HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Newt, McLean, Rick, Great Falls ()
Date: March 29, 2014 08:19PM

Dear Fellow Conservative,
We are writing you today to ask you to join us in supporting Barbara Comstock's bid for the 10th Congressional District of Virginia. We all have known and worked with Barbara for over a dozen years - some much longer - and she is hands down the most qualified, energetic, principled conservative running in the 10th District and she has our enthusiastic support.

While seeking common ground for the common good, Barbara has remained deeply committed to her strong values. She has a conservative record and has kept her promises of standing up for the unborn, fighting for family tax relief and protecting hardworking taxpayers, stopping taxpayer funding of abortions, defending the Second Amendment, writing and passing some of the strongest right to work legislation in the country, and led the fight on behalf of victims of human trafficking.

That's why the leftwing establishment in Washington, DC has spent millions of dollars trying to defeat her in previous elections and why they are spreading misinformation about her today.

Just last year, left-wing groups NARAL and Emily's List, major unions inside and outside Virginia and anti-gun millionaire Michael Bloomberg (and more!) bombarded her district with attack ads. But, Barbara refused to back down and won one of the most hard fought campaigns ever to be waged in Virginia. She had to run 9 pts ahead of the statewide ticket to secure her seat and prevail.

We are proud to stand with Barbara Comstock in her campaign for Congress.
She has an impeccable record of standing of up for our principles as a key member
of Congressman Frank Wolf's staff, the Chief Counsel of the largest House committee overseeing investigations;, a senior Justice Department official, a small businesswoman, and a Conservative Member of the House of Delegates. We know no one will work harder to secure this victory in the 10th District and to fight for us in Congress.

Please join the campaign today and sign your "Pledge to Vote for Barbara" today!

Thank you for your support. May God Bless you and your family.
Sincerely,

Governor George Allen Morton Blackwell Kate O'Beirne
Speaker Newt Gingrich Dave Bossie Kate Obenshain
Senator Rick Santorum Kay James Tim Phillips
Senator Fred Thompson Leonard Leo Pete Snyder
Jane Abraham Jim Nicholson

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Need more convincing ()
Date: March 29, 2014 08:26PM

I'm intrigued but I need more info. Is she a Conservative or just a Republican?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Hates women ()
Date: March 29, 2014 08:48PM

Any woman who votes for her is an idiot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Oh, OK ()
Date: March 29, 2014 09:41PM

Hates women Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any woman who votes for her is an idiot.

Oh, so she's a Democrat? Thanks, I didn't know that.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Durp ()
Date: March 29, 2014 11:30PM

I was hoping that this had to do with Bioshock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2HWBup2gAI

alas poor Booker
I knew him well
he was a man of infinite jest

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Snowballs Chance in Hell ()
Date: March 29, 2014 11:53PM

Governor George Allen Morton Blackwell Kate O'Beirne
Speaker Newt Gingrich Dave Bossie Kate Obenshain
Senator Rick Santorum Kay James Tim Phillips
Senator Fred Thompson Leonard Leo Pete Snyder
Jane Abraham Jim Nicholson

All the crazies - that's all I need to know. Count me out.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Go Howie ()
Date: March 30, 2014 09:22AM

I am a “conservative” who will be voting for the only true conservative running, Howie Lind. Howie is going to stand up the Barack Obama’s leftist, Marxist, socialist, fascist, Muslim agenda. Mr. Obama is a FOREIGNER, and doesn't deserve to be president. Howie will be there to expose Obama’s radical agenda.

Remember, Mr. Obama has not admitted Saddam moved all the WMD’s to Syria after 9-11. Mr. Obama did not call Malaysian flight 370 a terrorist act, Mr. Obama is a Muslim, and pals around with terrorists. Mr Obama gives all Black people cell phones and has the gall to call them “Obama Phones.” Mr. Obama is just shucking and jiving his way through the presidency. He is planning on Sharia law trumping our laws in this country. He is decimating our military, he is destroying one sixth of our economy. History will show Mr Obama “The Food Stamp President.”

Howie Lind will show conservative leadership in the house and finally impeach Obama for forging his birth certificate.

Howie Lind will hold more hearings on the IRS Scandal and Benghazi to get to the bottom of just what happened, and Howie will vote dozens of times if he has to, to repeal ObamaCare, tm.

Howie Lind, just like Newt Gingrich and David Vitter, is a God fearing “conservative” who loves his wife. Barbara Comstock is a RINO. God bless my fellow conservatives and Great Americans Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, David Vitter, Sarah and Bristol Palin, Chris Plante, Sean Hannity, Larry O’Connor (one of the nicest and smartest homosexuals you will ever meet), Andrew Breitbart, Fred Grandy, Mrs. Fred, and of course, George Zimmerman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Need more convincing ()
Date: March 30, 2014 09:46AM

I'm not voting for someone just to go after Obama. I'm a Conservative, not a stupid liberal. What you are talking about are just addressing those crazy trendy media issues. And I'm not impressed by name dropping.

What meaningful things are you going to do to lower taxes, reduce government, and return America to the land of the free?

No one is as disgusted by Obama and his liberal policies as I am. But I prefer to focus on what good we can do, not why the other guy sucks.

I hope our Conservatives can come up with better campaign strategies.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Loundoun Dad ()
Date: March 30, 2014 10:33AM

I wonder why Newt and Rick forgot to mention this tidbit

On February 14, 2012, Barbara Comstock voted for a bill “that requires women to have a ‘transvaginal ultrasound’ before undergoing abortions.” [HB 462].

This vote led to Amy Poehler on Weekend Update, and Jon Stewart on the Daily Show to pointedly eviscerate the Virginia legislature.

Also, news outlets around the world reported on this legislation for an invasive and unnecessary procedure. This reporting and mockery made the Virginia legislature the laughing [Com]stock of the scientific and medical communities worldwide, and put Virginia on display as backward misogynists.

Her vote was an embarrassment for all Virginians. When I get Comstock people knocking at my door soon, and I will, I will simply ask, "why did she vote to require a 'medical' procedure that the medical community deemed unnecessary and in some cases dangerous?"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: you were pwned ()
Date: March 30, 2014 10:46AM

Need more convincing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm not voting for someone just to go after Obama.
> I'm a Conservative, not a stupid liberal. What you
> are talking about are just addressing those crazy
> trendy media issues. And I'm not impressed by name
> dropping.
>
Um, I think the Howie Lind person was being satirical using past "conservative" talking points to cast doubt on the "conservative agenda."

Howie Lind loves his wife like Newt Gigrich, and David Vitter??? Do you know what is going on with Howie and his wife?

Now, you should really be impressed with the Howie Lind "fan," because it appears, you accepted his BS, as a legitimate political position, (though skewed and angry), hook, line, and sinker.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Stumbled upon this ()
Date: March 30, 2014 10:54AM

you were pwned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Need more convincing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm not voting for someone just to go after
> Obama.
> > I'm a Conservative, not a stupid liberal. What
> you
> > are talking about are just addressing those
> crazy
> > trendy media issues. And I'm not impressed by
> name
> > dropping.
> >
> Um, I think the Howie Lind person was being
> satirical using past "conservative" talking points
> to cast doubt on the "conservative agenda."
>
> Howie Lind loves his wife like Newt Gigrich, and
> David Vitter??? Do you know what is going on with
> Howie and his wife?
>
> Now, you should really be impressed with the Howie
> Lind "fan," because it appears, you accepted his
> BS, as a legitimate political position, (though
> skewed and angry), hook, line, and sinker.

So, as a conservative, you fully admit that these were actually conservative talking points?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: do you only watch Fox News? ()
Date: March 30, 2014 11:21AM

Need more convincing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
. What you
> are talking about are just addressing those crazy
> trendy media issues.

"Trendy media issues?" They can only be "media issues" if you only watched Fox News and listened to WMAL. Otherwise, they were "conservative talking points."

Have some fun. go to LexisNexis. Most points the Howie Lin fan made, at some point, were articulated clearly by "conservative" hero Sarah Palin on Fox News.


"Shuckin' an jivin' was a dead give-away.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Stumbler ()
Date: March 30, 2014 11:26AM

I heard that he does shuck and jive. He hosts hip-hop parties in the White House. And remember when he gave that kid the terririst fist jab?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: WMAL Fan ()
Date: March 30, 2014 11:33AM

Stumbler Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I heard that he does shuck and jive. He hosts
> hip-hop parties in the White House. And remember
> when he gave that kid the terririst fist jab?


Yes, I heard all about it on WMAL. Isn't Larry the smartest homosexual out there?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Binge Drinker ()
Date: March 30, 2014 11:38AM

And what is wrong with getting your news from WMAL? They recently reported the Obama uses crack cocaine in the White House and Gerry Connolly is a "drunken Irishman". These are stories the lame stream media will not report on. Because, you know, hey are lame.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Palinite ()
Date: March 30, 2014 11:44AM

Snowballs Chance in Hell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Governor George Allen Morton Blackwell Kate
> O'Beirne
> Speaker Newt Gingrich Dave Bossie Kate Obenshain
> Senator Rick Santorum Kay James Tim Phillips
> Senator Fred Thompson Leonard Leo Pete Snyder
> Jane Abraham Jim Nicholson
>
> All the crazies - that's all I need to know. Count
> me out.

My hero,Sarah Palin, does not want us to reference "Hell" and any word associated with "cold" or "frozen" when referring to "never," because it is offensive to her Native Alaskan Family.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Keep Em Coming ()
Date: March 30, 2014 12:05PM

Go Howie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am a “conservative” who will be voting for
> the only true conservative running, Howie Lind.
> Howie is going to stand up the Barack Obama’s
> leftist, Marxist, socialist, fascist, Muslim
> agenda. Mr. Obama is a FOREIGNER, and doesn't
> deserve to be president. Howie will be there to
> expose Obama’s radical agenda.
>
> Remember, Mr. Obama has not admitted Saddam moved
> all the WMD’s to Syria after 9-11. Mr. Obama
> did not call Malaysian flight 370 a terrorist act,
> Mr. Obama is a Muslim, and pals around with
> terrorists. Mr Obama gives all Black people cell
> phones and has the gall to call them “Obama
> Phones.” Mr. Obama is just shucking and jiving
> his way through the presidency. He is planning on
> Sharia law trumping our laws in this country. He
> is decimating our military, he is destroying one
> sixth of our economy. History will show Mr Obama
> “The Food Stamp President.”
>
> Howie Lind will show conservative leadership in
> the house and finally impeach Obama for forging
> his birth certificate.
>
> Howie Lind will hold more hearings on the IRS
> Scandal and Benghazi to get to the bottom of just
> what happened, and Howie will vote dozens of times
> if he has to, to repeal ObamaCare, tm.
>
> Howie Lind, just like Newt Gingrich and David
> Vitter, is a God fearing “conservative” who
> loves his wife. Barbara Comstock is a RINO. God
> bless my fellow conservatives and Great Americans
> Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, David Vitter, Sarah and
> Bristol Palin, Chris Plante, Sean Hannity, Larry
> O’Connor (one of the nicest and smartest
> homosexuals you will ever meet), Andrew Breitbart,
> Fred Grandy, Mrs. Fred, and of course, George
> Zimmerman.

Well done, sir - assuming, of course, that this is a parody (hard to tell on this site). Stick around for a while. We need help fending off the onslaught of crazies.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Even Santorum can't support Lind ()
Date: March 30, 2014 01:29PM

Howie Lind, "Conservative."



http://jhpolitics.com/2014/02/virginia-behind-howie-linds-serious-moral-defects/

As for Comstock, she voted against the road bill, against raises for teachers, and she voted for the ultrasound bill. She can be moderate on some issues, but when the "conservatives" come knocking, she sides with them and not her district.

Please delegate Comstock, double down on "obamaCare," and Benghazi. Make Campaign appearances with Santorum and Gingrich.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Because she's an attention whore ()
Date: March 30, 2014 02:56PM

If by conservative, you mean stupid, then no, I will not support Barbie Comcock.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Larry O'Connor WMAL ()
Date: March 30, 2014 03:33PM

Others who have endorsed Barbara Comstock include

Mark Levin, Radio talk show host
Mitt Romney, failed nominee
Eric Cantor, obstructionist
Brent Bozell, professional liar
Citizens' United, nuff said
John Bolton, professional United Nations hater
David Ramadan, a man afraid to stand up to Michele Bachmann's mis-characterization of him.

The list goes on and on.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: None of the Above ()
Date: March 30, 2014 05:44PM

Yet again, we're given the choice of a bunch of social conservative lunatics from the VA GOP.

No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives to be found, although I'm sure they will all pretend that Ronnie would be proud of their efforts.

I just don't get the party leadership. You lose the state twice to Obama. George Allen becomes a social conservative loon and he loses. Cuccinelli is an extremist for social issues and is easily beaten by a candidate no one had any passion for.

So after so many loses, who do they run in a district that went for Obama, McAuliffe, and Kaine? More social conservatives who talk about forcing women to keep rape pregnancies and think gay marriage is more important than budget deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is like they want to lose again.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Go to Lynchburg sweetie ()
Date: March 30, 2014 06:48PM

Barbara, we don't act like hillbillies here in nova. Take your clown show on the road.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Need more convincing ()
Date: March 30, 2014 08:04PM

you were pwned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Need more convincing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm not voting for someone just to go after
> Obama.
> > I'm a Conservative, not a stupid liberal. What
> you
> > are talking about are just addressing those
> crazy
> > trendy media issues. And I'm not impressed by
> name
> > dropping.
> >
> Um, I think the Howie Lind person was being
> satirical using past "conservative" talking points
> to cast doubt on the "conservative agenda."
>
> Howie Lind loves his wife like Newt Gigrich, and
> David Vitter??? Do you know what is going on with
> Howie and his wife?
>
> Now, you should really be impressed with the Howie
> Lind "fan," because it appears, you accepted his
> BS, as a legitimate political position, (though
> skewed and angry), hook, line, and sinker.

Like a typical liberal you're a moron. Clearly I wasn't accepting what the poster wrote. Anyone could see that if they weren't an idiot or partisan hack.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Henro ()
Date: March 31, 2014 02:03PM

Does she like testicles dipped into her mouth?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: sockpuppet ()
Date: March 31, 2014 02:10PM

None of the Above Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yet again, we're given the choice of a bunch of
> social conservative lunatics from the VA GOP.
>
> No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives to be
> found, although I'm sure they will all pretend
> that Ronnie would be proud of their efforts.
>
> I just don't get the party leadership. You lose
> the state twice to Obama. George Allen becomes a
> social conservative loon and he loses. Cuccinelli
> is an extremist for social issues and is easily
> beaten by a candidate no one had any passion for.
>
> So after so many loses, who do they run in a
> district that went for Obama, McAuliffe, and
> Kaine? More social conservatives who talk about
> forcing women to keep rape pregnancies and think
> gay marriage is more important than budget
> deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is like they
> want to lose again.


Shocking I know but some people actually have things they truly believe in rather than making all decisions based on popular opinion and polling data. Are you suggesting that anyone that loses an election should immediately abandon all their previously held positions.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Utopia is down south! ()
Date: March 31, 2014 02:59PM

sockpuppet Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> None of the Above Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Yet again, we're given the choice of a bunch of
> > social conservative lunatics from the VA GOP.
> >
> > No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives to be
> > found, although I'm sure they will all pretend
> > that Ronnie would be proud of their efforts.
> >
> > I just don't get the party leadership. You
> lose
> > the state twice to Obama. George Allen becomes
> a
> > social conservative loon and he loses.
> Cuccinelli
> > is an extremist for social issues and is easily
> > beaten by a candidate no one had any passion
> for.
> >
> > So after so many loses, who do they run in a
> > district that went for Obama, McAuliffe, and
> > Kaine? More social conservatives who talk
> about
> > forcing women to keep rape pregnancies and
> think
> > gay marriage is more important than budget
> > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is like
> they
> > want to lose again.
>
>
> Shocking I know but some people actually have
> things they truly believe in rather than making
> all decisions based on popular opinion and polling
> data. Are you suggesting that anyone that loses
> an election should immediately abandon all their
> previously held positions.


