Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Jones
()
Date: February 25, 2020 07:47PM
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Keeping up with the
()
Date: February 25, 2020 10:05PM
It is called a failure to hold business developers accountable for their activities and now expecting the rest of the community to pay the price.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Its Called Illegals And Leeches
()
Date: February 26, 2020 12:16AM
Being taken care to raise rents by the Democrats who are in charge in NOVA and not helping hardworking Americans .
Home ownership is supply and demand, if you cant afford Fairfax go somewhere you can afford, no free lunch to buy a home , rents in Fairfax are another story they are pushed up artificially by illegals and leeches who overcrowd apts and get welfare to allow them to pay higher prices for rents in apts and townhomes
All for votes for Democrats in the future
Deport All Illegals . No Welfare assistance for public charge immigrants , cancel their green cards and send them packing home
Take care of America for Americans not foreign national Democrats
You wont we know and that's why you are going to lose your asses in November 2020
America has had enough
STFU Democrats stop lying to the American people
Home ownership is supply and demand, if you cant afford Fairfax go somewhere you can afford, no free lunch to buy a home , rents in Fairfax are another story they are pushed up artificially by illegals and leeches who overcrowd apts and get welfare to allow them to pay higher prices for rents in apts and townhomes
All for votes for Democrats in the future
Deport All Illegals . No Welfare assistance for public charge immigrants , cancel their green cards and send them packing home
Take care of America for Americans not foreign national Democrats
You wont we know and that's why you are going to lose your asses in November 2020
America has had enough
STFU Democrats stop lying to the American people
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
xtc
()
Date: February 26, 2020 07:25AM
Fairfax is long lost.
Virginia is teetering on the edge of permanent anti-liberty socialism. If the dems win in Nov after what the state dems have done this session, the state is lost.
This is why I'm going to love it when I move out in 3 years. Sucked the system for as much as I could and then, just when there's not much left to suck out and the commies in Richmond and the Govt Center decide to take more from me to give to non-contributing leeches, I leave. They'll get nothing from me. My 4 cars, $1 million + house, dining out 3 times a week and all the other ways I could have been paying back into this shithole are saying adios.
Virginia is teetering on the edge of permanent anti-liberty socialism. If the dems win in Nov after what the state dems have done this session, the state is lost.
This is why I'm going to love it when I move out in 3 years. Sucked the system for as much as I could and then, just when there's not much left to suck out and the commies in Richmond and the Govt Center decide to take more from me to give to non-contributing leeches, I leave. They'll get nothing from me. My 4 cars, $1 million + house, dining out 3 times a week and all the other ways I could have been paying back into this shithole are saying adios.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Uncle Ralph
()
Date: February 26, 2020 07:37AM
Years ago I preached to all who would listen that FFC was devolving into a shithole and those who could should beat feet the fuck out. It was recognized someone would need to pay the carrying cost for all the illegals, ESL teachers and a bloated bureaucracy to manage it all.
Here:
https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2020/02/a-call-for-tax-hikes-in-fairfax-county/
Here:
https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2020/02/a-call-for-tax-hikes-in-fairfax-county/
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
white trash gtfo
()
Date: February 26, 2020 09:06AM
xtc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Virginia is teetering on the edge of permanent
> anti-liberty socialism.
you clowns have been crying that same tiresome spiel since the election of 1860
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Virginia is teetering on the edge of permanent
> anti-liberty socialism.
