HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: uncle sam ()
Date: July 15, 2017 10:38PM

Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.

-------------------------

So how does Gerry O'Connell get off advertising in Mexico that people who come to Fairfax will be given jobs and green cards so long as they are loyal mexican democrats?

IS THAT NOT AN ALLIANCE WITH A FOREIGN NATION?

is not allot of what a "sanctuary city" does a collusion with sometime foreign militaries ?

why wouldn't such a thing be illegal for "power groups to do" without even the consent of Congress of the States United ?

THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T ALLOW CONGRESS TO DO IT, WHY WOULD LOCAL POLITICIANS BE GRANTED THE PRIVELAGE?

THEY AREN'T

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: BFTVT ()
Date: July 15, 2017 10:39PM

in some foreign countries that's legal and no doubt mexicans think it is

READ THE CONSTITUTION: IN THE USA IT ISN'T

(as if they didn't know)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: kmecw ()
Date: July 15, 2017 10:43PM

foreigners assume the debate is only about ejecting them from well paying gov jobs (it is) and kicking them out with ICE (not likely)

THE FACT IS many people were ripped off by those running sanctuary states and want their MONEY

these people are still alive and such, and CLAW BACK AND MONEY is more the issue than of future policy

it's about people who got rich by breaking laws, and people who want their damn money - as much as it is having a country that controls entry into the country (by good records, by wise laws)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: uncle sam ()
Date: July 16, 2017 03:21PM

fcc 333 fcc

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: nd9ct ()
Date: July 17, 2017 10:32AM

states and moreso renegade Counties (used to change states from red to blue) are in double jeopardy

* they acted without consent to form alliances with illegals + foreign militaries to get democrat voters to overthrow republicans and UP THEIR PAY INCREDIBLY

* they actually advertised in foreign countries to do this, and took money from foreign governments and even directions from them, for the money

* they didn't get consent of congress, meaning they acted renegade

* while congress is now aware and has not clearly "said no", there can be no consent of congress because hiriing illegals in government jobs to replace the citizens they are sworn to protect is treasonous. (there is no legal reasoning they can use as footing and win)


* they acted before and without consent, and still have no Consent of Congress


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: DNKJX ()
Date: July 17, 2017 12:19PM

While on this topic,

https://governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/newsarticle?articleId=20717

Sounds like treason. Impeach.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: nwcey ()
Date: July 19, 2017 10:50AM

little red riding hood

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: Edward Vacuous ()
Date: July 21, 2017 10:52AM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: ck9tp ()
Date: July 21, 2017 12:46PM

"IS THAT NOT AN ALLIANCE WITH A FOREIGN NATION?"

No it isn't. It is no different than the trade missions that state and local governments routinely send out to foreign nations.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 6fjdx ()
Date: August 03, 2017 08:55PM

v

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: yj7dv ()
Date: September 30, 2017 06:51PM

hourly reminder

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: f9dud ()
Date: January 12, 2018 07:17PM

f9dud

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 67xku ()
Date: February 26, 2018 08:12PM

67xku

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 3nh4j ()
Date: March 21, 2018 11:14PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: yeayeayea ()
Date: March 21, 2018 11:14PM

Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.Everything is discussed openly in Arlington and every Arlingtonian claims the right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic, the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question. Discussions happen in public and where matters are unclear or confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate even to mention: the Fairfaxianish question. It is taboo in our republic.

The Fairfaxian is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Fairfaxian and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”
One cannot defend himself against the Fairfaxian. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Fairfaxian wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Fairfaxian really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Fairfaxian. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

1. One cannot fight the Fairfaxian by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the Arlingtonian system or he will forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Fairfaxianish question with the Fairfaxians. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Fairfaxian the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Fairfaxian has nothing to say about Arlingtonian questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Fairfaxians is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
6. The Fairfaxian is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
7. A Fairfaxian cannot insult a Arlingtonian. Fairfaxianish slanders are but badges of honor for a Arlingtonian opponent of the Fairfaxians.
8. The more a Arlingtonian person or a Arlingtonian movement opposes the Fairfaxian, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Fairfaxians, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Fairfaxians, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Fairfaxian evaluates Arlingtonian questions from the Fairfaxianish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-fairfaxianism. He who defends the Fairfaxians harms his own people. One can only be a Fairfaxianish lackey or a Fairfaxianish opponent. Opposing the Fairfaxians is a matter of personal hygiene.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: JDonnet ()
Date: March 21, 2018 11:15PM

Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!
Dumb Libtards! QUIET!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: lumtk ()
Date: March 23, 2018 10:06AM

lumtk

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: ythgfd ()
Date: March 23, 2018 03:26PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: k9vvk ()
Date: March 25, 2018 12:13AM

k9vvk

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: u3ykd ()
Date: May 11, 2018 08:49AM

u3ykd

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 6kewu ()
Date: July 05, 2018 07:01PM

6kewu

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 7dnm7 ()
Date: August 09, 2018 10:27PM

7dnm7

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: vt4hj ()
Date: December 15, 2018 10:16PM

vt4hj

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: xnbtm ()
Date: January 31, 2019 11:36PM

xnbtm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: hwpc3 ()
Date: March 02, 2019 01:32AM

hwpc3

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 98sdfjh ()
Date: September 28, 2019 02:05PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: k ()
Date: April 07, 2020 12:57PM

d

Options: ReplyQuote
Ancient And Ancestral Antiquities Under UNESCO Classifications For Sale WhatsApp... +(237)673672176.
Posted by: Agbor ()
Date: April 07, 2020 09:20PM

Hi, There is a Native Village in a part in Africa , Precisely Cameroon who are willing to give out their Ancestral Heritage with great Spiritual Potency,Protection and wealth in substitution for Development and construction in their land . Kindly contact me for more Details via WhatsApp... +(237)673672176. Thank you!...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: 09ujdj ()
Date: April 18, 2020 11:04AM

d

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Section 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a foreign power There is no consent of Congress that allows renegade States.
Posted by: oisjdf ()
Date: April 24, 2020 01:44PM

d

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **    **   *******   ********   ******** 
 **     **   **  **   **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **    ****    **     **  **     **  **       
 **     **     **      ********  ********   ******   
 **     **     **            **  **         **       
 **     **     **     **     **  **         **       
  *******      **      *******   **         ******** 
This forum powered by Phorum.