"Riders" don't make their motorcycles loud to increase awareness. They do it for the same reason ricers rig up their Civics to be loud, or the same reason people buy Mustangs -- they have an inner need to feel "manly" and get attention. The more people who are looking at them, the cooler and more validated they feel. These are people who on some level were ignored by their parents during childhood, hence their need for attention as adults.

Sure, the noise is annoying. But the best thing you can do is ignore them -- it drives them crazy. And be thankful that your parents weren't so mean to you and that you don't have these kinds of "Look at me!!!" issues as an adult. You're much better off.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Riders" don't make their motorcycles loud to
> increase awareness. They do it for the same
> reason ricers rig up their Civics to be loud, or
> the same reason people buy Mustangs -- they have
> an inner need to feel "manly" and get attention.
> The more people who are looking at them, the
> cooler and more validated they feel. These are
> people who on some level were ignored by their
> parents during childhood, hence their need for
> attention as adults.

That's what I've often suspected, but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt. I tend to think they just like that their machine sounds powerful. Nothing wrong with that...except you're taking it out in public and annoying a bunch of other people.

When I can't have a conversation IN my car because your bike OUTSIDE my car is too loud...it's too loud.

Either side of the argument implies that one person's entitlement trumps the others.

I say that the issue is very much about safety when I'm riding in the HOV lane (of which 90% of the miles on my motorcycle are from) and the distracted drivers that I see every day pulling boneheaded moves that endanger drivers around them.

If it makes you feel better to think of it as a childhood problem, that's okay by me. All that I care about is that you know I am there. And if that causes you a few second of agitation, so be it. Because you are just one in a hundred of people I will find myself near and at a distinct disadvantage against. And it's the one person who isnt paying attention that otherwise might pull into me that I am concerned about.

Before I got louder pipes on my bike I could point to any number of near misses. After getting the pipes redone, I've had none. Zero. Not a single person has mistakenly pulled into me in traffic. It may not be scientific enough for some of you, but for me it works.

How about just taking a few moments to chill the fuck out.

Kardinal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Motorcycles are dangerous and obnoxious. They
> make much more noise than cars, obnoxiously and
> earsplittingly more. And they're dangerous to the
> cycler and other drivers. PLUS motorcyclists are
> idiots who weave in and out of traffic and jockey
> for position dangerously in traffic, putting
> everyone at risk.
>
> Only police should have motorcycles. Ban the
> rest.

This.

Harley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How about just taking a few moments to chill the
> fuck out.

LOL. The one who's intentionally being obnoxious tells the rest of us to chill the fuck out. I love it. :-)

Sorry but I've already dismantled the "safety" argument earlier in this thread. (So well in fact that Dane Bramage hasn't been seen since.) No "rider" can logically claim to be concerned about his or her own safety -- it's a contradiction. I don't see why you "riders" can't just be honest. You like the noise because it makes you feel manly and gets you attention. Why be ashamed of it?

I'm not the one complaining here; the "problem" here is entirely on your side.

Heh, you must just want to get the last word in. It's the only conceivable explanation as to why you'd even bother to post such a pointless response that has absolutely nothing to do with the posts it was in response to.

Would you like me to give you the last word? Is that all you want? :-)

Kilton=Kardinal=Troll?

Boy oh boy. It's amazing how many first-time posters are showing up in this thread. What's the matter guys? Don't want to ruin the "reputation" of your primary FFU account? LOL.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sorry but I've already dismantled the "safety"
> argument earlier in this thread.


lol, just because you declared yourself the winner doesn't make it true.

You dismantled nothing.

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

You accidentally forgot to quote the subsequent sentence where I mentioned your name. Tsk tsk. :-)

Your disappearance did all the declaring that was necessary.

Sure, I'll take the last word.

Harley wrote :
> "Either side of the argument implies that one person's entitlement trumps the others."

WRONG!

One side (car drivers) is obeying current law by
yeilding their brights for oncomming traffic, and
the other side (asshole two-wheeler drivers) is
ignorantly and dangerously saying "I do this, because
of other people who can't drive"

HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

The real answer here is that there's a bit of truth in both versions of this argument. There are some with little dick syndrome that like to get straight pipes and can't help themselves from blipping the throttle every chance they get to make some noise. There are some that are not idiot riders who ride within the law and want to make sure cagers around them know they are there because most of the time, cagers don't pay 100% attention.

I have ridden off and on for 20+ years, including 5+ in the DC metro area. In those 5 yrs I've had countless incidents of people changing lanes/merging into me because they made a quick glance out of their peripheral vision, didn't see another large vehicle and start merging. I've had countless people not pay attention to how close they are behind me and almost run into me when I'm stopping at red lights. I've had people change 3 lanes to make an exit at the last minute and almost run me off the road. I've had people pull out to pass someone and almost ram me head on because they did a cursory glance and didn't actually LOOK before moving. I've had people pull out in front of me whether I was going 25 mph or 65 mph because they didn't actually look. ETC ETC ETC

The problem is that most people driving a car/truck glance almost habitually with the expectation of seeing something as large as what they are driving and if that something isn't there in that cursory glance, they make their move. They aren't actually looking as much as they're going through the motions.

Riding with high beams helps greatly with people pulling out in front of you or pulling out to pass someone else while in your lane. It also helps greatly in decreasing the chances of someone cutting you off by changing lanes into your path. Louder pipes do actually help by making it obvious that you are next to someone in traffic and makes them more aware of your existance.

As far as lane splitting is concerned, in many countries it is legal to lane split and it's a cultural norm that people on scooters / motorcycles will weave through traffic to the front and take off as soon as the light turns and be ahead of the rest of the car traffic.

This is actually safer for the scooters/motorcycles as it gets them away from the cars while moving and actually reduces traffic congestion by getting those vehicles out of the way quicker.

The only reason it's so dangerous here is because people don't pay attention, their initial gut reaction is that the motorcycle rider is trying to "get ahead" and people get down right viciously bitter at the idea of someone motorcycle rider getting ahead of them.... to the point of seeing people purposely try to ram/squeeze motorcycle riders who were splitting lanes.

Just like there are some cagers that do pay attention, there are some motorcycle riders who are safe riders and vice versa.

People who argue absolute stereotypes will always be wrong.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Harley wrote :
> > "Either side of the argument implies that one
> person's entitlement trumps the others."
>
> WRONG!
>
> One side (car drivers) is obeying current law by
> yeilding their brights for oncomming traffic, and
>
> the other side (asshole two-wheeler drivers) is
> ignorantly and dangerously saying "I do this,
> because
> of other people who can't drive"
>
> HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?
> .

Having already shown that DMV promotes the use of high beams - http://www.dmv.state.va.us/webdoc/citizen/drivers/mcmanual/mcmanual6.asp - you have yet to show that use of this recommended approach is "dangerous" (i know, i know, those "stray beams of light" you are so concerned about).

Good post, Rob. Suggesting everyone does something for a single reason is pointless; my motivation is based entirely on experiences riding 4,000+ miles a year in I-66 HOV lanes (which are similar to yours).

One could easily have the same differences of opinions regarding large SUVs. I own a V10 Ford Excusion, lifted with 33" tires, a push bar and a Freightliner air horn.

Fucking socialists.

Harley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Having already shown that DMV promotes the use of
> high beams

We've already been over this. You're like a broken record my man. Nowhere does the DMV promote breaking the law, and law-abiding high beam use is not what started this thread.

i have an 2009 orange r6. next time you see me tell me you have a problem

Hyabusa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Kilton=Kardinal=Troll?