No we are telling you nut jobs to move to south carolina and live in your southern utopia of high unemployment, low education, and high venereal diseases because the rest of us actual fiscal conservatives think that your my way or the highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is last century.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: EuellG ()
Date: March 31, 2014 06:27PM

hm interesting..

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Ghost of Goldwater ()
Date: April 01, 2014 09:16PM

Utopia is down south! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sockpuppet Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > None of the Above Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Yet again, we're given the choice of a bunch
> of
> > > social conservative lunatics from the VA GOP.
>
> > >
> > > No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives to
> be
> > > found, although I'm sure they will all
> pretend
> > > that Ronnie would be proud of their efforts.
>
> > >
> > > I just don't get the party leadership. You
> > lose
> > > the state twice to Obama. George Allen
> becomes
> > a
> > > social conservative loon and he loses.
> > Cuccinelli
> > > is an extremist for social issues and is
> easily
> > > beaten by a candidate no one had any passion
> > for.
> > >
> > > So after so many loses, who do they run in a
> > > district that went for Obama, McAuliffe, and
> > > Kaine? More social conservatives who talk
> > about
> > > forcing women to keep rape pregnancies and
> > think
> > > gay marriage is more important than budget
> > > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is like
> > they
> > > want to lose again.
> >
> >
> > Shocking I know but some people actually have
> > things they truly believe in rather than making
> > all decisions based on popular opinion and
> polling
> > data. Are you suggesting that anyone that
> loses
> > an election should immediately abandon all
> their
> > previously held positions.
>
>
> No we are telling you nut jobs to move to south
> carolina and live in your southern utopia of high
> unemployment, low education, and high venereal
> diseases because the rest of us actual fiscal
> conservatives think that your my way or the
> highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is last
> century.

Our kind needs to start standing up. Especially in northern VA, it will be a sea of blue if they don't ditch the Christian culture warriors.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Comstock=Blacburnk ()
Date: April 13, 2014 01:20PM

Ghost of Goldwater Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Utopia is down south! Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > sockpuppet Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > None of the Above Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Yet again, we're given the choice of a
> bunch
> > of
> > > > social conservative lunatics from the VA
> GOP.
> >
> > > >
> > > > No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives
> to
> > be
> > > > found, although I'm sure they will all
> > pretend
> > > > that Ronnie would be proud of their efforts.
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > I just don't get the party leadership. You
> > > lose
> > > > the state twice to Obama. George Allen
> > becomes
> > > a
> > > > social conservative loon and he loses.
> > > Cuccinelli
> > > > is an extremist for social issues and is
> > easily
> > > > beaten by a candidate no one had any
> passion
> > > for.
> > > >
> > > > So after so many loses, who do they run in
> a
> > > > district that went for Obama, McAuliffe,
> and
> > > > Kaine? More social conservatives who talk
> > > about
> > > > forcing women to keep rape pregnancies and
> > > think
> > > > gay marriage is more important than budget
> > > > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is like
> > > they
> > > > want to lose again.
> > >
> > >
> > > Shocking I know but some people actually have
> > > things they truly believe in rather than
> making
> > > all decisions based on popular opinion and
> > polling
> > > data. Are you suggesting that anyone that
> > loses
> > > an election should immediately abandon all
> > their
> > > previously held positions.
> >
> >
> > No we are telling you nut jobs to move to south
> > carolina and live in your southern utopia of
> high
> > unemployment, low education, and high venereal
> > diseases because the rest of us actual fiscal
> > conservatives think that your my way or the
> > highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is last
> > century.
>
> Our kind needs to start standing up. Especially
> in northern VA, it will be a sea of blue if they
> don't ditch the Christian culture warriors.

I heard Del. Comstock on WMAL radio yesterday. It appears she has dropped 25-30 IQ points since I last heard her talk. I mean, it was like listening to Marsha Backburn. Why do they all have to get really stupid during the Republican primary?

We don't need that type of stupid representing the 10th district.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: coco for cocopuffs ()
Date: April 13, 2014 01:33PM

Comstock=Blacburnk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ghost of Goldwater Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Utopia is down south! Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > sockpuppet Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > None of the Above Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Yet again, we're given the choice of a
> > bunch
> > > of
> > > > > social conservative lunatics from the VA
> > GOP.
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No Goldwater or even Reagan conservatives
> > to
> > > be
> > > > > found, although I'm sure they will all
> > > pretend
> > > > > that Ronnie would be proud of their
> efforts.
> >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I just don't get the party leadership.
> You
> > > > lose
> > > > > the state twice to Obama. George Allen
> > > becomes
> > > > a
> > > > > social conservative loon and he loses.
> > > > Cuccinelli
> > > > > is an extremist for social issues and is
> > > easily
> > > > > beaten by a candidate no one had any
> > passion
> > > > for.
> > > > >
> > > > > So after so many loses, who do they run
> in
> > a
> > > > > district that went for Obama, McAuliffe,
> > and
> > > > > Kaine? More social conservatives who
> talk
> > > > about
> > > > > forcing women to keep rape pregnancies
> and
> > > > think
> > > > > gay marriage is more important than
> budget
> > > > > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is
> like
> > > > they
> > > > > want to lose again.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Shocking I know but some people actually
> have
> > > > things they truly believe in rather than
> > making
> > > > all decisions based on popular opinion and
> > > polling
> > > > data. Are you suggesting that anyone that
> > > loses
> > > > an election should immediately abandon all
> > > their
> > > > previously held positions.
> > >
> > >
> > > No we are telling you nut jobs to move to
> south
> > > carolina and live in your southern utopia of
> > high
> > > unemployment, low education, and high
> venereal
> > > diseases because the rest of us actual fiscal
> > > conservatives think that your my way or the
> > > highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is
> last
> > > century.
> >
> > Our kind needs to start standing up.
> Especially
> > in northern VA, it will be a sea of blue if
> they
> > don't ditch the Christian culture warriors.
>
> I heard Del. Comstock on WMAL radio yesterday.
> It appears she has dropped 25-30 IQ points since I
> last heard her talk. I mean, it was like
> listening to Marsha Backburn. Why do they all
> have to get really stupid during the Republican
> primary?
>
> We don't need that type of stupid representing the
> 10th district.


Haha! San Hannity and Mark Levin both endorsed Barbara Comstock. Those endorsements are I need to justify voting for John Foust.