you clowns have been crying that same tiresome spiel since the election of 1860
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Hef
()
Date: February 26, 2020 12:26PM
It subsidizes an extremely small percentage of 'affordable' houses, creating essentially a lottery for people to win that need them. Doesn't seem like an affective method at all. For 40 million, they could hire a lot of building inspectors and other employees to fast track development of new housing where density is needed. But the NIMBYs would push back.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Your So Sickly Stupid
()
Date: February 26, 2020 01:42PM
>you clowns have been crying that same tiresome spiel since the election of 1860
Youll be squawking that libtarded crap while you lie in the street beaten to death in a robbery by a illegal till you bleed out
Youll be squawking that libtarded crap while you lie in the street beaten to death in a robbery by a illegal till you bleed out
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
To Qualify For The Lottery
()
Date: February 26, 2020 01:47PM
They need to make up to 130K a year and no less then 80K , let their asses rent and pay the full rental price with no assistance
This is another feel good special give away Democrat con game to show smiling minority "homeowners"
Hell yes its RACIST against all other Americans
Deport the illegals and welfare leech public charge immigrants and rents will drop
That does not square with future Democrat votes even though its best for the American people
This is another feel good special give away Democrat con game to show smiling minority "homeowners"
Hell yes its RACIST against all other Americans
Deport the illegals and welfare leech public charge immigrants and rents will drop
That does not square with future Democrat votes even though its best for the American people
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
You Dont Qualify
()
Date: February 26, 2020 02:04PM
100% Unconstitutional providing this program for certain county employees
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/magnet/magnet%20housing%20marketing%20document%20revised%20-%20june%202019.pdf
Affordable Housing in Fairfax
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/affordable-housing
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/adu/adu021720.pdf
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/wdu/wdubrochure021720.pdf
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/homeownership/homebuyers
There mostly full of immigrants and minorities making up to 101 K single and 145k with 4 persons
MAXIMUM HOUSEHOLD INCOME LIMITS
Affordability Level
-----------60% AMI 70% AMI 80% AMI 90% AMI 100% AMI 120% AMI
1 person $50,950 $59,450 $67,950 $76,400 $84,900 --$101,900
2 persons $58,250 $67,900 $77,650 $87,300 $97,050 --$116,450
3 persons $65,500 $76,400 $87,350 $98,250 $109,150-- $131,300
4 persons $72,800 $84,900 $97,050 $109,150 $121,300-- $145,550
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/magnet/magnet%20housing%20marketing%20document%20revised%20-%20june%202019.pdf
Affordable Housing in Fairfax
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/affordable-housing
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/adu/adu021720.pdf
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/sites/housing/files/assets/documents/wdu/wdubrochure021720.pdf
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/housing/homeownership/homebuyers
There mostly full of immigrants and minorities making up to 101 K single and 145k with 4 persons
MAXIMUM HOUSEHOLD INCOME LIMITS
Affordability Level
-----------60% AMI 70% AMI 80% AMI 90% AMI 100% AMI 120% AMI
1 person $50,950 $59,450 $67,950 $76,400 $84,900 --$101,900
2 persons $58,250 $67,900 $77,650 $87,300 $97,050 --$116,450
3 persons $65,500 $76,400 $87,350 $98,250 $109,150-- $131,300
4 persons $72,800 $84,900 $97,050 $109,150 $121,300-- $145,550
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Bill.N.
()
Date: February 26, 2020 03:07PM
Its Called Illegals And Leeches Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Being taken care to raise rents by the Democrats
> who are in charge in NOVA and not helping
> hardworking Americans .
Cut the crap. The problem predates Democratic control of the County government. When the decision was made to allow dense development in what has become the Silver Line Corridor it was entirely foreseeable that this development would create a huge demand for low income employees. It was at that time foreseeable at the time that surrounding jurisdictions could not be relied upon to house those low income workers. It was also foreseeable that if arrangements were not made to provide robust amounts of low income housing within short distances of the Silver Line Corridor employment areas, it would result in degradation of neighborhoods farther away, huge demands for additional public transportation and diminishing opportunities to force developers to include it later. Yet the politicians that were green lighting this development, Republicans as well as Democrats, conservative leaning as well as far left progressives, were happy to stick their heads in the sand and allow developers to mostly ignore the need to provide close in low cost housing for low income employees.
Well now the bill for this accumulated bipartisan incompetence has come due.
Regulation has become a pejorative among you on the right. Yet the essence of good regulation is to force those who create problems to deal with them themselves, rather than foisting them on the general population. That is precisely what has not happened in the Silver Line Corridor to date.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Being taken care to raise rents by the Democrats
> who are in charge in NOVA and not helping
> hardworking Americans .
