Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:35AM
She's consoled, no doubt, by the knowledge that she can continue to damage to our nation from her Congressional seat.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Wall Street is typically thought of as investment banking
and banking and we were not an investment bank or a bank.
But we were in the financial services sector generally,"
Romney said. "I am not a Wall Street guy, classically
defined.” - Willard "Mitt" Romney, December 29, 2011.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Wall Street is typically thought of as investment banking
and banking and we were not an investment bank or a bank.
But we were in the financial services sector generally,"
Romney said. "I am not a Wall Street guy, classically
defined.” - Willard "Mitt" Romney, December 29, 2011.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
TheMeeper
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:46AM
She's quitting so she can spend more time around the mental ward.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:49AM
Or perhaps to keep her hysterically effeminate husband from relapsing.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
HayZeus Vargas
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:51AM
Looking forward to the Playboy shoot so she pay off her campaign debts.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
More Complete
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:52AM
No surprise. She never had a chance to begin with.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
shut it, commies
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:56AM
I thought she was the lunatic tea party darling that the republicans were sure to nominate? What happened to all the liberal asshats predicting a tea party surge would save their precious Barak? Idiots, all of you.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:56AM
More Complete Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No surprise. She never had a chance to begin with.
None of them did/do. Regardless the GOP nominee, President
Obama will win re-election.
-------------------------------------------------------
> No surprise. She never had a chance to begin with.
None of them did/do. Regardless the GOP nominee, President
Obama will win re-election.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
TheMeeper
()
Date: January 04, 2012 11:56AM
HayZeus Vargas Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> she pay
> off her campaign debts.
She'll probably use the money from her inevitable book deal.
-------------------------------------------------------
> she pay
> off her campaign debts.
She'll probably use the money from her inevitable book deal.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Kittie
()
Date: January 04, 2012 12:00PM
I have a feeling Michelle and her crazy talk will not disappear after this anyway.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
More Complete
()
Date: January 04, 2012 12:01PM
The Other Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> None of them did/do. Regardless the GOP nominee,
> President
> Obama will win re-election.
While many will disagree with you, I'm not going to debate that. What I meant is that she never had a chance to win as the republican nominee.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> None of them did/do. Regardless the GOP nominee,
> President
> Obama will win re-election.
While many will disagree with you, I'm not going to debate that. What I meant is that she never had a chance to win as the republican nominee.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: January 04, 2012 12:27PM
shut it, commies Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought she was the lunatic tea party darling
> that the republicans were sure to nominate? What
> happened to all the liberal asshats predicting a
> tea party surge would save their precious Barak?
> Idiots, all of you.
The GOP will nominate Romney (aka McCain, aka Dole). The base will be too bored to turn out for this stiff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought she was the lunatic tea party darling
> that the republicans were sure to nominate? What
> happened to all the liberal asshats predicting a
> tea party surge would save their precious Barak?
> Idiots, all of you.
The GOP will nominate Romney (aka McCain, aka Dole). The base will be too bored to turn out for this stiff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
sleepy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 12:33PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> shut it, commies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I thought she was the lunatic tea party darling
> > that the republicans were sure to nominate?
> What
> > happened to all the liberal asshats predicting
> a
> > tea party surge would save their precious
> Barak?
> > Idiots, all of you.
>
>
> The GOP will nominate Romney (aka McCain, aka
> Dole). The base will be too bored to turn out for
> this stiff.
LOL. This is your new pick for the nominee. It has been changing so often, it is hard to keep up. I guess a blind squirrel does find a nit once in a while.
The problem with your base theory is that the base will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic after seeing his performance. Compound that with the fact that barely any of the 2008 first time voters will re-materialize and it spells trouble for Obama.
-------------------------------------------------------
> shut it, commies Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I thought she was the lunatic tea party darling
> > that the republicans were sure to nominate?
> What
> > happened to all the liberal asshats predicting
> a
> > tea party surge would save their precious
> Barak?
> > Idiots, all of you.
>
>
> The GOP will nominate Romney (aka McCain, aka
> Dole). The base will be too bored to turn out for
> this stiff.
LOL. This is your new pick for the nominee. It has been changing so often, it is hard to keep up. I guess a blind squirrel does find a nit once in a while.