Nope. I'm very certain I've never posted under anything other than this account. I don't hide behind anonymous accounts or alternate accounts. I'm always Kardinal.

That said, I am trolling a bit with the "BAN MOTORCYCLES". I admit I don't see the appeal and think they're dangerous, but I don't want them banned. Just for the rules to be tightened and the riders to be more respectful.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/05/2010 04:38PM by Kardinal.

GAY anon-user 'FACE PUNCHER' wrote :

>"i have an 2009 orange r6. next time you
> see me tell me you have a problem"

Excellent! I have a size 12 boot.
So next time you see me, be sure to say hi
if you'd like me to put it far, FAR up your ass.

By the way orange is GAY!
And 600 cc motors are for BITCHES!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

GAY anon-user named 'Harley' wrote :

> "Having already shown that DMV promotes the use of high beams - [www.dmv.state.va.us]"

Yes the RETARDED Department of Motor Vehicles suggests
you may attract attention to your dangerous vehicles by doing
this in the DAYTIME. NOT @ NIGHT because you are too lazy and
high on your cyclist's pedestal to dim your highbeams for
oncoming traffic.

> "- you have yet to show that use of this recommended approach is "dangerous"

MUST I SPELL OUT THE FACT THAT IF YOU ARE COMING
AROUND A BEND ON A DARK TWO WAY ROAD AND SOME ASSHOLE
LIKE YOURSELF WILLINGLY BLINDS THE PERSON, IT CAN HAVE DEADLY
RESULTS FOR YOU OR THE PERSON YOU HAVE BLINDED.

NOW, go fuck yourself with a broken broomstick.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/05/2010 04:57PM by Troll@AOL.

I would not and do not condone driving at night with high beams on; I've focused on the daytime use portion only (and the use of louder than stock pipes).

Having not posted under another ID, I see no reason/benefit to registering.

Chuck Hoffman, is that you?

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Sigh...We're back to the broomstick again...and this time Troll wants a broken one...

Harley, whoever you are, I suggest you give up...this forum is not about reasoned discourse. I ride myself, use highbeams in the daytime (only in the daytime), and in over 20 years of riding, I've never had a person so much as flash their lights at me. I had no idea that this was such an incendary issue, but it is amusing to picture Troll frothing at the mouth (and other body parts) as he rants about light searing his eyeballs.

Just quit before Troll calls you a fagapuss, etc, etc, etc...

Oddly, Troll seems to know something about bikes, such as an R6 being a 600cc bike...I still suspect he is actually an avid rider and is writing all this to make people more aware of motorcycles, to ensure the safety of the riders...

I love the "only during the daytime" stuff. Good to see you "riders" draw the line somewhere by only breaking the law during the daytime. We're all very proud of you. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> We've already been over this. You're like a
> broken record my man. Nowhere does the DMV
> promote breaking the law, and law-abiding high
> beam use is not what started this thread.

It must obviously not be against the law for MCs to use high beams during the day to increase visibility, regardless of the code section you quoted.

In case you're taking the written test, study hard and answer correctly:

Page 10 of the Virginia Motorcycle Operator Manual, on the DMV website

Headlight
The best way to help others on the road see your motorcycle
is to keep the headlight on — at all times. Studies show that,
during the day, a motorcycle with lights off is twice as likely to
go unnoticed by other road users. Also, use of the high beam
in daylight increases the likelihood that you will be seen by
oncoming drivers.

http://www.dmv.state.va.us/webdoc/pdf/dmv2.pdf

Cheers!

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It must obviously not be against the law for MCs
> to use high beams during the day to increase
> visibility, regardless of the code section you
> quoted.

Haha. Allow me to translate this into English:

"Regardless of the portion of the VA law you quoted which specifically and clearly states that 'a vehicle' shall use the low beam of his headlights within 500 feet of another 'vehicle', motorcycles are 'obviously' allowed to use their high beams in this situation. Even though a motorcycle is a vehicle. Even though there is no exemption in the VA law for motorcycles. My name is Dane Bramage, and I'm a really smart rider!"

You're some genius. No wonder you vanished from this thread until I taunted you into returning. :-)

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> You're some genius. No wonder you vanished from
> this thread until I taunted you into returning.
> :-)

The DMV manual says use high beams, LEO uses them, I use them, we all use them.

The Motorcycle Safety Foundation advocates their use, based on accident statistics

Nothing you write or say will change this.

Simply put, it is in far more places than the so called law you cite (which pertains to night driving)

Of course, I'll now let you have the last word again, with your broomstick brethren.

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

"The DMV manual says use high beams"

NOT @ night, BROOMSTICK-ASSHOLE.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Simply put, it is in far more places than the so
> called law you cite (which pertains to night
> driving)


See, this is why you can't win a debate and therefore have to keep leaving the thread -- you just make stuff up. I don't know if those little fingers of yours just type and type and type without your brain doing any fact-checking or what, but it's fascinating to watch. :-)

The law in question says nothing about night driving vs. day driving. Therefore it applies to both. Nice try though!

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The law in question says nothing about night
> driving vs. day driving. Therefore it applies to
> both. Nice try though!

Since when is "the law" the determining factor as to weather its appropriate or not?

Others on your side of the debate suggest the response is to break even more laws to make a point to someone utilizing guidelines to promote safety in a place where law breakers are the norm on the roads.

If we're the only ones playing to the letter of the law, we're the ones who end up getting killed because of other people's negligence.

The law is not about being right or wrong.

Although these may not apply to you, sex outside marriage and blowjobs are against the law in Virginia......

18.2-344. Fornication.

Any person, not being married, who voluntarily shall have sexual intercourse with any other person, shall be guilty of fornication, punishable as a Class 4 misdemeanor.

§ 18.2-361 Crimes against nature

A. If any person carnally knows in any manner any brute animal, or carnally knows any male or female person by the anus or by or with the mouth, or voluntarily submits to such carnal knowledge, he or she shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony, except as provided in subsection B.

SO, are you WILLINGLY and IGNORANTLY endangering other peoples lives by breaking that law?

NO. So your point is MOOT.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Boy, getting desperate now. :-) You think that a 200-year old law that no one cares enough about to waste time repealing is comparable to the high beam law? It's amazing how good the human mind is at justifying its own behavior to itself.

Harley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If we're the only ones playing to the letter of the law,
> we're the ones who end up getting killed because of other
> people's negligence.

Nope, you end up getting killed because you made a conscious decision to put yourself in danger by "riding". No one's fault but your own. You knew the risks and did it anyway because you think "riding" is cool and manly.

'Harley' Douche Noozle wrote :

> "Since when is "the law" the determining factor as
> to weather its appropriate or not?"

ARE YOU MEXICAN?

Not only is the LAW (fuck the REATRDED DMV) telling you
that you are wrong, you refuse to acknowledge the LAW, and
dim your fucking headlights for oncoming traffic.
PLUS the dimming attracts more attention to you, then a
constant light being on.

> "Others on your side of the debate suggest the response is
> to break even more laws to make a point to someone utilizing
> guidelines

***(or better yet-your own interpretation of those guidelines)

NO ONE SUGGESTED BREAKING THE LAW BECAUSE OF ASSHOLES LIKE YOU.
AND IF BREAKING THE LAW IS OKAY FOR YOU THEN IT IS OKAY TO BRIGHT
YOUR PUNKASSES BACK-SWERVE AT YOU-OR WHAT EVER WE MIGHT THINK OF
TO COMBAT ASSHOLE DRIVERS LIKE YOURSELF THAT SEEM TO THINK EVERYONE
ELSE IS THE PROBLEM, WHO CHOOSES NOT TO CLIMB ON THE BACK OF A TWO
WHEELED DEATH TRAP.