Is Sarah Palin's endorsement far behind?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: South Riding Dad ()
Date: April 13, 2014 03:15PM

coco for cocopuffs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Comstock=Blacburnk Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ghost of Goldwater Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Utopia is down south! Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > sockpuppet Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > None of the Above Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Yet again, we're given the choice of a
> > > bunch
> > > > of
> > > > > > social conservative lunatics from the
> VA
> > > GOP.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No Goldwater or even Reagan
> conservatives
> > > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > found, although I'm sure they will all
> > > > pretend
> > > > > > that Ronnie would be proud of their
> > efforts.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just don't get the party leadership.
> > You
> > > > > lose
> > > > > > the state twice to Obama. George Allen
> > > > becomes
> > > > > a
> > > > > > social conservative loon and he loses.
> > > > > Cuccinelli
> > > > > > is an extremist for social issues and
> is
> > > > easily
> > > > > > beaten by a candidate no one had any
> > > passion
> > > > > for.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So after so many loses, who do they run
> > in
> > > a
> > > > > > district that went for Obama,
> McAuliffe,
> > > and
> > > > > > Kaine? More social conservatives who
> > talk
> > > > > about
> > > > > > forcing women to keep rape pregnancies
> > and
> > > > > think
> > > > > > gay marriage is more important than
> > budget
> > > > > > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it is
> > like
> > > > > they
> > > > > > want to lose again.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Shocking I know but some people actually
> > have
> > > > > things they truly believe in rather than
> > > making
> > > > > all decisions based on popular opinion
> and
> > > > polling
> > > > > data. Are you suggesting that anyone
> that
> > > > loses
> > > > > an election should immediately abandon
> all
> > > > their
> > > > > previously held positions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No we are telling you nut jobs to move to
> > south
> > > > carolina and live in your southern utopia
> of
> > > high
> > > > unemployment, low education, and high
> > venereal
> > > > diseases because the rest of us actual
> fiscal
> > > > conservatives think that your my way or the
> > > > highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is
> > last
> > > > century.
> > >
> > > Our kind needs to start standing up.
> > Especially
> > > in northern VA, it will be a sea of blue if
> > they
> > > don't ditch the Christian culture warriors.
> >
> > I heard Del. Comstock on WMAL radio yesterday.
>
> > It appears she has dropped 25-30 IQ points since
> I
> > last heard her talk. I mean, it was like
> > listening to Marsha Backburn. Why do they all
> > have to get really stupid during the Republican
> > primary?
> >
> > We don't need that type of stupid representing
> the
> > 10th district
> a
> Haha! San Hannity and Mark Levin both endorsed's
> Barbara Comstock. Those endorsements are I need
> to justify voting for John Foust.
>

Recently, Barbara Comstock claimed she was following Rush Limbaugh's advice, so she voted for Obama in the 2008 VA Democratic primary. She referenced Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos" as the motivator for her vote for Obama.

Operation Chaos was designed for Republicans to vote for Hillary, not Obama, after Obama had sealed the delegate count, and OC was started after the Virginia Democratic primary had taken place.

So, what we have learned here is Barbara Comstock is a follower of Rush Limbaugh, and she easily gets confused.

We don't need a "Dittohead" who is not familiar with critical thinking skills representing us in the US Capitol.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: truthteller ()
Date: April 13, 2014 05:48PM

Washington Times: Seeking U.S. House seat, GOP’s Comstock defends ‘08 Obama vote in Dem primary

Delegate Barbara J. Comstock’s congressional campaign attempted to stiff-arm reports Monday that she voted for Barack Obama in Virginia’s 2008 Democratic primary by claiming it was part of a conservative bid to affect the Democratic presidential primaries six years ago.

The campaign defended the vote for Mr. Obama by arguing that it was part of Operation Chaos, a movement spearheaded by conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh in late February 2008 as Mr. Obama’s campaign was picking up steam and had won several consecutive primaries over Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Fairfax Republican “had participated in Rush Limbaugh’s 2008 ‘Operation Chaos’ to keep the Democrat primary going and nominate who she thought was the weakest candidate who Republican John McCain could beat,” campaign manager Susan Falconer said in a statement.

The movement, however, was originally meant to ensure Mr. Obama got “bloodied up” politically, Mr. Limbaugh told Fox News in May 2008 as Mr. Obama was on the cusp of securing the nomination.

“He was riding the messianic trail,” Mr. Limbaugh said at the time. “The McCain campaign had sworn they were not going to criticize Obama. Who better than the Clintons to do it? But for that to happen … she needed to stay in.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/7/gops-comstock-cast-08-democrat-ballot-as-part-of-o/#ixzz2yo03z9ub

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Chantillly checking in ()
Date: April 14, 2014 08:44AM

South Riding Dad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> coco for cocopuffs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Comstock=Blacburnk Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Ghost of Goldwater Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Utopia is down south! Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > sockpuppet Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > None of the Above Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Yet again, we're given the choice of
> a
> > > > bunch
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > social conservative lunatics from the
> > VA
> > > > GOP.
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No Goldwater or even Reagan
> > conservatives
> > > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > found, although I'm sure they will
> all
> > > > > pretend
> > > > > > > that Ronnie would be proud of their
> > > efforts.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I just don't get the party leadership.
>
> > > You
> > > > > > lose
> > > > > > > the state twice to Obama. George
> Allen
> > > > > becomes
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > social conservative loon and he loses.
>
> > > > > > Cuccinelli
> > > > > > > is an extremist for social issues and
> > is
> > > > > easily
> > > > > > > beaten by a candidate no one had any
> > > > passion
> > > > > > for.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So after so many loses, who do they
> run
> > > in
> > > > a
> > > > > > > district that went for Obama,
> > McAuliffe,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > Kaine? More social conservatives who
> > > talk
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > forcing women to keep rape
> pregnancies
> > > and
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > gay marriage is more important than
> > > budget
> > > > > > > deficits. Astonishingly stupid, it
> is
> > > like
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > want to lose again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shocking I know but some people
> actually
> > > have
> > > > > > things they truly believe in rather
> than
> > > > making
> > > > > > all decisions based on popular opinion
> > and
> > > > > polling
> > > > > > data. Are you suggesting that anyone
> > that
> > > > > loses
> > > > > > an election should immediately abandon
> > all
> > > > > their
> > > > > > previously held positions.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No we are telling you nut jobs to move to
> > > south
> > > > > carolina and live in your southern utopia
> > of
> > > > high
> > > > > unemployment, low education, and high
> > > venereal
> > > > > diseases because the rest of us actual
> > fiscal
> > > > > conservatives think that your my way or
> the
> > > > > highway horseshit, bible thumping crap is
> > > last
> > > > > century.
> > > >
> > > > Our kind needs to start standing up.
> > > Especially
> > > > in northern VA, it will be a sea of blue if
> > > they
> > > > don't ditch the Christian culture warriors.
> > >
> > > I heard Del. Comstock on WMAL radio yesterday.
>
> >
> > > It appears she has dropped 25-30 IQ points
> since
> > I
> > > last heard her talk. I mean, it was like
> > > listening to Marsha Backburn. Why do they
> all
> > > have to get really stupid during the
> Republican
> > > primary?
> > >
> > > We don't need that type of stupid
> representing
> > the
> > > 10th district
> > a
> > Haha! San Hannity and Mark Levin both
> endorsed's
> > Barbara Comstock. Those endorsements are I
> need
> > to justify voting for John Foust.
> >
>
> Recently, Barbara Comstock claimed she was
> following Rush Limbaugh's advice, so she voted
> for Obama in the 2008 VA Democratic primary. She
> referenced Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos" as the
> motivator for her vote for Obama.
>
> Operation Chaos was designed for Republicans to
> vote for Hillary, not Obama, after Obama had
> sealed the delegate count, and OC was started
> after the Virginia Democratic primary had taken
> place.
>
> So, what we have learned here is Barbara Comstock
> is a follower of Rush Limbaugh, and she easily
> gets confused.
>
> We don't need a "Dittohead" who is not familiar
> with critical thinking skills representing us in
> the US Capitol.


So, she cant remember why she voted for someone, and any details for that vote are sketchy? Also, she follows Rush Limbaugh's political council? Yeah, we need her casting votes in the House real soon.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: stephen ()
Date: April 14, 2014 10:10AM

I would never vote for this person.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Richmond follower ()
Date: April 14, 2014 12:28PM

Delegate Comstock voted for authorizing the House of Delegates to hire counsel to oppose gay marriage cases. She voted for mandatory photo ID's to disenfranchise youth, minorities and the elderly.

She voted against the Omnibus Road bill.

She voted for a personhood statute, a mandatory transvaginal ultrasound before a woman can get an abortion, but only after a 24 hour waiting period. She also voted to allow gun rights back to “guilty by reason of insanity” convicted felons, AND she voted to repeal the one a month handgun limit. She voted for a Stand Your Ground law in Virginia. She voted to authorize concealed carry in places that serve alcohol, and voted in favor of a law prohibiting the implantation of microchips in humans for some odd reason.

