Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Derfx
()
Date: November 11, 2014 03:40PM
Who is better on the radio with Chad Dukes? Smooty or Lavar?
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Darrell Green
()
Date: November 11, 2014 03:48PM
Smoot. Hands down.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
larsensus
()
Date: November 11, 2014 04:37PM
I heard about 2 minutes while driving home today and then I turned the station; Smoot said "let me ax you a question" to Randy Wittman and then he started another question with , " You was.....
I'm at the point now where I just turn the channel or turn it off when I hear these niggers and their ebonics.
I'm at the point now where I just turn the channel or turn it off when I hear these niggers and their ebonics.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Al Ameriki
()
Date: November 11, 2014 04:54PM
Smoot is more entertaining but extremely hard to understand unless you've taken Ebonis 101.
Arrington talks like a white guy. Cornball brother.
Arrington talks like a white guy. Cornball brother.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Priapus
()
Date: November 11, 2014 05:29PM
Smoot sounds like any other good ol' boy from down South. Listen to the early Andy Griffith album, "What It Was, Was Football".
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Shawshank
()
Date: November 11, 2014 05:32PM
I am beginning to believe that WJFK is programming towards a very specific demographic...something along the lines of males 18-30...high school, maybe a little college, education...blue collar job. Nothing wrong with that, but when you insist on putting people on the air like LaVar and Smoot, along with the rest of the on-air talent, you can't be serious about trying to attract a more affluent and educated audience.
The best case in point is Sunday morning...while they used to have John Kincade doing an intelligent sports program with good insignt, you get a half-assed producer along with random unlistenable characters.
Not that ESPN980 is much better, but aside from Rick "Doc" Walker most of the talent is pretty good.
The best case in point is Sunday morning...while they used to have John Kincade doing an intelligent sports program with good insignt, you get a half-assed producer along with random unlistenable characters.
Not that ESPN980 is much better, but aside from Rick "Doc" Walker most of the talent is pretty good.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
iPod Bob
()
Date: November 11, 2014 06:35PM
Shawshank Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am beginning to believe that WJFK is programming
> towards a very specific demographic...something
> along the lines of males 18-30...high school,
> maybe a little college, education...blue collar
> job.
Not to mention those ass hats known as the Sports Junkies. I have tried a couple of times to try to make it thru 15-20 minutes of their show and it's impossible. They have to be targeting high school and early 20's audience because their schtick is weak sauce, annoyingly repetitive, and just plain ignorant. And Im only 30!
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am beginning to believe that WJFK is programming
> towards a very specific demographic...something
> along the lines of males 18-30...high school,
> maybe a little college, education...blue collar
> job.
Not to mention those ass hats known as the Sports Junkies. I have tried a couple of times to try to make it thru 15-20 minutes of their show and it's impossible. They have to be targeting high school and early 20's audience because their schtick is weak sauce, annoyingly repetitive, and just plain ignorant. And Im only 30!
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Huh???
()
Date: November 11, 2014 07:21PM
Wait...what happened to "Chad Dukes Against the World"? I thought he was "big time" enough that he could carry a show solo for 4 hours...oh wait...apparently...he CAN'T!
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Buckwheaties
()
Date: November 11, 2014 07:53PM
Smoot talks like Buckwheat. Doh!
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
raval
()
Date: November 12, 2014 12:44PM
Every time Lavar speaks, it sounds like he just woke up and is still laying in bed. It's hard to listen to.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Mike's Diverticular Colon
()
Date: November 12, 2014 07:29PM
Who is this "Cow Shanahan" that LaVar keeps talking about?
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
JxXK7
()
Date: November 12, 2014 07:36PM
Mike's Diverticular Colon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who is this "Cow Shanahan" that LaVar keeps
> talking about?
Probaly just some afalete. Ask Frad.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who is this "Cow Shanahan" that LaVar keeps
> talking about?
Probaly just some afalete. Ask Frad.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Spellcheck
()
Date: November 14, 2014 08:44PM
JxXK7 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mike's Diverticular Colon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Who is this "Cow Shanahan" that LaVar keeps
> > talking about?
>
> Probaly just some afalete. Ask Frad.
You idiot. It's aks.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mike's Diverticular Colon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Who is this "Cow Shanahan" that LaVar keeps
> > talking about?
>
> Probaly just some afalete. Ask Frad.
You idiot. It's aks.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
lemme axe you dis
()
Date: November 15, 2014 07:23AM
Shawshank Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am beginning to believe that WJFK is programming
> towards a very specific demographic...something
> along the lines of males 18-30...high school,
> maybe a little college, education...blue collar
> job. Nothing wrong with that, but when you insist
> on putting people on the air like LaVar and Smoot,
> along with the rest of the on-air talent, you
> can't be serious about trying to attract a more
> affluent and educated audience.
>
> The best case in point is Sunday morning...while
> they used to have John Kincade doing an
> intelligent sports program with good insignt, you
> get a half-assed producer along with random
> unlistenable characters.
>
> Not that ESPN980 is much better, but aside from
> Rick "Doc" Walker most of the talent is pretty
> good.