Cut the crap. The problem predates Democratic control of the County government. When the decision was made to allow dense development in what has become the Silver Line Corridor it was entirely foreseeable that this development would create a huge demand for low income employees. It was at that time foreseeable at the time that surrounding jurisdictions could not be relied upon to house those low income workers. It was also foreseeable that if arrangements were not made to provide robust amounts of low income housing within short distances of the Silver Line Corridor employment areas, it would result in degradation of neighborhoods farther away, huge demands for additional public transportation and diminishing opportunities to force developers to include it later. Yet the politicians that were green lighting this development, Republicans as well as Democrats, conservative leaning as well as far left progressives, were happy to stick their heads in the sand and allow developers to mostly ignore the need to provide close in low cost housing for low income employees.
Well now the bill for this accumulated bipartisan incompetence has come due.
Regulation has become a pejorative among you on the right. Yet the essence of good regulation is to force those who create problems to deal with them themselves, rather than foisting them on the general population. That is precisely what has not happened in the Silver Line Corridor to date.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
There All Over Fairfax And Nova
()
Date: February 26, 2020 04:14PM
NOT JUST THE SILVER LINE CORRORIDOR . Illegal's and leeches deport them , when 200K people who should not be here are gone rents will lower
Let the business pay more for working AMERICANS , THEY THEN PASS IT ON TO THEIR CUSTOMERS
DEMOCRATS DONT SUPPORT AMERICA ITS ALL FOR FUTURE VOTES THATS NOT CRAP ITS FACT
Let the business pay more for working AMERICANS , THEY THEN PASS IT ON TO THEIR CUSTOMERS
DEMOCRATS DONT SUPPORT AMERICA ITS ALL FOR FUTURE VOTES THATS NOT CRAP ITS FACT
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
wrong again Bill
()
Date: February 26, 2020 04:49PM
Bill.N. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its Called Illegals And Leeches Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Being taken care to raise rents by the
> Democrats
> > who are in charge in NOVA and not helping
> > hardworking Americans .
>
> Cut the crap. The problem predates Democratic
> control of the County government. When the
> decision was made to allow dense development in
> what has become the Silver Line Corridor it was
> entirely foreseeable that this development would
> create a huge demand for low income employees. It
> was at that time foreseeable at the time that
> surrounding jurisdictions could not be relied upon
> to house those low income workers. It was also
> foreseeable that if arrangements were not made to
> provide robust amounts of low income housing
> within short distances of the Silver Line Corridor
> employment areas, it would result in degradation
> of neighborhoods farther away, huge demands for
> additional public transportation and diminishing
> opportunities to force developers to include it
> later. Yet the politicians that were green
> lighting this development, Republicans as well as
> Democrats, conservative leaning as well as far
> left progressives, were happy to stick their heads
> in the sand and allow developers to mostly ignore
> the need to provide close in low cost housing for
> low income employees.
>
> Well now the bill for this accumulated bipartisan
> incompetence has come due.
>
>
> Regulation has become a pejorative among you on
> the right. Yet the essence of good regulation is
> to force those who create problems to deal with
> them themselves, rather than foisting them on the
> general population. That is precisely what has
> not happened in the Silver Line Corridor to date.
Such bullshit. Much more so than your normal brain vomit you spout on here Billy. The essence of regulation is control, not making people responsible for shit deal with it themselves. Geez, you are one stupid motherfucker. For every regulation, someone (usually the government) gains power and those being regulating lose power.
You communist piece of shit. Fuck off.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its Called Illegals And Leeches Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Being taken care to raise rents by the
> Democrats
> > who are in charge in NOVA and not helping
> > hardworking Americans .
>
> Cut the crap. The problem predates Democratic
> control of the County government. When the
> decision was made to allow dense development in
> what has become the Silver Line Corridor it was
> entirely foreseeable that this development would
> create a huge demand for low income employees. It
> was at that time foreseeable at the time that
> surrounding jurisdictions could not be relied upon
> to house those low income workers. It was also
> foreseeable that if arrangements were not made to
> provide robust amounts of low income housing
> within short distances of the Silver Line Corridor
> employment areas, it would result in degradation
> of neighborhoods farther away, huge demands for
> additional public transportation and diminishing
> opportunities to force developers to include it
> later. Yet the politicians that were green
> lighting this development, Republicans as well as
> Democrats, conservative leaning as well as far
> left progressives, were happy to stick their heads
> in the sand and allow developers to mostly ignore
> the need to provide close in low cost housing for
> low income employees.