She voted to force police to inquire of immigration status during arrests.

She has a track record against women, youth, minorities, gays, the elderly, supporters of reasonable firearm restrictions, and people that use state roads. And she is considered the moderate Republican in the race.

Why are we even here?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Certifiable ()
Date: April 14, 2014 12:45PM

"[She] voted in favor of a law prohibiting the implantation of microchips in humans". Well, that's all I need to know.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: why? ()
Date: April 14, 2014 12:50PM

Certifiable Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "[She] voted in favor of a law prohibiting the
> implantation of microchips in humans". Well,
> that's all I need to know.


Why, or why not, would one implant a microchip?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Booker ()
Date: April 14, 2014 01:17PM

OUR PROPHET - Zachary Comstock! A TRUE CONSERVATIVE!
Attachments:
BioShock-Infinite-Comstock.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: WilliamRobert ()
Date: April 14, 2014 01:23PM

Barbara can suck a dick right along her worthless husband chip. That is all.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Fed Up ()
Date: April 14, 2014 01:24PM

why? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Certifiable Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "[She] voted in favor of a law prohibiting the
> > implantation of microchips in humans". Well,
> > that's all I need to know.
>
>
> Why, or why not, would one implant a microchip?

Who knows? Maybe to track Grandma so she doesn't wander away. Maybe to take advantage of new medical technology (a la pacemakers). But it really doesn't matter. Some ignorant tool got a wild hair up his ass over this issue, probably thinking a microchip represents Government intrusion or is an instrument of the devil, and got a bill put on the legislative agenda. Comstock and other Republican loonies probably thought 'I don't know what the heck this thing is, but it looks scary' and voted for the bill. In any case, we don't need any more willfully ignorant people in the legislature.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Not a NRA member ()
Date: April 14, 2014 01:56PM

The more you know

Delegate Comstock voted for the following bills

HB 109 – Prohibits the state from tracking private gun transaction, severely constraining the ability law enforcement to prevent illegal gun sales to violent groups and individuals.

HB 505 – allow conceal and carry in bars, and voted to allow those people who open carry to consume alcohol.

SB 1335 – prohibit disclosures of concealed handgun permits. Information of permit holder cannot be disclosed to law enforcement officials.
SB 323 – Voted to eliminate the restriction on multiple non-dealer handgun purchases within 30 days.

HB 502 – Expanded “Trigger Man” Law, which allows for capital punishment for “accomplices” of a crime.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 14, 2014 02:31PM

Her name is Cumstock?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 14, 2014 02:32PM

That's worse than Coochinelli.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 14, 2014 03:54PM

Barbara is by far the best choice in the primary. Nobody else in the race is remotely credible.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Chantilly Political Chick ()
Date: April 14, 2014 09:29PM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Barbara is by far the best choice in the primary.
> Nobody else in the race is remotely credible.


I am with Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Bill Kristol,
and John Bolton in supporting Barbara Comstock. All these men have all our best interests in mind, and they all know what's best for women.

I mean, they were all correct about the need to rush into a War with Iraq, so, these smart men, who support Barbara Comstock, are my moral compass.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Fiscal Conservative ()
Date: April 14, 2014 09:34PM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Barbara is by far the best choice in the primary.
> Nobody else in the race is remotely credible.

Seriously, maybe you can shed some light on the thought process in VA GOP HQ.

Why does the "best choice" have to be a friend of social extremist Penny Nance, a transvaginal ultrasound supporter, willing to spend state funds defending a gay marriage ban, and self processed ditto head? Nevermind her questionable ethics from relationships with contractors.

How come everyone's "plan", beyond their neatly articulated social agenda, appears to just be "be against Obama"?

This area has been trending Dem for 6 years now, and the state GOP can't dig up a good moderate candidate? Someone who ditches the Christian social warrior agenda for some sound fiscal responsibility and libertarian approach to religion and social aspects?

Instead we get a number of new levels of crazy, right after kicking Cuccinelli to the curb. One mailer I got pointed out the guy has 12 kids. Why do I care how many kids he has?

I want someone who can put together a smart budget that can curb spending with bipartisan support, something Ryan and Co. continually fail to do. Why can't that person be the next rep from the 10th? No, apparently gay marriage is more important.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: doubt ()
Date: April 14, 2014 09:38PM

RE: BrianSchoeneman

So how can you justify supporting someone who voted for Obama in the primary? Even though it has been PROVEN that she is LYING about participating in Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos?!?!?

Look, I didn't like operation chaos, and I didn't participate it in– but to LIE about being a part of it as part of a coverup of why she voted for OBAMA?!?! That's just too much for me.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 14, 2014 11:49PM

Fiscal Conservative Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Barbara is by far the best choice in the
> primary.
> > Nobody else in the race is remotely credible.
>
> Seriously, maybe you can shed some light on the
> thought process in VA GOP HQ.
>
> Why does the "best choice" have to be a friend of
> social extremist Penny Nance, a transvaginal
> ultrasound supporter, willing to spend state funds
> defending a gay marriage ban, and self processed
> ditto head? Nevermind her questionable ethics from
> relationships with contractors.
>
> How come everyone's "plan", beyond their neatly
> articulated social agenda, appears to just be "be
> against Obama"?
>
> This area has been trending Dem for 6 years now,
> and the state GOP can't dig up a good moderate
> candidate? Someone who ditches the Christian
> social warrior agenda for some sound fiscal
> responsibility and libertarian approach to
> religion and social aspects?
>
> Instead we get a number of new levels of crazy,
> right after kicking Cuccinelli to the curb. One
> mailer I got pointed out the guy has 12 kids. Why
> do I care how many kids he has?
>
> I want someone who can put together a smart budget
> that can curb spending with bipartisan support,
> something Ryan and Co. continually fail to do. Why
> can't that person be the next rep from the 10th?
> No, apparently gay marriage is more important.

The decision of who should run for Congress wasn't made in RPV headquarters. It was made by the candidates who chose to run.

It sounds like you want somebody like me, which I appreciate. At the same time, realize that somebody like me is going to have a hard time winning a convention or a primary for Congress given that interparty contests are generally about who the base likes the best - and that means talking about social issues, unfortunately.

The good things about Barbara Comstock, and I've worked with her for years, is that she's an effective legislator who can get things accomplished. She's not going to be another culture warrior in the House. I wouldn't be surprised if she's not in the leadership in a few years.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 14, 2014 11:52PM

doubt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RE: BrianSchoeneman
>
> So how can you justify supporting someone who
> voted for Obama in the primary? Even though it has
> been PROVEN that she is LYING about participating
> in Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos?!?!?
>
> Look, I didn't like operation chaos, and I didn't
> participate it in– but to LIE about being a part
> of it as part of a coverup of why she voted for
> OBAMA?!?! That's just too much for me.

Who cares? Obama won the Democratic primary in Virginia by a ridiculous number, so it's not like she cast the deciding vote for him.

Republicans crossing over and voting in Democratic primaries happens frequently. As long as we've got open primaries in Virginia, it's going to happen. That's one of the reasons why I've been in favor of party registration.

I don't think she was lying about Operation Chaos, either - it's not as if the idea of crossing over never would have occurred to anybody if Rush Limbaugh hadn't talked about it. It was six years ago now, so I can understand how memories get blurred.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Schoeneman=LIAR ()
Date: April 14, 2014 11:59PM

Just more lies from the propaganda wing of the blogosphere: ie- Bearing Drift-

THE WASHINGTON TIMES!!! Said she was lying- Operation Chaos was to vote for HILLARY! Not OBAMA! Operation chaos didn't even start until AFTER the Virginia primary!!!

See this- Washington Times:

Delegate Barbara J. Comstock’s congressional campaign attempted to stiff-arm reports Monday that she voted for Barack Obama in Virginia’s 2008 Democratic primary by claiming it was part of a conservative bid to affect the Democratic presidential primaries six years ago.