> "to promote safety in a place where law breakers are the
> norm on the roads."

Just because you percieve ALL other drivers as lawbreakers
does NOT give you the right to break the law IN ADVANCE yourself,
to supposedly combat others lack of driving safety.


> "If we're the only ones playing to the letter of the law,
> we're the ones who end up getting killed because of other
> people's negligence."

REALLY? IT IS YOUR FAULT EVERY TIME FOR CHOOSING TO DRIVE A
DANGEROUS VEHICLE.

DON'T MAKE THE ROADS LESS SAFE FOR OTHERS JUST BECAUSE YOUR
A BICYCLE RIDING FAGGOT.

Plus, if it is negligence that a driver happens to not see you,
then it is MURDER if YOU cause a crash because you refuse to cater to
common sense and dim your sorryass headlights.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Kilton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Boy, getting desperate now. :-) You think that a
> 200-year old law that no one cares enough about to
> waste time repealing is comparable to the high
> beam law? It's amazing how good the human mind is
> at justifying its own behavior to itself.
>

I'll take that as an admission of fault in your argument.

The only fault is with the straw man argument that you've created out of thin air. But if that's how you want to roll, I'm cool with it. :-)

The reason the law has been a focal point of this thread is because a handful of rocket scientists (lead by Dane Bramage) have maintained that they're not breaking the law and are therefore in the right. They've weaseled around the very-clear text of the law in various ways, from claiming that a suggestion in the DMV "riding" manual trumps the VA law all the way to claiming the law somehow only applies at night.

You're at least coming from a somewhat more solid position. You acknowledge what the law says and admit that you're willingly breaking it. We just disagree on the logic of it. You say it's for safety. I say that no one who willingly puts oneself in danger ("riding") when it's not necessary (drive a car instead) cares about their own safety; therefore, willingly annoying other drivers with your dopey high beams in the name of safety is a bizarre contradiction rooted in deeper issues. And so it goes. :-)

"NO ONE SUGGESTED BREAKING THE LAW BECAUSE OF ASSHOLES LIKE YOU.
AND IF BREAKING THE LAW IS OKAY FOR YOU THEN IT IS OKAY TO BRIGHT
YOUR PUNKASSES BACK-SWERVE AT YOU-OR WHAT EVER WE MIGHT THINK OF
TO COMBAT ASSHOLE DRIVERS LIKE YOURSELF THAT SEEM TO THINK EVERYONE
ELSE IS THE PROBLEM, WHO CHOOSES NOT TO CLIMB ON THE BACK OF A TWO
WHEELED DEATH TRAP."

After wending my way through your last garbled word salad, I see that, yet again, Troll, you're suggesting and hinting at purposely swerving into the path of a motorcycle. Your anger now seems to be confabulating bicycles and motorcycles--as evidenced by your "bicycle riding faggot" line, so I assume both types of vehicles are at risk when you're on the road.

You're not funny any more. Go ahead, make yet another all-caps "broomstick-asshole" response. The fact is, you're a sick, angry fuck, and it increasingly seems you're actually capable of winding yourself up to hurt someone on the road.

Isn't it really about degrees of danger and the forethought to minimize that risk by employing methods that are shown to improve safety?

Yes, I ride knowing its more dangerous than being in a car, but driving my monster Excursion is safer than that (although clearly this would put any driver of a car at a distinct disadvantage). But I get 9mpg in the Excursion and would be driving in rush hour traffic in an over-sized vehicle that fits my 5 children better as opposed to riding in the HOV and getting 40+ mpg. On days the weather isn't favorable, I'll drive my Acura.

As it is, riding my motorcycle with the louder pipes alone has made my commute much more safer. I dont know that the lights are a factor either way and only just recently started using them, however, I try to be aware of when they might be considered obnoxious to the driver in front of me (my Harley has dual front headlights) and I turn them down if I am driving in close traffic at low speeds or if its nearing sunset.

However, another defensive tactic is to ride closer to the car in front of me - leaving even a couple car lengths between us is the space where someone who isnt thinking just assumes there is nobody there and will turn into me (without a turn signal or any other indication of a lane change). Again, probably against the law as I would be considered "following too closely" and the person in front of me is probably taking notice, but I'm trying to find a balance between being seen and being safe.

I don't care for lane splitting or weaving, I'm not in a race or on a track. I'm just trying to get from point A to point B safely.

Do I drive 55mph on the highway? Not always. If traffic is light and I have a lane nearly to myself, I might do 64mph (or more?). Legal? Safer? Nope. But we all do it. Again, degrees of danger here. It's not just getting on a bike around here that is dangerous - it's just getting into traffic. I've seen 4 or more cars piled up because someone lane jumped to get into the Nutley exit and didn't want to wait a minute or two longer by merging properly and did so in a way as to cause everyone to slam on breaks and rear end each other.

I'm not intentionally trying to be a dick with my pipes or my high beams; I'm just trying to avoid being hit by a car driven by someone not paying proper attention while at the same time taking advantage of HOV and much lower fuel costs.

Sure, minimizing risk makes sense. But you're doing it by annoying other drivers, and you're the one choosing to put yourself at risk in the first place, so you can't be surprised by our reaction. As the great George Costanza once said, we're trying to have a society here.

In any event, your first few posts in this thread notwithstanding, you appear to be far more reasonable than the other riders who have stopped by so far. On behalf of the rest of us I thank you for at least trying to be conscious of when your lights are annoying. I hope you'll also start considering drivers who are coming at you in the opposite direction.

Generally speaking, 95% of my riding is in the daytime in HOV lanes. Drivers in the other direction are not a factor. In as much as I can ride on the weekends, I would say that I do not ride with my high beams on at all as I avoid routes with heavy traffic preferring open road rides to the west. My intent is not to annoy, just to try and be seen. Same with the exhaust - even I thought it was a bit much when I first got it having researched and ask numerous times if this was not "loud" (but learning later loud is subjective and asking a custom shop skews the answer). But I can't knock the results and got used to it.

I wouldn't mind checking out the pulse light bulbs, curious if they are a compromise between riding with high beams or just a novelty item.

Problem with this site is most of it is just shit talking; I dont mind taking a shit-talking position on the subject; but most seem uninterested in a meaningful discussion that leaves room for compromise.

SAME asshole anon-user using name 'Lee Marvin' this time wrote:

> "After wending

WHAT'S A "WENDING"?

> "my way through your last garbled word salad,

YEAH YOU SHOULD TALK!

> "I see that, yet again, Troll, you're suggesting and
> hinting at purposely swerving into the path of a motorcycle."

NOT HINTING, IF YOU ARE SAYING YOU ARE GOING TO PURPOSELY BLIND
ME I WILL PROMISE YOU I WILL SWERVE AND YOU MIGHT THINK I AM SWERVING
AT YOU, BUT I WILL NEVER LEAVE MY LANE WHILE FLASHING MY BRIGHTS
BACK AT YOU OF COURSE.

YOU KNOW WHY?

BECAUSE I EQUALLY WANT TO GET YOUR ATTENTION ABOUT MY PRESENCE.

