I wonder how many white people will fall victim to the "knockout game" while these games are occurring?

OneSBFan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Truthteller Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > OneSBFan Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The Truthteller Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > SECEAST Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Truthteller:
> > > > >
> > > > > You are SO wrong about which rules
> > determine
> > > > > player eligibility after a move or
> > transfer.
> > > > Read
> > > > > VHSL's handbook (link below). Its rules
> > > > determine
> > > > > whether a student who transfers or moves
> is
> > > > > eligible to play VHSL football. Each
> > district
> > > > > decides whether to allow the transfer,
> but
> > > not
> > > > > whether a player can play. Even VHSL's
> > waiver
> > > > > provisions now specifically restrict
> > > transfers
> > > > for
> > > > > sports. You also posted that Smith beats
> > all
> > > > the
> > > > > other beach schools soundly, but didn’t
> > > know
> > > > > that Ocean Lakes beat Smith in last
> > year’s
> > > > > playoffs. How could you not know that?
> > Seems
> > > > like
> > > > > your posts are stuck in the mid-1990s
> > before
> > > > the
> > > > > VHSL cleanups on transfers/recruiting in
> > 1998
> > > > and
> > > > > following. Read rules 28A-7-1 and
> > 28-7-1(1),
> > > > > making it perfectly clear that you are
> not
> > > > > eligible if you move or transfer unless
> > your
> > > > > parent or guardian has a corresponding
> > change
> > > > in
> > > > > physical address.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.vhsl.org/doc/upload/pub-handbook-2013-1
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > 42.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > PM 28A-7-1 (1) TRANSFER RULE/Move
> > Requirement
> > > > > (1-71)-A student who moves
> > > > > from one school to another with no move
> on
> > > the
> > > > > part of his parents is ineligible. This
> > > student
> > > > > can become eligible immediately when his
> > > > parents
> > > > > move to the zone served by the
> student’s
> > > new
> > > > > school."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I love the way you quote the rule, BUT not
> > the
> > > 3
> > > > pages of exceptions to the rule in the same
> > > book.
> > > > School Districts set the rules for
> transfers
> > > and
> > > > their eligibility, read the book again!
> > Where
> > > it
> > > > says Districts, that means School
> Districts,
> > > again
> > > > sounds like you are just ignorant of the
> > facts.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > You are also not very observant, I said
> > "other
> > > > Chesapeake schools" Ocean Lakes is from
> > > Virginia
> > > > Beach. Oscar Smith is from Chesapeake,
> again
> > > get
> > > > your facts straight before you challenge
> the
> > > > Truthteller. Bring that weak ass shit in
> here
> > > > again and I will slap it back in your face,
> > > AGAIN.
> > >
> > > ---------------------
> > > Truthteller: you are wrong again and must be
> > some
> > > kind of idiot. I read the entire rules he
> cited
> > > and his post is accurate about transfers. You
> > got
> > > caught with your weak and unsubstantiated BS.
> > You
> > > haven't cited any examples of illegal
> transfers
> > > anywhere just weak ass smack talk that is
> stuck
> > in
> > > the 1990s before the rule changes. My school
> > > played the ER teams most years and we did
> > ok--and
> > > you don't hear us crying like you are. Man
> up,
> > let
> > > people play FB and shut up unless you can
> cite
> > ONE
> > > example. That's how all this started--your BS
> > that
> > > you can't back up about people cheating.
> >
> >
> >
> > You know I was going to give you guys the
> benefit
> > of doubt that you were just ignorant of the
> facts,
> > BUT you keep coming back with your weak ass
> shit,
> > trying to call out the Truthteller! You are
> > obviously just liars! who are now trying to
> bring
> > pity into play with some Bullshit about kids of
> > military playing for Smith. Nigga Please!
> >
> > See the below quoted directly from the VHSL
> > handbook. These are just a few of the
> exceptions
> > to the Transfer rule! There are pages and
> pages
> > of exceptions where someone can work to exempt
> the
> > limp dick VHSL on enforcement of their rule.
> You
> > continue to get abused with your own rulebook,
> I
> > feel like the older brother holding your hand
> and
> > hitting you in the face, while ridiculing you
> with
> > "STOP HITTING YOURSELF!" STOP HITTING YOURSELF!"
>
> >
> >
> > LOL!! PATHETIC
> >
> >
> >
> > (7) A school board or division superintendent
> may
> > transfer a student, by name,
> > within the school division without affecting
> that
> > student’s eligibility by specifically granting
> a
> > waiver of the Transfer Rule (28A-7-1). Such
> > waivers should be considered for the welfare of
> > the student and/or school system and not for
> > athletic and/or activity purposes. The Master
> > Eligibility List of all teams which have
> students
> > who have been so waived shall reference the
> > specific school board minutes or written
> > documentation granting the waiver
> >
> > (5) A student entering the eighth grade for the
> > first time becomes immediately eligible in the
> > high school in which he/she enrolls regardless
> of
> > his or her residence status. A student entering
> > the ninth grade for the first time becomes
> > immediately eligible in the high school in
> which
> > he/she enrolls regardless of his or her
> residence
> > status.
> >
> >
> > (1) A student shall become eligible for
> > interscholastic competition after he/she has
> been
> > enrolled in the school for 365 consecutive
> > calendar days. Exception: If a student
> transfers
> > during the summer and remains ineligible for
> the
> > entire subsequent school year, he/she would
> become
> > eligible beginning with the fall season of the
> > following academic year.
>
> --------------------
>
> Like you posted, subsection 7 states that the
> waivers can't for "athletic and/or activity"
> purposes. Your anecdotal info is old and dates
> back to the 1990s before the cleanups. You're
> already making excuses for why you don't think
> whatever team is yours might lose. Every team that
> has made it this far can play.


