I'm clipped. My son is due to shoot out in a few weeks and we're having the discussion. We're both in agreement to clip him but, is there any reason not to?

pain and suffering from the constant ridicule of having a little more penis than the competition.

Attachments:

Millions of nerve endings are in the foreskin, which help make the penis thousands of times more sensitive than it is once it's circumcised; sex is a greatly enhanced experience for males who are uncircumcised. If you are circumcised and disagree, then shut your mouth...you will never know how much you're missing. Do your son a solid. Don't lop the tip of his dick off. He'll thank you when he's older, and banging broads. Never mind that it's barbaric and rooted in the most archaic and idiotic of religious traditions.

Any man who says they don't want their son to be 'different' and made fun of by the other boys for not being curcumsized is a gay man. Don't worry about other boys looking at your son's dick. Think about how awesomer sex will be for him by keeping his dick intact.

Wow...well, being clipped I had no clue. Ok, we'll go for the unclipped and he can clip it later if he wants...

It's the most horrible thing to see one a day old baby. It's really not nessacery anymore and you'll regret it the minute you change his diaper and see it all swollen and red....I didn't make the decision, I left it to Dad..I wish I hadn't let them do it. It didn't really bother the lil guy, but I'll never be able to forget :/ And I've seen clipped, unclipped and half clipped(don't know why on that one), a lil extra skin doesn't make it very 'different', but it does make it more pleasurable for him ;)

Depends.

Do you want your kid to have that sexy/exotic European look? Or do you want him to have a boring looking helmet head like me and 90% of other dudes in America?

Since circumcision is still pretty common here (although it's declining rapidly I read), you might want to get him cut because American females are pretty retarded and may freak out if they see an uncut cock. At which point you'll actually be doing him a favor since European women > vomit inducing American chicks.

I personally wish I was uncut.

Uncut equals more bacteria and if a baby/toddler/child equals more compacted shit nuggets that will inflame your son's junk. Best to have it trimmed because to have done later is really inconsiderate and he may regret you.

I'm uncut. That stuff started back when humans bathed maybe once a year. What's the point of it now? I'll never do that to myself. Let your son also make the choice for himself. Its not as rare as it once was here in the states.

Also, no chick has ever freaked out on me. Its the same thing, you just pull the skin back if you want your head to show. Makes bjs great.

Ever seen a Jewish circumcision (Jews are required to be circumcised)? You hire a 'mohel' to perform the deed at a 'bris' in front of as many of your loved ones as your mother-in-law insists be there (**ahem**). Then you party.

My son was apparently presented in the wrong direction to the mohel. As he put it, "I'm performing a circumcision, not a nose job." I couldn't watch.

it also makes for a super easy clean-up with mastrurbation. just pinch the skin together when you wanna cum and drop it directly into the toilet bowel. no fuss no muss.

Everyone seems to want to look like porn stars do... women are trimming their parts and bleaching their browneyes. Rarely ever do you see uncut on porn, and if the trend is starting NOW to look like porn stars then this is the exact wrong time for uncut. Yeah he can do it later but as an adult you want your junk cut?

Pics or gtfo

As a nation, we just love our genital mutilation. I say "Snip-Snip!"

Cut that thang.

Women everywhere will thank you.

Snip it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cut that thang.
>
> Women everywhere will thank you.

I'd say DON'T do it. Why fuck with mother nature? However, I myself, having a cut cock, don't suffer from any lack of pleasure or any erectile dysfunction issues. Since I was done at birth, I'm sure my monkey brain has compensated and rewired.

Funny thing, if you go to Asia, they LOVE the cut cock. No cheese dick.

NewDad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm clipped. My son is due to shoot out in a few
> weeks and we're having the discussion. We're both
> in agreement to clip him but, is there any reason
> not to?


It's the equivalent of cutting the clit off of a woman.

You know how much it hurts to bit your cheek? Well the nerve ending density in your (nonexistent) foreskin is greater than in your cheek. Think about how much pain you are forcing on an unwilling child.

