Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Scores
()
Date: August 29, 2013 11:50PM
Anybody got the Final scores for games? Mostly interested in the Centreville/WestPo game and the shoot out that turned out to be Lee/Edison.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Cvillebacker
()
Date: August 30, 2013 12:52AM
Football Fever Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquisitive One. I am right there with you. Lots
> of talent but we have to see how well they come
> together as a team and not listen to the hype.
> Two years ago, with all of that CVille talent,
> they beat Westpo 49-10 and a young Caleb
> Henderson. That was a team. Outside of Ekanmem,
> no superstars, but they relied on each other.
>
> Last year's WePo team beat a very injured CVIlle
> team. I think 3 or 4 started were hurt prior or
> in that game and Hadoock was trying to fill the
> gaps. We were up 20-10 at halftime and ran out of
> steam.
>
> If we can stop the big plays that Hylton had, we
> should do fine
Nothing to worry about folks. Centreville turned this game into a joke early and often. 44-0 at half with Scott Walter hitting Charles Tutt for 2 long touchdown passes and AJ Turner for another. Chase Heiner ran for a TD along with Xavier Nickens-Yzer and a defensive fumble recovery and a safety equal the half time score and ball game. The defense held West Pot and Demornay to nothing until the 4th quarter in the last seconds and the starters laughing on the sidelines gave a long TD pass to make it 51-7. Total Beat down.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquisitive One. I am right there with you. Lots
> of talent but we have to see how well they come
> together as a team and not listen to the hype.
> Two years ago, with all of that CVille talent,
> they beat Westpo 49-10 and a young Caleb
> Henderson. That was a team. Outside of Ekanmem,
> no superstars, but they relied on each other.
>
> Last year's WePo team beat a very injured CVIlle
> team. I think 3 or 4 started were hurt prior or
> in that game and Hadoock was trying to fill the
> gaps. We were up 20-10 at halftime and ran out of
> steam.
>
> If we can stop the big plays that Hylton had, we
> should do fine
Nothing to worry about folks. Centreville turned this game into a joke early and often. 44-0 at half with Scott Walter hitting Charles Tutt for 2 long touchdown passes and AJ Turner for another. Chase Heiner ran for a TD along with Xavier Nickens-Yzer and a defensive fumble recovery and a safety equal the half time score and ball game. The defense held West Pot and Demornay to nothing until the 4th quarter in the last seconds and the starters laughing on the sidelines gave a long TD pass to make it 51-7. Total Beat down.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
DanTheMan
()
Date: August 30, 2013 01:33AM
Cville won 51-0
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
read deal cville
()
Date: August 30, 2013 07:43AM
cville 2013 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just feel sorry for anyone playing centreville
> this year. After what I saw them do to Hylton, all
> I can say is wow...
And West Potomac...
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just feel sorry for anyone playing centreville
> this year. After what I saw them do to Hylton, all
> I can say is wow...
And West Potomac...
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
LJS
()
Date: August 30, 2013 07:50AM
Centreville West Potomac 51-7
Coolidge Yorktown 0-49
Edison Lee 61-75
Fairfax W.T. Woodson 14-7
From the Washington Post.
Coolidge Yorktown 0-49
Edison Lee 61-75
Fairfax W.T. Woodson 14-7
From the Washington Post.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
FCPS EDUK8TR
()
Date: August 30, 2013 08:04AM
Lee 75 Edison 61? Holy cow!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
reasoning
()
Date: August 30, 2013 08:59AM
both teams suck
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Wildcat Fan
()
Date: August 30, 2013 09:33AM
Really....talent Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If they
> don't will 2 state titles Haddock should be
> embarrassed!!
Whether they win a state title or not, it is clear Haddock is one of the best coaches in the region if not the best... He has turned around that program and has them as strong as ever with much better opponents than the Wildcats had back in the good old days before 2000.
-------------------------------------------------------
> If they
> don't will 2 state titles Haddock should be
> embarrassed!!
Whether they win a state title or not, it is clear Haddock is one of the best coaches in the region if not the best... He has turned around that program and has them as strong as ever with much better opponents than the Wildcats had back in the good old days before 2000.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
DanTheMan
()
Date: August 30, 2013 12:21PM
CORRECTION: 51-7... still wow
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
RatedRKO
()
Date: August 30, 2013 12:29PM
So does the Lee-Edison game high scoring due to good explosive offenses or just downright terrible defense?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Nbs
()
Date: August 30, 2013 01:00PM
RatedRKO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So does the Lee-Edison game high scoring due to
> good explosive offenses or just downright terrible
> defense?
I think Lee has a couple electric players on offense, but nothing too special. Their defense however is terrible.
Edison scored most of their points in the 2nd half and late in the game, against many of Lee's backups. So I think Edison still sucks.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So does the Lee-Edison game high scoring due to
> good explosive offenses or just downright terrible
> defense?
I think Lee has a couple electric players on offense, but nothing too special. Their defense however is terrible.
Edison scored most of their points in the 2nd half and late in the game, against many of Lee's backups. So I think Edison still sucks.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Bulldawg
()
Date: August 30, 2013 02:13PM
"Where are the haters who said I was crazy for my Centreville score of 49 14?
Centreville will not lose all season. They will not even be in a close game all season. If they don't will 2 state titles Haddock should be embarrassed!!"
Don't sleep on Westfied.
The D will be great, the RB's will be great and playmakers on the outside. They need to replace the production they got from QB last year, but if their QB can manage the game, they are not an easy out for anyone----including C'Ville.
Centreville will not lose all season. They will not even be in a close game all season. If they don't will 2 state titles Haddock should be embarrassed!!"
Don't sleep on Westfied.
The D will be great, the RB's will be great and playmakers on the outside. They need to replace the production they got from QB last year, but if their QB can manage the game, they are not an easy out for anyone----including C'Ville.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Any scores?
()
Date: August 30, 2013 10:34PM
Someone say something.........
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Nostradamus
()
Date: August 30, 2013 10:37PM
TC Williams was crushing Oakton 30 something to 2 when I left in the 4th quarter. And the only reason Oakton scored a safety was because TC's QB inadvertently stepped out of the end zone.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
The ROck
()
Date: August 30, 2013 10:41PM
Welcome back to Coach Dan Meier:
Lake Braddock 38
Robinson 8
3rd Quarter
LOL
ROFLMAO
Meier's Rams are pussies without steroids.
Lake Braddock 38
Robinson 8
3rd Quarter
LOL
ROFLMAO
Meier's Rams are pussies without steroids.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Football Fever
()
Date: August 30, 2013 10:57PM
Was at the Westfield Game. Was 7-7 at the half and a combination of a 70 yd TD run on the first play of the second half and a 99 yd TD run after a long Hayfield drive and score basically put the game away
Lot of mistakes and fumbles by both teams but it hurt Hayfield more. Hayfield who has a scholarship QB Essentially stopped throwing in the second half
Lot of mistakes and fumbles by both teams but it hurt Hayfield more. Hayfield who has a scholarship QB Essentially stopped throwing in the second half
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
stallions
()
Date: August 30, 2013 10:59PM
Mount Vernon 7
South County 56
South County 56
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Bruins Bash
()
Date: August 30, 2013 11:05PM
Final:
Lake Braddock 38
Robinson 22
LB looks like the real deal...