> "Your anger now seems to be confabulating

SORRY THESUARUS USE IS NOT ALLOWED ON Fairfax Underground!
ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU CAN'T EVEN USE IT PROPERLY IN CONTEXT!

CHECK IT OUT ASSHOLE :
http://i.word.com/idictionary/confabulating <-- CLICK HERE

CONFABULATE/
1 : to talk informally : chat
2 : to hold a discussion : confer
3 : to fill in gaps in memory by fabrication

> "bicycles and motorcycles--as evidenced by your
> 'bicycle riding faggot' line,"

WAS *MISCOMBOBULATED* THE WORD YOU WERE LOOKING FOR?
AS IN CONFUSED OR MIXED UP?
ALTHOUGH YOU ARE AWARE A MOTORCYCLE IS
A MOTORIZED BICYCLE RIGHT?
OR ARE YOU THAT STUPID?


> "so I assume both types of vehicles are at risk when
> you're on the road."

NO. BUT BOTH TYPES OF VEHICLES INCLUDING EVERY OTHER
VEHICLE AND THEIR PASSENGERS, ARE AT RISK WHEN RETARDED 'RIDERS'
LIKE YOU ARE DRIVING ON THE ROADS BLINDING PEOPLE.

> "You're not funny any more."

SORRY WASN'T EVER TRYING TO BE FUNNY. ALTHOUGH YOUR ATTITUDE ON
BLINDING OTHER DRIVERS IS LAUGHABLE, BEING THAT YOU HOPEFULLY WILL
BLIND SOMEONE WHILE BREAKING THE SPEED LIMIT AND BECOME A SPOT ON
THE SIDE OF THEIR PASSENGER DOOR.

Go ahead, make yet another all-caps "broomstick-asshole" response.

THAT'S OKAY, I THINK YOU KNOW HOW FAR UP YOUR ASS TO STICK THAT
BROKEN BROOMSTICK.

> "The fact is, you're a sick,"

I'M SICK OR IS YOUR MOTHER FOR HAVING YOU?

>angry fuck,

YOU ARE THE ONE GETTING ALL ANGRY. NOT me.

> "and it increasingly seems you're actually capable of
> winding yourself up to hurt someone on the road."

REALLY? KINDA LIKE AN ASSHOLE THAT WILLFULLY BLINDS EVERY
OTHER DRIVER SHARING THE ROADWAY AND ACTS LIKE IT IS NOT DANGEROUS?
NICE.

BE ON THE LOOK OUT FOR DEFENSIVE DRIVERS LIKE MYSELF WHO
DON'T CARE IF YOU ARE BLINDING ME AS YOU SPEED DOWN ON AN INTERSECTION.
IF I AM THERE FIRST AND AM MAKING A TURN, YOU SLOW YOUR GOD DAMNED
BIKE DOWN AND YEILD THE RIGHT OF WAY INSTEAD OF BLINDING ME WITH
YOUR BRIGHTS.
THAT IS UNLESS YOU DON'T MIND YOUR UNSURANCE COMPANY PAINTING
MY ENTIRE CAR, AND YOU AND YOUR BIKE BECOMING A SPOT ON THE
SIDE OF MY DOOR.

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

You no drive no car troll. You drive yellow big bus as passanger. Stop try to be big gringo. You little.

'Harley' wrote :
> "However, another defensive tactic is to ride closer to
> the car in front of me"

LESS THAN ONE CAR LENGTH @ HIGHWAY SPEEDS IS ILLEGAL.
AND IS DANGEROUS FOR YOU IN ITSELF.

> "leaving even a couple car lengths between us is the space
> where someone who isnt thinking just assumes there is nobody
> there and will turn into me (without a turn signal or any
> other indication of a lane change). Again, probably against
> the law as I would be considered "following too closely" and
> the person in front of me is probably taking notice, but I'm
> trying to find a balance between being seen and being safe.

I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THE HARLEY RIDERS THAT PRACTICE THIS
TECHNIQUE AT NIGHT WITH THEIR BRIGHTS ON, RIDING ON A TWO WAY ROAD.
I PULL OVER AND LET THEM PASS ME EVERYTIME.
EXTREMELY ANNOYING.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 'Harley' wrote :
> > "However, another defensive tactic is to ride
> closer to
> > the car in front of me"
>
> LESS THAN ONE CAR LENGTH @ HIGHWAY SPEEDS IS
> ILLEGAL.
> AND IS DANGEROUS FOR YOU IN ITSELF.
>
> > "leaving even a couple car lengths between us is
> the space
> > where someone who isnt thinking just assumes
> there is nobody
> > there and will turn into me (without a turn
> signal or any
> > other indication of a lane change). Again,
> probably against
> > the law as I would be considered "following too
> closely" and
> > the person in front of me is probably taking
> notice, but I'm
> > trying to find a balance between being seen and
> being safe.
>
> I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND THE HARLEY RIDERS THAT
> PRACTICE THIS
> TECHNIQUE AT NIGHT WITH THEIR BRIGHTS ON, RIDING
> ON A TWO WAY ROAD.
> I PULL OVER AND LET THEM PASS ME EVERYTIME.
> EXTREMELY ANNOYING.
> .

You sound like annoying old woman like your mommy. Shut up you beef and cheese eating little girl.

Troll@AOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "The DMV manual says use high beams"
>
> NOT @ night, BROOMSTICK-ASSHOLE.
>


I only use high beam during the day, like the DMV manual states.

And Kilton, since the code and DMV manual that is based on code contradict, perhaps you should go consult with a judge for a clarification - since it means so much to you.

Mid to low 70s through the weekend. I'll be out riding and using my high beams while you go check it out.

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

Dane Bramage Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And Kilton, since the code and DMV manual that is
> based on code contradict, perhaps you should go
> consult with a judge for a clarification

No need. Any idiot knows that the law trumps a DMV manual. Well, almost any idiot. :-)

yay. another group of people that are entitled to special treatment.

Troll, You sad little boy.....

I find it amusing that without any effort I make you so darn angry. Your sad and lengthy attempts to correct my spelling and vocabulary are quite droll (look that up), considering how wildly you are mispelling your CAPS vitriol (whoops, that's another big word for you).

"Wend" was actually used correctly, just to give you a little bit of education.

The best part was the fact that you couldn't even spell "thesaurus" correctly...ouch; better stick to made-up words that you're comfortable with, such as "fagapuss," etc, and leave correcting other people's English to someone who knows how to spell and construct a sentence, skills that you lack.

It must tear you up that there is actually some reasoned dialog going on here, but you can always be relied on to scream for attention, with your threats to hurt someone on the road.

And no, as much as you love that broomstick to which you constantly refer, you'll have to find someone else to stick it up your ass for you...

PS...bicycle, motorcycle...two different things

I personally believe that people should have to ride a motorcycle for a year before they are allowed to drive a car..

It will put a whole different perspective of defensive driving.

I used to ride over well over 10K miles a year before moving to this area.. Around here I'm lucky to get 4K a year, and when I do ride that, I do it out of this are..

I've never seen more self centered cage drivers anywhere else in my life... Everything is about them, and hearing people here complain about loud pipes points that out to me. Sorry we do something that keeps us riders a little safer and bothers you for 15 seconds..

I've never in my life lived in an area with so many pompous asses..

I need to get a stack of bumper stickers made up... Your BMW (or other snooty auto brand) does not make you as important as you think you are.

