I may even have to tune into Al Sharpton's show tonight and double his ratings. Bobblehead will be going off. lol
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Shocked
()
Date: December 03, 2014 03:19PM
THIS is the case that should have become the textbook case of police abuse - not Ferguson. Personally, I don't think this stop and the subsequent death were racially motivated, but I can see how other people would.
The cops escalated this incident, not Garner. His obesity and associated health conditions probably played a role in his death, but that's immaterial. This guy was not a threat. Ironically, he actually looked like a gentle giant.
Such a shame that the black community chose Ferguson, not this incident, to represent the valid complaint of police abuse. It will be interesting to see the reaction to the non-indictment.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Dr. Dong
()
Date: December 03, 2014 03:27PM
This smells fishy, way more so than Fergie. That NY pig should have been indicted. This is the case that deserves a riot.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Not Welcome
()
Date: December 03, 2014 04:26PM
Dr. Dong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is the case
> that deserves a riot.
You are inciting a riot. Stop it.
I saw the video of this arrest. If these nogs would just not resist, everybody would go home alive. If you've ever watched the show "Cops", 90% of the nogs they arrest put up a fight and usually for stupid charges.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Wrong!
()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:28PM
^ He did not actively resist. He put his hands up and said 'don't touch me'. The cops did not have to escalate this, especially over such a trivial offense.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Alexander Smith
()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:40PM
This is a case where police brutality came into play on a black who actually did not resist arrest. What a disgrace the cops have become.
It really makes me angry to see these public servants act like the military towwards ordiary citizens, seeing them as enemy combatants.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
NYC gonna burn
()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:47PM
It's going up tonight.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Libtard slayer
()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:55PM
Not Welcome Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Dong Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is the case
> > that deserves a riot.
>
> You are inciting a riot. Stop it.
LULZ
Quit being a gov't bootlicker for once and realize the fuckin pigs can basically do what they want now in this country and get away with it.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Al Sharpton
()
Date: December 03, 2014 06:00PM
Oh hell yeah!
I'm gonna make more off of this shit than I did Big Mike, Trayvon, and Tawana all put together!
Wrong! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^ He did not actively resist. He put his hands up
> and said 'don't touch me'. The cops did not have
> to escalate this, especially over such a trivial
> offense.
Not true. Watch the video with your eyes open this time.
First of all, he would not put his hands behind his back. The officer in front of him grabbed his arms and Garner pulled them up to try to break free. I definitely don't agree with what the cops did, but he certainly was not complying with the arrest. If he had calmly put his hands behind his back and let the cops cuff him up he would have gone home that day and would probably weigh 500 lbs by now.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
truth tellerz
()
Date: December 03, 2014 09:18PM
Should have been an indictment on this one.
BUT - no one is bringing up that NYC's exorbitant taxes on cigarettes create a black market for them, which of course everyone predicted. Another liberal victory!!
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Jhonnythong
()
Date: December 03, 2014 09:40PM
truth tellerz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Should have been an indictment on this one.
>
> BUT - no one is bringing up that NYC's exorbitant
> taxes on cigarettes create a black market for
> them, which of course everyone predicted. Another
> liberal victory!!
Hey that's racist!
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Cops = Gestapo
()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:10AM
.
Attachments:
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
fuck the police
()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:32AM
.
Attachments:
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Officer Friendly
()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:46PM
Yeah all my brothers in blue are gonna celebrate by beating the shit out of ANY OF YOU AND ALL OF YOU!
Can't wait for the riots to start in the city so we can beat the shit out of all the white guilters and niggers.
It's going to be wonderful!!
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
iLester
()
Date: December 04, 2014 01:13PM
He did resist arrest. The police officers did nothing to help him after he was just lying there.
NYC cops have been over the top since their beginning. They have a long history of being crooked and covering up shit. You notice that the feds are looking into charges in this one, but not Ferguson. The cop used an illegal chokehold, which is illegal for a reason. Though, I don't believe the pig should be guilty of murder, involuntary manslaughter would sound right. Its what a civilian would have been charged with. At the least. Too many pigs think they are above the law. And their superiors enable those actions by coverups. Just like the pigs covered up the lorton murder by that cop.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
DontCare
()
Date: December 05, 2014 10:56AM
Selling "loosies" and not paying taxes: CRIMINAL
Grazing cattle on public land and not paying taxes: NATIONAL HERO
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
Dontcare = dumbfuq
()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:11AM
Thinks that two events are somehow comparable, proves to be butthurt.
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by:
DontCare
()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:26AM
Dontcare = dumbfuq Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thinks that two events are somehow comparable,
> proves to be butthurt.
blahblah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You notice that the
> feds are looking into charges in this one, but not
> Ferguson.
Actually I think Eric Holder (the house nigger) IS looking into a civil rights case in Ferguson. I mean, why the fuck did he go down there if he isn't? Just to get some collard greens and some fried chicken?
The question to ask is, how would you have acted if you were that police officer? I think a police officer in New York City has a bit more stress and pressure than the keyboard warriors talking about how horrible this was.