The problem with your base theory is that the base will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic after seeing his performance. Compound that with the fact that barely any of the 2008 first time voters will re-materialize and it spells trouble for Obama.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 12:53PM
sleepy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I guess a blind squirrel does find a nut once in
> a while.
A perfect description of the GOP!
> The problem with your base theory is that the base
> will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's
> base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic
> after seeing his performance. Compound that with
> the fact that barely any of the 2008 first time
> voters will re-materialize and it spells trouble
> for Obama.
You know, opinions are like assholes...
You're certainly entitled to yours, but I disagree.
I've seen no indication that the GOP base is fired
up. If it was, there would have been a far larger
turnout last night in Iowa. Maybe, back in the
2009 - 2010 teabagger heyday, they WERE fired-up,
but today?
-------------------------------------------------------
> I guess a blind squirrel does find a nut once in
> a while.
A perfect description of the GOP!
> The problem with your base theory is that the base
> will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's
> base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic
> after seeing his performance. Compound that with
> the fact that barely any of the 2008 first time
> voters will re-materialize and it spells trouble
> for Obama.
You know, opinions are like assholes...
You're certainly entitled to yours, but I disagree.
I've seen no indication that the GOP base is fired
up. If it was, there would have been a far larger
turnout last night in Iowa. Maybe, back in the
2009 - 2010 teabagger heyday, they WERE fired-up,
but today?
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Democrat Against Insanity
()
Date: January 04, 2012 01:04PM
> The problem with your base theory is that the base
> will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's
> base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic
> after seeing his performance.
Don't bet on that. A lot of us are more motivated to go to the polls by the need to prevent bat shit crazy Republicans from taking over the country than by the desire to reelect Obama. If Romney were actually allowed to be Romney, then he might not be so bad. But the nutjobs won't allow that, and Romney will allow them to determine his agenda.
> will show up to vote against Obama and Obama's
> base is the one that will fail to be enthusiastic
> after seeing his performance.
Don't bet on that. A lot of us are more motivated to go to the polls by the need to prevent bat shit crazy Republicans from taking over the country than by the desire to reelect Obama. If Romney were actually allowed to be Romney, then he might not be so bad. But the nutjobs won't allow that, and Romney will allow them to determine his agenda.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
sleepy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 01:05PM
The Other Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know, opinions are like assholes...
I don't think I would ever confuse you with an opinion.
> You're certainly entitled to yours, but I
> disagree.
Of course you do. But, more importantly, why do I care that you are confused
> I've seen no indication that the GOP base is
> fired
> up. If it was, there would have been a far
> larger
> turnout last night in Iowa.
Not necessarily. Voting FOR someone is vastly different than voting AGAINST Obama.
> Maybe, back in the
> 2009 - 2010 teabagger heyday, they WERE fired-up,
> but today?
Polls indicate the GOP holds a 5-10 point advantage in voter enthusiasm. Couple that with a huge swing by independents away from Obama and the 2008 first timers not showing up, Obama will be in for a real fight to the end.
If Obama is going to do so well, and you are so confident of his victory, these two questions will be easy to answer:
1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in 2008? Which one(s)?
2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he won in 2008?
-------------------------------------------------------
> You know, opinions are like assholes...
I don't think I would ever confuse you with an opinion.
> You're certainly entitled to yours, but I
> disagree.
Of course you do. But, more importantly, why do I care that you are confused
> I've seen no indication that the GOP base is
> fired
> up. If it was, there would have been a far
> larger
> turnout last night in Iowa.
Not necessarily. Voting FOR someone is vastly different than voting AGAINST Obama.
> Maybe, back in the
> 2009 - 2010 teabagger heyday, they WERE fired-up,
> but today?
Polls indicate the GOP holds a 5-10 point advantage in voter enthusiasm. Couple that with a huge swing by independents away from Obama and the 2008 first timers not showing up, Obama will be in for a real fight to the end.
If Obama is going to do so well, and you are so confident of his victory, these two questions will be easy to answer:
1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in 2008? Which one(s)?
2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he won in 2008?
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 01:10PM
sleepy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in 2008?
No.
> 2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he won
> in 2008?
He will not lose any of the states he won in 2008.
That WAS easy!
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in 2008?
No.
