Re: West Springfield High arrest [3 arrested in child pornography case]
Posted by:
URA DUMBASS
()
Date: February 16, 2013 01:01AM
To: James and clueless parents Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This hearing was open to the public and the press.
> If you don't believe the info, see if you can get
> a transcript. Regardless of what you believe, the
> prosecuting and defense attorneys, and the judge,
> all have the evidence. I think the Fairfax County
> School Board should ask for proof of when the
> arrest warrant was signed, as well as the score
> sheet, and discuss with FCPD/Intake Officer on the
> criteria used to justify the detention order. The
> boys shouldn't have been arrested, and especially
> at the school. My guess, clueless parents, is
> that theft and vandalism score high enough to get
> a detention order. In despite what you think,
> James, the judge knows more than you.
>
> The school didn't hide anything; they don't have
> jurisdiction to investigate alleged activity that
> occurs off of school grounds.
>
> Obviously the kids didn't know the laws about
> child pornography, just like the assistant
> principle in Loudon County didn't know that law
> when he was asked to investigate similar activity
> at his school, and was subsequently charged with
> possession of child pornography due to the photo
> he was told to store on his school computer as
> evidence that came from the investigation, and he
> had to spend $150,000 on lawyers fees to clear his
> name due to a radical prosecutor. Otherwise, he
> would've been a registered sex offender. Many
> adults don't even understand the sodomy law in
> Virginia; if you're not married, and engage in
> oral, vaginal, or anal sex, you can be prosecuted
> (oral and anal sex are felonies in Virginia, even
> if you are married). So, James and clueless
> parents, if you ever engage in those activities,
> and someone accuses you of doing such, be prepared
> to hire a lawyer, cause you will be charged with a
> felony.
>
> Also, because so many young people use technology
> and share private info with each other, and
> because many states have not adjusted their laws
> and kids are getting into lots of trouble for
> child pornography when in fact it's sexting, law
> makers in states like New York, Connecticut, Utah,
> Vermont, Ohio, etc. have made efforts to separate
> sexting from child pornography. I wouldn't be
> surprised if the U.S. Supreme Court has to make a
> ruling on the difference between sexting and child
> pornography, just like they did with striking down
> the sodomy law.
"This hearing was open to the public and the press. If you don't believe the info, see if you can get a transcript"
I call BULL SHIT. Hearings in the juvenile and domestic relations court are held in CLOSED courtooms, if you're not part of the case, you get kicked out, including media. State law. Along those lines, you won't get a FOIA copy of the transcripts. What you do have here is a Parent of one of the kids trying to sway public opinion. Little shit stain sat in juvenile hall over the weekend? Boo Hoo.
Not kiddie porn? Some guy in Walla Walla Washington jerking off to it thinks it is. What you nimrods don't understand is when you upload images/videos to the internet, it's out there FOREVER. Scumbags in Belarus data mine Twitter, photo sharing, facebook stickam etc and the like for kiddie porn to host on their servers and monetize it. Even if it's up for a second, it could be copied.