The campaign defended the vote for Mr. Obama by arguing that it was part of Operation Chaos, a movement spearheaded by conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh in late February 2008 as Mr. Obama’s campaign was picking up steam and had won several consecutive primaries over Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Fairfax Republican “had participated in Rush Limbaugh’s 2008 ‘Operation Chaos’ to keep the Democrat primary going and nominate who she thought was the weakest candidate who Republican John McCain could beat,” campaign manager Susan Falconer said in a statement.

The movement, however, was originally meant to ensure Mr. Obama got “bloodied up” politically, Mr. Limbaugh told Fox News in May 2008 as Mr. Obama was on the cusp of securing the nomination.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 12:13AM

What lies? I'm explaining why it doesn't matter.

So what if Operation Chaos was to vote for Hillary? Crossing over and voting in the Dem primary was something a lot of folks have done in the past. It's not a big deal. It's not like that vote somehow made the difference in who was going to be the Democratic nominee.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Schoeneman=LIAR ()
Date: April 15, 2014 01:45AM

RE: BrianSchoeneman: So it makes no difference that Comstock lied about her intentions- just that it didn't make no difference?!?!

Okay, I get it- you just don't care that Comstock VOTED FOR OBAMA!!! She said so in the Washington Times. Sure- That doesn't matter at all. IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY!!!

Comstock is, as been proven, a LIAR. Its too easy. That's why you don't get it.

I'll be voting for somebody that isn't flacking for OBAMA and COMSTOCK. Thanks Brian!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Leave Brian Alone ()
Date: April 15, 2014 01:49AM

Anyone who criticizes Brian Schoeneman needs to remember, he's the only one from his party that actually interacts with the "common man" here on Fairfax Underground. That being said, I am no fan of the Republicans or the Democrats, but I wish there were more Republicans like Brian. Then I might vote more often for them.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Transparency ()
Date: April 15, 2014 07:09AM

Brian is a grandstander who desperately seeks attention from others to validate his existence.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 07:33AM

Schoeneman=LIAR Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> RE: BrianSchoeneman: So it makes no difference
> that Comstock lied about her intentions- just that
> it didn't make no difference?!?!
>
> Okay, I get it- you just don't care that Comstock
> VOTED FOR OBAMA!!! She said so in the Washington
> Times. Sure- That doesn't matter at all. IN THE
> REPUBLICAN PRIMARY!!!
>
> Comstock is, as been proven, a LIAR. Its too easy.
> That's why you don't get it.
>
> I'll be voting for somebody that isn't flacking
> for OBAMA and COMSTOCK. Thanks Brian!

Again, so what? Barbara isn't flacking for Obama. It was a vote in a primary six years ago that didn't matter.

You guys need to chill out.

As for being a grandstander, I'm a politician - you know any who aren't grandstanders? It's part of the job.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Brian Supporter ()
Date: April 15, 2014 08:52AM

Hey Brian, generally I'm a big fan of yours, but this is a bit of a stretch-

1. Who did you vote for in the 2008 Democrat primary?

2. Do you approve of Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos?"

3. Why aren't you running for Congress?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 09:25AM

1. I honestly can't remember. I did cross over but I think I voted for Hillary. It's been a while.

2. Sure. As long as the folks in Richmond refuse to give us party registration so we can get actual, closed primaries for nominating folks, this is a pretty standard tactic. I think I also crossed over when I lived in Alexandria to vote against Jim Moran in the 8th.

3. I need more experience, and my son is too young. I've got my hands full with my current thankless job, trading that for something else isn't on my horizon at this point.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 15, 2014 09:51AM

Yeah, vote in the Democratic Primary for operation chaos while your party moves forward with Sarah Palin on the ticket.

Guess that operation chaos thing backfired. lol, she just went rogue lmao.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 09:58AM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah, vote in the Democratic Primary for operation
> chaos while your party moves forward with Sarah
> Palin on the ticket.
>
> Guess that operation chaos thing backfired. lol,
> she just went rogue lmao.

Palin wasn't chosen for the ticket until a couple of months later.

Operation Chaos didn't really fail, it just didn't really do much of anything. Obama was unstoppable in 2008.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: GOP politics 101 ()
Date: April 15, 2014 10:27AM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> 3. I need more experience

Just start yelling things like "Benghazi" or "the healthcare debacle". That's all the experience you need to be recognized as a future leader of the American conservative movement.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Newt ()
Date: April 15, 2014 10:33AM

GOP politics 101 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > 3. I need more experience
>
> Just start yelling things like "Benghazi" or "the
> healthcare debacle". That's all the experience
> you need to be recognized as a future leader of
> the American conservative movement.


Don't forget "Reagan," "God," "9-11," and "Food stamps."

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: chantlly checking in ()
Date: April 15, 2014 10:47AM

I find it interesting Barbara Comstock has no campaign phone number on her website available to the common folk.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 10:55AM

I don't find that interesting at all. Cheaper to not have to worry about phones and just do email.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Babs Somscock ()
Date: April 15, 2014 11:47AM

A loony social conservative running for office in NoVa? Really?

May as well put Eugene Delgaudio on the ticket.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Interesting ()
Date: April 15, 2014 11:48AM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't find that interesting at all. Cheaper to
> not have to worry about phones and just do email.


Sure, Brian. these corporate"conservatives" have a disdain for common people.

Boehner, during the budget crises simply installed a machine on his US Capitol published phone number that routed calls to a message that said something like "Because we are getting an overabundance of calls in support of our budget priorities, we have a backlog of calls now." and then, the phone system put you in purgatory.

I mean, seriously, Brian, why should the campaign talk to her possible constituents? All Delegate Comstock needs to do is go on WMAL and bash "Obamacare," Go on Fox News and talk about Benghazi, approve a fluff piece in the Washington Times, and speak at staged and controlled events around the district. This strategy will certainly let her know what is on the minds of people in her district.

There is no need to take phone calls or talk real issues.


Remember how well this type of strategy worked for Doug Hoffman in New York?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: RydellRoad ()
Date: April 15, 2014 02:14PM

Interesting thread last few days. I don't understand this obsession with left-wing TALKING POINTS/SPIN/STRAWMAN/RED HERRING needing to be the driving force behind who Republicans put forward as candidates.

Is politics about nothing other than figuring out which way the wind is blowing and then staking out your position? Or is it about what you really believe?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: RydellRoad ()
Date: April 15, 2014 02:21PM

And who cares who voted in Democrat primaries? I've voted in a number of Democrat primaries... and I'm a Marshall supporter.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 02:26PM

Interesting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I don't find that interesting at all. Cheaper
> to
> > not have to worry about phones and just do
> email.
>
>
> Sure, Brian. these corporate"conservatives" have
> a disdain for common people.
>
> Boehner, during the budget crises simply installed
> a machine on his US Capitol published phone
> number that routed calls to a message that said
> something like "Because we are getting an
> overabundance of calls in support of our budget
> priorities, we have a backlog of calls now." and
> then, the phone system put you in purgatory.
>
> I mean, seriously, Brian, why should the campaign
> talk to her possible constituents? All Delegate
> Comstock needs to do is go on WMAL and bash
> "Obamacare," Go on Fox News and talk about
> Benghazi, approve a fluff piece in the Washington
> Times, and speak at staged and controlled events
> around the district. This strategy will certainly
> let her know what is on the minds of people in her
> district.
>
> There is no need to take phone calls or talk real
> issues.
>
>
> Remember how well this type of strategy worked for
> Doug Hoffman in New York?

"Common people" don't have email? Or write letters?

Her campaign is talking to constituents constantly. She's been knocking doors for months now. She doesn't need a phone number on the website to talk to her constituents.