>
> Well now the bill for this accumulated bipartisan
> incompetence has come due.
>
>
> Regulation has become a pejorative among you on
> the right. Yet the essence of good regulation is
> to force those who create problems to deal with
> them themselves, rather than foisting them on the
> general population. That is precisely what has
> not happened in the Silver Line Corridor to date.
Such bullshit. Much more so than your normal brain vomit you spout on here Billy. The essence of regulation is control, not making people responsible for shit deal with it themselves. Geez, you are one stupid motherfucker. For every regulation, someone (usually the government) gains power and those being regulating lose power.
You communist piece of shit. Fuck off.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Whining Trumptard
()
Date: February 26, 2020 09:27PM
^^^Wah. I want to pay my employees shit. They won't be able to live near where my business on what I pay them. They won't be able to legally live anywhere in Northern Virginia on what I pay them. They won't be able to afford health insurance on what I pay them. They won't be able to afford to buy and maintain a car on what I pay them so they will need public transportation to get to work. They may even need to rely on food banks for food. It's not fair that I should have to pay additional tax to help cover the cost of providing basic subsistence for these employees that I am screwing over.
If there was any justice you wouldn't be paying 3% more in real estate taxes. You would be reimbursing the County for the entire cost of providing these services.
If there was any justice you wouldn't be paying 3% more in real estate taxes. You would be reimbursing the County for the entire cost of providing these services.
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Math Prof
()
Date: February 27, 2020 08:23AM
Assessments are shooting up. Together with the 3% rate increase, you’re looking at a total tax increase of 15-18%.
Dems always fuck over taxpayers!
Dems always fuck over taxpayers!
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
^^Thats A WIN WIN To DEM's
()
Date: February 27, 2020 12:06PM
Democrat's think taxing the hell out of US citizens to support illegals and leeches is wonderful
Trump has been giving feds those nice COLAS as Fairfax County just sucks them up to piss them away
Tax Waste Brain Teaser that's not hard to follow:
How many public services does Fairfax County offer to illegals
How many to immigrant public charges AKA Leeches
How many wasteful duplicate services does Fairfax And the State of Virginia have
The list goes on
Trump has been giving feds those nice COLAS as Fairfax County just sucks them up to piss them away
Tax Waste Brain Teaser that's not hard to follow:
How many public services does Fairfax County offer to illegals
How many to immigrant public charges AKA Leeches
How many wasteful duplicate services does Fairfax And the State of Virginia have
The list goes on
Re: How Does 3% Tax Increase On Existing Houses Make For Affordable Housing?
Posted by:
Repulate now or pay later
()
Date: February 27, 2020 01:00PM
wrong again Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Such bullshit. Much more so than your normal
> brain vomit you spout on here Billy. The essence
> of regulation is control, not making people
> responsible for shit deal with it themselves.
> Geez, you are one stupid motherfucker. For every
> regulation, someone (usually the government) gains
> power and those being regulating lose power.
>
> You communist piece of shit. Fuck off.
Typical response from some underinformed conservative.
The Founding Fathers understood the importance of proper regulations to the functioning of society. Part of what pissed them off was the British government's habit of overturning colonial regulations. The notion that the Founders wanted a society where people were able to do whatever they wanted is a modern conservative myth.
An unregulated free market society of any size is about as societally beneficial as busy highways where drivers are not regulated or policed. Much of what is fucked up about Northern Virginia today is the result of a failure to properly regulate property developers and businesses in the past.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Such bullshit. Much more so than your normal
> brain vomit you spout on here Billy. The essence
> of regulation is control, not making people
> responsible for shit deal with it themselves.
> Geez, you are one stupid motherfucker. For every
> regulation, someone (usually the government) gains
> power and those being regulating lose power.
>
> You communist piece of shit. Fuck off.
Typical response from some underinformed conservative.
The Founding Fathers understood the importance of proper regulations to the functioning of society. Part of what pissed them off was the British government's habit of overturning colonial regulations. The notion that the Founders wanted a society where people were able to do whatever they wanted is a modern conservative myth.
An unregulated free market society of any size is about as societally beneficial as busy highways where drivers are not regulated or policed. Much of what is fucked up about Northern Virginia today is the result of a failure to properly regulate property developers and businesses in the past.