CMON MAN! Do you read before you post? I told you I do not give a shit who wins (re read my original post), I am just here to tell the truth about these "transfers". I quoted directly from the VHSL rule book that you referenced. If you have a problem with the references refresh your handbook.

Are you serious about referring back to the "athletic and/or activity" as a deterrent to having a transfer! OH YEA! my son wants to come to Smith because he really wants to attend this better school and OH by the way, he is a pretty good football player. Get serious!

The Truthteller Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OneSBFan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Truthteller Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > OneSBFan Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > The Truthteller Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > SECEAST Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Truthteller:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are SO wrong about which rules
> > > determine
> > > > > > player eligibility after a move or
> > > transfer.
> > > > > Read
> > > > > > VHSL's handbook (link below). Its rules
> > > > > determine
> > > > > > whether a student who transfers or
> moves
> > is
> > > > > > eligible to play VHSL football. Each
> > > district
> > > > > > decides whether to allow the transfer,
> > but
> > > > not
> > > > > > whether a player can play. Even VHSL's
> > > waiver
> > > > > > provisions now specifically restrict
> > > > transfers
> > > > > for
> > > > > > sports. You also posted that Smith
> beats
> > > all
> > > > > the
> > > > > > other beach schools soundly, but
> didn’t
> > > > know
> > > > > > that Ocean Lakes beat Smith in last
> > > year’s
> > > > > > playoffs. How could you not know that?
> > > Seems
> > > > > like
> > > > > > your posts are stuck in the mid-1990s
> > > before
> > > > > the
> > > > > > VHSL cleanups on transfers/recruiting
> in
> > > 1998
> > > > > and
> > > > > > following. Read rules 28A-7-1 and
> > > 28-7-1(1),
> > > > > > making it perfectly clear that you are
> > not
> > > > > > eligible if you move or transfer unless
> > > your
> > > > > > parent or guardian has a corresponding
> > > change
> > > > > in
> > > > > > physical address.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.vhsl.org/doc/upload/pub-handbook-2013-1
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > 42.pdf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PM 28A-7-1 (1) TRANSFER RULE/Move
> > > Requirement
> > > > > > (1-71)-A student who moves
> > > > > > from one school to another with no move
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > part of his parents is ineligible. This
> > > > student
> > > > > > can become eligible immediately when
> his
> > > > > parents
> > > > > > move to the zone served by the
> > student’s
> > > > new
> > > > > > school."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I love the way you quote the rule, BUT
> not
> > > the
> > > > 3
> > > > > pages of exceptions to the rule in the
> same
> > > > book.
> > > > > School Districts set the rules for
> > transfers
> > > > and
> > > > > their eligibility, read the book again!
> > > Where
> > > > it
> > > > > says Districts, that means School
> > Districts,
> > > > again
> > > > > sounds like you are just ignorant of the
> > > facts.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You are also not very observant, I said
> > > "other
> > > > > Chesapeake schools" Ocean Lakes is from
> > > > Virginia
> > > > > Beach. Oscar Smith is from Chesapeake,
> > again
> > > > get
> > > > > your facts straight before you challenge
> > the
> > > > > Truthteller. Bring that weak ass shit in
> > here
> > > > > again and I will slap it back in your
> face,
> > > > AGAIN.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------
> > > > Truthteller: you are wrong again and must
> be
> > > some
> > > > kind of idiot. I read the entire rules he
> > cited
> > > > and his post is accurate about transfers.
> You
> > > got
> > > > caught with your weak and unsubstantiated
> BS.
> > > You
> > > > haven't cited any examples of illegal
> > transfers
> > > > anywhere just weak ass smack talk that is
> > stuck
> > > in
> > > > the 1990s before the rule changes. My
> school
> > > > played the ER teams most years and we did
> > > ok--and
> > > > you don't hear us crying like you are. Man
> > up,
> > > let
> > > > people play FB and shut up unless you can
> > cite
> > > ONE
> > > > example. That's how all this started--your
> BS
> > > that
> > > > you can't back up about people cheating.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You know I was going to give you guys the
> > benefit
> > > of doubt that you were just ignorant of the
> > facts,
> > > BUT you keep coming back with your weak ass
> > shit,
> > > trying to call out the Truthteller! You are
> > > obviously just liars! who are now trying to
> > bring
> > > pity into play with some Bullshit about kids
> of
> > > military playing for Smith. Nigga Please!
> > >
> > > See the below quoted directly from the VHSL
> > > handbook. These are just a few of the
> > exceptions
> > > to the Transfer rule! There are pages and
> > pages
> > > of exceptions where someone can work to
> exempt
> > the
> > > limp dick VHSL on enforcement of their rule.
> > You
> > > continue to get abused with your own
> rulebook,
> > I
> > > feel like the older brother holding your hand
> > and
> > > hitting you in the face, while ridiculing you
> > with
> > > "STOP HITTING YOURSELF!" STOP HITTING
> YOURSELF!"
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > LOL!! PATHETIC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (7) A school board or division superintendent
> > may
> > > transfer a student, by name,
> > > within the school division without affecting
> > that
> > > student’s eligibility by specifically
> granting
> > a
> > > waiver of the Transfer Rule (28A-7-1). Such
> > > waivers should be considered for the welfare
> of
> > > the student and/or school system and not for
> > > athletic and/or activity purposes. The Master
> > > Eligibility List of all teams which have
> > students
> > > who have been so waived shall reference the
> > > specific school board minutes or written
> > > documentation granting the waiver
> > >
> > > (5) A student entering the eighth grade for
> the
> > > first time becomes immediately eligible in
> the
> > > high school in which he/she enrolls
> regardless
> > of
> > > his or her residence status. A student
> entering
> > > the ninth grade for the first time becomes
> > > immediately eligible in the high school in
> > which
> > > he/she enrolls regardless of his or her
> > residence
> > > status.
> > >
> > >
> > > (1) A student shall become eligible for
> > > interscholastic competition after he/she has
> > been
> > > enrolled in the school for 365 consecutive
> > > calendar days. Exception: If a student
> > transfers
> > > during the summer and remains ineligible for
> > the
> > > entire subsequent school year, he/she would
> > become
> > > eligible beginning with the fall season of
> the
> > > following academic year.
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> > Like you posted, subsection 7 states that the
> > waivers can't for "athletic and/or activity"
> > purposes. Your anecdotal info is old and dates
> > back to the 1990s before the cleanups. You're
> > already making excuses for why you don't think
> > whatever team is yours might lose. Every team
> that
> > has made it this far can play.
>
>
> CMON MAN! Do you read before you post? I told you
> I do not give a shit who wins (re read my original
> post), I am just here to tell the truth about
> these "transfers". I quoted directly from the
> VHSL rule book that you referenced. If you have a
> problem with the references refresh your handbook.
>
>
> Are you serious about referring back to the
> "athletic and/or activity" as a deterrent to
> having a transfer! OH YEA! my son wants to come
> to Smith because he really wants to attend this
> better school and OH by the way, he is a pretty
> good football player. Get serious!
---------
Sure, I can think of 2 schools in the ex-ER whose football programs benefitted from the old days of liberal transfers. Those days ended right around when Landstown titled with Percy Harvin. Your first post stated that Chesapeake kids could still go to "any school" they want as long as they had transportation. Maybe so in the past but the district's current handbook requires in-zone attendance with the same exceptions we have here. Then we linked you to Chesapeake's sports rule book stating that VHSL rules, not the district, decides who can play. Even you cited the rule that playing sports can't be a factor. No player is going to transfer and risk having to sit out the 365 days. Others don't transfer because of the same reasons kids around here don't move and transfer into better programs. Some might still game the system -- but mobility is restricted vs. the way it used to be. Maybe at least we can agree on that unless we find out that some of the current players are illegals. I know Andrew Brown isn't.

