HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Mary Catherine ()
Date: April 01, 2014 08:31AM

On WMAL's Mornings on the Mall today, Larry and Brian had on Lynne Cheney to talk politics. Mrs. Chaney, wife of the former Vice President Richard (or Dick), said that she and her husband are formerly endorsing Barbara Comstock for Congress in Virginia's 10th district. She said both she and Dick live in McLean, and it is important for them to have a true "conservative" representing them in Congress.

Way to go, Delegate Comstock! Keep the endorsements coming!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Shocker ()
Date: April 01, 2014 09:14AM

Mary Catherine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On WMAL's Mornings on the Mall today, Larry and
> Brian had on Lynne Cheney to talk politics. Mrs.
> Chaney, wife of the former Vice President Richard
> (or Dick), said that she and her husband are
> formerly endorsing Barbara Comstock for Congress
> in Virginia's 10th district. She said both she
> and Dick live in McLean, and it is important for
> them to have a true "conservative" representing
> them in Congress.
>
> Way to go, Delegate Comstock! Keep the
> endorsements coming!


The only person with lower favorables than the teaparty

lat-bateman-dodgeball

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Hunt Club ()
Date: April 01, 2014 05:37PM

Mary Catherine Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On WMAL's Mornings on the Mall today, Larry and
> Brian had on Lynne Cheney to talk politics. Mrs.
> Chaney, wife of the former Vice President Richard
> (or Dick), said that she and her husband are
> formerly endorsing Barbara Comstock for Congress
> in Virginia's 10th district. She said both she
> and Dick live in McLean, and it is important for
> them to have a true "conservative" representing
> them in Congress.
>
> Way to go, Delegate Comstock! Keep the
> endorsements coming!

After the way Lynne and Dick Cheney treated family friends when daughter Liz was running for Senator in Wyoming, I don't think the Cheney family will be making any political endorsements anytime soon. When Liz moved to Wyoming and started campaigning, even old line Republicans saw how toxic the Cheneys can be.

They seriously damaged their reputation within the Republican party with that fiasco of a Senate run. In supporting Liz, Mommy Lynne, Liz, and Dick spitted venom at anyone who didn't jump on the Liz bandwagon, and people, including those they all worked with politically for years and family members, saw a really dangerous side the this Cheney clan. No Republican would give that family time in the spotlight after their actions on the campaign trail with Liz.

Cheneys, being forcibly booted out of the Republican elite..couldn't have happened to a nicer family....

See Republicans, we told you all along Dick and clan were dangerous. Why did it take you this long to figure it out for yourselves?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Oakton Cougar ()
Date: April 01, 2014 06:04PM

Her husband is an administrator at Oakton HS where I go to school, so I support her!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Stop embarrassing Oakton ()
Date: April 18, 2014 11:00AM

Oakton Cougar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Her husband is an administrator at Oakton HS where
> I go to school, so I support her!

OK, here is a well informed Republican voter.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 11:02AM

Liz Cheney thinks she's Sarah Palin now with endorsements. Who the fuck is Liz Cheney?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Kardiac17 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 12:00PM

Stop embarrassing Oakton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oakton Cougar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Her husband is an administrator at Oakton HS
> where
> > I go to school, so I support her!
>
> OK, here is a well informed Republican voter.

Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: 70chip ()
Date: April 18, 2014 01:57PM

Kardiac17 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam


Ohh you mean the ultrasound they perform to show the mother the human being inside of them? How dare the babykiller be subjected to that exam right before they insert metal knives up their vagina to cut out and strangle the unborn. They should be allowed to pretend they're not involved in the slaughtering of their own.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Debbie Downer Democrat XDD ()
Date: April 18, 2014 02:54PM

Kardiac17 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam

Just more spew from the left. That's all they know how to respond - same old 6 talking points. Meanwhile, they don't acknowledge where Virginia sought to ensure that the cleanliness of abortion clinics in Virginia followed the same cleanliness standards as any medical facility in Virginia and again the Dems had more issues.

