625583Quote
William Robert Moreno
I raped a baby
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/632140/633879.html#msg-633879Quote
William Robert Moreno
just got done fucking this baby......man was he sweet. I gave him a reach-around in his sweet little soft spot. It was soooooooooooooooo hot.
we watched Zooballee Zoo after I finished.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/619156/625479.html#msg-625479Quote
William Robert Moreno
I just fucked a baby...it was consensual
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/619156/626553.html#msg-626553
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/506690/506705.html#msg-506705Quote
William Robert Moreno
I wish I could have a baby.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/484700/648453.html#msg-648453Quote
William Robert Moreno
by the way, I just got done getting a blowjob from a 3 month-old, so I'm all tuckered out........see you guise tomaorrow.
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/637654/637753.html#msg-637753Quote
William Robert Moreno
I don't care if they are underage, I'll still fuck 'em. I'll rape all their highschool boy asses, one by one. I'll cum in each and every one of their gay boy asses, then we'll see who's gay. ... I'll tell ya that much, muchacho!!! I'LL BUTTFUCK EVERY ONE OF YA! 15, 16, 17, DOESN'T MATTER! I'LL ASS-RAPE YOU! I'M A FUCKING MAD MAN! I'LL FUCK ANYTHING THAT MOVES! ASK ANYONE ROUND HERE!
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777495/777618.html#msg-777618Quote
William Robert Moreno
like, can you get in trouble in any way for just buying a copy of Tiger Beat? If you were a grown man let's say, and you were slightly overweight and had a beard and large glasses and you look a little funny, and you just went into a Walgreens and bought nothing but a copy of Tiger Beat....and maybe also a box of condoms. Could you get arrested based solely on your purchase? Is that probable cause or something? Or if you bought a Kidz Bop CD. Anything like that. If a grown man bought something of that sort, and he looked a little ugly and odd maybe, could he hypothetically get arrested for that?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777495/777624.html#msg-777624Quote
William Robert Moreno
is it illegal for a grown man to attempt to have a serious conversation with a kindergarten child about politics or religion, if they are not related and just happen to be sitting next to each other on a park bench or something? Is it really illegal?
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/777495/777625.html#msg-777625Quote
William Robert Moreno
can a grown man and a little girl, unrelated and strangers to each other, have dinner together at a fancy restaurant? Legally? Let's say they meet outside the gym or something and decide to have dinner together, and that's it. That is the extent of the interaction. Is it illegal?
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Get
()
Date: May 29, 2021 07:24PM
America
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
KeepTryin
()
Date: May 29, 2021 08:25PM
I wouldn’t post anything.
Fairfaxunderground.victims on Instagram
Looks good.
Fairfaxunderground.victims on Instagram
Looks good.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
MNHWL
()
Date: May 30, 2021 06:57PM
Why is this BS over on this side. Post that stupid shit on the off topic troll board.
Re: Proceedings in the Case of Misery v. Eesh
Posted by:
Basl is back stalking again
()
Date: January 02, 2022 08:22PM
MNHWL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why is this BS over on this side. Post that
> stupid shit on the off topic troll board.
Because it's never stopped
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why is this BS over on this side. Post that
> stupid shit on the off topic troll board.
Because it's never stopped
Attachments:
Holy Herpes Batman!!! You put razor blades in Eesh's dildo? That's some sick ass shit. I think sticking a M80 inside would have been funnier though. It would also help him with his weight loss. It would be community service.44
Posted by:
The Boy Wonder
()
Date: December 29, 2023 11:53AM
Is that Smurf cum running down the fat little pigs chinny chin chin?