Would rather engage you on this weekend's games--can SJ and Westfield pull upsets and will BW end up winning D5 North. What do you think?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/29/2013 04:12PM by SECEAST.

WestfieldDad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> O Smith had the speed advantage over Westfield in
> 2007 - 3 D1 senior recruit receivers and the
> junior was the fastest kid on the field, but
> Westfield won anyway.
>
> Reasons...
>
> Westfield had a great punting/kicking game, O
> Smith's was dreadful. 25 yards a punt difference,
> field goals from the 30+ and kickoffs into the
> endzone.
>
> Glennon - Glennon a senior - threw darts, had a
> senior's gamesmanship, and had the confidence of
> everyone on the team - they "knew" he'd get it
> done and he did, too.
>
> And, as Berdhius said, luck.

Holy siht, I don't remember mentioning luck. Discipline, my friends, and technique will win the day. Centreville had it, with superior tackling, in the 2011 NR finals over Westfield.

And another observation about that 2011 Centreville team - how the the Coach conducted himself and led the team immediately after their OT regular season loss to WF. He gathered that team in a circle in the middle of the field, taking a knee, and commended his players for a well fought game. Such respect for his players, and in return from his players. Did not see a single hung head in that group. That impressed me the most about that team.

Broad Run and Briar Woods tied at 31 in overtime! This is a great game!

Briar Woods knocks off Broad Run 37 to 34!

Great high school football game today at Briar Woods. Amazing effort by Broad Run team that lost by 35 to Briar a few weeks ago.

Gutsy effort by Vandy recruit McSorley, who was banged up and not 100%.

Should be great game next week for Region 5 championship vs North Staffoed - Massaponex winner.

Great job, Coach Griffis and your Spartans.

Yes, sounds like Broad Run really found something that worked the last couple weeks. To beat Stone Bridge who they got crushed by, then to almost take down Briar Woods who they did get crushed by, kudos to them for making me look like an idiot with my 3 touchdown spread.