> 2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he won
> in 2008?
He will not lose any of the states he won in 2008.
That WAS easy!
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Hatemotor
()
Date: January 04, 2012 01:14PM
I for one am stunned, she had such great ideas and vision,,,
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
sleepy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 01:55PM
The Other Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in
> 2008?
>
> No.
Wow, a correct answer from you. There may be hope for you after all.
> > 2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he
> won
> > in 2008?
>
> He will not lose any of the states he won in
> 2008.
Yes he will. He will lose any one (if not more) of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
> That WAS easy!
But, once again, you got it wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------
> sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1) Will Obama pick up any states he lost in
> 2008?
>
> No.
Wow, a correct answer from you. There may be hope for you after all.
> > 2) Which states (if any) will he lose that he
> won
> > in 2008?
>
> He will not lose any of the states he won in
> 2008.
Yes he will. He will lose any one (if not more) of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
> That WAS easy!
But, once again, you got it wrong.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: January 04, 2012 02:01PM
What the hell. One more for the road...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 03:34PM
That Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [President Obama] will lose any one (if not more)
> of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
To Romney? Santorum? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
No, he won't.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Wall Street is typically thought of as investment banking
and banking and we were not an investment bank or a bank.
But we were in the financial services sector generally,"
Romney said. "I am not a Wall Street guy, classically
defined.” - Willard "Mitt" Romney, December 29, 2011.
-------------------------------------------------------
> [President Obama] will lose any one (if not more)
> of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
To Romney? Santorum? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
No, he won't.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
“Wall Street is typically thought of as investment banking
and banking and we were not an investment bank or a bank.
But we were in the financial services sector generally,"
Romney said. "I am not a Wall Street guy, classically
defined.” - Willard "Mitt" Romney, December 29, 2011.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
The Other Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 03:36PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What the hell. One more for the road...
+1,000!
That Bachmann/Perry spinning fellatio disk bit is hysterical!!!!!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> What the hell. One more for the road...
+1,000!
That Bachmann/Perry spinning fellatio disk bit is hysterical!!!!!!!
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
This. Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:17PM
The Other Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > will lose any one (if not more)
> > of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
>
> To Romney? Santorum?
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> No, he won't.
Take it to the bank. Good money says you won't be man enough to come here on November 7, and admit to being wrong. Partly because you'll be yoo involved in your pity party and partly because you won't admit to being wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------
> That Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > will lose any one (if not more)
> > of these: FL, VA, NC, and IN.
>
> To Romney? Santorum?
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> No, he won't.
Take it to the bank. Good money says you won't be man enough to come here on November 7, and admit to being wrong. Partly because you'll be yoo involved in your pity party and partly because you won't admit to being wrong.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
This Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:24PM
sleepy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Take it to the bank.
Okay, how much imaginary coin would you like to loose?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Take it to the bank.
Okay, how much imaginary coin would you like to loose?
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
sleepy.
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:27PM
This Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Take it to the bank.
>
> Okay, how much imaginary coin would you like to
> loose?
How do I "loose" coin? If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I come on here and admit to you being correct. If the opposite happens, you admit to being wrong. On the other hand, if you want a real monetary wager, I am willing to arrange that. How much can you afford to lose?
-------------------------------------------------------
> sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Take it to the bank.
>
> Okay, how much imaginary coin would you like to
> loose?
How do I "loose" coin? If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I come on here and admit to you being correct. If the opposite happens, you admit to being wrong. On the other hand, if you want a real monetary wager, I am willing to arrange that. How much can you afford to lose?
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
sleepy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:36PM
This. Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do I "loose" coin?
See, when you proposed a bet & mentioned 'the bank',
I thought you were talking about an imaginary money wager.
> If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I come on
> here and admit to you being correct. If the opposite
> happens, you admit to being wrong.
I'm okay w/that.
> On the other hand, if you want a real monetary wager,
> I am willing to arrange that. How much can you afford
> to lose?
I'm not comfortable revealing my true, non-superhero identity
to some random nutbag on an internet blog (no offense).
-------------------------------------------------------
> How do I "loose" coin?
See, when you proposed a bet & mentioned 'the bank',
I thought you were talking about an imaginary money wager.
> If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I come on
> here and admit to you being correct. If the opposite
> happens, you admit to being wrong.