It's one thing when a liberal if for abortion. But, it's another when a Deb is faced with a bill that would improve the health standards in Virginia and they just knock it down because name "x" is associated with the effort.

The left has to shut up about all the vaginal probing stories in Virginia. Because the rest of us are sick of having a president inserting his fingers up our rear without wearing gloves and without using any grease. That is getting plenty frustrating.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Oh Please... ()
Date: April 18, 2014 03:10PM

Debbie Downer Democrat XDD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kardiac17 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam
>
> Just more spew from the left. That's all they
> know how to respond - same old 6 talking points.
> Meanwhile, they don't acknowledge where Virginia
> sought to ensure that the cleanliness of abortion
> clinics in Virginia followed the same cleanliness
> standards as any medical facility in Virginia and
> again the Dems had more issues.
>
> It's one thing when a liberal if for abortion.
> But, it's another when a Deb is faced with a bill
> that would improve the health standards in
> Virginia and they just knock it down because name
> "x" is associated with the effort.
>
> The left has to shut up about all the vaginal
> probing stories in Virginia. Because the rest of
> us are sick of having a president inserting his
> fingers up our rear without wearing gloves and
> without using any grease. That is getting plenty
> frustrating.

Yeah, that's what the right cares about - women's health. Don't even bother; no one believes the bullshit.

"The left has to shut up about all the vaginal probing stories in Virginia."

Oh no, we don't. You can't sweep something this monumentally intrusive and insulting under the rug. You made your bed - lie in it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 18, 2014 05:53PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Really??? ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:25PM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.aul.org/planned-parenthood-exhibitsexhi

That article - by Americans United for Life - and entitled 'Planned Parenthood’s Ultrasound Schizophrenia' - and ending with the statement that 'Planned Parenthood does not trust women.' - is incredibly misleading and insulting.

Women should be making the decision on ultrasounds in conjunction with their doctors - not legislators. And referencing judicial decisions in Texas, of all places, does not advance your argument. If there was truly a compelling need for an ultrasound before abortion, we would have seen the many horror stories that would result from not having one. We don't.

"Allowing women the opportunity to view their ultrasounds also serves an important role in providing informed consent, enabling women to exercise true choice. Upholding the Texas ultrasound law, the Fifth Circuit noted,

The point of informed consent laws is to allow the patient to evaluate her condition and render her best decision under difficult circumstances. Denying her up to date medical information is more of an abuse to her ability to decide than providing the information."

What a patronizing statement - made by a court dominated by Reagan and Bush appointees.

Particularly egregious is this statement:

"Planned Parenthood’s contrary suggestion, that ultrasound laws “intimidate” women, is wholly unsubstantiated, and even disproved by the research available. When asked if they would prefer having an ultrasound examination before an abortion, at least one study found that the majority of women would choose to have an ultrasound and simultaneously view the image".

I read that 'one' study. It was conducted in a poor area in South Africa - a completely different culture with different mores. Moreover, those who were asked to participate had to first agree to see an ultrasound of the fetus if they were asked to do so. The mere fact that this is the best that this article could do support their argument highlights the misleading nature of the article and the paucity of evidence in support of their position.

It is particularly infuriating that the right wing uses the bogus argument of women's health as a cover for the fact that their intent is to eliminate abortion and to humiliate women who have them. At least be honest, for God's sake.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: ppp5678 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:42PM

Really??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> http://www.aul.org/planned-parenthood-exhibitsexhi
>
>
> That article - by Americans United for Life - and
> entitled 'Planned Parenthood’s Ultrasound
> Schizophrenia' - and ending with the statement
> that 'Planned Parenthood does not trust women.' -
> is incredibly misleading and insulting.
>
> Women should be making the decision on ultrasounds
> in conjunction with their doctors - not
> legislators. And referencing judicial decisions in
> Texas, of all places, does not advance your
> argument. If there was truly a compelling need for
> an ultrasound before abortion, we would have seen
> the many horror stories that would result from not
> having one. We don't.
>
> "Allowing women the opportunity to view their
> ultrasounds also serves an important role in
> providing informed consent, enabling women to
> exercise true choice. Upholding the Texas
> ultrasound law, the Fifth Circuit noted,
>
> The point of informed consent laws is to allow the
> patient to evaluate her condition and render her
> best decision under difficult circumstances.
> Denying her up to date medical information is more
> of an abuse to her ability to decide than
> providing the information."
>
> What a patronizing statement - made by a court
> dominated by Reagan and Bush appointees.
>
> Particularly egregious is this statement:
>
> "Planned Parenthood’s contrary suggestion, that
> ultrasound laws “intimidate” women, is wholly
> unsubstantiated, and even disproved by the
> research available. When asked if they would
> prefer having an ultrasound examination before an
> abortion, at least one study found that the
> majority of women would choose to have an
> ultrasound and simultaneously view the image".
>
> I read that 'one' study. It was conducted in a
> poor area in South Africa - a completely different
> culture with different mores. Moreover, those who
> were asked to participate had to first agree to
> see an ultrasound of the fetus if they were asked
> to do so. The mere fact that this is the best that
> this article could do support their argument
> highlights the misleading nature of the article
> and the paucity of evidence in support of their
> position.
>
> It is particularly infuriating that the right wing
> uses the bogus argument of women's health as a
> cover for the fact that their intent is to
> eliminate abortion and to humiliate women who have
> them. At least be honest, for God's sake.
Attachments:
actress-bhumika-chawla-hot-saree-stills-26_720_southdreamz.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:50PM

What district is this crazy old right wing witch running in?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:54PM

Congressional District 10? That's Northern Virginia. We gotta get souls to the polls. Time to pick up a former Republican seat. Democrats unite!
Attachments:
192645_1914269702983_1429152554_4044295_6129896_o.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Kardiac17 ()
Date: April 19, 2014 02:27PM

70chip Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kardiac17 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam
>
>
> Ohh you mean the ultrasound they perform to show
> the mother the human being inside of them? How
> dare the babykiller be subjected to that exam
> right before they insert metal knives up their
> vagina to cut out and strangle the unborn. They
> should be allowed to pretend they're not involved
> in the slaughtering of their own.

Yeah thats the one I mean. The one that violates every personal right promised by the Constitution and the SCOTUS. But I can tell by your close set eyes that you are a little too inbred to understand. That's ok. There are plenty of people who will protect everybody's rights. Including yours.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: Kardiac17 ()
Date: April 19, 2014 02:31PM

Debbie Downer Democrat XDD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kardiac17 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Enjoy your forced ultrasound exam
>
> Just more spew from the left. That's all they
> know how to respond - same old 6 talking points.
> Meanwhile, they don't acknowledge where Virginia
> sought to ensure that the cleanliness of abortion
> clinics in Virginia followed the same cleanliness
> standards as any medical facility in Virginia and
> again the Dems had more issues.
>
> It's one thing when a liberal if for abortion.
> But, it's another when a Deb is faced with a bill
> that would improve the health standards in
> Virginia and they just knock it down because name
> "x" is associated with the effort.
>
> The left has to shut up about all the vaginal
> probing stories in Virginia. Because the rest of
> us are sick of having a president inserting his
> fingers up our rear without wearing gloves and
> without using any grease. That is getting plenty
> frustrating.

"having a president inserting his
fingers up our rear without wearing gloves and
without using any grease."
Well at least you sound like you know how that's supposed to be done. Have much of an anal fixation?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: New Endorsements for Comstock!
Posted by: truth-teller ()
Date: April 19, 2014 03:57PM

Chip Comstock is literally, a former lunch lady. Being an assistant principle at his age is a disgrace designed to boost his pension, not a real job. Way to go Chip! You're not serving sloppy joes for a couple years before you retire.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **  **     **  **    **  ********  ******** 
       **  ***   ***   **  **   **           **    
       **  **** ****    ****    **           **    
       **  ** *** **     **     ******       **    
 **    **  **     **     **     **           **    
 **    **  **     **     **     **           **    
  ******   **     **     **     ********     **    
This forum powered by Phorum.