Yes, I ride with my high beams on. Yes, I have loud pipes on one of my bikes, and yes, I have high end and very loud air horns on my bikes..

By some freak of nature, I'm still alive after riding with all the self serving specially entitled cage drivers in this area..

You can bitch about my high beams and loud pipes all you like, but at least they allow me to be here to listen to your drivel..

anon Secret-Thesaurus user 'Lee Marvin' wrote :
> "I find it amusing that without any effort I make you so darn angry."

THE LACK OF EFFORT IS A RESULT OF YOU BEING NATURALLY STUPID.
HATE TO BURST YOUR *DARN* BUBBLE, BUT YOU ARE THE ONLY ANGRY ONE HERE,
THIS IS A BIG FUN GAME TO ME!

> "Your sad and lengthy attempts to correct my spelling and vocabulary

SAD, -THAT I HAVE TO CORRECT YOU ON SUCH SIMPLETON SHIT, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS.

> "are quite droll (look that up),

YEAH, I'LL GET RIGHT ON IT. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK WITH THE THESAURUS.
YOUR BOMBASTIC USE OF UNCOMMON WORDS JUST MAKES YOUR IDIOT SHINE.

> "considering how wildly you are mispelling your CAPS vitriol (whoops, that's another big word for you).

OOOOOHHHHHHHH *VITRIOL* -NOPE NEVER HEARD THAT ONE BEFORE,
YOU BUMBLING RETARD

OH, AND TYPOS OR MISPELLING STUFF IS ONE THING -BUT BLATANT INCORRECT
USAGE OF A THESAURUS TO SPICE UP YOUR GARABGE LITERARY COMPOSITIONS,
IS JUST APPALLING.

> "'Wend' was actually used correctly, just to give
> you a little bit of education."

REALLY? I GUESS YOU HAVE A POINT IF YOUR INTENTION WAS TO SOUND
LIKE A TEA AND CRUMPETS EATING BRITISH FAGGOT.

http://i.word.com/idictionary/wend

Main Entry: wend
Pronunciation: \ˈwend\
Function: verb
Old English windan to twist - more at ***WIND*** <--- HTTP://www.LOOK_HERE.com

****SEE ASSHOLE, EVEN THE DICTIONARY TELLS YOU THE WORD YOU WERE
LOOKING FOR WAS *WIND*

ADMIT IT DOOFUS, THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF YOUR
*POOR* THESAURUS USE.

Date: before 12th century
intransitive verb
: to direct one's course : travel
transitive verb
: to proceed on (one's way) : direct

SO EVEN IF WE USE THE TRANSITIVE VERB DEFINITION; IT STILL SOUNDS DUMB
EX. "..After I *directed* or *proceeded on* my way through your word soup.."

EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT THIS CAVE-MAN LIKE USE OF THE WORD, IT WAS NOT USED IN PROPER TENSE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONTEXT OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SENTENCE.

YOU TRIED TO SAY; "After I winded through your word soup"
-BUT OF COURSE YOU FUCKED IT ALL UP, TRYING TO ACT SMART.

SEE :

http://i.word.com/idictionary/winded
*WINDED*

3 a : to cause to move in a curving line or path (1) : to cause (as a ship) to change direction : turn (2) : to turn (a ship) end for end d : to traverse on a curving course e : to effect by or as if by curving


CLEARLY YOU ARE A BLOODY DOUCHE BAG !
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

SAME anon-IDIOT using screen name 'Three Cents Worth' wrote :
> "Sorry we do something that keeps us riders a little safer and bothers you for 15 seconds.."

EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE THE SAME PERSON KNOWN AS THE anon-DOUCHE BAG 'Lee Marvin'
I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT UP A GREAT PIONT. IT MAY JUST BE A LITTLE MORE THAN A BOTHER TO ME BECAUSE I AM YOUNG, BUT THE EYES OF OLDER DRIVERS WITH AGING EYE MUSCLES OR EVEN YOUNG PEOPLE WITH BAD EYES, DON'T REACT AS FAST AS OURS AND IT MAY SEVERELY COMPROMISE THEIR ABILITY TO SEE FOR UP TO FIFTEEN SECONDS IF NOT LONGER. EVEN THOUGH YOU MAY MAKE IT PAST THE PERSON SAFELY, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRIBUTING TO AN ACCIDENT AND POSSIBLY HOMICIDE IF YOU ARE AROGANTLY, WILLFULLY, AND IGNORANTLY RIDING AROUND WITH YOUR HIGH BEAMS ON BLINDING EVERY OTHER DRIVER ON THE ROADS AT NIGHT

ALTHOUGH IN *BROAD* DAYLIGHT WHO REALLY GIVES A DAMN, BUT AT DUSK (sun down) YOU SHOULD BE DIMMING YOUR BRIGHTS FOR TWO WAY TRAFFIC AND WHEN TAILGATING CARS!

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

But I am the guy you replyed to Troll.. If you were only half as bright as you think you are... I got no clue whot the hell Lee Marvin is... I seldom hang out around here because I do have a life...

I will do what ever I have to do legal or not to stay alive while riding on the streets with self-important people like yourself..

If I have to pay a ticket for brights, then so be it.. I'm alive.. I also ride with black lights under the tank that illuminates the bike from the side. Also not legal, but I've also never had a cop stop me for it when riding by them... If I pay a ticket for them.. then so be it.

Three Cents Worth.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, I ride with my high beams on. Yes, I have
> loud pipes on one of my bikes, and yes, I have
> high end and very loud air horns on my bikes..
>


Air horns, that's a novel idea. That'll be one of my upgrades in the very near future.

along with some Troll repellent.

-------------------------------------------------
“We don’t have any rude, unpleasant people here. We’re different!”

Hrmmm.... few ounces of windshield washer fluid for a dented door panel sounds like a smart trade.

Wow, Troll, I can't believe all the time it must have taken you to work your potato-chip-grease-laden keyboard to cut and paste your response to me. And even with the aid of a "thesuarus," as you so charmingly spell it, you still only managed to come up with a bizarre word-salad worthy of a psychotic, which, of course, you are. To compound your madness, you think that every rational person on this thread is actually one person.

Say, did you read the news item about the Latin Kings Goonies gang in NYC who anally raped a kid this past weekend? Seven of these brave guys held the kid down while the eighth raped him with a broomstick and toy baseball bat..apparently the kid was accused of being gay, and this was his "punishment." Seven have been arrested, and the eighth is still at large. A broomstick? That's an amazing coincidence, given your fascination with them...were you in NYC this weekend? This kind of gay self-hatred is right up your alley...I wonder if there's an award for turning you in...

PS...in spite of all your frothing-at-the-mouth efforts to prove what seemed to be an very important point to you, I did use "wend" correctly....

I'm actually performing a public service here...all the hours you spend at the keyboard "responding" to imaginary enemies are hours that you're NOT on the road, endangering motorcyclists..or bicyclists, as to you they seem to be one and the same...

Lee Marvin aka Vince(1) aka Vincent Trinka wrote :

> "to cut and paste your response to me."

