BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WTHolyF Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I'll never understand the libtard mentality
> that
> >
> > > claims that the poor assholes who might vote
> for
> >
> > > the Democrat candidate (i.e., the classic
> > libtard
> > > candidate) cannot afford to get a simple
> photo
> > id.
> >
> > I'm sure there are a great number of things
> that
> > you will never understand. Meanwhile, one of
> the
> > things that you SHOULD understand is that
> voter-id
> > laws have NOTHING AT ALL to do with preserving
> the
> > sanctity of our democracy. The only form of
> > vote-fraud that these laws can possibly combat
> is
> > voter-impersonation fraud, and that's the LEAST
> > frequently found form. There simply is no
> problem
> > here for voter-id laws to resolve. Behind the
> > phony cover story, their one and only intent is
> to
> > make it less likely that affected groups will
> > actually make it to the polls. That's the ONLY
> > purpose of these laws. Not coincidentally, the
> > affected groups have traditionally tended to
> vote
> > Democratic. This is why voter-id laws are all
> but
> > exclusively pushed by Republicans. Such laws
> have
> > in fact become a staple of the right-wing
> gospel
> > these days, thanks in large part to hard-right
> > groups like ALEC and meddling corporate
> extremists
> > such as the Koch brothers.
>
> This is simply not true.
When you put it that way. Ok. I trust now. Sorry for the confusion.
Link with video of republican politician, unrelated.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/mike-turzai-voter-id_n_1625646.html