Lake Braddock 38
Robinson 22
LB looks like the real deal...
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
newgatedenizen
()
Date: August 30, 2013 11:11PM
Football Fever Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Was at the Westfield Game. Was 7-7 at the half and
> a combination of a 70 yd TD run on the first play
> of the second half and a 99 yd TD run after a long
> Hayfield drive and score basically put the game
> away
>
> Lot of mistakes and fumbles by both teams but it
> hurt Hayfield more. Hayfield who has a
> scholarship QB Essentially stopped throwing in
> the second half
Hayfield played tough - they should win at least 6 games this year. Westfield's offense looked pretty inexperienced.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Was at the Westfield Game. Was 7-7 at the half and
> a combination of a 70 yd TD run on the first play
> of the second half and a 99 yd TD run after a long
> Hayfield drive and score basically put the game
> away
>
> Lot of mistakes and fumbles by both teams but it
> hurt Hayfield more. Hayfield who has a
> scholarship QB Essentially stopped throwing in
> the second half
Hayfield played tough - they should win at least 6 games this year. Westfield's offense looked pretty inexperienced.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
TheKicker
()
Date: August 31, 2013 10:10AM
Joe Wilson was hurt in the 2nd quarter and did not return. He is their whole team, and to be without him for any length of time is a huge blow for the Rams. I'm surprised Robinson even scored 14 points in the second half. Anyone know what he did?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Scores
()
Date: August 31, 2013 10:20AM
Centreville 51 @ West Potomac 7
Fairfax 14 @ Woodson 7
Edison 61 @ Lee 75
Coolidge (DC) 0 @ Yorktown 49
Lake Braddock 38 @ Robinson 22
Hayfield 13 @ Westfield 35
T.C. Williams 38 @ Oakton 2
Mount Vernon 7 @ South County 56
Fairfax 14 @ Woodson 7
Edison 61 @ Lee 75
Coolidge (DC) 0 @ Yorktown 49
Lake Braddock 38 @ Robinson 22
Hayfield 13 @ Westfield 35
T.C. Williams 38 @ Oakton 2
Mount Vernon 7 @ South County 56
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
NR Fanatic
()
Date: August 31, 2013 10:40AM
Lake Braddock was about two touchdowns better than Robinson. I know they were up 30, but a couple horrendous calls and a crazy play where an interception was fumbled into the hands of a receiver for a touchdown put Robinson in that situation. Robinson got a couple meaningless touchdowns late in the fourth which made the score pretty accurate.
Alexander and Sica are by far the best wide receiver duo in the region. Everyone knew about Alexander, but Sica was huge. Lake Braddock was bigger across the board it seemed like. They are going to be an incredibly difficult offense to stop with 3 FBS caliber players.
Robinson is not going to be good this year. They don’t have much of a passing game and teams should continue to key on Wilson. Year 1 with Meier though is a rebuild. I feel pretty confident saying they will probably be 4th in the Concorde this year. Centreville, Westfield, Chantilly, Robinson, Oakton, Herndon in that order. I am shocked at how bad Oakton is right now, they got drubbed last night and in both of their scrimmages. Honestly maybe Herndon finishes above them, I’ve heard they’ve gotten better but have not seen them.
Alexander and Sica are by far the best wide receiver duo in the region. Everyone knew about Alexander, but Sica was huge. Lake Braddock was bigger across the board it seemed like. They are going to be an incredibly difficult offense to stop with 3 FBS caliber players.
Robinson is not going to be good this year. They don’t have much of a passing game and teams should continue to key on Wilson. Year 1 with Meier though is a rebuild. I feel pretty confident saying they will probably be 4th in the Concorde this year. Centreville, Westfield, Chantilly, Robinson, Oakton, Herndon in that order. I am shocked at how bad Oakton is right now, they got drubbed last night and in both of their scrimmages. Honestly maybe Herndon finishes above them, I’ve heard they’ve gotten better but have not seen them.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Ram Fan
()
Date: August 31, 2013 11:03AM
You are not understanding why he came back, when you make statements like "year one with Meier is a rebuild." First of all he is only back for one year. He will be taking an admin job somewhere after this year. Secondly and most important, he believes there is no need for a rebuild. That is why he did not give Taylor any additional time to get them back on track. He believes the talent at Robinson now, along with his brilliant offensive mind and head coaching, can return Robinson to the glory years this season. At least he believed that till last night. This is not the 1990's, the game has evolved and changed and he is lost. It is a joke that he fired the last coach, took the job himself and then put that product on the field last night.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
NoNoSoCo
()
Date: August 31, 2013 11:10AM
Anybody at the South County game? Seen there score 56-7. Know they graduate Oren Burke so who they got? Are they anywhere close to 2011 Stallions? Or they just beat up on weak MV team?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
soco
()
Date: August 31, 2013 11:20AM
South County could've won that game with 80 or 90 points if they didn't put in backups and the clock didn't get run down in the second half. It was 49-7 at halftime.
Symmes is a good QB. The 2011 team was dominant on D. This team looks good on both sides. 7.5 sacks in the first half alone.
Mt Vernon only scored because their drive was extended after a bunch of sideline penalties on the staff
That said, who knows how they'll do against better teams
Symmes is a good QB. The 2011 team was dominant on D. This team looks good on both sides. 7.5 sacks in the first half alone.
Mt Vernon only scored because their drive was extended after a bunch of sideline penalties on the staff
That said, who knows how they'll do against better teams
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Spectator
()
Date: August 31, 2013 12:47PM
Meier was actually running the offense really well and they looked good until Wilson got hurt, and if it wasn't for the two fumbles in the first half it would have been a very close game. Btw Henderson was very inconsistent for a four star prospect and got lucky on a few td's. lb has no class!!! After receiving a punt they kicked the ball back to Robinson in a manner of "we're the best, you are pathetic".
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
LJS
()
Date: August 31, 2013 01:13PM
Wait, did LB punt back to Robinson on 1st down???
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Oh well
()
Date: August 31, 2013 04:07PM
5A schools in Fairfax County are cooked! The final four in this year's 5A might all be Loudoun schools, unless they have to play each other before getting that far.
Briar Woods destroyed a decent Brooke Point program, and Broad Run drove 4 hours to lay the wood to a physically talented Booker T. Washington team from the 757.
Then Woodgrove rolls it up on Freedom in their first 5A game, and Tuscarora beats a solid Kettle Run team in their place.
Oh, and Stone Bridge didn't even play. The balance of power has shifted. Stone Bridge is going to beat Braddock AND Westfield before playing the Little Sisters of the Poor that is known as their conference.
Briar Woods destroyed a decent Brooke Point program, and Broad Run drove 4 hours to lay the wood to a physically talented Booker T. Washington team from the 757.
Then Woodgrove rolls it up on Freedom in their first 5A game, and Tuscarora beats a solid Kettle Run team in their place.
Oh, and Stone Bridge didn't even play. The balance of power has shifted. Stone Bridge is going to beat Braddock AND Westfield before playing the Little Sisters of the Poor that is known as their conference.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Ram Booster
()
Date: August 31, 2013 04:30PM
Braddock simply outplayed Robinson tonight, I thought both teams played with class.
The punt you are referring too isnt used very much, but they were trying to score. Here is the rule:
Braddock tried a free kick/fair catch kick that allows a team that has just made a fair catch to attempt a free kick from the spot of the catch. The kick must be either a place kick or a drop kick, and if it passes over the uprights and of the defensive team's goal, three points is scored to the offensive team.
The punt you are referring too isnt used very much, but they were trying to score. Here is the rule:
Braddock tried a free kick/fair catch kick that allows a team that has just made a fair catch to attempt a free kick from the spot of the catch. The kick must be either a place kick or a drop kick, and if it passes over the uprights and of the defensive team's goal, three points is scored to the offensive team.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
TheKicker
()
Date: August 31, 2013 05:32PM
Oh well Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, and Stone Bridge didn't even play. The
> balance of power has shifted. Stone Bridge is
> going to beat Braddock AND Westfield before
> playing the Little Sisters of the Poor that is
> known as their conference.
I completely agree with you except that I don't think Stone Bridge will beat both Westfield and Braddock. I think Braddock will win by 7 or 10 and Westfield will lose by about that margin. Both of those games could easily go the other way, but I think they win one and lose one. I really agree that the 5A powers are in Loudoun but I think the 6A schools collectively are a little bit better.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, and Stone Bridge didn't even play. The
> balance of power has shifted. Stone Bridge is
> going to beat Braddock AND Westfield before
> playing the Little Sisters of the Poor that is
> known as their conference.
I completely agree with you except that I don't think Stone Bridge will beat both Westfield and Braddock. I think Braddock will win by 7 or 10 and Westfield will lose by about that margin. Both of those games could easily go the other way, but I think they win one and lose one. I really agree that the 5A powers are in Loudoun but I think the 6A schools collectively are a little bit better.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
concordekings
()
Date: August 31, 2013 07:41PM
RatedRKO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So does the Lee-Edison game high scoring due to
> good explosive offenses or just downright terrible
> defense?
yea...be ready this friday when chantilly shuts lee out and sends them back to the hood. keep running up scores against edison, lets see you try that shit friday.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So does the Lee-Edison game high scoring due to
> good explosive offenses or just downright terrible
> defense?
yea...be ready this friday when chantilly shuts lee out and sends them back to the hood. keep running up scores against edison, lets see you try that shit friday.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Horus
()
Date: August 31, 2013 07:54PM
So, anyone think Langley has a shot to beat Yorktown next friday?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
d.eaton
()
Date: August 31, 2013 09:31PM
Not with Howerton coaching.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Jonny
()
Date: August 31, 2013 10:48PM
Soco by the looks of it could go 10-0
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Jacky
()
Date: August 31, 2013 10:58PM
What about tc?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
HannesAdler27586
()
Date: August 31, 2013 11:31PM
My theory is that the Westfield bulldogs shall dominate the completion in this county. We beaten several rivals, examples would include Herndon High, South Lakes, Chantilly, and so on. I can go on and on about this, I can assure you folks that.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
observer2
()
Date: September 01, 2013 12:02AM
Did I just see a Concorde team fan just smack talk about Lee? Man, in the old days Concorde teams wouldn't even acknowledge their existence. I guess Lee is moving up in the world if they are getting hated on for beating a team they should be considered even with (Edison) by 14 points.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Hannes Adler is the Sofa King
()
Date: September 01, 2013 12:07AM
Westfield shall dominate rivals... then goes on to name Herndon and South Lakes.... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Langley has no shot to beat Yorktown. Poorly coached fast black athletes always beat poorly coached white future CEO's, politicians, and narcs/snitches.
TC's win looks real impressive now, but let's just see how bad Oakton truly is this year.
Stone Bridge will beat Braddock by at least two touchdowns.
Langley has no shot to beat Yorktown. Poorly coached fast black athletes always beat poorly coached white future CEO's, politicians, and narcs/snitches.
TC's win looks real impressive now, but let's just see how bad Oakton truly is this year.
Stone Bridge will beat Braddock by at least two touchdowns.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
HannesAdler27586
()
Date: September 01, 2013 12:15AM
Well, I don't play football. So yeah, fuck off.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
HannesAdler27586
()
Date: September 01, 2013 12:16AM
But to be fair, yeah oakton sucks at football.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
dan6676544
()
Date: September 01, 2013 02:36AM
^No, wakefield sucks at football lol.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Really...talent
()
Date: September 01, 2013 08:24AM
Oakton beat those Bulldogs you were hyping in the Regional Final last year. Westfield always a bridesmaid never a bride. You can win all the regular season games you like but if you can't win the big one then people will hate.
Oakton is not as good this season I agree. They will win games and they will make the playoffs. Look for them to right the ship this week at Madison. They will finish 6-4 5-5 which around here may be good enough to squeak in with quality power points.
Oakton is not as good this season I agree. They will win games and they will make the playoffs. Look for them to right the ship this week at Madison. They will finish 6-4 5-5 which around here may be good enough to squeak in with quality power points.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
WeWillSee
()
Date: September 01, 2013 10:59AM
We'll see how good TC is when they play Centreville Friday night. TC has some good atheletes, but I'd be surprised if they don't get blown away by Cville.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
NR Fanatic
()
Date: September 01, 2013 11:45AM
Really...talent Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oakton beat those Bulldogs you were hyping in the
> Regional Final last year. Westfield always a
> bridesmaid never a bride. You can win all the
> regular season games you like but if you can't win
> the big one then people will hate.
>
> Oakton is not as good this season I agree. They
> will win games and they will make the playoffs.
> Look for them to right the ship this week at
> Madison. They will finish 6-4 5-5 which around
> here may be good enough to squeak in with quality
> power points.
Oakton does have a real easy out of conference schedule. They get to play Woodson and West Springfield, I do not think they beat Madison though. Madison will finally get a win this year against Oakton calling it now. I say they win 4 games and miss the playoffs.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oakton beat those Bulldogs you were hyping in the
> Regional Final last year. Westfield always a
> bridesmaid never a bride. You can win all the
> regular season games you like but if you can't win
> the big one then people will hate.
>
> Oakton is not as good this season I agree. They
> will win games and they will make the playoffs.
> Look for them to right the ship this week at
> Madison. They will finish 6-4 5-5 which around
> here may be good enough to squeak in with quality
> power points.
Oakton does have a real easy out of conference schedule. They get to play Woodson and West Springfield, I do not think they beat Madison though. Madison will finally get a win this year against Oakton calling it now. I say they win 4 games and miss the playoffs.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
spartanjoke
()
Date: September 01, 2013 11:51AM
Hey- why are you saying West Springfield is an easy game? Don't you know the clowns over there have closed their practices to the public? As if anyone would watch them. Can't imagine what the only coach in the state of VA that Andy could find to take that job is going to come up with. Edison must be quaking in fear. Edison should beat them- which says all that needs to be said about WS athletic dept.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
steve k2
()
Date: September 01, 2013 11:56AM
Here is the spread for week 2.