SORRY BUT THE ONLY THING I CUT AND PASTED WAS REFERENCES
TO DICTIONARY WEBSITES BOZO. THE FACT THAT YOU SEEMED
CONCERNED WITH ME SWITCHING AN 'A' and a 'U' AROUND WHEN I
WAS REFERENCING THE FACT THAT YOU REGULARLY POST UNDER ANONOMOUS
UNREGISTERED NAMES AND USE A THESauRUS IN AN *ATTEMPT* TO SPICE UP
YOUR DRAB-LABORED-GARBAGE LITERARY COMPOST-SITIONS.
THIS SHOULD MEAN THAT YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH SUCH, AND WOULD NOT
SIMPLY COME BACK WITH A DOUCHE BAG ACCUSATION THAT I AM
SIMPLY "CUT AND PASTING" MY RESPONSES VINCE(1) aka VINCENT TRINKA.
YOU HAVE NOBODY FOOLED.

> "were you in NYC this weekend?"

NO.

> "This kind of gay self-hatred is right up your alley...

SORRY BUT YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN. IT IS GAYS THAT ARE FULL
OF SELF-HATRED! THEY HAVE GONE AS FAR AS TO TRY AND FORCE
OTHERS TO ACCEPT THEIR PERVERTED SHIT-SUCKING LIFESTYLE THROUGH
LEGALIZING A NON EXISTANT CONCEPT CALLED "Gay"-MARRAIGE.

DON'T BLAME ME BECAUSE GAYS ARE *WELL* KNOWN FOR SHOVING LIVE-HAMSTERS
AND BROOMSTICKS UP THEIR *OWN* ASSES, UNFORTUNATELY FOR THIS
SHIT-EATING FAGGY FUCK SOMEONE ELSE TOOK THE *LIBERTY* FOR HIM.

FILTHY FAGGOTS.

> "PS...in spite of all your frothing-at-the-mouth efforts
> to prove what seemed to be an very important point to you,
> I did use "wend" correctly...."

AS I PREVIOUSLY POINTED OUT, IF YOUR INTENTION WAS TO SOUND LIKE A
TEA AND CRUMPETS EATING BRITISH FAGGOT, THEN I WOULD AGREE.

AND YES, I HAVE ALREADY POINTED OUT AND PROVEN THAT
YOUR NEANDERTHAL-LIKE USE OF THE WORD WAS INCORRECT, DUMBASS.

> "I wonder if there's an award for turning you in..."

YES INFACT THERE IS : click here ----> http://www.GoFuckYourselfInTheAssYouDirtyFaggot.com

> "I'm actually performing a public service here...
> all the hours you spend at the keyboard "responding" to
> imaginary enemies"

SORRY BUT YOU ARE NOT IMAGINARY. WHAT ABOUT THE HOURS YOU
SPEND COMING HERE TO PROTEST MY OPINIONS?

> "are hours that you're NOT on the road, endangering motorcyclists..

TO MAKE UP FOR LOST TIME; I WILL BE SURE TO BE AN
*EXTRA* HUGE ASSHOLE TO YOU FUCKERS THE NEXT TIME ONE OF
YOU COCKSUKERS IS TAILGATING ME WITH YOUR BRIGHTS ON.
WINDSHIELD WASHERS ON HIGH GETS YOU FAGGOTS TO DROP
BACK LIKE A MILE...

BECAUSE YOUR PIECES OF SHIT ARE ALWAYS TOO SLOW TO PASS!
Haha!

> "or bicyclists, as to you they seem to be one and the same..."

LOOK DIPSHIT, YOU KNOW I NEVER SAID THEY ARE THE SAME BUT THEY
ARE BOTH TWO WHEELED VEHICLES AND BOTH JUST AS GAY AS THE OTHER.

SO GO FUCK YOURSELF WITH A BROKEN-BROOMSTICK YOU SELF-LOATHING FAGGOT.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Trollster, You're SO predictible...


"SORRY BUT THE ONLY THING I CUT AND PASTED WAS REFERENCES
TO DICTIONARY WEBSITES BOZO. THE FACT THAT YOU SEEMED
CONCERNED WITH ME SWITCHING AN 'A' and a 'U' AROUND WHEN I
WAS REFERENCING THE FACT THAT YOU REGULARLY POST UNDER ANONOMOUS
UNREGISTERED NAMES AND USE A THESauRUS IN AN *ATTEMPT* TO SPICE UP
YOUR DRAB-LABORED-GARBAGE LITERARY COMPOST-SITIONS.
THIS SHOULD MEAN THAT YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH SUCH, AND WOULD NOT
SIMPLY COME BACK WITH A DOUCHE BAG ACCUSATION THAT I AM
SIMPLY "CUT AND PASTING" MY RESPONSES VINCE(1) aka VINCENT TRINKA.
YOU HAVE NOBODY FOOLED."


I should feel guilty...this is like repeatedly poking a helpless 600lb Down's Syndrome victim with a stick to evoke an angry reaction from him. Actually, I should say, poking a 600lb Down's Syndrome victim with a BROOM HANDLE...HA!

I'm not surprised that you feel that the NYC rape victim "deserved it." No doubt your nights are haunted by dreams of being anally violated by a gang of muscular young men. That's very typical of your pathological gay self-denial; learn to accept yourself.

Are you aware that the madder you get, the worse your spelling ("compost-sitions"?)and diction gets? You even spelled "cocksucker" wrong ("cocksuker"), and that's a word you use all the time.

And speaking of a "thesuarus," you should use one to "spice up" your brain-lesion-affected vocabulary; you're repeating yourself at this point...not that I don't get a good laugh every time you type, "shit eating faggy fuck."

Thanks for the additional documentation that you plan on being an "extra huge asshole" when you're on the road...although it is a bit redundant at this point to call yourself an extra huge asshole. I'll keep alert for windshield washer spray when I'm riding my motorcycle at safe legal speeds.

And sorry, I have no idea who Vince Trinka is...

Vince(1) /someone acting as DUMB as Vince wrote :

> "I should feel guilty...this is like repeatedly poking a
> helpless 600lb Down's Syndrome victim with a stick to evoke
> an angry reaction from him."

BEING THAT YOUR STATEMENTS SOUND LIKE THEY ARE COMING FROM
A 600 LB RETARD -MAKES THIS FUNNY.

> "Actually, I should say, poking a 600lb Down's Syndrome
> victim with a BROOM HANDLE...HA!"

MAYBE A FAGGOT LIKE YOURSELF MIGHT BE WILLING TO REMOVE YOUR
BROOMSTICK FROM YOUR ASS LONG ENOUGH TO PULL THAT OFF,
BUT I DOUBT IT.

> "I'm not surprised that you feel that the NYC rape
> victim "deserved it."

NEVER SAID THIS YOU QUEER LIAR.
NOW YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SEE WHY I THINK YOU ARE VINCE TRINKA.

> "No doubt your nights are haunted by dreams of being anally
> violated by a gang of muscular young men.

DON'T SUPERIMPOSE YOUR PERVERTED FANTASIES ONTO ME.
*YOU ARE THE FAG.*

> "That's very typical of your pathological gay self-denial;
> learn to accept yourself.

HERE YOU GO CALLING ME PATHOLOGICAL BECAUSE YOUR SUBCONCIENCE
KNOWS YOU JUST FINISHED LYING ABOUT ME BY SAYING THAT I STATED THAT
PRISSY SHIT EATING QUEER DESERVED WHAT HE GOT. THEN YOU SAY I AM
A FAGGOT LIKE YOU, AND THAT I JUST 'NEED TO ACCEPT MYSELF' EVEN THOUGH
YOU YOURSELF ARE THE SELF-LOATHING FAGGOT, WHO ONCE AGAIN HAS BEEN
CAUGHT TRYING TO PROJECT YOUR HOMOSEXUAL REALITY ONTO ME.

