7. linear solutions

8. grunge approximation to solutions

9. trolling for solutions

Should I embrace this course or call it racist and protest it's existence ?

welcome to FF University, where trolling and anti trolling is what matters

"You can't troll that!"

so changing history is certainly trolling.

is delving into details that are un-necessary delay from graduating ... is that also trolling - trolling for obstructing students and causing higher tuition ?

syllabus ride Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 7. linear solutions
>
> 8. grunge approximation to solution

Runge

> 9. trolling for solutions
>
> Should I embrace this course or call it racist and
> protest it's existence ?

> Runge

smart ass trolls are not smarter

few knew

real math question: how many 'continuum mathematics' beam analysis loops were done on this before it crashed onto a live highway. did they use Runge?

beamer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> src=https://news.fiu.edu/wp-content/uploads/IMG_43
> 87-768x576.jpg>
>
> real math question: how many 'continuum
> mathematics' beam analysis loops were done on this
> before it crashed onto a live highway. did they
> use Runge?

Not likely. That would be FEM/FEA. Possibly RungeKutta.

The problem with that structure is that it had no redundancy. One failure in any element and it was all going to come down. The people building it also had no idea what they were doing. It's almost certain they exceeded the compressive strength of one of the beams while attempting to close cracks.

hjey3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> beamer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=https://news.fiu.edu/wp-content/uploads/IMG_43
>
> > 87-768x576.jpg>
> >
> > real math question: how many 'continuum
> > mathematics' beam analysis loops were done on
> this
> > before it crashed onto a live highway. did
> they
> > use Runge?
>
> Not likely. That would be FEM/FEA. Possibly
> RungeKutta.
>
> The problem with that structure is that it had no
> redundancy. One failure in any element and it was
> all going to come down. The people building it
> also had no idea what they were doing. It's
> almost certain they exceeded the compressive
> strength of one of the beams while attempting to
> close cracks.

which troll is this? not g2 i hope.

i think it's continuum math if you know the rates already, FEM if you don't and need to find them

hjey3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> beamer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
> src=https://news.fiu.edu/wp-content/uploads/IMG_43
>
> > 87-768x576.jpg>
> >
> > real math question: how many 'continuum
> > mathematics' beam analysis loops were done on
> this
> > before it crashed onto a live highway. did
> they
> > use Runge?
>
> Not likely. That would be FEM/FEA. Possibly
> RungeKutta.
>
> The problem with that structure is that it had no
> redundancy. One failure in any element and it was
> all going to come down. The people building it
> also had no idea what they were doing. It's
> almost certain they exceeded the compressive
> strength of one of the beams while attempting to
> close cracks.

i think there is significant evidence to say it was an "low cost empty shell that was not what was on the plans submitted" - that the money not spent into the structure was THEFT - and that they KNEW it would fall. the "hard rock hotel" might be another such incident - as a lowely illegal alien worker sensed it and took his own video - saying this was more or less his opinion of the state of affairs

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/2980384.html

syllabus ride Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think it's continuum math if you know the rates
> already, FEM if you don't and need to find them

yes - who fem'ed this article and was it luck or skill ?