I thinks it's possible. We just need canidates who connect with the people and understand all the latest gadgets (iPhones, iPads) and social media sites (eBay, aol instant messenger)



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/18/2014 11:23AM by Fox News.

Not unless you get rid of all the wetbacks.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thinks it's possible. We just need canidates who
> connect with the people and understand all the
> latest gadgets (iPhones, iPads) and social media
> sites (eBay, aol instant messenger)

Don't forget Myspace.

And I don't think that's even remotely possible unless there's a serious cut or relocation of government or government contracted jobs around here. And then Fairfax would turn into a shithole. It's like the one thing that's keeping us from going full shithole at this point.

What if we got someone like Regan?

eat shit and die Repukes, Don't worry about Fairfax, post 2020 America will be gone for you rat bastards.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eat shit and die Repukes, Don't worry about
> Fairfax, post 2020 America will be gone for you
> rat bastards.


But I thought I could keep my doctor if I liked him. President Obama personaly promised me that!

And I thought you could come up with an original thought and not be an idiotic parrot of dumb meaningless one liners. Actually, I never thought that.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thinks it's possible. We just need canidates who
> connect with the people and understand all the
> latest gadgets (iPhones, iPads) and social media
> sites (eBay, aol instant messenger)


the repub party will not exist after Hillary runs the country for 8 years

the split now will fester and a rebrand will happen under different names

this will ensure no "repub" under any of the new names id potus for at least another 24 years

during this time a third party will appear and the dems + new 3rd party will forever run the country

the repubs are just too far out of touch with modern day reality and the people that accept this hate and obstruct bullshit will be dying off in the millions

this country will move to green everything and close the population economic gaps of today - also introducing alternatives to antiquated firearms that are non-lethal will end our criminal rates and activities - add that marijuana and prostitution will be regulated and legal, which will end our constant debt

once the country is free of the repub cancer the country will prosper like no other time

there will be conservatives, but modern thinking ones that actually work for the people and erase the childish ways of todays right

the only good part for todays repubs is that they will be dead by then - the best part for everyone else is they will live their golden years under the rule of a woman - only thing better is if her vp is black or Hispanic

I hope you're not white.

As long as the Dems can keep delivering freebies to illegals and leeches, they'll keep attracting more scum to Fairfax and retain a majority. Just think - dems are buying votes with YOUR money!

Gerrymander, the cocksucking liberal is back! Hey fuck face, hope you get ebola!

But as to whether Fairfax will always be Democratic... Does the Tin Man have a sheet metal cock?

The government employees tens of thousands of Gerrymanders in Fairfax.

Not Likely Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As long as the Dems can keep delivering freebies
> to illegals and leeches, they'll keep attracting
> more scum to Fairfax and retain a majority. Just
> think - dems are buying votes with YOUR money!

Illegals can't vote, you moron.

Oh Jeez... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not Likely Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As long as the Dems can keep delivering
> freebies
> > to illegals and leeches, they'll keep
> attracting
> > more scum to Fairfax and retain a majority.
> Just
> > think - dems are buying votes with YOUR money!
>
> Illegals can't vote, you moron.


They can vote and they do vote. They steal the identities of dead people and old people.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if we got someone like Regan?

I don't think there'll ever be another Reagan. I don't ever think Democrats will ever have another Clinton (the real one, not the ice cold bitch one), either. The time for good leaders is over.

Prozactly Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fox News Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What if we got someone like Regan?
>
> I don't think there'll ever be another Reagan. I
> don't ever think Democrats will ever have another
> Clinton (the real one, not the ice cold bitch
> one), either. The time for good leaders is over.


Are you calling Bill Clinton (the real first black president) a good leader?

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But I thought I could keep my doctor if I liked
> him. President Obama personaly promised me that!

Did ISIS come and take your doctor away? That's awful!

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if we got someone like Regan?

At least Reagan could spell Reagan. After that, he wasn't good for much.

Not Likely Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As long as the Dems can keep delivering freebies
> to illegals and leeches, they'll keep attracting
> more scum to Fairfax and retain a majority. Just
> think - dems are buying votes with YOUR money!

Well, they certainly didn't spend it on educating you!

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They can vote and they do vote. They steal the
> identities of dead people and old people.

Illegals try to stay as far below the radar as possible. They limit contact with "the system" to the what is absolutely, positively necessary. They don't go the the ER unless it's an actual emergency. They don';t file for tax refunds. They don't call police or fire when they should. Why given the risks would they try to register or vote just so they could cast a ballot for people who are going to win easily anyway?