Broad Run really played their hearts out this afternoon and the last few weeks. I walk away frozen but quite impressed in both teams.

Anyone know the score of the South 6A region game today?

Ocean Lakes lost

Ouch! Just confirmed fdjk

23-20 - must have been good!

I was thinking that OL and OS would be the South Region Finals.

Guess anything can happen! Hope C'ville and LB remember that!

The first "college program" got beat down south tonight - Ocean Lakes. Will Oscar Smith be next? The karma of their recruiting methods are coming back to haunt them....

who are these teams?

Well, if you are claiming that Ocean Lakes is cheating on such a rampant scale, how could they have possibly lost today's game? Hasn't God or Providence or whatever already decided to give them the championship trophy for the next five years anyway?

Did the C-Ville game happen? Score? Nothing posted here or on Max Preps. We are out of town, so don't know of any cancellations. What happened?

C-Ville score? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Did the C-Ville game happen? Score? Nothing
> posted here or on Max Preps. We are out of town,
> so don't know of any cancellations. What happened?

6A North games are Saturday afternoon.

What time are they? Can't find a schedule for 6A North games. Thanks.

Stonewall Jackson thinks they can pull off the upset for the third straight time. They will have to play a near flawless game to do so. Rots o ruck.

nat4lee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Class 6A Playoffs -- Region Semifinals (State
> Quarterfinals)
> Friday and Saturday, November 29 and 30, 2013
>
> North
>
> #13 Stonewall Jackson (8-4) at #1 Centreville
> (12-0) in Clifton on Saturday at 1:30 p.m.
> #3 Westfield (10-2) at #2 Lake Braddock (12-0) in
> Burke on Saturday at 1:30 p.m.
>
> South
>
> #5 Forest Park (9-3) at #1 Oscar Smith (12-0) in
> Chesapeake on Saturday at 2:00 p.m.
> #3 Colonial Forge (9-3) at #2 Ocean Lakes (12-0)
> in Virginia Beach on Friday at 7:00 p.m.

nat4lee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Class 5A Playoffs -- Region Semifinals (State
> Quarterfinals)
> Friday and Saturday, November 29 and 30, 2013
>
> North
>
> #5 North Stafford (10-2) at #1 Massaponax (12-0)
> in Fredericksburg on Saturday at 2:00 p.m.
> #7 Broad Run (9-3) at #3 Briar Woods (11-1) in
> Ashburn on Friday at 1:30 p.m.
>
> South
>
> #2 Atlee (11-1) at #1 L.C. Bird (12-0) in
> Chesterfield on Friday at 7:00 p.m.
> #2 Green Run (9-3) at #1 Salem (10-2) in Virginia
> Beach on Friday at 7:00 p.m.

Thank you, Nat4lee!

nat4lee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, if you are claiming that Ocean Lakes is
> cheating on such a rampant scale, how could they
> have possibly lost today's game? Hasn't God or
> Providence or whatever already decided to give
> them the championship trophy for the next five
> years anyway?


---------
SO glad you answered these posters' claims. If a beach team wins, it is "cheating." If it loses "it is karma" because of cheating. When SB won 7 of 10 NR-D5 titles, people said we cheated, too. People also wrongfully accused LB with Henderson, etc. These crybabies have "credible sources" yet they can't cite one single example. Should be easy to do if it's so "rampant." We see beach teams every year and over time they are no better than teams from here. Maybe they put more players in D1 but their teams have not dominated ANY state class lately except for Phoebus in D5 and that run is over!!!!

Oh boy Ocean Lakes down, paving the way for the Tigers!! Coach M is going to have these boys ready. Come on C'Ville you ass whoopin will be waiting!! To slow and predictable to play with the teams down here. Like I said before, catch us if you can!! Do I need the YouTube highlights again haha??!!

Go Tigers!!

Better be careful what you wish for asswipe.

Does anybody know if the games or on TV? Thank You

are**

Stonewall 14 cville 14 lake b 7 westfiweld 0 2nd qtr on both

Centreville 21 - 14 3rd quarter

Westfield is about to beat Lake Braddock.. looks like Cville/Westfield Region final all over again!

Concorde Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Westfield is about to beat Lake Braddock.. looks
> like Cville/Westfield Region final all over again!


Score, please?

Westfield Over Braddock for all you LB cocksuckers.

westfield beat lb 19 to 16

Centreville 52 SJ 21

WOOF!

Gotta love this... it's why we actually go and play the games! Should be interesting next week with Westfield at Centreville to decide the North champion, and Colonial Forge at Oscar Smith to decide the South champion.

Can't wait!

Smith Over Centreville in the State Championship 41-21.....What do you guys think??

predictions Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Smith Over Centreville in the State Championship
> 41-21.....What do you guys think??