Edison @ West Springfield (-7.0)
Falls Church (-1.5) @ Annandale
Hayfield @ South County (-6.5) *this is a really good game
Lake Braddock @ Stone Bridge (-3.0) *Game of the Week
Lee @ Chantilly (-21.0)
Madison @ Oakton (-6.0)
Marshall (-6.5) @ Wakefield
Mount Vernon @ Herndon (-17.0)
Stuart @ Jefferson (-20.0)
TC Williams @ Centreville (-28.0)
Woodson @ Robinson (-24.0)
Washington Lee (-7.0) @ McLean
West Potomac (-7.0) @ Fairfax
Westfield (-35.0) @ South Lakes
Yorktown (-24.0) @ Langley
Edison @ West Springfield (-7.0)
Falls Church (-1.5) @ Annandale
Hayfield @ South County (-6.5) *this is a really good game
Lake Braddock @ Stone Bridge (-3.0) *Game of the Week
Lee @ Chantilly (-21.0)
Madison @ Oakton (-6.0)
Marshall (-6.5) @ Wakefield
Mount Vernon @ Herndon (-17.0)
Stuart @ Jefferson (-20.0)
TC Williams @ Centreville (-28.0)
Woodson @ Robinson (-24.0)
Washington Lee (-7.0) @ McLean
West Potomac (-7.0) @ Fairfax
Westfield (-35.0) @ South Lakes
Yorktown (-24.0) @ Langley
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
West Lakes
()
Date: September 01, 2013 12:10PM
I wish I could make a legal wager on your games and their pointspreads.
Westfield beats South Lakes by 49 or more....
And I find it hard to beleive that a horrid Herndon team can be favored by 17 over any team, but they just might do it against woeful Mt. Vernon.
Over/under for Stone Bridge/Braddock is 72!
Westfield beats South Lakes by 49 or more....
And I find it hard to beleive that a horrid Herndon team can be favored by 17 over any team, but they just might do it against woeful Mt. Vernon.
Over/under for Stone Bridge/Braddock is 72!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Jimfeist
()
Date: September 01, 2013 01:05PM
The spread for Stone Bridge game is 3.5, not 3.
Get your fucking lines straight!
Get your fucking lines straight!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Football Fever
()
Date: September 01, 2013 01:27PM
Do you think Centreville is that strong to beat TC by that margin? If they do, I will believe they are the real deal
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
fan24052
()
Date: September 01, 2013 03:30PM
i think woodson will be held back by their offense.. their defense played lights out holding nick scott in check except for 2 big plays..i think they can pull big upsets vs braddock, TC, and soco
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 01, 2013 03:47PM
Football Fever Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you think Centreville is that strong to beat TC
> by that margin? If they do, I will believe they
> are the real deal
Spread does not have to be that much in order to make a statement. 17 is more realistic because TC is a very good team this year. Maybe good enough to give LB a bit of a run.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you think Centreville is that strong to beat TC
> by that margin? If they do, I will believe they
> are the real deal
Spread does not have to be that much in order to make a statement. 17 is more realistic because TC is a very good team this year. Maybe good enough to give LB a bit of a run.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
scores
()
Date: September 01, 2013 05:47PM
then this ranks the best of the patriot district:
1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders above the rest
2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson fan, but crushing oakton proves something
3- south county
4- west potomac
5- woodson-should be a year older, more experienced.
6- west springield-new staff brings new energy? a few more wins?
7- lee
8- annandale
what do you think?
1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders above the rest
2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson fan, but crushing oakton proves something
3- south county
4- west potomac
5- woodson-should be a year older, more experienced.
6- west springield-new staff brings new energy? a few more wins?
7- lee
8- annandale
what do you think?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Football Fever
()
Date: September 01, 2013 06:18PM
If Centreville handles TC Williams, Oakton will likely really be concerned when they play them
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Mactown
()
Date: September 01, 2013 06:44PM
Although they only won 4 games last year, I think Mclean is going to be a threat in the Liberty District this year. A lot of returning starters and this is their second year with the new "Worek" coaching staff. Matchups like Madison/Mclean and Fairfax/Mclean will be fun to watch
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Duane Epperson
()
Date: September 01, 2013 06:50PM
Mclean blows....
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Whatttt
()
Date: September 01, 2013 06:54PM
Wtf happened to my alma mater? I didn't play football at Robinson bc I like to do drugs instead but we ran shit back in 2002.
Guess Bendorf and the boys really were pumped full of roids and that's why we won state my senior year (2002). Looks like the squad has been shit since...
Any thoughts/rumors on Robinson steroids eArly 2000s?
Guess Bendorf and the boys really were pumped full of roids and that's why we won state my senior year (2002). Looks like the squad has been shit since...
Any thoughts/rumors on Robinson steroids eArly 2000s?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Love Robinison
()
Date: September 01, 2013 07:05PM
Here are winner for week 2.
Edison 20 @ West Springfield 21
Falls Church 6 @ Annandale 35
Hayfield 13 @ South County 36 ...this is a really big blow out
Lake Braddock 27 @ Stone Bridge 24 *Game of the Week
Lee 20 @ Chantilly 42
Madison 18 @ Oakton 28
Marshall 31 @ Wakefield 12
Mount Vernon 13 @ Herndon 17
Stuart 20 @ Jefferson 17
TC Williams 21 @ Centreville 35
Woodson 7 @ Robinson 28
Washington Lee 24 @ McLean 23
West Potomac 27 @ Fairfax 24
Westfield 42 @ South Lakes 0
Yorktown 28 @ Langley 30
Edison 20 @ West Springfield 21
Falls Church 6 @ Annandale 35
Hayfield 13 @ South County 36 ...this is a really big blow out
Lake Braddock 27 @ Stone Bridge 24 *Game of the Week
Lee 20 @ Chantilly 42
Madison 18 @ Oakton 28
Marshall 31 @ Wakefield 12
Mount Vernon 13 @ Herndon 17
Stuart 20 @ Jefferson 17
TC Williams 21 @ Centreville 35
Woodson 7 @ Robinson 28
Washington Lee 24 @ McLean 23
West Potomac 27 @ Fairfax 24
Westfield 42 @ South Lakes 0
Yorktown 28 @ Langley 30
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
NR Fanatic
()
Date: September 02, 2013 12:50AM
Love Robinison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here are winner for week 2.
>
> Edison 20 @ West Springfield 21
> Falls Church 6 @ Annandale 35
> Hayfield 13 @ South County 36 ...this is a really
> big blow out
> Lake Braddock 27 @ Stone Bridge 24 *Game of the
> Week
> Lee 20 @ Chantilly 42
> Madison 18 @ Oakton 28
> Marshall 31 @ Wakefield 12
> Mount Vernon 13 @ Herndon 17
> Stuart 20 @ Jefferson 17
> TC Williams 21 @ Centreville 35
> Woodson 7 @ Robinson 28
> Washington Lee 24 @ McLean 23
> West Potomac 27 @ Fairfax 24
> Westfield 42 @ South Lakes 0
> Yorktown 28 @ Langley 30
No way Langley beats Yorktown... I know nothing about TJ and Stuart but TJ did beat them 42-0 last year, that alone leads me to believe TJ is probably a little better.
How about Marshall vs. Wakefield? Battle of 0-10 teams from last year. One team is walking away very happy...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here are winner for week 2.