The yahoos, hicks, goobers, and hayseeds of fifty years ago have been pushed out and replaced by the folks who make this one of the most highly educated areas in the country. Does that answer the question for you?

The dumb just doesn't end Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fox News Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > They can vote and they do vote. They steal the
> > identities of dead people and old people.
>
> Illegals try to stay as far below the radar as
> possible. They limit contact with "the system" to
> the what is absolutely, positively necessary.
> They don't go the the ER unless it's an actual
> emergency. They don';t file for tax refunds.
> They don't call police or fire when they should.
> Why given the risks would they try to register or
> vote just so they could cast a ballot for people
> who are going to win easily anyway?


the goppussies do not understand reality

they believe illegals would risk being deported to vote!?!

FUCKING HILARIOUS!

N9Ndt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The dumb just doesn't end Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fox News Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > They can vote and they do vote. They steal
> the
> > > identities of dead people and old people.
> >
> > Illegals try to stay as far below the radar as
> > possible. They limit contact with "the system"
> to
> > the what is absolutely, positively necessary.
> > They don't go the the ER unless it's an actual
> > emergency. They don';t file for tax refunds.
> > They don't call police or fire when they should.
>
> > Why given the risks would they try to register
> or
> > vote just so they could cast a ballot for
> people
> > who are going to win easily anyway?
>
>
> the goppussies do not understand reality
>
> they believe illegals would risk being deported to
> vote!?!
>
> FUCKING HILARIOUS!


Are you fucking kidding, illegal risk voting in fear of deportation? You are truly retarded. The part of your brain with any intelligence ran down the crack of your Mommy's ass. Illegals will go get welfare, commit crimes and never get deported. Voting? Of course they will fucking vote. It isn't like anyone is trying to catch them...

Go fuck yourself you retard.

Ever. History > op.

Dumb fuck... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Voting? Of course they will fucking vote. It
> isn't like anyone is trying to catch them...


this poster thinks illegals vote - ROFLMAO

yes, they study the candidates before they arrive and before they even get a job they register to vote, of course all illegals have a job that will allow them to leave for hours to vote during a weekday

Let me finish your ignorant ass off for good here - PEOPLE BORN AND RAISED IN THIS COUNTRY BARELY VOTE

/thread

Do you have any backing for your assertion?

N9Ndt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The dumb just doesn't end Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fox News Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > They can vote and they do vote. They steal
> the
> > > identities of dead people and old people.
> >
> > Illegals try to stay as far below the radar as
> > possible. They limit contact with "the system"
> to
> > the what is absolutely, positively necessary.
> > They don't go the the ER unless it's an actual
> > emergency. They don';t file for tax refunds.
> > They don't call police or fire when they should.
>
> > Why given the risks would they try to register
> or
> > vote just so they could cast a ballot for
> people
> > who are going to win easily anyway?
>
>
> the goppussies do not understand reality
>
> they believe illegals would risk being deported to
> vote!?!
>
> FUCKING HILARIOUS!


Published September 20, 2012Associated Press
DES MOINES, Iowa – The Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation says three Council Bluffs residents have been charged with election misconduct.

Two Canadian nationals and a Mexican national were booked into the Pottawattamie County jail. The felony charges allege they registered to vote in Iowa and voted in at least one election.

The arrests followed an investigations by an Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation agent who was assigned to work with Secretary of State Matt Schultz to root out voter fraud

Charged are 52-year-old Albert Harte-Maxwell, 49-year-old Linda Harte-Maxwell, and 40-year-old Maria Ayon-Fernandez, all of Council Bluffs.

A criminal complaint says Albert Harte-Maxwell voted in the 2010 general election and 2011 city election and Linda Harte-Maxwell voted in the 2011 city election. Maria Ayon-Fernandez voted in the 2010 general election.

They have exactly the same opportunity as they did when Jimmy Carter was president. The death of Republicans after Nixon was predicted by much smarter people than Gerry.

Fairfax County IS still Republican. It just has become ill with the Liberal disease. There's a vaccine and it's called voting.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if we got someone like Regan?


reagan was an awful president. try lincoln....

lol, you can bitch and cry all the way into irrelevancy. The fact is you're dying and we're multiplying. Buh bye motherfuckers. Good riddance.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol, you can bitch and cry all the way into
> irrelevancy. The fact is you're dying and we're
> multiplying. Buh bye motherfuckers. Good
> riddance.