This is one of the more ridiculous criticisms I've heard lately.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Larry O'Connnor bats both ways ()
Date: April 15, 2014 07:46PM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I don't find that interesting at all. Cheaper
> > to
> > > not have to worry about phones and just do
> > email.
> >
> >
> > Sure, Brian. these corporate"conservatives"
> have
> > a disdain for common people.
> >
> > Boehner, during the budget crises simply
> installed
> > a machine on his US Capitol published phone
> > number that routed calls to a message that said
> > something like "Because we are getting an
> > overabundance of calls in support of our budget
> > priorities, we have a backlog of calls now."
> and
> > then, the phone system put you in purgatory.
> >
> > I mean, seriously, Brian, why should the
> campaign
> > talk to her possible constituents? All Delegate
> > Comstock needs to do is go on WMAL and bash
> > "Obamacare," Go on Fox News and talk about
> > Benghazi, approve a fluff piece in the
> Washington
> > Times, and speak at staged and controlled
> events
> > around the district. This strategy will
> certainly
> > let her know what is on the minds of people in
> her
> > district.
> >
> > There is no need to take phone calls or talk
> real
> > issues.
> >
> >
> > Remember how well this type of strategy worked
> for
> > Doug Hoffman in New York?
>
> "Common people" don't have email? Or write
> letters?
>
> Her campaign is talking to constituents
> constantly. She's been knocking doors for months
> now. She doesn't need a phone number on the
> website to talk to her constituents.
>
> This is one of the more ridiculous criticisms I've
> heard lately.

Then why, when she was on WMAL, did she talk repealing "Obamacare," IRS, and Benghazi? Does she rally think most of her her potential constituents are government hating, Obama despising, freedom fighters?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Debbie Downer Democrat XDD ()
Date: April 15, 2014 08:00PM

coco for cocopuffs Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Haha! San Hannity and Mark Levin both endorsed
> Barbara Comstock. Those endorsements are I need
> to justify voting for John Foust.
>
>
> Is Sarah Palin's endorsement far behind?


It seems like your mind was made up even before seeing this thread. With this year's budget and real estate taxes, Mr. Foust voted for an 8.5% tax increase on real estate. If he's that reckless with the money of Fairfax residents, how will he be for the 10th District? He'll be among clowns - Gerry Connolly and whoever replaces Jim Moran in the 8th.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Tyson's Tycoon ()
Date: April 15, 2014 08:08PM

Within Tysons Corner. With the new Metro stops, and all the new massive infrastructure investments inside Tysons Corner, those property values are going through the roof.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 15, 2014 09:52PM

Larry O'Connnor bats both ways Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Then why, when she was on WMAL, did she talk
> repealing "Obamacare," IRS, and Benghazi? Does
> she rally think most of her her potential
> constituents are government hating, Obama
> despising, freedom fighters?

She's got to win the firehouse primary first.

Yes, most of the folks who vote in the firehouse primary are concerned about repealing Obamacare, the IRS and Benghazi.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: X Republican ()
Date: April 16, 2014 11:11AM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Larry O'Connnor bats both ways Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Then why, when she was on WMAL, did she talk
> > repealing "Obamacare," IRS, and Benghazi? Does
> > she rally think most of her her potential
> > constituents are government hating, Obama
> > despising, freedom fighters?
>
> She's got to win the firehouse primary first.
>
> Yes, most of the folks who vote in the firehouse
> primary are concerned about repealing Obamacare,
> the IRS and Benghazi.

So, what you are saying is you want and see the firehouse primary to be restricting by design, not expanding by design.

Got it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 16, 2014 12:20PM

I'm in favor of regular primaries for all nominating processes. A firehouse primary is better than a convention or mass meeting, but not as good as a regular primary.

What I'm saying is that your average inter-party race is going to play to the base of the party, and that base (at least in the 10th) cares about things like Obamacare, Benghazi and the IRS.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 16, 2014 12:45PM

Benghazi was a terror attack in the African desert, the IRS was a logical tax exemption analysis of anti government, anti tax, political organizations, that denied being political organizations to dodge taxes. The Tea Party isn't political lol, they got picked on and shouldn't pay taxes or its supposedely a scandal?

And what was the last Obama Care thing again. Oh yeah, old news.That dog won't hunt. That battle is over. If you don't know by now that Obama Care is settled law and ever expanding and that Republicans are incapable of governing at a level to repeal or replace it.

You're in for some disapointment.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/16/2014 12:47PM by Gerrymanderer2.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: RydellRoad ()
Date: April 16, 2014 01:15PM

Benghazi was a terror attack? Since when? It was sold during the election season solely as a direct response to a anti-Mohammed YouTube video.

IRS - if nothing there don't understand why the IRS was holding press conference to APOLOGIZE.

Obamacare - I have 2 brothers that had their insurance policies cancelled thanks to ACA. The stress of dealing with that for a couple of months was upsetting - I wouldn't underestimate how pissed off people are about that.

But in the end you are partly correct - the media completely ignores anything even slightly anti-Obama/Democrat so sure these tend to be one party issues.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: get it right ()
Date: April 16, 2014 01:38PM

RydellRoad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Benghazi was a terror attack? Since when? It was
> sold during the election season solely as a direct
> response to a anti-Mohammed YouTube video.
>
> IRS - if nothing there don't understand why the
> IRS was holding press conference to APOLOGIZE.
>
> Obamacare - I have 2 brothers that had their
> insurance policies cancelled thanks to ACA. The
> stress of dealing with that for a couple of months
> was upsetting - I wouldn't underestimate how
> pissed off people are about that.
>



Nobody had the insurance "cancelled," that is a poor talking point. They may have had their insurance beefed up to comply with the law, and had higher rates, but their policies were not "cancelled."

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: RydellRoad ()
Date: April 16, 2014 05:19PM

get it right Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Nobody had the insurance "cancelled," that is a
> poor talking point. They may have had their
> insurance beefed up to comply with the law, and
> had higher rates, but their policies were not
> "cancelled."

You have absolutely no clue at all. None. Both of them were advised in either October or November that their policy's were being discontinued at the end of 2013. Yes, their insurance companies offered them ACA compliant policies but they had a much higher deductible + about 10K per year more than their existing plan. I guess if you want to quibble over semantics the plans were discontinued not cancelled.

So the only choice was to conduct a lengthy search with an insurance broker to try to figure out their options. The govt. website at that time was shambles and unworkable. They eventually figured out that the govt. had 4 plans - all with larger deductibles than they currently had. The premiums might have been lower but with the deductibles and co-pay they found them comparatively unaffordable.

When you are a self-employed small business person with a decent size family this ACA is a kick in the nuts. And FYI - in the next couple of years we are all going to get a hell of an increase in premiums via our employer plans - so get ready folks.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: notbrianschoeneman ()
Date: April 17, 2014 03:21PM

And you Brian, in all of your infinite smug wisdom, understand that repealing Obamacare is basically impossible, the IRS conspiracy is part of a long history of John Birtch Society Republicans not wanting to pay their taxes, and Benghazi was a tragedy cynically hyped by GOP spin-masters because Hillary Clinton is tangentially related to it.

You know all that? Right?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: newgatedenizen ()
Date: April 17, 2014 07:19PM

get it right Wrote:

> Nobody had the insurance "cancelled," that is a
> poor talking point. They may have had their
> insurance beefed up to comply with the law, and
> had higher rates, but their policies were not
> "cancelled."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jywc3c1MYUw

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 18, 2014 12:00AM

notbrianschoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And you Brian, in all of your infinite smug
> wisdom, understand that repealing Obamacare is
> basically impossible, the IRS conspiracy is part
> of a long history of John Birtch Society
> Republicans not wanting to pay their taxes, and
> Benghazi was a tragedy cynically hyped by GOP
> spin-masters because Hillary Clinton is
> tangentially related to it.
>
> You know all that? Right?