>
> Edison 20 @ West Springfield 21
> Falls Church 6 @ Annandale 35
> Hayfield 13 @ South County 36 ...this is a really
> big blow out
> Lake Braddock 27 @ Stone Bridge 24 *Game of the
> Week
> Lee 20 @ Chantilly 42
> Madison 18 @ Oakton 28
> Marshall 31 @ Wakefield 12
> Mount Vernon 13 @ Herndon 17
> Stuart 20 @ Jefferson 17
> TC Williams 21 @ Centreville 35
> Woodson 7 @ Robinson 28
> Washington Lee 24 @ McLean 23
> West Potomac 27 @ Fairfax 24
> Westfield 42 @ South Lakes 0
> Yorktown 28 @ Langley 30
No way Langley beats Yorktown... I know nothing about TJ and Stuart but TJ did beat them 42-0 last year, that alone leads me to believe TJ is probably a little better.
How about Marshall vs. Wakefield? Battle of 0-10 teams from last year. One team is walking away very happy...
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Boosters
()
Date: September 02, 2013 08:21AM
fan24052 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think woodson will be held back by their
> offense.. their defense played lights out holding
> nick scott in check except for 2 big plays..i
> think they can pull big upsets vs braddock, TC,
> and soco
Coach Bianchi get off the message board. This guy ??? What's wrong with these coaches .
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think woodson will be held back by their
> offense.. their defense played lights out holding
> nick scott in check except for 2 big plays..i
> think they can pull big upsets vs braddock, TC,
> and soco
Coach Bianchi get off the message board. This guy ??? What's wrong with these coaches .
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Buddy Garrity
()
Date: September 02, 2013 12:14PM
Coaches aren't on these sites, shame on you for slander.
None of these teams would come close up against the Dillon Panthers.
None of these teams would come close up against the Dillon Panthers.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Luke Skywalker
()
Date: September 02, 2013 09:22PM
The Rams of the 2000s were royal roid-ragers. Beating up opponents on the gridiron and terrorizing students all over the neighborhoods. They had an expense account at the local GNC and could purchase all the supplements they wanted. They can thank their lucky stars no one died or was killed by all the roiding. Bendorf and Meier, what say you?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
week 2
()
Date: September 04, 2013 09:27AM
Who is winning week 2?
>Edison @ West Springfield
> Falls Church @ Annandale
> Hayfield @ South County
> Lake Braddock @ Stone Bridge
> Lee @ Chantilly
> Madison @ Oakton
> Marshall @ Wakefield
> Mount Vernon @ Herndon
> Stuart @ Jefferson
> TC Williams @ Centreville
> Woodson @ Robinson
> Washington Lee @ McLean
> West Potomac @ Fairfax
> Westfield @ South Lakes
> Yorktown @ Langley
>Edison @ West Springfield
> Falls Church @ Annandale
> Hayfield @ South County
> Lake Braddock @ Stone Bridge
> Lee @ Chantilly
> Madison @ Oakton
> Marshall @ Wakefield
> Mount Vernon @ Herndon
> Stuart @ Jefferson
> TC Williams @ Centreville
> Woodson @ Robinson
> Washington Lee @ McLean
> West Potomac @ Fairfax
> Westfield @ South Lakes
> Yorktown @ Langley
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Johnny
()
Date: September 04, 2013 11:24AM
All of the home teams except Langley
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
really?
()
Date: September 04, 2013 01:08PM
Johnny Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All of the home teams except Langley
So you like South Lakes over Westfield?
-------------------------------------------------------
> All of the home teams except Langley
So you like South Lakes over Westfield?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
dorky
()
Date: September 04, 2013 01:38PM
No way that SL will beat Westfield, Annandale will not beat Falls Church, Mclean will not beat W&L, and West Springfield will not beat Edison.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
HS football is for LOSERS
()
Date: September 04, 2013 01:57PM
How does football get you a job? Oh, yeah, ask Jerry Sandusky or George Allen.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Johnny
()
Date: September 04, 2013 02:39PM
Obviously Westfield will win tho
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Football Fever
()
Date: September 04, 2013 02:50PM
I understand Madison lost a lot but I think Oakton lost more. Would not surprise me to see Oakton lose. The West Potomac Game will be interesting to see if they can bounce back from the Centreville beating.
The LB/SB game is the game to watch. I am going to try to pick it up on my PC via Game Day while attending another game Friday.
The LB/SB game is the game to watch. I am going to try to pick it up on my PC via Game Day while attending another game Friday.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
LancerLOL
()
Date: September 04, 2013 09:18PM
Lee isn't part of the Patriot District anymore but if I were I would rank them right above Annandale. Nothing Higher.
scores Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> then this ranks the best of the patriot district:
>
>
> 1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders above
> the rest
> 2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson fan,
> but crushing oakton proves something
> 3- south county
> 4- west potomac
> 5- woodson-should be a year older, more
> experienced.
> 6- west springield-new staff brings new energy? a
> few more wins?
> 7- lee
> 8- annandale
>
> what do you think?
scores Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> then this ranks the best of the patriot district:
>
>
> 1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders above
> the rest
> 2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson fan,
> but crushing oakton proves something
> 3- south county
> 4- west potomac
> 5- woodson-should be a year older, more
> experienced.
> 6- west springield-new staff brings new energy? a
> few more wins?
> 7- lee
> 8- annandale
>
> what do you think?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
LancerLOLfail
()
Date: September 04, 2013 09:20PM
that exactly what he said...
LancerLOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee isn't part of the Patriot District anymore but
> if I were I would rank them right above Annandale.
> Nothing Higher.
>
> scores Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > then this ranks the best of the patriot
> district:
> >
> >
> > 1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders
> above
> > the rest
> > 2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson
> fan,
> > but crushing oakton proves something
> > 3- south county
> > 4- west potomac
> > 5- woodson-should be a year older, more
> > experienced.
> > 6- west springield-new staff brings new energy?
> a
> > few more wins?
> > 7- lee
> > 8- annandale
> >
> > what do you think?
LancerLOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee isn't part of the Patriot District anymore but
> if I were I would rank them right above Annandale.
> Nothing Higher.
>
> scores Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > then this ranks the best of the patriot
> district:
> >
> >
> > 1- Lake Braddock-clearly head and shoulders
> above
> > the rest
> > 2- TC- havent seen them play as a wt woodson
> fan,
> > but crushing oakton proves something
> > 3- south county
> > 4- west potomac
> > 5- woodson-should be a year older, more
> > experienced.
> > 6- west springield-new staff brings new energy?
> a
> > few more wins?
> > 7- lee
> > 8- annandale
> >
> > what do you think?
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Raspy
()
Date: September 04, 2013 09:56PM
Langley's shot at beating Yorktown all hinge on whether they can stop MJ Stewart which they were unable to do last year when they actually had some talented players. But they lost pretty much all of them, especially on defense, so I doubt they have any chance whatsoever. I'm guessing it will be 35-7 Yorktown, and that's being generous. Maybe that meathead Howerton should focus on developing his crap skill players instead of his perennially fat, lethargic line that can only run block.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
It's not that hard!
()
Date: September 05, 2013 02:15PM
LancerLOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee isn't part of the Patriot District anymore but
> . . .
The new classification system did NOTHING to the districts - all districts in our area are UNCHANGED and Lee is still in the PATRIOT district. There are still all-district teams and district champs (based on district record alone in football). In all sports (I think) but football there are also conference champs. Football just uses power points to determine the 16 playoff teams.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee isn't part of the Patriot District anymore but
> . . .