"Affluent and educated audience"? Its a fucking sports show talking about a bunch of blacks catchin da ball.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am beginning to believe that WJFK is programming
> towards a very specific demographic...something
> along the lines of males 18-30...high school,
> maybe a little college, education...blue collar
> job. Nothing wrong with that, but when you insist
> on putting people on the air like LaVar and Smoot,
> along with the rest of the on-air talent, you
> can't be serious about trying to attract a more
> affluent and educated audience.
>
> The best case in point is Sunday morning...while
> they used to have John Kincade doing an
> intelligent sports program with good insignt, you
> get a half-assed producer along with random
> unlistenable characters.
>
> Not that ESPN980 is much better, but aside from
> Rick "Doc" Walker most of the talent is pretty
> good.
"Affluent and educated audience"? Its a fucking sports show talking about a bunch of blacks catchin da ball.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Who cares
()
Date: November 16, 2014 02:25AM
Who cares? They were both shitty football players.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
who?
()
Date: November 16, 2014 07:20AM
Dildo, whore, boat party.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
106.7 programming
()
Date: November 16, 2014 09:08AM
Are you serious? Andy Griffith is easy to understand.......Smoot is full blown ebonics, with a southern accent.
Arrington takes 10 minutes to answer a question and just rambles on, going in circles and saying absolutely nothing. He's trying to sound intelligent but it doesn't work.
Arrington takes 10 minutes to answer a question and just rambles on, going in circles and saying absolutely nothing. He's trying to sound intelligent but it doesn't work.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Mrs Smoot
()
Date: November 16, 2014 09:13AM
I have to give this Dukes guy credit for sitting there, apparently with a straight face, and listening to these dumb niggers butcher the English language.
How does he hear the word "ask" pronounced as "ax", and not think to himself, "what the fuck am I doing here"?
How does he hear the word "ask" pronounced as "ax", and not think to himself, "what the fuck am I doing here"?
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Butthurt
()
Date: November 28, 2014 02:45AM
I think you guys are just jealous that a darkie makes more money than you.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Priapus
()
Date: November 28, 2014 07:46AM
106.7 programming Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are you serious? Andy Griffith is easy to
> understand.......Smoot is full blown ebonics, with
> a southern accent.
> Arrington takes 10 minutes to answer a question
> and just rambles on, going in circles and saying
> absolutely nothing. He's trying to sound
> intelligent but it doesn't work.
oh yeah?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xus57BaY3hI
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are you serious? Andy Griffith is easy to
> understand.......Smoot is full blown ebonics, with
> a southern accent.
> Arrington takes 10 minutes to answer a question
> and just rambles on, going in circles and saying
> absolutely nothing. He's trying to sound
> intelligent but it doesn't work.
oh yeah?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xus57BaY3hI
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
Whitey Willy
()
Date: November 28, 2014 08:36AM
Butthurt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you guys are just jealous that a darkie
> makes more money than you.
At least we don't beat our women like Smoot.
http://www.insidenova.com/news/loudoun/former-redskin-fred-smoot-faces-domestic-assault-charge/article_59feefc6-ca13-5124-a8fa-53a8de9ffaad.html
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you guys are just jealous that a darkie
> makes more money than you.
At least we don't beat our women like Smoot.
http://www.insidenova.com/news/loudoun/former-redskin-fred-smoot-faces-domestic-assault-charge/article_59feefc6-ca13-5124-a8fa-53a8de9ffaad.html
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
these people are incredible
()
Date: November 28, 2014 08:44AM
Keep the line moving......hire a nigger; he gets arrested; bring another one in........same thing with NFL network. The white lineup stays the same but the niggers rotate in.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
GgPerspective
()
Date: November 28, 2014 11:29AM
Whitey Willy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think you guys are just jealous that a darkie
> > makes more money than you.
>
>
> At least we don't beat our women like Smoot.
>
> http://www.insidenova.com/news/loudoun/former-reds
> kin-fred-smoot-faces-domestic-assault-charge/artic
> le_59feefc6-ca13-5124-a8fa-53a8de9ffaad.html
Yeah we don't have any domestic violence in our race.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Butthurt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think you guys are just jealous that a darkie
> > makes more money than you.
>
>
> At least we don't beat our women like Smoot.
>
> http://www.insidenova.com/news/loudoun/former-reds
> kin-fred-smoot-faces-domestic-assault-charge/artic
> le_59feefc6-ca13-5124-a8fa-53a8de9ffaad.html
Yeah we don't have any domestic violence in our race.
Re: Smoot better than Lavar?
Posted by:
A-DCProf
()
Date: November 28, 2014 07:12PM
They are both absolutely horrible. LaVar with his stuttering-John impression...Jesus, get your thought out! Smoot with his less-than-average grasp of the English language.
And BTW...Chad Dukes is a sniveling, whining ass-face himself. Who the fuck made him relevant...he's freaking awful!
Kevin and Rock...don't know where they are these days, but they should have a late morning or afternoon slot after the Junkies...those guys were great.
And BTW...Chad Dukes is a sniveling, whining ass-face himself. Who the fuck made him relevant...he's freaking awful!
Kevin and Rock...don't know where they are these days, but they should have a late morning or afternoon slot after the Junkies...those guys were great.