HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: breitbart ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:24AM

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/14/australia-says-no-special-treatment-for-assange-as-father-pleads-for-release/

Assange summarised: "the Internet, our greatest tool for emancipation, has been transformed into the most dangerous facilitator of totalitarianism we have ever seen".

--------------------


Julian is a programmer who runs a server hosting "Wikileaks", which allows uploads of (pertinent/leaked) information Without Moderation - which is easily argued to be "free speech" and whistle blowing (a completely legal activity).



Julian would not have known the significance of a renegade upload until after a complaint was filed unless he read all uploads before posting. Many websites, including Youtube, do not moderate uploads until there is a complaint upon them.

Julian could not have known the clearance and Julian followed industry standard practice (ie, that Google uses).


.

Re: Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: breitbart ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:24AM

220px-RUEDA_DE_PRENSA_CONJUNTA_ENTRE_CAN

Re: Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: CORRECTION ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:27AM

Julian would not have known the significance of a renegade upload until after a complaint was filed unless he read all uploads before posting

CORRECTION:

without 2,000,000 security clearances (1 from each nation and sub agencies), Julian cannot have Moderated because he would not know what material was and was not marked as "secure".

Re: Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: breitbart ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:34AM

Julian-Assange-wink-thumbs-up-getty-420x

Re: Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: mnpbj ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:39AM

my opinion is anyone after Julian must be:

(a) helping publicize his website

(b) helping Hillary and corrupt politicians assert facist power

I think (a) is unlikely as so many people have unsettled legal complaints and fake news is prevailing: no one has time for whistle blowing because alarms are too loud to hear it - and as well people are un-afraid to leak into another country's news media (ie, usa's). wikileaks has allot of un-interesting material it is not a "host of most important leaks ever heard". leaks are not organized by impact.

Re: Australia Says ‘No Special Treatment’ for Assange as Father Pleads for Release
Posted by: uxc4m ()
Date: April 14, 2019 10:41AM

Hillary and friends (esp Germany) wish to assert the "right of government" to seize land and liberty (jail) ...


merely on the notion that "Government Does Not Approve This Person", without any legitimate Court handling or argument to support especially Not evidence


This forum powered by Phorum.