The new classification system did NOTHING to the districts - all districts in our area are UNCHANGED and Lee is still in the PATRIOT district. There are still all-district teams and district champs (based on district record alone in football). In all sports (I think) but football there are also conference champs. Football just uses power points to determine the 16 playoff teams.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Ghost of Joe Paterno
()
Date: September 05, 2013 02:17PM
Hate to break it to you, but football is not part of the SOL, so when there are major budget revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of 2013" do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY back-to the point where it costs in excess of $250 to play.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Football Fever
()
Date: September 05, 2013 02:30PM
Can someone better explain the power points this year? For 6a, is a win vs another opponent worth 26 points and a loss, 15 points? Here is something from Virginiapreps and one 6A South team has 27 points. It seems 5A get 24points for a win against another 5A team and 26 points for a win against a 6A team.
http://virginiapreps.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=914&CID=1542534
http://virginiapreps.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=914&CID=1542534
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
What Does it cost
()
Date: September 05, 2013 03:11PM
The county (i.e. the taxpayer) only pays for the 3 travel busses, the Refs and the field maintenance/lights.
Everything else is paid for by fund raising/parents. In fact football doesn't even get their own gate, that is kept by the DSA for the overall sports program going mostly to the money losing sorts like girl's soccer, softball and field hockey.
Everything else is paid for by fund raising/parents. In fact football doesn't even get their own gate, that is kept by the DSA for the overall sports program going mostly to the money losing sorts like girl's soccer, softball and field hockey.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
any amount is too much
()
Date: September 05, 2013 03:46PM
The fact that it costs anything is the problem.
I think it is all a waste of money, and not really a school function-schools already have PE.
Sports cost more than all of the other activities put together. If you add marching band and cheerleading, it is way over the top.
If the parents want it, they can pay for ALL of it, and tack on 5-10% to the schools for administering the helicopter playground.
At least you admit some sports lose money-why do we even have them?
Strauss, Kaufax, McElveen, and Velkoff should be tossed out of office over this.
The County Board will have a riot on its hands if this kind of waste keeps up.
I think it is all a waste of money, and not really a school function-schools already have PE.
Sports cost more than all of the other activities put together. If you add marching band and cheerleading, it is way over the top.
If the parents want it, they can pay for ALL of it, and tack on 5-10% to the schools for administering the helicopter playground.
At least you admit some sports lose money-why do we even have them?
Strauss, Kaufax, McElveen, and Velkoff should be tossed out of office over this.
The County Board will have a riot on its hands if this kind of waste keeps up.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
RydellRoad
()
Date: September 05, 2013 04:46PM
any amount is too much Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fact that it costs anything is the problem.
>
> I think it is all a waste of money, and not really
> a school function-schools already have PE.
I meet very few people with your opinion (actually none that will speak it in public)... even among the libertarian and conservative circles.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The fact that it costs anything is the problem.
>
> I think it is all a waste of money, and not really
> a school function-schools already have PE.
I meet very few people with your opinion (actually none that will speak it in public)... even among the libertarian and conservative circles.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Happy to Speak My Mind
()
Date: September 05, 2013 06:23PM
Someone said:
"I would rather die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak"
That's my motto.
I think high school sports are a waste of time and money. If certain parents and others think this is so important, let them pay for it. I can just imagine the laughter if a parent approached the school and said their kid wanted to learn to read Sanskrit or play the harp. They'd be told to do it on their own.
But…football, marching band, cheerleading, that's somehow OK. I still wonder why these things are not in the SOL?
Even if a kid gets a sports scholarship, that's a kind of doom as well. Very few get pro contracts, and very few graduate. So now you have someone who is 22 years old, poor academic skills and no prospects. So much for the "look at all of the scholarships we'll get" argument.
Likewise, the arguments about school spirit, teamwork, lessons learned on the gridiron, those are all rubbish as well.
There's also a dark side involving bullying, rape, and all kinds of politics with parents, coaches, boosters and of course the school board.
People may say "well, football has always been here" and I would say "well, they used to think the earth was flat" and wait for a response.
"I would rather die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak"
That's my motto.
I think high school sports are a waste of time and money. If certain parents and others think this is so important, let them pay for it. I can just imagine the laughter if a parent approached the school and said their kid wanted to learn to read Sanskrit or play the harp. They'd be told to do it on their own.
But…football, marching band, cheerleading, that's somehow OK. I still wonder why these things are not in the SOL?
Even if a kid gets a sports scholarship, that's a kind of doom as well. Very few get pro contracts, and very few graduate. So now you have someone who is 22 years old, poor academic skills and no prospects. So much for the "look at all of the scholarships we'll get" argument.
Likewise, the arguments about school spirit, teamwork, lessons learned on the gridiron, those are all rubbish as well.
There's also a dark side involving bullying, rape, and all kinds of politics with parents, coaches, boosters and of course the school board.
People may say "well, football has always been here" and I would say "well, they used to think the earth was flat" and wait for a response.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Sad People
()
Date: September 05, 2013 06:47PM
It's truly sad when one or a few people have to take a discussion about something fun and exciting for others and decide to post things to try to bring everyone down to their low level life. It goes to show the type of people they are, rarely invited out and have a miserable life/job/family. I guess if they are miserable, everyone should be miserable. What's worse, is they think by whining and complaining on a forum like this will change things. If you have an opinion or don't like something, get off your ass and run for office, petition local people, do something but stop trying to suck the life out of other people's enjoyment.
Now lets talk some high school football. I am a big fan of gamedaymagazine.com (no affiliation) and they put out some nice analysis about the upcoming games.
Now lets talk some high school football. I am a big fan of gamedaymagazine.com (no affiliation) and they put out some nice analysis about the upcoming games.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 05, 2013 06:50PM
Football Fever Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can someone better explain the power points this
> year? For 6a, is a win vs another opponent worth
> 26 points and a loss, 15 points? Here is
> something from Virginiapreps and one 6A South team
> has 27 points. It seems 5A get 24points for a win
> against another 5A team and 26 points for a win
> against a 6A team.
> http://virginiapreps.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=9
> 14&CID=1542534
Here is a link to the rating system. In general, play the largest and best teams that you can and hope for wins.
http://www.vhsl.org/doc/upload/fb-2013-football-rating-scale.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can someone better explain the power points this
> year? For 6a, is a win vs another opponent worth
> 26 points and a loss, 15 points? Here is
> something from Virginiapreps and one 6A South team
> has 27 points. It seems 5A get 24points for a win
> against another 5A team and 26 points for a win
> against a 6A team.
> http://virginiapreps.rivals.com/content.asp?SID=9
> 14&CID=1542534
Here is a link to the rating system. In general, play the largest and best teams that you can and hope for wins.
http://www.vhsl.org/doc/upload/fb-2013-football-rating-scale.pdf
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Old School 77
()
Date: September 06, 2013 12:09AM
Ootball will always more important than anything you care about of Joe Paterno Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hate to break it to you, but football is not part
> of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of 2013"
> do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> back-to the point where it costs in excess of $250
> to play.
Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete, ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the way you used to!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hate to break it to you, but football is not part
> of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of 2013"
> do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> back-to the point where it costs in excess of $250
> to play.
Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete, ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the way you used to!!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
steve k2
()
Date: September 06, 2013 12:15AM
It is different then how it has been in the past. My understanding though...
If you win against a 6A school you get 26 points, a 5A school 24 points.
If you lose against a 6A school you get 14 points for just playing, and likewise a 5A school you get 12 points.
Now this is where you get rewarded for playing a good team, and why 6A schools have no problem playing Stone Bridge...
For teams you beat, you get 2 additional points per each win they have. Lets say a school has 5 wins against all 5-5 teams to keep it simple. That would be an additional 10 points for each win for a total of 50 points. If a 6A school like Braddock beats Stone Bridge and SB finishes 9-1, that would be an additional 18 points for Braddock on top of the 25* they got for the win.
For all the teams you lose to, you get a point for each win they have. If you lose to a 10-0 team that will be 10 additional points, if you lose to a 2-8 team that will be 2 points, another incentive to play tough competition.
*If you are a higher team playing down you automatically get 1 additional point, and if you are a higher team playing down in a district game you get 2 additional points. This is in place as 6A teams are mixed with 5A teams.
If you win against a 6A school you get 26 points, a 5A school 24 points.
If you lose against a 6A school you get 14 points for just playing, and likewise a 5A school you get 12 points.
Now this is where you get rewarded for playing a good team, and why 6A schools have no problem playing Stone Bridge...
For teams you beat, you get 2 additional points per each win they have. Lets say a school has 5 wins against all 5-5 teams to keep it simple. That would be an additional 10 points for each win for a total of 50 points. If a 6A school like Braddock beats Stone Bridge and SB finishes 9-1, that would be an additional 18 points for Braddock on top of the 25* they got for the win.
For all the teams you lose to, you get a point for each win they have. If you lose to a 10-0 team that will be 10 additional points, if you lose to a 2-8 team that will be 2 points, another incentive to play tough competition.
*If you are a higher team playing down you automatically get 1 additional point, and if you are a higher team playing down in a district game you get 2 additional points. This is in place as 6A teams are mixed with 5A teams.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Not a football loser
()
Date: September 06, 2013 10:15AM
Old School 77 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ootball will always more important than anything
> you care about of Joe Paterno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hate to break it to you, but football is not
> part
> > of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> > revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of
> 2013"
> > do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> > back-to the point where it costs in excess of
> $250
> > to play.
>
>
> Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu
> eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score
> hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete,
> ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than
> anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced
> pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the
> way you used to!!
1) Yes, I like soccer, but don't think we need to waste money on it in high school.
2) Sorry, don't eat tofu.
3) Sorry, not a band parent. Band goes with football, you know.
4) Sorry, I could care less about TJ.
5) Sorry, I don't "hover" over SOLs, I take steps to make sure my kids pass.
6) Never got my ass kicked by an athlete. Do you think athletes should be violent and predatory?
7) You think football is more important than family? If you do, I feel sorry for you.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ootball will always more important than anything
> you care about of Joe Paterno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hate to break it to you, but football is not
> part
> > of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> > revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of
> 2013"
> > do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> > back-to the point where it costs in excess of
> $250
> > to play.
>
>
> Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu
> eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score
> hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete,
> ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than
> anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced
> pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the
> way you used to!!
1) Yes, I like soccer, but don't think we need to waste money on it in high school.
2) Sorry, don't eat tofu.
3) Sorry, not a band parent. Band goes with football, you know.
4) Sorry, I could care less about TJ.
5) Sorry, I don't "hover" over SOLs, I take steps to make sure my kids pass.
6) Never got my ass kicked by an athlete. Do you think athletes should be violent and predatory?
7) You think football is more important than family? If you do, I feel sorry for you.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Just a loser you are
()
Date: September 06, 2013 10:38AM
7) Football, sports and clubs within high school are a family. These help teach kids social skills, leadership, respect, work ethic and camaraderie. Also how to deal with fear, multi-tasking and disappointment without resorting to guns, violence and faithless religion (whole different subject I know).
Read this:
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20021020&slug=mytake20
If you don’t here is an excerpt:
"Interscholastic programs enhance the overall educational experience and build well-rounded students and leaders. Need proof? A comprehensive, statewide study of high-school student-athletes in North Carolina over a three-year period found a significant difference in grade-point average, attendance rates, discipline referrals, dropout rates and graduation rates between students who participated in athletics or other activities and those who didn't.
In fact, student-athletes in the study had a 5 percent higher graduation rate, an 8 percent lower dropout rate, 10 percent fewer discipline referrals and missed six fewer days of school. Athletes' grade-point average was 2.86 vs. 1.96 for nonathletes."
Now Shut Up and stop trolling! Don't go away mad, just go away.
Can we get on to FOOTBALL!!!
Read this:
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20021020&slug=mytake20
If you don’t here is an excerpt:
"Interscholastic programs enhance the overall educational experience and build well-rounded students and leaders. Need proof? A comprehensive, statewide study of high-school student-athletes in North Carolina over a three-year period found a significant difference in grade-point average, attendance rates, discipline referrals, dropout rates and graduation rates between students who participated in athletics or other activities and those who didn't.
In fact, student-athletes in the study had a 5 percent higher graduation rate, an 8 percent lower dropout rate, 10 percent fewer discipline referrals and missed six fewer days of school. Athletes' grade-point average was 2.86 vs. 1.96 for nonathletes."
Now Shut Up and stop trolling! Don't go away mad, just go away.
Can we get on to FOOTBALL!!!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
RydellRoad
()
Date: September 06, 2013 12:13PM
I didn't want to get into the debate on this thread either but the more involved kids are in school activities (including sports) the more likely they are to graduate high school.
Goes for band as well:
http://www.nammfoundation.org/research/research-briefs-did-you-know
The jokes about football players working at McDonalds are pretty funny. My highly respected dentist is a former high school football player who suffered a career-ending knee injury his freshman year in college.
Goes for band as well:
http://www.nammfoundation.org/research/research-briefs-did-you-know
The jokes about football players working at McDonalds are pretty funny. My highly respected dentist is a former high school football player who suffered a career-ending knee injury his freshman year in college.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Explain This
()
Date: September 06, 2013 12:36PM
What with all of the football, athletic family, multitasking and discovery of antigravity and cold fusion going on in Fairfax, what is the explanation for this:
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/1298842.html
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/1298842.html
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
joining the chorus
()
Date: September 06, 2013 01:04PM
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-08-29/opinion/ct-perspec-0829-football-20120829_1_brain-trauma-high-school-football-brain-injury-research-institute
http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/cr-board-member-calls-for-banning-hs-football/article_4dbb7595-770a-589f-bf45-797606569742.html
http://schoolsofthought.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/02/school-board-member-wants-football-ban/
http://open.salon.com/blog/dgsmith/2009/06/02/time_to_eliminate_high_school_sports
all arguments to get rid of high school football!
http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/courier_times_news/cr-board-member-calls-for-banning-hs-football/article_4dbb7595-770a-589f-bf45-797606569742.html
http://schoolsofthought.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/02/school-board-member-wants-football-ban/
http://open.salon.com/blog/dgsmith/2009/06/02/time_to_eliminate_high_school_sports
all arguments to get rid of high school football!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Benjealous
()
Date: September 06, 2013 03:49PM
There aint no way they're going to charge money for these kids to play football. Unless its just the white kids who have to pay. Do you really think these niggers you see running around out there are paying any money? The niggers are already getting their breakfast, lunch, and everything else paid for. C'mon, man, wake up!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Benjealous
()
Date: September 06, 2013 03:49PM
There aint no way they're going to charge money for these kids to play football. Unless its just the white kids who have to pay. Do you really think these niggers you see running around out there are paying any money? The niggers are already getting their breakfast, lunch, and everything else paid for. C'mon, man, wake up!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Pay to Play
()
Date: September 06, 2013 03:57PM
Sorry I am tired of subsidizing band trips, football, turf, lacrosse, golf and cheerleading. I think it is all crap.