My first impressions say the score should be closer, within 10 points, and Centreville MIGHT have the slight edge in that game... but again, anything could happen before we get to UVA in two weeks! Westfield looks good, hmm?

steve k2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Division 5
>
> North Stafford (-6.0) @ Massaponax
> *North Stafford avenges their loss and hands
> Massaponax their first. Honestly I still haven't
> seen Massaponax and they may be the real deal, but
> I did see North Stafford and that team was loaded.
> I find it hard to believe a team beats them twice
> in one season.
>
> Broad Run @ Briar Woods (-21.0)
> *Still shocked Broad Run took down Stone Bridge,
> and actually quite disappointed. Stone Bridge was
> the better team and dominated Broad Run earlier in
> the season. A lot of people wanted to see the
> perenial state powers Stone Bridge and Briar Woods
> square off for the first time in the playoffs and
> going into the season I thought it would be a
> given. Not a huge Loudoun follower but I don't
> think Broad Run will play them close.
>
>
> Division 6
>
> Westfield @ Lake Braddock (-14.0)
> *Again at this point in the season, all these
> teams are good, but just going off what I saw, I
> like Lake Braddock winning fairly comfortably this
> go around.
>
> Stonewall Jackson @ Centreville (-20.0)
> *Still haven't seen SJHS, but I'm guessing SJHS
> has not seen a team like Centreville this year.
> This may be a good one, but I am picking
> Centreville to cruise.

Westfield beats Lake Henderson today 17-16. Yeah, Lake Henderson got "comfortably" beat today by a team that did not give up, even though everyone thinks it's all about Caleb Henderson. I wonder if he's doing his Cam Newton "Superman" move now? Him and Lake Braddock losing makes my day for a number of reasons! Hahahahahahahahaha! Go Bulldogs!

Jim Greek Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder how many white people will fall victim to
> the "knockout game" while these games are
> occurring?

Come play knockout with me you fucking punk.

Choke Braddock....once again....how do you lose when you're up 16-3 in the red zone with 5 minutes left in the game????!!!!

Hey Rootboy,
nice name, fits you well, you white faggot..........you need some nigger to knock your sissy ass out.

Hey Lake Braddock, hey Caleb Henderson - you are who we thought you were....

I was at the game, they missed their go ahead extra point but the refs through a bullshit flag for roughing the kicker which gave them another shot, which they made. We completely deserved that loss though for not being able to close them out

Also Caleb lost his helmet on a play so had to sit out on a crucial 3rd and 8 on our last meaningful possession

that is called bad karma

hioh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Rootboy,
> nice name, fits you well, you white
> faggot..........you need some nigger to knock your
> sissy ass out.

Come to me punk, we'll figure it out.

CVille ready to lay it on Westfield again baby!!

for all of those who said LB was better than Cville sorry, you wont be able to see that game happen.

lbstudent Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Also Caleb lost his helmet on a play so had to sit
> out on a crucial 3rd and 8 on our last meaningful
> possession

Even better, punk ass crybaby #9 on Lake Henderson gets a personal foul for starting a fight at the end of the game because he's so upset! Way to keep your head and lose with a little class you little bitch. I am so glad Lake Henderson lost. Total lack of class by that whole team. Bunch of cocky assholes got what they had coming. Although it might have been fun to watch Centreville stomp Lake Henderson in the final, but Lake Henderson proved they were mostly hype this season.

Better yet Henderson and daddy move to North Carolina now....that is all you ever cared about not Virginia high school football.

I can tell you all the Concorde coaches are congratulating Coach Simmons and his staff. No love lost between tham and the Polythress regime at LB. Karma is a bitch.

The Concorde once again establishes itself as the strongest conference in the region.

Agree with your post with one quibble = Concorde ALWAYS has been best district in the area

Lake Braddock, what a bunch of poseurs. That is how it goes when you transfer your selfish QB in, play a pussy schedule in the Patriot and assume you are going to cake walk through the playoffs. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA....

Why so much hateration. LB played the game, fought hard and lost. Henderson played hard and lost. Enough already. All the hateration smacks of simple and shallow jealousy. Good luck to Westfield and C'ville, repping the North. Good luck to the Henderson kid and all other LB seniors who move forward to the next level.

Don't understand the hate for LB. LB was a great team this year - how can you discount a 12-1 season? Reminds me of the haters that came out after the last two 12-1 Westfield seasons. Acting like it was a bad year. 12-1 is a GREAT season and LB should be proud of their accomplishments this year.

Stop The Haters Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why so much hateration. LB played the game,
> fought hard and lost. Henderson played hard and
> lost. Enough already. All the hateration smacks
> of simple and shallow jealousy. Good luck to
> Westfield and C'ville, repping the North. Good
> luck to the Henderson kid and all other LB seniors
> who move forward to the next level.

Agree, poster. LB lost and Westfield won. The refs let the two teams play and the better team today came out on top. I would have loved to see a centerville / lake Braddock game.
The game today was hard fought and well played by both teams. Congrats to the bulldogs, good luck next week.

Ok thanks mommy and daddy. Braddock sucks and the karma came back to bite them in the ass.

I agree Braddock had this shit coming to them. Be gone Henderson, bye bye.

28-0
28-0
28-0
28-0
28-0

yeah baby 28-0 ha ha

BRAD DOCK SUX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok thanks mommy and daddy. Braddock sucks and the
> karma came back to bite them in the ass.