If you do it, you are a sick fuck. Sure, the child might not remember the pain, but do you shoot a dog in the ass before you shoot it in the head to put it down? No, not unless you are a sick fuck.

Circumcision is absolutely fucking disgusting and barbaric, UNLESS it's medically necessary in which case a doctor will tell you so, then it's ok. But there's no reason to cut another dude's dick just because others do it.


Please sir, if you really do love your child, you will read up on it and not just ask in this retarded shit hole of a forum.

http://www.circumcision.org/index.html

start here.

then watch this video






DO YOU LIKE THE SOUND OF THE BABY CRYING YOU SICK FUCK?

I bet you do.

Also, I'm uncut and no girls have ever said anything negative about it. I told one of my girlfriends and she didn't even believe that I was uncut.

But let's go over the pros and cons right quick of NOT cutting

Pros:
sex feels better for him
you're not mutilating a baby
it's natural

cons:
he has to clean it a bit more

BTDT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Snip it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Cut that thang.
> >
> > Women everywhere will thank you.
>
> I'd say DON'T do it. Why fuck with mother nature?
> However, I myself, having a cut cock, don't suffer
> from any lack of pleasure or any erectile
> dysfunction issues. Since I was done at birth, I'm
> sure my monkey brain has compensated and rewired.
>
> Funny thing, if you go to Asia, they LOVE the cut
> cock. No cheese dick.


No, your stupid fucking monkey brain has not rewired itself. You lost millions of nerve endings, the most dense area of nerve endings in your body. You cannot regain that ever. You think you have compensated but you will NEVER know what you have lost. How awful is that? It's something you never had a chance at because some barbaric parent decided that it's his duty to cut off a part of your body.

meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NewDad Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I'm clipped. My son is due to shoot out in a
> few
> > weeks and we're having the discussion. We're
> both
> > in agreement to clip him but, is there any
> reason
> > not to?
>
>
> It's the equivalent of cutting the clit off of a
> woman.
>
> You know how much it hurts to bit your cheek? Well
> the nerve ending density in your (nonexistent)
> foreskin is greater than in your cheek. Think
> about how much pain you are forcing on an
> unwilling child.
>
> If you do it, you are a sick fuck. Sure, the child
> might not remember the pain, but do you shoot a
> dog in the ass before you shoot it in the head to
> put it down? No, not unless you are a sick fuck.
>
> Circumcision is absolutely fucking disgusting and
> barbaric, UNLESS it's medically necessary in which
> case a doctor will tell you so, then it's ok. But
> there's no reason to cut another dude's dick just
> because others do it.
>
>
> Please sir, if you really do love your child, you
> will read up on it and not just ask in this
> retarded shit hole of a forum.
>
> http://www.circumcision.org/index.html
>
> start here.
>
> then watch this video
>
>
>
>
>
>
> DO YOU LIKE THE SOUND OF THE BABY CRYING YOU SICK
> FUCK?
>
> I bet you do.
>
> Also, I'm uncut and no girls have ever said
> anything negative about it. I told one of my
> girlfriends and she didn't even believe that I was
> uncut.
>
> But let's go over the pros and cons right quick of
> NOT cutting
>
> Pros:
> sex feels better for him
> you're not mutilating a baby
> it's natural
>
> cons:
> he has to clean it a bit more


Con:

You've got a dog dick.

Women hate that shit. They just don't want to tell you.

meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BTDT Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Snip it Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Cut that thang.
> > >
> > > Women everywhere will thank you.
> >
> > I'd say DON'T do it. Why fuck with mother
> nature?
> > However, I myself, having a cut cock, don't
> suffer
> > from any lack of pleasure or any erectile
> > dysfunction issues. Since I was done at birth,
> I'm
> > sure my monkey brain has compensated and
> rewired.
> >
> > Funny thing, if you go to Asia, they LOVE the
> cut
> > cock. No cheese dick.
>
>
> No, your stupid fucking monkey brain has not
> rewired itself. You lost millions of nerve
> endings, the most dense area of nerve endings in
> your body. You cannot regain that ever. You think
> you have compensated but you will NEVER know what
> you have lost. How awful is that? It's something
> you never had a chance at because some barbaric
> parent decided that it's his duty to cut off a
> part of your body.


Fuck, chill. Jihad much?

I didn't have a choice and *if* you read my whole message I advocated NOT cutting.

Based on the number of chicks that have jumped on my cock, marveled at it's "perfection" and come back for more, I'm not exactly dwelling on what I never knew I've been missing. I don't suffer from E.D. nor premature ejaculation so perhaps I'm a lucky one.

Carry on.

aap is changing their recommendation to do it on monday , stay tuned.


http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/american-pediatricians-endorse-circumcision/


No one had regretted getting out but many regret not getting it done.

Both my boys are and honestly the last one screamed more from the child episodic prep wipe.

Genital mutilation, yeah that's a good idea!

At least female circumcision isn't practiced traditionally in the U.S.

Cut it out Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Both my boys are and honestly the last one
> screamed more from the child episodic prep wipe.

so why did you have them cut?

Lol it has gone way over board with retard hippies and loony anti circ crowd. I present the latest in retardation http://www.intactamerica.org/

It's mutilation of a baby's genitals. Yeah, tradition. Doesn't mean it's right or necessary.


Give me one logical reason for cutting foreskins?
Yes, there are rare occurrences where it needs to be done, but outside of those, why?

penile support group much? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> meh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Cut it out Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > Both my boys are and honestly the last one
> > > screamed more from the child episodic prep
> > wipe.
> >
> > so why did you have them cut?
>
>
> Because she is an evil bitch of a mom who wants to
> have sons who incessantly cry about having it done
> on the internet like you do.


Typical idiot anon who can't read the part where I wrote "I'm uncut..." etc etc

Abstract:

"Male circumcision is a common procedure, generally performed during the newborn period in the United States. In 2007, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) formed a multidisciplinary task force of AAP members and other stakeholders to evaluate the recent evidence on male circumcision and update the Academy’s 1999 recommendations in this area. Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure’s benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits identified included prevention of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. The Am erican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has endorsed this statement.

Policy Statement

Systematic evaluation of English-language peer-reviewed literature from 1995 through 2010 indicates that preventive health benefits of elective circumcision of male newborns outweigh the risks of the procedure. Benefits include significant reductions in the risk of urinary tract infection in the first year of life and, subsequently, in the risk of heterosexual acquisition of HIV and the transmission of other sexually transmitted infections.

The procedure is well tolerated when performed by trained professionals under sterile conditions with appropriate pain management. Complications are infrequent; most are minor, and severe complications are rare. Male circumcision performed during the newborn period has considerably lower complication rates than when performed later in life.

Although health benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns, the benefits of circumcision are sufficient to justify access to this procedure for families choosing it and to warrant third-party payment for circumcision of male newborns. It is important that clinicians routinely inform parents of the health benefits and risks of male newborn circumcision in an unbiased and accurate manner.

Parents ultimately should decide whether circumcision is in the best interests of their male child. They will need to weigh medical information in the context of their own religious, ethical, and cultural beliefs and practices. The medical benefits alone may not outweigh these other considerations for individual families."

A leaked copy of the new American Academy of Pediatrics’ policy statement on circumcision, scheduled to be released on Monday, reveals a change in the prestigious medical body’s previous position (set in 1999) on the medical benefits of the procedure from “neutral” to “pro.” It details how a comprehensive evaluation of research from the last 15 years demonstrates that the medical benefits of circumcision—including “prevention of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and transmission of some sexually transmitted infections”—outweigh the risks.

Take that dog dicks.

Haaaaaaaa alot of guys will be stuck with nasty stinky sad hidden std cheese penises cause mommy didn't use science.

future chicks will continue to refuse that nastiness.

Anyone who is cut doesn't know what they're missing. As an uncut man, I can't even walk around with my head exposed in boxers without feeling uncomfortable. The brushing of the fabric is too much. I don't know how you do it but I guess sometime in your early years you eventually lost sensitivity and now you're okay with it. You were robbed of pleasure my friends.

And for those who say the chicks are disgusted, I'm sure there are some that are weirdos about it, but I've bagged many repeat customers and they don't care one bit. When I get hard the skin slides back off the head. Looks like a cut dick at that point but because its lived its entire life covered by a hood, only pulled out for showering, banging and sometimes both at once, its as nature intended.

Meebhs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone who is cut doesn't know what they're
> missing. As an uncut man, I can't even walk around
> with my head exposed in boxers without feeling
> uncomfortable. The brushing of the fabric is too
> much. I don't know how you do it but I guess
> sometime in your early years you eventually lost
> sensitivity and now you're okay with it. You were
> robbed of pleasure my friends.
>
> And for those who say the chicks are disgusted,
> I'm sure there are some that are weirdos about it,
> but I've bagged many repeat customers and they
> don't care one bit. When I get hard the skin
> slides back off the head. Looks like a cut dick at
> that point but because its lived its entire life
> covered by a hood, only pulled out for showering,
> banging and sometimes both at once, its as nature
> intended.

Too bad you have to hide your stink sock penis and keep it out of the hood

I recall a Seinfeld episode where Elaine said an uncut one "had no face, no personality" I have also heard the foreskin is reportedly a breeding ground for the HPV and women are more likely to be infected that way.

Funny how the most defensive are the ones that have no say in the matter. Mutilated suckers.

0tter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Funny how the most defensive are the ones that
> have no say in the matter. Mutilated suckers.


What's funny is your nasty ass dog dick. lmao

0tter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Funny how the most defensive are the ones that
> have no say in the matter. Mutilated suckers.

Funny, it seems to me that the ones who aren't cut are on some sort of catholic jihad, even going so far as to deride and ridicule those who had no choice in the matter. It smacks of some sort of inadequacy on their part. What are they trying to prove that their intact foreskin compensates for their short cocks?

Who do the Jews clip their boys as part of their religion? What's religious about having no foreskin?

Uncirc have dick cheese gross, The problem, and the stigma, comes from the breakdown of the fat from bacteria, which can release a foul odor. Dirt, lint, dead cells, semen, and piss can also play a role in why smegma can smell terrible.

Hd7216hd72165566 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uncirc have dick cheese gross, The problem, and
> the stigma, comes from the breakdown of the fat
> from bacteria, which can release a foul odor.
> Dirt, lint, dead cells, semen, and piss can also
> play a role in why smegma can smell terrible.

It's called a shower! I've had uncut men, they didn't stink, didn't have smegma, lint, etc....that said, nah, I wouldn't touch it if it did, but that's more a failure of personal hygeine. I mean, I wash my pussy, don't ya'll wash your dicks? It shouldn't be that hard to do, foreskin or no.

And again, my son is cut. But that was Daddy'd decision and after I saw it all red and swollen, I wished I'd said no, even if it only lasted a couple days, it looked so sore :/

JenK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hd7216hd72165566 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Uncirc have dick cheese gross, The problem, and
> > the stigma, comes from the breakdown of the fat
> > from bacteria, which can release a foul odor.
> > Dirt, lint, dead cells, semen, and piss can
> also
> > play a role in why smegma can smell terrible.
>
> It's called a shower! I've had uncut men, they
> didn't stink, didn't have smegma, lint,
> etc....that said, nah, I wouldn't touch it if it
> did, but that's more a failure of personal
> hygeine. I mean, I wash my pussy, don't ya'll
> wash your dicks? It shouldn't be that hard to do,
> foreskin or no.
>
> And again, my son is cut. But that was Daddy'd
> decision and after I saw it all red and swollen, I
> wished I'd said no, even if it only lasted a
> couple days, it looked so sore :/

He wont remember hes fine.


"Regarding newborn circumcision, most physicians today agree with the practice of informing parents of the risks and benefits of the procedure in an unbiased manner. Recently, however, several large studies revealed a 60% decrease in HIV transmission in circumcised males compared to uncircumcised males. This may ultimately influence some changes in recommendations in the near future."

"Boys who are not circumcised as newborns may later have circumcision for the treatment of phimosis, paraphimosis, or balanoposthitis. When done after the newborn period, circumcision is considerably more complicated. "

Mine looks cut when I'm hard and it's not overly sensitive or anything like that. Never had any issues with it and the ladies seem happy. I like it.

 

I think it's easier to jack off also

 

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mine looks cut when I'm hard and it's not overly
> sensitive or anything like that.




Ugh. Nobody here needed to hear that.

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think it's easier to jack off also



GROSS!

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> friskydingo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I think it's easier to jack off also
>
>
>
> GROSS!


Just sayin!

Like I don't ever need to use lube

 

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > friskydingo Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I think it's easier to jack off also
> >
> >
> >
> > GROSS!
>
>
> Just sayin!
>
> Like I don't ever need to use lube
Attachments:

Just want the op to make an informed decision

 

Wanna see a pic !?!?

 

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wanna see a pic !?!?
Attachments:

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wanna see a pic !?!?
Attachments:

A circumcision is a routine procedure for a newborn. Saw it done several times for my boys and it went quickly and they got over the procedure soon thereafter. A circumcision has health benefits for both the young man and his sexual partners when it comes to STDs, HIV, and cervical cancer.

Talk to some old soldiers / sailors who (50 -60 years ago, when circumcision for new borns wasn't so common), would get the procedure as an adult because they were tired of their dick getting all funky. Not fun when you're an adult.

Honestly I've never experienced this funky problem you talk about.

I'd imagine if one didn't bathe for days that would happen...

 

Uncut dicks are only good for taking pics of foreskin stretching.

Ewwwww

 

meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the equivalent of cutting the clit off of a
> woman.

No, it is not.

Wow, a lot of heated debate on this one. Amazing how personal it can be for people and families.

Personally, I remember researching this in my early twenties in college before the internet, and while circumcision was still the standard. It was pretty hard to look it up in books in those days but I was always a good researcher. I now think I was lucky I escaped all the nutty "advocates" for both sides because everything I found was in the medical industry with either a medical or a medical-historical bent and no "cultural" or "social" "advocating" like has become a huge issue now days, is all over the internet, and is being demonstrated in this thread. Because NO ONE WOULD DARE TALK ABOUT IT BACK THEN (except doctors & the medical industry) - it was a silent subject socially & culturally. I mean my parents never even told me or discussed it with me. I had to figure out for myself in the school gym showers that my penis didn't come that way "out of the box". But at some time in my college & twenties it occurred to me that circumcision (for american non-jews) could not have been standardized beyond the era of when everyone had their babies in hospitals, which as a civilization was relatively new, I mean not like even a 100 years. So I wanted to know, when did this medical procedure become standard in America and why did it become standard?

