Re: 5 reasons US naval supremacy in the western pacific is doomed
Posted by:
Sun tzu
()
Date: April 14, 2019 03:43PM
PC retardzz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DIA Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We still got 20 - 30 years Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > eesh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > We have Ohio class SSBNs that can lay waste
> > to
> > > any
> > > > Chinese city.
> > >
> > >
> > > They can lay waste to the entire fucking
> > > slant-eyed country. With more than enough
> > ICBM's
> > > to spare to take on the Rooshkies if needed.
> > And
> > > that's just our subs.
> >
> > The Chinese have those things to
>
> No they don't.
>
> Israel has 8 nuclear equipped subs by itself.
> That's why Iran can't attack Israel.. They will
> be incinerated.
>
> The USA has 8 times the sea power of China and
> Russia combined. China and Russia also have to
> deal with the navys of Great Britain, Australia,
> Japan, France, Canada, South Korea, Indonesia,
> Colombia, Finland , India.
>
> 3 of which are nuclear.
>
> Britain is the second most powerful in the world
> begging the far ahead USA. India is right behind
> China. Columbia and Finland have very strong
> navies. Japan can be mobilized quickly by the USA
> which would totally fuck up China. South Korea
> already has them pissed. Canada, Australia can go
> nuclear at a moments notice. France and Israel can
> destroy the earth too.
>
> China can't do dick.
Clearly someone didn’t read the article. What does Finland or Colombia have to do with any of this? They both possess brown water navies incapable of helping the US and even then have no skin in the game. Ditto korea. Besides, article is talking about waning power projection in the near future, not current. China has nukes too btw. As the term implies, mutually assured destruction goes both ways.