Hahaha. Just like to see what goes around come around for some big time assholes. Karmic justice. Lake Henderson was so goddamn arrogant and without class this season, especially their QB. Saw him taunt and gloat many times this fall after beating up on weak teams, like he is some kind of NFL superstar, which is just what his father was trying to spin and hype on VA Preps, Gameday, etc. It's easy to pad your stats against weak teams. And it's easy to pretend you're some kind of legit option QB who can actually run. What a joke. He'll find out it's a different story at UNC, if he ever even sees the field.

I agree screw braddock and the Hendersons....got what they deserved

Was at the game and even though Westfield hung in and took the game not sure they have nearly what it takes to beat Centreville next week. Remember they were losing 16-3 until nearly the end, not exactly an offensive explosion. Might not get shellacked like they did the first time against the Wildcats but not sensing they can beat CVille and go south to Charlottesville.

You got that right Northern Region Guy

Ok Rootboy, I'm no fan of LB but I think you can stop using your less-than-witty "Lake Henderson" reference. You probably have some other axe to grind, so move on.

northern region guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Was at the game and even though Westfield hung in
> and took the game not sure they have nearly what
> it takes to beat Centreville next week. Remember
> they were losing 16-3 until nearly the end, not
> exactly an offensive explosion. Might not get
> shellacked like they did the first time against
> the Wildcats but not sensing they can beat CVille
> and go south to Charlottesville.

Agreed. Westfield hung on today and beat a very hyped up team which was really not as good as some people were saying. Centreville will be a big challenge. Not impossible to beat, but Westfield will have to do everything right and have a little luck (and luck is where preparation meets opportunity). Unlike today against Lake Henderson, Westfield will need to convert their 3rd and 4th downs, finish drives and not leave points on the field. Also will need to take care of the ball and don't make it easy for Centreville, which has an explosive offense. Should be a good game. I am happy to see these two teams in there.

I heard Thrasher Walker went out in first half and came back on crutches in the second half. Anyone know the extent of his injury?

That makes the WF win even that much more impressive.

Hey Root Boy ok and I do not have a dog in the fight but I see Centreville winning 41-20 over Westfield. Do not think it is going to be particularly close.

Haaaaaa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok Rootboy, I'm no fan of LB but I think you can
> stop using your less-than-witty "Lake Henderson"
> reference. You probably have some other axe to
> grind, so move on.

Awww, does that annoy you? Sorry! I think I'll be using "Lake Henderson" for the foreseeable future, because I kind of like the ring of it, and also because it seems to piss you off, ese.

If Thrasher Walker does not play could even be something like 41-10. Do not see where Westfield will get consistent offense as they surely did not today.

Here are your state semifinal (region final) matchups, with the dates and times to be announced Monday morning by the VHSL:

6A
Westfield @ Centreville
Colonial Forge @ Oscar Smith

5A
North Stafford @ Briar Woods
Salem (VB) @ L.C. Bird

northern region guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Root Boy ok and I do not have a dog in the
> fight but I see Centreville winning 41-20 over
> Westfield. Do not think it is going to be
> particularly close.

You are probably not too far off. Everything will have to go right for Westfield, and Centreville will have to make some mistakes, to make it a close game and actually pull out the win. But as we have seen, Centreville can go down 21-0 and still come roaring back. Westfield's defense is better than South County's, but Centreville has so many weapons.

Who is this rootboy punk? He sure runs his mouth on here. Probabbly never even played a down in his life.

Cockiest school in Nova u wonder why everyone hates them and is piling on leading 16 to 3 with over5 min to go and henderson throws a pass around westfield 25 pick 6 and the come back is on. Just run out the clock on the ground and u win but nooo! Greedy and cocky and now I know it tastes bad Braddock. Even all the other patriot conf opponents wanted braddock to lose even though concorde will continue to have bragging rights. Several patriot conf folks were saying anyone other than braddock and we would pull for patriot

homosexual rootboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who is this rootboy punk? He sure runs his mouth
> on here. Probabbly never even played a down in his
> life.

Oh, did you call me a homo? Guess you told me good, huh Caleb? Fuck you, you ugly loser.

They will call this one "Mistake by the Lake" in Lake Braddock football history books.

Why do y'all hate us so much?

mistake by the lake Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They will call this one "Mistake by the Lake" in
> Lake Braddock football history books.

Hahahahahahaha!!! I LIKE that! Better than Lake Henderson. Mistake is right. Probably should have stayed at West Po, instead of trying to stack the deck.

Serious ? Lake B has a stud athlete 6 3 210 fast big wideout A J with 1 touch 5 yards. HENDO C'mon Man!

braddock karma Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> leading 16 to 3 with over5 min to go and henderson throws a pass around
> westfield 25 pick 6 and the come back is on.

that is not what happened

Does anyone who was actually at the Westfield/Lake Braddock game today have a DETAILED analysis of what actually occurred during the game, and why Westfield came out the victor?

I didnt see the WF/LB game but I understand Tyler-Thrasher Walker had a hurt knee early.
Anyone have the scoop on how serious it was?
And anyone have a sense about the upcoming Oscar Smith Colonial Gorge game?

Braddock was up 16-3, and going for a 30 yard field goal with 5 minutes to go....ball was blocked and Westfield ran it all the way back...........then they got it back and drove down for the winning score.
Westfield ran the ball really well, but Braddock kind of gave the game away in the end.
That's the way it goes sometimes.

