ED/LD School Being Sued For Pornography Charges
Date: December 26, 2008 02:54PM
OAK VALLEY CENTER, ED/LD SCHOOL IN FAIRFAX, VA. BEING SUED FOR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST GAYS AND SENDING PORNOGRAPHY TO IT'S STAFF...
This school is charging it's students/parents $40,000 a year to send them to this school, and on the students time, is sending out porn to it's staff, so just what are the teachers teaching at this school if they are all so busy looking at porn?
This is just one more example of how the school system is robbing the parents of their hard earned money and not taking the education of their children seriously!!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
__________________________________________
WILLIAM ANDREW LEWIS,
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
OAK VALLEY CENTER, INC. )
11230 Waples Mill Road )
Suite 100 )
Fairfax, Virginia 22030 )
) Civil Action No. _________
)
Serve Resident Agent: )
)
Dr. Jaren Van den Heuvel )
3952 Pender Drive )
Suite 105 )
Fairfax, Virginia 22030 )
)
and )
)
DR. JAREN VAN DEN HEUVEL )
11446 Bronzedale Drive )
Oakton, Virginia 22124 )
)
and )
)
ANDREW HALL )
14203 Morning Dove Lane )
Apartment I )
Centreville, Virginia 20121 )
)
Defendants. )
)
__________________________________________
CIVIL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1. Drew Lewis, the plaintiff in this action, was employed at Oak Valley Center for eight months in 2008. During that time, Defendant Hall engaged in abusive and intolerable harassment of Mr. Lewis because of his sex that altered the terms and conditions of his employment. Defendant Jaren Van den Heuvel and Defendant Oak Valley Center knew of the harassment, participated in it, and failed to prevent, stop, or correct it. Because of the intolerable work environment that the Defendants created, Mr. Lewis was forced to resign his employment. The Defendants’ actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
2. Among other acts, Defendant Hall harassed Mr. Lewis by transmitting numerous pornographic and obscene images from his cellular phone to Mr. Lewis’ cellular phone. Defendant Hall’s actions, which were done within the scope of his employment, violated the Virginia Computer Crimes Act, Va. Code Ann. §18.2-152 et seq.