Multiplying like the disease ridden vermin that you are.

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lol, you can bitch and cry all the way into
> irrelevancy. The fact is you're dying and we're
> multiplying. Buh bye motherfuckers. Good
> riddance.


We're? You're an overweight white guy in your mid-late 30s. lmao

Ol Gerry has got a severe case of white guilt disease. The only cure is a bullet to the head, much like the brsinsead zombie he is.

Hey Gerrymander, you ignorant cocksucking liberal and whoever the other dumb fuck is who say that illegals don't vote... Funny about your assertion. They fucking Washington Post, your fucking paper just published an article today about this...

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Illegal won't vote my ass... they need to vote for politicians who promise amnesty and EBT cards like you get you fucks...

And Democrats know this and that is why they oppose ID to vote... not that that would matter I guess because what illegal doesn't have an ID in states like California?

Gerrymander... enjoy the nice brown shit hole world America when white guys are gone... The brownies have done so well in Central America...

You sound like a rambling retard. Please take your meds or another shot of rye and chill the fuck out.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thinks it's possible. We just need canidates who
> connect with the people and understand all the
> latest gadgets (iPhones, iPads) and social media
> sites (eBay, aol instant messenger)


God I hope not.

Read your on WAPO Libfuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Gerrymander, you ignorant cocksucking liberal
> and whoever the other dumb fuck is who say that
> illegals don't vote... Funny about your assertion.
> They fucking Washington Post, your fucking paper
> just published an article today about this...
>
> How many non-citizens participate in U.S.
> elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in
> both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they
> were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of
> these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based
> upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample
> with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of
> non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of
> non-citizens voted in 2010.
>
> Illegal won't vote my ass... they need to vote for
> politicians who promise amnesty and EBT cards like
> you get you fucks...
>
> And Democrats know this and that is why they
> oppose ID to vote... not that that would matter I
> guess because what illegal doesn't have an ID in
> states like California?
>
> Gerrymander... enjoy the nice brown shit hole
> world America when white guys are gone... The
> brownies have done so well in Central America...


Great link, oh wait. Let me guess its an opEd from some dumb fuck GOPper. Thats how you guys build legitimacy because you know breitbart is laughed at. You get some bullshit opEd in the Wapo or NYT then you troll on how look even blah blah says this. No, the editorial says that without proper fact checking you dumb fuck.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election/

Not the vulgar poster above. But, here you go.

Not massive--but enough to sway elections.

link Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp
> /2014/10/24/could-non-citizens-decide-the-november
> -election/
>
> Not the vulgar poster above. But, here you go.
>
> Not massive--but enough to sway elections.


You see that part after washingtonpost.com where it says category blogs? you fuckin tool?

THAT MEANS IT HAS NO FACT CHECKING. ITS SOME DOUCHE GOP WHO HAS HIS BLOG AND IS POSTING HIS THOUGHTS

Jesus fuckin christ you rednecks are so fuckin predictable. No dumb ass, 6% of people voting are not illegal you dumb cunt. Just die already.

Richman, one of the bloggers who wrote the "fact driven article on the WaPo haha"

Via some google searches
Richman examines the impact of the neo-liberal agenda on the United States and conclude that selective protection of the domestic market must be enacted quickly.


Oh yea, yer right this guy is unbiased.

proof = pudding Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Richman, one of the bloggers who wrote the "fact
> driven article on the WaPo haha"
>
> Via some google searches
> Richman examines the impact of the neo-liberal
> agenda on the United States and conclude that
> selective protection of the domestic market must
> be enacted quickly.
>
>
> Oh yea, yer right this guy is unbiased.


lol. Mostly it shows your own selective bias and lack of reading beyond finding something that said what you wanted it to say in order for you to write him off as a neo-con.

Quote

Richman examines the impact of the neo-liberal agenda on the United States and concludes that selective protection of the domestic market must be enacted quickly. Their review of the “hollowing out” and deindustrialization of the American economy has been told many times: outsourcing, off-shoring, stagnating real wages, growing disparity in the distribution of income and wealth, increasing dependency on foreign savings, and rising tension among the economic, social, and political institutions. The unintended economic, social, and political consequences of the neo-liberal agenda on the United States can no longer be ignored. The time for change is at hand. In particular, Richman advocates the immediate adoption of a set of public policy proposal designed to reduce the trade deficit and increase domestic savings. To reduce the trade deficit the United Sates must (1) restore the withholding tax on foreign financial investments, (2) impose import certificates on nations practicing “dollar mercantilism,” (3) tax foreign dollar reserves, and (4) accumulate a reserve of foreign currencies. To increase domestic savings the United States must (1) tax capital gains that are used for consumption, (2) enact a nation-wide Proposition 13 real estate tax with a homestead exemption, and (3) replace the corporate and personal income taxes with a true consumption tax, for example the Fair Tax advocated by Boortz and Linder. (Boortz and Linder 2005)

Sounds like a real free-market conservative huh? lmao

The Post link is to a blog where they have various people write articles regarding political subjects along the lines of the Post's "Wonk Blog."