If the board of supervisors and school board don't wise up, they'll be voted out of office, plain and simple.
If they want to play, they can pay.
If the board of supervisors and school board don't wise up, they'll be voted out of office, plain and simple.
If they want to play, they can pay.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Dead!!
()
Date: September 06, 2013 04:01PM
This was a good football forum, thanks for killing it!!
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
RydellRoad
()
Date: September 06, 2013 04:08PM
Pay to Play Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry I am tired of subsidizing band trips,
> football, turf, lacrosse, golf and cheerleading. I
> think it is all crap.
Fortunately, most people are not basement dwelling hermits.
If you think the taxpayer is subsidizing these programs - try putting your kid through 4 years of any of the above and see how free it is. The booster organizations (read: private money) pay for a large percentage of the funds required. Why do you think they are always fundraising? (which also upsets people).
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry I am tired of subsidizing band trips,
> football, turf, lacrosse, golf and cheerleading. I
> think it is all crap.
Fortunately, most people are not basement dwelling hermits.
If you think the taxpayer is subsidizing these programs - try putting your kid through 4 years of any of the above and see how free it is. The booster organizations (read: private money) pay for a large percentage of the funds required. Why do you think they are always fundraising? (which also upsets people).
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Let the Boosters Pay It ALL
()
Date: September 06, 2013 04:30PM
Let the boosters pay for all of it. Crooked fundraising upsets me (as in where a fundraising company gets a cut greater than 10%). If there is fundraising money left to spare, channel some of it back to the schools.
I would not let my kids waste time with football, band, or cheerleading. They get private music and art lessons (which I pay for, no fundraising), ballet (which I pay for, no fundraising) and martial arts (which I pay for, no fundraising) as well as occasional private tutoring.
No this is not a wealthy family but we forego things like tv and Miley Cyrus in favor of proper educations. It is how my father raised me (a real gift, the value goes up every year) and it is part of my homage to him to pass it along.
I would not let my kids waste time with football, band, or cheerleading. They get private music and art lessons (which I pay for, no fundraising), ballet (which I pay for, no fundraising) and martial arts (which I pay for, no fundraising) as well as occasional private tutoring.
No this is not a wealthy family but we forego things like tv and Miley Cyrus in favor of proper educations. It is how my father raised me (a real gift, the value goes up every year) and it is part of my homage to him to pass it along.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 06, 2013 04:45PM
Got a bad feeling about CVille/TC game. I know that TC is not a pushover this year and the Cats are susceptible to not playing up to their potential. Hope that I'm wrong.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Ready for FB
()
Date: September 06, 2013 04:54PM
If we ignore these holier than thou individuals maybe they will go away
Inquisitive One - while you always have to worry about most teams, I saw a replay of the TC - Oakton game. TC scored on a number of big plays that I would be surprised if CVille would give. I did not see them drive down the field and score at all (although I might have missed one)
Oakton drove down the field a few times with limited offensive weapons but tc stopped them. CVille weapons are stronger
Still- always need to worry
Inquisitive One - while you always have to worry about most teams, I saw a replay of the TC - Oakton game. TC scored on a number of big plays that I would be surprised if CVille would give. I did not see them drive down the field and score at all (although I might have missed one)
Oakton drove down the field a few times with limited offensive weapons but tc stopped them. CVille weapons are stronger
Still- always need to worry
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 06, 2013 06:37PM
Anyone have any thought about the Stone Bridge/Lake Braddock game? I personally think that Stone Bridge will come after Henderson hard and force them to win the game on the ground. That is something that Lake Braddock cannot do is win the game with a ground game.
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 06, 2013 08:42PM
CVille/TC Williams update nearing end of second quarter from Jon Roetman, CVille 30 TC Williams 3:
Centreville's AJ Turner has 2 rushing TDs, a kickoff return TD and 2 INTs ... in the first half. Titans will see Turner in their sleep
Centreville's AJ Turner has 2 rushing TDs, a kickoff return TD and 2 INTs ... in the first half. Titans will see Turner in their sleep
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Inquisitive One
()
Date: September 06, 2013 08:42PM
CVille/TC Williams update nearing end of second quarter from Jon Roetman, CVille 30 TC Williams 3:
Centreville's AJ Turner has 2 rushing TDs, a kickoff return TD and 2 INTs ... in the first half. Titans will see Turner in their sleep
Centreville's AJ Turner has 2 rushing TDs, a kickoff return TD and 2 INTs ... in the first half. Titans will see Turner in their sleep
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Love this
()
Date: September 06, 2013 09:15PM
Old School 77 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ootball will always more important than anything
> you care about of Joe Paterno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hate to break it to you, but football is not
> part
> > of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> > revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of
> 2013"
> > do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> > back-to the point where it costs in excess of
> $250
> > to play.
>
>
> Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu
> eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score
> hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete,
> ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than
> anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced
> pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the
> way you used to!!
Lmao!!! Perfectly stated. When one is on their death bed one day I wonder if they say "hey can I take a look at my SOL score again". What the hell does being a genius do for you if you can't carry on a conversation and your a quitter when things get hard in life because your a pussy and you can't work with others cooperatively because you've always thought of yourself as too good to be part of a team
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ootball will always more important than anything
> you care about of Joe Paterno Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hate to break it to you, but football is not
> part
> > of the SOL, so when there are major budget
> > revisions thanks to the "Great Turf Fraud of
> 2013"
> > do not be surprised if football gets cut WAY
> > back-to the point where it costs in excess of
> $250
> > to play.
>
>
> Listen here, you fucking soccer lovin, tofu
> eating, band parent, TJ wannabe, SOL Test score
> hovering, got your ass kicked by an Athlete,
> ASSHOLE. Football will always more important than
> anything you care about! Tell your pizza faced
> pussy kid to suck it up and take his beating the
> way you used to!!
Lmao!!! Perfectly stated. When one is on their death bed one day I wonder if they say "hey can I take a look at my SOL score again". What the hell does being a genius do for you if you can't carry on a conversation and your a quitter when things get hard in life because your a pussy and you can't work with others cooperatively because you've always thought of yourself as too good to be part of a team
Re: Highschool Football 2013
Posted by:
Casper
()
Date: September 06, 2013 10:37PM
Oh boy, we got a major upset fellas. Langley beat Yorktown 35-28, on no fault of MJ Stewart though. He scored all 4 of Yorktowns TDs. The Saxons O line and running back absolutely man-handled Yorktown's D and the game was nowhere as close as the score indicates. Stone bridge is going to have their work cut out for them next week.