Rootboy needs his faggot ass whipped.....this nigger here is just the person to do it..........c'mon whiteboy

Nat,

I was at the entire game. LB totally gave the game away. Midway through the 4th quarter it didn't even feel like the two teams should have been on the same field it seemed so clearly in hand.

As was said, with about five minutes left, LB was driving into Westfield territory. In my opinion, the coaches messed up big time in that they were pretty conservative most of the game and most plays were the run option with very little passing. If LB had stuck to the ground game and used clock, it would have been game over. Instead, LB had an incomplete pass on 1st down and another on 3rd down, saving around two minutes.

Westfield has no passing game whatsoever, and usually takes around 4-5 minutes to ground and pound down the field, so even if LB had "gone for it" on 4th down, Westfield would have needed what was left just to get one score, nevermind two scores.

Instead, the FG try line drived right to a kid in the secondary who sprinted downfield. One of the issues was he was almost tackled at the LB 20 yard line, right in front of where I was, and a number of us believed the runner actually stepped out of bounds, but it wasn't called.

When LB got ball back still up 6 points, they got one first down, but then Henderson's helmet came off during the 2nd down play, so Edwards came in and almost got a first down. I would have liked to have seen LB "Bill Belichek" it at that point and get the first down on 4th and 1, but it would have been a risky call on the LB 30. They did punt and got it to Westfield 20, but LB allowed Westfield to break a couple of long runs, and they scored with 15 seconds left.

This is when the greatest extra point refereeing cluster f*** you have ever seen occurred. Westfield missed the attempt keeping the score at 16, but refs called roughing the kicker, even though it was tipped by an LB player. (Just to confirm, I talked to a kid just now at a friend's house who confirmed the ball was tipped), but the refs ignored that and called the penalty. After 2 LB offsides and 1 Westfield illegal motion, and a couple more kicks, the point after was good. That was ball game.

Bottom line in my opinion--LB played conservative at times when "airing it out" made sense, but with game in hand and clock and field their friends, they didn't manage the game well and just like Alabama, a fluke play allowed the game to get away from them.

Thank you for calm rational people on this board. Great points that I think deserve to be debated in the Burke community for some time to come.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/30/2013 09:56PM by nat4lee.

roundtree Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rootboy needs his faggot ass whipped.....this
> nigger here is just the person to do
> it..........c'mon whiteboy

Poor thing. Are you one of the blobs who stands on the sideline in your Lake Henderson purple people eater uniform and never gets to get on the field? Or are you one of the cowards who talks about it, but really doesn't even have the balls to take the risk of sucker punching some woman walking along and then running away? Probably both.

Nat,

I haven't seen Centerville play this year, but given what I've seen in the papers, I will be stunned if Westfield gets within 2 TD's in the final score, especially if their stud running back is hurt. I was not real impressed overall with Westfield--play hard and steady, but talent wise they didn't seem as strong as past Westfield teams.

I think this will play out like most people expect--Centerville winning the North comfortably and then Oscar Smith winning the state championship. But, of course, this is why they play the games because teams win on the field not on paper.

After braving the cold and wind the past couple weeks I think I completely agree with your thoughts, and look forward to attending a great game in Charlottesville that honestly leaves a razor-thin margin for error from either Centreville or Oscar Smith if they want to come home happy.

Definitely seemed to be a couple of bad calls. The change in momentum was palpable. If the LB kids had been able to shake off the mistake, they might have not choked. It had been a while since they had a close game. It was a lot of pressure.

I also attended the game today and saw a much different game. I thought westfield gave away the game in the first half. They were dominant on offense. Terrible play calling in the red zone killed them. Their coordinator really needs to open it up a bit. The westfield of old would have scored on both their opportunities and would have won that game easily. It should have been at least 14 to 14 at half. The opening drive westfield ran the ball at will and threw a nice pass down inside the five. Four runs later and no score. I'm not saying they needed to take the 3- I agree with going for it. I just hated the selection. Lb just brought a ton of pressure and gave them no shot. Then again with 1st and goal and penalty moved them back to goal and 17 to go. He finally calls a pass, a boot, opposite of his throwing hand forcing the qb to throw across his body and be picked. Didn't like it. Later in the game they started getting the ball to #1 on quick bubbles and a few deep balls. They were doing great things. After the half they never came back to those things. It was like after 22 got hurt, they got super conservative. The fb who moved to rb played his butt off. He was gassed. Get some play action or some regular passes to lighten his load. Even the westfield fans were screaming to thrown the ball.

At the end the block kick returned for a score was an amazing play. Westfield plays great D and gets the ball back. Henderson did have to come off for being on the sideline after a time out not his helmet coming off. The timeout would have allowed him to return after the helmet coming off - just like blood. Westfield has a huge run down the sideline and then scores. The pat was not blocked or tipped like previously told, the kid pushed it wide. I was standing in the corner of the track in that end zone. They did run into him and then there were multiple more flags because lb kept trying to fake the jump over the center (you can't run up to the line and stomp your feet before the snap). Braddock gets the ball back and was sacked multiple times to end it.

So in conclusion I thought westfield should have won all around. If Braddock would have held on to win I would have said westfield lost the game because of play calling.