In this case, it's reporting the results of a published research article.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973

The authors are professors at at ODU. I don't see any particular obvious political bias from a quick look at their published work. In fact, they seem to jump around quite a bit as far as what would be assigned to which political party based on FFXU politi-tard dogma.

Quote

Jesse Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center.

David Earnest is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters.

Read your on WAPO Libfuck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Gerrymander, you ignorant cocksucking liberal
> and whoever the other dumb fuck is who say that
> illegals don't vote... Funny about your assertion.
> They fucking Washington Post, your fucking paper
> just published an article today about this...
>
> How many non-citizens participate in U.S.
> elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in
> both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they
> were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of
> these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based
> upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample
> with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of
> non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of
> non-citizens voted in 2010.
>
> Illegal won't vote my ass... they need to vote for
> politicians who promise amnesty and EBT cards like
> you get you fucks...
>
> And Democrats know this and that is why they
> oppose ID to vote... not that that would matter I
> guess because what illegal doesn't have an ID in
> states like California?
>
> Gerrymander... enjoy the nice brown shit hole
> world America when white guys are gone... The
> brownies have done so well in Central America...

Are you deliberately being disingenous or are you truly this weak minded? You (purposefully) mix references to illegals and non-U.S. citizens (permanent residents) as if they are one and the same. They clearly are not.

In many states (18 USC 611: Voting by aliens,http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611) permanent residents ARE allowed to vote in state and local elections. They cannot, however, vote in Federal ones. Illegal residents cannot vote in any type of election. To do so is a felony, resulting in jail time, then deportation.

If permanent residents are voting in Federal elections in jurisdictions where they can vote in local ones, the fault lies with the local elections Registrar, who is obviously doing a poor job in distinguishing between the voter types on the rolls, and in educating permanent residents who register to vote as to their rights and restrictions.

Unless the local Registrar (don't lots of Republicans seek out this position?) is corrupt or incompetent, Illegals shouldn't be able to register at all. If many are in fact voting, as Republicans repeatly claim, this would indicate either corruption on the part of local poll workers of both parties, or that many Illegals are going to the polls with purloined identities, usually from dead people (which seems to be the preferred explanation on the Right).

The checks and balances in place at the polls should dampen the former, and the unlikely scenarios in the latter would make it equally improbable as well. Consider: unless an area has a long standing community of, let's arbitrarily say hispanics, there won't be many identities to steal that match the illegal's ethnicity. In a polling place, part of a local community where voters have some knowledge of one another, their neighbors, it would probably raise a few red flags if a twenty-two year old hispanic male with an extremely limited knowledge of English presented himself as "Donald Miller", especially if one of poll workers knew of the deceased (polls are, after all, local). The risk is simply too great for someone not wanting to draw attention.

Just hurl invectives.

Got it, butthurt.

I think Chris Cristy (nj) could turn everything around

link? oh wait you didnt link Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great link, oh wait. Let me guess its an opEd from
> some dumb fuck GOPper. Thats how you guys build
> legitimacy because you know breitbart is laughed
> at. You get some bullshit opEd in the Wapo or NYT
> then you troll on how look even blah blah says
> this. No, the editorial says that without proper
> fact checking you dumb fuck.

It isn't so much that the facts used here are untrue, as that they are being deliberately misrepresented. Notice for instance how the authors never say "illegals". They only say "non-citizens" and hope that goobers will misunderstand. Which they of course promptly do -- these are not smart people, after all. Notice as well that the authors only say "vote". They do not indicate what level of elections all this voting is going on in. Again, they hope the goobers will misunderstand, and again of course, they oblige by doing so.

It is illegal at the present time for non-citizens to register or to vote in federal elections. While it was common enough over most of our history, non-citizens have not been able to vote in any state election since Arkansas banned the practice in the mid-1920's. These barriers do not necessarily extend any further however. Non-citizens are in fact entitled to register and vote in many local and municipal jurisdictions around the country. New York City (with 30% of its residents being non-citizens) is looking at plans to join them. There is such a jurisdiction nearby in Takoma Park, MD. If asked whether they registered and voted, these people would honestly answer "Yes" to both questions, their answers implying no law-breaking at all. These are the people being caught and then "extrapolated" from in the partisan blog piece.

It is quite true meanwhile that the New York Times did no fact-checking of this piece at all, and that the opinions expressed in it are those of the authors alone. Well, they may also be the opinions of Red State, Hot Air, Breitbart, NRO, Eagle Rising, Right Wing News, The Daily Caller, and other such Echo Chamber outlets, these comprising pretty much the entire universe of the article's publication outside of The Post.

proof = pudding Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Richman examines the impact of the neo-liberal
> agenda on the United States and conclude that
> selective protection of the domestic market must
> be enacted quickly.

Especially in terms of international trade, the terms neo-con and neo-lib may be all but indistinguishable from each other. Certainly, the two are closer to each other than either is to latter-day conservatism or latter-day liberalism.

HHhVb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't see any particular obvious political bias
> from a quick look at their published work.

You should have, simply from reading the example at hand. It's a deliberately slanted hatchet piece. Their tactics apparently worked on you.

xh6hM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In many states (18 USC 611: Voting by aliens,
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611)
> permanent residents ARE allowed to vote in state
> and local elections.

Excellent post, but these people need not be permanent residents either. They need only be in the country legally. In Takoma Park, many of the non-citizens who register and vote are embassy, IMF, World Bank, or other such employees who are temporarily stationed here. But issues like schools, trash collection, maintenance of parks and rec centers, leaf mulch distribution, and so forth affect them as much as any other resident. It seems silly to exclude their voices en masse.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think Chris Cristy (nj) could turn everything around

Like traffic at the tunnels? And all those pictures of him snuggling up to Obama after Superstorm Sandy? He's toast!

Still stood.

actually confuses nyt with Post, Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still stood.

Are you contending that the NYT in fact DID fact-check this piece? Otherwise, goober asshats are forever trying to get nonsense blog and op-ed work planted in both the Post and the NYT so that they can try to leech credibility for it that is entirely undeserved. I've debunked dozens of examples of this over the years. This was just the latest one, and whichever paper it was that failed to spike the dishonest slop this time, it was still dishonest slop.

Bitch please you know you love to feast on Repub cock and 2020 you will certainly get your fill




Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eat shit and die Repukes, Don't worry about
> Fairfax, post 2020 America will be gone for you
> rat bastards.

Still stupid.
And butthurt.

whaaaa=/= debunked Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still stupid.
> And butthurt.

Pfft!
.
Attachments:

The butthurt.
Why so faggot,bro?u mad?

ooooooh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The butthurt.
> Why so faggot,bro?u mad?

LOL! So fucking lame! Your envy of me lights up the night sky!
.

Actually... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ooooooh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The butthurt.
> > Why so faggot,bro?u mad?
>
> LOL! So fucking lame! Your envy of me lights up
> the night sky!
> .

And butthurt.

Republicans lie, cheat and steal. That is all.

And Prius fags like Gerry suck off the gov't and race bait when they lose the argument.

Lincoln does nor belong in that picture. Try Herbert Hoover.

Psst! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lincoln does nor belong in that picture. Try
> Herbert Hoover.


Lincoln was a Republican

There's truth on both sides here. Illegals and other fraudulent registrations DO vote in significant numbers.....but that vote is not always as pro-Democratic is the commonly-thought image....or what the so-called poll numbers indicate. Many of these people are socially conservative, pro-life, opposed to gay marriage, anti-welfare (witness their hard work doing menial jobs that many Americans simply do not want, and tend to gravitate to like-minded views in the Republican party.

hmm...usually when i see the pics being posted it's the end of the thread...



As it stands right now 3 out of 4 voters are Democrat in Fairfax County. The demographics are quite different but the Democrats really know how to motivate people to get out there on election day.

so

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lincoln was a Republican

Republicans then were not anything like Republicans now. Today's GOP would throw a Lincoln-type guy out in a heartbeat.

Is there even a Lincoln-type candidate that would run on convictions instead of poll-data and fundraising - when was the last person ... I don't know of anyone in the last decade.. that isn't looking out for #1. The all just sit on the fence and ask which way the winds blowin

Sane Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There's truth on both sides here. Illegals and
> other fraudulent registrations DO vote in
> significant numbers...

