I suggest a compromise: Rather than remove the statues, leave them standing but edit the titles, adding legally factual descriptions. A statue of General Lee could be renamed (using a word beloved by Trump) “Loser Robert E. Lee.” Added to the likeness of Jefferson Davis would be “Traitor to the USA.” Mosby and his Raiders would be titled “Cowards and Murderers.” Stonewall Jackson? “Domestic Terrorist.”
Since the Confederate States of America was never officially recognized by the USA or any foreign government, its soldiers were, in the Bush administration’s definition, “unlawful enemy combatants.” In that light, is there much difference between the Army of the Potomac and al-Qaida or Hamas? Those are harsh terms, but they’ve been earned.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Rebel Rick
()
Date: December 29, 2019 09:33AM
STFU Yankee
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Butthurt demtards
()
Date: December 29, 2019 09:41AM
So funny how demtards are so triggered by inanimate objects.
Lolz!
.
Attachments:
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Chief bightingbear
()
Date: December 29, 2019 10:19AM
state view Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suggest a compromise: Rather than remove the
> statues, leave them standing but edit the titles,
> adding legally factual descriptions. A statue of
> General Lee could be renamed (using a word beloved
> by Trump) “Loser Robert E. Lee.” Added to the
> likeness of Jefferson Davis would be “Traitor to
> the USA.” Mosby and his Raiders would be titled
> “Cowards and Murderers.” Stonewall Jackson?
> “Domestic Terrorist.”
>
> Since the Confederate States of America was never
> officially recognized by the USA or any foreign
> government, its soldiers were, in the Bush
> administration’s definition, “unlawful enemy
> combatants.” In that light, is there much
> difference between the Army of the Potomac and
> al-Qaida or Hamas? Those are harsh terms, but
> they’ve been earned.
The USA was never officially recognized by anyone either. How did that turn out????
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Mod-Solutions 4 Confed Probs
()
Date: December 29, 2019 10:30AM
Augment the statues with interactive LED multi-media touch screens that provide factual documentation, photos, dates, records, correspondence, graphical depictions of the people involved and their various traitorous and criminal acts.
Show the slaves, the lynchings, murders, crimes against humanity, Andersonville, etc.
Right next to every Confederate statue, put a larger one of the Union guys who kicked their ass.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
teacher from wayback
()
Date: December 29, 2019 10:59AM
state view Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I suggest a compromise: Rather than remove the
> statues, leave them standing but edit the titles,
> adding legally factual descriptions. A statue of
> General Lee could be renamed (using a word beloved
> by Trump) “Loser Robert E. Lee.” Added to the
> likeness of Jefferson Davis would be “Traitor to
> the USA.” Mosby and his Raiders would be titled
> “Cowards and Murderers.” Stonewall Jackson?
> “Domestic Terrorist.”
>
> Since the Confederate States of America was never
> officially recognized by the USA or any foreign
> government, its soldiers were, in the Bush
> administration’s definition, “unlawful enemy
> combatants.” In that light, is there much
> difference between the Army of the Potomac and
> al-Qaida or Hamas? Those are harsh terms, but
> they’ve been earned.
That is a excellent idea! We need to show our children and grandchildren that the confederacy was nothing more than a criminal terrorist group.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Contards suck
()
Date: December 29, 2019 11:22AM
Contards hate "participation trophies" until it comes to their gay little loser statues. Statues are for winners, guys.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Gerry Recons Men’s Rooms
()
Date: December 29, 2019 11:30AM
Contards suck Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Contards hate "participation trophies" until it
> comes to their gay little loser statues. Statues
> are for winners, guys.
Nobody cares, go recon more men shitting you sick perverted faggot.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Nate Higgers
()
Date: December 29, 2019 11:36AM
Lincoln didn't things through.
Attachments:
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Mary K.
()
Date: December 29, 2019 11:47AM
Butthurt demtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So funny how demtards are so triggered by
> inanimate objects.
>
>
> Lolz!
>
>
> .
Very funny for sure.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
always liked Lincoln
()
Date: December 29, 2019 12:09PM
Lincoln makes nice cars.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
that is not a compromise
()
Date: December 29, 2019 06:48PM
a better approach is to paint them with rainbow colors.
> The USA was never officially recognized by anyone
> either. How did that turn out????
What are you mindlessly babbling about this time?
France officially recognized the United States in 1778 and the rest of the world followed suit.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Pansy Pussy Ass Confederates
()
Date: December 29, 2019 09:10PM
Great idea OP.
The statues could be great tools to teach kids how badly the south got their asses whipped.
Each statue in Richmond could include photos of how Richmond was allowed to be burned to the ground by pussy ass loser confederates.
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Lol at your future
()
Date: December 29, 2019 09:35PM
Pansy Pussy Ass Libtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> The statues could be great tools to teach kids how
> badly the south got their asses whipped.
>
You and your families chances of being murdered by one of the unions ‘Pets’ is 7 times higher than by Whites or any other race.
So tell us exactly what you “won” again?
lulz
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
Lexie.
()
Date: January 14, 2020 05:05AM
always liked Lincoln Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lincoln makes nice cars.
Do you drive one?
Re: Statue removal compromise
Posted by:
2343rdwq
()
Date: January 14, 2020 05:11PM
BLM has implemented a 2/5th compromise on statues, destroying 2/5th of any statue they haven't been arrested for approaching
I suggest a 1 acre "kill zone" around each statue - clear cut grass so guards have ample opportunity to see any BLM members racing to attack the statue