Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
D'OHnald
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:14PM
Then he is going to build a wall and force Mexico to pay for it using his coal fired Navy to blockade Mexico until they cough up the money.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
Fan of Trump
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:15PM
Trump is smart to use coal instead of Nuclear. It's cheaper and the US has way more. Trump is really really really smart.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
BelowMe.
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:18PM
Trump's Great Wall should be built with coal. If anyone tries to cross, they just light it on fire.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
Do'hnny
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:22PM
I heard not only is the Don gonna biuld the wall with Chinese materials, but he's also gonna contract a bunch of chinamen to build it because he said they know how to build walls, and the last wall they built was so good NO Mexicans were able to get in.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
dopd
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:40PM
No need for wall now...we need mexicans to shovel coal to power our ships.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
D'OHnald
()
Date: March 28, 2017 05:46PM
dopd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No need for wall now...we need mexicans to shovel
> coal to power our ships.
But who is Trump going to import to mow the grass, serve food, and clean rooms at Trump's coal fired golf resorts?
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
grophusharris
()
Date: March 29, 2017 12:29AM
He will have a hard time with that one when you consider that from 1916 until the nuclear era, most US warships burned oil (the submarines used diesel). In fact, USS TEXAS and USS OLYMPIA may be the only US NAVY ships afloat that ever burned coal (and TEXAS may have been converted to oil, at some point--I forget, now).
So if The Donald plans on a coal burning navy, it will have only two ships, for now, one a Spanish-American War era armoured cruiser and the other a First World War battleship--both of which are hopelessly obsolete.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
No Nukes
()
Date: March 29, 2017 12:55AM
I agree with Trump. Nuclear power is not natural. We have enough coal to crush our enemies and rule this planet for 1000 years.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
Bring back warships with sails
()
Date: March 29, 2017 01:15AM
It's simple and greener. And a sailing ship is completely independent of any port - it never needs refueling. Also, making all the ropes would stimulate the hemp industry.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
D'OHnald
()
Date: March 29, 2017 07:05AM
Ten times more people work in the alternative energy industry than in the coal industry.
Trump chooses not to know this. Malicious ignorance is a bad choice.
Attachments:
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
D'OHnald Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ten times more people work in the alternative
> energy industry than in the coal industry.
>
> Trump chooses not to know this. Malicious
> ignorance is a bad choice.
So you're saying that 10% of the entire energy industry don't deserve a job or food or shelter?
Interesting take on a fucked up premise.
Re: Trump to Scrap Nuclear Navy and Bring Back Coal Fired Ships that Run on Steam
Posted by:
Jcjgx
()
Date: March 29, 2017 08:30AM
Vexxxed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> D'OHnald Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ten times more people work in the alternative
> > energy industry than in the coal industry.
> >
> > Trump chooses not to know this. Malicious
> > ignorance is a bad choice.
>
>
> So you're saying that 10% of the entire energy
> industry don't deserve a job or food or shelter?
>
> Interesting take on a fucked up premise.