Are you aware that the madder you get, the worse your spelling ("compost-sitions"?)and diction gets?

NOBODY IS IMPRESSED WITH YOUR *IMPROPER* USE OF THE WORD 'DICTION'
YOU RETARD. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVEN'T A CLUE AS HOW TO USE THIS WORD
IN PROPER CONTEXT ALSO.

BY THE WAY, 'COMPOST-sitions' = YOUR ROTTEN HEAP OF LITERARY GARBAGE.


> 'You even spelled "cocksucker" wrong ("cocksuker")'

WHO CARES, You stoopid fukin shit sukin FAgOT?

> "and that's a word you use all the time."

OHHHHHHH TYPOS!!!!!!!! YOU SO SMRT EWE QUEAR COKSUKER!!!!!!!

> "And speaking of a "thesuarus," you should use one to
> "spice up" your brain-lesion-affected vocabulary;"

HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A ***ONE TRACK MIND***???

> "you're repeating yourself at this point..."

ACTUALLY I BELIEVE THAT WOULD DESCRIBE WHAT YOU ARE DOING
RIGHT NOW PRETTY DAMN ACURATELY.

> "not that I don't get a good laugh every time you type,
> "shit eating faggy fuck."

TRUST ME, I WOULDN'T BE LAUGHING IF I WAS FORCED TO WATCH YOU
SUCK THE SHIT OUT OF -OR INSERT YOUR MALE MEMBER INTO ANOTHER
MANS RECTUM.

> "Thanks for the additional documentation that you plan on
> being an "extra huge asshole" when you're on the road...a
> lthough it is a bit redundant at this point to call yourself
> an extra huge asshole.

GUESS YOU ALSO HAVE NO CLUE OF WHAT THE WORD "REDUNDANT" MEANS
OR ANY CONCEPT OF HOW TO EFFECTIVELY USE IT PROPERLY IN CONTEXT.
ALTHOUGH I WILL SAY YOUR GARBAGE RESPONSES THAT YOU CRAFT ARE
BECOMING RATHER RENDUNDANT IN THEMSELVES.

> "I'll keep alert for windshield washer spray when I'm
> riding my motorcycle at safe legal speeds.

AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT ILLEGALLY USING YOUR BRIGHTS AND
NOT TAILGATING ANYONE, I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT
SOMEONE CLEANING THEIR WINDSHIELD.

AMIRIGHT? OR AMIRIGHT?

.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

600lb Babycakes just got poked again. You're losing it, dude.

Actually, it is YOU who has lost IT -and this discussion for that matter.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

if u see my high beems then thay did there job

Same goes for mine. And if you feel my washer fluid, that motherfucker's doing it's job also.

On the other hand, it appears spellcheck didn't do it's job. 'THEY' and 'THEIR' you dumbass.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Ah, Troll, you might want to check your own spelling before calling someone else a dumbass...there's a difference between "its" and "it's", you rump ranger fairymuffin!

And I don't think that's really windshield washer fluid that will be spurting from your car...admit it, you're turned on by motorcycles!

YOU are COMPLETELY WRONG !

"It's" is a POSSESIVE-CONTRACTION.

BESIDES, this is known as GRAMMAR -NOT spelling, you Ass-Weasel !
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Afraid not, Babycakes..."its" is a possessive pronoun. "It's" is a contraction for either "it is," or "it has." Look it up on your beloved Internet. You made the same mistake twice in one posting, and yet again you've gleefully exposed your ignorance to the entire world...

This is such basic English grammar. I find it quite humorous that an insignificant illiterate shitcake like you would even try to correct me...know your place, Fagapuss.

Dikisuckia wrote :

> "Afraid not, Babycakes..."

DON'T CALL ME BABY CAKES, I AM NOT YOUR GAY LOVER.

> "its" is a possessive pronoun.
> "It's" is a contraction for either "it is," or "it has."

GUESS WHAT, I WAS MAKING A JOKE THAT'S WHY I SAID IT
WAS A "POSSESIVE-CONTRACTION.

> "Look it up on your beloved Internet."

LIKE YOU JUST DID?

BECAUSE IF YOU REALLY KNEW JACK SHIT,
YOU WOULD HAVE CALLED ME ON THE FACT THAT THERE IS
NO SUCH THING AS A 'POSSESIVE-CONTRACTION'.

> "You made the same mistake twice in one posting,"

SO?

JUST LIKE A ONE-TRACK MINDED SIMPLETON, YOU ARE FIXATING ON
IRRELEVANT TANGENTS BECAUSE YOUR POINT AND ARGUMENT WAS LOST
A LONG, LONG TIME AGO -AND YOU KNOW IT.

> "and yet again you've gleefully exposed your
> ignorance to the entire world..."

ACTUALLY, THAT WOULD MORE ACURATELY DESCRBE WHAT YOU
ARE DOING RIGHT NOW.


> "This is such basic English grammar."

SEE YOU ADMITTED IT, AS I PREVIOUSLY POINTED OUT IT IS INDEED
GRAMMAR, *NOT* SPELLING -YOU DICK CHOMPING MORON.

> "I find it quite humorous that an insignificant illiterate
> shitcake like you would even try to correct me..."

I FIND IT HUMOROUS THAT A SUPPOSED INSIGNIFICANT ILLITERATE
SHITCAKE FINDS HIMSELF SO INCREDIBLY BUSY CORRECTING THE WORK OF
A SCHOLAR SUCH AS YOURSELF.

> "know your place, Fagapuss."

FOR FUTURE REFERENCE :

DO *NOT* USE MY PATENTED 'FAGAPUSS' WORD WITHOUT
PRIOR EXPRESSED WRITTEN APPROVAL!
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

So BABYCAKES, you take all that time at your sheltered workshop computer terminal, trying to "correct" me on something as simple as "it's" versus "its,"you manage to get it 100% WRONG, and now you say it was a "joke" when you spent all that time typing out psychotic bullshit?....Right...so who's the dick chomping moron...again?

This is so funny (and pathetic). One more time, Troll......"its" is a possessive pronoun. "It's" is a contraction for either "it is," or "it has." Even one of your "Mexican biker midgets" knows the difference.

And bringing all this full circle, you're just as wrong in your red-faced ranting about motorcycle high beams. Remember the original topic?.

Well, IT'S been fun, although I do feel a bit guilty for taunting an obviously handicapped person. Whose broomstick is that sticking out of Troll's ass? IT'S Troll's! ITS splinters excite Troll!

Buh bye, Fagapuss

anon-imbecile who enjoys GETTING HIS ASS KICKED -named 'Lee Marvin' wrote:

> "So BABYCAKES,"

DIDN'T I ASK YOU NOT TO ADDRESS ME, LIKE YOU DO YOUR GAY LOVER?

> "you take all that time at your sheltered workshop
> computer terminal, trying to "correct" me on something
> as simple as "it's" versus "its,"

ACTUALLY VERY LITTLE TIME WAS SPENT, YOU ARE THE
ONE WHO SEEMS TO THINK THIS IS TIME CONSUMING, IDIOT.

> "you manage to get it 100% WRONG, and now
> you say it was a "joke"

UM, THE REFERENCE TO A 'POSSESIVE-CONTRACTION' WAS THE JOKE
YOU WERE JUST TOO STUPID TO CALL ME ON THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO
SUCH THING.

