Home•Fairfax General Forum•Arrest/Ticket Search•Wiki new•Pictures/Videos•Chat•Articles•Links•About
You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Bezos the Turd ()
Date: November 24, 2017 08:27PM

http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/24/technology/jeff-bezos-100-billion/index.html

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Free Reader ()
Date: November 24, 2017 09:51PM

You could circumvent it for years by simply clicking the reader view. That's how stupid the people who were running the WaPo were - they put up a paywall, and it took them YEARS before they realized you could go around it.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: A Little Clue ()
Date: November 24, 2017 09:54PM

Personally, the Washington Po Po isn't worth reading, even if it's free!

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Bezos Post ()
Date: November 24, 2017 10:14PM

The only thing the Post is good for is starting a roaring fire in the fireplace.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Jlacy ()
Date: November 24, 2017 11:23PM

A Little Clue Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Personally, the Washington Po Po isn't worth
> reading, even if it's free!


So says the guy who has never bought or read a newspaper in his life.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: midnightshifter ()
Date: November 25, 2017 02:37AM

I used to have a print subscription but the bird died so I don't need it anymore.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Morton.in.Lorton ()
Date: November 25, 2017 10:35AM

I first got online in 1996. Within the first week, I started consuming most of my news online. A few days later I remember having this enlightened, woke moment where I said, "If I am paying for dial-up service, why would I also pay for newspapers when I get my news online, too?" I cancelled my newspaper subscriptions that day.

And here were are 21 years later and The Post is still trying to convince its dwindled readership that their reporting and journalism is still worth paying for? Do they realize that the best journalists don't work for newspapers anymore and haven't for quite some time?

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: MTDHK ()
Date: November 25, 2017 05:33PM

Stopped subscription of this liberal paper several years ago, encouraged Obama to destroy the morality of this country including in the military. IMO only thing in it a little worth while in the WP is the traffic reporting, but even then, there are other multiple sources for that, including Waze.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Incog Nito ()
Date: November 25, 2017 05:44PM

all you need to do is use Google Chrome or Firefox and open in Incognito Window.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: giddyup ()
Date: November 25, 2017 06:01PM

What does "clicking the reader view" mean specifically for us simpletons? I don't see that anywhere on the Post website.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Here you go gramps ()
Date: November 25, 2017 06:12PM

giddyup Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What does "clicking the reader view" mean
> specifically for us simpletons? I don't see that
> anywhere on the Post website.

In the address box, to the left of the website address, there is a graphic of horizontal lines like lines of a printed page. It allows you to view a website sans all graphics, just type. It doesn’t work on the WaPo site anymore, but it’s useful in this day and age of horeibly coded, dysfunctional sites that crash your computer with their ridiculous ads.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: What browser? ()
Date: November 25, 2017 06:17PM

Here you go gramps Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In the address box, to the left of the website
> address, there is a graphic of horizontal lines
> like lines of a printed page. It allows you to
> view a website sans all graphics, just type. It
> doesn’t work on the WaPo site anymore, but
> it’s useful in this day and age of horeibly
> coded, dysfunctional sites that crash your
> computer with their ridiculous ads.

What browser? Not there in Firefox, Chrome, or IE.

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: no free lunch ()
Date: November 25, 2017 06:30PM

He didn’t become the worlds richest man by giving away shit for free!

Re: You would think the douche bag could afford to drop the Washington Post pay wall!
Posted by: Hustla’s browser ()
Date: November 25, 2017 06:40PM

What browser? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here you go gramps Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In the address box, to the left of the website
> > address, there is a graphic of horizontal lines
> > like lines of a printed page. It allows you to
> > view a website sans all graphics, just type.
> It
> > doesn’t work on the WaPo site anymore, but
> > it’s useful in this day and age of horeibly
> > coded, dysfunctional sites that crash your
> > computer with their ridiculous ads.
>
> What browser? Not there in Firefox, Chrome, or IE.

Safari.

This forum powered by Phorum.