I'm okay w/that.
> On the other hand, if you want a real monetary wager,
> I am willing to arrange that. How much can you afford
> to lose?
I'm not comfortable revealing my true, non-superhero identity
to some random nutbag on an internet blog (no offense).
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
This_Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:39PM
sleepy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This. Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do I "loose" coin?
>
> See, when you proposed a bet & mentioned 'the
> bank',
> I thought you were talking about an imaginary
> money wager.
Oh, I see, you meant to say "lose." English is tough for you too?
> > If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I
> come on
> > here and admit to you being correct. If the
> opposite
> > happens, you admit to being wrong.
>
> I'm okay w/that.
Now, if you could only decide which name to post your admission under. Signing in and out too difficult for you too? Have you been so humiliated that you have had to resort to hijacking names? Ooops, looks like you are really pissed today.
> > On the other hand, if you want a real monetary
> wager,
> > I am willing to arrange that. How much can you
> afford
> > to lose?
>
> I'm not comfortable revealing my true,
> non-superhero identity
> to some random nutbag on an internet blog (no
> offense).
Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to hijack names? Or the kind that can't think of a creative way to exchange money without revealing an identity?
-------------------------------------------------------
> This. Guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > How do I "loose" coin?
>
> See, when you proposed a bet & mentioned 'the
> bank',
> I thought you were talking about an imaginary
> money wager.
Oh, I see, you meant to say "lose." English is tough for you too?
> > If Obama wins every state mentioned above, I
> come on
> > here and admit to you being correct. If the
> opposite
> > happens, you admit to being wrong.
>
> I'm okay w/that.
Now, if you could only decide which name to post your admission under. Signing in and out too difficult for you too? Have you been so humiliated that you have had to resort to hijacking names? Ooops, looks like you are really pissed today.
> > On the other hand, if you want a real monetary
> wager,
> > I am willing to arrange that. How much can you
> afford
> > to lose?
>
> I'm not comfortable revealing my true,
> non-superhero identity
> to some random nutbag on an internet blog (no
> offense).
Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to hijack names? Or the kind that can't think of a creative way to exchange money without revealing an identity?
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
This Guy
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:45PM
.sleepy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now, if you could only decide which name to post
> your admission under.
"Hello, kettle? Pot calling. You're black."
> Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to
> hijack names?
Has to? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now, if you could only decide which name to post
> your admission under.
"Hello, kettle? Pot calling. You're black."
> Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to
> hijack names?
Has to? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Truth Be Told
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:50PM
This Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Now, if you could only decide which name to
> post
> > your admission under.
>
> "Hello, kettle? Pot calling. You're black."
>
> > Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to
> > hijack names?
>
> Has to? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Look how disheveled you are today. You are hijacking names and can't even keep them straight. Are all Obama supporters as discombobulated and obsessed as you are? Again, thanks for the verification that I totally messed with your game all day. How desperate were you to make the pain stop? Looks like you were desperate enough to hijack names.
-------------------------------------------------------
> .sleepy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Now, if you could only decide which name to
> post
> > your admission under.
>
> "Hello, kettle? Pot calling. You're black."
>
> > Do you mean like a random nutbag that has to
> > hijack names?
>
> Has to? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Look how disheveled you are today. You are hijacking names and can't even keep them straight. Are all Obama supporters as discombobulated and obsessed as you are? Again, thanks for the verification that I totally messed with your game all day. How desperate were you to make the pain stop? Looks like you were desperate enough to hijack names.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Hatemotor
()
Date: January 04, 2012 04:56PM
Why does every thread turn into a flame war?
Bachmann quitting should make both sides happy,,,
Bachmann quitting should make both sides happy,,,
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
Kittie
()
Date: January 04, 2012 05:24PM
Hatemotor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why does every thread turn into a flame war?
>
> Bachmann quitting should make both sides happy,,,
Agreed.
Everyone should rejoice this cunt is gone.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why does every thread turn into a flame war?
>
> Bachmann quitting should make both sides happy,,,
Agreed.
Everyone should rejoice this cunt is gone.
Re: Bachmann Calls it Quits
Posted by:
not gone yet
()
Date: January 04, 2012 05:34PM
shes not gone her stupid book will be out