Also - if you are Braddock why not get the ball to 24 more. He is a man and I doubt westfield could have covered him all game. He was open the majority of the time but Henderson never looked his way.

Two years in a row where the play selection has caused problems in big games. Last year against Oakton the play calling was awful. Today it was just as bad. Coach fired Shannon after last season because of it, he might need to do the same this year. There are a lot of old head coaches on the staff - let one of them call the plays.

Read the rules he came off for losing his helmet and the 2nd string qb went in and off and then back in he should have missed that play also. Funny Braddock fan saw the game one way and westfield fan another the truth wassomewhere in the middle ofboth of there observations. Had to be painful leading 16 to 3 with 5 + to go and tasting victory only to be sitting home next weekend with the other losers after going 12 and 0 with a tranfer stud qb and a under utilized stud receiver

Really............ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I also attended the game today and saw a much
> different game. I thought westfield gave away the
> game in the first half. They were dominant on
> offense. Terrible play calling in the red zone
> killed them. Their coordinator really needs to
> open it up a bit. The westfield of old would have
> scored on both their opportunities and would have
> won that game easily. It should have been at least
> 14 to 14 at half. The opening drive westfield ran
> the ball at will and threw a nice pass down inside
> the five. Four runs later and no score. I'm not
> saying they needed to take the 3- I agree with
> going for it. I just hated the selection. Lb just
> brought a ton of pressure and gave them no shot.
> Then again with 1st and goal and penalty moved
> them back to goal and 17 to go. He finally calls a
> pass, a boot, opposite of his throwing hand
> forcing the qb to throw across his body and be
> picked. Didn't like it. Later in the game they
> started getting the ball to #1 on quick bubbles
> and a few deep balls. They were doing great
> things. After the half they never came back to
> those things. It was like after 22 got hurt, they
> got super conservative. The fb who moved to rb
> played his butt off. He was gassed. Get some play
> action or some regular passes to lighten his load.
> Even the westfield fans were screaming to thrown
> the ball.
>
> At the end the block kick returned for a score was
> an amazing play. Westfield plays great D and gets
> the ball back. Henderson did have to come off for
> being on the sideline after a time out not his
> helmet coming off. The timeout would have allowed
> him to return after the helmet coming off - just
> like blood. Westfield has a huge run down the
> sideline and then scores. The pat was not blocked
> or tipped like previously told, the kid pushed it
> wide. I was standing in the corner of the track in
> that end zone. They did run into him and then
> there were multiple more flags because lb kept
> trying to fake the jump over the center (you can't
> run up to the line and stomp your feet before the
> snap). Braddock gets the ball back and was sacked
> multiple times to end it.
>
> So in conclusion I thought westfield should have
> won all around. If Braddock would have held on to
> win I would have said westfield lost the game
> because of play calling.
>
> Also - if you are Braddock why not get the ball to
> 24 more. He is a man and I doubt westfield could
> have covered him all game. He was open the
> majority of the time but Henderson never looked
> his way.


Thank you Westfield for making this easy! We are going to kick your ass, just like last time only worse. You may score this time, but we will have the second team in by the 3rd Qrt.

Someone tell me why this time will be different. Centreville is going to embarass Westfield next Saturday at Centreville, everyone come out and watch!

Really............ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I just hated the selection. Lb just
> brought a ton of pressure and gave them no shot.


braddock brought NO pressure. Don't recall them blitzing hardly at all. Regardless of your affinity for the playcalling, if a team can gain yards on the ground at will (Like westfield did in the second half) they aren't going to change.

CvilleBacker wrote;

"Someone tell me why this time will be different. Centreville is going to embarass Westfield next Saturday at Centreville, everyone come out and watch!"

First, I doubt you're a Centreville football player, especially a LB. Coach Newell is an awesome coach and his players certainly have more class. Second, why would you taunt your opponent, especially a district rival, anything can and will happen in a rivalry game. Third, please don't rest your prediction based on the last game, Westfield had 8 starters out in that game, they were the LT, RG, both DT's, DE, both MLB's, DB. Oh, and their QB was playing his first game back recovering from a concussion so I think this game might be a bit closer than most think. Point is, if you actually play for Centreville why would you be that stupid to offer bulletin board material? Don't think the Kids don't know what gets put on here!

Fan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CvilleBacker wrote;
>
> "Someone tell me why this time will be different.
> Centreville is going to embarass Westfield next
> Saturday at Centreville, everyone come out and
> watch!"
>
> First, I doubt you're a Centreville football
> player, especially a LB. Coach Newell is an
> awesome coach and his players certainly have more
> class. Second, why would you taunt your opponent,
> especially a district rival, anything can and will
> happen in a rivalry game. Third, please don't rest
> your prediction based on the last game, Westfield
> had 8 starters out in that game, they were the LT,
> RG, both DT's, DE, both MLB's, DB. Oh, and their
> QB was playing his first game back recovering from
> a concussion so I think this game might be a bit
> closer than most think. Point is, if you actually
> play for Centreville why would you be that stupid
> to offer bulletin board material? Don't think the
> Kids don't know what gets put on here!


no kids read this fucking site

who are you kidding?

Point was if you're playing in the game don't talk shit. However I doubt this idiot does because he would know better!