AND THEN YOU WENT AS FAR AS TO WASTE YOUR TIME THINKING YOU
ARE TEACHING ME COMMON KNOWLEDGE.
I'M SORRY GRAMMER IS NOT MY TOP PRORITY AS I AM LAUGHING MY
ASS OFF @ YOU WHILE I TYPE OUT MY RESPONSES TO YOUR RETARDED DRIVVEL.

> "when you spent all that time typing out psychotic bullshit?....Right..."

AGAIN, NOTHING WAS BULLSHIT ACCEPT THE FACT THAT YOU SEEMED TO
THINK GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ARE THE SAME AS SPELLING ERRORS.

> "so who's the dick chomping moron...again?"

***YOU***.

> "This is so funny (and pathetic)."

LAUGHING AT YOURSELF AGAIN?
TRUST ME, I'M LAUGHING TOO!


> "One more time, Troll......"its" is a possessive pronoun.
> "It's" is a contraction for either "it is," or "it has."

YOU MORON. AGAIN YOU ARE MENTALLY RUNNING AROUND IN CIRCLES
LIKE YOU ARE ON A REDUNDANCY CRACK BINGE.

> "Even one of your "Mexican biker midgets" knows the difference."

LET'S LEAVE YOUR MOTHER OUT OF THIS. :~)

> "And bringing all this full circle,"

SEE, EVEN YOUR SUB-CONCIOUS IS AWARE YOU MENTALLY
RUN IN CIRCLES LIKE A RETARD!

> "you're just as wrong in your red-faced ranting about
> motorcycle high beams."

NO I AM NOT, YOU ARE THE ONE WHO HAS BEEN *CONSISTANTLY* WRONG

> "Remember the original topic?."

WHY ARE YOU REMINDING ME, THAT I REMINDED YOU OF
YOUR TENDANCY TO STRAY OFF OF THE TOPIC OR POINT?

> "Well, IT'S been fun,

YOU ARE NOT QUITING ON ME ARE YOU?

> "although I do feel a bit guilty for taunting an
> obviously handicapped person."

HANDICAPPED -IF GETTING OFF TO A PICTURE OF YOUR
MOTHER IS A PREREQUISITE.

> "Whose broomstick is that sticking out of Troll's ass?
> IT'S Troll's! ITS splinters excite Troll!"

SPEAKING OF SPLINTERS, YOUR DICK IS SO SMALL
YOUR MOTHER NEEDS A MICROSCOPE TO SUCK YOU OFF.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Wow, Troll got schooled!

More like Troll schooled YOU.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Whose broomstick is that sticking out of Troll's ass?
IT'S Troll's! ITS splinters excite Troll!


Ha Ha...

this post has been going on for over 6 months now... TROLL are you still alive?

YES, I am alive and well in my SUV.

These things are like magic!
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

great to hear! these silly motorcyclists must not be so dangerous after all! now you can shut the fuck up!

***Actually why dont YOU STFU, you FAGGOT !***


~~Here's an encore presentation of my FAVORITE post from this thread :

***anon-user 'highbeams' wrote :

> "how is this making motorcycles less visible?
> you obviously see it."

OF COURSE WE SEE IT!
....AND LOOK AWAY!

WHEN YOU WERE A KID DID YOU OPEN YOUR EYES WIDE AND
STARE AT A FLASHLIGHT IF A FRIEND WAS GOOFING AROUND
SHINING IT IN YOUR FACE?

SAME IDEA ASSHOLE.

> "i hope you mistake a motorcycle for a train and
> try to run it off the road"


Ummmmmm Mr highbeams,

Why would you want me to mistakenly play chicken with some motorcycle riding around blinding people with his HIGHBEAMS? So I can make a blinded left turn infront of him and he can explode like a watermelon getting blasted by a Mossberg shotgun?

Your SICK!

***Anon-highbeam using dipshit 'pollster' wrote :

> "I was just so blinded by his soooo bright highbeam that I had to
> make my left turn to avoid the retinal disabling light he was
> aiming at me...."

SINCE I AM IN THE INTERSECTION FIRST AND I AM LEGALLY IN THE MIDDLE
OF *EXECUTING* A TURN -YOU ARE THE ONE BREAKING ALL THE LAWS.
MAYBE IF YOU WEREN'T *SPEEDING* AND *BLINDING* ME WITH YOUR HEADLIGHTS,
I WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO JUDGE YOUR DISTANCE AND SPEED AS YOUR
BODY HURTLED TOWARDS ME ATOP A 200HP ASSHOLE-VIBRATOR WITH A
CUSTOM PAINT JOB. BECAUSE IF MY VISION WAS NOT OBSCURED BY STRAY LIGHT
FROM YOUR HIGHBEAMS, I MIGHT HAVE NOTICED YOUR UNUSUALLY HIGH RATE
OF SPEED AND I COULD HAVE HURRIED UP OUT OF THE INTERSECTION FOR YOU.
BUT SINCE YOU MADE ME WINCE FROM YOUR USING YOUR BRIGHTS, I COULD
NOT JUDGE YOUR DISTANCE OR SPEED SO YOU ARE NOW A SAFE-MOTORCYCLE
DRIVING SPLAT ON THE SIDE OF MY CAR.

ALL BECAUSE YOU WANTED TO USE YOUR HIGHBEAMS INSTEAD OF YOUR BRAKES!

TOO BAD FOR YOU.
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

A "200 pound asshole vibrator"

That's a new one...I never tire of your literary gifts.

I bet you know all about asshole vibrators, Troll...

I like the way you added the "custom paint job" part...

Let's be honest, you made up the line about being a kid and having a friend shine a flashllight in your face since, as we all know, you've never had a friend in your life

Greetings,

I'm the Safety Officer for the Mexican Midget Motorcycle Club (MMMC), and I would like to say that we make it our official policy to use high beams while on group rides, but we only use high beams during daylight hours. At night we use just our low beams. Of course, we're riding mini-bikes, so it really doesn't matter either way.

Regards,

Hector

"MMMC...We're a club, not a gang"...

Oh cool, I saw you guys passing me yesterday on 66.

I was the guy driving with my head sticking out of the sunroof,
banging on a tamberine screaming aye yaye yaye yaye yeeee!
.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

You making fun of La Raza? I take you down, culo.

You making fun of MIS JUEVOS? Their odor will make you two (2) shades browner, amigo.

==================================================================================
"Why don't you LOSERS just pack your flower print DOUCHE BAGS
and get your stoopid @$$#$ THE FUCK OFF MY INTERNETZ!"

- 'philscamms' (the YT Watchdog) ; internet & YouTube® extraordinaire.

Obviously troll's caps lock key is stuck. Don't you know that the caps key automatically turns people into trolls? I suggest you go to a computer specialist and fix this problem, that way you can make a more logical argument.

!!!PU KCUF EHT TUHS ,ESAELP

Go away Troll. Angry closeted queers who can't spell are so 2009...

Blinded by motorcycle high beams in the daytime..? You've got to be kidding me.

I suppose you go into epileptic seizure when a motorcycle headlight is modulated?

Thanks for resurrecting a thread that's been dead six months, dicklick.

Too bad Troll died from AIDS... His rants were amusing

Kiragirl
Road courtesy works both ways. No one wants high beam shinning in their eyes. It is irritating and dangerous!

This thread is dead, man...

Zombie Thread Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This thread is dead, man...

Actually, coming at me with your high beams on increases my likely hood to exhibit road rage and run you into the ditch.

Ignorant A-holes in Colorado run that state.