Re: springfield town center
Date: April 24, 2013 09:57PM
jack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tysons Engineer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > jack Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > While the Mixing Bowl did make it easier to
> go
> > > further away from a city center due to less
> > > traffic it should eventually also make
> > Springfield
> > > a hub for local companies. I can see why
> > people
> > > would be worried about the transient nature
> but
> > > isnt DC itself pretty transient with new
> > elected
> > > officials and new contractors basically in
> and
> > out
> > > every year.
> >
> >
> > Except that theory has never been proven.
> > Corporations that select offices seem to find
> > highway infrastructure just as unsightly as
> > residential owners. No one wants to be over
> > shaddowed by a 10 story highway. They want a
> prime
> > location, in the center of town, around other
> > things, food amenities for employees, etc.
> >
> > The same thing was said about the SESW freeway
> > when it was built, that companies would flock
> to
> > it because it provided quick access for
> employees,
> > but the opposite became true. Every last
> company
> > moved away because the area turned into a slum.
> >
> > Highways and commercial business districts
> simply
> > do not mix. You kill the very commercial
> dynamics
> > you were trying to help. Best solution is to
> build
> > highways up to the general zone, then step down
> > via multiple different smaller city scale roads
> > that can disperse the traffic.
>
>
> I notice your username is Tysons Engineer. Any
> thoughts on what the metro infrastructure (above
> road highways) will do to that area.
Considering Tysons is one of the few areas in NOVA which have actually reduced the vacancy rate in Office space, I think the metro is proving to be beneficial to the economy of Tysons (even if it is above ground).
I know a lot of people are against it (as I was), but with Tysons it is a matter of scale. Right now the metro seems big, but when 25 story buildings start going up along side of it, the impact will be reduced.
That being said there are clear winners and losers forming in Tysons subregions.
Route 123 on the McLean side is seeing far more development and growth in Office, North Tysons along westpark is seeing a lot of growth for residential. However Route 7 has seen almost no growth of office, and only limited residential at Spring Hill Station.
That trend will likely continue as Northeast Tysons becomes far more urban, as western Tysons struggles to reform from strip malls and car dealerships.
There are a lot of examples of above ground rail that are very successful. We'll see if Silver Line becomes one. Personally I think it will initially function fine, and if successful, it would only take a few million dollars (less than 1 percent of the project) to provide some aesthetic improvements, facade work on pier sections, landscaping, etc.
We'll see
You ever been to a new subdivision? Stuff looks weird when it is first built. When trees, and lights, and buildings start going in the metro will look alot more natural.