What I know is that Obamacare is not working and needs a major overhaul. The IRS issue has undermined public belief in the non-political nature of how the IRS is supposed to operate. Benghazi has demonstrated why it's not always a good idea to put out unconfirmed and poorly researched information, especially when you are dealing with situations that have led to people losing their lives. All of these issues are legitimate, even if I believe that there are other things we need to be talking about, like jobs and the economy.

I'm not being smug. I'm just explaining my perspective.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/18/2014 12:01AM by BrianSchoeneman.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: oh oh ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:48AM

BrianSchoeneman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> notbrianschoeneman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And you Brian, in all of your infinite smug
> > wisdom, understand that repealing Obamacare is
> > basically impossible, the IRS conspiracy is
> part
> > of a long history of John Birtch Society
> > Republicans not wanting to pay their taxes, and
> > Benghazi was a tragedy cynically hyped by GOP
> > spin-masters because Hillary Clinton is
> > tangentially related to it.
> >
> > You know all that? Right?
>
> What I know is that Obamacare is not working and
> needs a major overhaul. The IRS issue has
> undermined public belief in the non-political
> nature of how the IRS is supposed to operate.
> Benghazi has demonstrated why it's not always a
> good idea to put out unconfirmed and poorly
> researched information, especially when you are
> dealing with situations that have led to people
> losing their lives. All of these issues are
> legitimate, even if I believe that there are other
> things we need to be talking about, like jobs and
> the economy.
>
> I'm not being smug. I'm just explaining my
> perspective.

Keep watching Fox News, Brain, What do you think of the Sean Hannity suspension, yesterday?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 08:09AM

Sean Hannity suspension? From Fox? Over the ranch reporting, now that has been just plain reckless. Roger Ailes wants to see if he can start an armed resistance. It's getting nuts.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: BrianSchoeneman ()
Date: April 18, 2014 09:05AM

oh oh Wrote:

> Keep watching Fox News, Brain, What do you think
> of the Sean Hannity suspension, yesterday?

I don't really watch Fox News, and I'm not a Hannity listener.

When I do watch cable news, I watch MSNBC in the morning before they go into insane mode around noon.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Faux News ()
Date: April 18, 2014 10:06AM

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sean Hannity suspension? From Fox? Over the
> ranch reporting, now that has been just plain
> reckless. Roger Ailes wants to see if he can
> start an armed resistance. It's getting nuts.


Yes, Hannity's suspension was for at least for one day, yesterday, to get a little of the heat off. They did the same thing with Megyn Kelly after the "Santa Claus are Jesus are just White" fiasco. It is typical with Fox News-when their hosts cross the line, and get caught, they just send in a sub for a day or two, and then downplay the infraction after the thing cools down a little.

What Hannity did was intentionally reckless, and dangerous, and he stayed the course throughout the program spreading rumor and misinformation. It appears, he did this to incite the stupid into resorting to gun violence. I think Roger Ailes actually agreed with his friend, and they are friends, Rachel Maddow, how reckless Sean was, and pulled him off the air to do some damage control.

The fact that Barbara Comstock accepted and touted this dangerous man's endorsement, and has not now publicly come out and condemned what he said and did is beyond belief. I guess we now know what type of person she is-a partisan hack who is controlled by the conservative movement. Do we really want that type of person representing us in Congress? Brian, even you need to agree Barbara needs to distance herself from this dangerous man, and not embrace his endorsement.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:04PM

Sean Hannity was openly taking credit on Fox for caused an armed resistance to federal law enforcement officials. I'd that's an absolute first for national media or media altogether.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Gerrymanderer2 ()
Date: April 18, 2014 07:04PM

Sean Hannity was openly taking credit on Fox for causing an armed resistance to federal law enforcement officials. I'd that's an absolute first for national media or media altogether.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: world wide pants ()
Date: April 22, 2014 07:32AM

Jon Stewart last night condemned Sean Hannity for having a double standard-if you are old, White, and hate the Federal Government, you are OK in Sean's book, and you can break the law. If you are non-White, young, and question private business, you are a felon in Sean's book.

Barbara Comstock needs to condemn Hannnity, and remove his endorsement from her website. O

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: Loudoun Catholic mom of two ()
Date: April 22, 2014 10:05AM

Sean Hannity just called a nun a "Communist" because she argued against Paul Ryan's budget. A nun! You don't mess with nuns, Sean. They have devoted their lives to helping the misfortunate.

Couple this absurdity with Hannity's "respect" for Cliven Bundy, and you see Sean Hannity is a despicable and deranged individual who only has the wealthiest people's best interest in mind. HAnnity will lie, misinform, cheat, and slander trying to get his way.

Amazingly, Barbara Comstock still has Hannity's endorsement on her website.

Shame on you Barbara Comstock for haplessly living in the "conservative bubble," and thinking the good people of the 10th district are conservatively misinformed and myopic, like you have demonstrated to be.

The more I read about Barbara Comstock, the further I am pulling away from the Virginia GOP.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: WingNut ()
Date: April 22, 2014 10:06AM

There are some communists and socialist in the Catholic clergy, Google LIBERATION THEOLOGY.


idontlikebeingrightaboutshitlikethisbutiam



Edited 21 time(s). Last edit at 5/31/1967 05:57AM by WingNut.

Last edit at 11/30/2015 01:37PM Last edit at 5/14/2015 03:52PM Last edit at 1/28/2014 05:57AM Last edit at 11/29/2015 01:10PM Last edit at 3/14/2011 11:52PM Last edit at 7/20/2012 04:07AM
Last edit at 6/29/2013 11:18PM Last edit at 3/19/2011 01:02PM Last edit at 3/26/2012 09:07PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: YACLF ()
Date: April 22, 2014 10:13AM

Faux News Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Sean Hannity suspension? From Fox? Over the
> > ranch reporting, now that has been just plain
> > reckless. Roger Ailes wants to see if he can
> > start an armed resistance. It's getting nuts.
>
>
> Yes, Hannity's suspension was for at least for one
> day, yesterday, to get a little of the heat off.
> They did the same thing with Megyn Kelly after the
> "Santa Claus are Jesus are just White" fiasco.
> It is typical with Fox News-when their hosts cross
> the line, and get caught, they just send in a sub
> for a day or two, and then downplay the infraction
> after the thing cools down a little.
>
> What Hannity did was intentionally reckless, and
> dangerous, and he stayed the course throughout the
> program spreading rumor and misinformation. It
> appears, he did this to incite the stupid into
> resorting to gun violence. I think Roger Ailes
> actually agreed with his friend, and they are
> friends, Rachel Maddow, how reckless Sean was, and
> pulled him off the air to do some damage control.
>
> The fact that Barbara Comstock accepted and touted
> this dangerous man's endorsement, and has not now
> publicly come out and condemned what he said and
> did is beyond belief. I guess we now know what
> type of person she is-a partisan hack who is
> controlled by the conservative movement. Do we
> really want that type of person representing us in
> Congress? Brian, even you need to agree Barbara
> needs to distance herself from this dangerous man,
> and not embrace his endorsement.


^ Yet another complete Libtard fantasy. lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: rngy ()
Date: April 22, 2014 10:34AM

Loudoun Catholic mom of two Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sean Hannity just called a nun a "Communist"
> because she argued against Paul Ryan's budget. A
> nun! You don't mess with nuns, Sean. They have
> devoted their lives to helping the misfortunate.

That's what she gets for doing push ups in the cucumber patch.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: voted for her ()
Date: May 06, 2014 09:11AM

i will vote for her

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Conservatives for Comstock
Posted by: VOTE FOR HER ()
Date: May 06, 2014 12:42PM

VOE

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **     **  **      **   ******   **    ** 
    **     **     **  **  **  **  **    **  **   **  
    **     **     **  **  **  **  **        **  **   
    **     *********  **  **  **  **        *****    
    **     **     **  **  **  **  **        **  **   
    **     **     **  **  **  **  **    **  **   **  
    **     **     **   ***  ***    ******   **    ** 
This forum powered by Phorum.