What I came across back then, medically & medically-historically, with no social or cultural advocating what so ever, was that the United States made it standard in hospitals around World War I because it made men more combat-ready & maintenance-free soldiers because they would be stuck in fox holes & camps & such & such for extended periods of time without showers, changing clothes, or changing underwear, all depending on ones circumstances (and I suppose if you became a POW this circumstance could resume even today). And circumcision was kept standard from then on, as a measure in American preparation for war & the draft. It is also interesting to note when our individual priorities changed as a nation and they 'snuck' this on us. Also running water was not as wide spread and people could not bathe as frequently as they can now. That is a hell of of long time to 'just keep doing it' though. The medical logs of the time, stated that medically circumcision was no longer necessary for hygiene now days with running water and bathing common several times a week, every other day, even every single day. Because of that, insurance plans more recently began to not cover the cost of circumcision as it was no longer deemed a "mandatory" medical expense but an "optional" expense of choice. Which many parents paid extra for on their own, just to continue the tradition and emulate the father. But many began not to, and that is why the trend is moving towards uncut now days with some social & cultural inertia. Ultimately it was all about the government saving money - if they could save money clipping your dick before widespread running water, they made it standard; if they could save money by not clipping your dick anymore in an age of widespread running water, they made that standard. I was not really taken in by the aspect that I was circumcised mainly because my country felt it made me a more combat-ready and a low-maintenance soldier. Especially if it was so archaic that it was no longer necessary in the day&age of running water with regular showering (I have read they don't give those vaccinations on the upper arm either, I also have one of those from the old days).

Both sides/'advocates should consider this... I have checked out women's preferences on different sites. As usual, men are far more preoccupied by their penises, than women are. It's a guy thing, the women don't care. We obsess about it and we imagine they do to. While most of what I saw was just checkbox type polls, where women didn't have to speak to it, when women did speak to it, most expressed dismay that we thought it could ever be a "deal-breaker" one way or the other. Some said, if a women said she liked you better, as many men on both sides maintained, that she would have probably placating you and would have said that for cut or uncut. *lol* and why not? it makes perfect sense - oh yeah, honey, what ever you got is what I like *lol* and that men were simply reading way to much into it. (things are so much funnier when you see the whole picture... ie, women don't care, and are just placating us, because we are the ones obsessing about it)

For the cut-crowd, pediatrics who tell you circumcision prevents STDs etc... that is only if you don't bath... and they have a conflict of interest and are selling you medical procedures to pay for their boat. It hasn't been that way in a long, long, time. So if your gung-hoe on your kid having a "porno-penis" just say it, but stop with the STD rants because its hogwash. There is a new invention called "running water".

Finally, some of the progressive jews have stopped doing circumcision because in the modern era with running water & showers, they see it as both unnecessary and excessive. They have even invented a new ceremony of the covenant as replacement ceremony for the traditional circumcision.

There was also an interesting legal case recently in Germany where a doctor refused to do post-natal circumcision on a four year old mulsim boy, claiming he could not medically recommend it, and the integrity of the childs body over-rode the desire of the fanatical muslim parents to have their child circumcised for personal & religious reasons. And that if the circumcision is not a part of the standard natal process, the child has the right to make that choice as a consenting adult at age 18. The fanatical muslim parents took the doctor & hospital to court, but the court upheld the decision.

This also brings up an interesting point, of religion using circumcision as a method to claim, mark, & brainwash a child for life, before they are cognizant of their religion or its beliefs.

I mean I am circumcised and not gung-ho about it either way. I think those who are adamant either way are the crackpots (extremists are the danger). Culturally I think we are in a transition period, the future is going au naturale, (think of all the fun your college-teen will have piercing it, or god knows tatooing it, or what every college kids are coming up with by then). But there is no need for circumcision anymore, those days were long gone before the contraception era, if you *want* it done, admit it is just for looks and that's what you want.

tik tik tik tik

Signatures are for fags

ay bay bay

Signatures are for fags

meh, you's trifling

Signatures are for fags

AIDS, indeed...

Signatures are for fags

And the debate goes on.

Otter dear,

There's a reason I dumped your ass. It's your dick. Not only is it ugly to look at, but it's way too small to satisfy. Stop lying to yourself. None of us liked it. That's why we break up with you within a couple of weeks of having sex with you. Get a clue.

Love,

Kris (yeah, that Kris)

friskydingo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mine looks cut when I'm hard and it's not overly
> sensitive or anything like that. Never had any
> issues with it and the ladies seem happy. I like
> it.


jhat do you know? Frisky has a gross uncut dog dick and so does our british mikey.

just put that in with the 524345 other "coincidences"