Fact: Illegals don't register or vote anywhere in any significant numbers. They are too busy trying to fly below the radar. Not sure who these "other fraudulent registrations" of yours are, why you wanted to include them, or where you got any data about them. Sounds like plain old dumbass rubbish to me.

> Many of these people are socially conservative, pro-
> life, opposed to gay marriage, anti-welfare (witness
> their hard work doing menial jobs that many Americans
> simply do not want, and tend to gravitate to like-
> minded views in the Republican party.

2012 Hispanic Vote: Obama 71%, Dumbshit 27%
2012 Asian Vote: Obama 73%, Dumbshit 25%

politically correct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there even a Lincoln-type candidate that would
> run on convictions instead of poll-data and
> fundraising - when was the last person ... I don't
> know of anyone in the last decade.. that isn't
> looking out for #1. The all just sit on the fence
> and ask which way the winds blowin

Who do you think paid for the staging of the Lincoln-Douglas debates? There were nine of them in all. And that was just for a Senate race. Of course, Senators were appointed back then, so the debates were really a fight for a majority in the state legislature that would do the appointing.

so... does that mean you know of someone that is willing to run on convictions, principles, morals, ethics, or anything of that nature?

so.............. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> so... does that mean you know of someone that is
> willing to run on convictions, principles, morals,
> ethics, or anything of that nature?

No. No one has ever run such a campaign. They won't be starting now.

Reminds me of the movie "My Fellow Americans" What a hoot!

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What if we got someone like Regan?


Typical Republican. I assume you're referring to Ronald ReAgan. Damn you Republicans is ignate.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Are you calling Bill Clinton (the real first black
> president) a good leader?


Ok, now I think you must just be trolling. Bill Clinton was a far better President than any of the Bush's or that dottering old fool "Regan" You're also an ignoramus if you think either Bush did a better job than Obama. Republican ignorance never fails to amaze me.
Attachments:

Republicans suck, democrats suck. Why? Because they're merely two cheeks to the same ass. The top 1% rule this country now. Corporations are people, and our politicians pockets are lined with corporate money. Why keep playing into a flawed and failing system? In a perfect world, Fairfax County- and every other county in the USA- would be neither Dem nor Rep. Wake up, sheeple!

In a perfect world, there wouldn't be anybody so dumb as to not be able to see a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Everyone would know where all the fundie, TEA Party, corporatist dumbfucks, bigots, and trouble-makers were hanging out.

More like... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone would know where all the fundie, TEA Party,
> corporatist dumbfucks, bigots, and trouble-makers
> were hanging out.

Don't forget the goobers -- all those ignorant sociopaths who love to soak up first world services but don't want to pay any taxes for them. They are all over on that worthless R-side as well.

Learn to Spell Republitard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fox News Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Are you calling Bill Clinton (the real first
> black
> > president) a good leader?
>
>
> Ok, now I think you must just be trolling. Bill
> Clinton was a far better President than any of the
> Bush's or that dottering old fool "Regan" You're
> also an ignoramus if you think either Bush did a
> better job than Obama. Republican ignorance never
> fails to amaze me.


Bill Clinton was liar. He had sexual relations with that woman (Moinca hotstuff Lewinksy). He did nothing to stop the Rwandan genocide cause he was busy get busy with Monica. Clinton could have killed Bin Laden but chose not too cause he was too lazy.

We are holding this dance until 2016
Attachments:

What Difference Does it Make Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We are holding this dance until 2016


In your dreams. They will all be in the mental ward becuase their major loss will have defeated them mentally.

Fox News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Clinton was liar. He had sexual relations
> with that woman (Moinca hotstuff Lewinksy).

Not according to the common definition or taht of the Court. Heavy petting is the term for what was going on.

> He did nothing to stop the Rwandan genocide cause he was
> busy get busy with Monica.

Stupid shit. The Rwandan genocide was in the Spring of 1994. Lewinsky first began work at the White House in the Summer of 1995.

> Clinton could have killed Bin Laden but chose not too
> cause he was too lazy.

No, he could not have, the baseless and incoherent babbling of assfucks like Sean Hannity notwithstanding.

More like... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In a perfect world, there wouldn't be anybody so
> dumb as to not be able to see a difference between
> Republicans and Democrats. Everyone would know
> where all the fundie, TEA Party, corporatist
> dumbfucks, bigots, and trouble-makers were hanging
> out.

In a perfect world, no one would be as dumb as to think either party is good for the people. Remove your blinders!