Finally, modern voting is here in Fairfax County! Help save the planet, save time and save fuel by voting from home.

Using Twitter of Facebook, use the following to register your vote:

#OneVoteForHillaryClinton

We can now allow even those unable to leave the house to vote. Pass the word, let's get that Democratic Vote Out!

*Only one vote per individual will be counted

Modern Voting Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Finally, modern voting is here in Fairfax County!
> Help save the planet, save time and save fuel by
> voting from home.
>
> Using Twitter of Facebook, use the following to
> register your vote:
>
> #OneVoteForHillaryClinton
>
> We can now allow even those unable to leave the
> house to vote. Pass the word, let's get that
> Democratic Vote Out!
>
> *Only one vote per individual will be counted

It'll never work, 'tard.

Trump-tards!

LoLz!

I think you really overestimate the baseline intelligence of the core of the democratic party vote....

BellCurve Smarts Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think you really overestimate the baseline
> intelligence of the core of the democratic party
> vote....

Ummm... No.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/06/study-finds-democrats-bigger-vocabularies-grammar-republicans.html

Ummm... No. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BellCurve Smarts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think you really overestimate the baseline
> > intelligence of the core of the democratic
> party
> > vote....
>
> Ummm... No.
>
> http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/06/study-finds
> -democrats-bigger-vocabularies-grammar-republicans
> .html


^ Actually believes that. lol

Ummm... No. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BellCurve Smarts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think you really overestimate the baseline
> > intelligence of the core of the democratic
> party
> > vote....
>
> Ummm... No.
>
> http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/06/study-finds
> -democrats-bigger-vocabularies-grammar-republicans
> .html


Just as I do not quote Fox News to defend my arguments, you might also check your sources. But then again, that would require a modicum of free thought and effort.....so you'll be happy to stick with your party line. You probably also believe Hillary did no wrong with her server setup.

Ummm... No. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BellCurve Smarts Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think you really overestimate the baseline
> > intelligence of the core of the democratic
> party
> > vote....
>
> Ummm... No.
>
> http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/06/study-finds
> -democrats-bigger-vocabularies-grammar-republicans
> .html

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/03/10/pew-makes-it-official-republicans-are-smarter-than-democrats-54686

"Republicans are actually smarter than Democrats.

At least, that’s what a study by the Pew Research Center tells us.

That Republicans are more knowledgeable is not all that surprising to anyone paying attention. There is a reason “low-information voters” vote Democrat."

And this: http://therightstuff.biz/2014/11/05/republicans-are-smarter-than-democrats/

"It isn’t surprising that the most ardent republicans and democrats are the smartest and dumbest of all the groups included in this study. A significant part of the republican world view is accepting social inequality as okay. This is a lot easier to do if you are the kind of person that will end up on top in an unequal world. If you are dumb on the other hand, and there fore are more likely to be the kind of person who land on the bottom of an unequal world, then you have more reason to support social equality. Consistent with this explanation is the fact that liberalism has been linked with low self esteem (3) and causing people to think poorly of themselves has been shown to decrease their tolerance for social inequality (4)."

Need a hanky? Or maybe a hug?

Facts to Fit Your Conclusion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Need a hanky? Or maybe a hug?

Ummm... No.

just facts:

Attachments:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201311/who-s-smarter-republicans-and-democrats-in-congress

ShakingMyHead Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Just as I do not quote Fox News to defend my
> arguments, you might also check your sources. But
> then again, that would require a modicum of free
> thought and effort.....so you'll be happy to stick
> with your party line. You probably also believe
> Hillary did no wrong with her server setup.


FoxNews is pretty much in the tank for Hillary in this election. Only the morning show and Hannity continue to openly support Trump. The rest of their shows are mildly or openly pro-Hillary. The Murdochs are globalists and Rupert supported Hillary in 2008, holding fundraisers for her. His sons are typical silver-spoon libtards who's daddy gave them a multi-billion dollar empire to run. FoxNews is done after this election. Their ratings are down almost 20% in key demographics and Megyn Kelly is now losing to Rachel Maddcow consistently. O'Reilly has lost 12% of his audience since the spring.

Switch to OAN if you want real news. They cover the stories, broadcast all speeches of the candidates in full.

Screw FNC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Switch to OAN if you want real news. They cover
> the stories, broadcast all speeches of the
> candidates in full.


They also have informative programming on how to raise an emergency "crisis garden" in your backyard for when the govt collapses, and how to stop federal law enforcement from remote sensing the amount of currency in your wallet.

Thanks! I was worried about getting all the folks in my project apartment block into the van. I'll ensure they all have their Twitter accounts established, this is awesome news for the many invalids and homeless I drag to the polls every four years!

Fuck you

Screw FNC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ShakingMyHead Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Just as I do not quote Fox News to defend my
> > arguments, you might also check your sources.
> But
> > then again, that would require a modicum of
> free
> > thought and effort.....so you'll be happy to
> stick
> > with your party line. You probably also
> believe
> > Hillary did no wrong with her server setup.
>
>
> FoxNews is pretty much in the tank for Hillary in
> this election. Only the morning show and Hannity
> continue to openly support Trump. The rest of
> their shows are mildly or openly pro-Hillary. The
> Murdochs are globalists and Rupert supported
> Hillary in 2008, holding fundraisers for her. His
> sons are typical silver-spoon libtards who's daddy
> gave them a multi-billion dollar empire to run.
> FoxNews is done after this election. Their
> ratings are down almost 20% in key demographics
> and Megyn Kelly is now losing to Rachel Maddcow
> consistently. O'Reilly has lost 12% of his
> audience since the spring.
>
> Switch to OAN if you want real news. They cover
> the stories, broadcast all speeches of the
> candidates in full.

I stopped watching Fox a long time ago when I got sick of looking at them. OAN I watch when I watch. I get Washington Post headlines emailed to me. Our media is very disappointing.

Ererrf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fuck you


Ha! Brilliant! So succinct yet profound! Clearly the product of an educated and well informed mind...able to boil it all down so quickly! Did you spend the entire 13 hours since this post was made thinking up your response?

Well, sir, you are a delight! Please celebrate your witty retort with a snack! Perhaps you could.....eat a bag of dicks? Bon appetite!

Tried casting my vote and look what I caught
Attachments: